A cubic meter of limestone weighs 2,711 kilograms. If immersed in water, the apparent weight of the limestone is reduced by the weight of an equal volume of water. Water weighs 997 kilograms per cubic meter. The net weight of immersed limestone thus would be 2,711 - 997 = 1,714 kilograms per cubic meter. To float this net amount, logs strapped to the limestone would have to lift 1,714 kilograms. Cedar of Lebanon weighs 580 kilograms per cubic meter, which is 417 kilograms less than a cubic meter of water. Thus a cubic meter of cedar has a "floating power" of 417 kilograms per cubic meter. How many cubic meters of cedar would be needed to float one cubic meter of immersed limestone? The answers is 1,714 divided by 417, or 4.11 cubic meters of cedar. In other words, it would take more than four times the volume of cedar to float a given volume of limestone. The video shows limestone blocks that are much larger in volume than the wood strapped to them. In fact, for the proposed method to work at all, the wood would have to be at least 4.11 times the volume of the blocks--and probably closer to 5.00 times, to compensate for the weight of the straps. To me this seems like a fatal objection to the theory. Here's another: The theory posits the use of bladders filled with air. The bladders would have to be made from animal skins, apparently. The video doesn't explain how the bladders--which would be under high pressure--could be made leak-free. And yet another objection: The video posits the use of papyrus bundles for water displacement. The video shows papyrus bundles being lowered into the locks and doubling the height of the water. That couldn't happen unless the bundles occupied every square inch of the water's original level, but that couldn't happen because the bundles themselves are not solids, no matter how tightly bound they might be. (There also would be the problem of keeping the papyrus submerged. Papyrus has a foamy interior and so easily floats--much more easily than wood. It would take a lot of auxiliary weight to keep a large bundle of papyrus submerged.) The animator deserves plaudits for a high-quality video, but the overall theory has too many leaks (pun intended), which is proof that you can show in an animation things that can't occur in real life.
@DATING HARLEY QUINN There are numerous carvings, paintings and written documentation that shows the majority of the steps involved in ancient Egyptian construction. It shows stone being quarried, dragged to and from harbours to the construction sites and it being sailed down the Nile between quarry and construction sites on ships made of either wood or papyrus. Here is a story about the discovery of a written record of a ship's captain being found www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/ Merer made a detailed record of sailing from a quarry to Giza with a cargo of quarried stone.
@DATING HARLEY QUINN I just find it deeply insulting to everyone's intelligence in that they do not look at all the evidence that has survived. They just ignore it all in favour of some bat shit crazy idea without a shred of surviving evidence. When Jean Pierre Houdin developed his theory - internal ramps - he not only looked at the evidence, but he also approached academics (like Bob Brier) to challenge his theory. Has this Massey fellow approached any Egyptologists to test out his theory? Of course not.
@DATING HARLEY QUINN Exactly. I went through a university Ancient History degree, and saw the rigor imposed on students by bloody marvelous academics. Although it was a provincial university, they were the acknowledged experts in their fields. If I had submitted this theory in an essay with this guy's "evidence", I would have had a fail. Having a theory is great. You need to back it up with evidence. Just take a look at his claim for moving the building stones. There are tomb paintings, carvings, bureaucratic records and graffiti of gangs of workers dragging the stone blocks. There are no paintings or carvings of his system. There are paintings, carvings and bureaucratic writings of the men who shipped the stone blocks in ships down the Nile. That undermines his floating stone blocks down the Nile theory.
Great presentation. Much of the huge Sydney Harbour concrete tunnel segments were constructed 100kms away at Port Kembla and floated into Sydney harbour with tug boats and accurately lowered into position.
This is the most logical answer i have seen in regards to the building of the pyramids and how they were able to get the large blocks high up. Thank you for the videos.
