@@zeketopanaga2530 the stakes were higher in 2016 but i think the calls themselves were that little bit worse on anzac day. 2016 gf was horrific though
3:07 I’m a saints fan and i was so angry when they didn’t call holding the ball, but then I lost my shit when they called holding the ball when they tackled us and called 50
Literally 3 correct decisions by the umpire, does not at all belong in this video. (1) Clarke clearly gets a foot to it - not HTB, (2) Hill takes 5 steps and then is run down, clear prior and a clear HTB, (3) Butler aggressively motions and yells at umpire, clear 50 for dissent. An extremely unlucky passage for Saints but perfect umpiring. The Clarke play on call was particularly fantastic by the ump.
Agree with D C here, even if it wasn't touched off the boot it would've been tough to distinguish whether it did or did not. Umpires should always play the lesser if not sure therefore it's the correct call.
That's like the only one here that is correct, as per what D C said. To add though, if you go frame by frame by pressing the > key, you can see clearly that clark absolutely does kick the ball before it hits the ground.
Theres a general rule If its Adelaide Vs Hawthorn there will be at least 40 Adelaide sooks claiming they were robbed. There you go i fixed your comment for you
@@marmz69 as a general rule, for every comment on the internet, there's someone who replies with an statement which is the exact opposite and thinks they are right. What if you and wyowyo are both wrong? what if I'm wrong?
I know it's probably karma cause we won a game off of an incorrect call against Brisbane but I think it was a 2021 game against Sydney where Jeremy Cameron marked a ball right in front of goals with seconds left in the game (would've been a winning shot at goal) and the umpire decided it wasn't 15m when it had gone atleast 20, not the most outrageous call but it changed the result of a game
Yep, it was definitely karma for the Zac Bailey non call on Blicavs the week prior. And I’m a die hard Cats man. That was bad juju and we got screwed like Brisbane did.
It wasn’t right in front of the goal, it was right behind the behind post. Would’ve been after the siren and without being allowed to run off ur line, would’ve been a really difficult shot at goal.
Nice to hear Geelong fans who actually acknowledge that was the wrong call lol I’m a Lions fan who lives in Geelong and I felt gaslit by my entire town that week
I know you should play to the whistle, but if every player on both teams have stopped because they're expecting a free to be paid, you've probably missed a free kick.
You already negated your argument with the first part of your comment. You acknowledge that players should play to the whistle, full stop. End of story
This could be a weekly Instalment as the umps outdo themselves every week. & the funniest thing about it all is that they declare the decisions were correct after the games, how do they even take themselves seriously let alone expect fans to take them seriously.
@Sean O'Connell it just gets better & better (NOT); I actually think it's not all their fault, the afl are the ones telling them they're doing a good job
The biggest ever howler was Ablett vs Isacc Smith. Smith is standing there doing nothing, Ablett runs up to him bumps him, and then trips over his laces and falls over. Umpire gives a free for prohitited contact to ablett.
And yet the afl constantly protects them, even after all the disaster decisions that they have made on purpose!...it's beyond ridiculous and they're just on a power trip now!
alright i umpire footy and this is based on the current rules (so could be different depending on the time it was): 0:00 Correct decision, bombed it forward blindly, no teammate there. Insufficient intent to keep the ball in. 0:35 Wrong decision, skill error. 1:05 Correctly disposed of the ball, must've been so loud the players couldn't hear "play on handball". 1:18 Wrong decision, incorrect disposal. Edit: after further review a kick was made by Stephenson, correct decision. 1:31 Missed high contact call, turns into incorrect PIB decision. 1:54 yeah im not gonna comment on that one.. both calls incorrect 2:19 Wrong decision, should be a mark. 3:04 Tough to tell, I think he might've gotten a foot on it (always better to pay the lesser), turns into correct HTB decision, into correct 50m penalty 3:25 Strike to the guts is prohibited contact, whether it was a strike or not is hard to tell because of the TV angle. 3:39 Incorrect decision, sufficient pressure in order to rush the behind.
Thats the only one i would argue is actually right. The rule is if a player kicks the ball out of bounds without a teammate within 15 metres of the ball it’s considered deliberate. Its only now they have cracked down. Back when it was called it wasnt so much known.
