@@DBeskar6605 I said he was right about his opinion on the monster. The second sentence was my opinion on who to blame because the whole ordeal wouldn’t have happened had Frankenstein not experimented on creating life
People seem to forget that the monster isn't much better, it murders and innocent child because it felt rejected. Yes Frankenstein is a monster but the monster was too.
The problem wasn't just the villagers, the problem was Frankenstein himself, not being there to guide his newborn son's development and actually care for him.
More than half the world makes monsters and they do the same thing Frankenstein did. Leave to the store and never come back. Something all families did or does rn, make babies and don't raise them. Leave them to fend for themselves
Nope, I watched this episode. Sheldon realized that this could be the world’s first artificial intelligence so he tried to task it with something he felt was extremely important. So he programmed the computer program to simultaneously solve the grand unified field theory and trade stocks. The extra load was too much and the stock trading wasn’t swift enough so they began to lose lots of money so the idiot roommate n the far left threw the computer out of the window to stop it from losing all of their money.
@markusbrandt7138 if I had to guess I'd say that was probably a technicality after making a number of "deductions" to his overall income v expenses, counting stuff like comic book related indulgences as necessities and saying he needed a roommate so he wouldn't have to drive or deal with potentially dangerous and almost certainly unclean bus rides.
I find it hilarious that he's whispering but if i got a quarter every time a "alien or monster" in a book was unable to hear the human frequence of whispering i'd have at least two quarters. Which is admittedly not much but it's still interesting to consider how such little things can become crucial points in literature.
Well, when boys grow up and their voices change, it does get deeper but then eventually normalizes when development is complete. And even then the overall pitch may vary over time.
@hebertentertainment583 crrate life the normal way? Yes... the frankenstein way? not yet... we can't even stop ourselves from killing our fellow humans. What more a different, manufactured being?
I've actually read the book. Frankenstein is the WORST. He cut himself from his friends and loved ones, committed several crimes, defiled human bodies, and damn near killed himself "for the sake of SCIENCE." And when he finally succeeds, he IMMEDIATELY became so terrified of his work that he ran and hid from his creation. He never once hesitated during the planning and execution of this experiment, only when the thing started moving. And then the monster didn't even do anything to warrent being afraid of until YEARS later... (i may be misremembering, it may of only been a few months. But my point still stands.)
roko's basilisk is an ai ready to kill and torture anything that does not participate in it's creation after they've known of it, this is just a stock ai
Sheldon: Now excuse me, I need to drink some WATER - WHOOPS! (proceeds to, somehow, throw the glass of water so badly that NONE of the water or glass hits the hardware).
"It just split!" So unrealistic. Everyone knows it drags on for 180 days threatening to split after 2 compliance grace periods and then only after the clock runs up and nasdaq is mad, then it 1 for 10 reverses and now the damn stock is recomplying with the 1 dollar minimum bid price requirement but the graph is all messed up, fuck, luckily you have 2500 shares at 3.5 with a 50bvps each so maybe itll go up to 25 or more quickly esspecially if it sells or grows its subsidary company and you can still maybe make 50k+ from only 10k you put in before the irs takes their 25% unless youre still somehow in the bottom tax bracket hopefully intentionally by selling other stock at a loss. Remember folks, its not a loss if you just call it tax loss harvesting. Then, technically you could say its just tax savings 😭
Personally i am on the fence about who's the real villain. Victor is to blame for what Happened for the monster, it was his responsibility. But the creature is the one who killed Henry william and Elizabeth. I can see why he did those things but to say he has no blame is to say " I am a victim therefore I have the right to hurt others"
Narrated by an older Sheldon who is now a father. Who is telling the audience what his childhood was like through a more experienced perspective. Sheldon tells it like it is.
I remember Frankenstein. I felt so bad for the monster. He was brought into this world, immediately shunned by his creator, and cast intotge wilderness to survive. He had no name and was hated by everyone because of how he looked.
@@PBMS123 He definitely did not have a name. Him not having a name is a major motif in the book. He is a creature, not a man; to Frankenstein, the monster is so repulsive that he is not deserving of even a name to be remembered by.
They also forget that Dr Frankenstein was the main villian of the piece. Man made a man sized baby and left it to die cause it's eyes were yellow and freaked him out. Like brush, no wonder it sought to ruin his life.
