DLO Reviews: Meopta Optika6 3-18x50 with MRAD1 reticle overview

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
  • A brief discussion of crossover scopes in general with some detail on Meopta Optika6 3-18x50 immediately after, followed by a detailed look at the MRAD1 reticle.
    Russian language overview starts at ~25:50.
    amzn.to/2NHz0EZ
    alnk.to/dL8V4T2

Komentáře • 76

  • @wadeperkins6746
    @wadeperkins6746 Před 4 lety +10

    I have the same scope but with the 56mm objective. By far my favorite reticle , and one of my favorite scopes. I prefer my Meopta Optika6 over my Vortex Viper PST Gen II 3-15X44.

  • @user-om8tl1ln1j
    @user-om8tl1ln1j Před 2 lety +2

    Спасибо за интересное видео))). Раньше прицелы меопта не рассматривал к приобретению из-за примитивных прицельных сеток, потом все таки случайно просматривая увидел сетку MRAD1, это сетка очень понравилась. Из- этого видео понял, что автором этой грамотной сетки являетесь Вы. Теперь если буду приобретать следующий прицел, то скорее всего Меопта с сеткой MRAD1 или что то подобное.

  • @walterwhittington576
    @walterwhittington576 Před 26 dny +1

    What about toughness, does it compared to scope like Leupold when it come to durability.

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 26 dny +1

      @@walterwhittington576 it is a well built scope. I would not expect issues

  • @clidester18
    @clidester18 Před 2 lety +2

    How do you feel this compares to a razor LHT 4.5-22x50

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 2 lety +1

      LHT is a notable step-up from the Optika6.

    • @clidester18
      @clidester18 Před 2 lety +1

      @@DarkLordOfOptics thanks for the quick response.

  • @foxfinnish3062
    @foxfinnish3062 Před 3 lety +2

    Look through both versions english and russian and jump to conclusion that this reticle could be very useful for hunting, it's cozy to get shooting lead horizontally using your design and good idea not illuminate the donut, as I use circle dot mark on swarowski 1,25-4 and for me its a little bit overilluminated even at the low illuminate value. Also its good in practical point of view to have low profile wind turret covered as it's steacky to everything in the forest, car etc, as well as idea with fixed vertical turret, simple and evidently workable. As for you question to us:
    Crossover- it's hard to find proper word on russian, but lets say универсальный, для всех возможных задач, хотя и универсальных вещей не бывает.
    Eyepiece- окуляр, eyerelief - расстояние от окуляра до глаза, при котором вы получаете нормальную рабочую картинку.
    Hash- вертикальная черточка, (зарубка) в контексте повествования. На сленге стрелков- расчёска. Спасибо за видео, глубоко, познавательно, хорошо доносите информацию!

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      спасибо за терминологию! I agree on overilluminating precision or hunting reticles. For AR-15 scopes, I like to illuminate the donut, but for higher magnification designs I really prefer to illuminate very little of the reticle.

    • @foxfinnish3062
      @foxfinnish3062 Před 3 lety

      @@DarkLordOfOptics Glad to help you in some extent. Please feel free to ask if you will have any doubts regarding translation complication. Thank you for your information it's surprisingly precise and valuable.

  • @user-ww3cj2wq9h
    @user-ww3cj2wq9h Před 3 lety +1

    Такой вопрос: подскажите пожалуйста
    Выбор оптика в FFP для охоты и тактики 3-18 или 4,5-27 . Мутнит ли оптика на больших кратах? Какие линзы у них? Исходя из ваших публикации,Меопта на голову выше Вортекса. Чем он лучше? По каким качествам? Была бы возможность посмотреть Меопту я понял бы,ксожаленью только по заказу можно преобрести.

  • @faethon21
    @faethon21 Před rokem +1

    That's a very nice reticle. Does someone know if the turrets of the 3-18x56 are scaled in Mrad? I ask because in the optika6 manual and their website it states: Impact per click (cm @ 100 m) = 0.7 for 3-18x50 FFP and 3-18x56 RD FFP

    • @faethon21
      @faethon21 Před rokem

      I answer my question after a reply from Meopta. The values on their website currently, are for the non-mrad reticles! This might by clarified in a future version of their website

  • @vpenkov4908
    @vpenkov4908 Před 2 lety +1

    You mention the 1-6 scope with the reticle you designed wasn't successful. Curious as to why? Thanks

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 2 lety

      It was the FFP version of the Meopta Optika6 1-6x24. I assumed it would have fairly bright illumination, so I designed the reticle with that in mind. When the scope arrived, the reticle ended up being too small for the rather weak illumination it has.

  • @user-ww3cj2wq9h
    @user-ww3cj2wq9h Před 3 lety +3

    Илья добрый вечер! Вам спасибо за разъяснения такой оптики,очень много вопросов отпало

  • @feartheduck6664
    @feartheduck6664 Před 2 lety +1

    I have 2 meopta optika 6 scopes in 4.5-27x50. They are superb. The MRAD1 reticule in FFP illuminated is excellent. I am a former Tangent and NF scope fan. The optika 6 more than keeps up with them.

