@@TheRafaelBond Stan hit through his backhand more, barely brushing over the ball to give it just enough topspin to give him control. His backhand was certainly powerful, but it was his accuracy which made it so deadly. His equally strong forehand and formidable serve made him a feared opponent whom nobody wanted to face.
I was at this match, in the fourth row after camping out in the queue overnight. What a match to catch, Wawrinka had just won the french open so I was expecting him to get through. Beautiful tennis, great crowd, a lifetime memory
@@GameOfLife55 Not really, I mean on any other surface yes... But Stan's game is really not the best for grass... I think at Grass he cant compete with Big 3
I think it's too late now and maybe he never really had a chance, but i would've liked to see Wawrinka win Wimbledon just so he'd have completed career grand slam without ever being ranked #1
@@andrejmitrovic4958 i agree. Because Wawrinka started winning more matches against big 3 after the beginning of AO 2014. Before that he was an average sort of player.
@@andrejmitrovic4958 We have absolutely no idea about that. Stan's worst surface is indeed grass, but in his 2014-2016 prime he was definitely a top 8 grass player. His best Wimby match was against Fed the year before in 2014 where it was a matter of Fed being more clutch at key points. However Wawrinka is stylistically a hard match up for Nole (hence why he leads the GS H2H since 2014-onward), so there would have been a good chance he would have beat Nole in that semi. Don't forget he beat Nole at the RG final a month before, so he would have the mental edge going into that match as well.
What a great match that was- Revenge of the French open 2013, similar match but Wawrinka won. I hope we'll get some matches from 2011. Nadal-Djokovic, Nadal-Murray, Djokovic-Tsonga, Federer-Djokovic...
A couple of things held Gasquet back from achieving greater heights. The first was his forehand grip. He was one of the very few players since the 1980s who adopted an almost continental grip. Back in the 1980s only McEnroe and Edberg were the players using a similar grip, how rare that is. So, Gasquet's forehand was erratic and unreliable. Then I am not sure about his athleticism, he was not the quickest. Those two factors held him back, but the forehand was his biggest isse.
I always find this comment unfair and just lazily going with the consensus. He has an unbelievable backhand and but his forehand and serve have never been anywhere near the very top guys. I’d say he’s achieved about what he should have
@@Jordothecat98 when he was younger his 4hand was good. He could have improved his serve like djo & nadal but he never had the mental strength to be a top player
We know that Djokovic is better than Wawrinka in clay by miles but the swiss managed to win in Roland Garros So why not the better Nole in grass beated again by Wawrinka The challenge between both push the limits of surfaces
Richard 1 of the Best Players Never to Win A Masters 1000 & Slam.. Stan A Poster - Player For Late Bloomers Won Australian Open Aged 28 Years and 10 Months Old..
Even on bh, Stan has better serve, Stan has better fh, Stan is a slightly better overall athlete, both average volleys/oh, mentally I’d give Stan the edge in self belief, so overall, it’s not that close, even though purely on talent, the margins are small
@LUCAS LORENS EMILIO CERVERA Based on? When did prime Wawrinka play a Djokovic at Wimby? Besides, at the end of Wimby the grass has detoriated so much it's not as fast anymore. This + the fact he is stylistically a very hard match up for Nole makes me think Stan would have beaten Nole in the semis (had he gotten past Gasquet).
I'm just hear for the backhands :)
Main difference of their backhands: Richard's generates more spin - Stan's higher speed.
On average. Gasquet can outhit Stan‘s hardest for single shots
@@TheRafaelBond Stan hit through his backhand more, barely brushing over the ball to give it just enough topspin to give him control. His backhand was certainly powerful, but it was his accuracy which made it so deadly. His equally strong forehand and formidable serve made him a feared opponent whom nobody wanted to face.
Richard Gasquet beated Stan wawarinka in Wimbledon QF in the epic 5 setter battle which is crazy.