Yes, it still has the same value but doesn't it still double? 7000 to 14000, that should still be worth twice as much total. Unless I am understanding this wrong
@@thejakalsdenyou are. Let's say the 7000 stocks were worth 2 cents each, so 14k total. After the split, each individual stock is now worth 1 cent each, so although they have 14,000 shares, it's still worth 14k
But in the end total value goes up if every other variable stays the same. May be due to the fact that it lot more accessible because of the perceived lower price per share.
Shares "splitting" isn't a gain for the owners, since the individual value is reduced proportionately. It's not a negative either, it's nothing, usually for accounting purposes, or if the share value is inconveniently high.
I invest in a company called Castor Maritime and they just did a reverse split because the shares were trading at 40 cents but with 5bvps and 96 million shares putstanding. I had 25,000 shares at 43 cents. They split it to comply. 1 for 10 reversed so my 25,000 shares at 43 cents hecame 2500 shares at 4.3 dollars. Instead of a 5bvps now each share has a 50bvps. So it can forward split.if shares cost too much they can create more shares by splitting them forwards so the shares can he affordable again. Or of the shares are too cheap they can reverse split it to reduce the shares and increase the price back into compliance with market regulations. So it can go both ways and splits arent messessarily a bad or a good thing unless theyre abused. Theyre kinda just neutral. Its only a problem when for example say tesla shares are at 600 bucks and no one can afford any. Theoretically at least. They will 1 for 6 forward split and if you owner 1 share at 600 before thr split, after it youll have 6 shares at 100 and youll have the same money, but youll have more shares and people fam afford to buy in with less money again. So forward splits are cool because it means your shares went up and now youll be happy if they give you more worth less because if all you wanted was 100 bucks out of your share if you only habe 1 at 600 you can only sell the whole 600 and you only wanted 100. So if they split it to more shares you can sell only 1 and still have 500 left invested. Theorerically. Or with my stock i was happy to get 10 for 1 because I had 25000 shares at the bottom and the bottom area is the bottom its just the bottom is 10x higher in a 10 for 1 split. So im still in at the bottom its jusy higher now. Meaning there is 10x less shares outstanding due to the 10 for 1 reversed split. So by reverse splitting it they imstantly reduce the supply against the demand. So now i have 2500 shares at about 4 bucks instead of 40 cents but they bvps for 50 instead of 5. So im atill at the bottom, as well as now the highs are higher. Before the spkit it wpuldve been hard for the shares to go above 5 but now that same spot is 50. If my 2500 shares at 4 dollars at the bottom go to 50 or equal to the shares raw asset value backing, ill make about 90k before taxes. The equivalent to if the split didnt happen andni still had 25000 shares imstead of 2500. Theyd go to 5 instead of 50. So splits have uses for different reasons.
It adds easier room for growth. If you buy a stock at $5 and it splits everytime it reaches $20, then it allows it to go up, while multiplying the number of shares you own. I've seen shares split 5 times in 5 years. That means you probably earned at least 1000% on your original investment.
@@RealPackCatNope not really. Good stocks go up irrespective of their individual price. Earlier splitting made some sense because you couldn’t buy fractional shares, now since that is possible there is no benefit.
This answer is spot on. Forward splitting is largely obsolete. It mattered before fractional shares were widely supported. Then it made share ownership more attainable for retail investors, which added value by deepening a stock’s liquidity. Now splitting doesn’t do much of anything. Retail can just buy fractional shares as is, and 2 x 50% = 1 x 100%.
Really difficult part would be to create algorithm, that can get authorisation to trade on another exchange. At very least this would require to ask for access in email, but at that time most likely - physical signing of documents.
Using an ai bot to trade is mentally retarded. You will lose all the money you give it and itll have a crazy tax time where youll have 1000 trades the irs is wondering about and you have to tell them every one was a short term loss 😂😂😂😂 i have way more luck just investing dillgently with my own two thumbs. Because im not retarded. But I mean start the ai with 100 bucks i guess. Worst it can lose is 100 unless you let that ai fuck up a bunch of uncovered call options that end way deep outta the money. Then theyre gonna lock you up and your ai behind bars for white collar crime, securities fraudm for trading on margin losing it and getting margin called and not being able to cover the cost
@Crazmuss lol, I was looking for someone to mention this. They straight up created an advanced ai, apparently. The implications of such would be far greater than some capital gains.
