Your teaching is so valuable. I appreciate hearing the false teachers are teaching and then the contrast with what scripture says. Very clarifying and just amplifies the amazingness of the gospel.
Another great video. You clearly showed the ignorance in the argument that it was the priesthood only that had been changed and new and not the covenant. Clearly the new covenant/grace replaced the old covenant/law. God had promised to give us what we are unable to accomplish. We are saved by grace alone. Obedience to our Lord does follow too, but as a fruit. We aren't saying there is no sin.
Andrew admits the word "covenant" is not in the original Greek, and agrees that the sum of the chapter is about a new high priest not a replaced Israel or replaced Covenant.
How does it make any logical sense that God was so offended at sin that he separated from his creation and had to sacrifice his own son in order to reconcile his creation to himself but now sin is no big deal? Remember that the biblical definition of sin is the transgression of the law. One of those laws is the sabbath.
@@strykerdawn1 i completely agree. The new covenant did away with the types and shadows of the sacrificial system so he can write his laws on our tablets of flesh
@@Eric-fq5wxbecause JESUS’ complete perfect obedience to go on The Tree was the reversal of Adam’s Sin eating the forbidden fruit. So Jesus was the end of the law ~ HE paid it in Full. Through His Resurrection He begins The New Covenant ✝️🩸🕊️ HE IS THE ETERNAL HIGH PRIEST ~ John 6 v 29 ~ Faith. Only Believe 🙏🏻🙏🏿
@@P.H.888 i agree with much of what you said but what law was Jesus the end of? Is he the end of the 10 commandments making adultery, murder, theft and having other gods before him is now ok? Or is he the end of a different law? I believe he is the end of the penalty law making him our high priest as Hebrews says and as the high priest did under the old covenant offering sacrifices for sins. But pay close attention to what Hebrews 10 says if you continue sinning or transgressing the law. Heb10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? All laws are written in pairs. A law prescribing a behavior and a separate law prescribing the penalty for breaking the behavior. Example. A speed limit. We are "under" the speed limit when we get a driver's license and agree to be under the traffic laws. We are not "under" the penalty until we break the speed limit. We are all guilty of breaking Gods law so we are all under Gods penalty. When we are found guilty before a judge he will give us a fine to pay (animal sacrifice), We then go to the bailiff and pay the fine. I have just "fulfilled" the law by paying the penalty just as Christ "fulfilled" The law by dying on the cross. Question, does me paying the penalty for speeding give me the right to speed? Does it do away with the speed limit? What will the judge do if I'm before him the next week having transgressed the same law? He will likely increase the fine until my license is suspended. Just as God says he will do in Hebrews 10. You cannot get away from the law of God. It is eternal.
I can see by the previous comments you are really making the devil mad. I just found out about your channel from watching you and your wife on Cultish. My ministry is aimed at another legalistic group but I can definitely learn new aspects of dealing with them from you folks. Blessings 🕊️
Hi! Im new to your channel! I have Heggs commentary on Hebrews. How come you didnt show the full paragraph on Heggs commentary on pg 348? You cut it off from your video right where it gets interesting.😢 He explains a littler further in pg 349 his thoughts on the verse.
This video isn’t about Hegg. I was making a simple point about verse 13. Hegg makes many errors in the commentary, but that is a topic for another time.
Laws are always written in pairs. There is a law prescribing what to do and a completely separate law as the penalty for breaking the first. If you read Hebrews in context it is clear that the penalties as sacrifices are done away with but Hebrews 10 is clear that if we continue sinning after having a knowledge of the truth there remains no more sacrifice for sins but a fearful looking for of judgment. 1 john is clear that sin is the transgression of the law. The law is eternal but the penalty was paid once and for all
I stopped about halfway through because there are missing nouns. You say covenant, and he says priesthood (because they ministered). Which one of these was referred to previously? You guessed it. Ministry. This is why the guy carried over ideas from the previous chapter. When Hebrews was written, did it have chapters and verses? You will go with the italics because that suits your argument. I love how you accused him of listening to other men instead of studying for himself.
