The National person keeps talks building more houses. National since 1984 to 2017 reduced state housing construction. Also our population increased by 1 m or there abouts. This created a shortage as well.
29:35 "Is Nationals tax policy credible"? Seymour "I don't think it matters" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 29:58 Q "are their Revenue projections credible?" Seymour "look I haven't seen their workings" 42:57 Robertson "I also brought along Act's alternative budget, two things from there... " 1:17:00 National: "The best way to get more housing... sell them to overseas buyers"
In 1984 Labour took over from National with with difficult economic situation. National took over from Labour in 2009 with national debt of 10 billion but left office with 60 billion plus GST was changed to 15%. The Labour governments since 1984 have increased Statehouse stock . National has reduced the stock at times or held the number as constant although the population increased. Interest rates are similar to the average rates over the last 30 years. Currently. During 2009 to 2017 the average interest rate was 6%.
Why does the Act and National teams not want pause deposits into the super fund ? Why not put 14 billion into it rather reduce income taxes. Recall what National did in 1975!
Interesting how National and Act couldn't even answer the first question about what THEY would do, they just dogged Labour for a majority of their speech and then talked in vague bumper sticker promises with no substance of specific actions
I have a question for everyone. Name one country in the Western world that is not in a recession at the moment. Name one country that did well during COVID. National has no policy they always say labour this labour that. No policy, no strategy. I am glad we had labour during COVID. Under National a lot of people would have died. John key caused the housing mess and Luxon will finish US, not it off. Labour or Greens for me. I will not vote for a party with no visible policy
OMG ... Can someone please tell me who to vote for. I spend $200 a week (at the moment) on bloody petrol to go to work, I live in a caravan at a campground with zero change of getting a house and the last thing I can afford is food. I work in mental health and those people on benefits are far safer than I am. I just don't know who to vote for.
Greens or Maori party Universal basic income and housing for all. Wealth redistribution will stop so much inequality which is the cause of many of our social issues too.
Labour, Greens and Maori party put us in this terrible position, and have already hugely indebted the country that will created more poverty for years to come. Go for anyone but them
We do not do Maori and homosexuals because we are too busy working for the good of the Nation. Labour divideds and spends irresponsibly on social and iwi.
Look David, money is there to spend not sit in the cubbard. Labour spend to help alot of things. Everytime Labour give, people always moan, not enough, should do more. Too greedy.
The problem is the results, not the spending. Labour never takes itself into account regarding spending and they always dodge questions about the results of government spending given statistics appear to show a very underwhelming result.
^ Typical Labour voter. Financially illiterate. Labour are spending borrowed money not money from a cupboard. Racking up debt with zero outcomes. Bring on the change!
@@digiratinz Country's need debt. It's much easier to pay for things later once the thing has boosted our economy. But im also not happy with how labour spent our money. If we devide our national debt by the number of people in NZ. We have $25,000 of national debt per person.
Anyone who wants to vote for a party that still has not produced a budget and policies a week before elections is simply a biased person. Luxon cannot answer a question, in this case Nicola has failed to give any numbers. Yes labour is not perfect but based on what New Zealand went through the John key era and now Luxon who has no ability to run an airline let alone a country. Wake up New Zealand. A country is made up of upper middle and low class, under national there will be the rich and poor only and no middle class. He is only worried about his rich mates. Why do yo7 think think this debate was done in QT. The Audience are clapping for Nicola yet she said nothing just like her boss
No surprises there.He knows his days as Finance Minister are numbered?I wonder why ? He should be able to work it out for himself.Labour is finished as a government.Even Jacinda could see the writing on the wall.
We don't WANT National to sell $20B of our properties overseas.
Selling our land to give tax cuts. here today, gone forever.
The National person keeps talks building more houses. National since 1984 to 2017 reduced state housing construction. Also our population increased by 1 m or there abouts. This created a shortage as well.
Property values! West Tamaki Rd. AUCKLAND. Most of these properties are valued at $2 million. So purchase price for overseas people is too low.
29:35 "Is Nationals tax policy credible"? Seymour "I don't think it matters" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
29:58 Q "are their Revenue projections credible?" Seymour "look I haven't seen their workings"
42:57 Robertson "I also brought along Act's alternative budget, two things from there... "
1:17:00 National: "The best way to get more housing... sell them to overseas buyers"
Great analysis. I know who I am voting for. I want to own a house and not to rent one from a foreigner
@RNZ Thanks for broadcasting the occasional election video. Is it possible to put ALL of the available ones in a playlist?
No mention of the banks in a financial debate?!
Employers have said many unemployed don't have skills and Employers will not train them.
In 1984 Labour took over from National with with difficult economic situation. National took over from Labour in 2009 with national debt of 10 billion but left office with 60 billion plus GST was changed to 15%.
The Labour governments since 1984 have increased Statehouse stock . National has reduced the stock at times or held the number as constant although the population increased.
