Examining the claims of Lex Meyer, Hebrew Roots teacher
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 07. 2024
- Hebrew Roots teacher Lex Meyer offers a pretty solid teaching about Gnosticism and Marcion in one of his videos. But then, in the middle of the teaching, he throws in a couple surprising claims. One about the Lord’s Prayer, the other about Jesus and the Law. Let's examine them.
LINKS FROM VIDEO
Meyer's full video “Gnosticism and its Influence on Christianity”
• Gnosticism and its inf...
Check out the Codex Sinaiticus mentioned in this video:
codexsinaiticus.org/en/
Our video "Hebrew Roots and the Priesthood"
• The change Jesus broug...
DONATE TO OUR MINISTRY
TheBiblicalRoots.org/#donate (Thank you!)
OUR LINKS
linktr.ee/rlsolberg
CHAPTERS
00:00 - Open
01:02 - About these false teachings
02:21 - The Lord’s Prayer: did Marcion mutilate it?
05:46 - Problems with the King James (KJV) translation
07:45 - Jesus and the Law
09:03 - Jesus set us free from the God of the OT?!
09:45 - God and the Mosaic Law are two separate things
11:11 - Sin is lawlessness, right?
12:23 - 1 John 3: Sin is not defined as disobeying the Law of Moses
14:52 - How do Christians fulfill the law under the New Covenant?
Hey brother, I appreciate your critique and feedback about my video. I actually agree with much of what you said. That was an old video, and I have changed my view on some of those things since then. So, I think I should probably take that video down and make an updated version of it. I really do appreciate your critique. Blessings to you brother.
Thanks, Lex! I appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment. And I certainly understand what you mean about views changing and evolving. I think we all go through that. At least I _hope_ we all do! If we're not growing and learning in our understanding of God and Scripture, then we must think we already know everything, and that's a scary place to be.
Blessings,
Rob
Much respect to anyone who can respond like you did. Two brothers dedicated to the truth and we need more of that. Good job
Lex why would you throw pearls to the Dogs, this Amalekites take the of Israel at the back if the guy say he is Xtian let him be Xtian they are sons of Edom the Scriptures give us detail on this you can’t pray for an Amalekite is game over they are just around to test with their staggering wine they have drank
Just me again Rob. This is brilliant. Great respect shown. I'm a watcher of Lexs content. I love his content and has explained so much for a dummy like me. But great respect shown by you both. All done with Love. Looking forward to learning from your content. God bless.
Respect for this reply 👍🏼
I am exceedingly happy to have found this channel. I ordered your book. Can't wait to read! Glory to God for He is good!
As a former Torah observer, I can attest, Lex Meyers is a good guy. Hopefully he returns to the truth someday.
Kathryn D
Thank you so much. I came out of the Hebrew Roots movement on December 23rd, 2021. When after walking with Christ since a young woman I was yet deceived. I have begun to mister to women in the movement and to those being tempted by it’s subtle beauty and false light. I greatly appreciate the work God is doing in you not only to defend the Gospel but also equip those of us with few resources to turn to as we minister to those around us falling prey to this belief system. It is rapidly growing in Oklahoma (and I’m sure many other states).
Thank you for sharing that, Kathryn. I love that you are using your own experience to help others! God is so good.
Blessings, Rob
Shalom! Can you explain why if the law is not eternal, there are so many of them that say " do this through out all your generations, forever." And also, why did Jesus say, "I come not to do away with the law but to fulfill it." And why do most Christians seem to think 9 of the 10 commandments are still valid. I am not at all trying to be rude by the way, I am only curious to how you feel about these things. Toda!
Shalom, Twiggz! You're not being rude at all. That's a valid question. I'll give you a short answer now, but I've got a video series starting in a couple weeks that will go into much greater detail.
I believe there is an unchanging, eternal Law of God that is grounded in His moral perfection and holiness. And the principles contained in this Law never change. However, the way God _expresses_ His principles can and does change between different expressions. So the changes we see between the Law of Moses and the New Covenant amount to a change of expression rather than a change of principle.
For example, one of God's unchanging principles is that blood atones for sin (Lev 17:11). Under the Law of Moses, that principle was expressed in the continual animal sacrifices. Under the New Covenant, it was expressed much differently-in Christ's sacrifice on the cross "once for all" (Heb 10:10). So Christians today still have a sacrifice just as the Law of God requires. But ours was an eternal sacrifice made by Jesus that covered all our sins forever.
