I love how everyone is commenting on the censorship. My guess is that they don’t want people to know how to open these casks up if they get the chance.
+John Smith Just an educational fact for you guys out there, these parts of the vessells are normally blurred for because their design is a company secret (I've heard it could be a security concern as well, but I believe each company asks that they not be recorded since they invest quite heavily in the designs).
Jess Vagnar No, you are wrong, its because these machine can double as sex bots and the images are considered to be vulgar xxx images. I have seen this happen on the news before when someone's pants falls down like on the TV show cops.
The parts that were blurred were blurred because they are key design features that are trademarks of the architect. They were blurred to prevent, not only corporate espionage, but also military espionage
The soothing music makes me confident that I can now open a can of slightly expired tuna. I'll use 12 grain bread as the white bread hits the eject button in my colon.
95TurboSol I have a fear of holes and other items that look unnatural in the water so I think I'll pass lol..... The radiation doesn't seem so bad tho lol
cherry twitter I can relate, I used to be terrified of pool drains as a kid, I always heard news stories of peoples hair getting sucked into them and they drowned, it gave me nightmares lol
Some say, we forgot to build the plant on stable solid ground away from the ocean, but they can never deny we totally mastered the periodical removal of nuclear fuel at the speed of 1 cm/s. TEPCO.
Anybody else getting a really condescending vibe from the narrator? "We are smart, and you are dumb. We know what we are doing, so don't you worry now." It's like, they fucked up royally, both in terms of engineering and in their safety practices. Yet they still feel the need to give themselves a handjob over their handling of THEIR own mess.
+acronus But... what if they *are* smart? And... what if you *are* dumb? I mean... can you build a nuclear power plant? Don't mean to defend them or to insult you or anything... just saying....
Lightspectre1 Can I build a nuclear reactor? That's a foolish and simplistic question that completely misses the mark. There isn't a single human being on this planet that has all the necessary skill sets to design and build a nuclear reactor. A project that large would be broken down into sections or categories. Point is, I'm not a nuclear engineer, but neither is the guy that wrote the script for this. I know I could have done a better job. Most people could.
Okay. Fine. Can you make any *components* used to build a reactor? Can you tell them how to do better? All I'm saying is that it's pretty easy to say they fucked up. It's much harder to understand why they made the decisions that they did and make a concrete, cost effective suggestions for how to do better. One is constructive. The other is a waste of time. Am I correct?
Lightspectre1 By trade, I'm a millwright. I work on pumps, gear boxes, elevators, etc. I've worked on / installed large scale cooling equipment in production plants before. Tolerances, specifications, and material and equipment choices would be be far more strict in the design and construction of a nuclear facility. But the basic process would be the same. As stated before, I'm not a nuclear engineer, and I also have hindsight on my side, but here's a few things that could have been done to make it safer. 1. Decommission or update the plant. It was built in 1967, and a lot of the systems used were out of date. 2. Not build it right on the coast. Especially in a country that's prone to earthquakes and tsunamis. 3. Not build build the plant right over an enormous underground aquifer. 4. The backup generators were the last line of defense in a catastrophe, and they were taken out easily. And their last ditch backup, batteries, were ineffective. Fixing any one of those mentioned above could have diverted disaster. And that is why they have no fucking right to act smug. I'm done with this.
The operation was completed as scheduled in December of 2014. The storage pool, which held all the spent fuel used by Unit 4 as well as its next fuel load (reactor 4 was empty at the time of the tsunami). That fuel is now stored in another new pool on the Fukushima plant grounds, well behind (and above) the plant.
@@puncheex2 The photo's show everything blown into smithereens. It spews death forever. (And Tons of Plutonium were blown into the sky in every direction. Japan is not safe. )
@@IExposeMormonism You have no idea about the words you so cavalierly throw around. Get off your emoting and try to convince me with science, if that is your goal.
@@puncheex2 See if you can find any evidence of their claims of success.. I trust nothing they say or show.. Fuku Japan is spewing plutonium into the ocean and atmosphere. Pure and simple. Many many thousands of years of plutonium radioactivity and the other filth. there's nothing you can do about it. zillions of little dust sized particles blew a cool 1000 feet up from the blast and then further up and away. Every day Fuku water pours into the ocean. Fuku claims 70K gal a day. That's the same as 7 garden hoses putting out 7gpm 24/7. I don't believe 7 garden hoses can cool 3 melted cores or anything else related to Fuku. Do you?
Fukushima and all other nuclear facilities would do well to utilize an electric production method that can operate on the waste heat produced on site. Such a system would never have to be shut down and could be a supplement to a backup power source for the facility. Spent fuel is an energy source not being put to use. Just because the "spent fuel rods" won't efficiently operate a nuclear power plant doesn't mean they are useless. If there were a facility built to efficiently use the fuel rods in their "first" spent state, society could get some additional benefit for all the effort of producing the things in the first place. Note that it's said the rods can safely stored in the pool after being removed from the core of the power plant. Some years of storage in the pool are needed before the rods radiation level falls off and with it heat production. All that thermal energy is wasted.
