Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Changing Face of London, 1960

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 17. 07. 2012
  • This film focuses on the clearance of bomb damaged buildings following World War II and the projects and plans to rebuild the capital. The role of the London County Council (LCC), the architects department, its development plan and planning processes all feature. It makes the point that a lot of new development will be high rise and that Londoners will be 'looking up' to see new buildings. New commercial office buildings and the restoration of Wren designed churches in the square mile both feature along with the area around St Paul's Cathedral. New materials and construction techniques are covered, particularly the use of steel, glass and concrete. Models of Elephant and Castle and Crystal Palace Sports Centre are shown along with 'Motopia', an unrealized scheme. New school and college buildings are shown along with housing programs.
    Date: 1960
    Reference No: GLC/DG/PRB/11/015/001
    Collection: Greater London Council
    This film is part of the collections at London Metropolitan Archives, a public research centre which specialises in the history of London. If you haven't visited an archive before, it's a little bit like a library but with one key difference; the majority of items in an archive are unique, handwritten documents which cannot be seen anywhere else.
    We care for and provide access to the historical archives of businesses, schools, hospitals, charities and all manner of other organisations from the London area. With 100 km of books, maps, photographs, films and documents dating back to 1067 in our strong rooms, we're proud to provide access to one of the finest city archives in the world - you could call it the memory of London.
    This channel provides highlights from our film and video collections and films which we have created. Find out more at www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/lma and explore our film clips, photographs, maps and prints of London at www.londonpicturearchive.org.uk

Komentáře • 22

  • @Derwent03
    @Derwent03 Před 4 lety +25

    " The citizens of tomorrow want the past of their Grandfather's swept away"
    Oh those foreward thinking boffins of the '60's. This 'citizen of tomorrow' would much rather still have old Euston Station, The Corn Exchange and The Imperial Institute to name just 3.

  • @ronaldcollins7839
    @ronaldcollins7839 Před 7 lety +12

    I work with both Stanley Marks and Len Waldorf whilst at Movietonews as a junior cameraman
    in the sixties in fact Len Waldorf was one of my mentors whom I learnt a lot from,
    Stanley Marks on the other hand was a brilliant film editor who left Movietone shortly after I arrived
    to form his company called New Decade Films,
    Stanleys first commission was to make a documentary for the Central Office of Information
    called "The Changing Face of London"

  • @samsmith7044
    @samsmith7044 Před 5 lety +20

    Very sad I don't think the new buildings they replaced the old with look better at all they look cheap and ugly and has ruined the history of London I think the real reason they did it was because they couldn't be bothered and couldn't afford to restore london after the war

  • @jonlaban4272
    @jonlaban4272 Před 2 lety +3

    The City Planners Dream

  • @johnmcloughlin5275
    @johnmcloughlin5275 Před 3 lety +8

    13:15 they said its largely for the young that it's designed for and they will have more places to play today it's not even safe for children to play on the streets or playgrounds in london then he goes onto say about how they owe it to our children I'm sorry but every generation after the war has failed to give better to their children and destroying London like this was the biggest betrayal to them children possible

    • @highpath4776
      @highpath4776 Před rokem

      This part of London didnt really have the terraced houses with the back alleys for playing in, it was a slight improvement, see present Golden Lane Estate and Finsbury Health Centre Area for how it worked out which was not too bad. The new buildings though did not consider though the insulation properties , and used loads of asbestos panelling which was cheap, but dangerous to maintain.

  • @chrissyboy2401
    @chrissyboy2401 Před rokem +2

    Replacing Victorian,Edwardian ( yes slums that needed to be made habitable) sometimes beautiful architecture with gloomy,depressing glass covered high rise office buildings etc stole the soul of London,but hey ho progress etc

  • @barleyarrish
    @barleyarrish Před 4 lety +13

    this film should be renamed 'fall and decline', preparing a great trading and technological nation in preparation for absortion into the European Superstate to it's new role as a dumping ground with dwindling service industry's, a vassel state of europe, who won ww2?.

  • @johngrindrod
    @johngrindrod Před 11 lety +2

    Hi, this video seems to be only available in this playlist. Any chance of making it available on here in its own right?

  • @FontedaPipaPortugueseFarmLife

    The city of London is not even in England, it is separate entity with its own laws, but a square mile that rules England

  • @AbstractMan23
    @AbstractMan23 Před 8 lety

    Anyone know the road at the end at 17:20?

  • @Glitches59.
    @Glitches59. Před 2 lety +6

    Modern and brutalist architecture 🤮

  • @TheMelamia
    @TheMelamia Před 3 lety +8

    Can we just agree to knock down everything built in the 60s and 70s? So hideous!

    • @peroquetoiseau933
      @peroquetoiseau933 Před 3 lety +4

      Init I think they weren't bothered to maintain the historical British buildings built before so they quickly made cheap ones that now are not aging nicely

    • @highpath4776
      @highpath4776 Před rokem +2

      SOME 1960s (And 70s) buildings do have an elegance and useful service. Others were poorly built and have not aged for usefulness over 50years. Some should not have been built in the first place

  • @shiroy4102
    @shiroy4102 Před 3 lety

    yo la miff

  • @manjulaadappa6128
    @manjulaadappa6128 Před 3 lety

    It's clear Londoners are not in favour of royalty....why then, are the royals holding on to it?! They don't need it.......makes me wonder ...they can get into the hospitality business....like in India......

  • @GypsyHunter232UK
    @GypsyHunter232UK Před rokem +4

    COME HOME JACK THE RIPPER ALL IS FORGIVEN..