Blessings, Rob
You make some good points.😊
Hebrews 10:26-31
26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
I've watched a a lot of Lex's videos so this is really interesting to me.
And thank you for helping the truth to be told.
Thanks, Mike. I haven't seen many of his teachings yet.
Thanks for clearing it up, specially that now a days were living in times of a lot of confusion.
Mr. Solberg, all of your videos that I've seen so far have captions. This one does not. Are you able to enable captions? It would be good for our brothers and sisters in Christ who are Deaf.
Thanks, Michael. Yes, we're working our way through the older videos and adding captions there, as well. I'll make sure this one gets covered.
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots Let me know if I can help.
Thank you for contending for the faith 🙏🏼
Interesting video! I think as far as praying the Lord’s Prayer-God knows in our heart who we are praying to! I don’t believe we can accidentally pray to Satan! Our Heavenly Father knows our intent.. I’m binge watching your videos! Thank you so much for speaking out about the Hebrew roots movement!❤️🙏✝️
Thanks so much, Dee! Blessings, Rob
God bless you thank you for taking the time to expose his errors
Shalom
Thank you, David!
Awesome! Thank you! 🙏
HRM is sowing Tares in the body of Christ and should be avoided! How dare them criticize the prayer 🙏🏻 our Lord gave us!!
It is the translation that was being criticized not the prayer.
The Foundation of Augustinian-Calvinism by Ken Wilson is an excellent resource about Gnosticism's influence on Christianity.
You answered my question thank you.
This is interesting stuff. Thank you. I am leaning towards Messianic, but I love learning new things.
Thanks, Corey!
You should watch "The Door" of no greater joy ministry and the sin of observing the law of Moses.
I am a new fan of your channel 🙏🏼 thank you for sharing
Thanks, Jonathan!
Lol...earth is flat...but love your teachings.
I agree mostly, but as a cradle Catholic, I was taught and in addition, Jesus told us to follow the commandments. Not all the laws of the Hebrews, but the 10 commandments in addition to what you mentioned. I can't remember the passage where Jesus stated such though, so forgive me.
Great video Rob! Thanks so much for your work in exposing false teachings! I really enjoy your kind and fair disposition when addressing the issues and the way you stay away from ad hominems. ❤️🥰
11:11 - So it seems to me (if I'm understanding this correctly) that Meyer's argument is, first a non-sequitur (if you are not obeying the Law of Moses, then you are lawless), which means he's assuming what he has made no effort to prove (regarding the term "law") and finally, reveals he is equivocating on the meaning of the term "law", which - unless I'm in error, would be 3 logical fallacies in about as many seconds! His claims also imply that anyone who does not accept the Hebrew Roots view, is advocating FOR lawlessness. Which is a claim that probably leaves just about everyone scratching their heads, because, who teaches lawlessness from the pulpit? What denomination is that? I've gotten the "lots of preachers preach it" claim a few times, but never an example or name. I for one, don't know who that would be. (Steven Furtick maybe? EGAD!) And while Meyer may have changed his views... I know that not all the folks who subscribe to Hebrew Roots have done the same. Unlearn the Lies was in error? We'll we've all been there to some degree or another. And when we discover we are, may God grant us the humility to admit rather than double-down or try to give excuses. We all know how hard swallowing our pride can be!
The video, "Historical & Biblical Evidence for Perfect Preservation of Scripture (OT / NT Hebrew / Greek / KJV)" on youtube really helped me understand the bible version issue.
Thanks
I agreed with Lex on the 1st point, King james is the correct definitive version.Older manuscripts does not mean it is more accurate. It could be doctored.
Also becareful of your words, like Lex say .ignorance is an excuse but still suffer the same consequence.
Mr Solberg
Next time you critique another channels video please leave a link to that video in the notes it’s the responsible thing to do.
Hey, Kevin! The link to Lex's video is there in the description.
@@TheBiblicalRoots my bad I did not see it
So in Mathew 24:20. Is it command that we not violate the Sabbath day law? A prophecy from Jesus... why would He say this if its not counted in the first great commandment?
