My True Ancestry Review & Personal Analysis
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 02. 2020
- A look at My True Ancestry .com (Which I refer to as My Ancient Ancestry) and my personal results.
Support the channel, get additional content, request videos, etc.
/ fortressoflugh
You can also donate through the donate button on the website
www.fortressoflugh.com/
/ fortressoflugh
Seriously? You question the fact you have visgothic ancestry on your mothers side from 550AD ? It's no implausible in the tens of thousands of ancestors you would have from this date. Apart from that I enjoyed the video
Agree… nit picking
Lets not forget that as much as we aquire DNA at each generation, we also lose some of it. We may have distant ancestors of whom we do no longer carry any DNA.
Thank you so much for going through the trouble of simplifying all this information! I like history, so I was familiar with many of the populations represented on this site, but was lost as far as the biological data. This was super helpful!
Very cool stuff, I was looking forward to this video.
Thank you for this video.It was very helpful.
I completely agree with your theory, very perceptive. When I saw the results, that is also what I thought. This test is interesting in that is scales you next to admixture averages, but it does not really tell you from who exactly are you descended from directly (in general)
I used this website for free and wondered is I should pay and upgrade to knight. I couldn’t find any CZcams videos in which people had higher level than free, and happy to see yours. Thanks for video.
P.s. I’m Kievan Rus, Avar, Scythian, Early Slav, Swedish Viking mostly
I bought Footman (because it's on sale right now) with the idea I would upgrade to Knight later. I'm not sure I see a huge difference between levels.
I'm Mexican American from California. So I got Carthage Phoenician Al Andalusia (Spain), Hispania-Roman. Basically ancient Mediterranean which to me makes all the sense in the world.
czcams.com/video/YikcGY0zA2w/video.html
my results are very very similar to yours. Majority of my ancestry is from Northern England, Scotland and Ireland. I’m also a Canadian. Visigoth+Celt was my top match to
The pie break down isn’t how much % you Mach with them but what percentage of your samples are of that group, it changes with however many samples there are for each group on the site.
I used this site and found broadly similar results. Known ancestry scots irish dane reflects the north west diasapora. I suppose the recombination of genomic cultural cousins takes us back to the beaker folk. Our common ancestors. I also recieved the medal icon for bronze age samples due to the chain length. A good site if only to somewhat clarify what has been presented in recent genomic studies about ancient populations
How many actual Visigoth samples are available and from which area ? How genetically similar are later Visigoths to the original Gothic Population from which Visigoths and Ostrogoths descended ? This could influence what we see because there was a lot of migration and admixing going on along the way....
There was. The visigoths and ostrogoths can be thought of as equally distant from the original goths that originated in Scandinavia. However they were not separated for that long and can be thought of as simply east and west goths. The only genetic differences are likely due to their surroundings. So ostrogoths are going to have traces of scythian dna whereas the visigoths will likely have a slight admixture of gaulic or celtic dna. How genetically similar groups are is irrelevant to this test. They simply identify burials that belong to certain cultures and measure how how close you are to any given sample in comparison to all others being tested. So when you're seeing people post percentages of certain groups that is the wrong way to look at it.
I for instance had mainly a scythian and avar ancient match, and the fourth closest match I had were the ostrogoths. This genetic connection is most likely due to your ancestors being polish or ukrainian and living near where the goths were assimilated into local culture.
@@Benaddicted11trkfbal It was my understanding that the Ostrogoths were the original main branch and then split into the Visigoths and later Franks. My closest ancient population is Visigoth-Scythian, more heavy in Gaul DNA but also have very prevalent Celtic DNA, there are little genetic differences between these peoples, they are literally brother people.
Visigoths are member of a division of the Goths. One of the most important of the Germanic peoples, the Visigoths separated from the Ostrogoths in the 4th century ad, raided Roman territories repeatedly, and established great kingdoms in Gaul and Spain.
what is the dif' between
GREEN Ancient Sample matches
and PURPLE Deep Dive matches (matching DNA segments)
which is the closest related to me ?
Thanks for explaining ! I’m Mexican and my top result was Roman I’m guessing from Spain. My results are pretty crazy and confusing because there’s so much going on 😬 in matching samples I got Bronze Age southern levant as my 1st
Hispano-Roman or Roman? Also my top results were Gallo-Roman, from France. Also I'm Mexican as well
I got Bronze age Levant as well, also Phillistine, hittites and lot of semitic samples and I'm from Brazil, probably comes from the Iberian. The Roman is central Roman, the Roman from Iberia is "Roman Hispania".
@@amandacarvalhodegenhardt8364 czcams.com/video/YikcGY0zA2w/video.html
I also recently uploaded my sample to this service and found it to be fascinating. My closest ancient civilization is the Danish Vikings with Franks, Celts, and Gelonian Scythians being close behind. Really interesting stuff even if it is just glorified astrology for the most part.
What do you think of the Insular Celtic hypothesis vs Gallo-Brittonic P-Celtic?
What type of analysis exactly does the free subscription provide?
Mexican American my top results were Gallo-Roman+Mayan
So what does if mean if Scottish Norwegian And Swedish Royalty is apart of my halogroup?
