JUROR TELLS ALL! Amber was the Aggressor UK Barrister REACTION
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2022
- #DEPPVHEARD juror breaks silence and tells how the jury came to their verdict and why they didn't believe Amber.
More videos:
Amber's interview in Interview in #DeppvHeard reveals more possible truths following the trial...
Part 1 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 2 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 3 • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1:
• UK Barrister REACTION ...
PART 1:
• UK Barrister Analysis:...
Part 2:
• Depp v Heard UK Judgme...
PART 3
• INCIDENT 9 - "THE STAI...
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohn...
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
• Johnny Depp v Amber He...
Check out my exclusive content at www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Also me: czcams.com/users/blackbeltsecrets?...
My wife's cooking: czcams.com/users/easychinesecookin...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: clerks@ShenSmith.com
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact clerks@ShenSmith.com.
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3yFFcFf
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ And if you like my house and decor:
MY CHAIR:
amzn.to/3mYpPBB
Lamp 1 - amzn.to/3ntbEnm
Lamp 2 - amzn.to/3dXfUZi 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawyer #barrister
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated. Description may contain affiliate or sponsored links, for which we may receive commissions or payment.
I think trashing the jury shows extreme evil. They give up their life, they take an oath, they risk contempt charges for violating that oath. To demean and insult them that way is disgusting. It's on par with Amber's horrendous personality, but for Elaine to do that as well is particularly disgusting.
i felt sorry for a Elaine as i thought she was being bullied by Amber and was just doing her 'job' but that evaporated soon as she went to the media making accusations about the jury and other people.
I’ve been a juror 3x and am also a survivor of DV and SA. I always took my oath as a juror very very seriously and obeyed all the instructions given by the judges in the cases I sat on. Knowing that victims/survivors r sitting in the courtroom hoping the jury can help find them justice is something as a fellow victim/survivor that I wanted to do my best on if the EVIDENCE supported doing so. I watched this trial from start to finish myself bc I didn’t want MSM’s bias to impact me, and I wanted to decide for myself. I found AH to be the liar and the abuser and JD to be the injured party. I don’t have Twitter, FB, or IG so I wasn’t on social media either. I decided purely on what was presented in court. Most jurors take their oaths very seriously and do not want to be the responsible party for a mistrial or an appeals process.
@@loricawley54 I sincerely hope that jurors of the future have your same views on the subject. Thank you. (edited for typo....)
This woman is very deranged. Watch out JD who knows what she is capable of
Very true.
I believe Johnny’s verbal abuse was actually reactive abuse to the abuse he was receiving from amber towards himself especially if you hear the hours of audio were she was going at him and trying to get a reaction from him whether that was from gaslighting taunting goading or hitting him Johnny’s reaction to ghat is called reactive abuse so yes they were both abusive but I believe having lived it myself I firmly believe it was reactive from Johnny to the abuse he was receiving
One sign you're dealing with a narcissist is they bring out the worst in you.
His verbal responses were in response to her nasty attacks.
I couldn't agree more. Like the kitchen incident. It wasn't pretty, but he didn't touch her and it would take a saint to not lose one's temper at her behaviour. Bashing a cupboard or defacing a mirror is completely understandable imo. I am just worried (as per my separate comment) that as this juror's saying they were both abusive is grounds to invalidate the decision. I do so hope not :(
Absolutely
I think as well that his actions were only reactive, including a push to get her away. She would consider this abuse.
I grew up with a narcissist and I have bpd ptsd blah blah and I could tell from one look at how Johnny was shrunk in on himself, like a small child, that he was the victim.,as soon as he let go of the demons you could see that he looked like he was a foot taller. ❤️❤️
I think the trial process was very healing for him. He was gaslighted by her for so long, it probably helped to have The Truth, spelled out for all to hear, in such a trial.
Yes he did the right thing to live stream it as he knew everyone would see her for what she is. As he said its didn't matter who won he wanted people to understand what she truly is like.
YUP
The Jury came back with the correct verdict on the EVIDENCE that was given. Amber was her own worst enemy throughout with her actions and false statements. A child could have recognised she was lying.
Sandra, spot on!
Incredibly fair jury and judge .
in my household, a child DID recognise that ..... my 13yr old Granddaughter!
