la population européenne ne vit pas que dans des villes. j'habite en France, en campagne. la gare la plus proche est à 15-20km donc la question ce pose.
@@preventiondechets1767 oui mais en France c'est tout a fait possible de conduire sa voiture vers la gare et se garer. Ou utiliser son vélo, qui est mieux. Donc, oui, ce sont des questions un peut drôles
@@preventiondechets1767 mais ca normal que si tu vis loin de la gare tu va conduire la avant se montrer sur train, c'est plus ecologique que conduire pour la toute route, par example a Varsovie si t'as un billet pour le metro tu peux parker pres de la station du metro gratuit et puis tu jusque prendre le metro
Yeah, finding someplace to put your bike is so much easier than finding somewhere to park your car. Just use a good bike lock and you’re good, at least where I live
Every central train station in The Netherlands has a parking garage for bikes, with Utrecht central station being the largest, having room for 12500 bikes. None of them have a parking garage for cars though
In some countries, like in Romania, it is a concern that people would steal your bike or some parts of it. Romania doesn't really have a good bicycle culture yet, although there is some progress.
And you can always take your bike on the train. It is not only useful to get from your home to the station, but also from the station at the destination to wherever you'll want to go.
I'm from Germany and it is so interesting to see things from another perspective. It really helps to remind myself that we all live in our small bubbles. thank you :) Oh and - one reason why our transportation system is not perfect: The trains are alway AND I MEAN ALWAYS late ;-;
an Austrian student who came to study in my french school said the biggest obstacle on his travel was the DeutschBahn... But yall prices for the same trains are better than french ones, so I still prefer Deutschbahn to go to Germany X)
Busses drive you to the train stations in Europe, so you don't have to run a train track through a village or city. We have busses in the smallest towns so people can still get around. And yes, you can also drive your bike to the train station. There are special stalls where you can safely put your bike.
In our town we have 3 bus stops not even 3 minutes (bus drive) apart from each other, I could walk to the next stop within 5 minutes. Being on the opposite end of town from the train station (10 minute walk) it's nice to have the bus in order to get there to get to school, even if I could get there within a reasonable time by foot! I'm very happy with our train/bus system in Europe (specifically germany) even if there's a small delay every now and then
@shar4803 exactly, in my miniature town, we also have like 5 or 6 bus stops with 5 minute walks apart. The bus that goes through the town passes 2 or 3 other towns and goes directly to a train station. From that train station you can go through the whole Netherlands, with 2 trains you can go from South to North
@@dennis_nl7587 Yeah like from ours it's a half an hour drive to the next one, connecting us to the rest of Germany and we could even drive (directly) to Paris. American train systems genuenly baffel me
What are you talking about? Most major European cities I've been to have subways or trams that take you to the train stations. Or both! But I guess You could take a bus too. If you wanna be miserable and get there SLOWLY!
As a European, seeing someone worry over how they'd get to the train station is kinda funny. My logical response is "just take the bus/tram/troley?" cause at least my area is very well connected, and the idea of not having any form of public transit within walking distance just does not compute!
Wyoming is 3% bigger than the UK and has a population that is 116 times smaller than the UK. What kind of public transportation do you think that place should have? The entire Midwest is pretty much like that. big city's defiantly need public transportation, but the rest of the country is way too big for it. The population of Wyoming is 578,000 population of the uk is 67 million
Like you said , if you have no Car then you still have a combined Bus and Metro System . People also cycle .you can even take your Bicycle on to public transport .though some times of the day cycles are not allowed on public transport at peaktimes .also bicycles can be taken on regional trains and some inter City trains .basically you do not need a car in most central European countries.
@John Spooner you got to remember that Europe is just as big as the USA, but not the population density is 143 people per square mile while America is 34 people per square mile. Rember about the same size, just almost 5x population density. They need it more than we do not that we don't the big city's really do need it
@@yodafloats9090 An interconnected rail network joining the towns and cities, with buses joining smaller ? You don't _all_ need to travel from one end of Wyoming to the other daily - surely? 48% of all USA car journeys are less than 3 miles; 20% are under *_one_* mile! I mean, do you people not have legs or something?! 🤣
@Vatican Cameos I'm not walking 3 miles to somewhere in -20 degrees whether let alone in spring or fall. But most of town in the us are more rural/ urban areas we git huge areas to cross with few Busses. It whould never be profitable for companies to do buss rutes there just in the big city's. Would it be nice ya but but not supper practical. Look up the cannon ball rum it's from NY to Los Angeles. The record is like 24 hours Long with Average speed to 110 mph that's a high speed train speed and the fact it would take 24 hours Is something, I would rather just fly that distance in like 6- 7 hours instead.
There are "park-and-ride" schemes in europe, where you drive your car or bike to a train or tram station to take public transport in the cities. Secure parking facilities for both cars and bikes are indeed provided at these places.
Toronto and other major cities in Canada have kiss and ride schemes! With some parking options. We add love to your commute! Stay safe, stay sane, stay strong Ukraine 🇺🇦
Many now have park and ride on the outskirts near to highway interchanges served by metro, tram or bus systems into the city centre. Often the parking is free when you buy a day transit ticket
I live in Madrid and you'd genuinely be surprised by how easy it is to travel through the whole city without a car only with the Metro (subway) and any bus. And this is only 8€ for as many uses as you want for a whole MONTH for people under 26yo I think. Also I think it'd interesting for an American citizen to see how interrail works in Europe, I did one with my friends this year and it seemed unimaginable to travel so much distance (8 countries) without the possibility to take some kind of public transportation since we just couldn't have a car
Since retiring, I've spent some time travelling through Europe. It is almost sickening to come back to the USA to see how badly we have designed society. Many in Europe have shared car for out of town weekend trips, etc. They don't need one daily but the sharing gives them freedom. I've traveled extensively for a month at a time and rented a car only once each trip for an overnight excursion to some really remote destination. Mass transit is so easy, practically taking you from door to door with the mix of trains, subways, trams & busses. And all inclusive transportation passes are super affordable, no comparison to the expense of a car.
its nice to have, but I I would prefer cheapers cars, gas and more space. its nice to not need a parking lot in a big city, but I dont care about living in a city. I want to enjoy my car, and have my space, and make my own schedule.
@@sshreddderr9409 And then you get huge obesity rates, almost no public spaces, food deserts, ecology deterioration. And the cherry on the cake. You don't even realise how much time do you waste because 1 - everything is so far away, 2 - Cars are slover and I'm not counting in the time to park, maintain it or traffic jams. Berlin - München: 6 hours by car, 4 hours by train. One more thing is safety, (US - 120 death per million, EU - 40) Also, prices. I pay 49€ (53$) per month to use all types of public transportation in Germany, except DB. But all subways, buses, sbahns and even ferries are included.
As a non car owner in the UK. It’s extremely easy to travel almost anywhere I like using Train and then Bus. The cost of travel isn’t too bad and it’s almost stress free compared to driving. It’s great! Apart from when there’s cancellations and strikes… which is often.
Im British living in Bulgaria - the transport here is just amazing. Flat rate 70p for any length of but trip on brand new battery electric busses. Even the remote villages get 1 bus an hour to the city and where I live its every 7 minuts
Am in Berlin, Germany and get mad when I have to wait for more than 5 mins for the train 😂. At night you usually have to wait around 15min for a train. Buses can take longer like 10-30min. And ofc there are frequent delays. Also I don't have a driver license and prob will never get one
similiar here in lisbon, i stoped even bringing the car while im living in the city, another thing that reduces traffic( we call it trafego, i know this m8 sound other thing to tother languages ) is alot of services people dont need to go to the local, alot actually can be used or called online, medics, social services, assurance, even most time i dont go to the market store they come to me :) and every corner we have bakeries, local markets barbers, pet clinics etc, just need a small 1 minute walk, and both subway and train station is a 5 to 7 minutes walk at max.
That's fine if you're travelling within a big city or from one big city to another in the UK: not so good as soon as you get out of the principal urban areas and especially so in the rural areas. Even if you live in a non-metropolitan town, you may find that there are few or no evening services. Public transport in Britain is very patchy and journeys may involve unwanted detours and numerous changes and take a very long time as a result. Buses are often late or do not turn up and when that fact is coupled with infrequency and discomfort in bad weather, many people avoid them. I use real-time timetables on the internet and there will often be a countdown to a bus, only for the tracing for that bus to disappear entirely when it is overdue and the next bus one hour later to show as the next one.
And you guys share a hobby with us Germans. Although the train service is on average pretty okay compared to the rest of the (non-European) world, you like to complain about it :)
6:58 its the perfect example for what goes wrong with north america’s car centric society. When thinking about how to get somewhere you immediately think about going there by car, its the default option - no questions asked. But when thinking about taking the bike you wonder were to put your BIKE… I think its hilarious considering the differences in effort to creating car parking spaces compared to cycle stands…
Wyoming is 3% bigger than the UK and has a population that is 116 times smaller than the UK. What kind of public transportation do you think that place should have? The entire Midwest is pretty much like that. big city's defiantly need public transportation, but the rest of the country is way too big for it.
@@yodafloats9090 that doesn‘t excuse the “limited” perspective about the topic at hand in the population. One should still consider cycling if it’s a viable option.
@@peterw.8434 well American cities are so spread out that biking just isn’t an option for most trips Americans go on. It’s too late to save America at this point. It won’t be profitable anymore to put public transit in the Midwest because Americans don’t go out of their town or state often and most Americans drive as their first thought
As a person from Czechia this part 11:20 was taken for granted but watching This i realised how much free space we have for walking in EU
Před 11 měsíci+25
hi, dutchie here. we have a very dense railnetwork were in a lot of routes there are trains leaving about every fifteen minutes (to the same destination). virtually every trainstation is also a busstop, making it very easy to take the bus to the trainstation. and if you have ever seen the photo's of our bike-parking spaces, they are not photoshopped, and biking is indeed very popular here, so that is also a way to get there. some people take their car to the trainstation, simply because parking in some of the larger (and older) cities is not only difficult, ,but also more expensive than taking the train. it probably helps that the Netherlands are one of the most densely populated countries, everything is pretty close together.
" Most people in Europe own a car , though ..." - I actually got rid of my car six months ago - and I am surprised at how "relaxed" I am when I get home from work after an hour on the train compared to 90 minutes in heavy car traffic.
And don’t forget you can read, listen to Musik, do homework (done that so often as a student) etc while getting transported. Not possible whilst driving a car
I bought myself a car when I started a new job, cus by train it was 60+ minutes and by car 20 minutes, and I live and work in a major city in Germany. But individual anecdotes don't tell much, studies does. A study say that car is much faster most times, even with traffic included. But that's why you have both in Europe, car and public traffic.
@@Delibro Depends. I refuse to own a car, because I live in a centre of a big city in Europe and know from experience how much time it takes to move from one street to another by car (most often it is faster to just walk which is absurd in itself). And it's not anegdotal, it's as obvious to everyone as the sun rising on the East. So, every time my family visits me, I had to include them being late at least half an hour, despite knowing it would take less without a car. The most efficient and fast transportation you can get to commute in a big city is a combination of tram/train/metro and electric kickscooter. That's a jackpot combination. Only when you need to move long distances form village to village the car would be much more efficient.
Greetings from Europe! I am very much impressed by how intelligent your questions and comments actually were and how you strike the perfect balance between what is the ideal and what is actually realistically possible to achieve. Very nice video, keep the good job!
It is worth mentioning that Germany is kind of different from rest of the Europe. They don't have that big cities, more like lots of medium sized cities with sourounding suburbs looking like small villages. Motorway system called AutoBahn is fantastic and THERE ARE NO SPEED LIMITS. When german person says that his job is 40 minutes away it actually may be 60 miles away because once on motorway it is pedal to the metal. Great fun for car driving.
Well, not all of the Autobahn is without speedlimit. Most of all there is one. And nowadays there is a discussion about having a general speedlimit, what is highly needed.
I can understand this situation better than others. I live in Europe, but in a poor region (Sicily, southern Italy). Here, a car is a must. Public transport are still not a very attractive option. But. I went to work to northern Italy for five months. I went there with my car, thinking I would need it sometime. No. I didn't. I had to go to my car and turn it on weekly just to not make the battery die. Because the public transports were so well designed and cost-effective that actually driving the car was a loss of time and money. Now there are big investments to enhance public transports in my city, and I like the design that was announced. I am looking forward to use them in the future. Maybe I won't need to own a car at all.
Però onestamente avere la macchina è meglio. Puoi andare dove vuoi all'ora che vuoi, e non ti devi sorbire tutti gli zozzi e i ladri che trovi sui mezzi pubblici. Già in Toscana, parlando dell'area urbana di Firenze, Prato e Pistoia, dopo il tramonto sei a piedi. Fuori dai centri urbani poi non c'è alternativa. E non conviene neanche averla, per l'uso che se ne farebbe costerebbe troppo e non sarebbe versatile. È più semplice avere mezzi propri. Certo, forse in alcuni grandi centri urbani magari conviene potenziare i mezzi pubblici e conviene dare il più possibile la possibilità a chi viene da fuori città di poter lasciare l'auto fuori dalle mura e di spostarsi coi mezzi pubblici. Non a caso a Roma ci sono gli autobus notturni, avendo un turismo e una vita notturna importanti se lo possono permettere.
+antoniodario... In the south of Italy public transport a catastrophy. The time tables are completely arbitrary. From Cosenza to Lecce you need a whole day although it's only 150 km - that's the distance I did (once) on rollerskates! So I'm as fast on Rollerskates than an Italian train in the south.
@@svenlima Salerno-Reggio Calabria has improved drastically in recent years. Let's hope we will be able to see the rest becoming at least "decent" in the next years.
I live in Basel, Switzerland. There are actual studies here that show, that the fastest way to get from any point in the city to another is actually by bike. Followed by public transport of course. Cars aren't even allowed to drive in the large parts of the inner city.