+Clint Luckinbill This is a really clever idea. One issue could be that the thermal efficiency of system is defined by the difference between hot temperature and the cold temperature. Therefor you want your hot leg (coming from the reactor) to be as hot as possible, since you cant cool down the ambient. Waste heat isn't quiet hot enough to make it cost effective.
"tepco is ensuring that the utmost attention is being paid to the safety of the people and surrounding environments" lol that jokes hilarious, tell us another
I noticed a crud trail in the water as they were moving one of the assemblies. Is that common in BWR fuel movement? I've emptied casks from Brunswick into the pools at Harris. I always assumed the crud was coming off the fuel because it was hitting borated water for the first time. Is that incorrect?
It's mainly due to the heat the rods were exposed to due to the SFP becoming uncovered during the explosion of building 4, this type of fuel assembly should typically come out of the SFP clean but due to the damage to the ZIRCALLOY tubes a layer of what I can only presume is metal slag and concrete has built up on them
How could TEPCO have possibly carried out that type of lifting and removal operation (claimed at 2:25) 1200 times in the time (1033 days) since the initial damage? Is this video actual video of the inside of reactor 4 building?
TheBoostHeroMan Then that is quite the misleading reassurance, isn't it? As this is a unique situation that all experts involved with it have categorized as something totally different from any other fuel handling situation.
Tom Ford Its not different, its just people trying to cause hysteria. Fuel is Fuel, its not going to go critical since its so spent, its not going to somehow go above water and whatever else people have said would happen. This is just the Anti-nukes trying to scare the fuck out of people, and it worked.
Tom Ford the removal of these rods is the same as most other rod removal operations the difference being the context in which it is happening. These rods aren't damaged and the removal will now (after the repair of the surrounding area and the construction of the removal machinery) take place virtually as normal.
No where near the same scale of disaster..sorry. One had an open core exposure and one was well contained in the vessel and didn't explode releasing literally tons of extremely highly radioactive elements into the air that were detected 1000s of miles away in other countries. The reactor buildings exploded due to hydrogen buildup yes..but the reactors themselves did not explode. The two disasters are light years apart in magnitude and long term damage to health.
If you fell in that water would the radiation be strong enough to take effect imminently? or would it be weeks of agony?.... or even no real effect to start with then major cancer overload after years?
It's totally fake - the building was destroyed in the earthquake, and was never rebuilt. This is from another facility at Fukushima Daiini (sorry for bad spelling), a short distance away down the coast, and I believe this video can be found by referencing that. It's not Daiichi!
No, no, not me. Thank Indegruv. He needs it. Logic has nothing to do with it. 10 Foot Man tries as well; while TEPCO is not the company it should be, and it still has problems, it is performing the cleanup; the #4 pool has been cleared. What he believes is that they haven't, for no good reason I can discern. The technology isn't American, and I'm not a shill.
Jesus. Try this: www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/fuel-rods-are-removed-from-japans-damaged-fukushima-reactor.html?_r=0 ...or simply google it. The NRC released no such report.
Probably because nothing we have can tolerate that kind of radiation exposure without frying the circuits of every robot out that gets to close to the fuel. Try reading a bit and doing research..it's not hard. Google is your friend. gizmodo.com/excessive-radiation-inside-fukushima-fries-clean-up-rob-1792217866 so unless you're hiding some spectacular design I'd suggest shutting up and letting them deal with it.
I think they don't know yet. If the reactor vessel has no bottom, you can't fill it with water. And the fuel assemblies probably don't have tops any more: Nothing to grab.
3/15/2011 The Japanese government and TEPCO informs the IAEA that the spent fuel pool in Fukushima Diatchi Unit 4 is ON FIRE and releasing Radio Activity directly into the atmosphere. When the SFP gets to the point of ON FIRE , it's a done deal , game over. Tepco never removed a single fuel rod from unit 4 SFP.
@hell The reactors didn't explode...Chernobyl reactor exploded..if the reactors exploded that would have meant the cores were exposed as was Chernobyls core. The fuel melted and stayed inside the containment structures of the reactor vessels as designed. The explosions were from hydrogen build up in the building structures outside of the reactor its-self..do your research and learn to word properly. If 4 reactors exploded it's damn safe to say Japan would no longer exist as a livable country and neither would a good chunk of Korea or China depending on wind direction.
Actually Reactors are very hard to explode. Only emergency is meltdowns. Molten salt reactors are the safest in my opinion,but they require heavy maintenance.