Amesbury sample is a beaker person from near stonehenge
Survive the Jive I think the reason he didn’t match the other ones is because they were neolithic natives rather than bell beaker invaders
I think I know this guy... arent you Jive Surivie the very indo european man?
Survive the Jive Ooo look, you’re getting brand recognition.
Survive the Jive for the Indo Europeans, Fortress of lugh for The celts, Caylan Mayo for the Germanics. The tri representers of the Indo european race. Who will rise up for the Hellenes? The italics? The Spaniards? The Slavs?
The pre indo euripean mainlander? The thracians? Hmmmmmm? ;)
Hiya Tom.
Hey on my yt channel I have a video of my true ancestry, my dad is south Italian and my mum is welsh, I saw that I got 2.7% Scythian and on my heritage dna I got 2.7% east European, so like would that be it or not, cause I was confused where the Scythian would come from
12:00 if a sample is 100% does that mean you are closest of all people to the old sample?
Have you done an updated video on your results?
As for me I'm very Celtic according to MyTrueancestry which is a bit surprising. If you were to add up the pie chart of the percentages of my matching samples it's over 75% Celt.
Deep dive pie chart is higher at over 82% Celt
Results are from MyHeritage raw data
Celt + Celtic Dobunni (6.001)
Celt + Anglo Saxon (6.141)
Celt + Briton (6.569)
Celt + Gael (6.846)
Celt (6.854)
Briton + Anglo Saxon (7.195)
Briton (7.893)
Anglo Saxon (8.053)
Celtic Dobunni (8.764)
Gael (8.985)
1. Early Medieval Pict Era Scotland Lundin Links Cemetery
550 AD - Genetic Distance: 4.844 - LUN004
My closest ancient population was Visigoth + Saxon (3.259). My closest modern population was Flemish (3.884). My ancient samples results were 14.5% Celtic and the rest various Germanic and Nordic peoples.
I did 23andMe and I came back 50.2% British & Irish, 37.3% French & German, and 12.5% Eastern European. (I realize I’m the epitome of the Amerimutt meme.)
I know I descend from English, Scottish, and German colonists and Irish, French Canadian, and Polish immigrants. I don’t know why it says I’m closest to Flemish and why Slavic ancestry doesn’t show up but other than that I quite like MyTrueAncestry.
You know there is very little difference in DNA between a Scottish or English person compared to a Dutch (Flemish) person? Likely your Gothic ancestors settled mostly in modern day Netherlands and then branched off to other countries like Britain, France, Scotland etc. I have many relatives in England, but my closest modern is a West German male. If you study the DNA between a British guy and a German guy, they are brothers.
English, and Flemish people cluster near one another. Your German, and Polish ancestry shifts you to the east of English on a PCA chart. Flemish is the mid point between English, and German. You probably don’t score any Slavic groups because you are west shifted, given that you are primarily Northwest European.
Wonder if that Celtic-Saxon Iron Age 67 BC. is somehow related to the Batavi Tribe or some other Germanic Tribes who lived along the Rhine bordering on the Gaulish Tribes...They probably all will show some Saxon relatedness...
My ancient sample breakdown was all different shades of celtic green (93%) with a tiny bit of blue viking (4%) and anglo saxon (2%).
I am from a small village in rural central Scotland, my DNA said I was 100 percent British and Irish; 46% Irish, 54% Scottish.
I also did this 2 years ago or so. It does match with my known ancestry but I also got scythian and avar which is really wierd.
It's possible you have some Hungarian ancestry then. The Hungarian plain was settled by Avars and also Scythians at different times. There were also Celts in the region during the Iron Age. Hungary was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and many Germans lived there too. Most were kicked out after WWII.
@Noah The Celt yes I am german with no known admixture. My Matches are vikings, Longboards, ostrogoths and scythian and avar.
My grandparents were from silesia.
My avar and scythian coulb be slavic idk
@@hermannarminius7757 It is. I'm as slavic as an american can get and scythian and avar were my two closest matches. Kievan Rus coming next. The scythian tribes were spread across siberia into mongolia, subjugated and pillaged ancient iran, assyria, palestine, egypt, and portions of them settled in india and were known as Iranian Huns or White Huns. Their expansion extended into people called forrest steppe people, which likely encompassed some early proto-slav/baltic. They defeated alexander the great and darius' persian empire invasions. They conquered urartu (armenia) an extremely powerful kingdom at the time. They were one of the first to use chariots in battle and during the polish lithuanian common wealth it was accepted common knowledge that polish nobility are descended from the sarmations (a scythian tribe) themselves. However, history just ignores them. Shits crazy look it up. As for the Avars, I am no expert but they were hired by romans to subjugate barbarian tribes and stop them from plundering rome. You can think of them as huns as they were asiatic in origin. The scythians were caucasian but historians noted copper or auburn hair and striking eyes.
Im irish and my closest was- Celt + Celtic Parisi (3.161) and Pict + Celt (3.604) very interesting.
My mom has 18% on her H mtDNA & has multiple crowns. Not sure what that means lol is her second biggest mtDNA
Danm bro I got Saxon Hinxton as my fifth. My 1 and 3 were both Vikings from Denmark.