Interest rates are similar to the average rates over the last 30 years. Currently. During 2009 to 2017 the average interest rate was 6%.
I like Grant Robertson clapping the other pannellists. Man with awareness and character above the others.
Then gave stats.
Why does the Act and National teams not want pause deposits into the super fund ? Why not put 14 billion into it rather reduce income taxes. Recall what National did in 1975!
Why is Act slient on tax evasion?
Some farmers use alternative pasture management which result lower fertilizer but maintains their incomes.
bro spamming the whole comment section lmao
David Seymour just proved to a National follower. He should just join National. He agrees with Nicola. What has Nicola said.
Interesting how National and Act couldn't even answer the first question about what THEY would do, they just dogged Labour for a majority of their speech and then talked in vague bumper sticker promises with no substance of specific actions
Yes. If the harbour bridge tolls was not removed. We would have funds to build North Shore transport needs."National stopped it"
RNZ if you don't want to die, CZcams is where to promote yourself.
You should have all your programmes. People search for news here.
also please fix the mics for the next one. Jack Tames mic was way to loud and everyone else had them quite
Tax cut we need it , this country is too expensive and you are working hard to see half of your salary off.
Wheres winston?
Who ?
Who?
At the other debate
I have a question for everyone. Name one country in the Western world that is not in a recession at the moment. Name one country that did well during COVID. National has no policy they always say labour this labour that. No policy, no strategy. I am glad we had labour during COVID. Under National a lot of people would have died. John key caused the housing mess and Luxon will finish US, not it off. Labour or Greens for me. I will not vote for a party with no visible policy
OMG ... Can someone please tell me who to vote for. I spend $200 a week (at the moment) on bloody petrol to go to work, I live in a caravan at a campground with zero change of getting a house and the last thing I can afford is food. I work in mental health and those people on benefits are far safer than I am. I just don't know who to vote for.
Greens or Maori party Universal basic income and housing for all. Wealth redistribution will stop so much inequality which is the cause of many of our social issues too.
@@adelekelly455Thanks so much
With national $250 extra in your pocket a fortnight
Labour, Greens and Maori party put us in this terrible position, and have already hugely indebted the country that will created more poverty for years to come. Go for anyone but them
NZ loyal
1percent transaction tax policy
Look them up .. worth a look I promise you 😊
We all know whoses going to forum government this election cycle. Who do you think will form Government next election?
Wealth tax over 5m, not 2m!
Recall parental leave entitlement has increased and payments to parents at home have increased.
ACT will make 15 k unemployed, this affect 15 k families.
All useless bureaocrats, cheaper to pay them the dole or go find a productive job to help improve our economy.
And the crowd applauded that. We all know where the crowd is from and who they are voting for
We do not do Maori and homosexuals because we are too busy working for the good of the Nation. Labour divideds and spends irresponsibly on social and iwi.
10 mins ranting in the beginning. What nonsense
How tf this take like 5 days to upload
Because of infrastructure
Fkn joke😊
Really!
Look David, money is there to spend not sit in the cubbard. Labour spend to help alot of things. Everytime Labour give, people always moan, not enough, should do more. Too greedy.
The problem is the results, not the spending. Labour never takes itself into account regarding spending and they always dodge questions about the results of government spending given statistics appear to show a very underwhelming result.
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
@@deathsoulger1 I'll drink to that 🍹
^ Typical Labour voter. Financially illiterate. Labour are spending borrowed money not money from a cupboard. Racking up debt with zero outcomes. Bring on the change!
@@digiratinz Country's need debt. It's much easier to pay for things later once the thing has boosted our economy. But im also not happy with how labour spent our money. If we devide our national debt by the number of people in NZ. We have $25,000 of national debt per person.
Anyone who wants to vote for a party that still has not produced a budget and policies a week before elections is simply a biased person. Luxon cannot answer a question, in this case Nicola has failed to give any numbers. Yes labour is not perfect but based on what New Zealand went through the John key era and now Luxon who has no ability to run an airline let alone a country. Wake up New Zealand. A country is made up of upper middle and low class, under national there will be the rich and poor only and no middle class. He is only worried about his rich mates. Why do yo7 think think this debate was done in QT. The Audience are clapping for Nicola yet she said nothing just like her boss
Greens know how to sell a pipe dream.
Yes.They are so naive and ignorant of basic economics.
NO to Labour RUin it for you!
Vote greens
Why?
@@deathsoulger1because communism
Never in a billion years.Its a party of cranks.
Another useless tree hugger envious of people who get off their arses and work hard all their lives only to be extorted by the marxist bludgers.
everyone is over you Grant. Notice the little round of applause he was getting
No surprises there.He knows his days as Finance Minister are numbered?I wonder why ? He should be able to work it out for himself.Labour is finished as a government.Even Jacinda could see the writing on the wall.