I don't know why it gets delete when i write it as one word 😁 But make one word of my last two answers and search it 😎 You will see a much more logical way then✌
So good! I like how they came to the solution by trial and error and weren't geniuses that had it all figured out from the beginning like I thought they were lol
A little math goes a long way. I do believe that flotation was used to maneuver the blocks from quarry sites to their final positions in the pyramid. They couldn't have used cedar for flotation, though. Too expensive, and Khufu would have deforested the Middle East before he got halfway through. They could have used papyrus in huge volumes, and they probably did, though not exclusively. The ancient Egyptians were known to use terra cotta for pipes, weren't they? Large diameter terra cotta pontoons might be utilized, possibly? If so, they'd be re-usable to a certain extent as well. All conjecture on my part, of course, without a shred of supporting evidence to be found in Egyptology, but let's ignore that for now. I never believed the idea of dragging huge blocks of stone via sleds, that's just absurd, especially with abundant water supplies right to hand and the existence of canals and causeways built into the pyramid complex. By whatever means, floats were used to transport those blocks. There is a fellow by the name of Massey who explains the practicalities and even demonstrates how the blocks could be floated to the pinnacle of the pyramid. Look for his CZcams content, very mind expanding theories. The use of water also explains (at least somewhat) the baffling structures to be found inside the pyramids - the chimney, the gallery, steeply angled tunnels, that sort of thing.
This video and the 'theory of Massey are complete and utter bollocks. There is abundant evidence that shows how it was done. The quarried stone was dragged from quarries, to a harbour where it was loaded on to a boat, barge or ship and sailed down to a harbour next to the building site. Then it was dragged from the harbour to where it was needed. We have stone carvings, paintings and written records on papyrus and pieces of broken pottery of all those stages detailing who they were, how they were organised and how they were fed. This is one link is the story of the discovery of papyrus records of an Egyptian ship's "captain" called Merer - www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
The counterweights on the papyrus see-saws used to raise the water level would negate the light papyrus from sinking very deep, thus from displacing much water.
Great idea! So can you do a version on the Serapeum and how you think it got there? Do you believe they used water to measure and cut the inside within a few ten-thousandths of an inch of laser perfection at 90 deg angles? Thanks!
You can cut granite at a length of 36 metres just by using a copper saw and sand by hand with 2 men in one year. If mechanical means was set up instead ? This would be potentially doubled 72 metres in a year
Multiple blocks where marked and cut out of the quarry out of one piece and then like a piece of paper if you slashed it with a knife into many peices will all fit back together again as a polygonal All they did was use maths and levels at the quarry and then assembled everything on site . It has been proven granite can be cut by hand at a rate of 5mm a hour . Make a wheel that is turned by the sea and let nature do it for you and then you can double that rate 10mm a hour in one year you have alot of work done
Why don't you try to make a water tight wooden water lock like proposed in this video ? Should be interesting ? One that can slide up and down under load ..
The answer is obvious and easy to work out. The input of geology and geophysics, which lie within the domain of Geotechnical Engineering, is indispensible in archeology. Geophysical investigations are one of the primary tools used in detection of buried monuments. Geology can provide invaluable help to enhance the survival of old monuments especially if they are built from stone or rest on rock. In my opinion, the same geotechnical aspects of Engineering can be adopted not only in detection of the reasons for the vanishing of some monuments but to investigate the reasons behind the long “good” performance and survival of some old pyramids. Therefore, to explore the Geotechnical Engineering in the Great Egyptian Pharaonic Civilization will be the answer because Egypt and the Pyramids are, to many, synonymous. Millions of people travel from all over the world to see the Egyptian Pyramids, the largest stone structures ever built. They are considered by many to be the greatest buildings ever constructed. No certain conclusions have ever been reached in this regard even with the modern investigations especially the stability of the Giza Pyramids including its associated geotechnical aspects. Regardless of the unsolved riddles for the reason for building the Pyramids and the technique(s) employed to build these massive structures, different geotechnical failures would have been inevitable had the Pharaohs chosen to build the Pyramids along the Nile valley where they lived. It is amazing to note that the maximum static stress under the Greater Pyramids is about 3500 kPa; yet this huge stress value did not entail any observed or likely foundation failure (bearing capacity or excessive settlement). Geological studies (Said, 1990)show that the huge monuments of the fourth dynasty of the plateau of Giza are built on a sedimentary sequence that consists mainly of carbonate rock formations deposited in a marine environment of variable depths. These sedimentary layers have the characteristics of the Mokattam formation and Madi formation, from Middle to Late Eocenne age which is formed of masive limestones and dolomites. This formation is considered a suitable foundation that can safely support the massive rock structure. Interestingly, mappings of tectonic structures found in the chamber to avoid the fragility veins involved in the chamber.The builders again integrated the fault surface into the design of the chamber, and may even have adjusted the height of the ceiling accordingly to be precision of the chamber for the storage energy purposes and related to safety radiations, short circuits from electrical wiring, temperature differentiation of the rocks, moisture control and etc.. in other words, effective sealings and alignments utmost important in chamber engineering design. The Ancient Egyptians left a wealth of knowledge behind them that we are still don't know and trying to reveal. Geology is the base of geotechnical engineering. The Ancient Egyptians knew geology and made use of it. They drew the geological and topographic map, identifying different lithological units. Their knowledge of geology allowed them to mine, tunnel, quarry and make best use of rock discontinuities as well as avert/accommodate many distressing effects on their tunnels and extracted rock blocks. Choice of locations for their great buildings and temples is a geotechnical marvel. Also refer to for moving the rocks into height and landing (proper levitation technology) by applying the rock cycle activated from the energy stored in the chamber inside the pyramid with the help of electrons or electricity to keep the rock moving, remotely prior to landing powered by the sun. Refer to :opentextbc.ca/geology/chapter/3-1-the-rock-cycle/ and analogous to water.usgs.gov/edu/gallery/watercyclekids/sun-earth.html.
