There is one thing that Einstein could not fully understand; the fundamental constant which nagged him. Gravity. Which is why he was seeking a unified theory of everything.
According to me the universe is expanding till it reaches youth and start contracting the expanding process is simultaneously make steady state of universe
In effect, superposition is time measured against itself, as in an infinite range of quantization rates, orbital periods, on the same point-like origin. Synchronous timing have a multiple of Pi in it and magnitude of coexistence in position is relative values of "e" multiple and logarithm in reciprocal relationships of timing to spacing. The reciprocal of e differentiation magnitude is the area or probability, equivalent values in changed spacetime shape. Observation is by resonance, innate reproduction of recognition, so no theory or proof is required. (To ad a quote from "The Hunting of the Snark", and/or Jabberwocky was current "in my day") The mathematical properties that "emerge" from superposition are the occurrence of all the number-line cofactor/coincidence base numbers in the logarithmic expansion of the natural logarithm , reflected in the antilog. So a self-selected measurement of log base is the sub-origin of expansion rate and condensation, creating interpenetration of quantization bubbles of coordination. "Everything" is this connected relative angle-space of time interference. The problem is that what you see and perceive are easily distorted by other's perceptions, so the disciplines of scientific research are required to develop unbiased interpretation and precise recognition of the specific universal principles. That's the "hard problem". Thanks for the help, Professor Gribbin.
Mass (in kilograms)=Charges squared(in Coulombs squared)x 10 to the power 7 divided by distance(between the charges in meters). that's how Newton's Equation of Universal Gravitation is equivalent to Coulomb's Law, and thus works for NASA.
How can space be flat? I would imagine round like a ball. In the big bang which I imagine was an explosion? Most explosions go out equally in all directions making a round ball of fire.
+baxtar1963 Most explosions do _not_ include the whole universe. In an ordinary explosion, space time is more or less static (on the scales of an explosion you can see in a weak gravity like that of earth). In the big bang "explosion" space itself is expanding. What that means is that the scale over every part gets bigger. Now you could have a universe that is negatively "curved", or positively "curved", or "flat". Any of these can have the scale of things increase with time, that is to say, expanding. These terms mean a very specific mathematical thing in the way that measurements can be done, which is called curvature. It's best not to think of "looking down" on the universe, or looking at the universe from "outside", in a higher dimension. like you would do in looking at the surface of a sphere. No "outside" is necessary to measure curvature, all you have to do is look at certain properties of measurement _within_ the universe itself. In the negative "curvature" or "flat" cases the straightest possible path could in theory go on forever, in those cases, the universe is not restricted to anything like a ball, but is infinite. In the positive case, the universe would be finite in size. An example of a measurement you can do in a "flat" universe and no other is adding the angles of a right angled triangle and getting exactly 180 degrees. In the other cases this is not so.
flat geometry doesn't mean 'flat' as in English. Flat means 'having no curvature' in three or four dimensions, _not_ 2-dimensional, as in 'a flat sheet of paper'.
+baxtar1963 when they say flat, it basically means it just exists everywhere without any dimensions or size, like a limitless canvas for a painting, could be termed as 1 dimensional but we cannot determine something has dimensions or not unless it has 2 or more dimensions, there are contradicting theories in the scientific community as well, Einstein's General Relativity says there are curves in this flat space meaning gaps which make the planets revolve around each other, Newton said gravity makes planets revolve, Quantum Theory says dark matter and dark energy make everything move whereas String theory says everything is connected, take your pick
There is one thing that Einstein could not fully understand; the fundamental constant which nagged him. Gravity. Which is why he was seeking a unified theory of everything.
According to me the universe is expanding till it reaches youth and start contracting the expanding process is simultaneously make steady state of universe
Do we know who the woman mathematician is that assists with answering the questions?
Beautiful
Fantastic talk 👍
29:22 - The most London accent in the room.
Oh, it's actually english?
Who is she?
