आप का बद्ध जापान चीन श्री लंका जेसे देश के लोगो से अलग है। क्या जानते है तान्त्रिक buddhism है। Buddhism मे देवी देवता भी है। दलित हिन्दू एवं सरकार विरोधी तरह का buddhism है ये। बुद्ध ने पुनर्जन्म को माना। राजकुमार सिद्धार्थ बुद्ध बने। एक upper caste की पूजा करते है आप। और ये आपकी buddhism नमो बुद्धाय से परिचित है।
That is just a hypothesis bro If you think logically , then you will realise that universe will always continue to exists and ata some any quantum fluctuations will occur resulting in another big bang
Sir i love how you use the words so efficiently i also thinks there is even bigger picture that humans will never be able to perceive that because we are not made this way your gem sir 💎 pls keep up these deep conversation
After death, the physical layer merges with the earth. The mental layer does not die. Our mind must become subtle to experience this. In India, the rishis and munis who were serious about understanding death realized that our thinking itself is a limitation. Therefore, they spent time doing tapas, which means keeping the mind still without thoughts. They avoided having families and stayed away from the affairs of the materialistic world, dedicating their lives to tapas. Through this practice, they were able to experience higher levels of consciousness and understand subtle truths about life, life after death, rebirth, and liberation. If we ask for evidence of their higher consciousness, then the person verifying it must also reach that higher level of consciousness, which is rare in society. Generally, people who have achieved higher consciousness remain silent and do not share these truths with others to avoid being mocked as pseudo-scientists or fake gurus. The value of subtle truth gets lost otherwise. They share subtle truths only with true seekers, knowing that people with gross minds cannot comprehend them.
Dont know these books but I have heard Osho a lot. Definitely listen to him. But don't fall for any subjective experience that he talks about. There is no way you can compare your experience with his. If you are making progress as compared to your own self, that should be enough. I hope it helps.
Sir This body has several billion living cells. They are communicating to each other and that is what is happening. Dr Brian Cox of Cambridge University professor Please check
If the bubble theory is correct, then even the energy that comprises the present universe is bound to be extinguished when the bubble pops. Another bubble blows up to take its place and embark on its own life cycle. Not even an entire universe is singular or special.
Please review the dune universe! Dune part 1 was amazing and dune part 2 right now is a masterpiece movie. Frank's novel is saying soo much! Please decode this! Trust me you'll love it. Sr
I don't know from what point of time or why people's after death & being through the cycle of rebirth coming into as Atheist & leaving behind it . Moreover it's almost throughout the world all souls has started a revolt against it & exponentially increases a neo commune
Sir please help me, I am 17 years old and muje God vagera pr believe nhi hai,mene suna hai ki buddha bhi en sab hell, heaven, rebirth pr nhi mante par unke tripitak mai to esa likha hai ki vh mante the to kya sahi hai? Bahut pareshan hu plz guiduns 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Buddha did not write trpitak it was written after mahaparinirwaan of buddha by his follower and they made it like a palatable story for the people of that time only teaching by buddha that's true is associated with no like eight fold path and four noble truths are real.
95% of me comes to the same conclusion as you when deducing this logically....however it lasts untill I am reminded of uva department of perceptual studies solved cases of reincarnation...and then i am back to square one. What's your opinion on this?
Objective- Earth is a sphere [necessarily true.. always] Subjective- shah rukh khan is a good actor [some may find him bad, it's a matter of opinion] Hope I gave the general idea😊
Subjective is what you perceive from your perspective(You/we/me) Objective is understanding the object just for itself...like finding out what water is made of hydrogen and oxygen which also we found studying objects i.e humare soch ko side me rakhkar hum is cheez ko usi keliye samajhne keliye study kare
I've been an avid follower of your work for several months now, and I've thoroughly enjoyed the content you've shared. However, this video has left me feeling quite unsettled. The idea that my consciousness will cease to exist after death that there will be no trace of 'me' is a frightening thought. As an agnostic, this isn't a new concept for me, it's a stance I've found myself aligned with for as long as I can remember. The realization that there will be nothing left of me post-mortem fills me with sorrow. I'm struggling to find a way to cope with this notion.
Why sorrow? It seems you have aligned your own self with eternal reality or you have taken yourself to be too important or your way of living could be too self centred. Sorrow only arises when self is too rigid.
@@adarshverma2014 Let's not misinterpret my words as narcissistic it's merely a broad observation. I'm not fond of stereotyping, yet in this instance, it seems to be a matter of common sense. I refrain from speaking on behalf of others, but I'm confident this is a widely held view. Therefore, let's avoid hastily labeling someone as self-absorbed. My inquiry is about coping strategies, not an admission of ignorance or unawareness of life's impermanence. Smjha?
No need to fear such a feeling, the fact that you can feel is a fact you're alive, once you will be dead. You cannot feel, you cannot perceive. You will not be able to tell the difference between a nano second or a millennium.
"Main prakriti ka hissa ban jaunga, main pedon me sama jaunga, main janwaron me sama jaunga, main pani ban jaunga, . . ." etc etc. But, Vimoh, how logical is it to make such claims when the very first thing that disappears forever when you are dead is 'main' (मैं)? There is no 'main' after you are dead! 'Main' doesn't become anything else, it's simply gone.
Bhaiya plz Debunk the ontological proof of God by Gödel. I have been suffering from existential crisis after knowing that God can be proved using Maths and logic
आपकी ऐसी वीडियो मुझे बहुत पसंद हैं... कोई बच्चा भी जटिल बात को आसानी से समझ सकता है ...बुद्ध को जो ज्ञान हुआ था पुनर्जन्म,आत्मा,मरने के बाद क्या,जीवन में दुख का कारण,दुख से निवारण पर ऐसा ही ज्ञान तो दिया था लेकिन लोग enlightnment के शब्द को पारलौकिक सिध्दियां मिलना समझते हैं लेकिन बुद्ध ने ऐसा कोई दावा कभी नही किया !
