1:56 to anyone interested the sign is in german and it says: i didn't wanted my children to fight 2:25 i am a coward i didn't want to fight for the german folks
5:03 Kid: dad, how did grandpa die in the war Dad: u see son, there was an American who threw an empty gun at your grandfather's skull at terminal velocity
@@bicycleman7474 never but think about the rate of fire of the mg42 so 25 rounds a second and every 5th is a tracer so you only saw like this one tracer round but nearly at the same time around 5 or 6 rounds passed throu the leg so no the question is: do 5 bullets take of a leg?
I agree but honestly the scene just looked too goofy for me ^^" not to mention, if you were burning like that, I think 99% of people wouldn't have the will power to think of move your hand to your pistol hostel, pick up the gun, then scream one last time, then pull the trigger.
Yeah, it's just there for dramatic effect, I understand and of course they would scream if they can, no doubt about that. I just wanted to say I didn't get the same effect as probably as you or he did sinc e it just looked goofy to me personally.
@@Warhero1171 I thought they carried them for self defense ^^" plus I actually looked it up and a lot of late war variants of sherman tanks never burned like that since the ammo was stored in water :,D
That's one of the most stupid quotes that can be said. It usually means the one saying it does not studied history and only learned through movies like this one (that was anything but accurate, it was like seeing a Vietnam bad flick with nazis on it) and/or Call of Duty. Most important historical moments has been decided in long, very long and very boring to read conferences about politics or religion (sometimes both). It has laws, treaties, economy, art, philosophy, teachings and studies. The rise of the modern economy, the mercantile treaties over seas of Holand, Barcelona and Venice, commerce leagues like Hansa... Revolts, revolutions and wars are not the main focus on history. At all. History is not violent. it just is.
For those of you wondering, the sign at 1:52 reads "I did not want my children to fight", and the one at 2:24 reads "I am a coward who did not want to fight for the German people"
1:31 all i see are dead bodies How do you know there dead are you a doctor Well some are in pieces and have their guts hanging id say there still alive
You couldnt go anywhere in the comment section of this movie without a huge shitfit going on. Theres mild annoyance with some of the inaccuracies, and then there was category 5 autism storms about the tiger tank leaving its position or the germans taken turns shooting the good guys rather than in unison.
More like it's famous for triggering alt-right neo-Nazis who don't seem to realize that the krauts were really not that impressive. They got their asses kicked on every front. And their overrated tanks got decimated by much cheaper Russian tanks. The idea that the Nazis and the Germans as a whole were super advanced and well trained compared to everyone else is utterly false. They simply were stupid enough to waste money on technology that failed to have any strategic effect, and wasted their time building slow, massive tanks that ran out of fuel and broke down. The only reason they were initially good is because they had spent years preparing for war while no one else had. But when everyone else got their shit together, the krauts revived an ass kicking. They failed miserably during the Battle of Britain despite having better planes. Nazi Germany is the epitome of stupidity.
In this little microcosm we managed to start another WWII argument in another fury video. but yea doesnt matter if its a parody or a historical video, you'll always get someone triggered in these kind of vids
@@ForchinBrewer I agree with you and I really would like to put all the cast in a actual and accurate reenactment just to show them how it is really done
3:02 that part will always give me chills I can’t imagine being in a Sherman tank and being shot at by a tiger in real life the tiger would have destroyed all the Sherman’s but in this movie it had stormtrooper aim
And it moved out of a concealed position, in fact it should have shot fury first because of it being the lead vehicle as well as having the bigger gun.
@@dougabbott8261 not to mention the gun had no stabilisation, wouldn't have hit shit. Fury would've clapped the Tiger's cheeks in 1-2 shells in real life
That was the point in the film where i was unable to give its missteps a pass. It was just so absurd how a group of elite German troops just kept trying to push a tank from the front when they had all terrain flexibility to flank it from both sides after its initial surprise volley went off. Its one thing is this was some crazy over the top action film that didn't take itself seriously, but considering how the film seemed to be constantly putting in a effort to be more serious and gritty that whole part just felt out of place and ridiculous. Honestly scenes like that in generally serious films annoy me because undermined the point of a last stand if your enemies are so dumb its a miracle they aren't tripping over their own feet every other step how can you really feel like odds are stacked?
There was actual case in real wartime like this. Audie Murphy killed about 300 German soldiers with M2 Browning on his M10 Wolverine. In Korean War, Ernest Couma defeated 500 north korean soldiers by killing half of them for 9 hours.