Yeah, public transit is kinda meh in the European countryside (even in Germany, which damn well should have the money for good public transport). It usually gets you to the biggest city in the region in acceptable time (and from there to other large cities), but if you want to go anywhere else, you're SoL. And long distance train tickets are still often twice as expensive as taking the car, even with the high taxes on gasoline. Our railway system used to be good up to the 90s, but nowadays it's rapidly approaching American levels.
I live in Warsaw. Within 10min walk I have: a huge shopping center, another two grocery stores, gas station, pool, metro station, two bus stations, church, vet, dentist and probably millions other places you usually don’t visit often. I’m not kidding. To get to work I simply walk to the bus stop that is 100m away from my apartment. And the drive time is exactly 12minutes. I have been to US twice. I love this country, awesome people, beautiful nature, great memories. But the transportation system SUCKS, there is so many things wrong with it that I don’t know where to start. Just let me tell one thing. I lived in some kind of residential area where nearest shop was 15minutes away BY CAR.
yeah, every metropolitan city has that mate, nothing new. Ever been to NYC? you have everything within 5-minute walk as well... But the roads freaking suck in EU. So 5 minute walk is like 20 minute drive there. US if its 5 minute walk its 3 minute drive XD.
@@lecoureurdesbois86 I live in a low density area, I have everything I need in my village. And even a train station, with trains which go to the main lines every hour. So yeah, I do expect at least shops tbh, even if they're small
@@yushkovyaroslavThe thing is European infrastructure is based around pedestrians, whereas the US is mainly focused on car infrastructure, which is why the US has massive roads and wider cars, whereas Europe has smaller roads and therefore cars
@@thecursedgalleon7096 nope. it's not focused on anything it was build when there were no cars and mainly build "as the horses went" and horses go randomly. They had no design and clue what they were doing. (Only Germany changed that design during 1900s because they were desperately trying to get ahead of all of Europe, and it worked. for all the wrong reasons) Having straight roads is best for cars and pedestrians, as its 100 times easier to navigate. You can go anywhere in the city without a gps in US and in EU you can only do it if you lived there for years since the roads designs make absolutely no sense. The reason it even matters is not only that its more comfortable and less of a pain, but also that it is a logistic nightmare to do large scale operations anywhere in EU if it's not Germany. If any EU country had even 25% of US logistics it would collapse on itself because of its road infrastructure that is littered with unnecessary things, roadblocks, over complicated turns, illogical pathing, extra milage roads that go around instead of through an area, illogical spacing, and most importantly no logical design whatsoever. (Talking about in cities, the highways are actually really well designed in most areas) There is nothing good about it in the modern world. If people like the infrastructure and design of EU cities that is one thing, but the roads is a vital organ of a country's logistics and anyone who is worth anything understands that its very unfortunate that EU ended up like this due to its early historic success. Similar to US adapting the imperial system and is unable to change it now even though it makes absolutely no sense. But as time goes by and economies continue to grow this has too and will be changed, but current generation will not live to see it, most likely.
Im from austria, i live in Vienna. We own 1 Car for 2 people, but use it maybe once a month. We used to live in the Countryside too where we both needed a car on a daily basis, because there was only 1 train and 1 bus (the bus came only at 6am and in the evening, in 4 years living there i havent seen that bus even once) So yes.. you still need a car when you live in the countryside. but the nearer you are to the city the better the public transortation becomes.
The difference is just that European cities were built long before cars were invented. Some cities are 2000 years old, but most at least a 1000 years or so. In South East France, at the Italian border, where I live, the landscape is rather steep towards an amazing coastline, and villages were built with steps leading further up. There are steps everywhere. These were built hundreds of years ago. Now a fancy city like Monaco has ajusted to this by building lifts next to the steps. So you do not need a car at all.
Well but tbf American cities also weren’t build around cars. There are good photos on the internet where you can see many cities 80 years ago. They were TRANSFORMED to be car cities. Like the video mentioned in America many homes were destroyed to build highways. Even to day they do this. Same for the Netherlands. When you go back 80 years you will see that the cities arnt build around bikes. It was as car centric as any another European city but they transformed it to be one. Boston is a great example where they didn’t destroy the whole city just for highways and parking lots.
@@Fabii2000 When there weren't many cars, Europe was also more car focused. It was more difficult do do (also because of the history - you won't destroy a church that has 1000 years in order to build a road). Nowadays the EU promotes alternatives to cars.
@@Fabii2000 well America did this because at the time, cars seemed so modern and these highways were meant to help with transportation between cities. Most European cities were still focused on rebuilding after WW2 and also wanted to preserve their cities
@@incaseofimportantnegotiations i'd like a chariot ride to work and back and crap at them peasants i have to work with (that's a joke lads, don't take this seriously!)
Driving to the train station is an actual thing by the way. It’s called Park and Ride and is usually done outside of cities so that you don’t have to find parking in city itself but rather just outside where there is more space for parking
@@brandondavis7777 Wao... Did not expect this for sure. They don't make me a slave. If I can park my car at the city border and use public transportation to move around, without sitting in the traffic jam for hours. I will park my car, because I can use my legs and there is a good alternative. Yet, I fail to see the slavery in this and many more millions who would love to have alternative for a car.
The guy from Not Just Bikes explaines it really well. Since road need major maintenance every 25 years it gives the city the option to redesign the road. City planners can make different choices to include bicycle lanes that are seperate from the roads. Add mixed zoning laws and you wouldn''t need to drive 10 miles to the grocery store. I live in a small town and i have four grocery stores within half a mile. Don't need a car just to buy food.
The map at 0:35 shows maybe about 5% of the network in europe. It must have been reduced to some main connections that cross borders or so. The map itself is doing a horrible job at showing the actual density of the network. And the narrator even describes this totally simplified and thinned out map as incredibly dense and there are almost no areas without coverage. Oh man. And the road network at 4:34 where he probably means Interstates and major highways is even worse. I am sorry but this guy keeps comparing apples with oranges and it's funny
Exactly. You can't stress it enough that the actual rail and road networks in Europe are way, way, way more dense than presented in the original video. The maps look like some sort of joke to me.
But still, it's merely a simplified artistic map they use on their website but has nothing to do with the actual train network. There is no such thing as "the interrail". It's a ticket, not a network.
in germany those roades where people are just walking are called "fußgängerzone" and they are in the older parts of cities so the houses dont get dmgd etc
I am 33 years old, grew up in Sweden and now living in Hungary, traveled to Finland, Denmark, Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Greece and Spain to name a few. I dont have a drivers license and only used public transportation. Okay, I have cheated a few times and taken a cab but Its less than 10 times.
@@tomasbriceno2319 its not really public tho since you are a private customer and there are no strangers inside the cab besides the driver who you are paying
@@Jay-tv2lz It's public since the user does not own the car and each car is used by many people. Also cabs (at least in Europe) are regulated by either the gobernment or the municiplaty, even if they are not owned by public agencies. We can argue abut carsharing services where you drive a hired car or about private unregulated services like Uber and Cabify, since these are a bit outside those rules. However, taxi services, at least in Spain (my country) and most European contries I've been to are considered public transportation.
I only ever take a cab in the night when there is no train service in my home town. Last train arrives around 1 in the night and first one is around 5:30. Had to do that maybe twice in my life. Usually its easier to just sleep over at a friends place if I go out in a city. Also dont have a drivers license in my 30s. My girlfriend thinks its a bit weird but I just cant be bothered to pay about 3000 euro just to get a piece of paper that says I can drive when I dont want or need to own a car. Would be useful for emergencies but then I can just call a cab and it saves a lot of money not owning a car. If my girlfriend comes over I usually call her a cab from the train station, it costs me 20-30 euro which is expensive but I can easily afford that out of the 500 euro a month I dont spend on car ownership.
Actually, there are a lot of places where the train goes through a neighborhood. This usually happens when the cities grow, and the new suburbia gets built along the rail. You usually can find smaller stations similar to bus stops too, so the people who live there have an easy access to travel. Also, most people in Europe don't necessarily need a car (or even a bike) for the daily life, because public transportation can usually manage the work commuters, and if you need groceries or something, there are small shops everywhere, within a 5-10 minute distance. And when I say 5-10 minute, I mean on foot, not with a car.
I definitely have to disagree on the point we don't need cars. I live in germany and in the countryside (still one of the better connected rural areas though) and you most definitely need a car here. Public transport is great in the larger cities but not in the countryside. For my last job I had to drive about 30 minutes or alternatively (but not really) I could take the bus the evening before, sleep at a random busstop and take another bus for the last stretch. There was literally no other way to be at my place of work at 8am. Busses and trains leve here about every few hours. But they won't take you everywhere and on weekends or after like 9pm you're stuck. And did I mention about 70% of busses only go on school days?
@@vrenelimeyer2856 Most people do live in cities or close to cities, though. And with a combination of bike and bus/train, really, most people could manage.
@@viomouse hey not sure about it. I mean, many people don´t need a car if they live and work in same city, but still you have some scenarios where car is better option. Traveling long distance to some village is one of them, transporting bigger things, and even going for trip or hike. Many people have car, like their car, but they use it sensible, so they dont go into the center of city with it, they dont commute every day with it, they just know when car makes sense
@@Desperoro Yes, I agree on the transporting bigger things or travelling to farout countryside villages. But unfortunately I see the problem that most people don't use their car in a sensible way. People have a car and then use it for everything, also for travelling into a nearby city center. And then there is the thing of having multiple cars in a family which often times is nothing but luxury. With this thoughtless use of a car, they provide perfect targets for the anti-car political campaigns. I'm pro car but I urge people think to what to use it for, and maybe use public transportation or bikes and such in a complementary way.
yep because ppl lives in downtown and there are shops on the 0 floors and apartments/ condos on the top, so sometimes you just go downstairs to do your groceries , buy books, clothes, at small cities like mine ( 35.000 inhabitants) there's no culture of a mall where all shops are there together.
The yellow lines you see are just the main rail routes. There are many more regional rail routes in Europe, but they are all connected to the main rail routes. When I was younger I loved to travel all over Germany by train. When you travel by train you see a lot more of Germany than when you take the autobahn. On the Autobahn you have to concentrate on driving and on the train you can look out the window and take in the scenery. I have also travelled to other countries by train, such as France, Switzerland, Poland, the Netherlands and Austria. Most EU countries belong to the Schengen area, so travelling is very easy because there are no more border controls. Although Norway is not part of the EU, but it is a member of the Schengen area because the EU has signed an association agreement with Norway. The only exception is the Norwegian island of Svalbard as this island is not part of the Schengen area. Svalbard is also very complicated from a legal point of view, as Norway shares sovereignty over Svalbard with Russia. This contract between Norway and Russia over Svalbard is very old. Iceland is also not a member of the EU but is part of the Schengen area. The EU has also concluded an association agreement with Iceland. However, Switzerland has overdone it because it has signed so many treaties with the EU that it can enjoy all the benefits of the EU without being a member. Many Europeans don't think that's great.
Well... actualy these are not even the main ones, because some routes appear on this map and don't exist IRL (ex : Lyon-Bordeaux in France). So yes there are way more than on this map BUT this map isn't even accurate regarding the main routes. I don't know where they took their information but it's quite wrong.
@@noefillon1749 That map shows just the European Union planning for *major* corridors inside Europe for 2030!!!! Completely false as of 2023! And that's only for major corridors, but not at all for the *HUGE* infrastructure currently active. For example in Spain there are 18,000 km of highways and 4,000 km of High Speed Railways, along with the old 280,000 km of conventional roads. And that's just a tenth (10%) of all European transport network!!!!!!!
American here, I have a similar story to yours (commonly traveling) and can recognize the fun of it, but as an American, we don’t really have that many trains like the video says, though the video only mentions a single railroad company, unfortunately the videos correct on the whole car thing and that’s where I regret this country’s infrastructure, it’s not that much fun to ride in cars for hours when traveling, so I would rather have their infrastructure
fun fact: where i live, we have at least 8 parking locations scattered throughout the city(4 or 5 in the city centre), all either stacked up in the silhouette of the other buildings in the block or simply underground. theres very little genuine parking lots anywhere, most of them are either just a line of lots along the street side or 10-30 spaces per shop if theyre a little further from the centre.
The parking garages also charge by the hour which gives people an incentive not to drive their cars into the cities. In Amsterdam parking can cost up to 10 euro per hour. Better to park at a train or metro station outside the city and take the train to the city center.
One of my Uni profesor told us. "The easiest way to tell if a country is truly developed and not pretending, they must have more public transportation than cars."
It's not convenient for all situations. Public transportation works in big cities with lots of tourists and night life, where you can run it at every hour and still gain from it. Outside the downtown of the main touristic cities it just isn't convenient. It costs way less, both in price and in enviromental impact, to have private vehicles rather than have an efficient public transportation that can satisfy everyone, if in most places you have to move around just a bunch of people in a span of hours.
If you want to go to European cities then I advise you to take the parking lot in front of the city and take the rest of the way by bus or train. Finding a parking space in the city can be a big task.
And expensive. When I'm going with my RV I use a campsite and the get a day pass which often is less expensive then parking for 3 hours in the city. Working in the (my) inner city is nearly impossible by car. Most of the area is only 3h parking (for about 2€/h) if you don't live there. And you still need to find a free spot. Parking houses are even more expensive. Parking lots are very rare.
Which is by design. Parking lots create distance. However it is density that improves people's lives (having all nessesarry stores close). And also businesses (having plenty of customers).
@@iamcurious9541 And a lot of it is simple history and not killing everything of it. In the 60ies there were car centric changes but not to that extent as in the US. And of course not in the old parts of the cities if they survived the war. And there often is just no place for parking lots and ground is expensive. Apart from parking houses there is only one open parking lot in the center of my town which has only about 20-30 spots. And of course some at the side of the roads.
