Juror from OJ murder trial: I've always been comfortable with my decision
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 04. 2024
- Yolanda Crawford, a juror in the murder trial for OJ Simpson, tells CNN's Laura Coates about her experience being a part of the infamous trial.
#CNN #News
"They had no evidence on him" The man left everything but a signed autograph at the crime scene!
Firstly, the small window of time between murders and jumping in limo was ridiculously tight. When Park saw dark figure walk in house with AJ walking out 5 minutes later without sweet and looking clean.
The was no blood evidence on gloves belonging to OJ but the nanogram marked in wrist area which was confirmed as cross contamination due to spillage of one of OJ’s blood vials.
It was obvious detectives attempted to sweeten the case, which actually blew up in their faces.
Too much of the dna evidence was dodgy. If you watched whole trial you’d know why jury found him not guilty.
@@Will-nb8qk it's just easier to call you stupid
Thank Mark Furhman
@@Will-nb8qkbecause the law protects people from forced lie detector tests.
@@sfullernj Of course it is. Superficial and one dimensional minds can’t cope with combinations of words.
She let a murderer walk. What a disgrace
No she didn't. There was no proof
Yes no proof even until now rip legend
Go make peace with your God, your rotten soul may need it!
@@Lin.Stone.
Yea nothing says innocent like running from the police.
@@jaymass1178Running from the police? People can walk faster than that slow speed chase.
Two wrongs don’t make it a right. The Jurors decision was absolutely race motivated
It’s true but since then the hood still the hood and they didn’t get any better letting a murderer off. Here’s the kicker. Oj considered himself better than black people. He didn’t even consider himself a black man. He exploited an easily manipulated populous of people into getting him out of a double murder. She is lying. She feels guilt over the verdict. Especially after the civil suit, and the tell all book “if I had done it” with info only the killer would know. He also has a mental break which is why there was this mysterious other person present during the killings.
That’s speculation and speculation isn’t proof .
@@gts3004 Thirty years later, she still thinks he’s innocent. That’s only because they are the same race. I would have given her the benefit of the doubt if 30 years later she had a chance to redo then she should say he’s guilty.
@@AustindGreenwhy would she change her mind? OJ didn’t do it.
The jury had reasonable doubt based on the racist history and corruption of the LAPD and the overall incompetence of the Prosecution team in putting forward the racist Mark Furman and the gloves which didn't fit.
That jury was hell bent on acquitting the murderer.
Murderer? EVIDENCE Please!! 🤨
dealingthereal6922 A lab employee testified OJ’s blood was at the crime scene. When the limo driver arrived to pick him up he wasn’t there yet. Where was he if not on his way back from committing the murders? He’d already gone out earlier for food
@@georgialee6755 you/we don’t know who’s blood 🩸 was at the crime scene. The blood that was at the crime scene was NOT the blood that was sent to Cellmark laboratory for DNA analysis and testing.
When the limo driver showed up, OJ was, indeed, at home. You actually believe that when Alan Park saw OJ on his property that he was just getting back from freshly killing Ron and Nicole and that he managed to go upstairs; disrobe; ditch the blood soiled clothes from the crime scene; shower to get rid of any residual dirt and blood that was on his person; get dressed; and be downstairs, ready to go, all in a matter of five minutes tops?🤔 🤨
@@dealingthereal6922 Nicole's and Ron's blood was on OJ's socks. His blood was at the crime scene. Contrary to your paranoid rambling, we do know whose blood it was.
@@putler965 you’re more than a just little confused about the actual facts of this case. 1. Ron’s blood was NEVER “found” on OJ’s sock. 2. There was NO BLOOD detected on that sock until after 6 weeks of it being in police custody. (STRONG Inference being, that INITIALLY, there was no blood on the sock.) 3. The blood🩸on the sock contained EDTA. 4. Also, it was proven that that blood did not get on that sock at the crime scene, as it had soaked from one side of the sock to the other. This could NOT have happened had there been a foot/ankle in the sock when the blood got on the sock. Hence, the blood was PRESSED onto the sock, while the sock was laying in a flat position without an ankle/foot being in it. 5a. Indeed, there was blood at the crime scene, but the blood at the crime scene was NOT the blood that was sent to CellMark Laboratories for DNA analysis and testing. 5b. It was proven in the trial that the blood that was collected at the crime scene was switched out for OJ’s freshly drawn blood and THAT was the blood that was sent to CellMark Laboratories for DNA testing and analysis. Hence, the police pulled NO STOPS in assuring that OJ was the one pinned for committing these murders.
So, no, we do not know who’s blood was at the crime scene; but, yes, we do know who’s blood was DNA tested and analyzed.
Another juror admitted that they voted not guilty as payback for rodney king.
