Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Is Saudi Arabia on the madhab of Imam Ahmad or on the manhaj of salaf? | Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 08. 2022
- May Allah preserve Shaykh Salih al Fawzan and may Allah reward the brother for translating this video for our channel.
بارك الله فيك
Very good Channel btw
Post more ان شاء الله 🤩❤️
Clear and straightforward. Jazakallahu Khayran.
Allahhu Akbar.! Crystal Clear definition. Alhamdulillah.!
Correctly put.🥇🏅🏆🌹👌👍
May Allah preserve the shaykh. May Allah aid the shaykh. May Allah grant the shaykh (and his family) Jannatul Firdaus.. Allahumma Ameen
To the point and crystal clear answer barakhallah Fee 👍
May Allah have mercy on our scholars
May Allah SWT cure the Muslims and grant them understanding and unity.
Masha Allah Tabarakalllah
THE ANSWER IS OBVIOUS ANYONE WITH A BASIC OF ISLAMIC KNOWLEDGE WOULD'VE KNOW THIS.
In other words they think they know better than imam Ahmad to correct him and not take his "mistakes". Ya shayx where did you get all this knowledge from? How many hadith have you even memorized?
If he doesn’t make mistakes he is an Angel
Don’t be a fanatic, the imams are humans and can make mistakes. Learn to listen, in the video he literally said that even when they make a mistake they still get 1 good deed
What about you ya akhi? How many have you memorized?
Beautiful answer
السلام عليكم
أنا طالب العلم في الهند
أنا أدرس في كلية دار الأرقم الإسلامية
اريد ان أرى الشيخ صالح فوزان حفظه الله إن شاء الله
اکتب ان شاءاللہ،لا انشاء
Allahuma barik lahu.
i have a question… most saudis are hanbali i heard, but there exist some malikis in the eastern province? since i‘m maliki. would people in riyadh for example care if i prayed sadl. because i want to go there inshaAllah sometime
They probably will, but if you tell them youre maliki InShaAllah there will be no problen
Well, not sure most Saudis are Shafi actually.
It is becoming more and more true.
But eastern province of Al Ahsa, is mostly Shafi, followed by a large Shia population, Maliki and Hanafis
Also, the southern province of Najran Al Yaman, is mainly Zaydi Shia.
Hejaz is mainly Shafi and Maliki.
And Najd is Hanbali.
It is after Mohammed bin Abdulwahabs conquest that the other Madhaahibs died down and the Najdi Hanbali madhab was imposed by the government.
Jizak Allahu khayran for the benefits.
Now Fools like Muqalideen such as Al-karamiyyah, Mo'tazela perhaps Even the Ash'irah and Maturid will take the sheikh out of context and claim that he insult the 4 Imams by saying "they made mistakes" to clarify the point that our scholars are not infallible.
I've seen the muqalidoon tactics. May Allah grant me and you all a deeper understanding. Ameen.
This is called 'damage limitation' from this deceitful person. Fawzan & his dead associates uthaymeen & binBaz are on the "manhaj" of albani who expounded Salafiyyah and went against the Madhabs and called it "Blind Following". He knows that his group were wrong and is now backtracking a bit by saying that the 4 Imams made mistakes rather than the Madhabs are mistaken.
@@mikhan5191 I maybe wrong but I also heard various salafis saying that they don't follow taqleed and imams like this.
But I m also lil surprised to see this video...Maybe I don't have enough knowledge
May Allah show us correct path
@@carbene4598 - if you were around during the 1980's, you would hear & see Salafis openly going around saying that Blind Following of Madhabs was an evil bidah & they hated Umar (ra) for inventing new bid'ahs such as Tarawih etc.
Salafiyyah is actually an anti Islamic group setup to CHANGE Islam from within!
That will happen if you are fed up with false information and propaganda, Muqallidoon also says they committed mistakes but that mistake has already been corrected by the people who came after them and their students, now we will listen to them rather than a so called Mujaddid born in British colonial period...
Unfortunately the Hanafees don't follow the Aqeedah of Imam Abu Hanifa (rahimahulla) and are following the deviant ashari maturidi. So, they should correct themselves.
@@j0kez708in india majority in fiqh they follow imam abu Hanifa but in aqeedah they follow asharis and maturidi if u want to check them ask any barelvi devbandi any deviant sect (where is allah?)
u will know their aqeedah
@@Cell-dh7yk Bro. Barelvi are not Muslims. They are mushrik. They call themselves sunni but they are. Kaafir.
@@Cell-dh7yk Talk to me about Sunni deobandi.
majority of malikis and shafis are also asharis.Asharis are the majority of ahlus sunnah.However it is the hobby of wahhabis to make takfir on muslims whilst kissing the feet of yahood
@@Cell-dh7ykAll of malikis shafis and hanafis are either ashari or matutidi.For you to make such blatant takfir on them is to try and oust vast majority of ahlussunnah out of the folds of islam.From your words it seems you have made conclusions based on very little knowledge.To call asharis and maturidis deviant is a sign of deviance itself as you are making takfeer on majority of ummah
Does anyone have a reference to the concept discussed at 0:43 ? Or somewhere I can learn more about it
Narrated `Amr bin Al-`As:
That he heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "If a judge gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is correct (i.e. agrees with Allah and His Apostle's verdict) he will receive a double reward, and if he gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is wrong, (i.e. against that of Allah and His Apostle) even then he will get a reward ."