What website is it you are using?
Mytrueancestry.com
i got celt and churesci most celtic stuff like Dobunni and then some germanic stuff, i guess were cousins
My mother's side is from County Limerick for as far back as we can reasonably remember and yet I only came out as 22% Celtic overall.
The proportions when I group together continental germanic groups as "Saxon" (English father) and Scandinavian groups as "Norwegian" (my largest segment from Scandinavia) it works out as roughly 50% Anglo Saxon, 30% Norwegian, 20% celt potentially because my Irish ancestors are Norman or Gallowglass.
I also checked on GEDmatch as to whether my parents are at all related to one another and the weren't (I also compared myself to my English friend and we had far more in common than both my parents) therefore I can assume it's a fairly clear 50-50 split rather than my parents also being a mix of these three groups.
On deep dive I got 64% Norwegian and the SNP lengths for them dwarf the rest which lends credence to the Gallowglass Theory.
simply put, I don't put much faith in any of these breakdown analysis. For instance, I have an analysis on Family Tree DNA. They recently revamped their ethnic analysis and completely changed my results, which before the revamp had me as like 30% South European, and now 0% south European.
Probably because you are not actually from Ireland!
@@drrd4127 unlikely, my mum gets 100% Irish on living DNA, it's probably mostly due to her being more Northern shifted than the Celtic samples on MTA due to a lack of Gaulish-like ancestry, other calculators I've made using G25 have essentially said she's predominantly Bell beaker with a bit of Germanic and no Gaulish, my dad is overwhelmingly Anglo Saxon and Gaulish/French because he's South English, I'm majority Bell Beaker/WBI on these calculators and this seems more realistic than the MTA predictions and are certainly easier to disect
According to ancestry, I'm mostly Spanish which is a very ethnically diverse country given the nonstop invasions in ancient history. It was no surprise that this website revealed that presumably the Spanish DNA that Ancestry picked up was 40% roman and 19 other people groups from the Mediterranean. The DNA from the samples collected from Europe aren't that similar to me. The most similar apparently is 1. Medieval Nabburg Germany (1350 AD) ..... 21.4 [Viking Danish] which is a surprise considering there is no Scandinavian or Germanic in my Ancient Breakdown. Despite this low similarity, I am 37% more similar to them than the other people who have used this site. My closest ancestor is 1. Cocoliztli Aztec Mexico (1545 AD) ..... 7.794 from obviously the American Samples. Despite this being quite close, I am only 1% similar when compared to other users in this site. This tells me that most people using this site are of Mexican descent! Something to keep in mind when viewing the comparisons I suppose!
I match some Minoan samples, and Hellenic travelers to Skeleton Lake.
1000 years represent about 30 generations, involving 1 072 758 784 direct ancestors (if no propinquity and incest… but we all have some).. so it's more than normal that we have VERY wide origins and pretty odd results. However, people back then was not moving as much as populations globally now do, so ancient ethno-groups was more static and retaining more specific DNA sequences (+ developing new ones along the way + propinquity and incest). Whatever how many ancestors we have, genes don't cumulate over each other over time… we always eliminate 50% of each of our parent's DNA at every generation.
As example, if both your mom and dad have 45% Greek DNA, you CAN'T be 100% Greek, but at very best (miraculously) 90%.... as you could potentially (pretty unlikely) inherit 0% of it. Following the same example, if your father's lineage miraculously transmitted all of his 45% Greek DNA on every single 5 last generations, you'd nearly be half Greek even if your nearliest 100% Greek ancestor lived 6 generations ago. Genetic is that fucked up.
I must disagree with your "theory" about genes mixing together creating "look alike something else" DNA sequences. When a DNA sequence get modified (like blue eyed mom + brown eyed dad = hazel eyed kid), geneticists can still distinguish from which "ethno-groups" it originally originate (because DNA sequences are complex and have specific markers). DNA sites analyze DNA sequences individually and are therefore able to tell the codes of each parts of them, leaving no room to "look alike something else".
European ethno-groups are fairly recent… and I'm a bit skeptic about MTA's too specific groupings (because there's use to be some variations even among small groups). However, MTA compare our DNA to specific individuals (from specific groups at specific eras)… so that's how they are able to tie people to a such specific tribes (and not to ones next to them) IF a particular individual is one of your direct ancestors.
p.s. With DNA tests they analyze only a tiny fraction of our DNA, but if understanding all of our DNA's mysteries and if analyzing it all in its totality, we'd surely receive even more wider origins.
I got celt and Cherusci. I have swarthy phenotype interesting
All the Saxon samples are from Hinxton Cambridgeshire I believe. And I think all of them have at least some celtic admixture from what I’ve read so you’re properly Celto-Germanic.
No the Hinton samples are very pure, in fact they are more Nordic than many Viking age scandinavians!