So like most cultures people use what they are already using to do other things. The US has a car culture, so everything is based around a car. I love your theory. I think before they built the pyramids they probably used this technology to keep their farms intact during the seasonal flooding. They would have use for moving huge blocks to stop the river from eroding their soil. They would need to have the means to stack the blocks and move them up higher. Otherwise, each farm plot would be erased by the river. Maybe they first moved blocks to mark where each farm started and stopped. Or they moved blocks to keep docks in place instead of having to rebuild the dock each year out of mud and wood. Given that wood was in short supply, it makes sense that they would turn to limestone.
Se perdemos informações de coisas feitas a mil anos atrás, muito mais de 3, 4 ou 8 mil anos atrás... Algo muito forte aconteceu no nosso planeta a ponto de apagar o tempo nas marcas que registram a história desse mundo aqui. E o que teria sido isso ?
How do we move this 80 ton block? Oh just blow up some animal skins and build an enormous lock and water trough larger than the pyramid itself? Okay, that should work. 🤣
A creative, refreshing theory relative to a dogmatic "not even possible with today's technology". Memories popped up about a video of a man demonstrating moving stonehenge sized obelisks with bare hands and wooden tools. Demystified to carrying up a lake. Hmm.. A construction that scoops up water, driven by camels. A water-elevator. A shaft filled with water. At the bottom an enclosed waterlock where the stonerafts are pushed in. Close a door, open another, stoneraft floats to the top. No need for quantum bit here.
Just as bullshit as the Ancient Aliens crap though. For example, the stone blocks were taken by ship, barge and boat down the Nile from the quarries. Here is a story about the papyrus records of Merer, a ship's "captain" being found www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
In Al-Quran (Islamic Holy Book) said 1400 years ago that Pharaoh build the pyramid (tower) was using "baked clay" instead of limestones (baked clay turn into rock limestone after thousand of year process ) and I believe is true because there is no such technology at that time In how to pull and lift a heavy rock limestone. Many Scientist thought that pyramid were built by pull and lifting the limestone using temporary water canal and hang it with wood in the water (Buoyancy weight) or rail tunnel to transport the limestone rock from bottom to the top. It's an insane method and if it's true the people in egypt will build the other things with this "insane method" and also people in egypt can create a heavy duty wire-rope and make a good tools to cut precision the limestones as well. This is my opinion: The pharaoh was instructing Haman (Architect ministry of ancient Egypt kingdom) and their slaves to made giant statue or big bricks from mud clay and arranged them as base foundation, after that when the stone clay molds were still wet they did the engraving (Hieroglif) at the big stone (mud clay) walls and when they want to continue the work by making them higher they burnt it first and repeat it step by step until the top of pyramid done. Scientist just need to prove that mixed material of "baked clay" can be turn into the limestone after three thousand years process
Bro i don't think Egyptian made pyramids its made by Atlantians otherwise there will be maps contruction method on their pyramid survive apocalyptic events that happens 15000 to 7500 years ago
Their names weren't Jeff and Eddie, but Leroy and D'Andre and as today they could jump a 6' fence with a TV under each arm, so moving the blocks was no problem.