Wow
Jurors name please. Also, was that the sentiment of the two white jurors who also voted “not guilty”? Were they trying strike a blow to the man, in honor of Rodney King?
The real question is payback to who? Are people really that dense?
@@dakotaflower5926 to what people call "the man", black people feel the entire system is rigged against them, before the 90s. Then Rodney King happened and was fresh in people's minds. One of the jurors even gave the raised fist as the verdict was being read, OJ half heartedly responds to it by raising his hand when he sees it, look at the video...
@@dakotaflower5926 just white people in general. Just naked racism toward whites. They just straight-up think it's okay to kill white people.
She doesn’t feel that her assessment of his guilt or innocence was relevant. What the fuck did she think they were there to do?
Let a black man go free
To asses the evidence presented to them and make a decision, based on that. She did her job!
I watched the trial. I would've exonerated him also, even though I felt he was guilty. The prosecution didn't prove their case, and the defense did prove the cops were corrupt.
@@sean-hu2fo in the interview she flat out says they made up their minds before hearing the evidence.; ya knob.
To evaluate the case and evidence presented to them and whether it was proven without a doubt. Since when are jurors told to base their decisions on assessment of guilt or their personal feelings?
SO what about the shoes that proved he was at the scene covered in blood? In the civil trial, Simpson was found guilty because of those Bruno Magli shoeprints.
What about the framing of O.J. by the racits cop Mark Furman?👿☠
@@lindawilliams8715 Never happened. Simpson's house had Nicole and Ron's blood all over it. Judge Ito disallowed a lot of damning evidence. Too worried about more riots. Rest in Hell, OJ.
Cops framed him. They took samples of his blood.
That was the only defense OJs defense had. There's zero proof he was framed. Stop it. Why would they want to frame an old football player. He wasn't a celebrity at the time of his murder. Why?
No shoes covered in Blood. Also O.J. was wearing tennis shoes.
She’s always felt comfortable? Wow. Even after it became glaringly obvious he did it? Wow
They had a lot of evidence excluded. 10 lawyers on defense. Throw everything leading with race, at the wall and see if it sticks for huge millions pay check. Kato said jurors were waving at oj when he came in. He knew it was a lost cause.
I guess when you make a dumb decision, you stick with it. They were looking for reasons to not convict instead of to convict....
Dam shame she made her decision based on her skin color.
Was based on corrupt cops mishandling blood evidence. Period. Nice try though
You see! That’s some BS the klansman cop that planted the glove said on tape
No based on evidence. Only white ppl make decisions based on skin color
How do you know she did that? The prosecution dropped the ball. Not the jury's fault.
@@Wesker10000 they're just racist white ppl. They have no sympathy for when white cops are found innocent for killing young black males yet they all come here and bash oj
The fact this juror would go on television and double down is an insult. She contributed to a total miscarriage of justice.
No she followed the evidence THE GOAT innocent
What about rodney king??? Emmit till treyvon martin???
Hey petey looks like u guys get mad when the justice system works for us like it does for u guys 😅
@@pistolpyro97 yes, what about all those guilty people who got what was coming to them?
@@pistolpyro97
A jury decision isn't allowed to be made on emotions
Only the facts of the evidence
You chose not to accept that as a fact
It's considered influencing a jury
Three years, for contempt !
The disgusted look on Robert Kardashian’s face. They were best friends and never spoke again after the trial. He died of cancer also.
Well, now they’re reunited in hell
How do you know that FOR SURE?
Keep Speaking The Truth
Robert looks like wow this guy OJ pulled it off again
@@mob4336 Keep Speaking The Truth
O.J. had a track record of abusing Nicole. They had split, but like a typical abuser, he exploded seeing Ron with Nicole. Even though Ron was only bringing Nicole her glasses.
Fact...the judge denied Nicole's diary into evidence nor her 911 calls to the police for help.
There abuse also from Nicole, it was not one sided. I am sure Ron was coming for more than just to drop off glasses, he was coming to get some. That's what I think.
@@couponnation It's called "Self defense".
@@couponnation please tell me, in what ways did she abuse her abuser?
@@BillyColeII-dr6dk It called it takes 2 to tango. She was not the innocent flower the propaganda media made her out to be.
Mark Furhman BLEW THIS CASE
The jury blew this case. You literally had a juror give OJ the black power salute after the verdict 😂
@New_Orleans_Ghost_Hunter When questioned by the defense if he Mark Furhman had ever planted evidence FALSELY, Furhman pled the FIFTH. Good cops don't plead the FIFTH regarding evidence planting. FURHMAN BLEW THE CASE!
mark furhman should be in jail for 100 years for tampering with evidence and planting evidence😩
@@wolfgangvonuce9803 once he pleaded the fifth on the stand
@@New_Orleans_Ghost_Hunter So you would ignore the planting of evidence as a juror?
i will never forget the look on Robert Kardashian's face!!! He looked disheveled, disgusted, and mortified.