त्रिपिटक पढ़िए ... गौतम बुद्ध स्वर्ग नरक , पुनर्जन्म , देवता , राक्षस सबमें यकीन करते थे । तिब्बत के बौद्ध तो सारे तांत्रिक कर्म और पुजा पाठ करते हैं ।..
@@ui-we2077Tripitak Alag Alag Baudh bhikhhuon dwara likhe gaye Hain aur Jahan tak tibbat Buddhism ka sawal hai woh buddh ka Naam Leke apna Lamaism hi dho Rahe hain... Buddhism Jahan gaya Japan,china,Myanmar,south Korea,Sri Lanka sabne apni hi cheezain Mila di lekin buddh ko bhi mante Hain...isliye to Alag Alag sect Hain Buddhism mein khud asoka ke samay Buddhism 17 sects mein devide ho gaya tha jisko asoka ne clear Kiya aur buddh ke mool dhamma ka prachaar Kiya lekin samay ke Saath bahut si bekaar ki baatain har dharm mein jud jati Hain ,isliye to Buddhism mein sangiti Karne ki parmapra rahi hai taki clutter ko nikaala jaye.Buddh ke samay me hi buddh bol gaye thy ki Kisi bhi baat ko tabhi Mano jab wo tumhari buddhi aur Vivek ki kasauti pe Khari utre kyunki kyunki unko pata tha ki unke Jane ke baad unki baaton ka Matlab koi bhi Apni Tarah nikaal lega...ye baat budh ne kalam sutta mein kahi hai.😮
Sounds like modern philosophy extented and clearer version of well accepted general philosophy where it's been prioritise social welfare over personal welfare.
@vimoh I thought you are logical but I am wrong. How can you be a tree after your death. I know some people’s will remember after your death. But how can you be a tree ?
My ashes or my body which turns to dust goes into the soil. Seeds fall into that soil. Treegrows from that soil. Part of the tree is made of the dust that I am.
@@vimoh what if you gone for jungle safari and unfortunately you became a food for tiger. Or also possibility is that you drawn in water and you became a food for the fishes. N number of possibilities are there in which you will not became a dust or ashes.
@@eshakshaik3380 if you are buried, body will decompose and it will become part of earth, and if there is tree nearby, your decomposed part may go to tree. If your body is burned, your ashes will go to earth and it may follow different path, whoever death occur body will become part of nature and nature can use part of us in whatever ways it desire. By ashes he mean that in India hindu burn body after death.
I think at last we can only stand on an agnostic position.... As you said we are in a prison of our senses, then what is the truth beyond the senses.... Any claim or disclaim about that is actually a farce... However being agnostic doesn't mean we should content our curiousity .
It's really weird how advait philosophy or Geeta 's verses are misinterpreted and promoted. When the scripture talks about eternal consciousness , It means (upto my philosophical penetration and understanding) that :- 1. Consciousness will exist eternally wherever there is life.(Biologically) 2. In humans there is always a consciousness which exist whether you are a coward a wretched person or anything DISMAL. 3. If we were to categorize humans on different parts based on existence then we get following categorisation . :- a. Ann b.pran c. Man d. Vigyan e. Anand ( bliss in self ) . Now atam is like a goal,( my understanding ) , a fine point between duality where it's completely stable ( as defined by scriptures) where we humans needs to focus on . So in a nutshell the eternal consciousness is related to the positive nature of scriptures which are required for salvation . And the concept of eternal life or life after death is related to the metamorphosis that we all need to face and a goal is required to transform so you get a subtle consciousness that is very hard to achieve and can discriminate or judge in a way that leads to best life.
well its because , Prabhupad hated advaita vedanta calling followers of it rascals and mayavaadis ,so he did hodge podge in his translation of his gita which he says"is as it is " to make people go into his cult , u can even see this today , there is a video where a follower of this cult calls Adi Shankaras philosophy a bogus philosophy
Our genes will live more our work will live more, more than my body... But even these things have limited time... Because even humanity has a limited time until we will become extra terrestrial living creatures...
I don't believe the god but imao religion resembles the cultural heritage of that perticular country like you can’t destroy any historic structute irrespective of it is usefull or not like we should not destroy the religion but should eliminate bad things from this culture.people should know this is their culture that does not means god exists......i always believes that god is like complex number like complex number does not exist god does not exist but by assuming god any one can solve their so many modern day problems like fear anxiety depression
Ek kisan(ya koi bhi shramveer) jo pure din mehnat karta hai bas iss hope me ki Bhagwan usse mehnat ka fal dega. Wo khushmizaz bhi rehta hai sabke sath(Including atheists) uske liye Atheist banna sahi hoga? Iskcon waalo ki kuch baate Over the Top hongi par wo gareebo ko khana khilate hai bina dharm puche(same with gurudwaras) Jin Rishi Munio ne ye customs banae honge kya wo ye nahi jante honge ki log ya to Atheist honge ya Theist? Kya Humans k faide k liye hi religion ka gathan nahi hua hoga. Ye maana ja sakta hai ki Logo se Rishi Munio ko follow nahi kiya par kya wo bilkul galat the?
I have been to some of the highest points on the earth - not found gods I have been to multiple pilgrimages - not found god I have been to various religious buildings - never found god I have visited the homes of a lot of religious people - didn’t see any traces of god But I saw people come to the aid of a guy stuck underneath a burning vehicle and I saw humanity. The places where I went where they say that “god” is to be found, I found neither god nor humanity. Btw - this ain’t a made up post for dramatic effect . These are all my real life experiences.