And then they can only move blocks a few months a year.. And it took how long to build a pyramid? Using people that should be growing food for people to eat. And how many people are even capable of doing heavy manual labor in that kind of heat?
There is no mystery as to how the Pyramids were built. That's just a myth that is perpetuated by hacks who want you to buy their books and attend their lectures. This animation just shows how common sense could be used to solve all of the construction challenges.
Never in a million yrs did this happen . It’s muck like cast in situ loads of sand nice an easy an has turned into stone over the yrs. one look at a massive stone an you would say no way bud
I have 2 say the theory of How the pyramids were really built? Is very interesting to me. Seems plausible although I'm no civil engineer or otherwise 😕😕😕😕 Oh, this cartoon thing is shite btw!!! Peace bros greetings from Birkenhead, Merseyside 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 ♥ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️
I only watch bcuz of animation not cuz of ur ideas. Do u real think they've had that many chances to failure or options..? No. Their cruel pharaohs never gave em that many chances b4 they get executed.
All these solutions regarding the use of water just does not seem feasible. Creating locks that sealed well enough would have been nearly impossible for them.
@@KodeKween Jesus bloody hell!! There are numerous paintings and carvings of people moving stone blocks on boats, barges and ships made of papyrus and wood. There are numerous paintings and carvings of people dragging blocks using wooden rollers, lubricated with poured water to create a slippery surface. There are NO, NONE, ZILCH or absolutely sod all paintings or carvings, or papyrus records to back up ANY of the BULLSHIT proposed by this channel. Here is a story about Merer's papyrus records being found. www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
Mali chlapec 🧒 videl som prvý krát v knihe púšť hneď som videl vodu ovocie vodu farba sa zmenila otvoril som atlas v škole videl som obraz rozšíriť pevninu nad oceánom ľahšie na zemi než na Marse
A cubic meter of limestone weighs 2,711 kilograms. If immersed in water, the apparent weight of the limestone is reduced by the weight of an equal volume of water. Water weighs 997 kilograms per cubic meter. The net weight of immersed limestone thus would be 2,711 - 997 = 1,714 kilograms per cubic meter. To float this net amount, logs strapped to the limestone would have to lift 1,714 kilograms.
Cedar of Lebanon weighs 580 kilograms per cubic meter, which is 417 kilograms less than a cubic meter of water. Thus a cubic meter of cedar has a "floating power" of 417 kilograms per cubic meter. How many cubic meters of cedar would be needed to float one cubic meter of immersed limestone?
The answers is 1,714 divided by 417, or 4.11 cubic meters of cedar. In other words, it would take more than four times the volume of cedar to float a given volume of limestone.
The video shows limestone blocks that are much larger in volume than the wood strapped to them. In fact, for the proposed method to work at all, the wood would have to be at least 4.11 times the volume of the blocks--and probably closer to 5.00 times, to compensate for the weight of the straps.
To me this seems like a fatal objection to the theory.
Here's another: The theory posits the use of bladders filled with air. The bladders would have to be made from animal skins, apparently. The video doesn't explain how the bladders--which would be under high pressure--could be made leak-free.
And yet another objection: The video posits the use of papyrus bundles for water displacement. The video shows papyrus bundles being lowered into the locks and doubling the height of the water. That couldn't happen unless the bundles occupied every square inch of the water's original level, but that couldn't happen because the bundles themselves are not solids, no matter how tightly bound they might be. (There also would be the problem of keeping the papyrus submerged. Papyrus has a foamy interior and so easily floats--much more easily than wood. It would take a lot of auxiliary weight to keep a large bundle of papyrus submerged.)
The animator deserves plaudits for a high-quality video, but the overall theory has too many leaks (pun intended), which is proof that you can show in an animation things that can't occur in real life.
Aliens made it
@DATING HARLEY QUINN There are numerous carvings, paintings and written documentation that shows the majority of the steps involved in ancient Egyptian construction. It shows stone being quarried, dragged to and from harbours to the construction sites and it being sailed down the Nile between quarry and construction sites on ships made of either wood or papyrus. Here is a story about the discovery of a written record of a ship's captain being found www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/ Merer made a detailed record of sailing from a quarry to Giza with a cargo of quarried stone.