They were best friends and never spoke again after the trial. He died of cancer also.
bc he knew he was guilty and couldn't believe he got away with it, prosecution did a shtty job and jury didn't comprehend DNA
Plus the evidence that was provided was all circumstantial & weak at best. Officer Mark Ferman made it worst. They couldn’t prove without doubt.
Ojs blood at the crime scene and his boot print in blood wasn't enough? It was enough in the civil trial. More on.
Same way Rodney king family look,
Disgusting jury. Pack of cowards or worse.
😂
They had no choice but to acquit. The detectives carried the blood sample around the crime scene. More than a little sus for the LAPD since they have a long history of framing black suspects.
No jury in America could acquit at that point.
@@louc6635 Just remember your excuses when trump supporters make their excuses when trump gets away with his crimes.
@@MatthewShane-ro9id criminal cases are based on reasonable doubt. Civil cases are based on the preponderance of the evidence. Which is why Trump was found "liable" of being a rapist and defaming that woman he raped back in the 90s. That was a civil case. That's why his properties are about to be seized. He can't get the bond, not even from the criminal underworld, his friends in Russia. His criminal friends are giving him the finger now.
Just remember that when he's convicted in the case that starts on Monday lol
Trump's crimes are more obvious than OJ's🤷🏿♂️@@MatthewShane-ro9id
This lady is nuts.
Doesn't matter. Reasonable doubt was all over the place in this case.
She is not nuts. She rationally and reasonably explained her decision to acquit. It may be difficult to accept, but as soon as Mark Furhman pleaded the 5th on planting evidence, the game was over. He could have pleaded the 5th to using racial slurs only, but he pleaded the 5th TO BOTH, which introduced reasonable doubt. Regardless of whether O.J. killed those poor people or not, the woman did what she was instructed to do under the instructions of the court, like it or not. That is why the deliberation was so short, because all the other evidence didn't matter (unfortunately) if the first cop on the scene pleaded the 5th to planting evidence. This is not complicated. Rather, it is following the law as a juror, which she did.
marvinolds6671 He had to plead the fifth to both. Once you plead the fifth once you have to for the remaining questions. In CA if an officer of the court is found guilty of planting evidence in a capital murder case the officer is eligible for the death penalty. At the time of these murders Fuhrman and his white partner Brad were actually working to get a black man OFF on a murder charge from the prior fall. They succeeded and then the murder went unsolved. Made no sense he’d frame a rich and famous guy. And where did they get OJ’s blood to frame him? He was on a plane.
@@georgialee6755 '' And where did they get OJ’s blood to frame him?'' oj had his blood drawn by the authorities when he got back and his sample went missing
@@georgialee6755 if you plead the fifth to something that means you did it. nice try
Evidence was overwhelming no matter what Furman did
Emmitt till
@@my98-ot7jjOj Simpson
well all the evidence goes out the window when he’s first on the scene and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence in the case.
@@my98-ot7jj What has this got to do with the travesty that happened to Till? OJ should not even be mentioned in the same breath as what happened to Till.
@@TheJordan97971 he pleaded the fifth on ALL QUESTIONS because the prosecution abandoned him after the tapes came out, nobody would rep him, he was up there on the stand with no support, so he pleaded the fifth across the board to give the defence nowhere to go. The result made him, and the department look bad, but it would've been even worse if he answered one question, then pleaded the fifth on another. The prosecution failed, they had a duty to defend him, and they could have done that by bringing up Aarick Harris, a black man arrested for murder in 94 that Fuhrman saved from death row by proving his innocence. Most ppl don't know that story.
We all know that OJ did it...
The first time I met OJ Simpson…
First of all you and we know nothing. None of us were there. So it's opinion not fact. Secondly it isn't about what you "know!" It's about what you can prove. If it was so clear as day that he did it, just so easy to know when you weren't there. Then it wouldn't have took too much to get a guilty verdict
Nicole was nearly decapitated, yet there was no blood evidence found in Oj's home, car or clothes. Please make that make sense? Everyone wants him to be the killer because he's unlikeable and abused her. Where is the evidence?
Tell that to the blacks who still believe Oj was framed and so called not guilty
@@sonicjet7759 Nothing funnier than someone liking their own comment just to see a number next to a 👍🏾 ⬆️. Sins of the past came storming back in the case. Fact is, he was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Same goes for when trump goes on trial…if he is found not guilty, that will be a fact.
this lady is and was delusional
Why
@@shermandudley5548 if I have to explain it to you...
@@iluvgalinayou can’t explain it.