Acchi hai aapki apni theory bass time pass k liye but pani ko kuch aur bol dene se pani k properties khatam nhi ho jyga pani hi rahegi 😂 ye sab time pass k liye theek h but koi conclusion nhi mila
your body is matter but conciousness is just a statebit exists in now and everybody will die just like you can never destroy water it'll either be ice or vapour but not water once you heat it or freeze
I don't know but this time ur view resembles very much with Advaita philosophy, because whatever u said in the end it resembles with death of ego or I or whatever thing it is.
Yes but advaita and many other philosophical thoughts separate the ego and the soul. The "soul", in my opinion, is just a fictional extension of the "I"
@@animeshadhikary7802 no offense to ur openion but as far as I know about it i don't think so there is a separation of such kind. All I wanted to say is that how vimoh gave a perception to see death and life, from core it is resembling with Advaita philosophy.
@@animeshadhikary7802the 'soul' concept is western in advaita there is aatma identical to brhman yes they are just the words but they are the outcome of deep insights
I want to clear it I am not a firm believer of Advaita or any kind of philosophy, I always want to be skeptical, this statement was purely out of my curiosity because this perticular view was resembling with that certain philosophy.
@@vimoh Enlightenment, if such a word is necessary, is the breaking down of the illusory nature of our thoughts, fears , attachments and expectations.. It's seeing the world with fresh eyes, unclouded by our conditioning and past experiences. It is a state of self-luminous awareness, where one transcends the limitations of the body-mind complex and the notion of doership. It's complete freedom from the known. To be free of all authority, of your own and that of another, is to die to everything of yesterday, so that your mind is always fresh, always young, innocent, full of vigour and passion. It is only in that elevated state towards ultimate enlightenment that one learns and observes. Now coming to the point that whether I am enlightened or not is I am certainly not-enlightened. If I were enlightened, I wouldn't have watched or commented on your video . There would have been no need to watch you or any other's point of view on existence for me in the state pure existence where all the confusion vanished like mist before the morning sun, leaving a clear and peaceful sky of existence-consciousness-bliss. all the doubt dissolved like sugar crystals melting in a warm cup of tea☕. I know now you would ask what is the evidence and How do you know this ? The answer will be my own profound mystical experience In the course of doing rigorous sadhana. I am a 19 years old boy, After exploring different traditions of Hinduism, then Buddha to osho to Krishnamurthy, I made my own Sadhana style which includes unique meditation techniques based upon observations of waves of thoughts arising from the ocean of mind given by Buddha, patanjali yog sutra ( especially Raj yoga by Swami Vivekananda) , vigyan bhairav tantra and kundalini yoga. I used to wake up at 4 am after a bathing , doing my practices. And During those days I got a profound spiritual Mystical experience which simply can't be explained to others who don't have any idea what I am talking about. Now it's up to you how you take my opinion.. 😉
Enlightenment, if such a word is necessary, is the breaking down of the illusory nature of our thoughts, fears , attachments and expectations.. It's seeing the world with fresh eyes, unclouded by our conditioning and past experiences. It is a state of self-luminous awareness, where one transcends the limitations of the body-mind complex and the notion of doership. It's complete freedom from the known. To be free of all authority, of your own and that of another, is to die to everything of yesterday, so that your mind is always fresh, always young, innocent, full of vigour and passion. It is only in that elevated state towards ultimate enlightenment that one learns and observes. Now coming to the point that whether I am enlightened or not is I am certainly not-enlightened. If I were enlightened, I wouldn't have watched or commented on your video . There would have been no need to watch you or any other's point of view on existence for me being in the state of pure existence where all the confusion vanished like mist before the morning sun, leaving a clear and peaceful sky of existence-consciousness-bliss. Where all the doubt dissolved like sugar crystals melting in a warm cup of tea☕. I know now you would ask what is the evidence and How do you know this ? The answer will be my own mystical experience In the course of doing rigorous sadhana. I am a 19 years old boy, after exploring different traditions of Hinduism then Buddha to osho , I create my unique Sadhana technique which includes meditation techniques based on the observation of waves of thoughts in the ocean of mind, patanjali yog sutra, Vigyan bhairav tantra and kundalini yoga. I used to wake up early at 4 am in the morning and after bath , doing my sadhana practices . During my practices I got a profound spiritual Mystical experience which simply can't be explained especially to the one who doesn't have any idea what I am talking about. So at the end of the day It's up to you how you wanna take my opinion 😉
I am not in the favour that god does not exist .... As a highly spiritual person... I believe and I have experienced that Positivity is GOD Negativity is DEMON nothing else
Humans get every single knowledge in existence. All discoveries, all inventions, all that can be known. Within that we did not see any evidence of God and thus we say that GOD definitely does not exist. Now in 2024 do we have complete knowledge? So wouldn't that make Atheism a little irrational? Shouldn't atheism encourage Agnosticism if Rationality has to be considered!!?? Please consider this as a independent question to Atheism. Hope it is not answered in terms of what about blind faith, violence, etc in religion??
Should we be agnostic towards claims of dragons, flying hippos, cosmic teddy bears, and interdimensional pixies too or is this just about that one specific claim about god?
@@vimoh so the source of all is nonsense. Still atheism looks a little irrational based on the original question!? There may be a chance you did not understand the original question. You just replaced blind faith with unicorns and other things. So the question does not get answered. Shifting it with another question is ok upto a certain level . Say unicorns have zero existence chances, so the existence of God has zero chances. This correlation looks a little unreasonable. The intention of the first comment of mine was different.