It's not necessary to leave it in front of the cities, in most cities you can find parking spots for days in residential areas. And from there there's usually like a 5-10 minute walk to the city center. And again it depends which city it is, if it's München or Bucharest at rush hour we're talking about then you might not find parking spots even on the edge of the city.
the train 7:06 is from switzerland (sbb = schweizer bundes bahn) and in my opinion the best train system in europe (im from switzerland and know really well how they look like). fun fact in switzerland travelling with train is faster than with a car cause of speed limit 120 km/h and the pretty good job of sbb
11:31 YES that‘s one of the best parts of European city centers. In Germany, these roads are called „Fußgängerzone“ (pedestrian zone) and can be pretty big, like several blocks.
@@Zure619 in the US, the only "pedestrian zones" that i can think of, are malls, where as in europe they dedicate entire parts of a city to be pedestrian zones.
@@georgwarhead2801 in Gent starting from the nineties, goed city goverment because there was a huge resistance! especially from shops ! in the end, shops did way better, EXCEPT those that selled really big things like electronics and such, those have been pushed away. you need a special licence if you really need to be there to be allowed in :). and it contains the biggest part of the historic mediaval city center, so busy that they started a few years ago to forbid cycling in 2 busy shopping street on saterday between the usually pretty busy hours ;).
I took the train from New York City to Williamsburg Virginia once - about 400 miles. It took 11 hours. (scheduled for about 8 hours) Same distance from London to Edinburgh is scheduled at about 4 1/2 hours.
London to Edinburgh (Waverley) by train: distance of around 332 miles (534 km). 4h 10m on the fastest services. That's 83mph or 133 kph. It's slow by European standards. French TGV Paris-Bordeaux: 2h03mn for a 630 km long travel.
@@verttijineu2776 Only 332 miles? I took the distance from Google maps, but that was by road. I know it's slow compared to high speed lines in Europe but compared to Amtrak it's like teleporting!
@@verttijineu2776 TGV and ICE are still bit of an exception. If you would look on something like Open Railway Map, then most of the lines are build for much lower speed.
"Where do you put the bike" Well, in the train. In newer trains, there are dedicated spaces for bikes, not a lot, but there are, and beside, there are few people that go to the train station with a bike, so that checks out. For the older trains, well, it's simple actually. If there are older trains in your line, it means there are fewer people that takes it, so there is a *LOT* of space in the train, put your bike wherever. I live in the middle of fuckall in France, when I need to take the train, it's always almost empty even a peak hours Also, if you don't see any parking garage on the surface, it means they are underground. The biggest town near where I live is Metz, and *ALL* the public parking space is underground, in huge multi-level garages that are secure, cheap, easy to access, in key points (center of the town, underneath malls, landmarks, etc...) and *numerous* You get the best of both worlds, beautiful rustic cities and space for your car. Win-win
There are actually places at many, if not most, train stations in Europe where you can put and lock up your bike. Some of them are public and free to use, for some you have to pay (which have higher security), and I have seen that at some stations you can even rent a spot inside of a secure area to leave your bike there on a regular basis, e.g. when you have to go to work by train.
as a dutch person who uses the train daily: we bike to the station and theres bike parking lots (well racks, lots of em) at the station. and then we have another "station bike" (aka run down bike that we all buy 2nd hand for a few bucks, most likely stolen but we dont care) to bike further. but also loads of steps and skateboard users take theit mode of transport with them on the train.
Or, as many Dutch people nowadays do, rent a public transit bike at the destination station! :) For non-dutch people, YES! we have "public transit" bikes haha. They're basically just rental bikes, except we use our public transit passes to rent them and they get billed as part of public transit journeys, making renting those bikes much less of a hassle. I can walk into the bike rental at the station, take a bike, present my pass, and walk out with the bike all under a minute or so.
Thanks for the video!! I’m from Spain and I think that the main difference between Europe and the US is that European population is more highly packed in cities and towns of all sizes. Meaning that many small villages in my region (Navarre) may have a health center and a primary school and grocery stores, even small ones. In some villages even the doctor, the priest and even the baker truck will get to the village so elder people no need to move. My priest, for instance will spend most of Sunday morning driving from village to village. Thanks again 👍👍
I live in sweden and public transport is really well designed.... I have four bus stations near me that are closer than 100m to where I live, using them can get to the train station within 10 minutes, and it's the same ticket that works for trains, buses, subway and even some boats, so I can go from my home, with a bus to closest train station and then with train to closest subway to ride a subway to Stockholm on the same ticket!
In Italy there is a saying "Every road leads to Rome". Literally you can pick any road from north Italy and by the time you get close Bologna you start to see signs for Rome. Even roads to the country side can lead you easily there without using highways (especially if you don't want to pay for the toll) but it will take more time to reach
Same in german, and tbh i saw various times roadconstruction that removed all to the cobblestone layer and i am actually living on a roman build street in cologne.Its still cobblestone.
that's because the earliest roads were built by Roman legions to be used by the Roman legions when conqu... ahem... I mean defending, yes, defending Rome
A lot of the parking spaces in the larger cities here in the Netherlands are actually underground or very well hidden (A lot of the other countries in Europe have this as well, but this is from my Dutch experience). When these cities were build, cars didn't exist yet so we couldn't 'keep them in mind' while planning. Has forced us to be creative that's for sure.
Actually, that is not how things went. 'Not just bikes' is a YT channel that has a lot of interesting videos about this subject. It comes down to making certain choices, which were made in the '90s.
@@carmenl163 Many (and i mean MANY) cities all over Europe were already well established (and their main roads too) before the 1800s... All that those '90s could do was to ask how they can FIT what is already there, without razing it all down and starting from scratch...
@@irrelevant_noob That's not what happened. During the sixties and seventies there were made many adjustments for cars. In the 90's those were undone. NJB shows this in his videos.
@@carmenl163 idk... when you say "adjustments" i can only think how a whole neighborhood was flattened in my city to make room for a grandiose palace. And even that didn't quite "fix" the roads. Not much point in having 6 lanes there if all the access routes will only be 2-wide.
I lived in Hamburg for about 20 years and most of them I didn't own a car, but then I increasingly felt a need to be in nature and by the seaside, so the last 4 years living in Hamburg I had a car, but only used it on the weekends to get out of the city. Now I live at the Baltic Sea in a very beautiful but remote spot. It would be impossible to live here without a car. What I really wanted to say is, even in Europe it depends pretty much on where you live...
I live in one of the biggest cities in Italy and to me owning a car would be a waste of money and time (since it'd be too hard to find a free parking lot), so I use the public transport, which isn't bad after all, and I can go around the whole country (and continent) with not much to worry about. Just a correction on the video you were watching: you can move to another EU country for as long as you please. There isn't such a thing as a timed "visa" or permit to get to another European country, if both adhere to the Schengen treaty
As a Flemish guy I really hope our incompetent government will incorperate those big 'stackable' bike parkings now that our leftist goverbnment wants to make everything more green thus taking away parking space for the greenery thus making you pay for the fewer parking spaces we'll have where before you could stand 2h for free with a blue parking disc.
@@dennisengelen2517 In Gent Dampoort we have stackable bike parkings, only downside is, that you can't secure your bicycle as well. Also better and more efficient parking structures would be nice with a good connection to public transport would improve it a lot. But I do agree that we need better, safer (, and more) parking spaces for bicycles. Instead of them cluttering sidewalks and thus making them less safe. Even though I am neutral on the political spectrum and am more left leaning in what I vote, I can understand your frustration, and think parking should be much better, easier and cheaper with cars. But in my opinion it should be done in such a way that we don't have to see the cars parked everywhere, instead proper underground parkings everywhere. I hate seeing plazas full of cars. Instead of being angry at each other, we should think about how we can compromise and find a solution for us both. I don't think it's as much the government being leftist, as it probably is that the EU is putting pressure on countries to do these things, and Belgium does not want to be left behind .
i live in rural germany and i own a car. I rarely travel by train or bus. But when i do, the next bus stop i just 500 meters away and the bus drives to the train station. Bus schedules are pinned at the bus stop or available online. Bigger cities have a "park and ride" parkinglot in the outskirts of the city. Its safe to park your car there and travel to the city center by bus. Most cities are lacking parkingslots and/or are really expensive.
That was both interesting and very depressing for me as a citizen of the U.S. I knew that we were behind Europe in this regard, but did not realize how far apart we were in efficient transportation. Like you, Ryan, I was horrified to learn that there is a greater emphasis on parking, than housing. When I heard that, my first thought was: Well, that explains our growing problem with homelessness. I think this proves to a point what I have come to believe, that the U.S., being so determinedly capitalistic, does mean that those with financial wealth do get the most effective lives, and those who have less and those at the bottom of the economic ladder truly do get the least, and our planning insures that. How sad its that? The sad thing to me is understanding that we could provide access and full participation in society at all levels, but we choose not to. Individual wealth is more important than societal health it appears.
step 1: make a tight public transport network as viable alternatives to cars step 2: with less demand to do every trip by car, reduce parking spaces step 3: turn parking spaces into affordable houses and local businesses. (It isn't uncommon to have multi storey apartment buildings with small businesses on the ground floor in Europe) As good example, there is a big box store here (Used to be Werkauf, was part of Walmart when they tried and failed to enter the market) and is now part of Edeka) that has a bus that connects it to the tram nearby. It's a bus that only runs through business hours and only has two stops (the store and the tram) but it connects the store to the wider network across the industrial park and autobahn that are in between. Imagine if you had a bus just to connect the local Walmart to the (comfortable and fast) tram that goes along the next big road. Why go by car if you can cross the parking lot without any work of your own.
@@HappyBeezerStudios Step 1. Remember Europea nations are tiny as fuck and irrelevant. 2. Remember step 1 3. Nobody wants that near their houses, noise and pollution are terrible.
Here we go again, Europe good, America bad. Also Living in metro cities good, while living in rural area or the suburbs bad yet again. Nothing but a bunch of angry, envious people coping.
where i live, there are parking spots for bikes by the stations but you can also take it with you on the train. my dad goes by foldable bike and train to work almost every day and i study in the city and take the train back and forth each week
😁 Just last year (maybe the year before), they put a large, well-lit, covered bike parking lot next to the ministerium here in Vienna. It's pretty nice.
Its insane how good the transportation system is in europe. If live in Germany but go to school in austria so every day I go by train and by bus to go to school
Normally you take the bus from near your house to the next trainstation if it to far away to walk or ride a bike.... Most EU trainstations got something like a secured bike parking lot.
As a Swiss I often drive my car to the trainstation when skiing to prevent the traffic jam down the mountain at the end of the day. There is lots of „park + ride“ options close to big cities as well, as parking is a nightmare. The bike you just lock in the bike parking. 😅
You walk to the bus stop (usually not more than 5 minutes in almost all towns and villages) you ride the bus to the trainstation (usually not more than 10 minutes) Then you can use the train to go to almost any city in your country (1-6 hours, in germany at least) But still. In more rural areas in germany you still need a car, but guess what: The traffic density is low enough that there is no congestion. (We still have a lot of problems with trains, don´t get me wrong, but it´s nothing compared to US)
You can take your bike with you on the train. Some train stations also have some kind of 'bike garage' to store your bike safely until you come back later. Some bus stations have those too.
Yes, particulary in rural or suburban areas of europe commuters are using their cars to go the first miles to the train station. There they have large parking lots to leave the cars, and the people are using public transport to reach their offices/factories in town. We call it park & ride. The newest development is to build bycicle garages and electric car rentals at the suburbn train stations to give the people an alternative for the first/last miles.
idk in other countries, but in denmark, we usually get "parking complexes" where they just add layer upon layer of parking spots, and they usually sit in centralized locations so we have minimal walking time from parking to a wide range of stores
I commute in to London by train fairly regularly. Depending on where I'm starting from/time of year/amount of luggage, I either take one of my bikes on the train with me (one is a folding bike so I can even take it on the Tube), or yes - I drive to the train station, leave my car in the station car park, and get the train into central London. It's _possible_ to drive into London, but no-one does because it would take twice as long, cost twice as much, and be at least twice as stressful. As it is, I can work on the train, watch a film, read a book, nap, chat to friends, or just gaze out the window for a bit. Our rail network used to have a strap line - _"Let the train take the strain..."_
In spain, in some cities you can have a card to rent a bike in specific spots operated with machines on the street, go where you need, and normally, close to you, you have another same spot to deposit the bike. And normally in big cities, if you have an old car (15 to 20 years, depending if it is diesel or gasoline), you are not allowed to enter in the city because of the pollution.
6:15 Yes, most people in Europe own a car, but no, they don't drive it to the train station. Train stations are easily accessible by bicycle or bus connections. Most large city centers are also devoid of cars, with parking garages on the edges of the city (which are usually accessible by highway rings around the city).
Now that was a gross generalisation. In fact many cities have a park and ride system and many people coming from the suburbs will go to the train station with their car. Also, center of cities being pedestrian also isn't that common. Guess you must be from Netherlands because it's literally the only country where all of this applies, but Netherlands beats the rest of Europe by a huge gap here
@@sidlerm1 Many? What shit are you spewing? You pulled that info out your ass? You can travel to train station by car, but most people arrived their by any means that are not cars, be it public transport, biking or by foot.
French HST : TGV Paris-Bordeaux, travel on Tuesday January 31, departure Paris 9:11 am - arrival Bordeaux 11:14 am, journey time 2h03mn for a 630 km long travel, priced at 22euros.
In Brisbane, there are free car parks at the suburban railway stations for all day parking if needed. You can also ride your bike to the station and then take it on the train if you need to. I walk to the station from my place as do a lot of other people.
To give you an example, I live in a small town, back when I was a student, I had no money for a car, but I still had the possibility to take a bus and then a tramway to get me to my school in a bigger city. And now, if I want to Paris for example, I can either take a longer trip by bike to the closest train station and park it there, I could take my car to the train station (it's a small one, with a small parking, usually more than enough), and then, about an hour later, I'm in Paris where either bus or metro will get me almost everywhere (and if it's not enough, I can use the available bikes). Now, about parking itself, it's rare to see large parking places outside of just shopping centers, most of the time, parking is either on the side of the road or in underground parkings.