Hey Mike! In Matt24:20, Jesus is warning his listeners about a great tribulation that will happen in the future. He says, "then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let the one who is on the housetop not go down to take what is in his house, and let the one who is in the field not turn back to take his cloak. And alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a Sabbath" (Matt 24:16-20). He's talking about a great destruction that will come upon the people suddenly and they will have to flee. There will be no time to grab spare clothes, they will need to immediately run to the mountains. And if it happens in winter or on a Sabbath day, Jesus warns, it's going to make traveling to safety that much more difficult!
So there's no command to keep a Sabbath here. However, there is a clear assumption that people will still be keeping the Sabbath when the destruction comes. Which makes perfect sense, since the Sabbath was never forbidden or prohibited.
Blessings, Rob
excellent !
Matthew 6: 9-13 NIV
OUR Father IN HEAVEN
hallowed be your name,
your kingdom come,
YOUR WILL BE DONE
ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our debts
as we also have forgiven our debtors
And lead us not into temptation
but deliver us FROM THE EVIL ONE.
** What's up with Lex only reading the NIV Lord's Prayer in Luke....but not the NIV Lord's prayer in Matthew?
Codex sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text. The KJV was written from the Antioch text. One can be traced directly to the apostles, the other can't.
I also read once that the current Pope wants to change The Lord's Prayer because he doesn't like the end. He doesn't like how it says 'lead us not into temptation. '
I'm not sure how true that is though. Lol
Wow, I haven't heard that. That would be scary if it's true!
Great video brother Ron, love the example of Adam and Eve being innocent of breaking the law of Moses, if that is what you find lawlessness.
The only problem is, is that the Laws of Moses did not exist at the time Adam and Eve were alive. So not a good example.
@@Flagrum3 Well...except that was my whole point in the video. :-) The Law of Moses did not exist at the time of Adam and Eve. So if 1 John 3 defines "sin" as "breaking the Law of Moses" (as Lex Meyer believes), it would mean that Adam and Eve did not sin. And we all know that isn't the case!
Thanks,. Earl!
@@TheBiblicalRoots Hahaha, sorry I don't know how I missed that. I'm getting old. Forgive me.
@@Flagrum3 Haha! No worries. You’re keeping me on my toes.
Rob, if it's not sin to eat pork, why Jesus cast legion to 2000 swine knowing they will die and be wasted instead be eaten by his believers, and why peter said he never eaten pork long after Jesus resurrection?
The Mosaic Law hasn't been nullified in its entirety. The moral law, _i.e._ the Decalogue, is still very much in play. Jesus Christ Himself said as much, as well as the Apostle Paul. So, the New Covenant's Law of Christ includes aspects of the Law of Moses. The moral law is a representation of God's unchanging moral character. To negate the moral law is to say that God has changed His morality, which denies the traditional Christian idea of the Triune God as being immutable and perfect.
You crushed it, Rob! Exceptional logic and crystal clear Biblical interpretation, as always. Keep it up!! 👍
1 Corinthians 11:14
Yushke was a Mamzur ‘
These people always tend to give more power to satan and demons and other false gods actually. Like every word or letter could be the devil and that's how they get you believing their claims. Im honestly so tired of all of them.
There seems to be a lot of flat earthers involved in the HRM.
I've noticed that, too, Diane. Not every HRM-er, but a much higher percentage than the average population.
@@TheBiblicalRoots
Hi! I am new to your channel and appreciate your addressing these issues. I am not HR, but I do interpret Genesis as history and believe it. I believe with the Psalmist (148:4) that there is waters above the firmament. I believe the lights are with in the firmamentI even believe the moon is a light! I don't believe I am standing on a moving, spinning orbiting surface. I don't believe water curves around and sticks to a ball. Are my beliefs unbiblical? Am I suppose to accept theories as truth and what I see on TV as proof?
My friend (HRM) used to be a flat earther but no longer is. In this case, I wish they went hand-in-hand. But maybe they do ultimately because he is now well past “standard” HRM and now not only rejects Paul but is also questioning the idea of the Father, Son, and Spirit all referred to as Yahweh in Scripture (can’t use the concept descriptive T- word in these places :-)). As soon as you start to question that, Christ is the first to lose His eternal deity.