You raise a fair point that human knowledge while vast is not absolute or complete. We have indeed made incredible discoveries and inventions but there are still frontiers of knowledge that remain unexplored or not fully understood. To claim that we have attained "every single knowledge in existence" would be an oversimplification of the limits of human understanding. Hence, the lack of complete knowledge does not automatically make atheism irrational or necessitate an agnostic position. Atheism, at its core, is the lack of belief in any deities or supernatural entities due to an absence of convincing evidence for their existence.
Jaise tumne subconsciousness or Consciousness jaise words ka use karte ho without knowing ki wo hay kea... Pehele object keya hay bha ye praman do.. Bebuniyad baat bolne se kuchu nahi hota... Maximum atheist ka problem ye hay ki sab kuch logically explain karne ki chakkar me ye bhul jate hay ki Nature paradoxical hay... Paradox ko logic se jana nahi ja sakta... This video explain nothing about the subject life after death. Sorry.
Marne ke baad kya hota hai woh duniya ka koi bhi scientist yeh proof nahi kar sakta jaise ki meri nani ko dead huwe 3 months hogaye aab meri nani kya feel kar rahi hogi kaisa mehsoos kar rahi hogi yeh koi bhi nahi bata sakta science yeh bhi kehti hai energy marti nahi hai energy can't destroyed toh insaan marne ke baad permanent khatam hojayega hojayega yah non living thing ki tarah zinda rahega kisi ko bhi nahi malum hai
Chalo bhai thik hai maan liya nature paradoxical hai usko logic se nhi jaana ja skta..... Lekin tumhe kaise pata tumhara dharm hi usko sahi tarike se explain karta hai....do you have any proof any evidence
@@strange7240 ye Dharm ka bisay nahi Darshan ka bishay hai. Aur raha proof ki baat to yea itna muskil subject hay ki isko ek comments section me discussion nahi kia ja sakta.. Aur sabse bari baat agar meine proof de bhi dia to bhi tum kuch na kuch argument doge, kiyuki tumhe man na hi nahi hay.. Is liye Atheism ko promote karo baria se aur khus raho... 🙏🙏
आपके विचारो से सहमत नही। पुरे विश्व के धर्मो एवं विश्वास है आत्मा और परमात्मा मे। क्या श्रीमद्भगवत गीता फिर गलत है? क्या आपने सब ज्ञान लेलिया कुच भी सेश नही। क्या आप सारे dimensions के बारे मे सब कुछ जान चुके है ? क्या जगद्गुरु शंकराचार्या विद्वान नही थे? श्री रामकृष्ण परमहंस भी गलत। श्री चैतन्य महाप्रभु? आपने सब जान लिया इस अहंकार मे मत रहो। एसे बोलते है जेसे आपकी बात शेष बात है। जेसे आपने सब proof किया। अभी विज्ञान भी कुछ नही कह सकता। कल को कुछ भी आश्चर्य हो सकता है। Finally आप के विचार उन्हे जिन्होने अपने प्रिय जनो को खोया है उन्हे शान्ती नही देती। अपितु कष्ट देती है। अगर हम विश्वास करे की मृत व्यक्तियों की आत्मा अमर है तो गलत क्या? किसकी क्या बिगरेगी? अपितु अपने प्रियाजनो की सलामती से शांति मिलती है विश्वास ही सही है।
बुद्ध ने इसी प्रकार के पुनर्जन्म को माना था (According to नवयान)❤
😢😢
😅😅😅
आप का बद्ध जापान चीन श्री लंका जेसे देश के लोगो से अलग है। क्या जानते है तान्त्रिक buddhism है। Buddhism मे देवी देवता भी है। दलित हिन्दू एवं सरकार विरोधी तरह का buddhism है ये। बुद्ध ने पुनर्जन्म को माना।
राजकुमार सिद्धार्थ बुद्ध बने। एक upper caste की पूजा करते है आप। और ये आपकी buddhism नमो बुद्धाय से परिचित है।
Kon budhha😂
@@festivalswithartsbuddhism me devi devta kalpanik maane jaate h,
Cosmology makes you humble.
I love the way you explain a concept, so clear and to the point with clarity of thoughts and examples. I strive to be like that in future. Thank you
7:05 that movement will come not only for earth but for universe also
That is just a hypothesis bro
If you think logically , then you will realise that universe will always continue to exists and ata some any quantum fluctuations will occur resulting in another big bang
Sir i love how you use the words so efficiently i also thinks there is even bigger picture that humans will never be able to perceive that because we are not made this way your gem sir 💎 pls keep up these deep conversation
Very nice pragmatic outlook.Thanks
Really appreciate for a great perspective ❤❤❤
Sir thoughts on channel 'Desi Philosopher'??
The host Faraz , even had you on a podcast
Beautifully explained!
PLZZ vimoh, make a video on smile2jannah's video about Spanish incident in india
So clear! Thank you
Thanks for information
Thanks for helping him❤️
After death, the physical layer merges with the earth. The mental layer does not die. Our mind must become subtle to experience this.
In India, the rishis and munis who were serious about understanding death realized that our thinking itself is a limitation. Therefore, they spent time doing tapas, which means keeping the mind still without thoughts. They avoided having families and stayed away from the affairs of the materialistic world, dedicating their lives to tapas.
Through this practice, they were able to experience higher levels of consciousness and understand subtle truths about life, life after death, rebirth, and liberation.
If we ask for evidence of their higher consciousness, then the person verifying it must also reach that higher level of consciousness, which is rare in society. Generally, people who have achieved higher consciousness remain silent and do not share these truths with others to avoid being mocked as pseudo-scientists or fake gurus. The value of subtle truth gets lost otherwise.
