Scientists Simulate a Wormhole // NASA's Moon Infrastructure // China's Space Station Crew
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 04. 2024
- The best images from Artemis so far. More spacecraft are going to the Moon. Researchers have simulated a wormhole. China now has six people on board its space station
🦄 Support us on Patreon: / universetoday
00:00 Intro
00:15 Artemis 1 Images
www.universetoday.com/158874/...
www.universetoday.com/158945/...
03:37 More flights to the Moon
www.universetoday.com/158746/...
05:51 Moon infrastructure
07:10 Quantum Wormhole Simulation
www.universetoday.com/158896/...
09:55 More JWST images
www.universetoday.com/158820/...
www.universetoday.com/158941/...
12:41 Support us on Patreon
13:33 Black Hole Consumes a Star
www.universetoday.com/158919/...
16:17 China's continuous space presence
17:45 Another SpaceX SuperHeavy test
www.universetoday.com/158905/...
18:46 Q&A 200
• TOP Space CZcamsrs An...
19:37 Outro
Host: Fraser Cain
Producer: Anton Pozdnyakov
Editing: Artem Pozdnyakov
📰 EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Read by 55,000 people every Friday. Written by Fraser. No ads.
Subscribe Free: universetoday.com/newsletter
🎧 PODCASTS
Universe Today: universetoday.fireside.fm/
Weekly Space Hangout: / @weeklyspacehangout
Astronomy Cast: www.astronomycast.com/
🤳 OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA
Twitter: / fcain
Twitter: / universetoday
Facebook: / universetoday
Instagram: / universetoday
📩 CONTACT FRASER
frasercain@gmail.com
⚖️ LICENSE
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to use my work for any purpose you like, just mention me as the source and link back to this video. - Věda a technologie
Seeing that moon shot in high def... I love this thing so much
Amazing what can be done in a Hollywood studio isn’t it?
@ukraine7249 is that all you can say? Bot.
@@ukraine7249 i didn't know clowns could type with their big stupid gloves on!
@@ukraine7249 bro, my phone can take decent close up pictures of the moon in good quality 🤣 so think of the tech NASA has fs, get a grip.
The 3D printer using regalith sounds so cool!
I find it amazing how they managed to land on the moon with the earlier moon missions. They had such primitive tech compared to now.
They had good pilots, and real pilots, like Armstrong, who knew how to fly and figured out how to fly in space.
It's all good engineering and logistics at the end of the day. Its what you do with the tech you have that matters.
They didn’t. It was staged and fake. The firmament keeps us on Earth and Wernher Von Braun the Nazi father of NASA knew we never broke the dome and his tombstone has psalm 19:1 proving NASA knew and it was all a lie.
"... It's not a miracle, we just decided to go." - Jim Lovell. Apollo 13 commander.
It’s amazing what you can do with a Hollywood studio isn’t it?
This is one of your best shows. Great sound, great material, great quality, great knowledge in bite size. I learn so much from you!
Dear Frasier thank for include my question in 200 QA episode, I enjoyed a lot. I’m recently turned 65 and my experience is in medicine but my passion for science and math made keep looking for opportunities to learn. The past two years it’s been the universe. It’s incredible how much I’ve learned. TVM
Humanity's knowledge is still limited about our understanding of wormholes. Simulating something we do not understand is more like guessing rather than actual science based on empirical evidence from experiments.
I don't personally think it makes much sense to build above ground structures on the Moon. I would think underground bunkers would be the way to go.
What if your structure is made from lunar regolith anyway? Isn't that kind of like being underground anyway?
@@nathanahubbard1975 …
In terms of radiation protection…. Probably about the same as whatever thickness you “print” your structure at.
In terms of protection against things like meteor strikes or what not…. I think I would want to be well below the surface.
Having no atmosphere, the moon is struck by meteors at their full size.
Earth’s atmosphere burns up everything below a certain size, making life here much safer.
Thanks for the news, Fraser! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Those selfies from Orion with both Earth and the Moon in the background are instantly iconic and future classics!
But not real.
Very nice work. I enjoy your explaining whats up. In space i love launches and everything space another area were lied to about
Great, bro. The video is very cool and adds to knowledge about outer space
Some great content - Thanks man !
great content, as usual! thanks!
Thanks!
16:31 The views of Shenzhou 15 backlit by the moon is absolutely stunning
Great post Mr Cain..! It is inevitable that we will expand to our Local Solar System, and ultimately beyond....Your Channel is very much appreciated. Cheers...!
Thanks a lot, I'm glad you're enjoying them.