@@doctorpanigrahi9975 Except RBMK reactors, they can explode very easily. PWR are the safest while being very efficient in my opinion, because there radioactive water never touches anything other then the pipes and core it means if a leak where to occur it would stay in the containment building.
+okami hirazawa The only reason would be this............ The Japanese want to keep aspects of the cast design a secret. How they make it and operate it, Kinda like if you paid 90 million dollars to develop something to use in your house and your buddy down the street sees it and builds his off your design saving himself 50million etc
I would guess they will handle it like TMI which was similar in damage in a lot of ways. At TMI they took a bit over a decade to slowly clean up the broken reactor and put the place into SAFSTOR. Then in 50-60 years, after most of the radiation from the tritium and stuff is gone, they will knock down and entomb the larger structures. All sorts of nasty stuff plated out on the inside of the building during the meltdown. That is stuff you want to keep locked up for as long as possible and not spread about by demolition charges and jackhammers. So they will wait.
+Lamp- Stand You're right. Everyone who has ever worked for the company should be fired and never be able to find a job anywhere ever again. Also all outside experts they've ever hired should be fired. Also all documents they ever wrote should be burned and their headquarters sacked by Mongols. Then - and only then - can their unforgivable crime of not anticipating every possible thing that could ever happen to any plant they operate ever be forgiven. And then only grudgingly. With lots of ridicule whenever possible.
And how do you know this, the fuel is being extracted from the SPF, the reactor was partially destroyed but the SPF remained mostly intact, unit 4 has a new cover over the building.
The ongoing triple core meltdown was just a fluke, these guys are serious about safety now! They used two wires when one wire could have done the job! Im super impressed. TEPCO has won back my trust!
On no that sounds dangerous and horrible? How much radiation is leaking from the meted cores? 100? 1000? Or no radiation at all because THE REACTOR VESSELS ARE VIRTUALLY INDESTRUCTIBLE? Yeah, there’s no danger outside of the reactor vessel, unless you want to go full ignorance and talk about radioactive water from cooling pools…
Have you seen the giant jellyfish clogging up bout propellers an shit ! The jellyfish are the only ones who benefited from that fuckup,was like nuclear fuck juice to them!
The reactor cores had their control rods removed greeting a massive fission reaction. This was done with the up most care to produce as much nuclear release as possible. Ever member of the team was trained in professional fuck up and carelessness, ever worker around the site died of radiation poisoning 100 times faster than the ones at Chernobyl. The reactors cores where also left in a full power state just for shit and giggles as the steam explosion would be rather awesome.
+("RNA0ROGER") Where are you getting this drivel? They melted due to lack of coolant not a loss of control, when the power went out the rods would have stayed where they were and would have needed the diesel generators for any hope of moving them in or out. The meltdown was caused by pumps losing their power.
Water is circulated through a water moderated reactor and so the water as a moderator can evaporate due to contact with hot metal from the fuel Assembly, causing pressure buildup as MORE water is input to prevent the rods from getting too hot due to lack of cooling and it is either A. Meltdown Or B. Steam explosion
Since the accident thet haven't mucked around, Tepco really have got a move on, I've been watching the live webcam feed for years (use it as test fottage at work) and the site looks almost like new again with rebuilt buildings etc, next time stick the diesel generators on the roof so water from tsunami cannot be taken in air intake and stall.
Adam Anderson, That I highly doubt, considering all the radiation that goes into the Pacific everyday. Chernobyl was localized for the most part, Fukashima radiation is from there to the West coast of America.
They blurred out the fuel to shield us from radiation.
So nice of them!
Only a X-ray radiation. What harm it'll be?
Keys
they blured because the tips are exposed ..the base is exposed
no... its because JAV
"d-dont touch my shafts Senpai..."
Mwahshsha
Based
Its ok, they censored just the tip
you ever seen Japanese porn? that's common lol and I'm only half joking.
Aaron Caraballo just the tip
But whyyyy?
Ryan L.
They censor it for a reason idiot.
JerkStop Gamer okok I just didn’t know why but I read through the comments.
Now I’m stuck on building my nuclear plant, I can’t figure out the blurry parts!
Watch Chernobyl, it should help. (?)
But than he needs to build an RBMK reactor.
@@sternpunkterdung1420 a basic reactor is actually fairly easy to make, getting the materials is the hard part.
The parts are blurred for security reasons, the base of the cask contains information about its shipping.
The story of Iran’s life…..
it's pixelated because the end caps have a proprietary design made out of Legos
www.GPcarAudio.com oh thx
I thought it was made in minecraft?
that's Japan.
I’m thinking it’s pubic hair. They always censor things like that in Japan, penetration too.
Tim Curci lol my thoughts exactly 😂
I love how everyone is commenting on the censorship.
My guess is that they don’t want people to know how to open these casks up if they get the chance.