She really is. I'd feel sorry for her if she didn't drag other people down.
I try not to use bad language in my comments but that jury were absolutely fucking disgusting.
Depp was a totally innocent man who has gone through hell at the hands of a patently obvious lying, scheming, theiving, spiteful trollop. His case was so cast iron he wouldn't have done too much better if he was Christ on the cross (I'm not religious).
And for all that he has endured, much at the hands of the legal process it must be said, he got his OWN MONEY BACK AND THATS ALL.
The award was in effect the return of his divorce settlement IF SHE PAYS UP.. That's it
And to get that much he has had to spend $11m dollars at least in legal fees.
Quite honestly the jury were feckless and cowardly. And the victory it handed Heard in court has only emboldened her.
Yes it was her victory, because no man is going to have the strength of Depps case and such high priced legal representation. And yet he still lost.
Getting your own money back at the cost of $11m in a trial which success is measured in dollars IS NOT A VICTORY FOR DEPP or any man looking to the courts for redress.
If the jury had been following any of this on social media they wouldn’t have awarded her ANYTHING
Exactly!!!!
I tried to put myself in Depp's place during the trial and I found that listening to Turd accuse me of falsehoods made me angry. Don't know how he could stand it.
I think being around his lawyers who he was comfortable with and who from all appearances believed him probably helped.
@@jessejordache1869 good point 👍
Her ability to turn on and off her emotions on cue is one of the many reasons I didn't believe AH. I was married to a controlling, sadistic abuser who horribly abused my children, emotionally and physically, for the pleasure of destroying me-their mother. It took years to wrap my brain around this concept even though he flatly admitted it. I still cannot speak about most of the details and when I do it leaves me drained, emotionally shaken and filled with pain/anger. In AH's first deposition what we see is the behavior of an abuser- eating cookies, evasive when responding, smirking. There is no fear of JD, no anxiousness, no dread when "recalling" events. The court testimony was more of the same only now there is the inclusion of facial contortions supposed to mimic crying. No tears, no semblance of real emotions. All AH can produce is this faucet-like ability, turning on and off psuedo emotions in time with the movement of her head.
She is Borderline Personality Disordered and has an identity disturbance.
My Ex is BPD........a lot of crocodile tears. A lot of Narcissism and Sadism and cheating.
She refused to take responsibility for anything and ALWAYS played victim.
I think that was the acting. Gimme sad! Gimme happy! Gimme concerned! Action!.. and Cut!
For me, that was very noticeable at one point where Heard had turned to part of her team sitting behind her. As she turned, she went into smiling/flirty mode, then as soon as she started turning away, it was back to being Ice Queen. That just seemed incredibly fake. Especially as I think that came not long after the recording of Heard effectively daring Depp to go legal and doing her 'school marm' thing that nobody would believe him. Then Depp's response, where he sounded genuinely sad and hurt.
That’s a good point! Her performance in Virginia was confounding on it’s own, but it’s especially strange when you compare it to the UK trial tapes!
It was quite obvious to anyone with even an average IQ and even a SHRED of common sense that Amber Turd was lying once she took the stand. Actually...scratch that. It was obvious several years ago when those audio tapes first leaked. Specifically the one where she is high as a kite (in my opinion) or drunk and she is taunting Depp about his acting career and him writing (and potentially selling?) his journals or writing a memoir about his life.
In that incident she was ALONE WITH DEPP in an apartment. It was just the two of them. Moreover, this was AFTER she got TRO and publicly accused Depp of beating her up. NOBODY WITH A FREAKING BRAIN IN THEIR HEAD would EVER believe that a female victim of domestic violence would EVER talk to her ABUSER like that AT ANY POINT! Let alone right after you told the world publicly that he was a wife-beater AND when you are all alone with him in HIS APARTMENT!
That is literally the perfect scenario to not just get the SH!T beat out of her one last time, but in many REAL abusive relationships, that would've been the instance where the victim DIED at the hands of her abuser because he would've been absolutely beside himself with unbridled RAGE that his victim of five or six years had just publicly branded him a wife-beater and then came back to his apartment after getting a TRO and taunting and mocking him about doing so.