In Germany, where i live, the government incentives projects known as „Park and Ride“ where rural areas receive money to build parking lots and bike racks at their train stations, so people who would normally use the car to get to a city, use the train. You may notice a blue sign with „P+R“ when you’re at a rural trainstation. But this is also due to the fact that they want to enable the youth to have an option to get from A to B before they are allowed to drive when they turn 18.
to answer your question about how to get to the train station, from a personal perspective, i live in a tiny village of around 200-250 people and we have two bus stations, that you can get to in like 5-8 minutes from the furthest houses. sure, because it's such a small village, the buses only run once every two hours on average and one of the lines only runs on weekdays, but it's still very easily workable around and to live here, unless you need to haul big and heavy things often, you do not need a car at all, even for an area that's considered quite remote. when i'm in the city for uni, there are buses, trams and metro that runs everywhere at all times of the day (of course there's not that many night lines, but those only operate from 1-5 am, any other time the regular transport runs very often) and even if you don't use public transport, biking is almost always a viable option, since everything is so close together
4:43 This is an mistake in the OG. When you see this graphic he says the EU isn't on that list, correct BUT Then says European countries are NOT on that list BUT Russia and Ukraine are part of Europe.
You actually immediately picked up on the main issue that American urban planning makes public transportation really hard to implement successfully. I'm kinda impressed lol.
The strict zoning laws are stupid for a bunch of reasons. Aside from the obvious ones related to car dependency, it's not good for kids' social lives and excersise, nor social (class) blending. And the US pretends to be very friendly to small businesses, but they're not allowed in those huge zones. And if they were, you'd need a bunch of parking spaces, because the suburbs are so sprawling you can't walk or ride a bike. Everything is just so stupidly stupid, all to push car use (and fuel) and social /class segregation.
@@MrMezmerized Even if the small businesses are set up, they have the desert of parking space around them to match, and the distance from residential areas (and the fact that all the streets are built like high-capacity roads for driving down fast) mean that people will probably drive past you anyway unless they already knew what you were before approaching your (hopefully huge by necessity) sign.
@@natchu96 I was thinking of small businesses within residential areas, or at the edge. Access pretty good and enough people living in the area. But you still have the disadvantage of suburbs being so spread out, and people wanting to drive, even if they could go by bike. The US needs to revert to more mixed zoning with houses, small appartment buildings and small businesses. But I think a lot of people will want to keep the segregation, even though mixing things up a bit will make a more vibrant and connected community.
where to put your bike if you go on a train in europe: Take it with you and (in some places) pay extra for taking up extra room leave it at the train station in a "bike parker" and lock it at home and just walk to the train station as it probably isnt too far away also parking garages are mostly underground (atleast where i am) and mostly aren't visible from above
It depends on where in Europe you live though. I come from a small town in southern Italy and driving a car is essential, as public transport, although it exists, is completely unreliable. I used to live very close to the city center, so I was lucky enough everything I needed was at walking distance, but my office was in the suburbs and man was it hell driving to and from, and finding a parking space was just a nightmare. Five years ago I moved to Munich, and my perspective completely changed. Public transport is very well developed, works efficiently and is reliable, you can easily reach any area of the city. It's expensive, I'll give you that, but nothing compared to the costs that owning a car entails. I only own a bike here, and even though I miss driving a car, I don't miss one at all. I just don't need it.
To answer your question "How do people get to the train station? ": I live in what is considered to be a third-world country in Europe called Bulgaria. We have a very poor but really wide railway web. 1. You get more train stations with big cities 2. You can use all kinds of public transport to get to the station: A. Bus B. Traincar C. Subway 3. You can also rent a bike or e-bike (not so popular yet) 4. You can use your personal bike, there are lots of public bike parkings (ironic, but take a lot less space) 5. You can rent an e-scooter 6. There are really affordable e-cars that you can rent and pay something like $5-$10 for the first 15 minutes (depending on the model) and then you're charged by the minute 7. Of course you can walk to the station as well if it's within a walking distance As you can see there are lots of ways to get to the station and I'm probably missing something since it's currently 1:30AM.
Also huge amount of parking spaces are hidden bellow houses (this is the case mostly for cities) or near malls there are parkings with 2-3 stories, they take smaller space in city but hold a lot of parking spaces
in many rural areas and at the edge of the larger cities so-called park + ride lots at train stations are very common to see; Besides going there by car, these stations are also served by local bus services covering the area
Yes, we use our cars to get to train stations. At central train stations or connection hubs there is an area called "Prak and Ride" to park our cars and travel further along with public transportation. At least in germany for my knowledge.
For the statistics on bikes, the Netherlands, the home of a huge load of bikes, has 17.5 million citizens and 23+ million bikes. Due to high safety standards in its infrastructure, people find it a really good alternative to cycle to work, friends, family, grocery shops etc. It also helps that shops/restaurants are allowed in residential areas, so you can find a grocery store every 3km in rural areas at the least.
As an East European, I heard about the inside joke in Denmark and the Netherlands that if you didn't have a bike as a kid, you were probably neglected by your parents. I mean, it puts into perspective just how common cycling is.
You can absolutely run a train track trough a city without it being annoying. The trains can be undeground or simply so quiet they don't bother anyone. There are footbridges or underpasses to go from one side to another. It's no problem at all :)
1. Yes, many people in Europe own a Car, but far less than the US. You can use your Car to drive to a Trainstation and park it there to continue with a Train, if there is a P&R (Park & Ride) area. 2. If you use a Bike to reach a Trainstation (and you have a ticket for the Bike), you can take it into the Train. There is often an area to place it. 3. Unless you life in Village, public transportation is more or less tightly woven. Busses, Trams, Trains, Subways. But even in the smallest Village, you will find atleast one Busstop. Their schedule isnt good (why sending a Bus to a small village every 30 min, if there arent enough people to use it that often?), maybe 3-4 times a day, but thats still better than having no public transportation. Its complicated. People who move to a village have a Car, partially because there is no good public transportation. But this means it doesn't pay off to schedule more Busses to that Village, since so many people have a Car. I tried to get a license^^ That was over 15 years ago. The times i would have really needed a car so far is not even 2 digits.
"Where would you put your bike?" Well depending on it being just a shopping trip, a 1-3 day visit or a week or longer trip you would do different things. - shopping trip: there are spaces with room for leaving your bike with these metal thingys to "park" your bike at. It helps the bike staying upright even in windy conditions. 1-3 days: train stations in medium to bigger cities often have closed in accommodation you can rent cheap for your bike to prevent it being stolen or just not out in the open for the elements. - A week or longer: same as the 1-3 days, but at this point you probably have some bagge for your trip so you may end up taking the bike with you(yes that very much is an option with spaces in most trains accommodating this) or you get a friend or family member to drop you of at the station. I grew up in a very small city, just on the inside of the city border, but only had about 3km to the train and 1km to the nearest bus stop. In highschool i took my bike to school everyday. For me it was only 10km, some of my classmates had 16-18km. I guess it also has to do with a diffrent mentality. Some of my classmates lived close to the school, shopping districts and any groceri stores, so the idea of walking more than 500 meters to get anywhere was afronting to them, and no longer than mabye 5km on bike to get anywhere was the same. In comparison anyone living on a farm or outskirts of a smaller city, was very used to longer disdences. I personally take the bus or train if there are longer than 20km between home and school/workplace/friends & family/club meetups, but that's just me
10:44 both on bikes and healthy people: The is a great channel that’s called not just bikes, which is a channel focused on the differences of street and general city design. It is run by someone who is originally from London Canada. You should really check him out.
Check out the vids of "Not just bikes" he perfectly talks about the differences between NA cities and European ones - also about the Bike-Train combo you wondered about!
Where I am from yes some people takes the car to the trainstation and have their car parked at "communters parking". Mostly happens in more rural areas where the public transportation has fewer departures and take much longer time then driving the car. However it also happens that people that live and work close to eachother pool up and use one car at the time and split the cost of gas.
during high school we had a somewhat social experiment in my city. A group of students that would divide up and get to a destination while using different transport, while abiding all the laws (no jaywalking, speeding or biking in a walking zone etc.). The bike was the fastest followed by the tram, the walker, motorbike, the car and finally the bus. The bus was last due to frequent stops whilst having to wait for it for long. The car and motorbike essentially got there at the same time but due to being able to pass cars up front sooner, the motorbike got there first. The walker (more like the speed walker) got there quickly because he could cut so much of the distance just going through parks and stuff, the bike also had that pleasure, for most of it that's why he got there the fastest. The tram guy got there pretty fast too because trams are innately faster in traffic than regular cars and have fewer obstructions.
Just some random answers to Ryan's doubts and questions: - You can drive the bike to the train station, there are parking lots for bikes, but you sometimes can get your bike or e-bike ON the train. There are some places on the train for the bikes on regional/local train (not the ones going to 320km/h) and have also the recharge plugs for free. - About parking for bikes, you can have also am app-driven closed box to put your bike into, with recharge point. So you can got o work while your bike recharge the battery. - About distances from stations. I live near a little fisherman village on the coast. I have a train station at 800 meters from me, and another at 1200 meters on the other side. I live between two near villages. Obviously this is not valid for all Europe, but can be representative of some of our countries. My aunt lives to 20km from the nearest town and the car is essential. - About pedestrian only areas. Most of the big cities have one or more pedestrian area in which cars are prohibited or restricted to necessity only. If you're moving, you can ask city administration a permit to park a truck under your home valid just for the hour you need it. - We have malls built just to "copy" America and feel international", but we don't really need them, our malls are our city streets. Every neighborhood has the most common kind stores and shops, if you want a specific brand you can go into the center of city or town, which often is a specific street or square, where the fanciest shops usually are. Biggest cities have biggest centers, sometimes more than one. Often those centers have this qualification since medieval times. The city hall can have 500 years still being the most representative and prestigious building of the town. Even little village have often a central square or street.
I am 20 years old and I have never driven, I have always been able to go anywhere by public transport, one of the things I like most about being European is that
12:40 😮 Wow, in the Netherlands typically any road allowing cars over 18 mph the vulnerable cyclist gets separated into protected bike paths. Not just lanes, proper separated paths. Some rural roads allow shared usage, those have speed limits of 37 mph. Anything above that is off limits for cyclists and generally has bike infrastructure even more separated from the high speed road. And yes these bike paths still allow us to traverse the entire country without fearing for our safety.
"where do you put your bike?"
"How do you get to the train station?"
I can't even describe how strange those questions sound to me (a European) lol
la population européenne ne vit pas que dans des villes. j'habite en France, en campagne. la gare la plus proche est à 15-20km donc la question ce pose.
In US you nearly cannot survive without a car in many cities... it's sad TBH.
@@preventiondechets1767 oui mais en France c'est tout a fait possible de conduire sa voiture vers la gare et se garer. Ou utiliser son vélo, qui est mieux. Donc, oui, ce sont des questions un peut drôles
@@preventiondechets1767 mais ca normal que si tu vis loin de la gare tu va conduire la avant se montrer sur train, c'est plus ecologique que conduire pour la toute route, par example a Varsovie si t'as un billet pour le metro tu peux parker pres de la station du metro gratuit et puis tu jusque prendre le metro
Same for me as a dutch person! We have giant (underground) places to park your bike.
"Where would you put your bike" That was so American it was adorable xD
Made me laugh too :-)
Yeah, finding someplace to put your bike is so much easier than finding somewhere to park your car. Just use a good bike lock and you’re good, at least where I live
Every central train station in The Netherlands has a parking garage for bikes, with Utrecht central station being the largest, having room for 12500 bikes. None of them have a parking garage for cars though
In some countries, like in Romania, it is a concern that people would steal your bike or some parts of it. Romania doesn't really have a good bicycle culture yet, although there is some progress.
And you can always take your bike on the train. It is not only useful to get from your home to the station, but also from the station at the destination to wherever you'll want to go.
I'm from Germany and it is so interesting to see things from another perspective. It really helps to remind myself that we all live in our small bubbles. thank you :)
Oh and - one reason why our transportation system is not perfect:
The trains are alway AND I MEAN ALWAYS late ;-;
Wow! I lived in Germany 32 years ago and you could set your watch by the trains and buses. I guess times have changed.
Deutsche Bahn is a desaster 😅
So true german trains are a disaster
Or they get cancelled or drive off from another Plattform number (like every dann time I'm in berlin)
an Austrian student who came to study in my french school said the biggest obstacle on his travel was the DeutschBahn... But yall prices for the same trains are better than french ones, so I still prefer Deutschbahn to go to Germany X)
Busses drive you to the train stations in Europe, so you don't have to run a train track through a village or city. We have busses in the smallest towns so people can still get around. And yes, you can also drive your bike to the train station. There are special stalls where you can safely put your bike.
In our town we have 3 bus stops not even 3 minutes (bus drive) apart from each other, I could walk to the next stop within 5 minutes. Being on the opposite end of town from the train station (10 minute walk) it's nice to have the bus in order to get there to get to school, even if I could get there within a reasonable time by foot! I'm very happy with our train/bus system in Europe (specifically germany) even if there's a small delay every now and then
@shar4803 exactly, in my miniature town, we also have like 5 or 6 bus stops with 5 minute walks apart. The bus that goes through the town passes 2 or 3 other towns and goes directly to a train station. From that train station you can go through the whole Netherlands, with 2 trains you can go from South to North
@@dennis_nl7587 Yeah like from ours it's a half an hour drive to the next one, connecting us to the rest of Germany and we could even drive (directly) to Paris. American train systems genuenly baffel me
Or you take your bike on the train. I know like a gazillion people who ride a foldable bike for that purpose.
What are you talking about?
Most major European cities I've been to have subways or trams that take you to the train stations.
Or both!
But I guess You could take a bus too. If you wanna be miserable and get there SLOWLY!