@Not KimJong-un You have to put it in the context of the era it happened in. They absolutely NEVER paid free kicks like that back when this happened. It was only when it was blatantly obvious that the player was trying to get the ball out of play that they paid a free kick. This decision was not remotely consistent with what was happening at the time. So no, it wasn't there.
Astatine (At) is the rarest naturally occurring element on Earth, with an estimated total amount in the crust of less than 1 ounce (28 grams). It is a member of the halogen group, and is chemically similar to iodine. Astatine is a highly radioactive element, with a half-life of only 8.1 hours. This means that half of any given sample of astatine will decay into another element in 8.1 hours. Astatine was first discovered in 1940 by a team of scientists at the University of California, Berkeley. They were bombarding bismuth with alpha particles, and they observed a new element being produced. Astatine was named after the Greek word for "unstable." Astatine is a solid at room temperature, and it has a melting point of 302 degrees Celsius and a boiling point of 337 degrees Celsius. It is a black or grayish-black solid, and it has a metallic luster. Astatine is a very toxic element, and it is easily absorbed through the skin. Astatine has no known practical uses. It is too rare and too radioactive to be used in any commercial applications. However, it has been studied for possible use in cancer therapy. Astatine-211, a radioactive isotope of astatine, has been shown to be effective in killing cancer cells. However, the use of astatine-211 is limited by its short half-life. Astatine is a fascinating element, but it is also a very dangerous one. It is the rarest naturally occurring element on Earth, and it is too radioactive to be used in any practical applications. However, its study may lead to new and innovative cancer therapies. Here are some additional facts about astatine: Astatine is a non-metal. Astatine is the heaviest of the halogens. Astatine is a highly radioactive element. Astatine has a short half-life. Astatine is a very toxic element. Astatine has no known practical uses. Astatine has been studied for possible use in cancer therapy.
You’ve missed the worst call ever from about 15 years ago, Essendon vs Fremantle. Matthew Carr for Fremantle kicked toward goal but it went for a behind but Carr got dumped after he kicked the ball. The main umpire runs out and tells the other umpire to ask the player whether he wants to take the kick again, so the second umpire asked………..the offending Essendon player, who then kindly declined the offer. 😂 Several Fremantle players tried to tell the umpire he’d asked the wrong player but he wouldn’t change his decision.
You can add the holding the ball paid to Powell-Pepper against Scholl in the Showdown last Saturday night. P-P was standing 1m behind Scholl after Scholl had taken a good mark in deep defence. P-P wasn’t required to clear the area and stayed 1m behind Scholl. The the maggot then called play on as Scholl went to kick normally from behind the mark, P-P grabbed him and the maggot paid HTB to everybody’s disbelief.
@@troyjackson9743 Powell Pepper still tackled him before the play on call, if you watch it back the umpire is signalling the mark when Powell Pepper tackles him and we all know you have to wait until the umpire says play on before you can tackle. also sholl took what 1 step to kick? is it play on as soon as you go to kick? that would mean every shot on goal is automatically play on
@@troyjackson9743 SPP was in the protected area when he tackled Scholl. He was going to play on, but SPP tackled him too early. Realistically, that's a 50 metre penalty.
Some bad calls but to Matt Stevic credit at the 3:10 mark, Freo against Saints, if you slow it down you can see a small kick by the Freo player which is considered a disposal which makes play on the correct call.
I was supporting Bulldogs and turned off the TV early in the second quarter because the umpires were so blatantly biased agianst the Swans. It appears the umpires were instructed by the AFL to ensure the Bulldogs won that game.
At 3:08 Jordan Clark got a very slight kick on the ball, and the decision is thus technically correct. I personally would have penalised him anyway, but if you want to split hairs, the decision was correct.
i will say, the carlton vs brisbane game this year was one of the worst ive ever seen. carlton did an amazing tackle which was clearly holding the ball and i lost my shit when they called it brisbanes free kick. everyone did! not to mention the carlton vs north or the carlton vs bulldogs this year too. absoulutely terrible, i hope i dont see umpire number 4 ever again
It was NEVER paid like that back when this actually happened. Absolutely never. Players would do this (and even worse) all the time and get away with it in that era. Why do you think the commentators were carrying so much?
Not surprised Ray Ray features. He loves drawing attention to himself with marginal and odd calls. The one against Hill after a Freo player was tackled was a classic dud call from a very good umpire. Some of the others defy logic TBH. Still, makes for great viewing and fills papers when they make bad calls.