    • @adamkadir3803
      @adamkadir3803 Před 2 lety

      This is just ludicrous. I've got a PM2 3-20 on my WinMag, a NF 4-16 ATACR on my 308, and have looked into the TT 3-15 for 7mm build... the Optika 6 3-18 on my .22 doesn't hold a candle.
      It tracks well and has good glass but that doesn't put it in the same league.

  • @Plamia2
    @Plamia2 Před 4 lety +6

    Илья, спасибо за продолжения обзоров на русском языке!
    eyepiece - окуляр
    hash - метка
    christmas tree reticle - в обиходе "ёлка", всем будет понятно о какой сетке идет речь
    Вопрос: не знаю, попадались Вам в руки прицелы Люпольд Марк4 2,5-8 во второй фокальной плоскости, но если да, то в этой Меопте 3-18 стекло в целом лучше или хуже?

  • @lillyvang3537
    @lillyvang3537 Před 4 lety +1

    Meopta site lists the 4.5-27 to be shorter length than the 3-18. Are you able to confirm that? Thanks.

  • @pigbeater9286
    @pigbeater9286 Před 4 lety +1

    Was considering this EXACT scope for my Magnum springer air rifle. Will it take hard recoil?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 4 lety +1

      It should, but you may want to double check with Meopta

  • @moses-today
    @moses-today Před rokem

    Здравствуйте! Можно ли у вас проконсультироваться по технической части?

  • @midav4275
    @midav4275 Před 3 lety +1

    Есть версия этой Меопты 3-18х56. Намного ли светлее по сравнению с 50м объективом?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      У меня нет той версии.

    • @midav4275
      @midav4275 Před 3 lety +1

      @@DarkLordOfOptics понял, спасибо за оперативный ответ!) По поводу подсветки сетки mrad1 ещё небольшой вопрос. Интересно, почему решили не подсвечивать дерево и пончик? При низком освещении на минимальном увеличении подсветка пончика бы помогла, как и подсветка дерева на максимальном увеличении. Интересно ваше мнение как автора сетки. Спасибо.

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      @@midav4275 Именно из за ситуаций где плохое освещение. Когда вся сетка освещена, она действительно хорошо видна, но из за нее плохо видна цель.

  • @user-ww3cj2wq9h
    @user-ww3cj2wq9h Před 3 lety +1

    Илья,так какой прицел по вашему лучше,по сетки,по светопропускаемости,и чистоты линз? Меопта или все же Вортекс Даймонд?

  • @foxfinnish3062
    @foxfinnish3062 Před 3 lety +2

    Hi Ilya, glad to hear your videos it's quite useful. Please advice which scope will be better in terms of hunting 70% and paper 30% : Crimson trace 5 series 3-18x50 or this meopta 6 3-18×50 or 56? Both available for me at the almost same price, both FFP. Thanks in advance for fast response as I'm about to purchase one of them. What type of meopta reticle is recommended in case if you advice to go this way?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      Crimson Trace 5-series is better optically than Optika6, but its reticle is not great for hunting in low light, in my opinion. If a significant amount of the use is hunting, I think Optika6 with MRAD1 reticle will have an edge. Keep in mind that Brownells MPO 3-18x50, if it is available to you, has a better reticle visibility than CT and is as good optically and mechanically.

    • @foxfinnish3062
      @foxfinnish3062 Před 3 lety +1

      Finally, I've ordered Meopta opt 6 3-18x50 with your mrad1 reticle and jump to this decision after precise evaluation of the info posted by you and other guys on snipershide forum. I deeply convienced (or hope so) that my move to this scope is better than purchase of Crimson 5series that evidently discountinued and not so firm as meopta, however I assume that optically it could be better than meopta, am I right?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety

      Yes, by a little bit.

    • @foxfinnish3062
      @foxfinnish3062 Před 3 lety +1

      @@DarkLordOfOptics MPO is not available for me and if it was so, possibly I've turn my choice to it. But at the almost same price of 680$ I have a choice between those aforesaid meo and CT. CT reticle for me is not the right way to go buy as on low magnification I almost see nothing at the bush( I saw you video with reticle comparison and CT reticle was absolutely blind with the trees on the background and abscence of the bold horizontal lines on ct reticle as continuation of hashes is a fault imho.) That is why I've turned to Meopta and I sincerely hope that optical difference will not be significant, however I like meopta fixed top turret and covered windage turret. Will see how it pair with R93, basically it was aimed to be installed on 243 win.

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      @@foxfinnish3062 It is not a huge difference in optics. I think it will work well for you.

  • @irwig05
    @irwig05 Před 4 lety +2

    How does the Optika6 3-18x50 do in low light? I like the reticle you designed and the power range better than the Meostar options for hunting. I wouldn’t expect Meostar light gathering capability but how would you say it compares to a more common scope such as Leupold VX-3i or Viper PST II?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 4 lety +2

      It is pretty good. Same general ballpark as the PST Gen2, I think, and maybe a touch better than the VX-3i. Brownells MPO and Toric were a little better than the Optika6 in low light.