@DATING HARLEY QUINN I just find it deeply insulting to everyone's intelligence in that they do not look at all the evidence that has survived. They just ignore it all in favour of some bat shit crazy idea without a shred of surviving evidence. When Jean Pierre Houdin developed his theory - internal ramps - he not only looked at the evidence, but he also approached academics (like Bob Brier) to challenge his theory. Has this Massey fellow approached any Egyptologists to test out his theory? Of course not.
@DATING HARLEY QUINN Exactly. I went through a university Ancient History degree, and saw the rigor imposed on students by bloody marvelous academics. Although it was a provincial university, they were the acknowledged experts in their fields. If I had submitted this theory in an essay with this guy's "evidence", I would have had a fail.
Having a theory is great. You need to back it up with evidence. Just take a look at his claim for moving the building stones. There are tomb paintings, carvings, bureaucratic records and graffiti of gangs of workers dragging the stone blocks. There are no paintings or carvings of his system. There are paintings, carvings and bureaucratic writings of the men who shipped the stone blocks in ships down the Nile. That undermines his floating stone blocks down the Nile theory.
Absolutely right boss
Same think here
Great presentation.
Much of the huge Sydney Harbour concrete tunnel segments were constructed 100kms away at Port Kembla and floated into Sydney harbour with tug boats and accurately lowered into position.
Is this series going to stretch the entire 20 years that the original construction of the pyramid allegedly took?
Lol. Yeah I think so.
I’m loving the animation!! 😆😆😆
Part 3? This is great stuff. Thank you for these
Best and clear animation..waiting for the next one..
This is the most logical answer i have seen in regards to the building of the pyramids and how they were able to get the large blocks high up. Thank you for the videos.
Geopolymere
Institut
I don't know why it gets delete when i write it as one word 😁
But make one word of my last two answers and search it 😎
You will see a much more logical way then✌
This was great! I subscribed right away.
These are great!
amazing how animation grossly oversimplifies a procedure like this. There are many crazy ideas about pyramid construction, this is just one.
Really cool little series!very interesting theory very fun!
So good! I like how they came to the solution by trial and error and weren't geniuses that had it all figured out from the beginning like I thought they were lol
Fool
You do know he's just making this up?
Good information sir
i loved the script in animation..❤️and i subrcibed it❣️
Just to build a complex lock system like that would be a wonder greater than the pyramids.
Haha so true
How many wood you need to make a big block float?
A little math goes a long way. I do believe that flotation was used to maneuver the blocks from quarry sites to their final positions in the pyramid. They couldn't have used cedar for flotation, though. Too expensive, and Khufu would have deforested the Middle East before he got halfway through.
They could have used papyrus in huge volumes, and they probably did, though not exclusively. The ancient Egyptians were known to use terra cotta for pipes, weren't they? Large diameter terra cotta pontoons might be utilized, possibly? If so, they'd be re-usable to a certain extent as well. All conjecture on my part, of course, without a shred of supporting evidence to be found in Egyptology, but let's ignore that for now.
I never believed the idea of dragging huge blocks of stone via sleds, that's just absurd, especially with abundant water supplies right to hand and the existence of canals and causeways built into the pyramid complex.
By whatever means, floats were used to transport those blocks. There is a fellow by the name of Massey who explains the practicalities and even demonstrates how the blocks could be floated to the pinnacle of the pyramid. Look for his CZcams content, very mind expanding theories. The use of water also explains (at least somewhat) the baffling structures to be found inside the pyramids - the chimney, the gallery, steeply angled tunnels, that sort of thing.
This video and the 'theory of Massey are complete and utter bollocks. There is abundant evidence that shows how it was done. The quarried stone was dragged from quarries, to a harbour where it was loaded on to a boat, barge or ship and sailed down to a harbour next to the building site. Then it was dragged from the harbour to where it was needed. We have stone carvings, paintings and written records on papyrus and pieces of broken pottery of all those stages detailing who they were, how they were organised and how they were fed. This is one link is the story of the discovery of papyrus records of an Egyptian ship's "captain" called Merer - www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
Thank you very much indeed Sir, watching from apartment in west java, java island in Indonesia
I love some of the theories here.
"Cows and camels working together, in perfect sequence" AAAAHAHAHAHAAAAA
wonderful
The locks only work when there is a continuous supply of water at the higher elevation. There is no such supply of water at the site of the pyramid.