Why because a black man wasn't sent to jail.
Whatever happened to, "respect the juries decision." Amazing!
You were hoping it would die down so your shame would be obliterated.
It won't be.
Perfect comment!
EVER
So the prosecutors won't look like fools forever....
It never will be.
This lady is the definition of “I’m too embarrassed to admit when we messed up”. Makes perfect sense it’s on CNN
@lawrence6972. I bet it never makes any sense on Fox Fake Networks. I'm sure that MAGA Nation minions will understand: "If it doesn't fit, you MUST acquit". That will be taught in law classes for a century to come.
"If it doesn't fit you MUST acquit". Let the Fox Fake Networks sleep on that for the next century.
CN has nothing to do with this former juror saying how she felt about OJ trial 28 years ago.
@@user-cz5lj2vx1f it makes sense it’s on CNN because they can’t admit they’re wrong either, not because theirs a correlation genius.
@@user-cz5lj2vx1fCNN sucks fake news
The guy wrote a book "If I did it" with the words "I did it" in blood red
The Goldman also changed words to last part after a judge gave right to it don’t leave that part out
Geez...The Goldman's made that change after they got control of the book rights.
Watch the video about the hypothetical confession. Wow.
Are you really so dense as to not understand that a books cover is made by the publisher to be sensational? Also the whole book is known to be ghost-written and it's senario is nonsense and a cash grab that Simpson entered into after the civil verdict. Anyone who actually sites this a evidence is a fool.
It's a confession. He remembers some parts, and tries to put hypothetical for others. It was an admission of guilt
If OJ didn’t do it then who did? Why wasn’t there a further investigation?
CIA
Coverup
Kato? Why did he put the glove on
@@kurtmanning2667😂😂😂
They never ask Nicole friends who she party with and brought drugs from to come on the stand.. I’m sure they knew something.
Hope those jurors can’t sleep at night.
The woman who said they had no evidence on him was either delusional or doesn't know what she's talking about.
Great woman OJ Great man
like the white detective has all the evidence needed to solve the case but he wants more and the black prosecuting atty ask to wear the gloves which doesn't need to, like the white detective he don't need to provide more evidence they already got em but they though what they have is only circumstansial evidence.
Exactly!!!! because they did have evidence, his blood matched the crime scene!!
Interviewer: *Yolanda, is the earth round?*
Yolanda: *I just don't know...but there are reasonable doubts.*
Yolanda = DUH!!!
in order to convict guilty, it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt. they had reasonable doubt.
@@User-ue2li A paid defense attorney claiming there are reasonable doubts does not mean there are reasonable doubts. In this case, there was *no* doubt whatsoever as to his guilt - reasonable or otherwise.
@@CINEKYD_MEDIA_ARCHIVE there was a reasonable doubt
I'm shocked that anyone from that jury would have the nerve to admit it in public.
Those were some of the dumbest people on the planet.
Nobody dare say anything though.
Why? Do you Not feel the same about the woman who accused Emitt Till of harassment or the 2 men who got away with the Brutal murder of a 14 year old.
@@ECW1153 I'm not sure what your point is. I'm talking about the sheer ignorance of a jury that ignored concrete evidence that OJ was guilty. Just a fraction of common sense is all they needed but obviously didn't have it.
Not surprised...the smart jurors figure out a way to get off jury duty
It's hilarious that you would accused that jury of being "dumbest people on the planet" when in fact all white juries are so prevalent in this country and notorious for letting white perpetrators off the hook for harming black folks. Kyle Ritterhouse murdered two white folks the same as O.J was accused of and he walked free and that jury was basically all white. Are they too some of the "dumbest people on the planet !!!???" .
Of course she’s never going to admit it. Liar
OJ was the killer 🩸.
Absolutely positively the Jury knew this but not beyond a reasonable doubt after that idiot Marsha and that cop Furyman screwed the fucking pooch.
No he wasnt
Maybe
Well if just go on your feelings, but to convict you need some kind of evidence
@@vsedai try reading...
You mean you took revenge and let a murder go.
I guess she did
Great woman
They was no evidence that they could use to link him to the killing...and my favorite part is the best evidence came FROM the police.
@@my98-ot7jjthat's what I say to cops that kill her kind
I am no OJ fan but some people seem to forget Mark Furmond. It was quite reasonable to believe evidence was planted by that white supremacist. He lied on the stand then had to take the fifth. OJ may have indeed done it, you have to admit is ironic that a white bigot helped get him off.
She helped get a killer get away with the murder of two people. He was also a proven abuser of Nicole because she called the police many times after he had beaten her or had locked her up. She should be ashamed, so I’m shocked that after all the analysis and additional evidence that in part wasn’t allowed to be presented during the trial, she still claims to not be sure if he was guilty or not.