As a European, seeing someone worry over how they'd get to the train station is kinda funny. My logical response is "just take the bus/tram/troley?" cause at least my area is very well connected, and the idea of not having any form of public transit within walking distance just does not compute!
Wyoming is 3% bigger than the UK and has a population that is 116 times smaller than the UK. What kind of public transportation do you think that place should have? The entire Midwest is pretty much like that. big city's defiantly need public transportation, but the rest of the country is way too big for it.
The population of Wyoming is 578,000 population of the uk is 67 million
Like you said , if you have no Car then you still have a combined Bus and Metro System . People also cycle .you can even take your Bicycle on to public transport .though some times of the day cycles are not allowed on public transport at peaktimes .also bicycles can be taken on regional trains and some inter City trains .basically you do not need a car in most central European countries.
@John Spooner you got to remember that Europe is just as big as the USA, but not the population density is 143 people per square mile while America is 34 people per square mile. Rember about the same size, just almost 5x population density. They need it more than we do not that we don't the big city's really do need it
@@yodafloats9090 An interconnected rail network joining the towns and cities, with buses joining smaller ? You don't _all_ need to travel from one end of Wyoming to the other daily - surely?
48% of all USA car journeys are less than 3 miles; 20% are under *_one_* mile!
I mean, do you people not have legs or something?! 🤣
@Vatican Cameos I'm not walking 3 miles to somewhere in -20 degrees whether let alone in spring or fall. But most of town in the us are more rural/ urban areas we git huge areas to cross with few Busses. It whould never be profitable for companies to do buss rutes there just in the big city's. Would it be nice ya but but not supper practical. Look up the cannon ball rum it's from NY to Los Angeles. The record is like 24 hours Long with Average speed to 110 mph that's a high speed train speed and the fact it would take 24 hours Is something, I would rather just fly that distance in like 6- 7 hours instead.
There are "park-and-ride" schemes in europe, where you drive your car or bike to a train or tram station to take public transport in the cities. Secure parking facilities for both cars and bikes are indeed provided at these places.
And they are often more inexpensive then parking options in the city. Its like 2 Euros for the whole day
Toronto and other major cities in Canada have kiss and ride schemes! With some parking options.
We add love to your commute!
Stay safe, stay sane, stay strong Ukraine 🇺🇦
@@bastik.3011 In more rural areas - close to cities - here in Germany there are often free P&R parking places.
Many now have park and ride on the outskirts near to highway interchanges served by metro, tram or bus systems into the city centre. Often the parking is free when you buy a day transit ticket
@@dirkspatz3692 yeah aslong as you have a Train ticket i think. Our SBahn Station has free Parking to i think
I live in Madrid and you'd genuinely be surprised by how easy it is to travel through the whole city without a car only with the Metro (subway) and any bus. And this is only 8€ for as many uses as you want for a whole MONTH for people under 26yo I think. Also I think it'd interesting for an American citizen to see how interrail works in Europe, I did one with my friends this year and it seemed unimaginable to travel so much distance (8 countries) without the possibility to take some kind of public transportation since we just couldn't have a car
Madrid nuevo norte for the win 👍👍
Since retiring, I've spent some time travelling through Europe. It is almost sickening to come back to the USA to see how badly we have designed society. Many in Europe have shared car for out of town weekend trips, etc. They don't need one daily but the sharing gives them freedom. I've traveled extensively for a month at a time and rented a car only once each trip for an overnight excursion to some really remote destination. Mass transit is so easy, practically taking you from door to door with the mix of trains, subways, trams & busses. And all inclusive transportation passes are super affordable, no comparison to the expense of a car.
it a continent vs on country why are u disappointed
its nice to have, but I I would prefer cheapers cars, gas and more space. its nice to not need a parking lot in a big city, but I dont care about living in a city. I want to enjoy my car, and have my space, and make my own schedule.
move to america @@sshreddderr9409
@@sshreddderr9409 And then you get huge obesity rates, almost no public spaces, food deserts, ecology deterioration.
And the cherry on the cake. You don't even realise how much time do you waste because 1 - everything is so far away, 2 - Cars are slover and I'm not counting in the time to park, maintain it or traffic jams. Berlin - München: 6 hours by car, 4 hours by train. One more thing is safety, (US - 120 death per million, EU - 40)
Also, prices. I pay 49€ (53$) per month to use all types of public transportation in Germany, except DB. But all subways, buses, sbahns and even ferries are included.
As a non car owner in the UK. It’s extremely easy to travel almost anywhere I like using Train and then Bus. The cost of travel isn’t too bad and it’s almost stress free compared to driving. It’s great! Apart from when there’s cancellations and strikes… which is often.
Im British living in Bulgaria - the transport here is just amazing. Flat rate 70p for any length of but trip on brand new battery electric busses.
Even the remote villages get 1 bus an hour to the city and where I live its every 7 minuts
Am in Berlin, Germany and get mad when I have to wait for more than 5 mins for the train 😂. At night you usually have to wait around 15min for a train. Buses can take longer like 10-30min. And ofc there are frequent delays. Also I don't have a driver license and prob will never get one
similiar here in lisbon, i stoped even bringing the car while im living in the city, another thing that reduces traffic( we call it trafego, i know this m8 sound other thing to tother languages ) is alot of services people dont need to go to the local, alot actually can be used or called online, medics, social services, assurance, even most time i dont go to the market store they come to me :) and every corner we have bakeries, local markets barbers, pet clinics etc, just need a small 1 minute walk, and both subway and train station is a 5 to 7 minutes walk at max.
That's fine if you're travelling within a big city or from one big city to another in the UK: not so good as soon as you get out of the principal urban areas and especially so in the rural areas. Even if you live in a non-metropolitan town, you may find that there are few or no evening services. Public transport in Britain is very patchy and journeys may involve unwanted detours and numerous changes and take a very long time as a result. Buses are often late or do not turn up and when that fact is coupled with infrequency and discomfort in bad weather, many people avoid them.
I use real-time timetables on the internet and there will often be a countdown to a bus, only for the tracing for that bus to disappear entirely when it is overdue and the next bus one hour later to show as the next one.
And you guys share a hobby with us Germans. Although the train service is on average pretty okay compared to the rest of the (non-European) world, you like to complain about it :)
6:58 its the perfect example for what goes wrong with north america’s car centric society. When thinking about how to get somewhere you immediately think about going there by car, its the default option - no questions asked. But when thinking about taking the bike you wonder were to put your BIKE… I think its hilarious considering the differences in effort to creating car parking spaces compared to cycle stands…
Wyoming is 3% bigger than the UK and has a population that is 116 times smaller than the UK. What kind of public transportation do you think that place should have? The entire Midwest is pretty much like that. big city's defiantly need public transportation, but the rest of the country is way too big for it.
@@yodafloats9090 that doesn‘t excuse the “limited” perspective about the topic at hand in the population. One should still consider cycling if it’s a viable option.
@Peter W. true
I mean it’s not profitable to connect a small town to another small town. Americans don’t go out of their town or city often
@@peterw.8434 well American cities are so spread out that biking just isn’t an option for most trips Americans go on. It’s too late to save America at this point. It won’t be profitable anymore to put public transit in the Midwest because Americans don’t go out of their town or state often and most Americans drive as their first thought
As a person from Czechia this part 11:20 was taken for granted but watching This i realised how much free space we have for walking in EU
hi, dutchie here. we have a very dense railnetwork were in a lot of routes there are trains leaving about every fifteen minutes (to the same destination). virtually every trainstation is also a busstop, making it very easy to take the bus to the trainstation. and if you have ever seen the photo's of our bike-parking spaces, they are not photoshopped, and biking is indeed very popular here, so that is also a way to get there. some people take their car to the trainstation, simply because parking in some of the larger (and older) cities is not only difficult, ,but also more expensive than taking the train. it probably helps that the Netherlands are one of the most densely populated countries, everything is pretty close together.
Loved railroad on Netherland❤️ almost second time accurancy
" Most people in Europe own a car , though ..." - I actually got rid of my car six months ago - and I am surprised at how "relaxed" I am when I get home from work after an hour on the train compared to 90 minutes in heavy car traffic.
I go home in 30 minutes by a tram and by a car I would spend 90 minutes! (because of car traffic) I love trams
And don’t forget you can read, listen to Musik, do homework (done that so often as a student) etc while getting transported. Not possible whilst driving a car
@@piau1798 Or sleep 😅
I bought myself a car when I started a new job, cus by train it was 60+ minutes and by car 20 minutes, and I live and work in a major city in Germany. But individual anecdotes don't tell much, studies does. A study say that car is much faster most times, even with traffic included. But that's why you have both in Europe, car and public traffic.
@@Delibro Depends. I refuse to own a car, because I live in a centre of a big city in Europe and know from experience how much time it takes to move from one street to another by car (most often it is faster to just walk which is absurd in itself). And it's not anegdotal, it's as obvious to everyone as the sun rising on the East. So, every time my family visits me, I had to include them being late at least half an hour, despite knowing it would take less without a car. The most efficient and fast transportation you can get to commute in a big city is a combination of tram/train/metro and electric kickscooter. That's a jackpot combination. Only when you need to move long distances form village to village the car would be much more efficient.
Greetings from Europe! I am very much impressed by how intelligent your questions and comments actually were and how you strike the perfect balance between what is the ideal and what is actually realistically possible to achieve. Very nice video, keep the good job!
It is worth mentioning that Germany is kind of different from rest of the Europe. They don't have that big cities, more like lots of medium sized cities with sourounding suburbs looking like small villages. Motorway system called AutoBahn is fantastic and THERE ARE NO SPEED LIMITS. When german person says that his job is 40 minutes away it actually may be 60 miles away because once on motorway it is pedal to the metal. Great fun for car driving.
Well, not all of the Autobahn is without speedlimit. Most of all there is one. And nowadays there is a discussion about having a general speedlimit, what is highly needed.
I can understand this situation better than others.
I live in Europe, but in a poor region (Sicily, southern Italy).
Here, a car is a must. Public transport are still not a very attractive option.
But.
I went to work to northern Italy for five months.
I went there with my car, thinking I would need it sometime.
No. I didn't.
I had to go to my car and turn it on weekly just to not make the battery die.
Because the public transports were so well designed and cost-effective that actually driving the car was a loss of time and money.
Now there are big investments to enhance public transports in my city, and I like the design that was announced. I am looking forward to use them in the future. Maybe I won't need to own a car at all.
Però onestamente avere la macchina è meglio.
Puoi andare dove vuoi all'ora che vuoi, e non ti devi sorbire tutti gli zozzi e i ladri che trovi sui mezzi pubblici.
Già in Toscana, parlando dell'area urbana di Firenze, Prato e Pistoia, dopo il tramonto sei a piedi.
Fuori dai centri urbani poi non c'è alternativa. E non conviene neanche averla, per l'uso che se ne farebbe costerebbe troppo e non sarebbe versatile. È più semplice avere mezzi propri.
Certo, forse in alcuni grandi centri urbani magari conviene potenziare i mezzi pubblici e conviene dare il più possibile la possibilità a chi viene da fuori città di poter lasciare l'auto fuori dalle mura e di spostarsi coi mezzi pubblici.
Non a caso a Roma ci sono gli autobus notturni, avendo un turismo e una vita notturna importanti se lo possono permettere.
+antoniodario... In the south of Italy public transport a catastrophy. The time tables are completely arbitrary. From Cosenza to Lecce you need a whole day although it's only 150 km - that's the distance I did (once) on rollerskates! So I'm as fast on Rollerskates than an Italian train in the south.
@@svenlima Salerno-Reggio Calabria has improved drastically in recent years.
Let's hope we will be able to see the rest becoming at least "decent" in the next years.
I live in Basel, Switzerland. There are actual studies here that show, that the fastest way to get from any point in the city to another is actually by bike. Followed by public transport of course. Cars aren't even allowed to drive in the large parts of the inner city.
Yeah, public transit is kinda meh in the European countryside (even in Germany, which damn well should have the money for good public transport). It usually gets you to the biggest city in the region in acceptable time (and from there to other large cities), but if you want to go anywhere else, you're SoL. And long distance train tickets are still often twice as expensive as taking the car, even with the high taxes on gasoline.
Our railway system used to be good up to the 90s, but nowadays it's rapidly approaching American levels.
I live in Warsaw. Within 10min walk I have: a huge shopping center, another two grocery stores, gas station, pool, metro station, two bus stations, church, vet, dentist and probably millions other places you usually don’t visit often. I’m not kidding.
To get to work I simply walk to the bus stop that is 100m away from my apartment. And the drive time is exactly 12minutes.
I have been to US twice. I love this country, awesome people, beautiful nature, great memories. But the transportation system SUCKS, there is so many things wrong with it that I don’t know where to start.
Just let me tell one thing. I lived in some kind of residential area where nearest shop was 15minutes away BY CAR.
yeah, every metropolitan city has that mate, nothing new. Ever been to NYC? you have everything within 5-minute walk as well... But the roads freaking suck in EU. So 5 minute walk is like 20 minute drive there. US if its 5 minute walk its 3 minute drive XD.
So you were in a low density area and expected shops?
@@lecoureurdesbois86 I live in a low density area, I have everything I need in my village. And even a train station, with trains which go to the main lines every hour.
So yeah, I do expect at least shops tbh, even if they're small
@@yushkovyaroslavThe thing is European infrastructure is based around pedestrians, whereas the US is mainly focused on car infrastructure, which is why the US has massive roads and wider cars, whereas Europe has smaller roads and therefore cars
@@thecursedgalleon7096 nope. it's not focused on anything it was build when there were no cars and mainly build "as the horses went" and horses go randomly. They had no design and clue what they were doing. (Only Germany changed that design during 1900s because they were desperately trying to get ahead of all of Europe, and it worked. for all the wrong reasons) Having straight roads is best for cars and pedestrians, as its 100 times easier to navigate. You can go anywhere in the city without a gps in US and in EU you can only do it if you lived there for years since the roads designs make absolutely no sense.