Plausible
haha yeah that's it 👺
Nah they most likely use sole proprietary tech they don't wanna leak
Best way to pull a prank if you're a worker, scream "TSUNAMI"
Thumbs down for the porno on this video. CZcams even had to blur the pixel out the xxx images.
lol reactor fuel porn
Ozric Sturges Hot hot hot
i pay for quality products like this
:P
+John Smith Just an educational fact for you guys out there, these parts of the vessells are normally blurred for because their design is a company secret (I've heard it could be a security concern as well, but I believe each company asks that they not be recorded since they invest quite heavily in the designs).
Jess Vagnar No, you are wrong, its because these machine can double as sex bots and the images are considered to be vulgar xxx images. I have seen this happen on the news before when someone's pants falls down like on the TV show cops.
Why are images in this video pixelated? Are there people having sex all over this facility?
watch Dana durnfurd on CZcams. Fukushima all 6 reactors melted down!
To protect technical information. The designers of the reactor don't want their trade secrets to get out.
hahaha japanese are very experienced with pixelated videos :) :) :)
+Gioel Stradiotto And so are fans of Japanese videos. Don't like the blurring!
I'll figure it out as someone who knows a thing or two about nuclear power, I find it hard to take you serious when you can’t even spell ‘mystery’
The Japanese love to pixilate all the good stuff
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Must the Japanese blur any and all phallic/genitalia shaped objects?
lol
The parts that were blurred were blurred because they are key design features that are trademarks of the architect. They were blurred to prevent, not only corporate espionage, but also military espionage
Bobby Andrews
OH REEEEALLLLLLYY!!!
I was joking dude, come on.
Hey libtard SJW.
Alex xeon
Hey stupid bitch. Stalking my profile now?
The soothing music makes me confident that I can now open a can of slightly expired tuna. I'll use 12 grain bread as the white bread hits the eject button in my colon.
Jeezz, your comment makes me laugh so hard, i forgot those creepy evil green glowing water
White bread is like 99% sugar.
I wanted to watch the video but there seems to be a 3min 21sec advert before it starts...
Yeah, that morally-bankrupt IEEE bunch...
you can get rid of the advert
Alan Stutz The whole video is just an advert for Tepco, that is why I joked about a 3:21 advert.
use adblock lmao
Informative in a way, but VERY pro-TEPCO.
How nice Your exploded reactor looks from the inside!
Reactor 4 was fully unloaded when Tohoku earthquake occured.
@@dymytryruban4324 uhh spent fuel pools weren't
Anyone up for a swim? :D
95TurboSol I have a fear of holes and other items that look unnatural in the water so I think I'll pass lol..... The radiation doesn't seem so bad tho lol
The thing that would do it for me is the fear of a giant underwater fan hiding down there somewhere o:
dennyfrontier same. i have a huge fear of things underwater
cherry twitter
I can relate, I used to be terrified of pool drains as a kid, I always heard news stories of peoples hair getting sucked into them and they drowned, it gave me nightmares lol
It's called thalasiphobia fear of the sea or water itself
I want to see the video where he says "we have conducted this task only four other times in the past so we are not exactly that experienced."
Some say, we forgot to build the plant on stable solid ground away from the ocean, but they can never deny we totally mastered the periodical removal of nuclear fuel at the speed of 1 cm/s. TEPCO.
its japan ... its literally an island
How long (in time) the uranium stand until it needs to be replaced?
Looks like a nice place to go swimming!
Yeah
Wheres the diving board
It’s actually safe as long if you don’t touch the rods
Right! Get a condescending British Narrator and everything is ok.
hate it - BBC trained maybe?
lol
the upbeat elevator-music was what caught my attention first
czcams.com/video/x1bX3F7uTrg/video.html style always triumphs over substance.
There's German in that accent
Anybody else getting a really condescending vibe from the narrator?
"We are smart, and you are dumb. We know what we are doing, so don't you worry now."
It's like, they fucked up royally, both in terms of engineering and in their safety practices. Yet they still feel the need to give themselves a handjob over their handling of THEIR own mess.
😂
+acronus But... what if they *are* smart? And... what if you *are* dumb? I mean... can you build a nuclear power plant? Don't mean to defend them or to insult you or anything... just saying....
Lightspectre1 Can I build a nuclear reactor?
That's a foolish and simplistic question that completely misses the mark. There isn't a single human being on this planet that has all the necessary skill sets to design and build a nuclear reactor. A project that large would be broken down into sections or categories.
Point is, I'm not a nuclear engineer, but neither is the guy that wrote the script for this. I know I could have done a better job. Most people could.
Okay. Fine. Can you make any *components* used to build a reactor? Can you tell them how to do better?
All I'm saying is that it's pretty easy to say they fucked up. It's much harder to understand why they made the decisions that they did and make a concrete, cost effective suggestions for how to do better. One is constructive. The other is a waste of time. Am I correct?