And then she claims to be surprised to be put on a couch beside Nicole’s sister on a talk show. The actual surprise is that she still didn’t admit her role in letting a killer go free on national TV.
you sat here watched the whole thing and commented if you don't like what she did/says turn it off😂
@@noluhh.j4326 If I didn’t watch anything I disagree with, I wouldn’t see anything I disagree with or give myself the opportunity to learn and evolve, so turning videos off that I don’t agree with would be stupid of course. In this example all I learned is that she didn’t learn anything new and still thinks she made the right decision, even in hindsight, which I think is valuable information.
Great woman. OJ Great man
@@my98-ot7jj Bless your heart..😆 🤣 Definitely a Biden voting Democrat
She can’t admit it. She will die denying she freed a murderer.
She's a monster too then. Who vetted her?
Not guilty period
Prosecutors messed up but in the end, if you look at the case, GUILTY!
Not when the lead cop pleads the 5th under oath asking if he ever planted evidence. 😂 Jury made the right decision. It was the same conclusion I came to while watching the trial from my living room.
Exactly!!! You can’t base your decision on one bad cop when there is a pile of evidence- and this is what they did
@@Berryationsthere was an entire history of racist brutality and corruption within the entire LAPD and it got exposed in this trial.
@@meansnowflake political fueled delusion at its finest
@@Berryations What pile of evidence when you exclude what mark furman touched?
"I let a murderer go free and I met the victim's sister! Injustice for me!!!"
stop talking please, you'll be doing America a favor
@@noluhh.j4326He is right. Do America the favor of shutting your mouth.
The juror doesn't care about 2 people's lives. Simple as that.
She knows full-well that he did it.
What evidence?
And don’t say what was planted by the Hitler Cop
Lots of people just don’t have common sense
*Oh, so she was there?* There was Planted Evidence at the Scene. The LAPD Admitted to planting evidence so what is this woman talking about. There was plenty Reasonable doubt *especially the Timeline given by Kato, OJ's house guest. Kato knew the timeline was impossible for OJ to have murdered 2 people and gotten back to meet the limo driver* at the time he did. *She was NOT the only one who agreed he was NOT Guilty.* Too much Dirt went down with the Botched LAPD Investigation.
@@michaeldavis5155 exactly
She's never changed her story or position and I agree with her. The case was a bunch of nothing, no proof at all
She and these others who acquitted that clown should be ashamed of themselves.
They let him off because he was black, rich and famous
RIP Juice
RIP OJ
Let him off because he is black? Thats a new one
It was also the time… what was going on in the world. If his wife was black his ass would’ve been under the jail
And Had GREAT LAWYERS#WHAT WE ALL WANT IF WE ARE BEING PROSECUTED
She is going to hell for sure. Justice will come. No life in the hereafter.
Great woman. OJ Great man
If she ask for forgiveness she'll be okay
@@123456CBOY Love is like violence to evil.
🤣🤣💀you are that mad
🙄
Evidence??? GIRLLLLL I hope she can sleep at night wasn't there blood at the scene?? Come On
Watch the trial before jumping to conclusion
You'd be surprise about evidence that contradicts the prosecution. A strange fact is that dozens of witnesses after the murders got OJ's autograph and his finger was not bleeding. Also, the Bronco should have had much more blood in it IMO. I think OJ may have visited the scene but I believe (just like later in his Vegas robbery) he beought someone with him to do the dirty work.
Actually I hope she can’t sleep !
@@MsRocker961 For making the legally correct verdict? Remember - planted and contaminated evidence, no witnesses.
The police and the DA botched this case. Plain and simple. Terrible investigation, behavior, and advocacy. He was found not guilty, not innocent.
100% true
Yes, but the evidence still pointed directly to him and only him!
@@BerryationsIf there is a shred of doubt, a juror’s responsibility is to render the defendant innocent.
They had overwhelming evidence and if it was a white nobody he'd be in jail and I think we all know it
The Prosecutors were up against a bunch of the best lawyers money could buy - a bunch on Con men seeking fame and more fortune at the time!
So, because the "glove didn't fit," it was impossible for O.J. to have committed murder while wearing a small, tight fitting glove? Really???
The glove had sat with dried blood on it, and he was wearing plastic gloves over his hands … Darden made a massive mistake that exemplified how the prosecution thought it was a slam dunk. Of course OJ did it, even the juror believed that.
Whoever killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman was probably also involved in the murders of Goldman's friends, Brett Cantor and Michael Nigg.
you must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. If he didn't put on said glove. They cant say with certainty that he did it via the rules of evidence and reasoning. That would be flawed.