If that bulldogs hawks games from about 3 years back, where the umps handed the dogs the game in the last 2 minutes with 3 of the worst umpiring decisions of all time, isn't in this list, the list is wrong.
Amazing they don't have the stolen game from Fremantle vs Carlton a couple years ago it was a great kick from the boundary but it shouldn't have been a kick since it didn't land in the field of play
The worst part is that these kind of decisions happen every week. AFL umpires are the worst officials in any sport in the world, and it’s not even close
There’s a reason. AFL is one of the hardest, if not the MOST hardest, sports in the world to umpire. Every decision has to be called in a split second, there’s no time to think unlike sports like cricket. Umpires are human, and humans make mistakes. For every mistake they make they get 100 right, in fact we should be praising them as no one else in the world can umpire a game like this and cop the abuse they receive. Don’t like my answer? Then try being an umpire yourself, it’s not as easy as you think it is. Even in Junior footy.
Between 1970 and 2020 Hawthorn had more free kicks against than for in every season bar 2015…and you still had numpties going “free kick Hawthorn#😡!!! Never let the facts get in the way of jealousy😉!!!
No, they didn't pay deliberate like that back when this happened. Just be cause they would now, the interpretation the umpires use has completely changed. In the context of the time, no it wasn't a good call.
Why call it descent, such arrogance, umpires are becoming more and more superior over time like, dare I say a super race. The players make game entertaining, the umpires need to do their job. Bring in umpires override from clear vision when needed It may slow the game but I’d rather it be fair than fast
@@gwilkes5325 He tried to legally dispose of the ball. "18.6.3 Free Kicks - Holding the Ball: Incorrect Disposal Where a Player in Possession of the Football has not had Prior Opportunity, a field Umpire shall award a Free Kick if that Player elects to Incorrectly Dispose of the football when Legally Tackled. For the avoidance of doubt, a Player does not elect to Incorrectly Dispose of the football when: (a) the Player genuinely attempts to Correctly Dispose of the football; (b) the Legal Tackle causes the football to be dislodged from the Player’s possession."
@@jebbersceb he had prior opportunity though so genuine attempt is not a thing if he had prior. The only thing I can think of is that the ump thought the freo guy got a little bit of boot to ball
I love AFL but these kind of calls make it so hard to watch the game. They are all just so awful. The deliberate out of bounds when kicking at goal is still the funniest thing in the world.
@@jayden6047 the dissent was paid against mcdonald, if you see on the left, he walks over to the left, arms out screaming at the umpire, it was the correct call
as a neutral i can confidently say that anzac day 2019 is the worst umpired game in afl history
100%.. still gets me going
2016 grand final is worse
@@zeketopanaga2530 the stakes were higher in 2016 but i think the calls themselves were that little bit worse on anzac day. 2016 gf was horrific though
Bombers were given the game on a platter and still blew it
@@Adam-dm1se ok buddy 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
3:07 I’m a saints fan and i was so angry when they didn’t call holding the ball, but then I lost my shit when they called holding the ball when they tackled us and called 50
This is the most embarrassing one for me. Cringe umpire triples down in absolute arrogance.
Literally 3 correct decisions by the umpire, does not at all belong in this video. (1) Clarke clearly gets a foot to it - not HTB, (2) Hill takes 5 steps and then is run down, clear prior and a clear HTB, (3) Butler aggressively motions and yells at umpire, clear 50 for dissent. An extremely unlucky passage for Saints but perfect umpiring. The Clarke play on call was particularly fantastic by the ump.
Agree with D C here, even if it wasn't touched off the boot it would've been tough to distinguish whether it did or did not. Umpires should always play the lesser if not sure therefore it's the correct call.
Ah well, Saints beat Freo this year and the dockers still haven't recovered from it lol. Looking like a bottom 4 side rn
That's like the only one here that is correct, as per what D C said.
To add though, if you go frame by frame by pressing the > key, you can see clearly that clark absolutely does kick the ball before it hits the ground.
There's a general rule: if it's adelaide vs hawthorn, there has to be at least 40 free kicks for the hawks
Theres a general rule If its Adelaide Vs Hawthorn there will be at least 40 Adelaide sooks claiming they were robbed. There you go i fixed your comment for you
@@marmz69 as a general rule, for every comment on the internet, there's someone who replies with an statement which is the exact opposite and thinks they are right. What if you and wyowyo are both wrong? what if I'm wrong?