Survive the Jive Hey Tom, love your work. They are all indeed very Nordic looking especially considering how they’re supposed to be from northern Germany and Denmark. But even the most two most Nordic looking ones single population equivalent is Orkney Islanders followed by Western Norway and Iceland and the Hebrides all of which has some genetic influence from British & Irish slaves from the Viking age. Only then do you see Denmark & North Dutch in the single population equivalency. It was probably a 3 to 1 Germanic to Celtic ratio, but there was definitely some input from Iron Age British genetics (which looks almost Irish Hinxton-4) in Anglo Saxons. eurogenes.blogspot.com/2014/10/hinxton-ancient-genomes-roundup.html?m=1
Survive the Jive that’s the case why are they from 68 BC or is that a different sample entirely?
470 AD - Anglo Saxon Oakington
Genetic Distance: 6.899
67 BC - Celtic-Saxon Hinxton Iron Age
Genetic Distance: 4.022
The above are my genetic distances.
. There are striking differences in the sharing patterns of the samples, illustrated by the ratio of the number of rare alleles shared with Dutch individuals to the number shared with Spanish individuals (Fig. 2a). The middle Anglo-Saxon samples from Hinxton (HS1, HS2 and HS3) share relatively more rare variants with modern Dutch than the Iron Age samples from Hinxton (HI1 and HI2) and Linton (L). www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10408
Gratitude
For anyone that upload there dna test to this website on maps / globe on americas is accurate with your know ancestry? Also who else seeing something about a Saint Martin slave zoutsteeg ? All response is well appreciated thanks in advance ❤️🙏🏾
I have a match from your list for sure. We might have more, but i dont know if this means anything. If you really interested to find out more from my infos, let me know. But for comparison heres one deep dive deteail of mine matching with one of yours on the list i seen at 12:27. I dont share but i have the one you showing at 42:41.
Sample: SZ23
Frankish / Hungary 590 AD
mtDNA: H13a1a2 Y-DNA: R1b1a1b1a1a1c (S263/Z381)
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 16)
2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 5.94 cM
Largest chain: 112 SNPs / 3.45 cM
Culture: Longobard
Szolad, is located in present-day Hungary. There are 45 graves, all of which are dated to the middle of the sixth century based on a combination of stylistic elements of the grave goods and radiocarbon dating (2-sigma range of 412-604 AD). Archeological, stable isotope, and mtDNA (HVS-1) analyses suggested that Szolad was occupied for only 20-30 years by a migrating group of Longobard-era settlers. The female to male ratio is 0.65.
Your raw DNA is 43 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 4 - 103 SNPs
Chr. 14 - 112 SNPs
Closest Ancient:
Frank (Genetic match)
Closest Modern:
1. West_German (4.306)
2. Flemish (4.545)
3. Welsh (5.815)
4. South_Dutch (5.858)
5. Southwest_English (6.357)
6. Southeast_English (7.958)
7. North_German (8.325)
8. North_Dutch (8.326)
Similar Samples:
Visigoth Germanic Girona (550 AD) (3.386)
Bronze Age Jinonice Prague Czech (2122 BC) (3.633)
Bronze Age Prague Czech Kobylisy (1813 BC) (4.947)
Bell Beaker Scotland (2145 BC) (5.02)
Copper Age Beaker Brandysek Czech (2350 BC) (5.033)
Haplogroups:
mtDNA: H13a1a2
Y-DNA: R1b1a1b1a1a1c (S263/Z381) ISOGG 2020
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1b
MATCH! Subclade distance: 2
Clan MacMillan
Gille Chriosd
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1b
MATCH! Subclade distance: 2
Clan MacCallum
Ronald MacCaullum (1510)
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 1
Clan MacArthur
Iain MacArthur (1427)
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c2c1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 3
Clan Paden
Hugh Pethin (1611)
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 3
German Royalty
House of Wettin
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 3
Clan Wallace
William Wallace
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 3
House of Saxe-Coburg
Ernest I Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (1784-1844)
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a1
MATCH! Subclade distance: 3
English Royalty
Edward VII (1841-1910)
George V (1865-1936)
Edward VIII (1894-1972)
George VI (1895-1952)
Royal haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c2f
MATCH! Subclade distance: 2
Clan Pringle
David Pringle (1513)
Similiar Y-DNA samples
Post Medieval Plague Victim Ellwangen Germany: R1b1a1b1a1a1c
Bronze Age Netherlands: R1b1a1b1a1a1c
Etruscan Tarquinii Italy: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Early Medieval Germany Straubing-Bajuwarenstrasse: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Early Medieval Germany Straubing-Bajuwarenstrasse: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Hun Nobility Hungary Kecskemet-Mindszentidulo: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Medieval Upper Bavaria Germany: R1b1a1b1a1a1c2
Celtic Briton Gladiator York: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Celtic Briton Gladiator York: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Nordic Lombard / Winnili: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Hungarian Conqueror Karos III: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Hungarian Late Conqueror: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Germanic Tribe: R1b1a1b1a1a1-
Late Iron Age Ham Hill Fort Somerset England: R1b1a1b1a1a--
Early Iron Age Vlaardingen-Krabbeplas Netherlands: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a
Iron Age Hill Fort Fin Cop Derbyshire England: R1b1a1b1a1a--
Celtic La Tene Iron Age Bratislava Slovakia: R1b1a1b1a1a--
Late Iron Age Frisian Boy Aak Uitgeest-Dorregeest Holland: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a
Iron Age Roquepertuse Bouches-du-Rhone France: R1b1a1b1a1a--
Corded Ware Prague Obristvi: R1b1a1b1a1a--
Research Link: www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06024-4
my results
Pontic + Canaanite / Semite (5.658)
Hellenic Roman + Canaanite / Semite (6.372)
Canaanite / Semite + Hittite (9.856)
Hellenic Roman + Hittite (10.91)
Ancient Greek + Canaanite / Semite (11.2)
Hellenic Roman (12.46)
Canaanite / Semite (13.31)
Hittite (14.45)
Pontic (19.84)
Where are you from? Hittites were indo europeans.