He put on surgical gloves and spread his fingers apart while taking part in the glove theatrics, it was obvious they purposefully made the gloves look too tight. 🙄😑
@@VaporValkerie Defense attorney Johnny Cochran told the jury, "If it doesn't fit, you MUST acquit." O.J. managed to put the glove on in the courtroom. Would that tight glove have rendered him incapable of killing anyone in the courtroom, if he was also in possession of a knife? Reason is why logic makes sense. A tight glove isn't sufficient "reasonable doubt," in view of the overwhelming entire body of evidence. (Maybe he intentionally wore a small glove while committing the murder. Maybe it was the only pair of gloves he could find, at the time.)
He had a white glove underneath, of course it will be tighter.
Keep crying 😅😅😅
AND leather SHRINKS when exposed to moisture.
so why didn't the prosecution take that into account before making OJ try them on? They didn't HAVE to. But it was a spur of the moment decision by the desperate prosecution.
Why did she feel ambushed by Kim Goldman maybe it’s her own guilt that she was uncomfortable about don’t blame the victims.
No guilt about her decision she just said that on the video!!!
OJ is now roasting in hell 😈.
How do you know that?
You mad 😅😅😅
He is looking up at us.
@@my98-ot7jjyou like men who beat and murder woman. Says a lot about you.
And soon you will be too, say hi to your father Satan for me
There was plenty ,plenty,plenty of evidence. 😡😡😡😡
That was tainted, tainted, tainted by Mark Furman when he pled the fifth.
Same for Zimmerman, the men who beat Mr King. I could keep going..!!!
@@Hooderaw 🤣🤣
@@Hooderaw Just WOW
An iq test should be done on prospective jurors.
Low education works wonders for jury selection. 😂
Oh awesome 😂😂😂
Sure does, we saw that in the George Zimmerman trial, for example. 😏🙄
@@brettsfav4 Zimmerman was attacked by the racist Martin. Being followed isn't grounds for assault.
Don’t forget those gloves were rare expensive Italian leather gloves you could only get in Italy where he had been a couple years before.
I think you mean the shoes,I think the gloves were Isotoners?
Emmitt Till
@@my98-ot7jj Why do you keep responding to people with "Emmitt Till?"
@@BarryMaplebecause y’all white master got away with murder too😂
Not true - they were made for Bloomingdales in the US, but they were still a fairly rare model. A receipt for these gloves, purchased by Nicole, was put into evidence at the trial.
“Based on the evidence that was show”. Lady there was plenty of
It, and you let a potential murderer walk because of his race.
Not potential
How does that woman live with herself.
You had a juror that admitted that you all made the decision on this to get the world back from Rodney king
Just proves that Oj's most important dream team member was their jury consultant. Get the dumbest , least critical thinker people you can find *with a sliver of racial hatred* and you get the win.
Seems to happen often.
Exactly! They needed the most ignorant jury panel to win. What gets me is there was not even one that had enough brain to say “what the hell is up with all of this blood from the victims on his possessions and property” seriously the blood alone was irrefutable. But they took the LAPD. Is setting him up route. WOW! To think one day possibly your life may lay in the hands of idiots!!
This juror just proves that if you are born without a brain you will never have one . After over 30 years to think about what she has done she still thinks that cold blooded killer is innocent . He has a one way ticket to hell and maybe she should go with him for what she did. The families of the victims have gone through hell and will until they die.
Hahahaha, oh boy!
Emmitt Till
Amen💯
Your so blind you can't even stay on script, the Prosecutions claim was HOT blooded murder, aka a crime of rage. And frankly it only the Goldman family which has been persecuting Simpson for years, Nicoles family which actually knew Simpson has been completly silent.
💯
That juror is full of shit. They ALL knew he was guilty.
I guess so
She can barely answer Laura Cotes questions,without sounding awkward.
They all thought he was probably guilty but when they found out the detectives picked up ojs blood sample from the lab and transported it BACK to the crime scene, they had to acquit. The Rampart scandal had just happened and the LONG history of the LAPD framing black suspects meant there was HUGE reasonable doubt. If the blood evidence was faked, ANYTHING could have been faked by the LAPD.
Acquittal was the only option. That was on the detectives who were in the habit of doing sloppy work and framing black suspects on a regular basis.
@@louc6635 . BS
@@Kaharris.96 Cope, that's reality
That juror must have been so worried about the murderer on the loose that’s never been caught … right?
This woman should be ashamed of herself
you should be ashamed of yourself for taking time to watch it and comment on it
@@noluhh.j4326I guess so noluhh..
@@MatthewShane-ro9id Matthew Shane 😭 such a great name
@@noluhh.j4326 I think so
Just look at her. She looks miserable, she probably hates herself as much as she does everyone else she has blamed for being a failure her entire life.
She has to live with her choice, that is her punishment.