I know it's probably karma cause we won a game off of an incorrect call against Brisbane but I think it was a 2021 game against Sydney where Jeremy Cameron marked a ball right in front of goals with seconds left in the game (would've been a winning shot at goal) and the umpire decided it wasn't 15m when it had gone atleast 20, not the most outrageous call but it changed the result of a game
Yep, it was definitely karma for the Zac Bailey non call on Blicavs the week prior.
And I’m a die hard Cats man. That was bad juju and we got screwed like Brisbane did.
It wasn’t right in front of the goal, it was right behind the behind post. Would’ve been after the siren and without being allowed to run off ur line, would’ve been a really difficult shot at goal.
Nice to hear Geelong fans who actually acknowledge that was the wrong call lol I’m a Lions fan who lives in Geelong and I felt gaslit by my entire town that week
Three guarantees in life:
- Death
- Taxes
- Umpires robbing crom
-death
-taxes
-collingwood losing the 2023 grand final cause cox flopped and djd not get a free kick (just a little prediction)
@@bentheswitchsportsfan06bulldogs supporter but hmmmmm…
I know you should play to the whistle, but if every player on both teams have stopped because they're expecting a free to be paid, you've probably missed a free kick.
You already negated your argument with the first part of your comment. You acknowledge that players should play to the whistle, full stop. End of story
Yesterday's North v Carlton Good Friday game is worth a whole video.
so true, north lost because of the umps. as a carlton supporter, i felt bad for them
north back to reality
This could be a weekly Instalment as the umps outdo themselves every week. & the funniest thing about it all is that they declare the decisions were correct after the games, how do they even take themselves seriously let alone expect fans to take them seriously.
Did u watch the port Sydney game yesterday? Fuckn shocking
@Sean O'Connell it just gets better & better (NOT); I actually think it's not all their fault, the afl are the ones telling them they're doing a good job
@@adstaxman7877 yeah because they all get a pat on the back after every game and give each other brownie points…
The biggest ever howler was Ablett vs Isacc Smith. Smith is standing there doing nothing, Ablett runs up to him bumps him, and then trips over his laces and falls over. Umpire gives a free for prohitited contact to ablett.
That James Kelly deliberate lives in my head rent free
And yet the afl constantly protects them, even after all the disaster decisions that they have made on purpose!...it's beyond ridiculous and they're just on a power trip now!
I tell you what the hawks in their day were absolutely blessed with umpiring calls, sometimes I forget how bad the #freekickhawthorn era really was
BOY OH BOY WOWEE
That Crows v Hawks game gave me an aneurysm when I was watching it, so many bad calls the video could just be an upload of the whole game
I was at that game in the first clip and the camera angle doesn't do it justice. That turned sharper than Warnies best leggy.
As a bomber fan I will never forget that Anzac Day game
alright i umpire footy and this is based on the current rules (so could be different depending on the time it was):
0:00 Correct decision, bombed it forward blindly, no teammate there. Insufficient intent to keep the ball in.
0:35 Wrong decision, skill error.
1:05 Correctly disposed of the ball, must've been so loud the players couldn't hear "play on handball".
1:18 Wrong decision, incorrect disposal. Edit: after further review a kick was made by Stephenson, correct decision.
1:31 Missed high contact call, turns into incorrect PIB decision.
1:54 yeah im not gonna comment on that one.. both calls incorrect
2:19 Wrong decision, should be a mark.
3:04 Tough to tell, I think he might've gotten a foot on it (always better to pay the lesser), turns into correct HTB decision, into correct 50m penalty
3:25 Strike to the guts is prohibited contact, whether it was a strike or not is hard to tell because of the TV angle.
3:39 Incorrect decision, sufficient pressure in order to rush the behind.
Not only was that first one not deliberate, you could've given 50 for a late push in the back.
not 50.. but a down the field free kick yes
Thats the only one i would argue is actually right. The rule is if a player kicks the ball out of bounds without a teammate within 15 metres of the ball it’s considered deliberate. Its only now they have cracked down. Back when it was called it wasnt so much known.
