Ayn Rand is NOT a Conservative
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 14. 05. 2024
- Talking about how Ayn Rand isn't a conservative:
1. Atheism and religion don't go together (obviously)
2. Capitalism breaks tradition and nationalism with innovation, technology, globalism, free trade, immigration, and cosmopolitan multiculturalism
3. Individualism transcends typical labels and identities on both the right and left. Left and right are essentially the same with their insufferable collectivism (racism, nationalism, fascism, communism, sexism, feminism, genderism).
đŸ Social Media đŸ
LinkTree linktr.ee/Kasperanza
Twitter / kasperanzaa
Instagram / kasperanzaa
TikTok / kasperanzaaa
#aynrand #conservative #individualism - Jak na to + styl
I once had a friend who I thought had the appearance of someone virtuous and sensible, but they made many bad choices in their life which led to much strife for them. I agreed to rent a place together with them, only to find out that they were completely unreasonable and really quite aggressive for no reason. This makes me think that you've got a point in saying we should judge people on their choices, if I had done that with my friend, I would have saved myself from a lot of unnecessary stress and abuse. Maybe I gave him too much credit just for having the appearance of someone who is "on my team".
Yeah definitely, judge people based on character and mind, not group affiliation. I'm sorry your friend turned out to be a jerk.
People have to distort facts about Ayn Rand in order to criticize her.
Your video is too long when the difference is pretty straight forward. Conservative ideology is based around the core idea of ordained authority and superiority. Ayn Rand believes in hyper-individualism, even if it's to the complete detriment of everyone else. Which, in a great testament to Rand's ignorance, is ultimately self-detrimental as well.
Your comment is too short.
@@Kasperanzaa lol
@@hrodebertcoad9848 lel
You're the one that's ignorant. If individualism means everyone pursues their happiness, how is it to anyone's detriment? It's to everyone's benefit. Like what are you talking about? All other philosophies ask you to give something up, asks everyone to give something up, which would be to their detriment.
@@Kasperanzaa It's not hard to imagine how focusing solely on individual "happiness" (not the accurate term, but whatever) would end up with most individuals engaging in practices that would undermine other individuals, creating an overall toxic society of one-sided dealings. To believe that exacerbating such ideology to its extreme would somehow be beneficial is absurd.
Almost as if she's a libertarian or something. Who believed in Capitalism to the max.
She is not a libertarian. She called them âhippies of the rightâ.
@@hyperreal She was a hard core capitalist. HARD core. Yes, she liked law and order but she thought you could have both. She opposed the left on basically everything except religion. Come on.
She is a Conservative Libertarian. Aka, she wants little state and free enterprise. She was very much so on the right. News flash, the right had women on it. It's fine that not every woman agrees with you. Most of them hate my guts, then again, everyone does.
Edit: Seriously, just read her wiki article. Even that doesn't have the faintest clue she's anywhere on the left.
Yeah, but if you think critically youâll realize that sheâs more progressive and the left and right are both regressive in their own collectivist ways.
@@Kasperanzaa I agree. She's holding hands with Teddy Roosevelt right now.
@@culturalliberator9425 What is progress? Have you asked yourself that question?