The reason it even matters is not only that its more comfortable and less of a pain, but also that it is a logistic nightmare to do large scale operations anywhere in EU if it's not Germany. If any EU country had even 25% of US logistics it would collapse on itself because of its road infrastructure that is littered with unnecessary things, roadblocks, over complicated turns, illogical pathing, extra milage roads that go around instead of through an area, illogical spacing, and most importantly no logical design whatsoever. (Talking about in cities, the highways are actually really well designed in most areas) There is nothing good about it in the modern world. If people like the infrastructure and design of EU cities that is one thing, but the roads is a vital organ of a country's logistics and anyone who is worth anything understands that its very unfortunate that EU ended up like this due to its early historic success. Similar to US adapting the imperial system and is unable to change it now even though it makes absolutely no sense. But as time goes by and economies continue to grow this has too and will be changed, but current generation will not live to see it, most likely.
11:02 That part is not strictly accurate. The free travel is due to the Schengen agreement, which includes more countries than just the EU members.
And you can spend more time than 90 days in the so called area of freedom
Im from austria, i live in Vienna. We own 1 Car for 2 people, but use it maybe once a month. We used to live in the Countryside too where we both needed a car on a daily basis, because there was only 1 train and 1 bus (the bus came only at 6am and in the evening, in 4 years living there i havent seen that bus even once) So yes.. you still need a car when you live in the countryside. but the nearer you are to the city the better the public transortation becomes.
The difference is just that European cities were built long before cars were invented. Some cities are 2000 years old, but most at least a 1000 years or so. In South East France, at the Italian border, where I live, the landscape is rather steep towards an amazing coastline, and villages were built with steps leading further up. There are steps everywhere. These were built hundreds of years ago. Now a fancy city like Monaco has ajusted to this by building lifts next to the steps. So you do not need a car at all.
Well but tbf American cities also weren’t build around cars. There are good photos on the internet where you can see many cities 80 years ago. They were TRANSFORMED to be car cities. Like the video mentioned in America many homes were destroyed to build highways. Even to day they do this. Same for the Netherlands. When you go back 80 years you will see that the cities arnt build around bikes. It was as car centric as any another European city but they transformed it to be one. Boston is a great example where they didn’t destroy the whole city just for highways and parking lots.
@@Fabii2000 When there weren't many cars, Europe was also more car focused. It was more difficult do do (also because of the history - you won't destroy a church that has 1000 years in order to build a road). Nowadays the EU promotes alternatives to cars.
@@Fabii2000 well America did this because at the time, cars seemed so modern and these highways were meant to help with transportation between cities. Most European cities were still focused on rebuilding after WW2 and also wanted to preserve their cities
a chariot is bigger than a car and it craps everywhere
@@incaseofimportantnegotiations i'd like a chariot ride to work and back and crap at them peasants i have to work with (that's a joke lads, don't take this seriously!)
Driving to the train station is an actual thing by the way. It’s called Park and Ride and is usually done outside of cities so that you don’t have to find parking in city itself but rather just outside where there is more space for parking
P+R is a nice thing and it can work, because in Europe, we have public transport.
@@bzs187 Okay? You say that like relying on government to move around makes you "better"? It actually makes you a slave.
@@brandondavis7777 you're funny... Brainwashed, but funny.
@@brandondavis7777 Wao... Did not expect this for sure. They don't make me a slave. If I can park my car at the city border and use public transportation to move around, without sitting in the traffic jam for hours. I will park my car, because I can use my legs and there is a good alternative. Yet, I fail to see the slavery in this and many more millions who would love to have alternative for a car.
@@damionlee7658 That's some adorable projection. Typical of your kind, though
The guy from Not Just Bikes explaines it really well. Since road need major maintenance every 25 years it gives the city the option to redesign the road. City planners can make different choices to include bicycle lanes that are seperate from the roads. Add mixed zoning laws and you wouldn''t need to drive 10 miles to the grocery store. I live in a small town and i have four grocery stores within half a mile. Don't need a car just to buy food.
@6:58 "I guess you could ride your bike to the train, but where do you put it".
The Netherlands: Hold my beer.
The map at 0:35 shows maybe about 5% of the network in europe. It must have been reduced to some main connections that cross borders or so. The map itself is doing a horrible job at showing the actual density of the network. And the narrator even describes this totally simplified and thinned out map as incredibly dense and there are almost no areas without coverage. Oh man. And the road network at 4:34 where he probably means Interstates and major highways is even worse. I am sorry but this guy keeps comparing apples with oranges and it's funny
Exactly. You can't stress it enough that the actual rail and road networks in Europe are way, way, way more dense than presented in the original video. The maps look like some sort of joke to me.
I was sooo annoyed by that too!
It is actually a map of the interrail. A rail for countries around the EU and just international
But still, it's merely a simplified artistic map they use on their website but has nothing to do with the actual train network. There is no such thing as "the interrail". It's a ticket, not a network.
At 4:34 its definetly major highways or cross-country highways.
Ryan being tricked by himself just made my day
yeah, its his own fault he forgot the difference between EU and Europe :D
I love how he looked up what the mph was in kph and not the other way around
in germany those roades where people are just walking are called "fußgängerzone" and they are in the older parts of cities so the houses dont get dmgd etc
I am 33 years old, grew up in Sweden and now living in Hungary, traveled to Finland, Denmark, Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Greece and Spain to name a few. I dont have a drivers license and only used public transportation. Okay, I have cheated a few times and taken a cab but Its less than 10 times.
The cab is still public transportation so I would not call it cheating.
@@tomasbriceno2319 its not really public tho since you are a private customer and there are no strangers inside the cab besides the driver who you are paying
@@Jay-tv2lz It's public since the user does not own the car and each car is used by many people. Also cabs (at least in Europe) are regulated by either the gobernment or the municiplaty, even if they are not owned by public agencies.
We can argue abut carsharing services where you drive a hired car or about private unregulated services like Uber and Cabify, since these are a bit outside those rules. However, taxi services, at least in Spain (my country) and most European contries I've been to are considered public transportation.
I only ever take a cab in the night when there is no train service in my home town. Last train arrives around 1 in the night and first one is around 5:30. Had to do that maybe twice in my life. Usually its easier to just sleep over at a friends place if I go out in a city.
Also dont have a drivers license in my 30s. My girlfriend thinks its a bit weird but I just cant be bothered to pay about 3000 euro just to get a piece of paper that says I can drive when I dont want or need to own a car. Would be useful for emergencies but then I can just call a cab and it saves a lot of money not owning a car.
If my girlfriend comes over I usually call her a cab from the train station, it costs me 20-30 euro which is expensive but I can easily afford that out of the 500 euro a month I dont spend on car ownership.
Actually, there are a lot of places where the train goes through a neighborhood. This usually happens when the cities grow, and the new suburbia gets built along the rail. You usually can find smaller stations similar to bus stops too, so the people who live there have an easy access to travel. Also, most people in Europe don't necessarily need a car (or even a bike) for the daily life, because public transportation can usually manage the work commuters, and if you need groceries or something, there are small shops everywhere, within a 5-10 minute distance. And when I say 5-10 minute, I mean on foot, not with a car.
I definitely have to disagree on the point we don't need cars. I live in germany and in the countryside (still one of the better connected rural areas though) and you most definitely need a car here. Public transport is great in the larger cities but not in the countryside. For my last job I had to drive about 30 minutes or alternatively (but not really) I could take the bus the evening before, sleep at a random busstop and take another bus for the last stretch. There was literally no other way to be at my place of work at 8am. Busses and trains leve here about every few hours. But they won't take you everywhere and on weekends or after like 9pm you're stuck. And did I mention about 70% of busses only go on school days?
@@vrenelimeyer2856 Most people do live in cities or close to cities, though. And with a combination of bike and bus/train, really, most people could manage.
@@viomouse hey not sure about it. I mean, many people don´t need a car if they live and work in same city, but still you have some scenarios where car is better option. Traveling long distance to some village is one of them, transporting bigger things, and even going for trip or hike. Many people have car, like their car, but they use it sensible, so they dont go into the center of city with it, they dont commute every day with it, they just know when car makes sense
@@Desperoro Yes, I agree on the transporting bigger things or travelling to farout countryside villages. But unfortunately I see the problem that most people don't use their car in a sensible way. People have a car and then use it for everything, also for travelling into a nearby city center. And then there is the thing of having multiple cars in a family which often times is nothing but luxury. With this thoughtless use of a car, they provide perfect targets for the anti-car political campaigns. I'm pro car but I urge people think to what to use it for, and maybe use public transportation or bikes and such in a complementary way.
yep because ppl lives in downtown and there are shops on the 0 floors and apartments/ condos on the top, so sometimes you just go downstairs to do your groceries , buy books, clothes, at small cities like mine ( 35.000 inhabitants) there's no culture of a mall where all shops are there together.
The yellow lines you see are just the main rail routes. There are many more regional rail routes in Europe, but they are all connected to the main rail routes. When I was younger I loved to travel all over Germany by train. When you travel by train you see a lot more of Germany than when you take the autobahn. On the Autobahn you have to concentrate on driving and on the train you can look out the window and take in the scenery. I have also travelled to other countries by train, such as France, Switzerland, Poland, the Netherlands and Austria. Most EU countries belong to the Schengen area, so travelling is very easy because there are no more border controls. Although Norway is not part of the EU, but it is a member of the Schengen area because the EU has signed an association agreement with Norway. The only exception is the Norwegian island of Svalbard as this island is not part of the Schengen area. Svalbard is also very complicated from a legal point of view, as Norway shares sovereignty over Svalbard with Russia. This contract between Norway and Russia over Svalbard is very old. Iceland is also not a member of the EU but is part of the Schengen area. The EU has also concluded an association agreement with Iceland. However, Switzerland has overdone it because it has signed so many treaties with the EU that it can enjoy all the benefits of the EU without being a member. Many Europeans don't think that's great.
Well... actualy these are not even the main ones, because some routes appear on this map and don't exist IRL (ex : Lyon-Bordeaux in France). So yes there are way more than on this map BUT this map isn't even accurate regarding the main routes. I don't know where they took their information but it's quite wrong.
@@noefillon1749 That map shows just the European Union planning for *major* corridors inside Europe for 2030!!!! Completely false as of 2023!
And that's only for major corridors, but not at all for the *HUGE* infrastructure currently active. For example in Spain there are 18,000 km of highways and 4,000 km of High Speed Railways, along with the old 280,000 km of conventional roads. And that's just a tenth (10%) of all European transport network!!!!!!!
American here, I have a similar story to yours (commonly traveling) and can recognize the fun of it, but as an American, we don’t really have that many trains like the video says, though the video only mentions a single railroad company, unfortunately the videos correct on the whole car thing and that’s where I regret this country’s infrastructure, it’s not that much fun to ride in cars for hours when traveling, so I would rather have their infrastructure
You take piblic transports, like bus or tramway to the train station, it doesn't suck because it is also cheap and mostly efficient.
fun fact: where i live, we have at least 8 parking locations scattered throughout the city(4 or 5 in the city centre), all either stacked up in the silhouette of the other buildings in the block or simply underground. theres very little genuine parking lots anywhere, most of them are either just a line of lots along the street side or 10-30 spaces per shop if theyre a little further from the centre.
The parking garages also charge by the hour which gives people an incentive not to drive their cars into the cities. In Amsterdam parking can cost up to 10 euro per hour. Better to park at a train or metro station outside the city and take the train to the city center.
One of my Uni profesor told us. "The easiest way to tell if a country is truly developed and not pretending, they must have more public transportation than cars."
Thats idiotic
I can guarantee you that every single country on Earth has more cars than busses and trains
@@lecoureurdesbois86By that, he meant it like that taking a PT is more common than going by a car
@@lecoureurdesbois86 now factor in the CAPACITY of those buses and trains, and compare again?
It's not convenient for all situations.
Public transportation works in big cities with lots of tourists and night life, where you can run it at every hour and still gain from it.
Outside the downtown of the main touristic cities it just isn't convenient.
It costs way less, both in price and in enviromental impact, to have private vehicles rather than have an efficient public transportation that can satisfy everyone, if in most places you have to move around just a bunch of people in a span of hours.
If you want to go to European cities then I advise you to take the parking lot in front of the city and take the rest of the way by bus or train. Finding a parking space in the city can be a big task.
And expensive. When I'm going with my RV I use a campsite and the get a day pass which often is less expensive then parking for 3 hours in the city.
Working in the (my) inner city is nearly impossible by car. Most of the area is only 3h parking (for about 2€/h) if you don't live there. And you still need to find a free spot. Parking houses are even more expensive. Parking lots are very rare.
Which is by design. Parking lots create distance. However it is density that improves people's lives (having all nessesarry stores close). And also businesses (having plenty of customers).
@@iamcurious9541 And a lot of it is simple history and not killing everything of it. In the 60ies there were car centric changes but not to that extent as in the US. And of course not in the old parts of the cities if they survived the war.
And there often is just no place for parking lots and ground is expensive. Apart from parking houses there is only one open parking lot in the center of my town which has only about 20-30 spots. And of course some at the side of the roads.
Depends on the city, just like in America, Asia, etc
It's not necessary to leave it in front of the cities, in most cities you can find parking spots for days in residential areas. And from there there's usually like a 5-10 minute walk to the city center.
And again it depends which city it is, if it's München or Bucharest at rush hour we're talking about then you might not find parking spots even on the edge of the city.
the train 7:06 is from switzerland (sbb = schweizer bundes bahn) and in my opinion the best train system in europe (im from switzerland and know really well how they look like). fun fact in switzerland travelling with train is faster than with a car cause of speed limit 120 km/h and the pretty good job of sbb
you make great content, keep it up!💪
11:31 YES that‘s one of the best parts of European city centers. In Germany, these roads are called „Fußgängerzone“ (pedestrian zone) and can be pretty big, like several blocks.