@@dennisr4352 my parents from lebanon yes but that's linguistic mostly indo europeans indians have nothing to do with west europeans genetically etc
The site says a genetic distance of 10 and under are a definite DNA match to you.
i am very mixed so i get bigger number and being further from the ancients, i am kind of new model.
Scythian + Kievan Rus (9.505)
Viking + Scythian (10.04)
Kievan Rus (10.33)
Sarmatian + Early Slav (10.75)
Viking + Kievan Rus (11.52)
Sarmatian + Kievan Rus (11.79)
Scythian (12.23)
Viking (15.54)
Early Slav (16.75)
Are you half Caucasus mountainer?
@@germgoblin5313 I posted this a while ago, since then there have been updates and I got a lot of Ostgoth too.
I am Polish/Russian with some Jewish roots.
I got no Caucasus relatives as far as I am aware.
im from east germany, grandfathers side comes from czech (speaking german and czech)
my cloest ancient results was:
Ostrogoth + Frank (3.371)
Western Scythian + Cherusci (3.658)
Western Scythian + Frank (4.045)
Ostrogoth + Cherusci (4.322)
my closest modern was
East_German (8.288), so DNA mixed up cant even reach 5.
My ancient samples results was 20% ostrogoths
I’m sure mine is not fully accurate and most chromosomes have no matches. My closet in Europe is Roman I’m Jewish then Greek then Spain and Phoenicians. Celts are my lowest at 0.4 on the deep dive LOL
I’m related to a Mummy apparently.
Very interesting. I’ve been thinking about getting my own tests done tae see what my percentages are. All I know about my racial heritage is it’s (very) roughly 10% Cherokee, 45% Celtic, 45% Germanic. I’ll watch this all whenever I get hame.
Don’t trust your what you family tells you as if it was written in stone, my family would make me think I was 1-5% Native American and I don’t have a drop
In my case, it’s actually confirmed. My brother knows a lot more about my late father’s side of the family. Says our great grandfather on that side was Cherokee. Personally, I don’t mind either way. Those Cherokees were tribal anyway. They just didn’t have all the cool weapons the Celtic tribes had.
I met up with some distant kin about two years back and noticed many of them had Gaelic surnames from the Highlands. I thought I was mostly a Lowlander with some Irish blood. Heritage and shared genealogy can be quite surprising indeed.
Well I’m a bastard so it just so happens I do consider that possibility e’ery so often.
The natives have nothing to do with Celtic culture. Thats the "we wuz kangz" culture subversion of them due to hostile politics towards europoid conquerors. But that doesnt deligitimize that the natives have a great culture on their own merit. although i disrespect their dishonor regarding the European conquest of america, I dont hate them.
You're not "mixed" enough to be considered in "worry" territory to be thinking about a purity spiral. You are enough germanic and celt for the 10% to not matter, its 10%, who fucking cares. With that said. For those who arent majority European, they should still be proud of their culture non European culture and anything telling them otherwise ultimately want to agravate whites.. but no they arent "white". That's lying and ultimately hurts the individual as well as the Europeans who want to enjoy their cultures. It's a false truth.
Thanks for sharing your results, dont listen to others who try to profane the white race due to their own self hate of their culture, everyone has something to be proud of.
We must not forget the Hiberno-Norse population in Ireland. This could very well pull the results towards something looking Icelandic-like while the person never actually have been to Iceland....
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse-Gaels
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norse-Gaels
Our ancestral lines are very similar...Iceland, Cheddar man, Viking Gladiator, Celts....we must be related lol
They also is a lack of Irish Samples that might effect the results.
is there?
Survive the Jive I think he means on the site rather than in general
I don't know about that there are a lot of samples in their database I think some people are just disappointed in there personal admixture .... that said keep in mind how closely related all indigenous NE Europeans are .
There are very few Ancient samples from Ireland and basically all from the North. Yes.
The Irish during the Iron age cremated their remains instead of burial.
My Y-DNA haplogroup is also E-V13.
What country are you from if you don't mind me asking? I'm also E-V13, Greek Cypriot variety.
I've been pretty happy with MTA. It does fit good with my genealogy too.
I have alot of the same matches as you but at different %s.
I got viking danish + frank 3.168, viking norweigan + frank 3.194, Frank 5.612, saxon 6.246, visigoth 6.962, viking norweigan 7.986, viking danish 8.344. So ye a lot of viking 😂 it makes sense that im very frank and very viking because i tend to find lots of norman ancestors. And it makes sense that im visigoth because my 3rd great grandmother was half spanish half portuguese. I was suprised i got no celt because im scottish/irish on my dads side and on my mums side shes english but has a welsh name. But i did see some celt on the breakdown i thibk maybe like 16%
I got some Visigoth too. Gothic is the best Germanic language in my opinion shame it died out.
