Fantastic band! This musicians is beautifuls.....Glenn is very fantastic bass player and vocalist magistral.....thank you so much for pubblication.....ciao
Everyone comparing the two Joes, but styles make the player. With Satriani, he incorpates the high volume and performance "Super-Strat" guitars that EVH made popular in the 80s. With two handed tapping and generous use of the double locking tremolo systems on his guitars. A very 80s style and approach. Bonanassa on the other hand, is as close to a throwback type of player that I've listened to in a while. Preferring to use vintage guitars and sometimes amps, with a very bluesy style that uses arpeggios, double-stop bends, minor chord pentatonics. A very late 60s and 70s style approach, pretty much what the heavy hitters in the days of Zeppelin and Deep Purple were doing. Since BCC plays classic 70s style rock, Bonanassa is a perfect fit for the band. But both Joes are incredible talents in their own unique way. 🎸🎸
Man, I like that guitar riff that this song breaks down to. To each their own but I like this kind of driving song with the bass, guitar, and drum all playing the same riff.
super band no doubt great sound and players.. However Joe is in my opinion a different guitar player although a great rocker as well.. With his talent one has to understand that no matter what he plays it's just plain " awesome "... His future is doing a solo career vs playing with this super band.. SwB
both are pretty amazing but BCC is a lot more British sounding and Chickenfoot are a lot more American,and then theres Vultures which is basically designed from NME.
No doubt, Chickenfoot has better players. Sorry, just sayin'. Been playin' awhile and that's an easy one. Sammy can roll with Glenn. And Satch? Discussion over.........
the big difference beteween this band and Chickenfoot is that BCC has soem material worthy of their individual talents ! I agree about Chickenfoots songs having a great groove and feel , but Hagar is as shallow and cheesy as it gets when it comes to lyrics.He absolutely does not grow as an artists . Hughes has grown and he was great in the first place .
I won't disagree on this one since Satch is a bit more of a versatile player and Glenn did have to grow on me a bit. I will say that, for the amazing lineup, I was pretty disappointed with the Chickenfoot albums. The music was great, every song has such a strong groove, but Sammy's songs were so stupid. My initial reaction was really good, but the more I listened to it, the less I liked it. BCC is equal to the sum of all the parts, but Chickenfoot is decidedly less than what it could have been.
Oh my Lord this is 10 years old where have I been an amazing power band
Wow what a song this is a perfect example of incredible talent and bad to the Bone showmanship coming together absolutely fantastic
Fantastic band! This musicians is beautifuls.....Glenn is very fantastic bass player and vocalist magistral.....thank you so much for pubblication.....ciao
I loooove Glenn! He’s a great soul singer, and BCC is the perfect band for him !!!!
I have been a Bonamassa fan every since Bloodline. It just keeps gettin' better. Rock on!
No one like Joe....the man can Rock, play Blues like no tomarrow, Sing.....and never seems to run out of energy...he's incredible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone comparing the two Joes, but styles make the player. With Satriani, he incorpates the high volume and performance "Super-Strat" guitars that EVH made popular in the 80s. With two handed tapping and generous use of the double locking tremolo systems on his guitars. A very 80s style and approach. Bonanassa on the other hand, is as close to a throwback type of player that I've listened to in a while. Preferring to use vintage guitars and sometimes amps, with a very bluesy style that uses arpeggios, double-stop bends, minor chord pentatonics. A very late 60s and 70s style approach, pretty much what the heavy hitters in the days of Zeppelin and Deep Purple were doing. Since BCC plays classic 70s style rock, Bonanassa is a perfect fit for the band. But both Joes are incredible talents in their own unique way. 🎸🎸
Fantastic live for simply brilliant song. BCC hell yeah!
Makes me fell so good about useing Jazz III Picks
Man, I like that guitar riff that this song breaks down to. To each their own but I like this kind of driving song with the bass, guitar, and drum all playing the same riff.
amazing.. live. I had not even a baldy who they were. but I left feeling . my god I want some of that....
Grandissimi!!!!!!!##
Awesome even when not given a chance he! Impressive band, to say the least.
Bruce Willis has put on a few pounds, but he's rockin' the **** outta the drums on this one!
I think you got mixed up with the movies
G.Hughes reminds me of Scott Wieland if he played bass.
don't know if they sound like sabbath but the recommendation was probably because of glenn, who sang on 7th star and recorded 2 more albums with iommi
So I'll ask the question. Do you like these songs?
Glenn Hughes rocks...
super band no doubt great sound and players.. However Joe is in my opinion a different guitar player although a great rocker as well.. With his talent one has to understand that no matter what he plays it's just plain " awesome "... His future is doing a solo career vs playing with this super band.. SwB
Glenn F'in Hughes!
both are pretty amazing but BCC is a lot more British sounding and Chickenfoot are a lot more American,and then theres Vultures which is basically designed from NME.
@VonSeux hahahahaha Europe! youre hilarious!
Apologies to everyone who disagrees, but Bonamassa destroys Satriani. It's not an opinion, it's a fact!
Joe should dress like the bass player
@metledsabbsthica : Sorry I disagree...Bonamassa and Satch are Brill but I think the backing line up of Chickenfoot are better....sorry man..
CompaRing CF to BCC - BCC by a KO. Give me a break.
I love BCC but fuck,Glenn has hair like my nan.
wow bcc is so much better then chickenfoot.
No doubt, Chickenfoot has better players. Sorry, just sayin'. Been playin' awhile and that's an easy one. Sammy can roll with Glenn. And Satch? Discussion over.........
the big difference beteween this band and Chickenfoot is that BCC has soem material worthy of their individual talents ! I agree about Chickenfoots songs having a great groove and feel , but Hagar is as shallow and cheesy as it gets when it comes to lyrics.He absolutely does not grow as an artists . Hughes has grown and he was great in the first place .
I won't disagree on this one since Satch is a bit more of a versatile player and Glenn did have to grow on me a bit. I will say that, for the amazing lineup, I was pretty disappointed with the Chickenfoot albums. The music was great, every song has such a strong groove, but Sammy's songs were so stupid. My initial reaction was really good, but the more I listened to it, the less I liked it. BCC is equal to the sum of all the parts, but Chickenfoot is decidedly less than what it could have been.
I love Joe B., But Joe S. takes his lunch money straight away.........
I try but just can't enjoy BCC ... rather listen to Chickenfoot or Europe
Chickenfoot is pop rock compared to these guys