@@miketisdale7341 absolutely. I’m grateful some do make it back to trusting Christ and regaining a belief in the Gospel after experiencing no relief or peace from the heavy burdens that results from the HRM path. Praying that’ll happen for a loved one 💕🙏🏽
His critique……..!?!??
Professor self-reflection is well polished!
Like your critiques about the Tanakh……..you still see you!
Great video! Just one thought... I think there is a problem with definitions here. Everyone keeps referring to it as "the law of Moses" but it isn't... It's God's Law. And He is our High Priest under the order of Melchizedek which existed long before Moses.
So the priesthood existed before Moses. (At least since Abraham likely before)
The Sabbath existed before Moses. (Since creation)
The clean vs unclean animal distinction exists before Moses. (Noah)
It's almost like maybe people knew these things because God walked with them... And then after exile in Egypt God had to reintroduce Himself through Moses.
Interesting how there was 400 years in Egypt, and then 400 years of silence between the old testament and the new. Seems like God had to reintroduce Himself to us again.
Seems like we might wanna pay attention lest we be caught blind deaf and naked.
Thanks, Charity! I refer to it as the "Law of Moses" because that is the term that Scripture consistently uses to refer to the commands that Yahweh gave Israel at Mount Sinai through Moses (Josh 8:31-32, 23:6; Judges 4:11; 1 Kings 2:3; 2 Kings 23:35; 2 Chron 23:18, 30:16; Ezra 3:2, 7:6, Neh 8:1; Dan 9:13; Luke 2:22, 24:44; John 7:23; Acts 13:39, 15:5, 28:23; 1 Cor 9:9; Heb 10:28).
Blessings, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots yes I guess I should have clarified, this term is also used in scripture. I don't have a problem with the term, I just think that our view of it is skewed. We hear "law of Moses" and ascribe it to him like he made up these laws. But he didn't, they came from God.
I appreciate your response, but you really didn't address the bulk of my comment.
thank you everyone wants to refer to it as Moses law instead of whos law it really is and just glances over or leaves out the forever part.
@@richardkerns1709 Leviticus 16:30-34
30 For on this day shall atonement be made for you to cleanse you. You shall be clean before the LORD from all your sins. 31 It is a Sabbath of solemn rest to you, and you shall afflict yourselves; it is a statute FOREVER. 32 And the priest who is anointed and consecrated as priest in his father's place shall make atonement, wearing the holy linen garments. 33 He shall make atonement for the holy sanctuary, and he shall make atonement for the tent of meeting and for the altar, and he shall make atonement for the priests and for all the people of the assembly. 34 And this shall be a statute FOREVER for you, that atonement may be made for the people of Israel once in the year because of all their sins.” And Aaron did as the LORD commanded Moses.
Leaving aside the various uses in the OT of “h5769. עוֹלָם ‘ôlâm” (go search every single one, many/most times not used in the fullest since of the English word we translate it to), do you accept Christ’s atonement for your sins once and for all? If you profess Yeshua as your Lord and Savior, and are consistent with yourself believing that “forever“ here in Lev 16 means FOREVER, then you cannot accept His atonement for your sins per the Torah. Christ is not of the tribe of Levi nor of the house of Aaron, and of course that would be a change. So the pressing question still is, do you accept Yeshua’s atonement for your sins?
But the earth is flat so you lost me there. However, I would say that anyone praying that NIV version would be praying to his father - for a christian that would be God in heaven, but for a deceptive person pretending to be a christian and praying right next to you that would be whoever his father might be.
So he is partly correct.
Very clear explanation.
Thanks, Clara!
I want to call out you're affirmation that the "siniaticus" is a solid truth. It may be, but there is evidence that it may not be. Hence, Putting it forth as factual or authentic is rather careless, and not a thing that Jesus will appreciate.
Thanks for the call out, TOS! I'm not sure what you mean that the CS "may not be a solid truth." Are you suggesting it's a forgery? Or an errant copy of the Bible? Or something else? I'm not aware of any evidence of such. But if you have some, to share I'm all ears.
@@TheBiblicalRoots Thanks for your kind reply, you never know, these days, what you're going to get back when you leave a comment.
