Why "Luke" Changed The Genealogy Of Jesus Given By "Matthew"
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- This video explains why "Luke" changed the genealogy of Jesus as given by "Matthew".
The video presents conclusions based on primary evidence. It shows the answer to the genealogical problem is an authorship 'copyright' one, using gematria to present the name Kalpournios - as in Calpurnius Piso.
This video also explains the gematria answer to why Exodus 12:40 in the Greek Book of Jubilees states that Israel was in Egypt for 430 years before all the Lord's people left, instead of 400 years as given in Genesis 15:13.
The identity of Sextus Julius Africanus - www.henryhdavi...
The creation of the Septuagint - www.henryhdavi...
You see inconsistencies like this when writers forget exactly where they are in the story the are making up.
True. But also remember that the scriptures were read to the people and not by them. Therefore contradictions would only be known and seen by the writers.
Nah, not "made up." Just misunderstood by simpletons.
@@MichaelDBiggs Misunderstood? How do you misunderstand 2 different genealogies? Either one or both are wrong.
@@bartbannister394 or... You are wrong. Especially about the writers of Scripture "making up stories."
And believe, I come not from any viewpoint you've ever heard. As I believe less than 10% of what comes from most pulpitmen in denominational religion.
And... I teach from the Bible! 😉
this is one of the most in depth videos i have seen on this. thanks.
Please upload more! Came across this video last night. Very interesting what you were saying - great video! Great topics!
Thank you. I plan to upload another video based on content from my next book which I am currently writing.
At 12:42 you say that you cover the reason why Cainan is not included in the masoretic text in an article linked in the description.
I've searched in my browser your article with strg+f for the name Cainan, but couldn't find any results.
Is your explanation more of an abstract nature, or did I miss something else?
Thank you!
Thanks for your question. The comment about Cainan being in the Septuagint but not the Hebrew or Masoretic is an abstract comment. It concerns the authorship of the version of the Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures we have today, known as the Septuagint. In the link in the description, evidence is presented that indicates the original Greek translation was altered by the Pisos and Herodians to include statements that linked to Christianity.
Titus 3,9 "avoid foolish controversies and genealogies" 1 Timothy 1,4 "nor to give heed to myths and endless genealogies, which bring speculations"
I agree, when the evidence does not support a given genealogy.
Luke did not change the genealogy. The geneologies in Matthew & Luke do not conflict or contradict. They are of 2 people, Mary & Joseph. The genealogical list in Matthew, from David to Jacob-Heli (spanning about 1000 years), contains 27 generations of 40 years each, so as to comply with the 40 year royal generational standard. Luke, on the other hand, gives 40 generations at a more comprehensible 25 years each. Hence, Luke places Jesus in the 20th generation from Zerubbabel, whereas Matthew places him in the 11th generation from Zerubbabe. SUMMARY: Matthew--27 generations of 40 years from Solomon. Patriarchal--Zerubbabel's father's line. Luke--40 generations of 25 years from Nathan. Matriarchal--Zerubbabel's mother's line. Solomon and Nathan were both sons of David. Their lines converge at Zerubbabel and then diverge. Zerubbabel had two sons, Abiud and Rhesa. Matthew goes from Abiud, Mary's line. Luke goes from Rhesa, Joseph's line. Also, Mary and Joseph were related. Joseph was Mary's great-aunt Gadat's son. Mary''s mother was Hannah. Her father was Joachim (Yonakhir) the Elias patriarch. Joseph's mother was Gadat. His father was Heli, the Jacob Patriarch. His community distinction was 'Jacob'. "Jacob' was a title, so he would be called Jacob-Heli. Joachim's mother was Sabartia (Sabrath). Joachim's father was Matthat the Zadok. Heli's father was Matthan (descended from Mattathias (Tobias), the Temple governor.
Even the early church father's don't agree with your wishful theory. Both are Joseph's lineage. Mary father is a venerated saint and his name is not Heli.