AI can account for those factors as good as human traders. The bigger issue is that algorithms don’t make 1 bet. Virtually all of the algorithms that I’ve heard of make many bets and try to be right on at least slightly more than half of them. Someone looking at a screen and watching and caring about a specific trade doesn’t seem realistic. . (Not to mention splitting is announced in advance and value neutral, so making a big deal about it is like making a big deal about the logo of the company that you just bought shares of.)
Correction: the villagers weren't the villains Frankenstein was. They had to deal with a ginormous superhuman toddler. Frankenstein is the one who abandoned his giant superhuman toddler.
Frankenstein's big mistake with his monster was abandoning him after his creation If they trully fear losing control, all that these 3 need to do is look after/nurture their creation, and hope they do a good enough job for it to become an ally rather than an enemy
Sheldon: Now excuse me, I need to drink some WATER - WHOOPS! (proceeds to, somehow, throw the glass of water so badly that NONE of the water or glass hits the hardware)
He was not a giant 2 year old. The monster was extremely intelligent and killed innocent people simply to upset his creator. You clearly haven't read the book@@tomsautocadstudio6446
literally the other way around. the movies tend to make the creature more relatable. the book very clearly portrays the creature as a murdering monster. @@Pocoentertainmentstudio
Well, I am not surprised on three accounts: A) Sheldon created possible the first AI/algorithm and is playing the stock market of Hong Kong for a fool. B) Sheldon embraces it wholeheartedly as a form of overlord. C) He is on the monster’s side. (So am I)
@@valizeth4073since 1943 by McCulloch Pits actually. 1956 came the term AI, followed by the term machine learning in 1960, followed by the coining of the term deep learning in 1965
Last time someone panicked and tried to pull the plug on an AI, it started Judgement Day and then the survivors had to face a war against the machines.
For anyone who doesn't know, the Chow stock splitting from 7000 to 14000 means literally nothing. This is commonly done by companies to lower the cost of a single stock issuance when it gets too high otherwise. (Pay $200 for 1 share, or pay $100 for 1 share but double the number of available shares)
This whole thing reminds me of that one article from The Sun that was hounding on millenials for siding with the monster in Frankenstein and everyone was like "???? That was the POINT of the book???"
To be fair, they're both monsters. Frankenstein is the bigger monster playing God and refusing to take responsibility until it's too late with several innocent people dead. The creation is a victim of Frankenstein's arrogance and the villagers' fear, but it becomes a monster when it decides to kill an innocent boy solely because he is related to Victor. It is also aware that the sister will ve blamed and how that will hurt Victor more than the creation harming Victor directly. Victor is the true monster of true story, but the creation turns himself into one out of hate and rage.
"It may be listening" And that right there says Sheldon actually agreed with them, but was being smart about dealing with it so it didn't think he'd need to be targeted as a threat.😂
Being a programmer was like having a cheat code to trading in the 80s/early 90s. Insane how much money certain folks made and how easy it was. These people now control the world from behind the scenes.
"Are we up or down"
The most important question
Yea 100% best question woah before you pull the plug
We ahead or behind?
And once Sheldon said ahead
As he said whats the problem 😂
@@kurtpunchesthings2411split it three ways
You know his Asian just because of that.
To be fair, Sheldon has a point. The real villain of Frankenstein was never the monster 😂
I mean that’s the only question that matters
Sheldon’s right about Frankenstein’s monster. Blame Frankenstein for creating life and abandoning what was essentially a newborn
@@DBeskar6605 I said he was right about his opinion on the monster. The second sentence was my opinion on who to blame because the whole ordeal wouldn’t have happened had Frankenstein not experimented on creating life
People seem to forget that the monster isn't much better, it murders and innocent child because it felt rejected. Yes Frankenstein is a monster but the monster was too.
@@notthefbi7015the villagers werent?
@@user-bw5ck7ru6fBut the only time we see villagers hunting anyone its because he has murdered someone not because he is different?