I'm loving that your statistics are proving that movies based on real life have expediently more kills than horror movies...even if you were not out to prove that
Actual Wars had much higher kill counts so really it's not a surprise at all. And this war film was made specifically to disabuse you of the notion of War being glorious.
its stupid that ppl watch these movies with "based on history" and they believe 99% that this shit happened. good job hollywood u make history to fit ur narrative and ppl believe it. one more reason to not bellieve the interneyt and media but what can u dp when the generation anfter generation are raised by the internet via phones what parents buy to their kids when they are fking 9 years old
For all those ripping the historical accuracy of the Tiger combat and then the SS batt battle you all need to remember this about the movie. Fury is set in April of 45 near the end of the War in Europe. By this time the Russians had surrounded Berlin and most German units had next to ZERO ammo left left alone getting resupplied. Single tank on tank combat did occur in Europe near the end of the war in the area where the US Army was attacking normally it was units of German armor that had been cut off when they were bypassed and trying to get back to their lines. Also the majority of the Panzerfausts where ordered to Berlin in an effort to hold the city at all costs. Along with all armor anti tank guns most of the regular army units and pretty much anything that they could scrape up went to Berlin before it was surrounded. Now as to how one tank could hold off a Battalion of SS troops. The MG42 can only pen 1 inch of armor the M4E8 has over 40MM or over 1 inch at its weakest point on the hull. So shooting machine guns at it would do next to nothing to really hurt the tank the Germans did not really have a good Anti armor gun that was issued to the infantry like the M2 we did. Next the blown shot in the city beyond a 45 degree angle a tank stands any tank stands a good chance of bouncing the shot. Why do you think we do not use HEAT rounds in our M1A2 tanks instead going for APDS are not angle driven and are harder to ricochet. Lastly while the Fury tank and crew itself was fiction all 7 of the battles where based off of REAL WW2 interactions that happened with M4 Sherman tanks and German troops and or tanks during the War. That's right everything here was based off of official US War Debriefings taken from the troops that fought the battles.
Sure. Then Hollywood comes along takes all of what you've just said, line it up near a ditch and shoots it in the head. Then goes along and makes this movie.
Good to know, I should also recommend going to see the Rambo(2008) movie or at least the Carnage Count . That movie is quite bloody and well, just watch it.
Probably the loader on account of it's slow fire rate shortly after and the fact that only three crew members were seen running from the tank. Just my theory
@@sdslofi1107 I think it was the driver due to it pretty much halting all together, but the gunner,commander, and at least either the driver or loader survived with the latter being killed by the piercing shot/fire
@@thecrtf4953 i know this movie is pretty inaccurate but a sherman shell would never penetrate the turret face of a tiger you have a better chance penetrating the upper glacias
damiansback i think Fury was an E8 model, these Sherman’s where produced to face the German Cats like Tigers and Panthers. While it is impossible for the gun to penetrate the turret at around 500meters, it ain’t on around 50-100 meters
In April 1945, the Allies are making their final push in the European theater. A battle-hardened Army sergeant named Collier (Pitt), leading a Sherman tank and a five-man crew, undertakes a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Hopelessly outnumbered, outgunned, and saddled with an inexperienced soldier Norman (Lerman) in their midst, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds as they move to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
@@crkt9971 And it's obvious you didn't understand what I meant. Tracers weren't used EVERY SINGLE ROUND...that's where the star wars joke comes in since every damn round fired is a tracer. Henceforth this is a joke pointing out the unrealistic use of tracers in this movie.
Also not to be annoying but at 3:02 The Tiger Most likely would of Aimed at fury For 2 Reasons: 1 It had a 76 mm high velocity cannon, and 2. it was german strategy to target the 1st tank in a column and then the last tank. This is a Good movie though and I do like it
The director actually mentions this but didn't have it happen because that would mean that the fury would be destroyed and the film would end before it actually does.
Ikr they were taught in training by destroying the leading vehicle stopping the convoy and then destroy the rear vehicle so the enemy can't move back and then destroy what's left. But I guess they wanted to keep the movie going
Those are actually tracer rounds. There meant to make it easier for the shooter to know where there shots of going. I believe every fourth bullet is a tracer, and it just looks like they all are because they are firing so fast.