    • @irwig05
      @irwig05 Před 4 lety +1

      Dark Lord Of Optics thank you!!!

    • @shaolinwarriormark
      @shaolinwarriormark Před rokem +1

      @@DarkLordOfOptics have u tried out atibal hybrid 12 ffp yet?

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před rokem +2

      @@shaolinwarriormark I've seen it. It is deeply unimpressive.

    • @shaolinwarriormark
      @shaolinwarriormark Před rokem +1

      @@DarkLordOfOptics
      So for my ar15 i want to hit accurrately up to 600 meters.
      Would you reccommend the meopta optika6, primary arms 2.5-10×44,
      Or swampfox kentucky long 2-12×

  • @KLeger-iq3so
    @KLeger-iq3so Před 4 lety

    Have you had an opportunity to check out the 2.5-15x44? I just picked up one with the dichro bdc reticle. Just curious about your thoughts on it. Thanks!

  • @pleskov137
    @pleskov137 Před 2 lety +1

    Спасибо большое за обзор. Очень интересная сетка. И цена в РФ низкая, почти вдвое дешевле PST FFP gen2.

  • @MichaelJordan-hn4zd
    @MichaelJordan-hn4zd Před 4 lety

    Can you lock the right side? (Left and right) or is it always able to be moved

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 4 lety +1

      Do you mean the windage turret? It is covered.

    • @MichaelJordan-hn4zd
      @MichaelJordan-hn4zd Před 4 lety

      Dark Lord Of Optics thank you! I looked at one locally and it was weird because the right and left windage was wide open and able to be turned. Maybe the cover fell off

  • @user-ww3cj2wq9h
    @user-ww3cj2wq9h Před 3 lety

    И будут ли выпускать прицелы в FFP сетками zplus rd и M-Rad? В 3-18 4.5-27? Как я понял в России их нет пока. Преимущественно они есть в 5-30. Посоветуйте им чтоб производитель выпускал их в мрадах ,

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety

      Насчет Zplus, я не знаю, Мrad только в 5-30x56. В 3-18x50 только Mrad1

  • @hitfactor
    @hitfactor Před 4 lety +1

    Спасибо!

  • @user-ww3cj2wq9h
    @user-ww3cj2wq9h Před 3 lety

    Илья вы не думали о том,чтоб сделать чуть по легче оптику?или посоветовать производителю.? Ну Максиму 500-600гр

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 3 lety +1

      я советую, но они меня не особо слушают

  • @azamatrq7977
    @azamatrq7977 Před 4 lety

    Вы могли бы сказать о новой для нас оптики ATHLON и в частности модели ATHLON CRONUS BTR 4.5-29X56, и Athlon Aers 4.5-30x56 FFP ???

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 4 lety

      Это будет отдельное видео наверно.

    • @azamatrq7977
      @azamatrq7977 Před 4 lety

      @@DarkLordOfOptics Супер!!! Так много появилось не дорогих достойных прицелов и только вашим усилием мы люди Совка поймем что существует не только Найтфорс и Шиб и Бендер с Вортексом)))

  • @andrewlakeman186
    @andrewlakeman186 Před 4 lety

    Love the article is it available in the UK?

  • @azamatrq7977
    @azamatrq7977 Před 4 lety +4

    Спасибо за обзор на русском.

  • @user-zg1vd6ec4l
    @user-zg1vd6ec4l Před 4 lety +2

    Многоцелевой - cross over.

  • @user-uy6os4qm6o
    @user-uy6os4qm6o Před 4 lety +1

    Приветствую всех. Вот только где на русском везде англ..?

    • @azamatrq7977
      @azamatrq7977 Před 4 lety +1

      Со второй половины смотри

  • @user-uy6os4qm6o
    @user-uy6os4qm6o Před 4 lety +1

    Теперь догнал, когда на русском

  • @michaelmcduff2263
    @michaelmcduff2263 Před 4 lety +4

    I've watched a number of your videos for years. You know what you're talking about but........... for Gods sake man............get some decent video and audio equipment! The final video presentation is terriable using a smart phone. Speak Up! We can't hear you. C'mon man!

    • @DarkLordOfOptics
      @DarkLordOfOptics  Před 4 lety +3

      I am dong the best I can with what I've got. If you are volunteering to buy me a bunch of audio video equipment, I will not say no. Until then, all I can promise is incremental improvements as I get better at this.

    • @jat2409
      @jat2409 Před 4 lety +1

      Too bad, he lost me as a viewer, could barely hear him.

    • @beardedbjorn5520
      @beardedbjorn5520 Před 4 lety

      I can’t hear a thing either

    • @JohnSmith-jh1iy
      @JohnSmith-jh1iy Před 2 lety +1

      I can hear it fine. Dont complain about something you get for free!

  • @lidijabacic8348
    @lidijabacic8348 Před rokem +1

    i cant take a scope made by a youtuber seriously 😂😂

  • @rich1958
    @rich1958 Před 3 lety

    Lots of mumbling...