Viking Danish + Visigoth (3.453)
Viking + Visigoth (3.563)
Viking Danish + Frank (3.925)
Viking Danish + Saxon (4.159)
Viking + Frank (4.168)
Saxon (4.36)
Viking Danish (5.381)
Frank (6.608)
Visigoth (6.92)
Viking (7.888)
My closest ancient populations according to the site.
@@redwaldcuthberting7195 ha ha ha sorry guys you are debunking the Celtic bulshit of Irish and English markers
My DNA on this came back as 70% Celt 28% Saxon/Scandinavian 1% Sardinian 1% Basque. More EEF ancestry?
The Visigoths and franks may have had a little Celtic ancestry of their own.
Also the reason why you don’t match with the ancient British is because that mostly represents Stone Age or neolithic British not, bell beaker or indo-European influenced British, and yes the Bronze Age bell beakers in Britain seemed to have been mostly Rhineland bell beaker, with a little Spanish and French bell beaker.
Franks almost certainly have Brythonic heritage from mixing with Romanized Gauls. Much the same can be said for other Germanic groups such as Northumbrians and Lowland Scots who likely have a plethora of Brythonic blood from earlier times as well as more recent Gaelic admixtures from Éire and the Highlands.
I think that a lot of the Germanic Tribes that migrated to Southern Europe, and modern people Northern Europe Ancestry have common DNA is that they had common ancestors, rather than they a directly descended from a Lombard, or Visigoth, or whoever.
Lowland Nobleman I would’ve said garlic rather than with Brythonic as the Gauls were not Britons although the vice versa may be partially true, but yes, the Franks certainly mixed heavily with Gauls throughout the Iron and dark ages.
Robert Price very likely but there is likely sprinkling of eastern Germanic DNA throughout Western Europe as they tend to mix heavily with other Germanic royal families
It's also possible as the Visigoths ended up in Spain that some of them broke off and went to Britain as part of the Anglo-Saxon conquest.
hi interesting but i will take it with a huge grain of salt, their CEO name are hidden etc...
but as i have ancestry from the middle east i can compare with yours and i think it should not be taken too literally but in comparision with different ancesties
What the Ancient Sample Breakdown is telling you is not that YOU are 30.5% similar to a celt, but what it's telling to you is that 30.5% of your matches are celts.
You could quite very well be any of these things regardless of recent Scottish origin. Also factor in things like adoption, cheating, and other factors.
True I am 100% French according to official documents with 0 French ancestry (even west Europe)
I am from Rural Scotland. My heritage said I was 100 percent British and Irish. My True Ancestry said I was 88.34 Celtic(that includes 7.14% Pict, Ancient Britons, Ancient Irish and the Gaels from central europe), 5.75% Viking, 1.84% Anglo-Saxon, 3.88% other Germanic populations.
I would say that matches up with the 100 percent British and Irish prediction in My Heritage. Especially since I am from Rural Scotland and no one in my have ever lived in the city, it would absolutely make sense how my DNA showed up to be largely Celtic Briton and Irish-Scottish Celts with a sprinkle of Viking and Germanic tribes.
Pict+Celt was my to match.
is "Celt" Britons ? cause there's also Gauls.
I'm related to so many ancient mummies😂 and some crusaders and etc..
Cornish people are Celtic. They aren’t ethnically similar to English people. Closer to Scottish and Irish.
Dude, are you not aware that Cornish people are Celtic and close to Welsh?
www.ox.ac.uk/news/2015-03-19-who-do-you-think-you-really-are-genetic-map-british-isles For example, the Cornish are much more similar genetically to other English groups than they are to the Welsh or the Scots.
I share more in common with Cheddar Man than 95% of users! 😄
Nice, I did not get a Cheddar Man hit.
Yamnaya and farmer for me
i take it with a grain of salt it claims im connected to him but here the problem his people was wiped out 6,000 years ago by the first farmers in the British isles the only people are today closley connected to him are the Basque people though i will agree all morden brits probley has at lest 1 to 4 % of his dna
My closest Ancient populations are Hellenic Romans, Scordisci, Romans, Roman Hispanics, and Illyrians.
My top four on the Ancient Sample Breakdown pie chart, are Romans, Illyrians, Hellenic Romans, Thracians.
My Ancient deep dive populations are Illyrians, Romans, Minoans, Hellenic Romans, Scordisci, Gallo Romans, Phoenicians, Sicani, Gauls, and Pannonian Illyrians.
My closest modern populations are Tuscans, Greeks_Thessaly, Italians_Abruzzo, Albanians_Tosk, Italians_North, Sicilians_West, Kosovars, and Greeks_Central.
On an ancient population PCA chart I cluster between Late Medieval Ashkenazi Cemetery Erfurt, Early Medieval Venosa Italy, Hellenic Roman Marcellino, Roman Villa Tarragona, Roman Republic Marsiliana d’Albegna, Albania Cinamak Kukes District, Ancient Middle Hellenic Elati_Logkas Greece, Hellenic Roman, Early Medieval Dalmatia Trogir Croatia, and Crusader Knight Tuscan/ Lebanon.