So in the future, tech companies will send patches via wormholes. I like that.
thank you guys
The wormhole thing is a little more complicated that that, the interpretation comes from a paper by Susskind and Malcadena where they state an incomplete analogy between gravitational physics (in this case wormholes) in a space and correspond that to nongravitational quantum mechanics on a lower dimensional boundary. In this scenario, we would live on the boundary - but the space in the middle represents a kind of gravitational universe we don't actually live in. Further, the part of the analogy that pertains to this specific case was only stated, never completed/proven. So we may have simulated a wormhole in a kind of universe that doesn't exist and it may not have even been a wormhole.
But the idea is ER=EPR and quantum computers are literally quantum systems, so it is indeed a wormhole and the only simulation is using AI to remove unnecessary terms so that the gravitational terms can be verified in real quantum systems since we cannot make large systems currently to verify every term
Also negative energy is not a real thing in classical mechanics but quantum mechanics *does* allow negative energy
@@2010RSHACKS The problem here is that ER=EPR is an analogy, there was no mathematical construction of this, so even the simulation claim is suspect.
A long time coming, I was in the Pacific for the landing in 1969, an awesome time for our country and science, I was very disappointed when we didn't continue after Apolo. It's a great time to be alive I hope I see us on Mars. "Fair Winds and Following Seas"
Amazing what can be done in a Hollywood studio isn’t it?
@ukraine7249 clearly that's all the propaganda you have. Bot
@@joehorn1762 Neal Armstrong was an actor
Open your eyes 👀
@ukraine7249 only if you don't know what those words mean. How about you stop being a dumb troll?
@@ukraine7249 amazing how modern conspiracy theories can ruin an actual achievement by mankind
If wormholes really exist, there's a high chance of a simulation being the same thing and if not, then that would suggest there are different types of wormhole.
This is so great.
I played Lunar Lander arcade video game in the 80s all the time. It's not that hard to land 😊
Dude ur doing great
Thanks
You can see this on your Meta Quest 2 end it is pretty cool. I felt like I was in outer space next to Artemis. Just a heads up for those who have it pretty cool experience.
The nearscout mission is amazing and i don't see it talked about often.
Fraserrrrrrrrrr.
I love your shows, thank you for providing them for us.
I have a question for you.
What's the fastest we can hope to travel??
Let's say acceleration wasn't a problem. Because of the interstellar dust, there must be a speed that would be catastrophic to any spacecraft. Therefore I'm sure there's a certain speed limit that would be too dangerous for us to pass?
Many thanks,
Mark
Bolton, UK
Wow, the inner arms of NGC-1566 look startlingly similar to the Milkyway-s central barbell arms. I wonder if that's what ours actually look like?
All these news are so exciting...happy to be alive today!
Hey, your thumbnail game improving, ngl 👍🏻
That's all Anton.
More moon visitors means more lunar toilets ( and low gravity bidets?)
Thinking about Orion's communication drop-out, with the talk of building a lunar base, is there also talk of deploying a moon-wide satellite communication network?
Maybe a similar set up to star link
@@ASYLUM_fz You would need probably two sats to cover the Moon 24 X 7. No where near what Star Link is dealing with, just the volume is so so different.
@@crp9985 yeah, it was just a guess
It's not really needed atm. When China landed a rover on the far side in 2019 I believe, they deployed the lander from a second stage that stayed in orbit to relay communications since it was literally the only way to communicate with the lander.
@@Jeremy9697 They did. Let's say you have two crews on the Moon one on each side. You would need a com system for the Moon. Let's say dark side is for a large telescope of some kind. Good place for that and the other side is your industrial side.
Hey, question for you: this is more about earth. I’m sorta new to alot of this stuff. I was curious, as areas of the earth dry up and get hotter from global warming and crap, do other areas become wetter, or more livable? Or will everything just keep getting hotter and drier?
Also, that space umbrella idea or whatever it is sounds really cool. Any more information on that?
Oh, I was looking at the moon two days ago, and i could see something hovering near the moon. My coworker thought it was another planet when she saw it, lol, since it was between us and the moon do you think it was a satellite?
hell yeah more Fraser UWU
Dope
Great name for a band. "Dusty knot"
Best space news channel!
Thanks! I'm really glad you're enjoying them.
does it have audio? id love to fall asleep to solar wind or what vibrations are on the ship
There is no audio in space, sound does not travel in a vacuum.
I simulated a worm hole in my garden flowerbed. The worm told me that scientists don't know what 75% of universe is made out of and that man has never been to the moon. The worm also told me to stop poisoning his flowerbed with Roundup. Kek observatory (I like it) give my regards to the frog.
Maybe if we are able to find a way to entangle to particles across vast distances to create a quantum thread?