There is a dispute, as I'm sure you're aware, as to the authenticity of the manuscript, and the reliability of Tischendorfs account of how he came to find it. Although IT, and his account of it, have been accepted by the institutions concerned, institutions that have much to lose if they are wrong on this, I nevertheless think there is enough doubt as to render a question mark. Check it out, if you seek you will find. 🧸
@@IbecomeU Thanks, TOS! I am familiar with some of the controversy surrounding how Tischendorf ultimately got the manuscript out of the monastery where he found it. And it's also been noted that the CS varies from the King James in several instances (the KJV being essentially the only available translation in use in the 1800s.) But personally. I've not come to doubt the authenticity of the dating or the translation of the CS. In fact, it seems possible that the discovery of the CS may reveal some of the shortcomings of the KJV. But I'm not a trained expert in this particular area. I only know enough to read from trained experts and try to learn from them. :-)
Shalom! Rob
Rob, you really need to read Deuteronomy 4:1-40 and see for yourself that God gave the Law's forever. And not only till Jesus came.
Hey, Shannah! Where does Deut 4 say that the Law of Moses was going to last forever?
Deu 5 2 refutes that the law is forever by making it clear the patriarchs before Moses didn’t have the same covenant, in the Dead Sea scrolls we can see clear evidence that no man kept the sabbath before Moses.
@@JGez83 The Dead Sea Scrolls actually show us evidence that people kept the Sabbath before Moses. Read Jubilees for example, the 6th most common book found among the Dead Sea Scrolls
@@jaron5333 Jubilees Ch 2 vs 31
And the Creator of all things blessed it,>>>>>>> but he did not sanctify all peoples and nations to keep Sabbath thereon, but Israel alone
I burst out laughing when I heard the statement about the Lord's Prayer in Luke. It's a laughably bad explanation. It's called a textual variant.
So all sin comes from the breaking of the law? No, my friends, sin is disobedience to GOD and with that definition, Adam and Eve did sin before there was the law.
Some people love to twist the words of the bible to change to say it is saying other than what it is saying. They will say does it mean what it is saying, or is it saying something else.
For example: does it mean this generation will not pass away will not till all is fulfilled.
Most think it is our generation and not the one Jesus is speaking to. Jesus did the cross in the generation of the disciples, not ours. He said it is finished in that generation.
has the earth passed away also ?
@@richardkerns1709 heaven and earth was the temple where God dwelt in sanctuary. You are thinking about the heaven earth you see outside. The heaven and earth was in the holy of hollies in where they made atonements for their sins. That has passed. We are no longer under that covenant of in the heaven and earth in that sense. We are in spiritual kingdom where God rules if you know and trust in Jesus.
No such thing as heaven and earth being in the Temple.
"it is not lawless for a Christian to eat pork!? What about to eat snake?
“He said to them, “Are you so foolish? Don’t you understand that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him?” Mark 7:18
When Messiah comes in flaming fire he is going to destroy those eating swine's flesh, rats and the abomination (shrimp, oysters, lobster, etc.). I wouldn't do it nor would I encourage others to do the very thing that is going to bring their destruction. Isaiah 66
The good thing about CZcams you turn it off, a specially when hearing a load of twisted crap.
That's a little harsh, Karl. I may disagree with some of Lex's teachings, but I would not classify them as a load of twisted crap. ;-)
R.
Rob, Lex claims his church Grafted Church in Yukon, OK is a non-denominational Christian church. On the website : "We do OUR BEST to love God and love our neighbors." Hmm...Is the Christian religion about " doing our best"? Nope. "And we are a community of believers who follow Yeshua ( Jesus) and love God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength." Hmmm.....in my church's Sunday morning and evening worship services we confess as a congregation that we have NOT loved God as we should.
It's true that the Christian faith isn't about "doing our best". From my understanding, it's in large part acknowledging the fact that we have erred from good and condemned ourselves through sin, and that is why we need a savior in Christ Jesus who suffered and died on the cross to atone not just for our sins, but the sins of the world so that all who believe in him might be saved. The website statement that they do their best seems to imply that they are aware that they'll never BE the best at loving God or our neighbors (hence why we need Jesus Christ our savior), but still strive to improve for the sake of showing faith in Christ Jesus through works of love.
"in my church's Sunday morning and evening worship services we confess as a congregation that we have NOT loved God as we should."