Wait, pedestrian zones are not a thing in the US!?
@@Zure619 in the US, the only "pedestrian zones" that i can think of, are malls, where as in europe they dedicate entire parts of a city to be pedestrian zones.
i hate it, because it's usually a huuuge block of concrete without any plants, grass or anything.
@@Zure619 There's kinda no point when you physically won't get anywhere useful on foot most of the time...
@@georgwarhead2801 in Gent starting from the nineties, goed city goverment because there was a huge resistance! especially from shops !
in the end, shops did way better, EXCEPT those that selled really big things like electronics and such, those have been pushed away.
you need a special licence if you really need to be there to be allowed in :).
and it contains the biggest part of the historic mediaval city center, so busy that they started a few years ago to forbid cycling in 2 busy shopping street on saterday between the usually pretty busy hours ;).
I took the train from New York City to Williamsburg Virginia once - about 400 miles. It took 11 hours. (scheduled for about 8 hours) Same distance from London to Edinburgh is scheduled at about 4 1/2 hours.
London to Edinburgh (Waverley) by train: distance of around 332 miles (534 km). 4h 10m on the fastest services. That's 83mph or 133 kph. It's slow by European standards. French TGV Paris-Bordeaux: 2h03mn for a 630 km long travel.
@@verttijineu2776 Only 332 miles? I took the distance from Google maps, but that was by road. I know it's slow compared to high speed lines in Europe but compared to Amtrak it's like teleporting!
@@verttijineu2776 TGV and ICE are still bit of an exception. If you would look on something like Open Railway Map, then most of the lines are build for much lower speed.
Just get a car
@@raybishop1130 if I recall, you were closer at 400, the railway from London Kings Cross to Edinburgh Waverley is something like 392 miles.
"Where do you put the bike"
Well, in the train.
In newer trains, there are dedicated spaces for bikes, not a lot, but there are, and beside, there are few people that go to the train station with a bike, so that checks out.
For the older trains, well, it's simple actually.
If there are older trains in your line, it means there are fewer people that takes it, so there is a *LOT* of space in the train, put your bike wherever.
I live in the middle of fuckall in France, when I need to take the train, it's always almost empty even a peak hours
Also, if you don't see any parking garage on the surface, it means they are underground.
The biggest town near where I live is Metz, and *ALL* the public parking space is underground, in huge multi-level garages that are secure, cheap, easy to access, in key points (center of the town, underneath malls, landmarks, etc...) and *numerous*
You get the best of both worlds, beautiful rustic cities and space for your car. Win-win
Thanks ryan for appreciating its midweek but have a great week enjoyed as allways
There are actually places at many, if not most, train stations in Europe where you can put and lock up your bike. Some of them are public and free to use, for some you have to pay (which have higher security), and I have seen that at some stations you can even rent a spot inside of a secure area to leave your bike there on a regular basis, e.g. when you have to go to work by train.
Or if you live in the uk and don’t want some chav/pikey liking your wheels just bring it with you
as a dutch person who uses the train daily: we bike to the station and theres bike parking lots (well racks, lots of em) at the station. and then we have another "station bike" (aka run down bike that we all buy 2nd hand for a few bucks, most likely stolen but we dont care) to bike further. but also loads of steps and skateboard users take theit mode of transport with them on the train.
Every duch person got five bikes. One in the canal. One stolen. One on his boat. One at home. And one he is searching for
@@co_lo4883 there is a quite similar phrase (without the boat thing) in the german city called Münster xD
Why you need a station bike when you drove to the station with your other bike and lock it there?
@@Delibro 2nd bike is at the station to ride to work /school
Or, as many Dutch people nowadays do, rent a public transit bike at the destination station! :)
For non-dutch people, YES! we have "public transit" bikes haha. They're basically just rental bikes, except we use our public transit passes to rent them and they get billed as part of public transit journeys, making renting those bikes much less of a hassle. I can walk into the bike rental at the station, take a bike, present my pass, and walk out with the bike all under a minute or so.
Thanks for the video!! I’m from Spain and I think that the main difference between Europe and the US is that European population is more highly packed in cities and towns of all sizes. Meaning that many small villages in my region (Navarre) may have a health center and a primary school and grocery stores, even small ones. In some villages even the doctor, the priest and even the baker truck will get to the village so elder people no need to move.
My priest, for instance will spend most of Sunday morning driving from village to village.
Thanks again 👍👍
Navarra is one of the best regions in Spain in terms of quality of life too!
I live in sweden and public transport is really well designed.... I have four bus stations near me that are closer than 100m to where I live, using them can get to the train station within 10 minutes, and it's the same ticket that works for trains, buses, subway and even some boats, so I can go from my home, with a bus to closest train station and then with train to closest subway to ride a subway to Stockholm on the same ticket!
In Italy there is a saying "Every road leads to Rome". Literally you can pick any road from north Italy and by the time you get close Bologna you start to see signs for Rome. Even roads to the country side can lead you easily there without using highways (especially if you don't want to pay for the toll) but it will take more time to reach
Same in german, and tbh i saw various times roadconstruction that removed all to the cobblestone layer and i am actually living on a roman build street in cologne.Its still cobblestone.
that's because the earliest roads were built by Roman legions to be used by the Roman legions when conqu... ahem... I mean defending, yes, defending Rome
@@Infidi yes, indeed, it was for defence
We have the same saying in Poland. About Rome
Typical saying in Spain too
A lot of the parking spaces in the larger cities here in the Netherlands are actually underground or very well hidden (A lot of the other countries in Europe have this as well, but this is from my Dutch experience). When these cities were build, cars didn't exist yet so we couldn't 'keep them in mind' while planning. Has forced us to be creative that's for sure.
Actually, that is not how things went. 'Not just bikes' is a YT channel that has a lot of interesting videos about this subject. It comes down to making certain choices, which were made in the '90s.
@@carmenl163 Many (and i mean MANY) cities all over Europe were already well established (and their main roads too) before the 1800s... All that those '90s could do was to ask how they can FIT what is already there, without razing it all down and starting from scratch...
@@irrelevant_noob That's not what happened. During the sixties and seventies there were made many adjustments for cars. In the 90's those were undone. NJB shows this in his videos.
@@carmenl163 idk... when you say "adjustments" i can only think how a whole neighborhood was flattened in my city to make room for a grandiose palace. And even that didn't quite "fix" the roads. Not much point in having 6 lanes there if all the access routes will only be 2-wide.
@@irrelevant_noob In Amsterdam they turned some canals (Elandsgracht, Rozengracht)into streets for cars. I mean those sort of adjustments.
I lived in Hamburg for about 20 years and most of them I didn't own a car, but then I increasingly felt a need to be in nature and by the seaside, so the last 4 years living in Hamburg I had a car, but only used it on the weekends to get out of the city. Now I live at the Baltic Sea in a very beautiful but remote spot. It would be impossible to live here without a car. What I really wanted to say is, even in Europe it depends pretty much on where you live...
I live in one of the biggest cities in Italy and to me owning a car would be a waste of money and time (since it'd be too hard to find a free parking lot), so I use the public transport, which isn't bad after all, and I can go around the whole country (and continent) with not much to worry about.
Just a correction on the video you were watching: you can move to another EU country for as long as you please. There isn't such a thing as a timed "visa" or permit to get to another European country, if both adhere to the Schengen treaty
7:00 as a Dutchy I had to giggle. Tourists always freak put over how big our bike parking is by the train stations XD
Exactly it just shows how little they know
As a Flemish guy I really hope our incompetent government will incorperate those big 'stackable' bike parkings now that our leftist goverbnment wants to make everything more green thus taking away parking space for the greenery thus making you pay for the fewer parking spaces we'll have where before you could stand 2h for free with a blue parking disc.
@@dennisengelen2517 In Gent Dampoort we have stackable bike parkings, only downside is, that you can't secure your bicycle as well. Also better and more efficient parking structures would be nice with a good connection to public transport would improve it a lot.
But I do agree that we need better, safer (, and more) parking spaces for bicycles. Instead of them cluttering sidewalks and thus making them less safe.
Even though I am neutral on the political spectrum and am more left leaning in what I vote, I can understand your frustration, and think parking should be much better, easier and cheaper with cars.
But in my opinion it should be done in such a way that we don't have to see the cars parked everywhere, instead proper underground parkings everywhere. I hate seeing plazas full of cars.
Instead of being angry at each other, we should think about how we can compromise and find a solution for us both.
I don't think it's as much the government being leftist, as it probably is that the EU is putting pressure on countries to do these things, and Belgium does not want to be left behind .
You live on a bike! My daughter is moving to The Netherlands and the number of bikes always gets me.
i live in rural germany and i own a car. I rarely travel by train or bus. But when i do, the next bus stop i just 500 meters away and the bus drives to the train station. Bus schedules are pinned at the bus stop or available online.
Bigger cities have a "park and ride" parkinglot in the outskirts of the city. Its safe to park your car there and travel to the city center by bus. Most cities are lacking parkingslots and/or are really expensive.
Well, the "other" Claudia from rural Germany said exactly what I wanted to say, so I just vote this up. :-)
"Rural Germany". Lmfao. It's adorable that Europeans think they have rural areas.
@@brandondavis7777 The only true rural areas are in Australia anyways, when the next neighbor is 4 hours by car away.
@@HappyBeezerStudios Australia ain't got shit on the USA in terms of rural areas.
Well maybe somebody That DB is amongst the worse train company in the Europe hahah 75% delays
Loved the video!!
Thank you for the conversations sir
That was both interesting and very depressing for me as a citizen of the U.S. I knew that we were behind Europe in this regard, but did not realize how far apart we were in efficient transportation. Like you, Ryan, I was horrified to learn that there is a greater emphasis on parking, than housing. When I heard that, my first thought was: Well, that explains our growing problem with homelessness. I think this proves to a point what I have come to believe, that the U.S., being so determinedly capitalistic, does mean that those with financial wealth do get the most effective lives, and those who have less and those at the bottom of the economic ladder truly do get the least, and our planning insures that. How sad its that? The sad thing to me is understanding that we could provide access and full participation in society at all levels, but we choose not to. Individual wealth is more important than societal health it appears.
step 1: make a tight public transport network as viable alternatives to cars
step 2: with less demand to do every trip by car, reduce parking spaces
step 3: turn parking spaces into affordable houses and local businesses. (It isn't uncommon to have multi storey apartment buildings with small businesses on the ground floor in Europe)
As good example, there is a big box store here (Used to be Werkauf, was part of Walmart when they tried and failed to enter the market) and is now part of Edeka) that has a bus that connects it to the tram nearby. It's a bus that only runs through business hours and only has two stops (the store and the tram) but it connects the store to the wider network across the industrial park and autobahn that are in between.
Imagine if you had a bus just to connect the local Walmart to the (comfortable and fast) tram that goes along the next big road. Why go by car if you can cross the parking lot without any work of your own.
@@HappyBeezerStudios Step 1. Remember Europea nations are tiny as fuck and irrelevant.
2. Remember step 1
3. Nobody wants that near their houses, noise and pollution are terrible.
Here we go again, Europe good, America bad. Also Living in metro cities good, while living in rural area or the suburbs bad yet again. Nothing but a bunch of angry, envious people coping.
@@ApricusInaros "The US on the other hand outshines Europe in other aspects of the daily life" Eh, not really. Not in anything that matters at least.
@@ApricusInaros Well name one then.
where i live, there are parking spots for bikes by the stations but you can also take it with you on the train. my dad goes by foldable bike and train to work almost every day and i study in the city and take the train back and forth each week
😁 Just last year (maybe the year before), they put a large, well-lit, covered bike parking lot next to the ministerium here in Vienna. It's pretty nice.
I watched your video carefully and I think that you speak in a very loyal way and I support you in further publication of videos.
Its insane how good the transportation system is in europe. If live in Germany but go to school in austria so every day I go by train and by bus to go to school
Normally you take the bus from near your house to the next trainstation if it to far away to walk or ride a bike....
Most EU trainstations got something like a secured bike parking lot.
As a Swiss I often drive my car to the trainstation when skiing to prevent the traffic jam down the mountain at the end of the day. There is lots of „park + ride“ options close to big cities as well, as parking is a nightmare. The bike you just lock in the bike parking. 😅
You walk to the bus stop (usually not more than 5 minutes in almost all towns and villages) you ride the bus to the trainstation (usually not more than 10 minutes) Then you can use the train to go to almost any city in your country (1-6 hours, in germany at least)
But still. In more rural areas in germany you still need a car, but guess what: The traffic density is low enough that there is no congestion.
(We still have a lot of problems with trains, don´t get me wrong, but it´s nothing compared to US)
You can take your bike with you on the train. Some train stations also have some kind of 'bike garage' to store your bike safely until you come back later. Some bus stations have those too.
Yes, particulary in rural or suburban areas of europe commuters are using their cars to go the first miles to the train station. There they have large parking lots to leave the cars, and the people are using public transport to reach their offices/factories in town. We call it park & ride. The newest development is to build bycicle garages and electric car rentals at the suburbn train stations to give the people an alternative for the first/last miles.
we can also bring the bikes on the train!! that's really useful (he was confused ab that lmao)
idk in other countries, but in denmark, we usually get "parking complexes" where they just add layer upon layer of parking spots, and they usually sit in centralized locations so we have minimal walking time from parking to a wide range of stores
I commute in to London by train fairly regularly. Depending on where I'm starting from/time of year/amount of luggage, I either take one of my bikes on the train with me (one is a folding bike so I can even take it on the Tube), or yes - I drive to the train station, leave my car in the station car park, and get the train into central London.
It's _possible_ to drive into London, but no-one does because it would take twice as long, cost twice as much, and be at least twice as stressful. As it is, I can work on the train, watch a film, read a book, nap, chat to friends, or just gaze out the window for a bit. Our rail network used to have a strap line - _"Let the train take the strain..."_
In spain, in some cities you can have a card to rent a bike in specific spots operated with machines on the street, go where you need, and normally, close to you, you have another same spot to deposit the bike.