They share subtle truths only with true seekers, knowing that people with gross minds cannot comprehend them.
very good sir.
sir, aap mic konsa use karte hai podcast ke liye?
Sir what are your thoughts about osho and his books - "The book of secrets" and " The Ultimate Alchemy"?
Dont know these books but I have heard Osho a lot. Definitely listen to him. But don't fall for any subjective experience that he talks about. There is no way you can compare your experience with his. If you are making progress as compared to your own self, that should be enough. I hope it helps.
@@VipulExplainswhat should i believe?
anyone know what happen after death
It was great video , it reminded me of daoist master who told similar version of afterlife ✨😊
Konsa video bnaya apne phle uska link daliye
Sorry. Daal diya
This is lit ❤
Sir
This body has several billion living cells.
They are communicating to each other
and that is what is happening.
Dr Brian Cox of Cambridge University professor
Please check
Sir i am a big fan of yours 💟
this is the real knowledge.
Nooo he removed the posters, i liked those.
If the bubble theory is correct, then even the energy that comprises the present universe is bound to be extinguished when the bubble pops. Another bubble blows up to take its place and embark on its own life cycle. Not even an entire universe is singular or special.
What is a life form if it is made of same common elements of non living?
Please review the dune universe! Dune part 1 was amazing and dune part 2 right now is a masterpiece movie. Frank's novel is saying soo much! Please decode this! Trust me you'll love it. Sr
You are correct✅
I don't know from what point of time or why people's after death & being through the cycle of rebirth coming into as Atheist & leaving behind it . Moreover it's almost throughout the world all souls has started a revolt against it & exponentially increases a neo commune
Vimoh humbled us today 🫂
Sir please help me, I am 17 years old and muje God vagera pr believe nhi hai,mene suna hai ki buddha bhi en sab hell, heaven, rebirth pr nhi mante par unke tripitak mai to esa likha hai ki vh mante the to kya sahi hai? Bahut pareshan hu plz guiduns 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Buddha did not write trpitak it was written after mahaparinirwaan of buddha by his follower and they made it like a palatable story for the people of that time only teaching by buddha that's true is associated with no like eight fold path and four noble truths are real.
In therbad buddhism there is no rebirth
Haan bhai, buddha ne rebirth aur karma ke baare mein bola toh tha, nahi bola tha aisa bolna ignorance hoga. He said about these things
If we are creater so every human create its own reality ..
95% of me comes to the same conclusion as you when deducing this logically....however it lasts untill I am reminded of uva department of perceptual studies solved cases of reincarnation...and then i am back to square one. What's your opinion on this?
What about Ghosts?? Do they really exist??? 🤔🤔🤔
Sir subjectivity aur objectivity kya hota hai aur inme antar kya hai?
Mool roop se, subjectivity vyaktigat vyakhya aur bhavnao par adharit hota hai, jabki objectivity tathyatmak saboot aur nishpaksh drishti par dhyan kendrit hota hai.
Objective- Earth is a sphere [necessarily true.. always]
Subjective- shah rukh khan is a good actor [some may find him bad, it's a matter of opinion]
Hope I gave the general idea😊
Objectivity is the projection of subjectivity
Subjective is what you perceive from your perspective(You/we/me)
Objective is understanding the object just for itself...like finding out what water is made of hydrogen and oxygen which also we found studying objects i.e humare soch ko side me rakhkar hum is cheez ko usi keliye samajhne keliye study kare
Sir please voice thoda increase kare
I like your videos
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 7:21
I've been an avid follower of your work for several months now, and I've thoroughly enjoyed the content you've shared. However, this video has left me feeling quite unsettled. The idea that my consciousness will cease to exist after death that there will be no trace of 'me' is a frightening thought. As an agnostic, this isn't a new concept for me, it's a stance I've found myself aligned with for as long as I can remember. The realization that there will be nothing left of me post-mortem fills me with sorrow. I'm struggling to find a way to cope with this notion.
As they say..
"Facts don't care about your feelings"
Why sorrow? It seems you have aligned your own self with eternal reality or you have taken yourself to be too important or your way of living could be too self centred. Sorrow only arises when self is too rigid.
@@adarshverma2014 A lot of people wish to live forever, me included.
@@adarshverma2014 Let's not misinterpret my words as narcissistic it's merely a broad observation. I'm not fond of stereotyping, yet in this instance, it seems to be a matter of common sense. I refrain from speaking on behalf of others, but I'm confident this is a widely held view. Therefore, let's avoid hastily labeling someone as self-absorbed. My inquiry is about coping strategies, not an admission of ignorance or unawareness of life's impermanence. Smjha?
No need to fear such a feeling, the fact that you can feel is a fact you're alive, once you will be dead. You cannot feel, you cannot perceive. You will not be able to tell the difference between a nano second or a millennium.
"Main prakriti ka hissa ban jaunga, main pedon me sama jaunga, main janwaron me sama jaunga, main pani ban jaunga, . . ." etc etc.
But, Vimoh, how logical is it to make such claims when the very first thing that disappears forever when you are dead is 'main' (मैं)? There is no 'main' after you are dead! 'Main' doesn't become anything else, it's simply gone.
Rula diya.
Bhaiya plz Debunk the ontological proof of God by Gödel. I have been suffering from existential crisis after knowing that God can be proved using Maths and logic
आपकी ऐसी वीडियो मुझे बहुत पसंद हैं... कोई बच्चा भी जटिल बात को आसानी से समझ सकता है ...बुद्ध को जो ज्ञान हुआ था पुनर्जन्म,आत्मा,मरने के बाद क्या,जीवन में दुख का कारण,दुख से निवारण पर ऐसा ही ज्ञान तो दिया था लेकिन लोग enlightnment के शब्द को पारलौकिक सिध्दियां मिलना समझते हैं लेकिन बुद्ध ने ऐसा कोई दावा कभी नही किया !