Again, this is why we should do our best to love God and our neighbors. If you think that that's wrong, does your church proceed to say "Yes, we confess we're not loving God as we should but since the faith isn't about doing our best to do so, we're just going to call it a day"? I certainly hope not. I believe the first statement that Lex and his church do their best to love God and our neighbors feeds into the second one where they say they love God with all of their heart, soul, mind, and strength. Lex is not someone who believes that he's already at that perfect level and I've seen him admit in a video or two that he is (for lack of a better word) flawed, which is why we should all try to understand the texts so that we might follow Christ Jesus and God in Heaven by extension.
LEX is very wrong on a few things and he puts out a massive amount of vids. Thats a bad combination ...... .........
I think an even worse false teaching by Lex Meyer is this: "When Jesus says you must be born again of the spirit, he's not talking about your soul being born again but your fleshly body being transformed into a spiritual body." ~ Interview with Rob Skiba about his book 'Immortal'
This man teaches false teaching. This is heresy. That is not what Jesus teaches us about salvation and being born again. If he gets the fundamentals of salvation wrong, then I can't trust him on anything else.
torah (second, perfect covenant rejecting believing) followers can't and don't have an answer to John 8:36. It makes Matthew 5:17-18 well clear and is proven by Hebrews 10:9-10 along with the ultimate confirmation in Ephesians 2:8-19. IT IS FINISHED!! We are ELEUTHEROS!!!
Thanks, Daniel
@@TheBiblicalRoots This is the problem with all these sub religious cults, the followers very rarely apply 1 John 4:1, ans they certainly aren't John 4:24. This is why we must search out the scriptures as Paul said, to see if the things people speak are so. Love your work Rob, GOD bless you
Sorry,bt You are doing the same work as Lex, tearting Gnostic (the trinity is also fals, Jesus was the son of Joseph)..Marcion was condemned be the church as heresy, you agree on that I think?
Marcionism was an early Christian dualistic belief system that originated with the teachings of Marcion of Sinope in Rome around the year 144. making a lot of fals changes to the translation he and Theodotion made from Hebrew to Greek.
Marcion is call "the son of satan" be Polycarp.
Marcion did not believe Jesus was Messiah, so creating the modified genealogy suited him well. For our current genealogy in Matt destroys this 2 ways: it cuts off Joseph as father of Jesus, and hence Jesus is not from the David line. (therefor Jesus is not from the line of David, and He can therefor NOT be the true Messiah, as per this scrip has been falsified dy Marcion.) Second, it added Jechoniah whom Jeremiah cursed as no heir of his would sit on the trone of David, ending Jesus as a Dvidic Messiah altogether....
The Problem you both have is: trying to make Saul fit with the word of Jesus....follow Jesus, and not "the one that come after me, in he's own name,"
Jesus told us, look up rev 2:2 .... was talking about all of Asia that Paul complain to 2 Tim "they have all left me" becoz they have all rejected Saul....so should we also!
I really like this channel but the part of saying that the KJV manuscripts have stuff added is not true. It is the other manuscripts that erased those verses. God is not going to hide from his church the more accurate words of scripture for 1500 years of church history. He preserves his word down through church history amongst his people. But look at when those other manuscripts came to light: right now down our time when deception is the norm. They came in at the same time as the pretrib rapture, mormons, JWs, 7th day adventists, and the modern tongues movement. Being dated earlier in and of itself means nothing. You can find counterfeit money older than money that exists today. God is not going to allow his word to fall away from his people for 3/4 of church history.
Sorry but no new Covenant has come as when it comes Israel and Judah will be reunited and no one will teach anyone to know Hashem. Jesus did not condense the commandments into 2 saying the law is Love G-d and Love your neighbor was taught long before Jesus the Torah is G-ds teachings on loving each other and him. Also Paul was not an apostle he never knew Yeshua and his teachings do not line up with what's in the tanak.
Thanks for watching and commenting, Micah! Just to make sure I understand where you're coming from, you do not accept the New Testament as Scripture, correct?
What i find baffling is your dismissal of all of the instructions in the OT. If you break one of The Ten Commandments, you sin. YESHUA even expounded on the Ten Commandments during the Sermin on the Mount. YESHUA didnt take 614 down to two, that would be absurd,. Lying isn't a sin, sir? Coveting either?