Emmitt Till
I doubt she cares
Being comfortable with her decision is a hell of a lot different than making the correct, and obvious decision. And how could you be surprised that this case has a lot of attention still? You allowed someone that decapitated a woman and brutally murdered a gentleman go free.
Umm not guilty
They made it a racial thing rather than relying on justice.
NO white people are making it a race thing.
No matter who the murderer was, this juror has correctly identified that the jury's sole job was to rule based on the evidence presented to it at trial and assess whether there was reasonable doubt about whether OJ was the murderer. That is unimpeachably correct. And again, regardless of who the murderer was, it cannot be considered irrational for a jury directing itself correctly in that way to conclude that there was reasonable doubt about OJ's guilt, given the way the police witness at trial refused on grounds of self-incrimibation to answer whether he had ever planted evidence. The juror comes across as totally level-headed. She openly admits the possibilit that OJ did it, but correctly says that thay was not a lawful basis for finding him guilty. Her admisssion that the jury were going to assume the gloves fit OJ perfectly if the prosecution hadn't needlessly got OJ to try them on has the ring of truth, she has nothing to gain by saying this, and again it all tends to confirm the reality that - even if OJ did it - the prosecution and preceding police investigation were conducted so poorly that reasonable doubt about OJ's innocence couldn’t be excluded. Little comfort to the victims' families, but the jury did exactly what the law required. If they acquitted a murderer, that isnt on them.
If there was reasonable doubt in that case, there is reasonable doubt in 95% of murder cases that hit the court. You have the notion of "reasonable doubt" a little bit twisted it happears.
@@77Ronin_your stats are off. But even it they were true, then the correct conclusion would simply be that juries should acquit in 95% of criminal trials. It is a total violation of the rule of law to allow the results of an individual trial to be swayed by fear that conviction rates overall are too low. The fact you suggested this is itself sufficient ground to doubt you understand the concept of reasonable doubt in a legally correct way.
Very well said. I followed the O.J. Trial pretty closely & think he’s guilty. But I have a lot more contempt for the jurors who ignored obvious evidentiary problems with the Central Park 5 case and convicted innocence young men than I do for the O.J. jurors.
TY
The judge denied Nicole's diary, telling about her abuse and calls to 911 requesting help.....why?
The prosecution botched the case, and the police did some underhanded stuff to make sure he was toast, and got caught.
The way that two people can hear the same evidence and reach different conclusions is that one has a history of racism and hate, while the other one doesn’t.
Omg there was a lot of evidence
Emmitt Till
@@my98-ot7jj If you're going to repeat that 100 times, you should at least spell his name right.
Cop out! Of course he did it. Two things can be true at the same time. LAPD really Fd the case up. Awful policing. And ..... HE DID IT!
💯💯💯
Emmitt Till
@@my98-ot7jj Has nothing to do with OJs guilt. Emmitt Tills murder and the acquittal of those monsters is as horrible as this case when it comes to miscarriage of justice. And ALL of the defendants in both cases were guilty.
@@my98-ot7jj You saying that kind of proves that OJ was guilty and that the jury was just delivering payback
He didn't do nothing not guilty
I’ve no idea what this woman is on 🤯🥺
hopefully nothing that your on
@@noluhh.j4326 🥲🤣😂 seriously! You crack me up here! You must be on the same alien level as this woman 🙈🫣😯 2 people lost their lives at the hands of this man “ OJ SImpson “! Enough said 🫨 crazy 🤣😂🤣
What a level headed and honest woman. I respect she did not vote due to the King issue and respect she admits she did hear some jurors voted simply due to King 👍
bs, she decide it based on rodney
I guess so
Great woman
Racism doesn't exist though. Right?
"[The case] just doesn't seem to go away" yeah cause y'all got it WRONG!!
“Was OJ guilty?”
“Is the sky blue during the day?”
Reasonable doubt my a*s. His DNA was on everything, along with a lot of other evidence that he did commit the murders. She should be ashamed of herself for letting a double murderer free. If there is a heaven and hell, then she's going to the latter.
planted tainted evidence creates doubt.... Beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt... That's the part many people ignore, when they say "overwhelming evidence".. when evidence is planted, and the officer takes the filth when questioned, there's huge doubt.. So where back to, but you no he's guilty from the other evidence so convict him. It's not designed that way
If you want to get away with mrdr buy gloves that are a size too small.
if SHE SAW THE SAME EVIDENCE WE SAW THEN SHE IS DILLUSIONAL!!
That juror has blood on their hands
Legions of "other jurors in days past" have blood on their hands sending people of color to prison based on race. Enough to block out the sun.
Do we really want to start talking about blood in hands in light if this countries ongoing racist culture and extreme prejudice?
6:34 Kim Goldman: IF NOT OJ, THEN WHO?!