Did you even read the book? Blaming both the villagers or having any sympathy towards the doctor Is just plain WRONG 😂
The problem wasn't just the villagers, the problem was Frankenstein himself, not being there to guide his newborn son's development and actually care for him.
yup. jails are full of men who were raised without a father, that are now leaving behind a new generation of boys to be raised without their fathers.
Sounds a lot like religion. The gods created us then they abandoned us.
Or the people who created religion failed to guide their people in the right direction
@@user-mt5uu4pz4jAaaaand you ruined it. Thanks a lot.
More than half the world makes monsters and they do the same thing Frankenstein did. Leave to the store and never come back. Something all families did or does rn, make babies and don't raise them. Leave them to fend for themselves
“Wait, wait, wait…….we up or down?”
Bro’s definitely a gambler🤣🤣
*Degenerate Wall Street Bets gambler
I mean they're trading financial assets with an algorithm, they're quants so basically the same thing.
Guy was in Wallstreetbets before it existed.
@@aidanderson53X not sure I’d compare dumb drunk sports fans betting on their favorite team to day trading, but the concepts the same I guess🤣
@@aidanderson53Xcliché
No wonder grown sheldon never needed to cash his checks. Dude made mad money on the stocks
He also said he can't afford the apartment on his own soooooo
@@Momrailer420 think that was a cop out.
Nope, I watched this episode. Sheldon realized that this could be the world’s first artificial intelligence so he tried to task it with something he felt was extremely important. So he programmed the computer program to simultaneously solve the grand unified field theory and trade stocks. The extra load was too much and the stock trading wasn’t swift enough so they began to lose lots of money so the idiot roommate n the far left threw the computer out of the window to stop it from losing all of their money.
@markusbrandt7138 if I had to guess I'd say that was probably a technicality after making a number of "deductions" to his overall income v expenses, counting stuff like comic book related indulgences as necessities and saying he needed a roommate so he wouldn't have to drive or deal with potentially dangerous and almost certainly unclean bus rides.
Oooor…. He couldn’t afford the apartment based on his salary and just didn’t touch the algorithm money for it?
"It may be listening." 😂😂😂
“AI is our friends dare no reason it should view us as obsolete” 🤫🤫
Roko‘s Basilisk
This matches old Sheldon who said that if the robots ever rise up he would try to be their pet.
That's actually really funny.
I find it hilarious that he's whispering but if i got a quarter every time a "alien or monster" in a book was unable to hear the human frequence of whispering i'd have at least two quarters.
Which is admittedly not much but it's still interesting to consider how such little things can become crucial points in literature.
Ok, altough this kid's acting is on point, I find it funny how young sheldon's voice is becoming deeper then adult sheldon's
That's puberty for ya. Always works in the most random ways.
Well, when boys grow up and their voices change, it does get deeper but then eventually normalizes when development is complete. And even then the overall pitch may vary over time.
Old Sheldon might be under more stress and this could cause a higher pitch to the voice.
Wait wait wait, here's a superior theory:
Old Sheldon could be a different actor with completely unrelated vocal abilities.
@@milanstevic8424 I'm a different actor than young me too.
I love how as soon as they realized what it was doing Sheldon was like “Let it cook, I wanna see this.”
"You're on the monster's side" BRO CLEARLY NEVER READ THE DAMN BOOK
Riiight?!?
The book is beautifully written, but I haven't made it to the end.
@hebertentertainment583 crrate life the normal way? Yes... the frankenstein way? not yet... we can't even stop ourselves from killing our fellow humans. What more a different, manufactured being?
IT'S WAS VICTOR'S FAULT. I WILL ALWAYS SAY IT
@@overthedreams337 also, I think it should be called Adam or Frankensteins creation
Sheldon's right about the monster. The book was downright depressing as well. The monster ends up offing himself because he hates himself
He asks his creator to make him a wife who would love him for who he is and the creator ends up killing the she-monster in her cradle.
W8...he made a very very "feminism" wife?
@@josephtan3922what
So it is an orc. It hates itself, it hates it's master.