त्रिपिटक पढ़िए ... गौतम बुद्ध स्वर्ग नरक , पुनर्जन्म , देवता , राक्षस सबमें यकीन करते थे । तिब्बत के बौद्ध तो सारे तांत्रिक कर्म और पुजा पाठ करते हैं ।..
@@ui-we2077Tripitak Alag Alag Baudh bhikhhuon dwara likhe gaye Hain aur Jahan tak tibbat Buddhism ka sawal hai woh buddh ka Naam Leke apna Lamaism hi dho Rahe hain... Buddhism Jahan gaya Japan,china,Myanmar,south Korea,Sri Lanka sabne apni hi cheezain Mila di lekin buddh ko bhi mante Hain...isliye to Alag Alag sect Hain Buddhism mein khud asoka ke samay Buddhism 17 sects mein devide ho gaya tha jisko asoka ne clear Kiya aur buddh ke mool dhamma ka prachaar Kiya lekin samay ke Saath bahut si bekaar ki baatain har dharm mein jud jati Hain ,isliye to Buddhism mein sangiti Karne ki parmapra rahi hai taki clutter ko nikaala jaye.Buddh ke samay me hi buddh bol gaye thy ki Kisi bhi baat ko tabhi Mano jab wo tumhari buddhi aur Vivek ki kasauti pe Khari utre kyunki kyunki unko pata tha ki unke Jane ke baad unki baaton ka Matlab koi bhi Apni Tarah nikaal lega...ye baat budh ne kalam sutta mein kahi hai.😮
@@medialords8647आपका buddhism जातिवादी है और दलित वादी है। अपने पास ही रक्खे या अलग देश जाय। दुसरे धर्म के खिलाफ नफरत फैलाने वालो।
परम ज्ञानी reservation वाले।
Share kijiye kyuki aap Jinda hai❤
Sounds like modern philosophy extented and clearer version of well accepted general philosophy where it's been prioritise social welfare over personal welfare.
It lasted very soon😢
@vimoh I thought you are logical but I am wrong. How can you be a tree after your death. I know some people’s will remember after your death. But how can you be a tree ?
My ashes or my body which turns to dust goes into the soil. Seeds fall into that soil. Treegrows from that soil. Part of the tree is made of the dust that I am.
@@vimoh what if you gone for jungle safari and unfortunately you became a food for tiger. Or also possibility is that you drawn in water and you became a food for the fishes. N number of possibilities are there in which you will not became a dust or ashes.
@@eshakshaik3380 if you are buried, body will decompose and it will become part of earth, and if there is tree nearby, your decomposed part may go to tree. If your body is burned, your ashes will go to earth and it may follow different path, whoever death occur body will become part of nature and nature can use part of us in whatever ways it desire.
By ashes he mean that in India hindu burn body after death.
@@eshakshaik3380 if a tiger eats you then you are part of that tiger doesn't mean you're concious tho
I think at last we can only stand on an agnostic position.... As you said we are in a prison of our senses, then what is the truth beyond the senses.... Any claim or disclaim about that is actually a farce... However being agnostic doesn't mean we should content our curiousity .
Hi,I want to join but don't want to show my channel name
show channel name where?
You explained death very clearly..... (Not actually)
What about Life?
How will you use your "objectivity" to explain LIFE??
❤❤❤
It's really weird how advait philosophy or Geeta 's verses are misinterpreted and promoted. When the scripture talks about eternal consciousness , It means (upto my philosophical penetration and understanding) that :-
1. Consciousness will exist eternally wherever there is life.(Biologically)
2. In humans there is always a consciousness which exist whether you are a coward a wretched person or anything DISMAL.
3. If we were to categorize humans on different parts based on existence then we get following categorisation . :-
a. Ann b.pran c. Man d. Vigyan e. Anand ( bliss in self ) .
Now atam is like a goal,( my understanding ) , a fine point between duality where it's completely stable ( as defined by scriptures) where we humans needs to focus on .
So in a nutshell the eternal consciousness is related to the positive nature of scriptures which are required for salvation . And the concept of eternal life or life after death is related to the metamorphosis that we all need to face and a goal is required to transform so you get a subtle consciousness that is very hard to achieve and can discriminate or judge in a way that leads to best life.
well its because , Prabhupad hated advaita vedanta calling followers of it rascals and mayavaadis ,so he did hodge podge in his translation of his gita which he says"is as it is " to make people go into his cult , u can even see this today , there is a video where a follower of this cult calls Adi Shankaras philosophy a bogus philosophy
I have planned to make an account named "pretoh ka raja gubguba" And will follow you from there too 😂. Keep up the good work.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 nice name
keep digging more interesting perspectives.
Appeal to authority
brother give me a hug...
🫂
Sir,you way of speaking hindi and english is absolutely similar no one can detect that you are bilingual while speaking hindi or english.
Our genes will live more our work will live more, more than my body... But even these things have limited time... Because even humanity has a limited time until we will become extra terrestrial living creatures...
हिन्दी word jyada use करे sir
😮
Discuss also on
Parapsychology - Reincarnation - Rebirth
Science varces 😅
?
Research papers ...
Main prem hu
I don't believe the god but imao religion resembles the cultural heritage of that perticular country like you can’t destroy any historic structute irrespective of it is usefull or not like we should not destroy the religion but should eliminate bad things from this culture.people should know this is their culture that does not means god exists......i always believes that god is like complex number like complex number does not exist god does not exist but by assuming god any one can solve their so many modern day problems like fear anxiety depression
सारांश फिल्म मे भि यही कहा गया है
तुम्हारा अंत हैं.. मेरा अंत हैं... जीवन का कोई अंत नहीं है.