Just imagine how a REAL wife-beater would totally fly off the handle in a situation like that? Yet Depp uses nothing but his mouth and his wit to take shots back at Amber and her lies as she is making fun of him. He allows her to belittle and mock him and he basically just brushes it off. This is the man who she claimed during this trial would usually get the MOST violent SPECIFICALLY WHEN SHE "EMBARRASSED" HIM!!! WTF could ever be more "embarrassing" than being publicly labeled a "wife-beater" and getting slapped with a TRO that the whole world knows about?
She is truly a disgusting, evil POS.
I am truly sorry you experienced this.
She imagines abused women from movies. In movies women can get slapped around or punched and not get a mark. The way she describes it she would be unrecognizable for 2 weeks.
Honestly, by the way she spoke about how badly she was beaten and SA’d she SHOULD be dead! Assaulted in her vaginal area with a broken glass bottle and didn’t go to the doctor! Didn’t get a checkup or surgery! Doesn’t have any medical records about ANY of the beatings. She would have bled out and died from the glass bottle incident. And when she said she was beaten with his big chunky rings repeatedly, she must be a goddamn ghost! Not a scratch, not a mark, no broken nose, no bruises or face disfigurement. She’s a goddamn liar.
YES MAYBE FOR LIFE LOL
GT Godbear, you're right. I looked up pics on the web of broken noses and people who were hit in the face and gosh. The swelling! And purple, yellow white and reds! Eyes swollen shut...like Rocky after a fight. Anyone remember?? NO WAY ANY AMOUNT OF MAKE UP WITH ICE PACS WILL HIDE IT!! 😰
@@debraowen6723 REALLY THIS CHICK IS A FRAUD AND A HORRIBLE ACTRESS
Exactly. The woman can’t have even been in a fight in her life to have assumed all the injuries she’s claiming to have would have just DISAPPEARED or faded as much as she alleges they had in mere hours to a few days.
Like… Sis if he was beating the shit out of your FACE by this man who wear these heavy ass rings, you’d be eating through a straw for at least a week dude.
Headline for the trial: "Amber Heard, such a bad actress she fails to convince jury she is a human!" Her emotional state was either that of a robot, or a psychopath. She can only MIMIC feelings and emotion, she feels none of them.
YUP
I whole- heartedly disagree with the statement "they were both abusive". He responded incredibly well under extreme, near constant, timed (mother's death, loss of millions,, daughter's b-day) duress.
If the situation was reversed - a man terrorizing a woman during such events - would anyone criticize the woman for name- calling or raging texts to her friends?
I agree with you, I dislike such equivocation, so Johnny should have just stood there and take everything without occasionally retort.
^^^^This^^^^ Johnny's were clearly defensive. If he hadn't been being abused, he wouldn't engaged in what was defensive behavior.
I do think - those who say "they were both abusive" - *really* don't understand the nitty-gritty realities of constant exposure to a narcissistic abuser.
Amazing that the main stream media had to report that the jury saw what the rest of us saw as if it’s newsworthy. Are we living in the twilight zone??
YES WE R LIVING IN THE TWILIGHT ZONE EVERYDAY !! = UR COMMENT = WITTY >
I'm a Retired Paramedic in Ontario, Canada, and I can say this for a fact. MEN ARE VICTIMS OF DV as well as women. The problem here is this, if a man calls the Police for aid, the woman will 100% of the time self harm herself. To the point of drawing blood, and they will scratch their arm or neck to do this. So the Police arrive, they see the woman with "obvious injury", and the MAN, the one who CALLED FOR HELP, is immediately arrested. Men suffer from DV approximately 20% of the time. Men will suffer in silence, sometimes for years. Now here's another point to take into consideration. Per day, in the United States of America ALONE, there are 22 suicides. Not including any family gatherings like Weddings, Thanksgiving, Christmas and Birthdays where suicides rise. So, just taking the 22 per day multiplied by 365 days your total is 8,030. Now, add in all those family events, where suicides rise, you can easily add another 750 per year to that total. So now your total suicides per year are 8,780. So, once again, I'll break this down even further, FACT 1. Men commit suicide more than Women do. FACT 2. Of that final number, you will have approximately 10% that are accidental overdoses from drugs and are both men and women. FACT 3. Of that final number, you will have another 10% of suicides, both men and women, from Mental Illness. FACT 4. Of that final number, 60% are Former Military Personnel and are Veterans suffering from PTSD, and finally, FACT 5. The last 20% are Men who feel the only way to escape their DV is to commit suicide. And this is in the United States ONLY. Not including any other country like the United Kingdom, Canada or anywhere else. Just some food for thought. Men ARE AND DO suffer from DV, but they suffer in silence. From a Retired Paramedic who holds a B.Sc, An Undergraduate Degree, and had 2 years of Pre-Med prior to becoming a Paramedic for 37 years. From Ontario, Canada, Jenn. 💖 🇨🇦 🇬🇧
it was so insulting the way AH and her team went after the jurors, making out they were so stupid that they would be swayed by social media opinions and irresponsible they would disregard the judges orders by watching it all. I am glad the juror has come out and given some explanations as to why they reached their verdict. It's the same reasons we all sided with Johnny when the evidence or lack of started coming in.