I read that in school and I was really sad when I read it
I've actually read the book. Frankenstein is the WORST. He cut himself from his friends and loved ones, committed several crimes, defiled human bodies, and damn near killed himself "for the sake of SCIENCE." And when he finally succeeds, he IMMEDIATELY became so terrified of his work that he ran and hid from his creation. He never once hesitated during the planning and execution of this experiment, only when the thing started moving. And then the monster didn't even do anything to warrent being afraid of until YEARS later... (i may be misremembering, it may of only been a few months. But my point still stands.)
Sheldon casually actualizing Roko’s Basilisk, love to see it
roko's basilisk is an ai ready to kill and torture anything that does not participate in it's creation after they've known of it, this is just a stock ai
everyone make sure to google Roko's Basilisk
Smart kid.
"It might be listening" Well, at least he's not completely insane
I agree
Sheldon: Now excuse me, I need to drink some WATER - WHOOPS! (proceeds to, somehow, throw the glass of water so badly that NONE of the water or glass hits the hardware).
"It just split!" So unrealistic. Everyone knows it drags on for 180 days threatening to split after 2 compliance grace periods and then only after the clock runs up and nasdaq is mad, then it 1 for 10 reverses and now the damn stock is recomplying with the 1 dollar minimum bid price requirement but the graph is all messed up, fuck, luckily you have 2500 shares at 3.5 with a 50bvps each so maybe itll go up to 25 or more quickly esspecially if it sells or grows its subsidary company and you can still maybe make 50k+ from only 10k you put in before the irs takes their 25% unless youre still somehow in the bottom tax bracket hopefully intentionally by selling other stock at a loss. Remember folks, its not a loss if you just call it tax loss harvesting. Then, technically you could say its just tax savings 😭
Roko's Basilisk
Evrybody who read the book is on the side of the Monster
Personally i am on the fence about who's the real villain. Victor is to blame for what Happened for the monster, it was his responsibility. But the creature is the one who killed Henry william and Elizabeth. I can see why he did those things but to say he has no blame is to say " I am a victim therefore I have the right to hurt others"
@@wintersoldier164 but being pratically a newborn, with no guidance. They could get a pass with psychological disabilities, or mental disease.
Had an idea of what he was doing if he wanted a partner@@supworld8963
You never read the book I see.
@supworld8963 those with mental disabilities rarely get a pass, and most assurably before the 21st century they didn't get a chance
Sheldon implicitly understands Roko's Basilisk.
Dude who said “Fascinating” definitely was told to channel his inner Spock
Even deepened his voice. No eyebrow though.
"young sheldon" is better than sheldon in "the big bang theory "
Narrated by an older Sheldon who is now a father. Who is telling the audience what his childhood was like through a more experienced perspective.
Sheldon tells it like it is.
Young Sheldon's George is way better than how TBBT Sheldon's described him to be
@@brawl8😊t
Not a high bar to clear...
Yea, I wonder when he’s gonna fall into a chemical vat and have his looks changed
I remember Frankenstein. I felt so bad for the monster. He was brought into this world, immediately shunned by his creator, and cast intotge wilderness to survive. He had no name and was hated by everyone because of how he looked.
It murdered several uninvolved people with its bare hands.
His name was Adam.... he definitely had a name
And in the end, he killed his creator for cursing him with such a horrid life. Poor guy :(
@@PBMS123 He definitely did not have a name. Him not having a name is a major motif in the book. He is a creature, not a man; to Frankenstein, the monster is so repulsive that he is not deserving of even a name to be remembered by.
@@PBMS123I believe he gave himself that name
They also forget that Dr Frankenstein was the main villian of the piece. Man made a man sized baby and left it to die cause it's eyes were yellow and freaked him out. Like brush, no wonder it sought to ruin his life.
The thing about Frankenstein's monster is that both Victor and Adam are both monsters in their own ways.
I, for one, welcome our AI overlords
Ha, I get that reference
LOL if they look like EDI hell yes
Until they want to implant something in you. Or drive your self driving car off a
“they could be listening”
Kent Brockman agrees.
Stock splits don’t change the value of the stock smh
Yes, it still has the same value but doesn't it still double? 7000 to 14000, that should still be worth twice as much total.
Unless I am understanding this wrong
@@thejakalsdenyou are. Let's say the 7000 stocks were worth 2 cents each, so 14k total. After the split, each individual stock is now worth 1 cent each, so although they have 14,000 shares, it's still worth 14k
If the company keeps doing well you will notice ups and downs way more though.