Aapne oshoko sayad nahi padha hai
Kya bataya hai unhone
Ek kisan(ya koi bhi shramveer) jo pure din mehnat karta hai bas iss hope me ki Bhagwan usse mehnat ka fal dega. Wo khushmizaz bhi rehta hai sabke sath(Including atheists) uske liye Atheist banna sahi hoga?
Iskcon waalo ki kuch baate Over the Top hongi par wo gareebo ko khana khilate hai bina dharm puche(same with gurudwaras)
Jin Rishi Munio ne ye customs banae honge kya wo ye nahi jante honge ki log ya to Atheist honge ya Theist? Kya Humans k faide k liye hi religion ka gathan nahi hua hoga. Ye maana ja sakta hai ki Logo se Rishi Munio ko follow nahi kiya par kya wo bilkul galat the?
What is your opinion on meditation and being in present moment
What about reincarnation
There is no self who can die fergot about rebirth
Jo bhoot dekhte yah dekhe hai bolte hai wo kiya lagta hai death ke bad se kuch related hai yeh only chemical problem hai
I have been to some of the highest points on the earth - not found gods
I have been to multiple pilgrimages - not found god
I have been to various religious buildings - never found god
I have visited the homes of a lot of religious people - didn’t see any traces of god
But I saw people come to the aid of a guy stuck underneath a burning vehicle and I saw humanity.
The places where I went where they say that “god” is to be found, I found neither god nor humanity.
Btw - this ain’t a made up post for dramatic effect . These are all my real life experiences.
Acchi hai aapki apni theory bass time pass k liye but pani ko kuch aur bol dene se pani k properties khatam nhi ho jyga pani hi rahegi 😂 ye sab time pass k liye theek h but koi conclusion nhi mila
Your thoughts on life after after death is exactly similar to the rationale given by Acharya Prashant.
we can not create and distory mater and we are mater .sooo .
Never heard of nuclear fission and fusion?
your body is matter but conciousness is just a statebit exists in now and everybody will die just like you can never destroy water it'll either be ice or vapour but not water once you heat it or freeze
I don't know but this time ur view resembles very much with Advaita philosophy, because whatever u said in the end it resembles with death of ego or I or whatever thing it is.
Yes but advaita and many other philosophical thoughts separate the ego and the soul. The "soul", in my opinion, is just a fictional extension of the "I"
@@animeshadhikary7802 no offense to ur openion but as far as I know about it i don't think so there is a separation of such kind. All I wanted to say is that how vimoh gave a perception to see death and life, from core it is resembling with Advaita philosophy.
Totally agree with you brother!
@@animeshadhikary7802the 'soul' concept is western in advaita there is aatma identical to brhman yes they are just the words but they are the outcome of deep insights
I want to clear it I am not a firm believer of Advaita or any kind of philosophy, I always want to be skeptical, this statement was purely out of my curiosity because this perticular view was resembling with that certain philosophy.
Enlightenment is the only way to get out of this subjective-objective duality
What is enlightenment? Have you attained it?
@@vimoh
Enlightenment, if such a word is necessary, is the breaking down of the illusory nature of our thoughts, fears , attachments and expectations.. It's seeing the world with fresh eyes, unclouded by our conditioning and past experiences. It is a state of self-luminous awareness, where one transcends the limitations of the body-mind complex and the notion of doership. It's complete freedom from the known. To be free of all authority, of your own and that of another, is to die to everything of yesterday, so that your mind is always fresh, always young, innocent, full of vigour and passion. It is only in that elevated state towards ultimate enlightenment that one learns and observes.
Now coming to the point that whether I am enlightened or not is I am certainly not-enlightened. If I were enlightened, I wouldn't have watched or commented on your video . There would have been no need to watch you or any other's point of view on existence for me in the state pure existence where all the confusion vanished like mist before the morning sun, leaving a clear and peaceful sky of existence-consciousness-bliss. all the doubt dissolved like sugar crystals melting in a warm cup of tea☕.
I know now you would ask what is the evidence and How do you know this ?
The answer will be my own profound mystical experience In the course of doing rigorous sadhana. I am a 19 years old boy, After exploring different traditions of Hinduism, then Buddha to osho to Krishnamurthy, I made my own Sadhana style which includes unique meditation techniques based upon observations of waves of thoughts arising from the ocean of mind given by Buddha, patanjali yog sutra ( especially Raj yoga by Swami Vivekananda) , vigyan bhairav tantra and kundalini yoga. I used to wake up at 4 am after a bathing , doing my practices. And During those days I got a profound spiritual Mystical experience which simply can't be explained to others who don't have any idea what I am talking about.
Now it's up to you how you take my opinion.. 😉
Enlightenment, if such a word is necessary, is the breaking down of the illusory nature of our thoughts, fears , attachments and expectations.. It's seeing the world with fresh eyes, unclouded by our conditioning and past experiences. It is a state of self-luminous awareness, where one transcends the limitations of the body-mind complex and the notion of doership. It's complete freedom from the known. To be free of all authority, of your own and that of another, is to die to everything of yesterday, so that your mind is always fresh, always young, innocent, full of vigour and passion. It is only in that elevated state towards ultimate enlightenment that one learns and observes.
Now coming to the point that whether I am enlightened or not is I am certainly not-enlightened. If I were enlightened, I wouldn't have watched or commented on your video . There would have been no need to watch you or any other's point of view on existence for me being in the state of pure existence where all the confusion vanished like mist before the morning sun, leaving a clear and peaceful sky of existence-consciousness-bliss. Where all the doubt dissolved like sugar crystals melting in a warm cup of tea☕.