@Not KimJong-un You have to put it in the context of the era it happened in. They absolutely NEVER paid free kicks like that back when this happened. It was only when it was blatantly obvious that the player was trying to get the ball out of play that they paid a free kick. This decision was not remotely consistent with what was happening at the time. So no, it wasn't there.
Any Geelong game at Geelong or Collingwood at MCG you will know will be one side
You mean just any fucking Geelong game yeh? I swear they even expect frees for no reason.
I gotta admit, holding the ball rule has improved heaps this year.
surprised the last 30 seconds of the 2014 prelim port vs hawthorn isn't in here.
i have to admire the thumbnail. whoever made it is very skilled
"Free Kick Hawthorn": The Movie
Yess my team song at the end 😊😊
4:04 - I was 10m away from the Malceski and the ump screaming obscenities as loudly and profanely as I could. 😂
Astatine (At) is the rarest naturally occurring element on Earth, with an estimated total amount in the crust of less than 1 ounce (28 grams). It is a member of the halogen group, and is chemically similar to iodine. Astatine is a highly radioactive element, with a half-life of only 8.1 hours. This means that half of any given sample of astatine will decay into another element in 8.1 hours.
Astatine was first discovered in 1940 by a team of scientists at the University of California, Berkeley. They were bombarding bismuth with alpha particles, and they observed a new element being produced. Astatine was named after the Greek word for "unstable."
Astatine is a solid at room temperature, and it has a melting point of 302 degrees Celsius and a boiling point of 337 degrees Celsius. It is a black or grayish-black solid, and it has a metallic luster. Astatine is a very toxic element, and it is easily absorbed through the skin.
Astatine has no known practical uses. It is too rare and too radioactive to be used in any commercial applications. However, it has been studied for possible use in cancer therapy. Astatine-211, a radioactive isotope of astatine, has been shown to be effective in killing cancer cells. However, the use of astatine-211 is limited by its short half-life.
Astatine is a fascinating element, but it is also a very dangerous one. It is the rarest naturally occurring element on Earth, and it is too radioactive to be used in any practical applications. However, its study may lead to new and innovative cancer therapies.
Here are some additional facts about astatine:
Astatine is a non-metal.
Astatine is the heaviest of the halogens.
Astatine is a highly radioactive element.
Astatine has a short half-life.
Astatine is a very toxic element.
Astatine has no known practical uses.
Astatine has been studied for possible use in cancer therapy.
You’ve missed the worst call ever from about 15 years ago, Essendon vs Fremantle. Matthew Carr for Fremantle kicked toward goal but it went for a behind but Carr got dumped after he kicked the ball. The main umpire runs out and tells the other umpire to ask the player whether he wants to take the kick again, so the second umpire asked………..the offending Essendon player, who then kindly declined the offer. 😂 Several Fremantle players tried to tell the umpire he’d asked the wrong player but he wouldn’t change his decision.
every second call of the essendon vs gws 2023 game
You can add the holding the ball paid to Powell-Pepper against Scholl in the Showdown last Saturday night. P-P was standing 1m behind Scholl after Scholl had taken a good mark in deep defence. P-P wasn’t required to clear the area and stayed 1m behind Scholl. The the maggot then called play on as Scholl went to kick normally from behind the mark, P-P grabbed him and the maggot paid HTB to everybody’s disbelief.
His opponent was there. Thats why he was standing there and he played on. Learn the rules.
@@troyjackson9743 Powell Pepper still tackled him before the play on call, if you watch it back the umpire is signalling the mark when Powell Pepper tackles him and we all know you have to wait until the umpire says play on before you can tackle.
also sholl took what 1 step to kick? is it play on as soon as you go to kick? that would mean every shot on goal is automatically play on
@@troyjackson9743 SPP was in the protected area when he tackled Scholl. He was going to play on, but SPP tackled him too early. Realistically, that's a 50 metre penalty.
@@daniilmedvedev3647 he was in the protected area because he was standing right next to his opponent. Scholl stepped off his line so spp tackles him.
lets be real .. that Geelong kick towards the boundary was deliberate! #FREE KICK HAWTHORN
the outro song is the best park of the video
The first one is clean even the commentator
3:06 worst umpiring i’ve ever seen wtf
I swear I’ve never heard someone say that a good call to the refs 😂😂
Some bad calls but to Matt Stevic credit at the 3:10 mark, Freo against Saints, if you slow it down you can see a small kick by the Freo player which is considered a disposal which makes play on the correct call.
that first one wld be called deliberate nowadays but back then that was the worst possible call
clark kicked it so fair call
Now not a single commentator has the balls to call out an umpire
I know right thank you! They dont wanna lose their jobs that’s why they don’t say anything?