The movie that set the internet forums ablaze from every WWII tiger tank enthusiest out there. Good film, but some action scenes I do agree come off contrived
I agree especially the tiger v Sherman scene the easy eight had a HV 76mm and the tiger should not have advance (sorry I am really a nerd when it comes to tank tactics)
Yea I remember how much people lost their shit about it, even videos dedicated to it. It was pretty entertaining to watch the arguments about scenes like that
Yeah they were but if you read the journals of the Germans and British on vehicular combat this is about as accurate as we can get. Also the anti tank guns were very inaccurate with them having to fire at least 10 shots before landing a perfect shot. (This is for moving targets)
I was gonna say how realistic it was that the guy on fire shot himself and how cool that was Bc it never happens, but then I realized wouldn’t the gun either have like idk exploded from the heat, or at the very least been too hot to hold and operate
the unrealitisc thing is that they gave in to the "tommy cooker" myth.... either the tank exploded instantly and killed everyone, or it burnt and they had more time to escape, possibly with burn wounds, but not like shown.... the tiger tank was much worse when it came to escape routes from fire
Times the movie would have ended: 1:16 2:02 (there goes our A-Lister) 2:27 3:02 (don't bother shooting the lead of the column) 4:20 (Waffen-SS doesn't have a single anti-tank weapon) None of this really matters, it's just a film
WAIT DO I HAVE TO DO EVERYONES THINKING? The overuse of TRACER BULLETS made this a much MORE VISUALLY EXCITING movie. It can be easy explained that the supply of regular ammunition was low (due to bad supply lines) so that both sides had to overuse their tracers. PLUS YOU GOT AN AUDIENCE THAT GREW UP WITH STAR WARS AS THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES. Big difference here is that both enemies (Allies and Axis) can shoot without missing unlike STAR WARS. STAR WARS is basically a KIDDIE MOVIE masquerading as an ADULT MOVIE.
For those of you saying bullets look like star wars blasts: 1 in 5 rounds shot out of the M1919's are tracers that light up to see where you are shooting
German soldiers : oh yeah. lets never stop running infront of the tank and never ambush it from the side and back. ohhhh and dont forget to fire at it with mg´s and k98. it was such a good ww2 movie. the last part made it one of the worst
As I watched this I was reminded of those old Sgt Rock comics from the 60s. Ultraviolent! While certainly not technically precise, this movie captures the "effect" of war and close combat. Valor bordering on psychopathy; laser beam focus in the midst of utter confusion... and of course, the bonding of men facing and overcoming the fear of death together. Superb!
Regardless of the people bitching about the starwars looking bullets and shells, and the ones bitching about it being crap, i actually have this movie in my top 5 favorite wwii movies -_-
I actually thought it's the other way around. This movie shows the war in a dark violent tone, where it's often a killed or be killed situation without any room for thought. It shows that the war is fucked up and you're going to see atrocities no matter which side you're on. On the other hand, this movie was notorious amongst historians for its many inacuraccies in portraying tank-to-tank combat during WW2.
Pretty much the only thing that bugged me about this movie was during the Tiger 1 fight. Not that it was alone or did weird stuff, but that when the Fury tank with a 76mm high velocity didn’t penetrate the Tiger’s front armor. It was more than capable of doing so with either solid shot or filler rounds, especially at the point blank range that it was dishing out hits
the tiger ambush scene is always irritating for a couple of reasons... 1. to stop a convoy you first target the lead vehicle then the back and box them in. the tiger doesnt do this and at this point of the war german tank commanders would be very experienced that said fury wouldve been the tank targeted first. 2. fury was a 105mm m4 Sherman, this meant it was realistically the biggest threat to the tiger compared to the other 3 75mm shermans in the scene giving it more reason to be targeted 1st. 3. the tiger had no reason to leave its concealed position and close the distance, the shermans didnt know where it was, it had the drop on them, and the commander would know this, plus fury the only real threat to the tiger would be the first tank destroyed realistically in this scenario, the tiger would out range the remaining 75 mm shermans and destroy them without them even knowing what hit them.
This was such an awesome and intense film. Love Brad Pitt in this film. The German Tiger tank was a real one from World War 2 and the German historical society did not want that tank damaged. Good thing it did not get damaged.
3:16 That wasn't a kill, the commander just went back inside, also you counted wrong as every tank shown in the movie contains 5 Crewmembers where you only counted 4, in the Tiger battle, a total of 25 men were killed.