I know now you would ask what is the evidence and How do you know this ?
The answer will be my own mystical experience In the course of doing rigorous sadhana. I am a 19 years old boy, after exploring different traditions of Hinduism then Buddha to osho , I create my unique Sadhana technique which includes meditation techniques based on the observation of waves of thoughts in the ocean of mind, patanjali yog sutra, Vigyan bhairav tantra and kundalini yoga. I used to wake up early at 4 am in the morning and after bath , doing my sadhana practices . During my practices I got a profound spiritual Mystical experience which simply can't be explained especially to the one who doesn't have any idea what I am talking about.
So at the end of the day It's up to you how you wanna take my opinion 😉
@@narayanbarman5993 You are 19 and it shows.
@@tpb1006 What does it show? 👽
I am not in the favour that god does not exist ....
As a highly spiritual person...
I believe and I have experienced that
Positivity is GOD
Negativity is DEMON
nothing else
Only the OGs know this is from nastik chai
Shh
Mai fal ban jaunga 💀
Koun sa ???
Just copy of what Hinduism and vedanta says
Humans get every single knowledge in existence. All discoveries, all inventions, all that can be known. Within that we did not see any evidence of God and thus we say that GOD definitely does not exist. Now in 2024 do we have complete knowledge? So wouldn't that make Atheism a little irrational? Shouldn't atheism encourage Agnosticism if Rationality has to be considered!!??
Please consider this as a independent question to Atheism. Hope it is not answered in terms of what about blind faith, violence, etc in religion??
Should we be agnostic towards claims of dragons, flying hippos, cosmic teddy bears, and interdimensional pixies too or is this just about that one specific claim about god?
@@vimoh particularly for the God question since we are talking about source of all.
All the examples I gave can be called the source of all.
@@vimoh so the source of all is nonsense. Still atheism looks a little irrational based on the original question!?
There may be a chance you did not understand the original question. You just replaced blind faith with unicorns and other things. So the question does not get answered. Shifting it with another question is ok upto a certain level . Say unicorns have zero existence chances, so the existence of God has zero chances. This correlation looks a little unreasonable. The intention of the first comment of mine was different.
You raise a fair point that human knowledge while vast is not absolute or complete. We have indeed made incredible discoveries and inventions but there are still frontiers of knowledge that remain unexplored or not fully understood. To claim that we have attained "every single knowledge in existence" would be an oversimplification of the limits of human understanding. Hence, the lack of complete knowledge does not automatically make atheism irrational or necessitate an agnostic position. Atheism, at its core, is the lack of belief in any deities or supernatural entities due to an absence of convincing evidence for their existence.
Jaise tumne subconsciousness or Consciousness jaise words ka use karte ho without knowing ki wo hay kea... Pehele object keya hay bha ye praman do.. Bebuniyad baat bolne se kuchu nahi hota... Maximum atheist ka problem ye hay ki sab kuch logically explain karne ki chakkar me ye bhul jate hay ki Nature paradoxical hay... Paradox ko logic se jana nahi ja sakta... This video explain nothing about the subject life after death. Sorry.
Marne ke baad kya hota hai woh duniya ka koi bhi scientist yeh proof nahi kar sakta jaise ki meri nani ko dead huwe 3 months hogaye aab meri nani kya feel kar rahi hogi kaisa mehsoos kar rahi hogi yeh koi bhi nahi bata sakta science yeh bhi kehti hai energy marti nahi hai energy can't destroyed toh insaan marne ke baad permanent khatam hojayega hojayega yah non living thing ki tarah zinda rahega kisi ko bhi nahi malum hai
Chalo bhai thik hai maan liya nature paradoxical hai usko logic se nhi jaana ja skta..... Lekin tumhe kaise pata tumhara dharm hi usko sahi tarike se explain karta hai....do you have any proof any evidence
@@strange7240 ye Dharm ka bisay nahi Darshan ka bishay hai. Aur raha proof ki baat to yea itna muskil subject hay ki isko ek comments section me discussion nahi kia ja sakta.. Aur sabse bari baat agar meine proof de bhi dia to bhi tum kuch na kuch argument doge, kiyuki tumhe man na hi nahi hay.. Is liye Atheism ko promote karo baria se aur khus raho... 🙏🙏
@@user-kt1ph9gt5oWhat is Your Opinion
Ai generated video. Friends
I recorded this on my webcam two years ago.
Now i am your follower
आपके विचारो से सहमत नही। पुरे विश्व के धर्मो एवं विश्वास है आत्मा और परमात्मा मे। क्या श्रीमद्भगवत गीता फिर गलत है? क्या आपने सब ज्ञान लेलिया कुच भी सेश नही।
क्या आप सारे dimensions के बारे मे सब कुछ जान चुके है ?
क्या जगद्गुरु शंकराचार्या विद्वान नही थे?
श्री रामकृष्ण परमहंस भी गलत। श्री चैतन्य महाप्रभु?
आपने सब जान लिया इस अहंकार मे मत रहो।
एसे बोलते है जेसे आपकी बात शेष बात है।
जेसे आपने सब proof किया।
अभी विज्ञान भी कुछ नही कह सकता।
कल को कुछ भी आश्चर्य हो सकता है।
Finally आप के विचार उन्हे जिन्होने अपने प्रिय जनो को खोया है उन्हे शान्ती नही देती। अपितु कष्ट देती है।
अगर हम विश्वास करे की मृत व्यक्तियों की आत्मा अमर है तो गलत क्या?
किसकी क्या बिगरेगी?
अपितु अपने प्रियाजनो की सलामती से शांति मिलती है विश्वास ही सही है।