The Hebrew root & 119 fellers are a toxic cult. I can see this guy's urgency to point things out that some new Christians may come across & shipwreck their faith. You are right, however, that way too many make countless videos on doctrinal issues and if we were still in the dark ages there would be thousands burned at the stake by each other. Satan does very well on social media in hopes a believer would not utilize the Word & the Holy Spirit to learn. I do believe the Hebrew roots & the 119 gang are one of many cults & more emphasis put on identifying that fact
Do you ever make your own content ? Or just skirt off the coat tails others’ videos ? That is all I ever see on your channel- reviewing others’ hard work. Not ever really doing much of your own
You haven’t looked very hard. Check the playlists. And I make zero apologies for refuting false theology. You’re here making a comment on someone else’s channel. Also not wrong on my view. But suspect based on your argument.
@@TheBeginningOfWisdom I’ve looked hard enough to know in the last year that’s been the majority of your work. I would suggest putting more effort into teaching what YOU think is biblical, instead of focusing on criticizing others. It’s off putting to new followers is all I’m saying. If you’re remotely a decent teacher than that’s what you should be doing - teaching and not focused on refuting. Let God handle the “false teachers”
Your teaching is so valuable. I appreciate hearing the false teachers are teaching and then the contrast with what scripture says. Very clarifying and just amplifies the amazingness of the gospel.
I didn't get to enjoy this as much as I would like. Watching again. Thanks for all you do
Great video once again, David. Keep up the good work. You are wise as a serpent but gentle as a dove.
Can’t wait.
Jeremiah promised that the law would be written on your heart
Jeremiah said the new covenant is with the house of Israel and Judah, what law do they know? The law of Moses 🙂
@@johnlawson6851Jeremiah 31 v 32 Not Like Sinai‼️
Isaiah 49 v 6 The Gentile Nations!
John 3 v 16/7.
John 6 v 29.
Another great video. You clearly showed the ignorance in the argument that it was the priesthood only that had been changed and new and not the covenant.
Clearly the new covenant/grace replaced the old covenant/law.
God had promised to give us what we are unable to accomplish.
We are saved by grace alone.
Obedience to our Lord does follow too, but as a fruit. We aren't saying there is no sin.
Andrew admits the word "covenant" is not in the original Greek, and agrees that the sum of the chapter is about a new high priest not a replaced Israel or replaced Covenant.
@@johnlawson6851you seem to have missed those discussions and points quite poignantly smh
SmAsH tHe LiKe bUtToN 😂
New covenant! Love it
I find it interesting that Mr. Lawson's logo is a picture of a wolf. Freudian slip?
The thought crossed my mind. 😅
Isa 11:6
"The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb"
@@johnlawson6851 Then you should put Isa.11:6 into your logo, or maybe a picture of a wolf and lamb together. I would have recognized that.
@@markfrench2980
That's a good idea!
How does it make any logical sense that God was so offended at sin that he separated from his creation and had to sacrifice his own son in order to reconcile his creation to himself but now sin is no big deal? Remember that the biblical definition of sin is the transgression of the law. One of those laws is the sabbath.
God planned both the old covenant and the new covenant before creation. Both were his plan all along.
@@strykerdawn1 i completely agree. The new covenant did away with the types and shadows of the sacrificial system so he can write his laws on our tablets of flesh
@@Eric-fq5wxbecause JESUS’ complete perfect obedience to go on The Tree was the reversal of Adam’s Sin eating the forbidden fruit.
So Jesus was the end of the law ~ HE paid it in Full.