Don't forget to mention GPT-3 content generator was utilized for this narrative idea
Oooooh...finally...part 2 is published🤩🤩🤩....will we wait another year for part 3?
At least
Still waiting…
Part 3 is published
It's a cool little cartoon about a theory that has been around for years.
The counterweights on the papyrus see-saws used to raise the water level would negate the light papyrus from sinking very deep, thus from displacing much water.
Dear sir i want to know how did they
cut stones ?
I'm laughing if you think they pulled 80 ton rocks anywhere..
Finally waiting is over
We want a part 3,4,5,6-100
Muy muy bueno, sigue así
Great idea! So can you do a version on the Serapeum and how you think it got there? Do you believe they used water to measure and cut the inside within a few ten-thousandths of an inch of laser perfection at 90 deg angles? Thanks!
You can cut granite at a length of 36 metres just by using a copper saw and sand by hand with 2 men in one year.
If mechanical means was set up instead ? This would be potentially doubled
72 metres in a year
Multiple blocks where marked and cut out of the quarry out of one piece and then like a piece of paper if you slashed it with a knife into many peices will all fit back together again as a polygonal
All they did was use maths and levels at the quarry and then assembled everything on site . It has been proven granite can be cut by hand at a rate of 5mm a hour .
Make a wheel that is turned by the sea and let nature do it for you and then you can double that rate
10mm a hour in one year you have alot of work done
If they did it like this the shape of area would have still remain the same, even when lakes dry up the area still have some of that structure left
If this idea works then it would be used on the other 2 Pyramids on Giza. Does it work for those two?
It doesn't work
How the water is flowing in a plain land without any force or how water rises up to the top without force??
I would be very surprised if the ancient Egyptians were able to construct canals with locks like that...
If this was true, why do all the pictures they drew of the construction depict blocks being pulled on sleds.
There are no ancient Egyptian pictures of blocks being pulled in sleds.
2:17 please revive him 😂
Part 1, cute. Part 2, needs a lot of work (but still cute.)
I don't know, but this is interesting.👍
I want to download it please suggest me how
I love how accurately this series portrays the Ancient Egyptians.
this is a great theory, but its brought down by one question. where are these locks? im a dumb person so correct me if im wrong
Why don't you try to make a water tight wooden water lock like proposed in this video ? Should be interesting ? One that can slide up and down under load ..
Part 3
And just how many people did it take to dig all those ditches without a shovel?
I still don't understand why this channel has gotten so much hate.
This basic idea seems reasonable to me.
#3 ?? Where ?
The answer is obvious and easy to work out. The input of geology and geophysics, which lie within the domain of Geotechnical Engineering, is indispensible in archeology. Geophysical investigations are one of the primary tools used in detection of buried monuments. Geology can provide invaluable help to enhance the survival of old monuments especially if they are built from stone or rest on rock. In my opinion, the same geotechnical aspects of Engineering can be adopted not only in detection of the reasons for the vanishing of some monuments but to investigate the reasons behind the long “good” performance and survival of some old pyramids. Therefore, to explore the Geotechnical Engineering in the Great Egyptian Pharaonic Civilization will be the answer because Egypt and the Pyramids are, to many, synonymous. Millions of people
travel from all over the world to see the Egyptian Pyramids, the largest stone structures ever built. They are considered by many to be the greatest buildings ever constructed. No certain conclusions have ever been reached in this regard even with the modern investigations especially the stability of the Giza Pyramids including its associated geotechnical aspects. Regardless of the unsolved riddles for the reason for building the Pyramids and the technique(s) employed to build these massive structures, different geotechnical failures would have been inevitable had the Pharaohs chosen to build the Pyramids along the Nile valley where they lived. It is amazing to note that the maximum static stress under the Greater Pyramids is about 3500 kPa; yet this huge stress value did not entail any observed or likely foundation failure (bearing capacity or excessive settlement). Geological studies (Said, 1990)show that the huge monuments of the fourth dynasty of the plateau of Giza are built on a sedimentary sequence that consists mainly of carbonate rock formations deposited in a marine environment of variable depths. These sedimentary layers have the characteristics of the Mokattam formation and Madi formation, from Middle to Late Eocenne age which is formed of masive limestones and dolomites. This formation is considered a suitable foundation that can safely support the massive rock structure. Interestingly, mappings of tectonic structures found in the chamber to avoid the fragility veins involved in the chamber.The builders again integrated the fault surface into the design of the chamber, and may even