I was at this match, in the fourth row after camping out in the queue overnight. What a match to catch, Wawrinka had just won the french open so I was expecting him to get through. Beautiful tennis, great crowd, a lifetime memory
Such a beauty of a backhand from Gasquet, marvelous.
Amazing match, one of the best Gasquet tournaments ever, he comfortably went through very good players there, but Novak was at another level
Wawrinka would made a better match against Djokovic than Gasquet.
This was hardly comfortable for Gasquet.
Comfortable? Please. He laid an egg against Djokovic.
@@leoxardisimo I keep thinking that Stan would have even beaten Djokovic in that semi.
@@GameOfLife55 Not really, I mean on any other surface yes... But Stan's game is really not the best for grass... I think at Grass he cant compete with Big 3
I think it's too late now and maybe he never really had a chance, but i would've liked to see Wawrinka win Wimbledon just so he'd have completed career grand slam without ever being ranked #1
2:14:31 Maravilhoso! É de encher os olhos! Que belos backhands!
poor Wawrinka, at the same time loses "live" matches on two Channels, here to Gasquet, on the other one to Tsonga ;D
Gasquet - Roddick, quarters 2007 please next!
This is beautiful tennis.
C'est un joueur, Gasquet, que j'ai suivi depuis ses débuts...Un talent hors norme!!!
What a match!!!
Both single handed backhand are so amazing!
Thanks for this post!
Anyone else think Wimbledon needs to upload the 2015 semifinal between Federer and Murray?
Yes! One of Fed's best matches ever
It's fun to watch two players with one handed without the Oh No Oh Yess sounds.
Djokovic glad he didn't have to play Wawrinka in the semis
Man Djokovic would destroy him if they played there, Wawrinka is bad on grass.
@@andrejmitrovic4958 True but Warinka is a bigger threat to Djokovic than Gasquet
@@mikhael636 is't not "Big 4", and it will never be, there is Big 3
@@andrejmitrovic4958 i agree. Because Wawrinka started winning more matches against big 3 after the beginning of AO 2014. Before that he was an average sort of player.
@@andrejmitrovic4958 We have absolutely no idea about that. Stan's worst surface is indeed grass, but in his 2014-2016 prime he was definitely a top 8 grass player. His best Wimby match was against Fed the year before in 2014 where it was a matter of Fed being more clutch at key points. However Wawrinka is stylistically a hard match up for Nole (hence why he leads the GS H2H since 2014-onward), so there would have been a good chance he would have beat Nole in that semi. Don't forget he beat Nole at the RG final a month before, so he would have the mental edge going into that match as well.
What a great match that was- Revenge of the French open 2013, similar match but Wawrinka won.
I hope we'll get some matches from 2011. Nadal-Djokovic, Nadal-Murray, Djokovic-Tsonga, Federer-Djokovic...
A couple of things held Gasquet back from achieving greater heights. The first was his forehand grip. He was one of the very few players since the 1980s who adopted an almost continental grip. Back in the 1980s only McEnroe and Edberg were the players using a similar grip, how rare that is. So, Gasquet's forehand was erratic and unreliable.
Then I am not sure about his athleticism, he was not the quickest.
Those two factors held him back, but the forehand was his biggest isse.
どちらも片手バックハンドの名手だ。
Well done Gasquet!!!
i feel ya lol !
The best!!!
best backhands!
puoi mettere nadal vs muller wimbledon 2017? kyrgios vs nadal wimbledon 2014? kyrgios vs gasquet wimbledon 2014?? thanks
gasquet best backhand ever
Super match, keep feeding us please.
This is borderline a well made Hollywood movie
I love one handed backhand players
Please replay 1891 Wimbledon Gentlemen’s Final the Greatest Tennis Match of all time
made my day
the 1892 wimbledon final was way better. The shot making was unbelievable. specially the twinners
Gasquet biggest underachiever on tour unfortunately. Has more talent than Djoker or Murray.
Are u sure about that? I think I have more talent than gasquet but there u ho
He has a nice backhand ground stroke, that's it.