Including a 60+ year old man, I’m sure TikTok mattered to him 🙄
Did she ever produce evidence that they were swayed or was it just a baseless accusation? You can always tell it's BS when they never say why something is the case.
for me it was pretty clear she was being the aggressor when i hear the recoding of Heard making fun of Depp for running from the fights.
Exactly, in my view that was quite telling. She was the one who wanted to physically fight, not him. I've been there too.
There was actually one time when she was "crying" she was supposed to be in this emotional state and she stops and poses for a picture. Stopping in the middle of an emotional testimony where she claims she was so abused to pose for this photograph was just so bizarre. She turning her fake emotions on and off were so disturbing
That was proved to be the flash from a screen not camera
YUP
I HOPE THOSE PICS WIND UP ON THE CUTTING ROOM FLOOR LOL
I remember that: suddenly she put the tissue to her face and held still for about four seconds and I was like "what is going on here?" and then I saw the flash, and was like "ah."
Having been on a jury (UK) for 6 months, (for a case which then collapsed; a whole other story), I absolutely believe in trial by jury as the correct way to "judge" circumstances and evidence as representatives of us all. The juror that has come forward seems balanced and not as polarised in his/her opinion as I believe they would be if they had absorbed the social media coverage. Thank you for your videos.
Not many normal people in society are actually as mentally and emotionally unbalanced as those generally getting heated on Twitter ...
@@Jester-Riddle Exactly Stephen...and sadly there WILL come a time when a juror or jurors will be referring to Twitter and all that ridiculous venting of opinions and expressions of hatred.... that is when we will lose the impartiallity of Trial-By-Jury..... "12 JustPeers"? No longer.
No longer will the accused be judged by his/her peers...but by people with the attention span of a gnat.
Therein lies the real danger to Justice.
And it is a very real danger being posed by, what I refer to as, "Anti-Social-Media".
Was your case a super famous celebrity with a unbelievable fan base? Also what everyone has missed is that the jury member believed that they was both abusive and that means that the op-ed should of been deemed to be truthful.
@@ianmckinney3446 Good Morning Ian, no, it wasn't a celebrity trial, it was a criminal conspiracy with 15 defendants and only famous in the city it was tried in (though it made national news briefly when it collapsed). However, the juror in Virginia said that the celebrity and social media factors were discounted by the jury. The Court (the Law itself) cared not one jot that celebrity was involved. I have always thought that courts are the great equaliser (what it costs to get recourse under law is another subject).
I did not miss that the juror says both were abusive. But his use of "abusive" in this context does not even start to approach the actual physical and psychological abuse that was proven to have been committed by Amber and proven not to have been committed by Johnny, hence the op-ed was correctly deemed to be defamatory. Their life was argumentative, chaotic and plagued by drug and alcohol use; I think that is what the juror was alluding to. Anyway, the word choice of a single juror (assuming he is a juror) does not overturn 6 weeks of court trial.
@@ianmckinney3446 I think it was the sexual violence allegations that really lost it for amber. That raised the stakes incredibly, was a late allegation, and seemed very unviable as she told it. She would probably have won otherwise 🤷♂️
Objection = “Cut!”
Ruling on the objection = “Action!”