Lightspectre1
By trade, I'm a millwright. I work on pumps, gear boxes, elevators, etc. I've worked on / installed large scale cooling equipment in production plants before. Tolerances, specifications, and material and equipment choices would be be far more strict in the design and construction of a nuclear facility. But the basic process would be the same.
As stated before, I'm not a nuclear engineer, and I also have hindsight on my side, but here's a few things that could have been done to make it safer.
1. Decommission or update the plant. It was built in 1967, and a lot of the systems used were out of date.
2. Not build it right on the coast. Especially in a country that's prone to earthquakes and tsunamis.
3. Not build build the plant right over an enormous underground aquifer.
4. The backup generators were the last line of defense in a catastrophe, and they were taken out easily. And their last ditch backup, batteries, were ineffective.
Fixing any one of those mentioned above could have diverted disaster.
And that is why they have no fucking right to act smug.
I'm done with this.
Where can I find the uncensored version of this video?!
The operation was completed as scheduled in December of 2014. The storage pool, which held all the spent fuel used by Unit 4 as well as its next fuel load (reactor 4 was empty at the time of the tsunami). That fuel is now stored in another new pool on the Fukushima plant grounds, well behind (and above) the plant.
+puncheex2 No it isn't. What "other pool" is there? THERE ISN'T ANY POOL, FOOL.
There was one pool for each reactor, and a late storage pool besides. Watch who thou callest fool...
@@puncheex2 The photo's show everything blown into smithereens. It spews death forever. (And Tons of Plutonium were blown into the sky in every direction. Japan is not safe. )
@@IExposeMormonism You have no idea about the words you so cavalierly throw around. Get off your emoting and try to convince me with science, if that is your goal.
@@puncheex2 See if you can find any evidence of their claims of success.. I trust nothing they say or show.. Fuku Japan is spewing plutonium into the ocean and atmosphere. Pure and simple. Many many thousands of years of plutonium radioactivity and the other filth. there's nothing you can do about it. zillions of little dust sized particles blew a cool 1000 feet up from the blast and then further up and away. Every day Fuku water pours into the ocean. Fuku claims 70K gal a day. That's the same as 7 garden hoses putting out 7gpm 24/7. I don't believe 7 garden hoses can cool 3 melted cores or anything else related to Fuku. Do you?
Fukushima and all other nuclear facilities would do well to utilize an electric production method that can operate on the waste heat produced on site. Such a system would never have to be shut down and could be a supplement to a backup power source for the facility.
Spent fuel is an energy source not being put to use. Just because the "spent fuel rods" won't efficiently operate a nuclear power plant doesn't mean they are useless. If there were a facility built to efficiently use the fuel rods in their "first" spent state, society could get some additional benefit for all the effort of producing the things in the first place. Note that it's said the rods can safely stored in the pool after being removed from the core of the power plant. Some years of storage in the pool are needed before the rods radiation level falls off and with it heat production. All that thermal energy is wasted.
+Clint Luckinbill This is a really clever idea. One issue could be that the thermal efficiency of system is defined by the difference between hot temperature and the cold temperature. Therefor you want your hot leg (coming from the reactor) to be as hot as possible, since you cant cool down the ambient. Waste heat isn't quiet hot enough to make it cost effective.
I've thought of this idea myself, thermonuclear power IS a thing, used mostly to power smaller spacecraft.
We are waiting for next gen reactors that will be able to simply USE the waste
@@fungdark8270 yes, but, for backup electricity, operate Sterling motors on the extrele warmth to produe the backup electric power.
How the hell did I get here?
I feel so comforted that tepco hired a a narrator with a British accent. that makes the 500 seiverts of plutonium much more bearable.
what do they do with all the contaminated water after?
wakaphwap Bottle it as Dasani
Ever wonder how mountain Dew is made???
boil it down and make oxyclean
Destill it probably.
They make Kool Aid
Do they want Godzilla? Cuz this is how you get Godzilla
Goh zee rah
"tepco is ensuring that the utmost attention is being paid to the safety of the people and surrounding environments" lol that jokes hilarious, tell us another
@The hive google three mile island, people do it all the time, they do it so they can use the water surrounding the plant to cool it, dumbass.
I noticed a crud trail in the water as they were moving one of the assemblies. Is that common in BWR fuel movement?
I've emptied casks from Brunswick into the pools at Harris. I always assumed the crud was coming off the fuel because it was hitting borated water for the first time. Is that incorrect?
It's mainly due to the heat the rods were exposed to due to the SFP becoming uncovered during the explosion of building 4, this type of fuel assembly should typically come out of the SFP clean but due to the damage to the ZIRCALLOY tubes a layer of what I can only presume is metal slag and concrete has built up on them
Why is the fuel core blotted out?