have adjusted the height of the ceiling accordingly to be precision of the chamber for the storage energy purposes and related to safety radiations, short circuits from electrical wiring, temperature differentiation of the rocks, moisture control and etc.. in other words, effective sealings and alignments utmost important in chamber engineering design. The Ancient Egyptians left a wealth of knowledge behind them that we are still don't know and trying to reveal. Geology is the base of geotechnical engineering. The Ancient Egyptians knew geology and made use of it. They drew the geological and topographic map, identifying different lithological
units. Their knowledge of geology allowed them to mine, tunnel, quarry and make best use of rock discontinuities as well as avert/accommodate many distressing effects on their tunnels and extracted rock blocks. Choice of locations for their great buildings and temples is a geotechnical marvel. Also refer to for moving the rocks into height and landing (proper levitation technology) by applying the rock cycle activated from the energy stored in the chamber inside the pyramid with the help of electrons or electricity to keep the rock moving, remotely prior to landing powered by the sun. Refer to :opentextbc.ca/geology/chapter/3-1-the-rock-cycle/ and analogous to water.usgs.gov/edu/gallery/watercyclekids/sun-earth.html.
So like most cultures people use what they are already using to do other things. The US has a car culture, so everything is based around a car. I love your theory. I think before they built the pyramids they probably used this technology to keep their farms intact during the seasonal flooding. They would have use for moving huge blocks to stop the river from eroding their soil. They would need to have the means to stack the blocks and move them up higher. Otherwise, each farm plot would be erased by the river. Maybe they first moved blocks to mark where each farm started and stopped. Or they moved blocks to keep docks in place instead of having to rebuild the dock each year out of mud and wood. Given that wood was in short supply, it makes sense that they would turn to limestone.
Se perdemos informações de coisas feitas a mil anos atrás, muito mais de 3, 4 ou 8 mil anos atrás... Algo muito forte aconteceu no nosso planeta a ponto de apagar o tempo nas marcas que registram a história desse mundo aqui. E o que teria sido isso ?
Part 3?
How do we move this 80 ton block? Oh just blow up some animal skins and build an enormous lock and water trough larger than the pyramid itself? Okay, that should work. 🤣
Something worked. This could be it
A creative, refreshing theory relative to a dogmatic "not even possible with today's technology". Memories popped up about a video of a man demonstrating moving stonehenge sized obelisks with bare hands and wooden tools. Demystified to carrying up a lake. Hmm.. A construction that scoops up water, driven by camels. A water-elevator. A shaft filled with water. At the bottom an enclosed waterlock where the stonerafts are pushed in. Close a door, open another, stoneraft floats to the top. No need for quantum bit here.
Just as bullshit as the Ancient Aliens crap though. For example, the stone blocks were taken by ship, barge and boat down the Nile from the quarries. Here is a story about the papyrus records of Merer, a ship's "captain" being found www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
Where is part 3
Fun
Fantastic... oh sorry I miss spoke I meant fantasy.
Damn the details sure are detailed. Don't want to be rude but this is just a cartoon, with a very cartoonish theory...
I love everything about this. I don't believe it for a second, but this is great.
Hi bro I want job please give me job
The ancient Egyptians must have had good life if they had the time to build these useless pyramids
They did have a good life, at least the wealthy did.
In Al-Quran (Islamic Holy Book) said 1400 years ago that Pharaoh build the pyramid (tower) was using "baked clay" instead of limestones (baked clay turn into rock limestone after thousand of year process ) and I believe is true because there is no such technology at that time In how to pull and lift a heavy rock limestone.
Many Scientist thought that pyramid were built by pull and lifting the limestone using temporary water canal and hang it with wood in the water (Buoyancy weight) or rail tunnel to transport the limestone rock from bottom to the top. It's an insane method and if it's true the people in egypt will build the other things with this "insane method" and also people in egypt can create a heavy duty wire-rope and make a good tools to cut precision the limestones as well.