@@npe9483 Not really, the lad is insanely talented
I always find this comment unfair and just lazily going with the consensus. He has an unbelievable backhand and but his forehand and serve have never been anywhere near the very top guys. I’d say he’s achieved about what he should have
@@Jordothecat98 when he was younger his 4hand was good. He could have improved his serve like djo & nadal but he never had the mental strength to be a top player
I do not understand Gasquet slice is so underatted
Gasquet's problem like Tsonga and Monfils is that they have to loose one set to start playing well. So they always run after the score.
Typical French problem.
Please replay 1980 Wimbledon Gentlemen’s Final of Borg v McEnroe - The Greatest Tennis Match of all time
why is that the greatest? Its old stuff
Stan should've hit an under arm serve at 30 - 40
Since 2000 - 2022 Only ( 7 ) Players Have Won - Mens Singles Wimbledon Title..
Since 2013 Only ( 4 ) Players..
We know that Djokovic is better than Wawrinka in clay by miles but the swiss managed to win in Roland Garros
So why not the better Nole in grass beated again by Wawrinka
The challenge between both push the limits of surfaces
djokovic usually destroy the players who beats him in one counter or match before.
@@Logan00710 but not wawrinka on grandslams
@@shafqatishan437 and, what??? djokovic is 100 times better than wawrinka
The bounce on the grass makes wawrinka very uncfortable. Look at 2015 roland garros final stan was a beast on the clay
Can't believe Gasquet won. He looked like he was about to cry in the fifth set.
How is it only 3 and a half hours? 9-10 in the fifth???
Seolferwulf AHA! That’s why!
ワウリンカのふとももが凄い太いのは低い打点でのバックハンドの安定感に大きく貢献している。
After this match ended in Gasquet's favour, Djokovic was seen partying all night.
another idiot complaining
Please make vedio on weired rules on tennis plz
Richard 1 of the Best Players Never to Win A Masters 1000 & Slam..
Stan A Poster - Player For Late Bloomers Won Australian Open Aged 28 Years and 10 Months Old..
Il ne lui a pas manqué grand chose...
Even on bh, Stan has better serve, Stan has better fh, Stan is a slightly better overall athlete, both average volleys/oh, mentally I’d give Stan the edge in self belief, so overall, it’s not that close, even though purely on talent, the margins are small
Which massless gasquet’s win even more impressive
on peak form Stan was pretty much unplayable
He denied djokovic's roland garros championship a month earlier. Stan is not a grass player
3:09:25 mexican wave lol
Stan the Man. Too bad ran out of Gas quet.
preciousjey oof!
wawrinka mediocre player on grass
🌞 👦 🖖
Poor Gasquet mom died.
gasquet saved djokovic perfect year,if wawrinka wins here, he beats djokovic and loses to federer
Lol Djokovic would murder him.
@LUCAS LORENS EMILIO CERVERA Based on? When did prime Wawrinka play a Djokovic at Wimby? Besides, at the end of Wimby the grass has detoriated so much it's not as fast anymore. This + the fact he is stylistically a very hard match up for Nole makes me think Stan would have beaten Nole in the semis (had he gotten past Gasquet).
Hunter Eyes yes Wawrinka would’ve beaten Djokovic he was in his head
another troll comment what if that happen and bla bla bla
@@huntereyes875 The Wimbledon is slow compared to 90`s wimbledon.
2015 wimb is in no way even comparable to 2015 RG in speed and bounce.
7:28 kobe
Close. Nicolas Anelka
Pause 3:26:43 lovely legs
Stan returns of serve is piss poor
Federer still has the best one handed backhand
Gasquet haha👎👎👎just one off
Can not stand Gasquet, absolute waster. Stan should have won this, then the semis and then Wimbledon.
jajajajaja good joke, wawrinka wins wimbledon??. No way he is not good enough to win on grass surface
NOT BEATING ROGER ON GRASS. Come on. Needs Berdych in the final. :-)
watching the match make me want to sleep