Sahih al-Bukhari 7352
Amr b. al-'As reported that he heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:
When a judge gives a decision, having tried his best to decide correctly and is right, there are two rewards for him; and if he gave a judgment after having tried his best (to arrive at a correct decision) but erred, there is one reward for him.
Sahih Muslim 1716 a
@@AdDehlawi JazakhAllah khair
@@redwon Ameen wa iyyak
Is it true they follow hanbali fiqh ?
The wahhabis think that they are ahlus sunnah wal jamaah and falsely claim that they follow the Hanbali mazhab. Of course there are pure followers of the Hanbali mazhab as there are for the other three mazahib in Saudi Arabia.
@@tokyukvitz88مشكلتك ما تعرف تقرا عربي ولا تستطيع التمييز بين المذاهب والخلافات المذهبية الفقهية وسامع كلام من شيخ مسجدك وتبينته بدون بحث او اطلاع وهذا جهل
Saudi Arabia? Madhhab of the Munafiqun
SubhanAllah, I never knew Imam Ahmad was from the salaf. I only thought the first two (Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik) were from the salaf. Were Imam Al- Shafi and Imam Ahmad tabiat- tabiyeen then?
Imam Al Shafi was a tabi' al-tabi'ee because he learned directly from Imam Malik. Imam Abu Hanifah was born later compared to the other 3 imams, in 164 AH, and he is also from the tabi' al-tabi'een. For reference, Imam al Bukhari was born in 194, and is also a tabi al-tabi'ee. So yes, all 4 of them are from the salaf al-salih.
@@spartanbeast3575 What r u talking about? Abu hanifa was the oldest of the imams and hence the 1st one. Imam ahmad was the youngest. And I doubt he studied from Imam malik. Coz Imam malik died when Imam ahmad was 15.
@@maazmustafa2322 Nowhere did I say that Imam Ahmad studied from Imam Malik. What I said is that Imam Shafi studied from Malik.
As for Imam Abu Hanifah, you're right. I made a mistake after double checking. He was born before the other imams, so he is also a tabi'ee.
@@spartanbeast3575 my bad bro. My bad
@@maazmustafa2322 It's ok dw about it, we both made a mistake so let's call it even.
What mistakes...can anyone please
Humanly mistake akhi
Thank you brother
Ijtihadi mistakes anybody can do that and it's normal
As salamu alaykum, the problem here in Germany is, that the ashariyya and maturidiyya claiming, that they're acting upon the madhab of Abu Hanifah rahimahullah. But it is clearly a mix with sufism of their Shaykh Nazim Haqqani.
May Allah ta'alaa prevent our noble Shaykh Fawzaan, amiin.
Nazim Haqqani doesn’t even represent proper sufism. His way is Barelvi shirk.
Assalamualaikum bro
I have heard that in Germany the cult of Ahmadiya is spreading (they don't accept prophet muhammad as last messenger but some ghulam Ahmed qadiyani) is that true?
Imam Abu Hanifa was SALAFI in Aqeeda ( Fiqhul Akbar by Abu Hanifa). Other 3 Imams were also Salafi in Aqeeda.
The Hanafi's are lying to public. Modern hanafi follow Abu Hanifa in FIQH only, but in Aqeeda, they are Ashary- Maturidy. Hanafis reject Abu Hanifa's aqeeda ( Salafi).
Ashary -Maturidy aqeeda began after 300 Hijry. So, before 300 hijry, no one, no muslim knew what this Ashary-maturidy aqeeda was.
Ulama e Deoband is following authentic hanafism and sunnism, the correct version
@@QamruddinKhan-hf4dn the original Deobandi school of thought is sound except that it differs from the Salaf on Asma wa Sifaat.
Taqleed is ignorance
There is a difference between blind taqleed and taqleed while striving to learn more knowledge. One is blameworthy, the other is praiseworthy. All 4 imams spoke against blind taqleed. Taqleed while striving for knowledge is praiseworthy as long as you adhere to what goes in line with the Qur'an and sunnah, and abandon what goes against the Qur'an and sunnah after learning the daleel from the Qur'an and sunnah against them.
Taqleed of the scholars is praiseworthy, while taqleed of the followers is blameworthy. There are some cases where the followers of a maddhab do certain actions that those scholars never taught. In that case, it's wajib on those with knowledge to advise them against doing so and to stick with the true teachings of the Qur'an and sunnah.
For example, some Muslims believe that eating crabs, shrimp and lobsters is haram because they resemble insects, when in fact Allah made halal everything that comes from the sea. That sort of taqleed is blameworthy if the person knows the evidence from the Qur'an and rejects it. If the person doesn't know, then the sin is not on that person as long as he doesn't know. If you come across people who believe certain things like that, it is obligatory to advise them if you know the daleel from the Qur'an and sunnah.
@@tayyaba.5058 top class reply to an ignorant
"dont take from me but take from where I have taken" ~Imam Ahmad [rh]
@@mujtabaraisani7376this is not applicable to ignorant common people who seemingly hold themselves in high regard yet don’t even know arabic.
When salafi say it's written in sahih bukhari..... Hanafi say I am muqallid of abu hanifa ra. my hujjad is to follow abu hanifa than imam bukhari ra. ..... That correct indication of ignorance