Aside from that, the NT was not written in Greek. YESHUA spoke Hebrew to HIS apostles, Paul didn't speak nor write Greek.
Your interpretation of what YESHUA said about washing hands into "you can eat anything" must be your love of pork. YESHUA did not say eat anything. Peter had a dream about eating unclean animals and he was horrified. YESHUA did not di away with eating Kosher, or Peter would not have reacted the way he did. YHWH is not a liar. HE never changes. ABBA said those foods were unclean, period. Try turkey bacon.
Love your teachings but the NIV is bad news. The older versions have Jusus lying to his brothers stating that he will not go up to the feast. John chapter 7..Then he goes. The word 'yet" has been removed. Acts 8:37 is removed completely. The ethepion eunuch does not need to "believe with all his heart" to be baptized....the 3 that bear witness is changed...etc. etc. Not that Lex is right but if you check out the scholarship of many translations you will find that are heretics.. .Eugene Nada etc.
John chapter 7
Lex is Not a Brother In Christ
Hey, Sal! I hear what you’re saying. But, Lex confesses faith in Christ and I take him at his word, even if I disagree with his theology.
You are doing a great job. I have listen to some of Lex's work. He is a Torah Keeper and false teacher. God say Torah Keepers are Cursed if they miss one and this Guy teaches Torah Keeping. He is teaching the false gospel spoken of in the Book of Galatians. Peace and Blessing to you, my Brother In Christ
@@TheBiblicalRoots I'm glad you're not flat-out condemning him like I've seen with so many other criticism videos (and not just against Lex, but I've seen quite a few videos where someone with a different interpretation labels another individual as a heretic/false teacher/liar/etc.), but rather try to offer helpful insight and still view him as a friend in Christ.
1 - 28 - 22
Lex Meyer is a
Seventh day Adventist and acts like he's not by calling his church
"" Grafted church ""
@@porfiriojohn5276 I am NOT a SDA, and never have been. I was raised in the Church of the Nazarene, and studied theology at Southern Nazarene University. About ten years ago the Holy Spirit opened my eyes to the Sabbath and Feasts, and it has been a blessing in my life to keep them. I do not identify as Hebrew Roots either, and simply think of myself as a Christian who is trying to be as Biblical as I can be.
Romans 8 7
Says the flesh is hostile to God for it is not subject to the law of God. The word submit can also be translated as obey see the greek for this.
1 john 5
For this is the love of God that we keep his comandments we should love God .this comes from the old testament .law = instructions see torah in hebrew..
adam and eve did violate the instruction of eating forbidden fruit .jesus is the high preist of the melchizedek preist not levitical .and hebrews says it was a transfer of the law not a change or abolishing. transfered to a everlasting preisthood .and your idea of a new covenant is lacking full context read jerimiah 31 31. You shall not have to teach your neighbor to know the Lord for all will know the Lord .this is still in our future. For all to know the lord is prophecy about the day of the Lord. All of these statements is a bigger converstation that sound bite verses cannot explain for your postion or mine .God does not change or make mistakes
Shalom
Thanks, Jeff.
You said, _"Hebrews says it was a transfer of the law, not a change or abolishing. Transferred to an everlasting priesthood."_
But Hebrews says, "For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a *change* in the law as well" (Heb 7:12). In fact, the word "transfer" does not appear anywhere in the book of Hebrews. I'm curious where you got this idea of a transfer rather than a change? Maybe I'm missing something.
You also said, _"God does not change or make mistakes,"_ to which I can respond with a hearty "amen!"
Shalom
Rob
Oy Vey RL, you give me a headache.
Personally I think you your taking the Micheal, I wouldn't Scribe to your video. I don't agree with you at all.
The earth is flat -read your bible
The Bible is not a science textbook, nor does it claim to be. It's a book of theology that teaches us about God.
Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots no contest. The truth is always true. Science constantly changing. Trust the science ( man ) what deception. The last few years should have taught everyone that. Got Torah Got Truth
Lex Myers isnt a Hebrew Roots teacher, lol.
It's this type of shallow research and misrepresentation that you're using for the purpose of distorting God's Word.
RL your very mislead but you’ve got a hot wife “ 👍👍
RL I can tell you were born Jewish’
Hi Richard! Actually, HaShem determined that I should be a Gentile.