Pixeling parts of the video realy helps building trust, great job.
How could TEPCO have possibly carried out that type of lifting and removal operation (claimed at 2:25) 1200 times in the time (1033 days) since the initial damage? Is this video actual video of the inside of reactor 4 building?
They have removed fuel rods at different plants. *facepalm*
TheBoostHeroMan Then that is quite the misleading reassurance, isn't it? As this is a unique situation that all experts involved with it have categorized as something totally different from any other fuel handling situation.
Tom Ford Its not different, its just people trying to cause hysteria. Fuel is Fuel, its not going to go critical since its so spent, its not going to somehow go above water and whatever else people have said would happen. This is just the Anti-nukes trying to scare the fuck out of people, and it worked.
Phantasm americablog.com/2013/09/risky-repair-fukushima-spill-15000x-radiation-hiroshima-85x-chernobyl.html
Tom Ford
the removal of these rods is the same as most other rod removal operations the difference being the context in which it is happening. These rods aren't damaged and the removal will now (after the repair of the surrounding area and the construction of the removal machinery) take place virtually as normal.
"We have experience."
Fukushima disaster : *Hold my stability.*
Chernobyl: *Not bad, kid.*
No where near the same scale of disaster..sorry. One had an open core exposure and one was well contained in the vessel and didn't explode releasing literally tons of extremely highly radioactive elements into the air that were detected 1000s of miles away in other countries. The reactor buildings exploded due to hydrogen buildup yes..but the reactors themselves did not explode. The two disasters are light years apart in magnitude and long term damage to health.
If you fell in that water would the radiation be strong enough to take effect imminently? or would it be weeks of agony?.... or even no real effect to start with then major cancer overload after years?
It's totally fake - the building was destroyed in the earthquake, and was never rebuilt.
This is from another facility at Fukushima Daiini (sorry for bad spelling), a short distance away down the coast, and I believe this video can be found by referencing that.
It's not Daiichi!
Tepco shows itself no different than BP. The Nuclear industry risks being nearly as big a polluter as the oil & gas industry.
+screamengine hmmm. I find your opinion to be very difficult to back up scientifically.
What method are you using?
What if you dove in the pool? Would it give you a bigger hang down?
They took the effort to make a video of what they should do rather than put the effort into really making it !! Well done !
***** No, they actually did it; it was completed on schedule. Also well done.
Bug off. I don't need your praise.
+puncheex2 Thank you for using logic and sense to comment on youtube.
No, no, not me. Thank Indegruv. He needs it. Logic has nothing to do with it. 10 Foot Man tries as well; while TEPCO is not the company it should be, and it still has problems, it is performing the cleanup; the #4 pool has been cleared. What he believes is that they haven't, for no good reason I can discern. The technology isn't American, and I'm not a shill.
Jesus. Try this: www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/fuel-rods-are-removed-from-japans-damaged-fukushima-reactor.html?_r=0
...or simply google it. The NRC released no such report.
I hope they dont make another mistake while carrying out this operation.
Fuel handling machine and overhead crane are the same. Also the tip of the cylinder has been blurred to make it safe for work viewing.
They have also good experience with coolant pumps in basements.
Why are some parts of the video blurred/pixelated?
Because some people from the United States are offended by the Naked fuel containers
Ohh GEE.... WONDER WHY THEY DIDNT EXPLAIN HOW THEY WILL REMOVE THE MELTED FUEL? HMMM
Probably because nothing we have can tolerate that kind of radiation exposure without frying the circuits of every robot out that gets to close to the fuel. Try reading a bit and doing research..it's not hard. Google is your friend. gizmodo.com/excessive-radiation-inside-fukushima-fries-clean-up-rob-1792217866 so unless you're hiding some spectacular design I'd suggest shutting up and letting them deal with it.
I think they don't know yet. If the reactor vessel has no bottom, you can't fill it with water. And the fuel assemblies probably don't have tops any more: Nothing to grab.
why are some parts blurred out?
+Rick A Nuke porn
+Rick A because it's LIES
+Rick A Trade secrets. Same reason software companies take measure to make sure people don't copy it.
Malmo is at S. Sweden
Copenhagen is in Canada. What is AP .1-88 ? A courier service?
Page 56
Why do you blur out the Cask's?
3/15/2011 The Japanese government and TEPCO informs the IAEA that the spent fuel pool in Fukushima Diatchi Unit 4 is ON FIRE and releasing Radio Activity directly into the atmosphere.
When the SFP gets to the point of ON FIRE , it's a done deal , game over. Tepco never removed a single fuel rod from unit 4 SFP.
Welp, I'm sold! Sounds like that company knows what it's doing, and it's doing it in the right and safe way. Nothing can go wrong here!
...