This is my opinion: The pharaoh was instructing Haman (Architect ministry of ancient Egypt kingdom) and their slaves to made giant statue or big bricks from mud clay and arranged them as base foundation, after that when the stone clay molds were still wet they did the engraving (Hieroglif) at the big stone (mud clay) walls and when they want to continue the work by making them higher they burnt it first and repeat it step by step until the top of pyramid done.
Scientist just need to prove that mixed material of "baked clay" can be turn into the limestone after three thousand years process
Said something similar for years your spot on it’s the only feesable answer
part 3
Bro i don't think Egyptian made pyramids its made by Atlantians otherwise there will be maps contruction method on their pyramid survive apocalyptic events that happens 15000 to 7500 years ago
You just don't think
Next part 🙄
Again a theory. What is the proof that they built pyramids by this water theory
None
It's a shame they did away with these beautiful pools and causeways.
Their names weren't Jeff and Eddie, but Leroy and D'Andre and as today they could jump a 6' fence with a TV under each arm, so moving the blocks was no problem.
I guess there will always be people like you in the world. Shame.
@@coloneled2831 The real shame is that there are always people like Leroy and D'Andre.
And then they can only move blocks a few months a year.. And it took how long to build a pyramid? Using people that should be growing food for people to eat. And how many people are even capable of doing heavy manual labor in that kind of heat?
About 20yrs, with the skilled workers being employed full time
Way to go boys.
There is no mystery as to how the Pyramids were built. That's just a myth that is perpetuated by hacks who want you to buy their books and attend their lectures. This animation just shows how common sense could be used to solve all of the construction challenges.
Never in a million yrs did this happen . It’s muck like cast in situ loads of sand nice an easy an has turned into stone over the yrs. one look at a massive stone an you would say no way bud
Egyptian were not like Arabs but i like the black African colour you us thanks
@Gamal Nasser where are they ancestors comes from?what is ancestors name of Egypt,and Egyptians?
And so...?
I have 2 say the theory of How the pyramids were really built? Is very interesting to me. Seems plausible although I'm no civil engineer or otherwise 😕😕😕😕 Oh, this cartoon thing is shite btw!!! Peace bros greetings from Birkenhead, Merseyside 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 ♥ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️ ♥️
I only watch bcuz of animation not cuz of ur ideas. Do u real think they've had that many chances to failure or options..? No. Their cruel pharaohs never gave em that many chances b4 they get executed.
There weren't enough workers in Egypt to do this
All these solutions regarding the use of water just does not seem feasible. Creating locks that sealed well enough would have been nearly impossible for them.
There were enough, but it still wouldn't work
Great video. You are wrong, but great video!
Why?
We know they used a causeway that lead to the pyramid site. How is this theory so wrong?
@@KodeKween Jesus bloody hell!! There are numerous paintings and carvings of people moving stone blocks on boats, barges and ships made of papyrus and wood. There are numerous paintings and carvings of people dragging blocks using wooden rollers, lubricated with poured water to create a slippery surface. There are NO, NONE, ZILCH or absolutely sod all paintings or carvings, or papyrus records to back up ANY of the BULLSHIT proposed by this channel. Here is a story about Merer's papyrus records being found. www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ancient-egypt-shipping-mining-farming-economy-pyramids-180956619/
Интересно а как они клали последние камни на самой вершины без воды?
Mali chlapec 🧒 videl som prvý krát v knihe púšť hneď som videl vodu ovocie vodu farba sa zmenila otvoril som atlas v škole videl som obraz rozšíriť pevninu nad oceánom ľahšie na zemi než na Marse
This is cant be real technology
Mali chlapec 🧒 videl som veľké veci malé ťažké ľahké veľkú výšku malú dĺžku šírku veľkú vzdalenost som cítil malou rýchlosťou blízko
Ja a môj kamarát sme zdvihli asi 80 kg váhy len z dvoma prstami ktoré ne vážia ani ne celi gram nikdy som sa to neskúsil
to samé auto som videl dvakrát menšie opačne dva krát veľké to samé auto
Hey honey 😍
Hye baby
@@mitharav3435thank you baby 😍 I got 2 like I'm so happy baby 😍
That’s what happens if you let blacks built a pyramid 😂😂😂😂
Po druhé svetové vojne som nevedel existuje smrť
Liar
What a rubish explanation..
This video should show anti grave lifts provided by aliens.