I am so glad the jury was a rational group of people -I love listening to your commentary
I had never heard her name before all this started and from the little I saw, I was subsequently really quite surprised to find out that she is an actress. I found her very unconvincing.
I do like most of the Marvel films but some of the acting in that (Hulk after they turned him into a comedy character as just one example) is just as bad or worse imo. Before her surgery (whatever she's had done, botox, lips etc) she was extraordinarily beautiful, and whatever they say the 'casting couch' in Hollywood was how most of them made it at all...
The funny think about the donation question, is donations have nothing to do at all with the defamation case. It's purely about her character. Had she responded in court "no, I really wanted to donate that money, and I believe one day I will, but I just haven't been able to", she would have passed with flying color. Instead, she kept trying to weasel her way out of it. She could have even said she changed her mind because her career wasn't taking off, whatever. But her actual response just made her impossible to believe.
I don’t think she could have because they also have her under oath telling a judge she had donated it all
EXACTLY!!!! perfectly said!!
Problem is: if she could do that, to admit fault, her name would NOT be Amber Heard.
I disagree with this take. The next question would have been the same which is "Why were you unable to donate the money?". The result would be the same.
She had claimed publicly that she had donated the money because she "wanted nothing". The donation issue was to establish that she is a liar. There was no getting any flying colors on that scenario.
The funny thing about it is what she is effectively saying is “just because I lied repeatedly publicly, doesn’t mean people shouldn’t believe me”. Ya lied! That inherently makes you unbelievable in a rational world.
Cognitive dissonance?
I love the term "crocodile tears". Crocodiles eyes tear up when attacking another animal.
She never shed a damn tear. Not a damn one. A famous cheating croc to be sure.
Yet the expression is an old one which has a list of words that in the end mean fake.
That's great trivia, I didn't know where the saying came from.
I love the root of sayings, like three square meals ect.
Yes..Fake tears are "crocodile tears"...fake smile is "crocodile smile".
Yet ... still, where WERE the actual tears?
You may be star struck when you see a major movie star in a casual situation. But when you are a juror in a court trial, and you hold the power of judgement over anyone, including a famous movie star I think that would psychologically change your power dynamic significantly. You simply wouldn't be viewing them as a movie star, but as someone you have to judge. So I think the "Star struck" argument is complete bullshit.
Also, jurors are made very clear, that to openly bias themselves will not only disqualify them from the jury but could also render them in contempt of court, which could have serious consequences. Its no joke to be called to jury duty and they know its no laughing matter.
YUP BUT THE WORLD ACCORDING TO AMBER IS EVERYBODY LIES AND TWISTS THINGS AND DOES STUPID LIKE ME DONT THEY LOL
When you consider how AH testified her entire demeanor indicated that she was much more inclined to histrionics and therefore much more likely to instigate violence as well. Her over the top audio rants and fake sobbing simply looked like a temper tantrum
This juror is helping me cope with the craziness we all witnessed. I worried about them because it was all just too much. Thank you for breaking it down for us. Ms. Heard is creating her own language as she goes along and expecting us to blindly accept this. God protect Johnny and his family. I truly am worried for him. She’s not going to like being out of the limelight and being right. It’s an addiction for her.
jury were fed up of her looking at them during the questions and put them off even more!bad move we saw it,well over the top.
I worried because two of them were wearing masks, so they clearly believe the most outrageous lies and cannot critically think.
SOUNDS LIKE WHAT OUR GOVERNMENT AND CURENT ADMINISTRATION IS DOING TOO
Usually when an alleged victim is on the stand the judge would ask if they need a moment for composure but nothing was said. AHs emotions were and are so inconsistent and unbelievable. The no tears are also a dead giveaway. It reminded me of the Susan Smith case when she was talking about the "kidnapped" children.
We a
And there was an alleged 'road rage' murder case in the UK where a woman claimed that someone had killed her boyfriend in a road rage incident. She and the police made a public appeal for information, but the fact that she cried but with no tears immediately put the police on to her, and she was eventually found guilty of murder.
The only time that I thought she was genuinely crying in the trial was when she said 'I don't want to do this' and I believed completely that she didn't want to be in court being revealed
I took her alleged conditions into account when I watched the trial. Dr Curry was very helpful to me. I took her changeable emotions into account, and Dr Curry said Amber also didn't tend to use "I feel" statements.