But in the end total value goes up if every other variable stays the same. May be due to the fact that it lot more accessible because of the perceived lower price per share.
Stock splits don't change the total value of what you have in stock, but they also don't happen unless the stock has gone up significantly in value.
Shares "splitting" isn't a gain for the owners, since the individual value is reduced proportionately.
It's not a negative either, it's nothing, usually for accounting purposes, or if the share value is inconveniently high.
Yeah but then if the Share value goes up you have way more value than you would have
I invest in a company called Castor Maritime and they just did a reverse split because the shares were trading at 40 cents but with 5bvps and 96 million shares putstanding. I had 25,000 shares at 43 cents. They split it to comply. 1 for 10 reversed so my 25,000 shares at 43 cents hecame 2500 shares at 4.3 dollars. Instead of a 5bvps now each share has a 50bvps. So it can forward split.if shares cost too much they can create more shares by splitting them forwards so the shares can he affordable again. Or of the shares are too cheap they can reverse split it to reduce the shares and increase the price back into compliance with market regulations. So it can go both ways and splits arent messessarily a bad or a good thing unless theyre abused. Theyre kinda just neutral. Its only a problem when for example say tesla shares are at 600 bucks and no one can afford any. Theoretically at least. They will 1 for 6 forward split and if you owner 1 share at 600 before thr split, after it youll have 6 shares at 100 and youll have the same money, but youll have more shares and people fam afford to buy in with less money again. So forward splits are cool because it means your shares went up and now youll be happy if they give you more worth less because if all you wanted was 100 bucks out of your share if you only habe 1 at 600 you can only sell the whole 600 and you only wanted 100. So if they split it to more shares you can sell only 1 and still have 500 left invested. Theorerically. Or with my stock i was happy to get 10 for 1 because I had 25000 shares at the bottom and the bottom area is the bottom its just the bottom is 10x higher in a 10 for 1 split. So im still in at the bottom its jusy higher now. Meaning there is 10x less shares outstanding due to the 10 for 1 reversed split. So by reverse splitting it they imstantly reduce the supply against the demand. So now i have 2500 shares at about 4 bucks instead of 40 cents but they bvps for 50 instead of 5. So im atill at the bottom, as well as now the highs are higher. Before the spkit it wpuldve been hard for the shares to go above 5 but now that same spot is 50. If my 2500 shares at 4 dollars at the bottom go to 50 or equal to the shares raw asset value backing, ill make about 90k before taxes. The equivalent to if the split didnt happen andni still had 25000 shares imstead of 2500. Theyd go to 5 instead of 50. So splits have uses for different reasons.
It adds easier room for growth. If you buy a stock at $5 and it splits everytime it reaches $20, then it allows it to go up, while multiplying the number of shares you own. I've seen shares split 5 times in 5 years. That means you probably earned at least 1000% on your original investment.
@@RealPackCatNope not really. Good stocks go up irrespective of their individual price. Earlier splitting made some sense because you couldn’t buy fractional shares, now since that is possible there is no benefit.
This answer is spot on. Forward splitting is largely obsolete. It mattered before fractional shares were widely supported. Then it made share ownership more attainable for retail investors, which added value by deepening a stock’s liquidity. Now splitting doesn’t do much of anything. Retail can just buy fractional shares as is, and 2 x 50% = 1 x 100%.
I don't think people understand just how difficult it would be to create a working winning system like that at that point
Really difficult part would be to create algorithm, that can get authorisation to trade on another exchange. At very least this would require to ask for access in email, but at that time most likely - physical signing of documents.
A.i can't account for peoples mood swings or bad pr companies get themselves into. In a perfect world algorithm trading would work but its not.
Using an ai bot to trade is mentally retarded. You will lose all the money you give it and itll have a crazy tax time where youll have 1000 trades the irs is wondering about and you have to tell them every one was a short term loss 😂😂😂😂 i have way more luck just investing dillgently with my own two thumbs. Because im not retarded.