Bloody oath!!
Expect for BT
BT literally said "THAT umpire cannot make THAT call"
The introduction of legalised gambling obviously introduces the temptation of corruption.
the worst part about this, is it happens every weekend
Nothing goes past 2016 GF for me
tell us who you go for without telling us who you go for
2017 GF went close.
Not a Sydney fan but Bulldogs got the ride of their life the whole finals series.
I was supporting Bulldogs and turned off the TV early in the second quarter because the umpires were so blatantly biased agianst the Swans.
It appears the umpires were instructed by the AFL to ensure the Bulldogs won that game.
At 3:08 Jordan Clark got a very slight kick on the ball, and the decision is thus technically correct. I personally would have penalised him anyway, but if you want to split hairs, the decision was correct.
i will say, the carlton vs brisbane game this year was one of the worst ive ever seen. carlton did an amazing tackle which was clearly holding the ball and i lost my shit when they called it brisbanes free kick. everyone did! not to mention the carlton vs north or the carlton vs bulldogs this year too. absoulutely terrible, i hope i dont see umpire number 4 ever again
No surprise seeing the hawks getting soft kicks. Surprised that there's not a stack going to Geelong and Sydney.
Umpires: once the maggots in white; now the grubs in green
There used to be an umpire called John Russo, who I thought was a bad
We need some sort of camera or go pro on umpires so we can see why they even paid the decision
@3:09 it touched oldmates foot and spun a lil sideways
No other sport in the world has umpiring this bad and it just gets progressively worse
You get Grey Hairs watching this!
Ngl we seriously need VAR in footy where some people can overturn umpire calls if they've gone for the wrong choice.
no surprise hawks getting free kicks
lol that first one was deliberate
It was NEVER paid like that back when this actually happened. Absolutely never. Players would do this (and even worse) all the time and get away with it in that era. Why do you think the commentators were carrying so much?
some of these make me wanna punch my screen even tho i dont go for any of these teams
that first one would get paid nowadays no problem
Not back then though. You have to judge it in the context of when it happened.
Not surprised Ray Ray features. He loves drawing attention to himself with marginal and odd calls. The one against Hill after a Freo player was tackled was a classic dud call from a very good umpire. Some of the others defy logic TBH. Still, makes for great viewing and fills papers when they make bad calls.
If that bulldogs hawks games from about 3 years back, where the umps handed the dogs the game in the last 2 minutes with 3 of the worst umpiring decisions of all time, isn't in this list, the list is wrong.
You watch some of these clips and have to think the game is rigged
missed the biggest one, maynard being blocked in the grand final
In Perth, Channel 7 have over the years replayed Sheed kicking the winning goal, making sure not to include vision of Rioli blocking Maynard.
Well the Hawks definitely had the umpire's in there pocket🤔
The deliberate out of bounds is the worst rule in the AFL...
Although the melbourne carlton was a practice match it was such a bad call crippa ducked so hard should have been holding the ball
Amazing they don't have the stolen game from Fremantle vs Carlton a couple years ago it was a great kick from the boundary but it shouldn't have been a kick since it didn't land in the field of play
STANDDDD!!
And they wonder why we call them maggots
BT, l concur WOW WEE.
Is it just me or does that jerky footage make ya feel like your about to go imto an epileptic fit?
0:46 How the hell is that deliberate?
The worst part is that these kind of decisions happen every week. AFL umpires are the worst officials in any sport in the world, and it’s not even close
There’s a reason. AFL is one of the hardest, if not the MOST hardest, sports in the world to umpire. Every decision has to be called in a split second, there’s no time to think unlike sports like cricket. Umpires are human, and humans make mistakes. For every mistake they make they get 100 right, in fact we should be praising them as no one else in the world can umpire a game like this and cop the abuse they receive. Don’t like my answer? Then try being an umpire yourself, it’s not as easy as you think it is. Even in Junior footy.
@@phantomboi909 I’ve played, umpired and watched afl for 20 years. I think I know what I’m talking about bud
This was clearly #freekickhawthorn era
2:00 the 50 was against another player, not Petracca.