Through His Resurrection He begins The New Covenant ✝️🩸🕊️ HE IS THE ETERNAL HIGH PRIEST ~
John 6 v 29 ~ Faith. Only Believe 🙏🏻🙏🏿
@@P.H.888 i agree with much of what you said but what law was Jesus the end of? Is he the end of the 10 commandments making adultery, murder, theft and having other gods before him is now ok? Or is he the end of a different law? I believe he is the end of the penalty law making him our high priest as Hebrews says and as the high priest did under the old covenant offering sacrifices for sins. But pay close attention to what Hebrews 10 says if you continue sinning or transgressing the law. Heb10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
All laws are written in pairs. A law prescribing a behavior and a separate law prescribing the penalty for breaking the behavior. Example. A speed limit. We are "under" the speed limit when we get a driver's license and agree to be under the traffic laws. We are not "under" the penalty until we break the speed limit. We are all guilty of breaking Gods law so we are all under Gods penalty. When we are found guilty before a judge he will give us a fine to pay (animal sacrifice), We then go to the bailiff and pay the fine. I have just "fulfilled" the law by paying the penalty just as Christ "fulfilled" The law by dying on the cross. Question, does me paying the penalty for speeding give me the right to speed? Does it do away with the speed limit? What will the judge do if I'm before him the next week having transgressed the same law? He will likely increase the fine until my license is suspended. Just as God says he will do in Hebrews 10. You cannot get away from the law of God. It is eternal.
I can see by the previous comments you are really making the devil mad. I just found out about your channel from watching you and your wife on Cultish. My ministry is aimed at another legalistic group but I can definitely learn new aspects of dealing with them from you folks.
Blessings 🕊️
Yaaaaay!
Hi! Im new to your channel! I have Heggs commentary on Hebrews. How come you didnt show the full paragraph on Heggs commentary on pg 348? You cut it off from your video right where it gets interesting.😢 He explains a littler further in pg 349 his thoughts on the verse.
This video isn’t about Hegg. I was making a simple point about verse 13. Hegg makes many errors in the commentary, but that is a topic for another time.
Laws are always written in pairs. There is a law prescribing what to do and a completely separate law as the penalty for breaking the first. If you read Hebrews in context it is clear that the penalties as sacrifices are done away with but Hebrews 10 is clear that if we continue sinning after having a knowledge of the truth there remains no more sacrifice for sins but a fearful looking for of judgment. 1 john is clear that sin is the transgression of the law. The law is eternal but the penalty was paid once and for all
Are the animal sacrifices eternal laws?
@@strykerdawn1 No
Do Not eat fruit from the tree of good and evil.
??
@@P.H.888 do not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil is the law, death is the penalty.
I stopped about halfway through because there are missing nouns. You say covenant, and he says priesthood (because they ministered). Which one of these was referred to previously? You guessed it. Ministry. This is why the guy carried over ideas from the previous chapter. When Hebrews was written, did it have chapters and verses? You will go with the italics because that suits your argument. I love how you accused him of listening to other men instead of studying for himself.
The Hebrew root & 119 fellers are a toxic cult. I can see this guy's urgency to point things out that some new Christians may come across & shipwreck their faith. You are right, however, that way too many make countless videos on doctrinal issues and if we were still in the dark ages there would be thousands burned at the stake by each other. Satan does very well on social media in hopes a believer would not utilize the Word & the Holy Spirit to learn. I do believe the Hebrew roots & the 119 gang are one of many cults & more emphasis put on identifying that fact
I told you years ago your channel would become insignificant.
Religious pride.
Jeremiah 31 v 31
The New Covenant
32 NOT LIKE SINAI ‼️
33 INDWELLING
34 NO SIN‼️
John 3 v 16/7
John 6 v 29
Hebrews 8 v 9-13.
Do you ever make your own content ? Or just skirt off the coat tails others’ videos ? That is all I ever see on your channel- reviewing others’ hard work. Not ever really doing much of your own
You haven’t looked very hard. Check the playlists. And I make zero apologies for refuting false theology. You’re here making a comment on someone else’s channel. Also not wrong on my view. But suspect based on your argument.
@@TheBeginningOfWisdom I’ve looked hard enough to know in the last year that’s been the majority of your work. I would suggest putting more effort into teaching what YOU think is biblical, instead of focusing on criticizing others. It’s off putting to new followers is all I’m saying. If you’re remotely a decent teacher than that’s what you should be doing - teaching and not focused on refuting. Let God handle the “false teachers”
@@cclouse28you don’t practice what you preach. 😂