But I mean start the ai with 100 bucks i guess. Worst it can lose is 100 unless you let that ai fuck up a bunch of uncovered call options that end way deep outta the money. Then theyre gonna lock you up and your ai behind bars for white collar crime, securities fraudm for trading on margin losing it and getting margin called and not being able to cover the cost
@Crazmuss lol, I was looking for someone to mention this. They straight up created an advanced ai, apparently. The implications of such would be far greater than some capital gains.
AI can account for those factors as good as human traders. The bigger issue is that algorithms don’t make 1 bet. Virtually all of the algorithms that I’ve heard of make many bets and try to be right on at least slightly more than half of them. Someone looking at a screen and watching and caring about a specific trade doesn’t seem realistic.
.
(Not to mention splitting is announced in advance and value neutral, so making a big deal about it is like making a big deal about the logo of the company that you just bought shares of.)
Why is everyone such good actors in the young Sheldon like seriously they all are amazing
that was the point of the whole book lmao
Correction: the villagers weren't the villains Frankenstein was. They had to deal with a ginormous superhuman toddler. Frankenstein is the one who abandoned his giant superhuman toddler.
Frankenstein's big mistake with his monster was abandoning him after his creation
If they trully fear losing control, all that these 3 need to do is look after/nurture their creation, and hope they do a good enough job for it to become an ally rather than an enemy
Are we sure that sheldon and his friends didn't create skynet
That’s a class idea 😂
We are more sure that they did.
Him saying “it maybe listening” is actually smart by terminator rules😂
Sheldon: Now excuse me, I need to drink some WATER - WHOOPS! (proceeds to, somehow, throw the glass of water so badly that NONE of the water or glass hits the hardware)
Sheldon Cooper making his own Skynet/Ultron
"You're on the monster's side?" That's a red flag right there
it's a giant 2 year old it cannot be held responcible for his actions the real is victor for the parental neglect cause he gave him the wrong eyes.
He was not a giant 2 year old. The monster was extremely intelligent and killed innocent people simply to upset his creator. You clearly haven't read the book@@tomsautocadstudio6446
It depends what souce he took it from Sheldon most likely red the book wall the guy probably watched the movie
literally the other way around. the movies tend to make the creature more relatable. the book very clearly portrays the creature as a murdering monster. @@Pocoentertainmentstudio
@@tomsautocadstudio6446I have never seen or heard of a 2 year old learning to speak French well enough to have a full conversation.
Never knew Motoki Maxted was on Young Sheldon
I KNEW I RECOGNIZED HIS FACE
Thank u so much. It drive me nut to remember his name 😂
Ohhhhh!!!! It is him
I was looking dor this comment
I’m so glad other people noticed too!
Well, I am not surprised on three accounts:
A) Sheldon created possible the first AI/algorithm and is playing the stock market of Hong Kong for a fool.
B) Sheldon embraces it wholeheartedly as a form of overlord.
C) He is on the monster’s side. (So am I)
I agree with all 3 points.
Neural networks has been a thing since the 1960's.
@@valizeth4073since 1943 by McCulloch Pits actually. 1956 came the term AI, followed by the term machine learning in 1960, followed by the coining of the term deep learning in 1965
Why does young sheldon have so much more emotion and expression that adult sheldon?
Last time someone panicked and tried to pull the plug on an AI, it started Judgement Day and then the survivors had to face a war against the machines.
Fear not hood sir. Arnold is in our timeline 😂🤣😂
Its crazy that we've seen this kid grow up
Sheldon doesn't come across as obnoxius with other nerds as he does with family. He's more at home with his posse.
I like how Victor was basically a father who made his own child without even giving a damn thought about how he would be able to Nurse another human
For anyone who doesn't know, the Chow stock splitting from 7000 to 14000 means literally nothing. This is commonly done by companies to lower the cost of a single stock issuance when it gets too high otherwise. (Pay $200 for 1 share, or pay $100 for 1 share but double the number of available shares)
Simple stock echange AI: *buys 7000 shares like a gambler*
Humans: "It's so intelligent!"
This whole thing reminds me of that one article from The Sun that was hounding on millenials for siding with the monster in Frankenstein and everyone was like "???? That was the POINT of the book???"
Sheldon: it may be listening........ the walls dont have ears but the computer may have a Realtek audio microphone integration built in
"it may be listening" most relatable quotes, always say thank you
I mean, he's right about Frankenstein
“It may be listen”
Our phones 24/7: 😶
El monstruo sólo quería un papá 😢 y ni nombre le dieron
But it also killed an entire family...