Even with help we are doing amazing on the tech side. Not so much on the social side.
And that will be our downfall, to become an advanced civilization we all need to get along together & have no wars ect...
Would ngc 1566 be a good candidate for another block hole photo, with the angle we have there shouldn't be near as much dust shrouding the image?
It's too far, so the event horizon is too small.
2:06 - There were live streams in the 1970's, just not on demand. I think we know the internet was possible back then, but not worth the effort.
You said that the Flashlight spacecraft will be on the same trajectory as Capstone (and which the Lunar Gateway will use). You also said this trajectory brings it close to the south pole of the moon.
My understanding of the orbit that Capstone uses is that its closest approach to the moon is over the moon's north pole, and that it is much farther away from the moon when it is over the moon's south pole. (1,600 km over the north pole vs. 70,000 km over the south pole) Since the mission for Flashlight is to use a laser to probe for ice on the moon's surface in the vicinity of the place where NASA plans to place the lunar base, it would make sense for Flashlight to have an orbit that passes close to the moon over the moon's south pole, but that is not a property of the orbit Capstone is in.
Could you clarify this apparent contradiction the next time you talk about Flashlight?
@Fraser Cain Ty so much for truthfully reporting this "Wormhole" . Every puff piece I find being reported on it have irritated me to no end. The scientist themselves are saying some pretty outlandish things and at first I thought it was cleaver editing but seems to not be the case.
PS: I have read a couple papers you may be interested in where they actually have found a way using Acoustics to create Negative Energy potentials. Seems soundwaves themselves( the actual energy wave not the particles) has mass. Specific configurations have been shown to have Negative mass and repel against a Gravitational potential. The soundwaves weigh about 0.01mg per W I believe it was which is not that bad all things considered so if they actually can produce a negative mass effect many interesting things can be in our grasp. If interested I can provide a couple DOI linking to the papers.
If you scaled that up wouldn't the sounds wave be destructive?
This "scientific discovery" will end up like phosporous based life on Earth or life in the clouds of Venus. I am so worried about mainstream science in recent times.
@@crp9985 Idk. I have a couple citations on the matter one discusses the overall weight of a Soundwave and mentions testing the hypothesis using P-waves from earthquakes and the other directly states that acoustic waves directly act as negative mass curving away from Gravitational potential. While i spend a good chunk of time studying physics the later is a bit out of my wheelhouse but the former seems sound enough basically calculating the pure energy transfered in the wave and Calculates the weight briefly mentioning negative potential towards the end. If I had to guess I believe it is configurations of standing waves which act as the negative mass. This does fit with my line of study largely involving Faraday waves and other high Q resonators.
< the first i am not sure i have read, I am on my phone and not computer where my source are, the second it the one properly calculating weight of sound i believe >
_____________
Mutual interactions of phonons, rotons, and gravity
Alberto Nicolis and Riccardo Penco
Phys. Rev. B 97, 134516 - Published 18 April 2018
_____________
Gravitational Mass Carried by Sound Waves
Angelo Esposito, Rafael Krichevsky, and Alberto Nicolis
Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084501 - Published 1 March 2019
@@classicalmechanic8914 The PH3 discovery was nonsense from the start stop it already. I can think of a few dozen pathways in the heat and pressure o f venus which would lead to phosphine. Thqt discovery was nonsensical from the rip. EVERYONE wants to be the first to discover aliens. So much so we regularly get false reports .
That being said, we probably should bury negative mass if we find it can get created by the common man. It could easily end us all.
@@seditt5146 We are definitely drifting into an era of scientific sensationalism. It started with mainstream media because they recognized maximizing engagement bring them more profit. This kind of reporting is now creeping in science journalism. I hope other youtubers that are more science literate unlike Fraser Cain do not fall for it.
question: can you explain the difference between antimatter and negative matter?
As we can make antimatter - does it not provide the material source for real world testing of the wormhole thingy?
Anti matter is different from negative matter. It has all the same properties as regular matter just opposite charges. Negative matter would have negative mass.
One thing nasa was lacking was its footage as SpaceX really lead the field in this aspect,nasa still has a ways to go but in the latest artimis footage with the moon and earth it surpassed itself.
Hello there Mr Space man, can you explain a thing for me?
I thought a rocket had to have escape velocity to go to the moon, and I have often said "rockets need to have a escape velocity to get to ISS", but it looks like I was wrong, so how do we get to the moon if we go a bit slower than escape velocity?
The Moon orbits the Earth.
By going to the Moon, you are still orbiting the Earth, and haven't entirely left Earth's gravitational influence.
@@massimookissed1023 Thank you, now when you say it, that is logical and and I feel a bit embarrassed that I could not figur that out, but also the satisfaction of learning.