In effect, superposition is time measured against itself, as in an infinite range of quantization rates, orbital periods, on the same point-like origin. Synchronous timing have a multiple of Pi in it and magnitude of coexistence in position is relative values of "e" multiple and logarithm in reciprocal relationships of timing to spacing. The reciprocal of e differentiation magnitude is the area or probability, equivalent values in changed spacetime shape. Observation is by resonance, innate reproduction of recognition, so no theory or proof is required. (To ad a quote from "The Hunting of the Snark", and/or Jabberwocky was current "in my day")
The mathematical properties that "emerge" from superposition are the occurrence of all the number-line cofactor/coincidence base numbers in the logarithmic expansion of the natural logarithm , reflected in the antilog. So a self-selected measurement of log base is the sub-origin of expansion rate and condensation, creating interpenetration of quantization bubbles of coordination. "Everything" is this connected relative angle-space of time interference.
The problem is that what you see and perceive are easily distorted by other's perceptions, so the disciplines of scientific research are required to develop unbiased interpretation and precise recognition of the specific universal principles. That's the "hard problem".
Thanks for the help, Professor Gribbin.
Except for the periods...moreike eons. Hee-haws! Hee-hee-hee-hah-hah-hah!
lo ultimo que mencionó el hombre fue realmente hermoso, agradezco haber conocido la ciencia. Yo no busqué la ciencia, la ciencia me encontró ☺.
Gorgeous and a genius, she's the perfect combination! I'd put a ring on it!
eww
+TheProfessor936 - OR A RING THROUGH IT.!
TheProfessor936 totally agree
TheProfessor936 does anybody know who she is?
Gross.
Mass (in kilograms)=Charges squared(in Coulombs squared)x 10 to the power 7 divided by distance(between the charges in meters). that's how Newton's Equation of Universal Gravitation is equivalent to Coulomb's Law, and thus works for NASA.
How can space be flat? I would imagine round like a ball. In the big bang which I imagine was an explosion? Most explosions go out equally in all directions making a round ball of fire.
+baxtar1963 Most explosions do _not_ include the whole universe. In an ordinary explosion, space time is more or less static (on the scales of an explosion you can see in a weak gravity like that of earth). In the big bang "explosion" space itself is expanding. What that means is that the scale over every part gets bigger.
Now you could have a universe that is negatively "curved", or positively "curved", or "flat". Any of these can have the scale of things increase with time, that is to say, expanding. These terms mean a very specific mathematical thing in the way that measurements can be done, which is called curvature.
It's best not to think of "looking down" on the universe, or looking at the universe from "outside", in a higher dimension. like you would do in looking at the surface of a sphere. No "outside" is necessary to measure curvature, all you have to do is look at certain properties of measurement _within_ the universe itself.
In the negative "curvature" or "flat" cases the straightest possible path could in theory go on forever, in those cases, the universe is not restricted to anything like a ball, but is infinite. In the positive case, the universe would be finite in size. An example of a measurement you can do in a "flat" universe and no other is adding the angles of a right angled triangle and getting exactly 180 degrees. In the other cases this is not so.
+baxtar1963 You're out of your league and trying to understanding something without the proper training and understanding of ohysics etc...
flat geometry doesn't mean 'flat' as in English. Flat means 'having no curvature' in three or four dimensions, _not_ 2-dimensional, as in 'a flat sheet of paper'.
+Omegawerewolfx no he is not, logic is never out of league of anything
+baxtar1963 when they say flat, it basically means it just exists everywhere without any dimensions or size, like a limitless canvas for a painting, could be termed as 1 dimensional but we cannot determine something has dimensions or not unless it has 2 or more dimensions, there are contradicting theories in the scientific community as well, Einstein's General Relativity says there are curves in this flat space meaning gaps which make the planets revolve around each other, Newton said gravity makes planets revolve, Quantum Theory says dark matter and dark energy make everything move whereas String theory says everything is connected, take your pick
great
Wonderful talk. I don't understand the questions, let alone the answers. Does anyone have a drink that gives you IQ rather than wings.
Who is she?