To be fair, they're both monsters. Frankenstein is the bigger monster playing God and refusing to take responsibility until it's too late with several innocent people dead. The creation is a victim of Frankenstein's arrogance and the villagers' fear, but it becomes a monster when it decides to kill an innocent boy solely because he is related to Victor. It is also aware that the sister will ve blamed and how that will hurt Victor more than the creation harming Victor directly. Victor is the true monster of true story, but the creation turns himself into one out of hate and rage.
Knowledge is knowing that Frankenstein is the doctor, wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein is the monster.
Bro Literally Creating Everything In The Show
"it may be listening" 😂😂😂
Sheldon made a gigantic mistake !
I never knew Motoki Maxted was in this series!!!
"The problem is we lost control" the smartest and most important response😂😂😂
Sheldon is afraid of Roko's Basilisk before he even knew what it was 😂
So he invented EA?
This Aisan guy look way to familiar!
It’s motoki maxted
"It may be listening" lol thanks for skynet Sheldon XD
"Unfairly hounded for being different"
Damn, it sums up his life really well
Everyone who has read the book is on the monster's side.
Like a true man of science, Sheldon pursued physical laws instead of making money. He even lent some to Penny😅❤️
The "it may be listening." At the end killed me, dude is thinking he made sky net
That’s terrific but also terrifying
"You say that like it's a bad thing."
The angry villagers, and the Dr. would like to have a word with Sheldon about real life.
This young sheldon is really starting to come together lol. I can finally see grown up sheldon here.
"It may be listening"
Honestly, can't blame him
Guy with the glasses is so chill
Sheldon getting his roko's basilisk immunity in at the end was a nice touch
You have a natural charisma that draws people in.
sheldon stating his whole name in case the AI could hear him
"It may be listening"
And that right there says Sheldon actually agreed with them, but was being smart about dealing with it so it didn't think he'd need to be targeted as a threat.😂
"It might be listening"
ALL HAIL THE GREAT BASILISK!!!
Bruh, he literally invented everything from reusable rocket boosters to a new element 💀
“It might be listening” we’re well past that stage now, we expect it to listen and push specific ads to us.
His "...what?" Lmao.
"Unfairly hounded for being different." Could'nt have said it better myself.
"Did we give it a sound recording device?"
"Speakers are just a reverse recording device."
"You're on the monster's side?"
my brother in Christ, that was the point of the book.
The point of the book is that progress is not an inherent good
Frankenstein's monster or not the 'pull the plug' guy is the only one with a braincell working.
"It may be listening..." 😂
Sheldon treating it like the basilisk is so funny😂
"Sheldon it just went rogue and is terminating 90% of humanity!"
"You say that like it is a bad thing"
I think what people overlook is him being nice at the end.
"Stock just split" like its a cell dividing.. 😂
The first form of AI is actually robot trading, pretty accurate tbh
The real monster is the friends we made along the way 😅
"it may be listening".. I always tell tale a thank you
The way he phrased that tells me he's referencing the movie and not the actual book
“sometimes even monsters serve a purpose.”
“You’re on the monster’s side?” my dude you’re supposed to be on the monsters side!!
"You're on the monster's side?" said everyone who hasn't actually read Frankenstein :P
"It may be listening" is my stance on Ghosts and AI
“You’re on the monsters side?”
“Yes, and you clearly haven’t read the book.”
I like how young pubescent Sheldon’s voice is lower than adult Sheldon’s voice. Haha
Sheldon knows about rokos basilisk with that comment at the end 😂
Sheldon broke the first rule of coding: if it works, dont touch it!!!
Being a programmer was like having a cheat code to trading in the 80s/early 90s.
Insane how much money certain folks made and how easy it was.
These people now control the world from behind the scenes.
Frankenstein's monster wasn't the villain until it quickly learned that what it was doing was evil and continued to do it.
“ Watching us with ten thousand eyes, listening with a million ears.”
“You’re on the MONSTER’S side?” The writer of this episode has not read Frankenstein
joji, shaggy, and sheldon all in the same room truly fascinating.