There you go, answered by Massimo. :-)
Headline: We created a wormhole
Reality: The Fly 🪰
Negative energy does exist. I have a coworker who is full of it. Lol 🤣😆🤣😆🤣
Light a match a blow em up!!!🤩🤣😆💫
This was a good video Fraser. I found it to be very interesting. Thanks.
Structures from regalith? That will smell bad at best. How are they going to do dust control as well? I feel there are concerns not getting the questions they may need.
NASA is keenly aware of dust and is also doing a lot of research on how to mitigate it. Making roads will actually improve things because you wont' be walking in the dust any more and tracking it in.
The big thing about the quantum wormhole hologram or simulation is proving you can yield the same result with two different fields of study that are unequivocally connected
I'll have to dig into it more to better understand that aspect.
The graphs that are commonly used to project temperature regarding global warming are also simulations not based on actual data. The greenhouse effects of CO2 were put in to boost the temperatures higher than they are in actual thermometers. This has had a real effect on real government policies.
Yes, models and simulations are helpful for predicting and planning. And then over time you can track to see how accurate your climate models have been. So far, they've been extremely accurate: climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/
Basic linear algebra allows us to form a bridge from two points in space but the question is how do we get to the other points in space. We need to have a much more fundamental understanding about how the universe works.
The wormhole story is why finger quotes exist. Science has been forced to become a quasi art form at times with the fragmentation of information so its not really that egregious or surprising.
"I could do a whole show talking about all these interesting missions [...] to go back to start exploring the moon." Pretty please? 🥺
Hah. 😀
16:42 "Only for about a month" the time will be even shorter, about 5 days with six Chinese astronauts before Shenzhou 14 comes back home, there's videos of the recovery team prepping the landing site in Mongolia
People need to waaaake up
If zero point energy is a floor on the lowest state that is higher than we think, then maybe negative energy would be a relative term, rather than an absolute?
Live stream from behind the Moon, one light second away! Still less delay that the 5-12 seconds on my cable tv.
You were watching the livestream on your TV?
@@frasercain No, but did later. Just trying to make a smartass answer on the quality of the video from that distance..
Resistance is Fertile (when it comes to 'pushing' electrons through copper).
Bruh, you said Scott Manley when you showed Issac Arthur
Wormhole in the Quantum computer was as real as the Qubit that was teleported through it...
9:35 So what they did, is a computer model of a wormhole. Similar to a design of flying machines 100s of years before they actually existed.
On one hand, this is very exciting. Everything we have done so far started with an idea and then the model and then a usable product. This is extremely exciting.
On the other hand it could be, like Leonardo da Vinci's flying machine, more than 400 years away from reality.
Guys....we cured cancer!
.........in a computer simulation!
ok fine. we're just playing a video game.
I have signed up for your newsletter twice now; however after having checked spam and trash folders when the notice you sent as a verification never arrived.
Maybe add info@universetoday.com to your approved senders?
A well constructed simulation, within an adequate computer model (meaning all parameters are accurately modeled)…. Is basically proof (or at least partial proof) that the maths don’t “break down”.
In other words…. It can show that, “Yes, our math is correct. And IF this thing (which as far as we can tell, DOESN’T ACTUALLY EXIST), did in fact exist in the real world, then yes, it would be ‘possible’ to produce what we have hypothesized.”
Wouldn't it be awesome if they built rockets that could land, pop open and 3d print shelters around themselves? Maybe have some rovers that could move to the perfect place and do that also.. We could have a base in no time!
The more automation and infrastructure we can build in space, the better we'll be able to explore.
More like they proved spooky action after a distance
Simulated it anyway.
@@frasercain yep
Given the lower gravity on the moon could we not put a Space elevator there?
A space elevator is a good solution on the Moon. You can build it with commercial materials like kevlar tether.
I simulated a wormhole using an actual hole that a worm made.
Should work about the same.
Isn't a very small amount of negative energy created when two metal flat plates are moved extremely one together?
Thank you for the quantum wormhole simulation explanation.
Is it possible that microbial life (if it exists) in the Venusian atmosphere could’ve been seeded there by our own exploration spacecraft?
We can travel thru different types of matter differently. Some matter we have to go around.
Could it be that wherever we find dark matter there is a path from 1 side of it to the other that can be navigated while bypassing the speed of light. Indeed light speed has nothing to do with doing it that way .
Lunar water ice- Just another finite resource humans will exploit until it's gone.
It's ok. It's not real.
Negative energy definitely exists. Just read the comment section long enough.