So for me, I gave Amber Heard a heck of a lot more leeway than I normally would do. I allowed for the flowery language AND her changeable emotions. For me, she was still not credible.
I agree with this juror. They were both toxic to one another. But what destroyed her credibility for me is that her testimony, behavior, facial expressions, cadence in her voice, her neediness and fear of him abandoning her DO NOT MATCH that of a true victim of DV.
She tried to show up Johnny to prove to him she could act and the world laughed at her. If that doesn't back up what Johnny told her about being a hack I don't know what does. And I think that's what hurts her the most, that she really was shit.
I wish that jurors could speak in the U.K...it's a fascinating insight.the strongest witness AGAINST Amber was Amber
THER WERE NO JURORS IN UK IT WAS ONLY THE DUMB STOOPID JUDGES DECISION
I'm glad that the jury saw what us onlookers saw.
I actually don’t totally understand why many said they are abusive to each other. It seems that Depp only responded to AH’s abusive and aggressive behaviours, and he even asked if her toes were ok when being yelled by AH. He also didn’t want to go to court to trash her reputation. He did send and say some unkind things to her, but they seems to be just responding to her evil craziness.
Ditto 👍
The self control JD has while listening at Amber’s fake cry, fake stories of being abused and tons of lies. I’m not sure if I can just sit and listened liked JD without objecting out loud. We were lucky this trial was live.
It simply comes down the fact that Amber refuses to understand that the jury had the task of making a CHOICE who to believe.
And they CHOSE Johnny. They had the power, not Johnny and not her.
Just want to clear some things up....As to Johnny's verbal abuse??? no some of us cuss like sailors normally when we're scared , mad, frustrated, or normal talk. It's how we talk, that's NOT VERBAL ABUSE.. It's NOT verbal abuse. As to name calling I don't think he actually called her names to her face like she did..... That was just two men venting to each other.
I think the fact the JD was abused as a child and watched his father be abused and never fight back but just take it, is the reason he did the same thing. I also believe, that he went back to using the drugs and alcohol to basically check out. AH never owned up to doing drugs and apparently lots of alcohol. He said he didn’t want to fail her and that everything AH did was the same things he witnessed his mother doing. JD still took care of his mother until she died despite all the abuse. I have never seen anything either of them were in and didn’t follow the whole trial. But it was clear just by watching them in court, who the more aggressive one was and it wasn’t JD.
The article that goes along with video is also very telling. Goes into far more detailing. Well worth the read. Thank you for you commentary and all your hard work!
She is delusional, thinking she could cry and lie and get away with it.
Very sad really.
You and the juror are on point! Love your videos! Common sense, etiquette, professionalism and realism go a long way. Thank you for your responses. Can't wait to see Johnny's appeal in the UK if there is one. Would love to be a fly on the wall for that one. Hope you do commentary on it!
I'm glad this juror spoke out. I've been so angry and disgusted that Amber and her attorney would accuse the jury of misconduct without one shred of proof. Maybe now, this juror has shutdown that line of BS.
That's what happens when you lie..... You cannot show real emotion... 😂
She wanted to look like an Saint by saying she donated and wanted nothing but really wanted the money for herself.
She did not donate a thing, my recollection from the trial was that the $200,000 the charities got were from direct payments from Johnny, with her needing to pay the balance of $6.8 million. He probably knew she was full of 💩 and would never pay.
@@nicpic1985 Didn't Elon Musk make one payment on her behalf too?
@@kimchi_b Now that you say that I think so yes, which makes it even worse highlighting she was never gonna pay a dime.
@@nicpic1985 She made two separate payments of $250,000, one to each charity. 2 payments were each made by Depp and Musk ... Ask if you want the amounts.
@@Jester-Riddle that is still not her paying though. $100,000 each straight from JD to the charities at the end of the divorce (so $6.8million remaining). Then $500k in her name paid by Elon Musk is not her paying. Unless she is going to show her refunding the Musk.🤷
I have 3 grown sons, 5 grandsons---it is perfectly conceivable, knowing them all of their lives, that they would never allow themselves to hit anyone not their physical equal---no elderly, disabled, no child, nor a woman.