/sarcasm
EVA_Unit_4A stop
@hell The reactors didn't explode...Chernobyl reactor exploded..if the reactors exploded that would have meant the cores were exposed as was Chernobyls core. The fuel melted and stayed inside the containment structures of the reactor vessels as designed. The explosions were from hydrogen build up in the building structures outside of the reactor its-self..do your research and learn to word properly. If 4 reactors exploded it's damn safe to say Japan would no longer exist as a livable country and neither would a good chunk of Korea or China depending on wind direction.
Actually Reactors are very hard to explode. Only emergency is meltdowns. Molten salt reactors are the safest in my opinion,but they require heavy maintenance.
@@doctorpanigrahi9975 Except RBMK reactors, they can explode very easily. PWR are the safest while being very efficient in my opinion, because there radioactive water never touches anything other then the pipes and core it means if a leak where to occur it would stay in the containment building.
So if it moves to fast the fuel explodes or something? Or it's just to keep the container from swinging/falling
nah, nuclear fuel cannot explode like that.
they are just careful so that it doesnt drop and make a mess.
then it would be dangerous.
out of container
@@spatrk6634 I see
love the way they say utmost safety like a year later one of the reactors explode
Uh, no, no it didn’t
What? You might be confused there bud.
That is weird Chernobyls explosion was in unit 4
Unit 4 building you can see from the third floor to the roof there was nothing left it blew up this is all Bs
01:50 why it was censored ?
+okami hirazawa The only reason would be this............ The Japanese want to keep aspects of the cast design a secret. How they make it and operate it, Kinda like if you paid 90 million dollars to develop something to use in your house and your buddy down the street sees it and builds his off your design saving himself 50million etc
+okami hirazawa like uncensored JAV!
+Manh Ngo wx
Probably some fucking fucked up mechanical hentai
Hahaha xD
I have no clue what is going on or why?
How long will it take to remove the Fukushima Diichi plant
I would guess they will handle it like TMI which was similar in damage in a lot of ways.
At TMI they took a bit over a decade to slowly clean up the broken reactor and put the place into SAFSTOR. Then in 50-60 years, after most of the radiation from the tritium and stuff is gone, they will knock down and entomb the larger structures. All sorts of nasty stuff plated out on the inside of the building during the meltdown. That is stuff you want to keep locked up for as long as possible and not spread about by demolition charges and jackhammers. So they will wait.
Whats up with all the pixelation censoring? This was an American designed power plant!
thats probably why xD
It's got technical information on them, possibly sensitive or maybe just a patented blueprint of the design.
its not just america CZcams reaches. probably protecting some kind of writing. measurements, max load maybe even company name.
I DON'T NO YOU NO!!!
B.A.E !!!!!!!!!!
Because then you would see it isn't reactor #4.
How can TEPCO assert anything, anymore, with any credibility? (Regardless of how sedately stated.)
+Lamp- Stand You're right. Everyone who has ever worked for the company should be fired and never be able to find a job anywhere ever again. Also all outside experts they've ever hired should be fired. Also all documents they ever wrote should be burned and their headquarters sacked by Mongols.
Then - and only then - can their unforgivable crime of not anticipating every possible thing that could ever happen to any plant they operate ever be forgiven. And then only grudgingly. With lots of ridicule whenever possible.
Wow. And, . . no comment.
What does the sensorship hides exactly???
Transport information
Why is the cask blurred?
whats with the blur ??
Some company secret. Obviously
Make sure you hire plenty of homeless people to clean up your messes and then dismiss them without pay, its the honorable thing to do isn't it?
How are you censoring the spent fuel pool Botton when it just a spent fuel pool
Hitachi can build fuel rod removal machines, but can't make a TV worth a damn.
So... the casks have pubic hair?!
Y is it blured out?
In retrospect probably should’ve put the backup generators at higher ground with grate flooring.
Why isn't this in at least 720p?
radiation
MegaHolymoly Your one word reply made me chuckle 😅
japanese sensor, genitals, and aparantly the genital part of a cylindrical device aswell
2:05 why is it censored this is not Japanese Porn?
*****
Ohhh, I saw on 4 Unit Cernobil some informations...
this narrator has that voice they use when they are telling you complete bullshit :P
Reactor number 4, i can’t stop laughing 😂. This is not reactor 4.
And how do you know this, the fuel is being extracted from the SPF, the reactor was partially destroyed but the SPF remained mostly intact, unit 4 has a new cover over the building.
Now we can sleep at night cause Tepco has made this fantasy video about a building that doesn't even exist anymore. We need more pixelativity.
only 3 out of the 6 reactors melted down
this is Japanese Hollywood.
why is the water so green? algee, boron or some other chemical, or coloring to notice a leak?
Absolute genius idea to put the gensets in the basement in such a tsunami prone area Genius. Common pool = Pacific Ocean.