OJ did it.
I was 9 years old at the time and had no idea about race or how disappointing adults were. Even then, I knew as a child he had done it.
How did you knew? Nobody knows
Could you possibly disply your bias any more plainly, a 9 year old is going to go off nothing but 'vibes' they get from adults, not the evidence.
@@ayanolsson Evidence
Exactly!! You have the lead cop taking the 5th when asked point blank have you ever planted evidence
And that created more than reasonable doubt!
@@colinsparman26 only for anything he touched he was not the only cop working this case nor was he the only one collecting evidence
@@BerryationsHowever Mark ruined the whole case. He said he never used racist language even though he was caught in tape saying it
@@Berryations and so what he was the first one there..
Ain’t no way that doesn’t raise alarm bells taking the 5th
@@SparkleInYourEyes2024 maybe he was just singing along to a lil rap music...
I love what lawyer Gloria Allred had to say about all of this today. She highlights Nicole's suffering as a battered wife
This!!!!!
So if he didn’t do it what happened to the ongoing investigation if there ever was one? Two people were butchered. You would think there would be a hunt for the so called suspect. You jurors have blood on your hands and I hope you have many sleepless nights letting a sadistic murderer free
You do know he isn’t alive
Ask LAPD
Can not stand these people!
Don't worry, we love you right back!
@@sean-hu2fo 👎
Let me guess, Trump 2024?
@@taxfree4603 nope. I'm voting Biden.
I just can't stand hypocrisy.
Black people defending criminals is exactly how trump supporters act when defending trump.
@@taxfree4603 nope. I'm voting Biden.
Black community and MAGA community are the worst hypocrites on the planet
9 black jurors out of 12
If the roles were reversed it would be called white privilege
No one complains when it's the other way around. Wonder why??
@@thelovejoyshow568 Because they usually convict the killer
America is 13% black. The other way around would be the proper proportion.
Black privilege is real
Mad snow Devils 😅😅😅
You have over 100+ comments and only two subs, clearly nobody give an about you or your opinion so stay quiet and miserable 😂
Dam clowns 🤡
Ya lol that's why his football friend said oj confessed to him about being guilty. He even wrote a book about it lol what a joke lol
"It's hard to believe how two people can sit in a room and hear the same evidence yet come to two completely different thoughts."
Have you been paying attention to US politics lately?
This is ridiculous. What more evidence did she need? It's a slap in the face to the families of the victims to even put her on tv.
I believe they flat out just didn’t care about any of it
It's never gonna go away because you let a murderer walk free
Not at all means you never even considered Rodney King's case during deliberation. I have a hard time believing that, considering everything that was going on during that exact timeframe .
There's plausible deniability and full-blown denial. The claim that she "doesn't know" in 2024 shows she's the latter. He admitted it on camera in 2006, ma'am. Please wake up
Emmitt Till
OJ has never admitted to killing them stop lying
No proof that he did. LAPD proved that he could not have made it back to his house. This is a murder that they know what time it happened, and how long it takes to get back to O.J.'s house. No matter how they tried it, they could not do it. None of her blood anywhere including his car.
@@my98-ot7jj Stop cheapening his death.
No such admission ever happened.
They did have a "reasonable doubt". That being the racist comments of Detective Furman brought back memories of Rodney King case. F. Lee Bailey (Simpson attorney) is one who got this case dismissed when he interrogated Furman and that was all they needed to hear.
F Lee was masterful in that exchange. He let Furman lie through his teeth, then dropped the bomb on him.
Their was resonable doubt even before that.
@@kennethferland5579 So much reasonable doubt that they never found the real killer right? Delusional much?
Shouldn't mitigate the evidence though. They made it about race when he was a serial wife beater.
@@MsDidi38the lead detective, first one on the scene to collect evidence pleads the fifth to planting evidence doesn’t raise doubt??? be real lol
Bottom line. But how is that Fuhrman is not being considered in light of George Floyd.
Any kind of racism is injustice
Exactly 💯
Obstruction of justice.
Let’s not forget there was MONTHS of evidence and they “deliberated” for less than four hours
I dont believe she thought the glove fit before he tried it on for one second. I watch most of the case live. Hopefully the media can let this rip.
Those gloves fit and he probably used them because he didn't like them and knew he'd dispose of them afterwards.
If the glove don’t fit you must aquit
@@mantis10_surf85if you can’t spell we must expell!
Racist cops set him free
I think Robert knew he was guilty. His face said it all in the moment of "Not Guilty". She can pretend all she wants. This verdict was racially motivated.
Oj looked shocked as hell when they said not guilty. His face looked like he said “are u sure?”
Wake up people. Wake up!! This was about retribution for Rodney King! Even one the jurors said so!