I didn’t like the Y-haplogroup section. I thought it was very basic. My Y-haplogroup is R1a-Z93, yet I was disappointed that R1a was third highest. Y-haplogroup J was my second highest match, which I believe, as I know many males in my family tree had J2a as their Y-haplogroup. I was disappointed that they didn’t break down J into J1, and J2. I am also disappointed that they didn’t provide subclades for each haplogroup. R1b came in highest at around 25%, whereas as J was around 23%. I am highly skeptical of this, as I don’t know anyone in my family with this Y-haplogroup. On the Living DNA family matches only one person, out of over 1500, has R1b as their Y-haplogroup. Apart from R1a coming in at third, my Y-haplogroup pie chart resembled that of a pie chart relating to Southern Italy. I was only interested in seeing R1a-Z93 percentages, given that that is my haplogroup.
It should read Roman Hispania not Hispanics. The predictive text took over.
Visigoths are Germanic and Spanish
Celts are native Britain.
Yeah, I'm mostly Irish and it gave me 20% Celt and closest to modern day Orcadians, think it's a load of shit.
This site is added as scam online
@@ulucio86 Really? Because last month I looked it up and everyone was saying its legit. Mine added up to the MANY dna tests that I have taken. Right down to the weird and small percentages of unexpected ethinicities that are picked up across the board. My 4 children have also done this and compared it with 6 different dna companies. They all have different fathers and they all got accurate results. Yes, all of my children have different fathers.
There actually isn't a large sample size for Irish unfortunately because the Irish cremated their remains in the Iron age.
@@drrd4127 It's still a tradition from where my Grandmother came from to burn the possessions along with the body.
The interpretation is adventurous. You have clearly Vikings, Saxons and Celts as ancestors. Germanic DNA is very similar in itself. When the tribes still lived on the mainland in Central Europe, they also intermarried. Therefore, Saxons were never 100% Saxons. And so e.g. genes of Longobards, Vandals or Visigoths may have come to GB, although the tribes per se were never there. The results will be largely correct. Also the Frankish descent is not really illogical. There has always been a very active exchange between France and England.
MTA is not very informative. You in all likelihood do not posses Visigoth ancestry either. These samples all fall within the NW european cluster and naturally share a lot of recent BA specific drift with each other so you’ll match pretty much all of these samples, doesn’t really mean anything significant.
Send your raw data to eurogenes and ask for your Global 25 coordinates, costs around $12 and is far better value for money than MTA.
what is significant is that the match isn't just measuring for matching dna sequences buy giving you a percentile of how close you are related to a simple relative to everyone else. I had upwards of 4-5 matches with 99 percentile scythian, or sarmatian. What you can take away is just a very high probability of possessing said ancestry. You have to keep in mind the test accounts for Danish Viking, Swedish Viking, Norwegian Vikings, Finnic Vikings, Icelandic Vikings, Varangians by way of the Kievan Rus, essentially Russian Vikings,Viking alone, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Vandals, Thuringii, Saxons, Franks, Rugii, Longoboards etc. list goes on, and they are all from scandinavia at the end of the day. So having being in the 98th percentile for two seperated vandal samples while not matching any viking samples can indicate a closer relationship with one over the other. So it isn't just picking a location and turning the clock back and being provided with a fake ancestry etc.
I was adopted from Poland and my closest ancestral populations are Avar + Kievan Rus'(3.551)
Viking + Kievan Rus'(3.664)
Viking + Avar (4.172)
Viking + Scythian (5.48)
Avar (6.149)
Scythian + Avar (6.318)
Kievan Rus'(6.77)
Viking (8.009)
Scythian( 13.06)
Early Slav(15.73)
My modern is Polish(3.944)
Belarusian (5.169)
Estonian_Polish (5.619)
Estonian (5.930)
Ukrainian (6.164)
South_Polish( 6.440)
Russian_Smolensk(6.831)
Southwest Russian (7.202)
SW gang. synthetic anglo like Michael Fassbender .
that was a jk btw
PS take that website with a pinch of salt.
Never trust someone with such a silly name as “Fassbender”. Sounds like some kind of drug they do in California.
@@lowlandnobleman6746 Take out the F and you get assbender.
My closest Ancient population is Byzantine ,Romans, Samnites ,Illiryans and Hellenic Romans..(im greek)..
Oh Bronze age,,Ancient Middle Hellenic Elati-Logkas Greece 🤷♀️
My 23andme results were as I expected 90% British, Irish and Scot. 10% German and Scandinavian. My MTA results are so different I'm baffled. Mainly Viking, Longobard and Alemanni not even a mention of Celt, but the weirdest is the matching samples my 3rd nearest match was Scythian... wtf??
It's a terribly built website but very interesting none the less, even if it's only for an interesting pub conversation.
23andme does only recent ancestry
it doesn't do ancient ancestry
it gives no clues to ancient ancestry like MyTrueAncestry
@@fomalhauto Precisely!