Poor Petracca .. cops it from the umpire, and then from big Maxy.
And we wonder why the game hasnt been adopted by other countries 😅
there's one hashtag to sum up the majority of this video and it's #freekickHawthorn
I'd happily pay a player big money to deck Stevic.
Funny but the more umps on the ground, the worse it seems to get
If u want good pay and be crap at your job be a umpire.
I love hearing people winge about umpires... Here's a thought... Grab a whistle and get out there!
Between 1970 and 2020 Hawthorn had more free kicks against than for in every season bar 2015…and you still had numpties going “free kick Hawthorn#😡!!! Never let the facts get in the way of jealousy😉!!!
And yet Hawks won at least one flag every decade since their first in 1961. Which means theyre due for one by 2030.
Someone doesn’t like hawthorn
The umpires really need to look up the word "deliberate" in a dictionary.
More often than not they get it completely arse about.
2:00 is the correct decision. Why is it on here?
Petracca one was the worst. Thats the furthest thing from descent. He literally tensed his fists
From memory I think it turned out the dissent part was another Melb player, not Petracca.
Yeah I realised that after the video, if you look closely you’ll see Tom McDonald with his arms out
When it comes to bad umpiring, you know it will be dominated by Chamberalin. And the AFL gives him a Grand Final gig.
Fukn green dawwgggs!!!
something tells me this guy doesnt like the hawks
All I can say is... Free kick Hawthorn! 😂
alle ai kan saay iss yu carnt sperl ither
@@hawkers94 soz bruz
OMGFG THE DUMB UMPI push the back at 1:40 thats not a push to the back !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not a fan of either team but this whole video could have just been that Anzac Day game. Got to be the worst game of all time
1:57 what the fuck was the 50 for?
Melbourne #25 Tom McDonald in the background giving the umpire an earful
Yet the wankers are never held accountable
Well they are. They have performance reviews and can get dropped to lower leagues if they stuff up too bad/often
Cry harder champ. Professional footballers miss shots from the goal square sometimes. Do you want to see them get dropped for one shocking mistake?
wtf !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i just saw !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That first one is actually a very good call.
No, they didn't pay deliberate like that back when this happened. Just be cause they would now, the interpretation the umpires use has completely changed. In the context of the time, no it wasn't a good call.
Why call it descent, such arrogance, umpires are becoming more and more superior over time like, dare I say a super race. The players make game entertaining, the umpires need to do their job. Bring in umpires override from clear vision when needed
It may slow the game but I’d rather it be fair than fast
The first one was right and so was the non holding the ball and then the holding the ball in the saints dockers game @3:07
How was it not holding the ball, genuine question (I’m a dockers fan btw)
@@gwilkes5325 He tried to legally dispose of the ball.
"18.6.3 Free Kicks - Holding the Ball: Incorrect Disposal
Where a Player in Possession of the Football has not had Prior Opportunity, a field
Umpire shall award a Free Kick if that Player elects to Incorrectly Dispose of the football
when Legally Tackled.
For the avoidance of doubt, a Player does not elect to Incorrectly Dispose of the
football when:
(a) the Player genuinely attempts to Correctly Dispose of the football;
(b) the Legal Tackle causes the football to be dislodged from the Player’s possession."
@@jebbersceb makes sense
@@jebbersceb He had prior opportunity and more time than Hill.
@@jebbersceb he had prior opportunity though so genuine attempt is not a thing if he had prior. The only thing I can think of is that the ump thought the freo guy got a little bit of boot to ball
Every decision ticked off by AFL. Show dissent and you're banned.
I love AFL but these kind of calls make it so hard to watch the game. They are all just so awful. The deliberate out of bounds when kicking at goal is still the funniest thing in the world.
Almost as bad as Gary lions comments
Watching these get me annoyed again
where's 2018 gf?
The Cripps 50m was fair enough. All clubs were informed several times about the "dissent" rule. I don't like it but that was the rule.
How? He wasn't even looking at the umpire?
@@jayden6047 he said something. I know it's a sh*t rule and it should go
@@sebastianliggieri8411 he was def talking to himself I reckon
@@jayden6047 the dissent was paid against mcdonald, if you see on the left, he walks over to the left, arms out screaming at the umpire, it was the correct call