Baby Reindeer: Solicitor reacts to Piers Morgan’s interview with ‘real’ Martha
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 05. 2024
- Piers Morgan’s interview with the 'real' Martha from Baby Reindeer on Piers Morgan Uncensored took the internet by storm last night.
A solicitor specialising in stalking, Rachel Horman-Brown, gave her reaction to the interview on Times Radio.
You can watch the full interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored here: shorturl.at/emzRV
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
Piers I am really impressed with the sensitive but still journalistically thorough manner in which you conducted this interview. Top class.
SHE IS UNHINGED 😮😮
Its a mess. Both parties come out of this with a lot of questions. It made no sense how she recognised herself if the interactions were as limited as she claimed. Morgan should never have done this with someone so clearly unwell.
'I don’t think, I sent him anything '
SEnT fOm iPhoN
That made me LOL
Just when Richard’s life reaches some emotional equilibrium, he finally achieves financial reward and while he’s basking in success - here comes “Martha’ again 😜
The truth always comes out so it will come out soon enough
It’s disgrace that Netflix let this happen, also disgrace Morgan had her own his show.
How so with Netflix?
@@charliewalker9443 lake of compliance from them aloud real people to be found, law suits incoming
@@Thebearmre7 …….but Fiona came forward. People could only speculate it was her, prior to this. Just out of curiosity, do you think the guy who did the crime in episode 4 should be outed?
@@charliewalker9443 your taking what gad said is true and not his version of the truth. She only came out when she was hounded my internet and media. The whole point Netflix should have made it so no one would know who she is.
@@Thebearmre7 I would argue you are simply accepting what she said. She claims to be hounded by the internet, getting death threats etc. This is cliche victimhood 101 for this modern era. Perhaps she came forward because she sees the money he and the show are getting and wants a slice of it. 🤷🏻♂️ Not saying she is, but I wont accept everything she says. No one put a gun to her head to come forward. She chose to.
I am happy to be proven wrong though.
I really am curious though, as you seem smart, do you think the show has an obligation to hide the identity of the sex abuser in episode 4?
They shoulda made the show with unknown identities, preferably on both sides not closely resembling her.
photographic memory didn't look like it. five minutes of fame.
She’s nuts and Morgan is milking it as usual… What a horrid world we live in 😂
Well said- 100%
The world is a madhouse. Talking about mental issues. 🙄
I can understand that people on the internet could identify her. What I am perplexed by is how she is so sure the character is about her while also denying she ever stalked him or engaged in problematic behavior. I feel like she is avoiding revealing HOW she knew Martha was about her because it will confirm some truths.
right? i love it. it's absurd meta-drama and I want to see the conclusion to this.. it also has that Joan is Awful element to it in that I can imagine a season 2 retelling of this current story of real martha saying she's not martha but at the same time is targeting her... IMO all the outsider peers need to speak up on what they witnessed between the 2.
Bet she didn't do the interview for nothing.
250k
@@redballoonluke 250 POUNDS.. not the k
@@aurorasage7305😂
now she wants a million pounds ;-)
Why would you write a story about a stalker possibly reactivating the stalking activity again?
How can recording someone on your phone go to your voicemail
record it make a call from unknown number leave a voicemail playing back the recording to the voicemail
Really nmm for the amount if times and length he claims and when you leave a voice mail tends not be random talking for hours also she says she didn't bother with him or didnt srand at the bar where he worked fir him to record hundreds of clips leading to hours of voice males
Now interview a barrister specialising in defamations. What is the line between artistic depiction and private life and what are the options available to someone to clear their name?
Anonymity is the power of the Stalkers and predators, now that she is fully exposed the tides are are against her.
She said its not her. So why is she suing? Move along then. At this point I don't care if its true or not. I loved the series
Piers and Fiona are both consenting adults. I am glad I was able to see the real stalker and she's also much more palatable than the actress portrayal.
'I didn't send him 41,000 emails, I only sent him 40,999 emails ffs'
I'm pretty sure I heard her say that she'd contacted Piers. She would probably have slipped under the radar, other than where she lives locally, so i think she's after notoriety at whatever cost. Plus she knows he is a year younger (or older) than she is.... he'll be her next target!!
I am 100% sure that everyone is enjoying this. Specially her, Glad obviously is enjoying this, Netflix is enjoying this blow out to the "true story" thing, Morgan is LOVING IT obviously there isn't a more media w_ore than him, The Times now is milking it. But specially that woman is loving the attention she is getting. I dont know and dont care about her mental state, that is NOBODYS business but hers.
Is sending someone ton of emails really considered stalking or more like spamming/harassing?
Asking for a friend?
@@MissJnet sure, I have ton of friends, more than Richard
You sure she isnt a handler.
How can Richard Gadd play himself - how am I supposed to trust the narrative with that set-up? I watched the first episode - think I will ditch the rest, I don´t trust Richard Gadd.
Who’s the victim?
As a solicitor, you genuinely don't know what good it does to allow an alleged offender to publicly reply? Oh, no, sorry, it's a SERIOUS crime. It's "something like this," "something like stalking," not "somehting like shoplifting," so the normal human rights don't apply. Good luck appearing before a judge with that level of logic.
So who is the REAL VICTIM here in this saga???
Big ADVERTISING gimmick 😂
Polygraph test will settle it end of story.
They aren't very accurate though
No it wouldn't. She could easily pass a lie detector if she genuinely believes her own lies. Hence, not accurate.
Tell that to Jeremy Kyle😂
Let's face it, the lady is owed money. Whatever and whoever she is, the guy made a fortune off her. Who used who? And everyone knows how popular this series is and became. She has every right to sue for every penny. The writer could have drastically changed her appearance and quotes so it's a no brainer for anyone to find her, the real "basis". My sister manically will write thousands of messages to people off her phones etc some people do that. It doesn't really matter if the series is "true" and "oh she is really like that" the point is that there is no mistaking the likeness, the easily researched quotes and the profits he made exploiting her. She is owed money and Netflix should be paying her BIG time. Good for her for making herself public because it goes to show how close the likeness is. No one got HER permission to tell HER story. She should write her own series about this guy. I enjoyed the show but let's face it, he took loads of drugs, he played both sexes, he is "likeable" so what? He egged her on in many ways.
I couldn't disagree with you more. This woman has come out from under her rock because she can smell money. Google her. She has form .(Fiona Muir, or Muir-Murphy, or Murphy)
Very ill woman but enjoying herself to be in media's attention
This persons a bloody syops. And a handler