HA HA HA , that is true , you guys in brithis isles are nor Celtic tribes , there is some people they they are but they usually match the Iberian in DNA, it has been proved you are not from alpine stock of people
if you go around with your DNA in ancient calculators you will find out that is true you people from the British isles must match Iberian markers to be from Celtic alpine , Balkan culture tribes
By what you just said it sounds like your ancestors are the recent invaders to the British isles Roman, Anglo-saxon ect....🤣😂🤣😂
given how long the human species has been around and how many migrations have taken place, it's hard for me as an ancient history nut to believe that we're not all extremely diverse, descendants of 20+ people groups in most cases.
Interesting I am half British and Half Scottish and I am EV-13 also .
Half Scottish is also half British.
@@CuFhoirthe88 If you are referring Genetically yes, but culturally no it"s not the same .
@@robnurse1522 I'm Scottish. We are British. In every sense. Tool.
@@CuFhoirthe88 Not culturally we are not try using your brain and less with the insults .
@@robnurse1522 I'll insult any r-ard to my heart's content. Employ your own brain sometime and you'll realise Scots literally are British. And we cannot help but be so We are natives of this island.
You have the conception of one whose ancestors moved over to America - you're using British as synonymous with English like a tool. In that case I accept we may be blood bonded but don't pretend you're exactly the same as those of us who stayed to live and breath this land.
The devil's Bible show you how language changed over time. I think this lugh characters name was pronounced like the ancient way being An el because G used to be pronounced like a N.
You're applying things you believe to be true about a Latin manuscript from Czechia to Celtic languages.
"G used to be pronounced like a N" When and where. The G in Lugus has always been a plosive sound in Celtic languages until it was silent in the Lugh form.
Had me up until the weird pronunciation of pagan. Then I could only focus on that. 🤦🏻♀️
Youre Y haplogroup at mytrueancestry is nearly exacly what i got... its VERY unacurrate
Do they give haplogroups in MyTrue Ancestry?
@@sr2291 They give you the haplogroup which they expect, which is inaccurate as hell. Its 0% precise
@@cowlo9990 Where? I only see percentages of the male and female haplogroups in your autosomal DNA. Not yours.
@@sr2291 Thats probably what i mean
@@cowlo9990 Yes but that largest section is not your haplogroup so how are the results 0% accurate? My haplogroup is only 5% of my total DNA sample. I got it on 23andme and other sites. I have the numbers.
Scythian, Avar, Kievan Rus, and Ostrogoth were my results. It was cool that my closest match was Scythian as I've always been very fascinated with them. I always knew genetically they were connected to the slavs but the categorization by linguistical barriers dismmissed a connection.
Scythian were different from slavs just some border sharing in some parts and avars were also different from slavs. Scythian and avar were turkic groups while slavs especially eastern slavs lived next to turks and took many things from them starting from Scythian and hun period ending with golden horde and tatars
It’s ok bit weird lol
Amesbury Wiltshire near Stonehenge.. A Bell beaker Briton. Norse Gaels, Iceland, Western Ireland & Western Isles Scotland.. same as me. Anglo Saxons lived on the East coast, The Fenns East Coast of England. I live in ENGLAND, English Celt. Paternal Irish Scots, Maternal Dutch, Frank Saxon covers Dutch. Not British X Briton please, you are getting confused with the culture lable. English Jutes Angles, Celts Welsh Scots Irish.
British is just a National Flag term not a Culture.
The British userped the English seal and Culture in 1688 which is lead by the Constitution, of 1215..King John.
...before that we were a mixture of Angles Dutch German Saxon, Jutes Scandanaavian Danish, Flanders (Belgium). Romans out of Canterbury Kent England.. I am serious about this..Because there is a great mixture of ancient cultures, when Great Britain was invaded..My ancesters, England came from Bedfordshire & Cambridge on both sides of my Family in Pre dna evidence 16/17/18/19 /20th centuries.. so it is accurate taken from RAW data.
The Irish were PAGAN's before Christianity, the DRUIDS still function as a group today..
I am related by DNA to the O'Neils, Lords of Ireland, who were Vikings with red hair..
Norse Gaels from the Scottish Hebrides.. Names like McAfee origins from Colonsay inner hebridian Isle which correlates with my ancient Paternal ancestry.
Welsh & Cornish same dna Celts.
On ancestry I'm 100% Irish, very tight match geographically with my family tree (6 gen on both sides) within Ireland too. I have almost the same results as yourself, lots of matches to the bronze age samples/ beaker/ Iceland etc. I've a GD of only 3.6 from the Golden boy and share about 5 cM too. I have a feeling most people of Irish/Scot English/Cornish/Welsh decent will land somewhere similar. I also matched very close with almost all the gladiators!
What about the yamnaya tribe
Saxon + Frank (1.912)
Celt + Frank (2.576)
Briton + Frank (2.978)
Viking Danish + Frank (3.261)
Viking Danish + Saxon (3.519)
Saxon (3.983)
Viking Danish (4.719)
Frank (6.388)
Briton (6.438)
Celt (6.482)
I don't think that you understand this subject at all lol
IF they use another calculators and compare the dots they will see the true results