That's only hard to believe for those who are violent themselves, like Amber Heard.
My Amber Heard was just like that. Able to turn the emotions on and off at will. There are so many similarities between the two. It has made me quite attuned to women like that and so it didn't take long for me to realise Amber Heard had issues. Like my accuser, it's also likely that she was watching the jury for signs of validation.
CONSTANTLY THE WHOLE TIME SHE TIRED PEOPLE OUT WITH ALL THOSE SNAP HEAD TURNS TOWARD THE JURY
My man, you need to get the deposition from 2016 and do a side-by-side and you can even add in some of the recordings do side by sides of her on the stand with this weeping and this bullshit phoniness compared with what she really is, the way she was before. These videos will be evergreen so when somebody clicks on it five years from now and can find the side-by-side, they can easily help to sum it up.
I wish someone would do that.. crazy copyright rules may apply. There's enough material to prove her lies and lack of integrity to make for a documentary SERIES!! I don't envy the person who pulls this off.
I am very disappointed that this juror said he thought they were both abusive in the relationship....obvisously AH was the violent and abusive one, I think AH supporters will use this statement to diminish AH responsability
Read the article that goes with the video. The video is click bait.
He said abusive not violent. He said "Johnny did not hit Amber". So it would cover verbal abuse (even in retaliation) and certainly not sexual violation with a bottle as she claimed.
He said they saw it as a husband and wife arguing. So basically got ugly at times.
@@hazelhadley-britt6396 Yeah that is how I view it, I mean I reckon 99% of relationships will have at least one heated argument where the insults are hurled for maximum emotional damage and days of regret and shame by the insulter.
@@nicpic1985 the video is click bait which is why we have said BBB should read the article with the video. It actually explains what heeant by that.
Thank you for keeping us informed
Great to hear reason and unbiased comments from the jury person and best of all it aligns with the thinking of many of us out in the community / world watching from afar (New Zealand). Thank you for making this clip it was reassuring the jury understood and made decisions based on evidence and what they saw in front of them!!!! Does AH not realise she herself is her own worst enemy NOONE else to blame. Someone said look in the mirror to her legal team, good advice for AH
There is a regional saying in the UK. “Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want”. Time to grow up Amber and finally join the adult world.
Brilliant post!
I appreciate your candor. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and expertise.
That's how she came across to me, I could see right through it. I grew up with a mother who could go from tears to rage in the blinking of an eye. It taught me to avoid people like that.
So did I. Crazy how it affects us as adults.
amber heard and her team were looking at social media. doesnt mean the jurors were doing the same.
when my sister and i did our jury duty, we just focus on what's presented in court. because that's what youd hope others would judge us on, if you we were ever in a court case.
the more amber opens her mouth, the more she reveals her deceptive intentions. good luck to the lawyers, and future partners that encounter her.
her discription of her nicole kidman interactions just reek of more lies.
without lies, amber heard dies. just like islam -whoa
LOL
Found you through Legal Bytes, love your videos! Thank you for your insights! Greetings from Uruguay
Excellent commentary. Thank you.
Love your analysis. Pls keep them coming! :)
I did Jury Service in the UK many years ago. We were told never to discuss the case...ever.
Thank you for your amazing coverage!
Awesome analysis and breakdown once again. Thank U! It’s a shame that someone close to her cannot or will not convince her to give up this charade.
After Amber's recent exclusive interview, she is now left looking even more stupid as many of her allegations have now been further trashed such as her fixation on Social Media influence, etc ...
Let's see what Amber says about that!!
The jury did what we all (apart from Amber) knew they had, they were attentive, they reviewed all the evidence and found the victim was telling the truth and the perpetrator was lying
The jury also saw what we saw... so glad he came out and spoke.
Great job again I really appreciate what you’re doing on this subject great videos great work I’m a little calmer today about this I’m so glad the jury person spoke out
So what a juror said! Hahahahaha LMAO 😂😂😂 the absurdity of that statement is obvious
I really appreciate the way you explain everything. You break everything down perfectly. I would love to see you take on an appeal in the UK.