Damn it, the Japanese blur or digitize out everything. First porn, now this?
"This video includes pixelized parts mainly in view of technical knowledge."
Because, as we all know, knowledge can only be used for evil.
Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to shit like this
What is the point for nuclear power? War weapons?
electricity
Winner: Most Unnecessary Pixelation, 2013. 🏆
The ongoing triple core meltdown was just a fluke, these guys are serious about safety now! They used two wires when one wire could have done the job! Im super impressed. TEPCO has won back my trust!
On no that sounds dangerous and horrible?
How much radiation is leaking from the meted cores?
100?
1000?
Or no radiation at all because THE REACTOR VESSELS ARE VIRTUALLY INDESTRUCTIBLE?
Yeah, there’s no danger outside of the reactor vessel, unless you want to go full ignorance and talk about radioactive water from cooling pools…
Sarcasm...? I hope...fuck these guys they contaminated the oceans like never before..fuck em
Have you seen the giant jellyfish clogging up bout propellers an shit ! The jellyfish are the only ones who benefited from that fuckup,was like nuclear fuck juice to them!
You can clearly see they use 16 wires, not two.
that is NOT inside Fukushima no.4.
+cicatrixta How do you know this? Did you go there on a school trip? Or maybe during an astral projection?
its number 4 look pictures they build that building.
I havent looked but more likely a MOCK exercise, yes
The #4 building was repaired to prevent the weather from spreading any radioactivity.
cicatrixta thats it
Why is it all the time the reactor 4????
So... you are saying i need a pool for my homemade thorium reactor.
My diy approach to thorium purification is going well, barely any leaks..
Eqvaliser careful or you'll have Men In Black show up at your house
Carlos Vera They are like religion and santa claus, they only come if you believe in them. :p
Lol
Greenscreen Heaven
Spiffing show old chap
question why the upper and lower part of the cask are blurred ? such casks arent new nor dangerous to show in full picture to the public
Technical info
@@voidjavelin23
dont think there was any technical infos there thats normal casks same as we use in germany to transport used fuel assemblys
@@incrediblemichael then it must be a transport info or even a trademark of the architec
Must be tricky handling a pixilated cask.
Liars!!!They are full go it GE is the company that is hidden in the video BTW
They are actually Holtec HI-STORM casks that they have blurred out, due to the proprietary hoist mounting design and robotically welded lid.
+wiretap25 they are also working on new technologies for them.
The reactor cores had their control rods removed greeting a massive fission reaction. This was done with the up most care to produce as much nuclear release as possible. Ever member of the team was trained in professional fuck up and carelessness, ever worker around the site died of radiation poisoning 100 times faster than the ones at Chernobyl. The reactors cores where also left in a full power state just for shit and giggles as the steam explosion would be rather awesome.
+("RNA0ROGER") Where are you getting this drivel? They melted due to lack of coolant not a loss of control, when the power went out the rods would have stayed where they were and would have needed the diesel generators for any hope of moving them in or out. The meltdown was caused by pumps losing their power.
Nobody died from Fukushima
If the heat source being "the main in use fuel rods" were removed how did a steam explosion happen??? Im not a nuclear engineer, but.....
Nuclear power is basically steam power...Us monkeys upgraded are coal 🥸
Water is circulated through a water moderated reactor and so the water as a moderator can evaporate due to contact with hot metal from the fuel Assembly, causing pressure buildup as MORE water is input to prevent the rods from getting too hot due to lack of cooling and it is either A. Meltdown
Or
B. Steam explosion
Since the accident thet haven't mucked around, Tepco really have got a move on, I've been watching the live webcam feed for years (use it as test fottage at work) and the site looks almost like new again with rebuilt buildings etc, next time stick the diesel generators on the roof so water from tsunami cannot be taken in air intake and stall.
When i see the blur I knew the comment section is gon be gold
Does the cask have pubic hair growing on it or something?
You must be from rival company.
Well done tepco,I think you’ve done a great job wrecking this planet
That’s funny, this didn’t do anything
Lol 🤣
Thousands of times less than fossil fuel industry
What would happen if you fell in? I'm really curious.
Nothing much...
I wonder if this will be remembered as much as Chernobyl?
Adam Anderson, That I highly doubt, considering all the radiation that goes into the Pacific everyday. Chernobyl was localized for the most part, Fukashima radiation is from there to the West coast of America.
I wasn't ready for propaganda garbage when clicking this recommended video.
Tepco makes sure the safety bla bla bla todays headlines " Fukushima workers sue Tepco over unpaid hazard pay "
why is there pixelated parts in this video?
the reason I'm here is because I'm trying to find out what they do to abandoned power plants that are still functional
thank you TEPCO for placing all of humanity in danger of extinction, humanity is really grateful.