And normally in big cities, if you have an old car (15 to 20 years, depending if it is diesel or gasoline), you are not allowed to enter in the city because of the pollution.
6:15 Yes, most people in Europe own a car, but no, they don't drive it to the train station. Train stations are easily accessible by bicycle or bus connections. Most large city centers are also devoid of cars, with parking garages on the edges of the city (which are usually accessible by highway rings around the city).
Now that was a gross generalisation. In fact many cities have a park and ride system and many people coming from the suburbs will go to the train station with their car. Also, center of cities being pedestrian also isn't that common. Guess you must be from Netherlands because it's literally the only country where all of this applies, but Netherlands beats the rest of Europe by a huge gap here
@@sidlerm1 Many? What shit are you spewing? You pulled that info out your ass? You can travel to train station by car, but most people arrived their by any means that are not cars, be it public transport, biking or by foot.
French HST : TGV Paris-Bordeaux, travel on Tuesday January 31, departure Paris 9:11 am - arrival Bordeaux 11:14 am, journey time 2h03mn for a 630 km long travel, priced at 22euros.
In Brisbane, there are free car parks at the suburban railway stations for all day parking if needed. You can also ride your bike to the station and then take it on the train if you need to. I walk to the station from my place as do a lot of other people.
To give you an example, I live in a small town, back when I was a student, I had no money for a car, but I still had the possibility to take a bus and then a tramway to get me to my school in a bigger city.
And now, if I want to Paris for example, I can either take a longer trip by bike to the closest train station and park it there, I could take my car to the train station (it's a small one, with a small parking, usually more than enough), and then, about an hour later, I'm in Paris where either bus or metro will get me almost everywhere (and if it's not enough, I can use the available bikes).
Now, about parking itself, it's rare to see large parking places outside of just shopping centers, most of the time, parking is either on the side of the road or in underground parkings.
You should consider doing streams, so that you can have people talk about or correct what is being said in the videos you react to!
That would be great!
I totally agree.
4:33 That map of Europe's roads is ridiculous.
Yes it’s wrong just just like that train map at the start. Totally simplified down to just the main lines and roads, as if they’re the only ones
In Germany, where i live, the government incentives projects known as „Park and Ride“ where rural areas receive money to build parking lots and bike racks at their train stations, so people who would normally use the car to get to a city, use the train. You may notice a blue sign with „P+R“ when you’re at a rural trainstation. But this is also due to the fact that they want to enable the youth to have an option to get from A to B before they are allowed to drive when they turn 18.
to answer your question about how to get to the train station, from a personal perspective, i live in a tiny village of around 200-250 people and we have two bus stations, that you can get to in like 5-8 minutes from the furthest houses.
sure, because it's such a small village, the buses only run once every two hours on average and one of the lines only runs on weekdays, but it's still very easily workable around and to live here, unless you need to haul big and heavy things often, you do not need a car at all, even for an area that's considered quite remote.
when i'm in the city for uni, there are buses, trams and metro that runs everywhere at all times of the day (of course there's not that many night lines, but those only operate from 1-5 am, any other time the regular transport runs very often)
and even if you don't use public transport, biking is almost always a viable option, since everything is so close together
4:43 This is an mistake in the OG. When you see this graphic he says the EU isn't on that list, correct BUT Then says European countries are NOT on that list BUT Russia and Ukraine are part of Europe.
You actually immediately picked up on the main issue that American urban planning makes public transportation really hard to implement successfully. I'm kinda impressed lol.
The strict zoning laws are stupid for a bunch of reasons. Aside from the obvious ones related to car dependency, it's not good for kids' social lives and excersise, nor social (class) blending. And the US pretends to be very friendly to small businesses, but they're not allowed in those huge zones. And if they were, you'd need a bunch of parking spaces, because the suburbs are so sprawling you can't walk or ride a bike.
Everything is just so stupidly stupid, all to push car use (and fuel) and social /class segregation.
@@MrMezmerized Even if the small businesses are set up, they have the desert of parking space around them to match, and the distance from residential areas (and the fact that all the streets are built like high-capacity roads for driving down fast) mean that people will probably drive past you anyway unless they already knew what you were before approaching your (hopefully huge by necessity) sign.
@@natchu96 I was thinking of small businesses within residential areas, or at the edge. Access pretty good and enough people living in the area. But you still have the disadvantage of suburbs being so spread out, and people wanting to drive, even if they could go by bike.
The US needs to revert to more mixed zoning with houses, small appartment buildings and small businesses. But I think a lot of people will want to keep the segregation, even though mixing things up a bit will make a more vibrant and connected community.
5:09 considering that he has been talking about roads and transportation across vast distances we can assume he is talking about cars
where to put your bike if you go on a train in europe:
Take it with you and (in some places) pay extra for taking up extra room
leave it at the train station in a "bike parker" and lock it
at home and just walk to the train station as it probably isnt too far away
also parking garages are mostly underground (atleast where i am) and mostly aren't visible from above
10:00 you do see a parking garage, it is under the canal. Maybe not this particular one, but there is in Amsterdam. 😉
It depends on where in Europe you live though.
I come from a small town in southern Italy and driving a car is essential, as public transport, although it exists, is completely unreliable. I used to live very close to the city center, so I was lucky enough everything I needed was at walking distance, but my office was in the suburbs and man was it hell driving to and from, and finding a parking space was just a nightmare.
Five years ago I moved to Munich, and my perspective completely changed. Public transport is very well developed, works efficiently and is reliable, you can easily reach any area of the city. It's expensive, I'll give you that, but nothing compared to the costs that owning a car entails. I only own a bike here, and even though I miss driving a car, I don't miss one at all. I just don't need it.
7:02 --> You can go to the train station using public coaches. Every bus-stop is very close to every house.
To answer your question "How do people get to the train station? ":
I live in what is considered to be a third-world country in Europe called Bulgaria. We have a very poor but really wide railway web.
1. You get more train stations with big cities
2. You can use all kinds of public transport to get to the station:
A. Bus
B. Traincar
C. Subway
3. You can also rent a bike or e-bike (not so popular yet)
4. You can use your personal bike, there are lots of public bike parkings (ironic, but take a lot less space)
5. You can rent an e-scooter
6. There are really affordable e-cars that you can rent and pay something like $5-$10 for the first 15 minutes (depending on the model) and then you're charged by the minute
7. Of course you can walk to the station as well if it's within a walking distance
As you can see there are lots of ways to get to the station and I'm probably missing something since it's currently 1:30AM.
Also huge amount of parking spaces are hidden bellow houses (this is the case mostly for cities) or near malls there are parkings with 2-3 stories, they take smaller space in city but hold a lot of parking spaces
in many rural areas and at the edge of the larger cities so-called park + ride lots at train stations are very common to see; Besides going there by car, these stations are also served by local bus services covering the area
Yes, we use our cars to get to train stations. At central train stations or connection hubs there is an area called "Prak and Ride" to park our cars and travel further along with public transportation. At least in germany for my knowledge.
Greetings from Switzerland :) I really enjoy your Videos Thx!
For the statistics on bikes, the Netherlands, the home of a huge load of bikes, has 17.5 million citizens and 23+ million bikes. Due to high safety standards in its infrastructure, people find it a really good alternative to cycle to work, friends, family, grocery shops etc. It also helps that shops/restaurants are allowed in residential areas, so you can find a grocery store every 3km in rural areas at the least.
As an East European, I heard about the inside joke in Denmark and the Netherlands that if you didn't have a bike as a kid, you were probably neglected by your parents. I mean, it puts into perspective just how common cycling is.
My daughter is moving to The Netherlands and we already provide a bike
The Europe being bigger part was hilarious 😂😂😂 keep the videos coming, you seem like a genuine cool guy 😁
Love this topic. In our capital in Belgium, Brussels, several streets are closed to cars. And in many other cities in Belgium
You can absolutely run a train track trough a city without it being annoying. The trains can be undeground or simply so quiet they don't bother anyone. There are footbridges or underpasses to go from one side to another. It's no problem at all :)
Or, they can slow down a bit in city limits so there is not as much noise. Not even needed to place new tracks or buy new trains. Just take it easy.
1. Yes, many people in Europe own a Car, but far less than the US. You can use your Car to drive to a Trainstation and park it there to continue with a Train, if there is a P&R (Park & Ride) area.
2. If you use a Bike to reach a Trainstation (and you have a ticket for the Bike), you can take it into the Train. There is often an area to place it.
3. Unless you life in Village, public transportation is more or less tightly woven. Busses, Trams, Trains, Subways. But even in the smallest Village, you will find atleast one Busstop. Their schedule isnt good (why sending a Bus to a small village every 30 min, if there arent enough people to use it that often?), maybe 3-4 times a day, but thats still better than having no public transportation. Its complicated. People who move to a village have a Car, partially because there is no good public transportation. But this means it doesn't pay off to schedule more Busses to that Village, since so many people have a Car.
I tried to get a license^^ That was over 15 years ago. The times i would have really needed a car so far is not even 2 digits.
9:55 thats Amsterdam..its a bike City..
its easier and cheaper to drive a car on the moon.😆
you are right, there is lots of bike parking near trainstations. and the current traffic minister said that more bike parting is needed.
"Where would you put your bike?" Well depending on it being just a shopping trip, a 1-3 day visit or a week or longer trip you would do different things.
- shopping trip: there are spaces with room for leaving your bike with these metal thingys to "park" your bike at. It helps the bike staying upright even in windy conditions.
1-3 days: train stations in medium to bigger cities often have closed in accommodation you can rent cheap for your bike to prevent it being stolen or just not out in the open for the elements.
- A week or longer: same as the 1-3 days, but at this point you probably have some bagge for your trip so you may end up taking the bike with you(yes that very much is an option with spaces in most trains accommodating this) or you get a friend or family member to drop you of at the station.
I grew up in a very small city, just on the inside of the city border, but only had about 3km to the train and 1km to the nearest bus stop.
In highschool i took my bike to school everyday. For me it was only 10km, some of my classmates had 16-18km. I guess it also has to do with a diffrent mentality. Some of my classmates lived close to the school, shopping districts and any groceri stores, so the idea of walking more than 500 meters to get anywhere was afronting to them, and no longer than mabye 5km on bike to get anywhere was the same. In comparison anyone living on a farm or outskirts of a smaller city, was very used to longer disdences. I personally take the bus or train if there are longer than 20km between home and school/workplace/friends & family/club meetups, but that's just me
10:44 both on bikes and healthy people:
The is a great channel that’s called not just bikes, which is a channel focused on the differences of street and general city design. It is run by someone who is originally from London Canada. You should really check him out.
London, Canada. aka fake London :D
Check out the vids of "Not just bikes" he perfectly talks about the differences between NA cities and European ones - also about the Bike-Train combo you wondered about!
czcams.com/video/1UxCbmT9elk/video.html
Where I am from yes some people takes the car to the trainstation and have their car parked at "communters parking". Mostly happens in more rural areas where the public transportation has fewer departures and take much longer time then driving the car. However it also happens that people that live and work close to eachother pool up and use one car at the time and split the cost of gas.
during high school we had a somewhat social experiment in my city. A group of students that would divide up and get to a destination while using different transport, while abiding all the laws (no jaywalking, speeding or biking in a walking zone etc.). The bike was the fastest followed by the tram, the walker, motorbike, the car and finally the bus.
The bus was last due to frequent stops whilst having to wait for it for long.
The car and motorbike essentially got there at the same time but due to being able to pass cars up front sooner, the motorbike got there first.
The walker (more like the speed walker) got there quickly because he could cut so much of the distance just going through parks and stuff, the bike also had that pleasure, for most of it that's why he got there the fastest.
The tram guy got there pretty fast too because trams are innately faster in traffic than regular cars and have fewer obstructions.
7:03 in Poland trains have one carriage where you can leave your bike next to the doors
americans probably never heard of a bike part in the train :D
Just some random answers to Ryan's doubts and questions:
- You can drive the bike to the train station, there are parking lots for bikes, but you sometimes can get your bike or e-bike ON the train. There are some places on the train for the bikes on regional/local train (not the ones going to 320km/h) and have also the recharge plugs for free.
- About parking for bikes, you can have also am app-driven closed box to put your bike into, with recharge point. So you can got o work while your bike recharge the battery.
- About distances from stations. I live near a little fisherman village on the coast. I have a train station at 800 meters from me, and another at 1200 meters on the other side. I live between two near villages. Obviously this is not valid for all Europe, but can be representative of some of our countries. My aunt lives to 20km from the nearest town and the car is essential.
- About pedestrian only areas. Most of the big cities have one or more pedestrian area in which cars are prohibited or restricted to necessity only. If you're moving, you can ask city administration a permit to park a truck under your home valid just for the hour you need it.
- We have malls built just to "copy" America and feel international", but we don't really need them, our malls are our city streets. Every neighborhood has the most common kind stores and shops, if you want a specific brand you can go into the center of city or town, which often is a specific street or square, where the fanciest shops usually are. Biggest cities have biggest centers, sometimes more than one. Often those centers have this qualification since medieval times. The city hall can have 500 years still being the most representative and prestigious building of the town. Even little village have often a central square or street.
I am 20 years old and I have never driven, I have always been able to go anywhere by public transport, one of the things I like most about being European is that
12:40 😮 Wow, in the Netherlands typically any road allowing cars over 18 mph the vulnerable cyclist gets separated into protected bike paths. Not just lanes, proper separated paths. Some rural roads allow shared usage, those have speed limits of 37 mph. Anything above that is off limits for cyclists and generally has bike infrastructure even more separated from the high speed road.
And yes these bike paths still allow us to traverse the entire country without fearing for our safety.
There are exceptions, but generally that is the rule. People do speed on those 50km/h roads. It can feel unsafe at times.