Apologists for the conflicting genealogies of Jesus presented by (Mathew 1:1-17) and (Luke 3:23-38) have made the argument that the intentions of Mathew and Luke were never to present an accurate record of Jesus's family line but to TELL A STORY.
Luke wanted to show that the line of Jesus encompassed all of humanity thus went all the way back to Adam.
Mathew wanted to underscore the nobility of Jesus so his genealogy emphasized royal associations.
These apologists admit (without apology) that both genealogies are pure fiction invented off the cuff to make a point totally unrelated to the universally understood purpose for a genealogy which is to present a record of a person's ancestry.
This creative twisting of reality is another reason why it is so difficult (impossible) for an ordinary person to interpret the Bible's message.
The Bible was written by dozens of people with differing perspectives, levels of education, and psychological balance, all of which must be understood by the reader to grasp the message they are attempting to convey. The Bible was not written by a single God who wanted to convey a cohesive message representing a single perspective.
like~best upload!see u around, HenryHDavis,😈
In the end, Jesus is "the offspring of David" (Rev 22;16) , "born of a woman" (Gal 4;4), "born of the seed of David according to the flesh" (Rom 1;3).
The differences in genealogies only serves to keep people from truly "denying themselves, taking up their cross daily and following Jesus." (Luke 9:23)
If you're gullible enough to believe the New Testament rubbish, then you're an idiot.
So then why does it say in matthew that Mary was pregnant of the holy ghost?
@@chrishouseofdawid Jesus was both of the Spirit and of man. He most often referred to Himself as the "Son of Man."
Those who have accepted the call to "come after" Jesus, were born of woman and now have the "seed" of the Spirit in us.
The two realms - the physical and spirit realms - are currently separate. Except for Jesus. At His Resurrection, He became the "Firstborn from the dead" and is now a "Life-giving Spirit" in a "flesh and bone" body.
Oh, friend, there is so much more than we have known, as a whole, in the churches.
But the Lord had been unveiling the "mysteries of the Kingdom of God" since He first taught the Apostles, even to our day, and will continue until His manifestation at the "last day."
May we ever have "ears to hear what the Spirit is saying to the churches" and the determination to follow Him in the Way.
Amen.
@@adamdavis3361 interesting reply from someone who is willfully ignorant. How can you possibly call someone names simply because you are incapable of understanding them? You're like a child in 1st grade calling someone with a Master's Degree "an idiot" because they can't understand.
In this scenario, you are the child and I am the Master.
@@MichaelDBiggs At least I'm not gullible enough to believe in myths. I understand the evidence in the video. Biblical scholars are still trying to understand the dodgy fake genealogies. But by all means, publish your concrete peer reviewed answer...
Claudians shouldn't be ignored
I bet Luke changed the birthline due to the curse placed on descendents of Jehoiakim.
one was his biological son the other was the legal son as in the levitical law. your brother would begot but the son would take your name. the genelogically is explained.
The evidence suggests otherwise. I recommend you read my book. The superficial geneologies do not explain the 430 year timeline against the original 400 year timeline.
The Jews intermarried-but not too closely. That is what genealogies are trying to show. The house and sons of David are different. This is about showing who Jesus is and not historical perfection…
Explain the 400 and 430 years then genius.
TOO MUCH FOR ME TO FOLLOW...AND I NEVER DID UNDERSTAND HIS CONCLUSION...but with due respect to believers, there is way too much other stuff that makes no sense in the whole book....Really, if Jesus and Paul got the date wrong when the world would end, which in their opinion was about 40 years, why do you really need anything...
Whose conclusions?
Hmmm.... neither Jesus nor Paul predicted a date for the end of the world. Sounds as it your thinking has been influenced by Preterist theories, which have crept into denominational religion.
Thought he was the son of God?
That question needed resolving by the time Constantine gained overall control of the empire.
Claudius divius
Matthew and Luke were unaware of each other.
You obviously haven't read this guys work nor paid attention to the video.
U R clueless pal!
Wow, such a refutation backed up with evidence…😮🤦♂️