What is Deconstruction? Jacques Derrida
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 04. 2020
- What is Deconstruction? Jacques Derrida
I prepared and delivered this lecture on Derrida for one of my courses during the spring of 2020. This is an edited version of my lecture on deconstruction.
In this video, I explain the basic philosophy of Jacques Derrida and his own explanation of Deconstruction. Included also is a reference to Derrida's critique of Jean-Jacques Rosseau in his book "Of Grammatology."
Further Reading:
Derrida. "Of Grammatology." amzn.to/2BzldO1
If you like my educational videos, please take my Udemy courses:
Literary Theory: www.udemy.com/course/literary...
Postmodernism: www.udemy.com/course/postmode...
Postcolonialism: www.udemy.com/course/postcolo...
-------------------------
My Website: postcolonial.net
My Recording Gear:
Camera (Logitech C922): amzn.to/2Ko6syK
Mic (Blue Yeti USB Mic): amzn.to/2QjVfmT
Lights (Selfie Ring): amzn.to/2XbOSDu
Computer (Apple iMac): amzn.to/2TFKcWH
------------------------------
Donate to help us keep offering free educational content: streamlabs.com/rajam6
-----------------------------
Please Subscribe to this channel: / @masoodraja
-----------------------------
Disclosure:
Postcolonial Space sometimes displays merchant affiliate links in the video descriptions. We only generate revenue after someone clicks on a link and makes a purchase/ performs an action on the resulting page!
#Derrida #Deconstruction #LitTheory
such a wonderful lecture!! got cleared a lot of major points that were confusing me.
Thank you.
Your videos gives a great insight to the context! ✨
Thank you!
Truly said
Thanks.
Excellent sir ,amazing!
Thank you.
Thankyou sir. You are truly doing a great job. More power to you. Could you plz give a lecture on Paul de man's Resistance to theory
Thank you. Sorry, I don’t think I have a deeper expertise on Paul de Man. If I every feel comfortable of my grasp of his work, I will try to record a video on it.
This is good!
Thank you.
I love you so much!
Thank you, Eve!!
Can the literary theories like postcolonialism or feminism be considered as deconstructive since they aim at subverting the traditional binaries of the dominant colonist vs the colonized or men vs women? However, in subverting the conventional hierarchies are they not re-establishing a dominant 'center', a notion which Derrida argued against? From the postcolonial lens 'the colonized' may be the new center but isn't it still a 'center' nonetheless? Similarly, Freud challenged the hierarchal position of 'the conscious' but then he made 'the unconscious' the center. Kindly clear this confusion.
Thank you. Some use deconstruction but the term and it’s usage is very specific and for that I recommend a careful reading of Derrida. You may want to watch my discussion of Derrida’s chapter on Plato’s Pharmacy. Anyway, I have addressed all these questions in several of my videos so please take a look at various playlists.
This is what I was looking for...
Welcome.
Thank you Sir. Is it same for the discipline Sociology?
Thank you. I am not a sociologist but to deconstruct any text would generally follow the same process.
Do all texts deconstruct themselves?
A lot of scholars agreed on interpretting Derrida's given concepts ....Does this refute Derrida's argument about the undecidablitity of meaning/s?
Does Derrida utilise reason to belittle reason?..
Thank you. Obviously, I cannot answer all these questions and I encourage you to read and make up your own mind. As for texts deconstructing themselves: Texts don’t deconstruct themselves. They are offered to us as a whole with constituent parts; it is the critic who must find the places where the text fails it’s own logic and deconstruct it from within. This is just a basic video on Derrida, and only careful reading of Derrida’s works will help you in answering the questions.
@@masoodraja
You are right sir ,it is the critic who deconstructs a text ...I am just using a quotation "Western metaphysics:
Deconstruction as a mode of interpretation works by a careful and circumspect entering of each textual labyrinth.... The deconstructive
critic seeks to find, by this process of retracing, the element in the system
studied which is alogical, the thread in the text in question which will
unravel it all, or the loose stone which will pull down the whole building. The deconstruction, rather, annihilates the ground on which the
building stands by showing that the text has already annihilated the
ground, knowingly or unknowingly. Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself. "..."it has already dismantled itself(hillis miller)...miller might be exaggerating....because the contradictions are often implicit(in fact he is aware of that (but this is because of the nature of language) .....anway ,whether a text dismantles itself (figuratively or literally)or ...... Thanks a lot ,for your informative youtubes ,sir.
You are welcome. I think what he is suggesting it the text deconstructs itself because the unraveling is inscribed within it. So, technically, it will be the careful reading of a critic that would tease it out. But there are postmodern texts that constantly undo their own logic in the process of reading: Midnight’s Children, If on a Winters Night a Traveler etc etc. please also watch my videos on Plato’s Pharmacy.
Very informative thank you :)
You are welcome.
Nice sir
Thank you
Dr Sb, talk about Michel Foucault's ideas, sometime.
Thank you. Foucault is incorporated in my discussions of discourse and Orientalism but I will see if I can develop some videos specifically on Foucault
@@masoodraja I would appreciate that. Thank you so much.
Please make a video on Albert Camus 🥲
Thank you. I will probably try when I have some time.
Can I get the slides
Thank you. I think this link should allow you to access the slides: docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KQeKJCh19TACCQUbqVsr3SIgCe_mUQuEgkM99C5WzKw/edit
@@masoodraja Thanks