Her lawyer was also a bad liar - she claimed Amber paid $6m for her legal team, which is absurd.
one of her attorneys was I think 350 per hr over 6 years plus experts I don't think it is crazy. Legal system is expensive.
@@tupacalypse88 I heard it was Amber Heards home insurance that paid out for her trial
@@tupacalypse88 Criminal Defense trial lawyer Bruce Rivers say otherwise.
@@coffee6783 I stand corrected 👍
@@tupacalypse88 Her home insurance covered it, from what i understand. They had a representative in court for the entire trial.
However ... *sometimes* insurance has a clause which removes coverage if the act was deliberate, and the 'malicious intent' verdict might have triggered that. So there is a chance she might need to reimburse the insurance company for the legal fees.
Thanks again Sir
A Herd’s gaslighting did nothing for the jury. She thought her over acting and overdramatizing was going to impress the jury. Instead it turned them off.
Thank you for your commentary. As an American, it's very interesting and informative to learn the diffences between our judicial systems.
You can be emotional for a while after abuse, but I ve never seen anyone being on/off emotion-wise cause of that… have more seen herratic emotions with people suffering other types of disorders (mental health mainly, or some addictions can have such effects though).
Ps: Sir, you look tired… thanks a lot for your videos but please take good care of yourself too
Really appreciate your videos. Very Informative. Thank you
I truly appreciate and enjoy all of your videos involving the Depp vs Heard case. Especially your thorough breakdown of the Uk case with JD and the Sun it was very much needed. It put things in perspective for us. 🙂🙏🏽
I enjoy your perspective and commentary. Thank you for sharing your views. I agree and I am so glad that the juror is speaking out.
Thank you for this video. There are only a few channels that are truthful with no click bait and you were one of them.
Good to here these few comments from an anonymous juror. Appreciate your reactions too.
Thank you for this.
🙏 for explanation 👍👍👍💖
Thanks for your info
The evidence could only result in one finding in my view. Amber and her lawyers could not destroy JDs credibility, and he was more realistic in all aspects. His team had also done their homework and knew exactly which buttons to press, and which experts to focus on.
Thank you for your insight
Not only did she not "give all the money away," she received the settlement tax-free. That was a stipulation of the divorce agreement.
Thank You!
I like the way you give a equal comment on both with hiding behind the one you really favors. Thanks for sharing and thumbs up 😊
Why would the jury want to see it all again after being in court all day.
I thoroughly enjoy listening to your opinions on this trial.
I find the differences between us and uk courts fascinating. Thx for your insights
The clear instruction from Amber's team for their witnesses and experts to look at the jury at all times must have completely creeped them out...Dr Hughes would have had me squirming in my seat if she kept looking at me, let alone 'Ms Crocodile'...
Amber has never been held accountable for anything in her life from adolescent till now. She has mastered the manipulation from infancy. This might be the first time she actually hasn't gotten her way regarding her narcissistic life.
Correct
Your analysis is straight up legsl. Thanks for that!
I totally agree. Sounds like the jurors saw the very same evidence We did. Thamk you for your commentary on the trial, now on the jurors reaction to accusations from Heard amd her team.
Yay, I was like 400!🤗
Love and support from Finland!🫶
Can you go through the whole article from the juror? Love your insight.
So glad this juror spoke. They got it right!
Great analysis of the photographs relating to the uk trial ,would like to know more, especially why some experts are suggesting that photographs which look visually apparently have the same meta data? Thanks
Are members of a jury in the UK allowed to speak out or give interviews ? Great channel!
The gma article goes into more detail what he said
👋 I have to admit I am a fan & faithful to a couple other channels BUT … I really wanted to wait to hear YOUR Assessments about …
Ambers latest Interviews &
Now the Jurors Statement 👏 Thank You 👍🏼 Thank You 👍🏼
“Again” for all your hard work 🥰 I also “ Again” I agree with YOU 100 percent 👍🏼💖
When you sit on a jury you understand what your duties are! It is drummed into you what your responsibilities are and that you can be charged if you don’t follow the law!
She lost and she doesn't want MR DEPP to move on. She is a manipulator and wants to still control him.
I'm very happy that one of the jury was able to say something. She needs to get on with her life.
I think it's so funny when they show AH pretending to cry in court ,and I mean from the belly laugh ,soooo funny