You just won the internet. 😀
The darkside is strong 💪in the comments
If Starship launches in March, it better be on my birthday. The 22nd...
starship is a fraud, like Elon. It will never host humans
@@nocternbemsi5619 lies
@@wxb200 lets see then..remember according to Elon we would be on Mars with humans in 2022 (yes this year) according to earlier statements. He. is. a. fraud. please come back to my first reply in 5 years time or 10.
We will always be ahead in the space race as long as we maintain a clean conscience on our step outward, with no hypocrisy or reason to be doubted shall we lead well enough onward
If your on the southern hemisphere how do you fine the south star. Like they have for the north star.
There is no southern equivalent to Polaris but even Polaris is 0.6 degrees away from the northern rotation axis, you can align using the known stars, you just use more than one
Huh, all the space CZcamsrs I know well. I’ve seen one of them before once, but I’ve followed you for 17 years so…. Just you mate!
Thanks for the superthanks!
Oh I dank day like det 💪😎🇺🇸
What about anti matter from the Big Hadrian collider
And please don't bash me I'm not scientist
Antimatter isn't negative matter. Antimatter has the same mass and properties as regular matter, it just has opposite charge. Negative matter would actually have negative mass, which would be pretty unusual.
The Quanta Magazine documentary is a total miss. They spent 20 minutes not explaining anything much.
For Q/A
I'm aware that you think life doesn't exist beyond earth and I agree, but do you think more will in the future somewhere else?
It's not possible for any life to exist beyond Earth. Nothing exists beyond Earth.
The objective of the simulated wormhole is progress towards a theory of quantum gravity, and the result is hugely exciting and fairly promising in that context.
I agree, it's just too bad that journalists went with the "physicists made a wormhole" approach.
@@frasercain Too true!
Sadly it has nothing to do with gravity, so it isn't
@@nicholasandrzejkiewicz Definitely does, sorry.
@@stephendatgmail In the ER=EPR paper they literally say it's a conjecture. It doesn't. What they did was ordinary quantum mechanics.
The quantom computer simulation of the wormhole only feels like a step forward, like on the number line coming from the negative side and getting closer to zero, but without any chance of passing the zero like an asymtote closing in on zero. And "real" wormholes are still not viable beacuse of the lack of negative energy.
As long as they rely on something that seems to be impossible to actually create, they'll remain in science fiction.
@@frasercain …
But the descriptions they can give within a science fiction story, will continually sound better and better 😂
Einstein simulated entangled particles in his mind using math, then later on we found out entangled particles are what we call real or a reality within this experience construct we reside in. So who is to say this quantum wormhole simulation isn't a reality.
🛸 👽
Hey Frasier. Is it possible that a black hole is capable of using it's gravitational lense as a death ray that can point the light into one tiny spot on earth that can vaporize anything there? We have gamma ray bursts that can do the same but what about black holes at the right distance that can make that happen?
Yes.
Source: pondered it for 5 mins and can't see why not.
Having given it another 5 mins I now don't think it's possible.
In short.. I think it'd need to be too big to avoid collapse while staying in earth's atmosphere.
And too small to create a beam large enough to avoid the refraction If placed outside the atmosphere.
I'll get back to you in 5 mins.
Death-ray another grb? Naw. It's the same energy reconvened.
Don't you know.... We have mistakenly opened black hole at moon... It is shrinking... Earth will be eaten shortly🤣😌
I've got terawatts and megajoules of negative energy I'll gladly unload for an unreasonable price.
Isn't the importance of the "wormhole" is that it's a test of ER=EPR ?
Here's their press release from Caltech, which is fairly calm discussion of it, and they talk about the ER=EPR: www.caltech.edu/about/news/physicists-observe-wormhole-dynamics-using-a-quantum-computer
How deep can lasers trace?
Seriously doubt they’d show live feed with all they are hiding.
Wait, I've got it! We can use Twitter to create negative energy!
I don't think starship will launch in march, more like august / september probably
You could very well be right, but he keeps giving the impression that a launch is a month away, which usually means it's about to happen... in 4 months.
Whenever it does launch it will follow the same trajectory as all rockets. Up and then a parabolic curve back down, into the ocean. Nobody and nothing has ever physically left Earth and never will 😉
The americans built their first
moon base in the early 1950's.
Now they would have dozens.
There are no bases on the Moon. We haven't set foot on the Moon since 1972.
8:51 yes yes they simulaye basedon..whatsome one has say.. what if there is no black holes? not wor as they think. can you life without
"It will be built on the Moon using Local Material" 🤔
Regolith from the Moon
2:45 Stars are visible cos the exposure is increased. There you go flatties!
Haha! If you say so.
Will anything come after the ISS?