I now i sound like a douch but when the germans were cheking the tank and they all fought i dont see why they didint go for the explosive wepons they had
Also I think it’s best if you increase every Death tank one more to it. Because a Sherman consist of a commander, driver, gunner, loader and a machine gunner
A standard battalion (the ss unit the fury is meant to stop) consists of between 300-800 men. Final tally of confirmed kills of that battalion by the fury 81 just on screen So that's a casualty score between 27%-10% for the fury
Anyone else notice how the bad guys have green tracers and the good guys have red tracers just like in the original Star Wars trilogy like how the Empire starfighters shot green bolts and the Rebel starfighters shot red bolts?
Yep! It’s worked for ya,but I like this one of the full scenes of this movie! It’s my dad birthday today but I give it a hug and kiss a cheek and I love this video but probably thanksgiving week! *FIRE!* 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 😚 ❤️ 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
That last battle just seemes so grossly unreal, like hundreds of German soldiers just running around (often slowly) in the sightlines of the tank, 50m or less away...
Let me put it like this, the Germans had a high amount of fanaticism or at least the SS did, but they did not have the time to train them. U.s. bombers were going almost entirely uncontested except for like a measly five German aircraft showing at the luftwaffe couldn't even muster up the massive of Air Force to defend their own country like they did at the start of The Siege. Without that training, is it of any wonder that the SS that was at that time were Beyond incompetent for SS?
Man, the number of bounces that one Sherman takes might be pretty improbable, and the final fight doesn't make any sense, but besides that this is a pretty cool war movie.
Three Sherman's taking out a tiger was the funniest part about this movie. The Sherman tank strat was we can make 10 for every 1 they make and a tiger will only kill 9 out of 10
My theory for Fury and Inglorious Basterds, when the Inglorious Basterds event ended, Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) changed his name, and found a new crew. Leading why Brad Pitts role in Fury has an interest in killing Nazis (he has the same attitude in Inglorious Basterds) , and also leading to his death and his new crew.
I think the counter forgot 2 kills 1 being the girl in the red dress when they where in town which CLEARLY died also. The counter only got the blue dressed one that Norman went to at the collapsed building (required to watch movie to understand my meaning), and the other one being when wardaddy threw his ak47 at the Nazi climbing the tank near the end witch clearly killed him due to the sound of a head being crushed. Just my Theory, if wrong reply.
1:56 to anyone interested
the sign is in german and it says:
i didn't wanted my children to fight
2:25 i am a coward i didn't want to fight for the german folks
Makes me glad the SS FUCK who did those got fucking VENTILATED
Box Tank! Are you like 5 or something?
Brainwashed fools.
@@nejcl3152 well he's 6 now imbecile fuck
@@boxtank5288 Geneva
3:09 *head D E L E T E D*
Maple Gum Microsoft.head.exe has stopped working
That was a luck shot
LMAO Why tf does this not have more likes
@DragonMage5255 what do u mean?
Use a large repair kit he'll be fine then !
5:03
Kid: dad, how did grandpa die in the war
Dad: u see son, there was an American who threw an empty gun at your grandfather's skull at terminal velocity
I’m sorry but is it just me or does the bullets from the heavy mg’s remind you of the laser fire from Star Wars
Davis Bass they’re supposed to be Tracers but yes
You got it bro
Since when does one single bullet take of a leg.
@@bicycleman7474 a 50 cal is a big scary round so you can bet your butt it'll blow off some one's leg
@@bicycleman7474 never but think about the rate of fire of the mg42 so 25 rounds a second and every 5th is a tracer so you only saw like this one tracer round but nearly at the same time around 5 or 6 rounds passed throu the leg so no the question is: do 5 bullets take of a leg?
I actually was convinced that this was a sequel to Inglorious Basterds
That would be uber badass
they made a sequel to the original so it wouldn't be unheard of
There should be more ww2 movies with Brad pitt
@@classical4life211 There was another one,but I forgot what it was called
pretty sure that would make it a prequel
0:46
That scene horrified me, That’s so painful to die like that, I completely understand why he shot himself instead of being burnt alive
I agree but honestly the scene just looked too goofy for me ^^" not to mention, if you were burning like that, I think 99% of people wouldn't have the will power to think of move your hand to your pistol hostel, pick up the gun, then scream one last time, then pull the trigger.
Yeah, it's just there for dramatic effect, I understand and of course they would scream if they can, no doubt about that. I just wanted to say I didn't get the same effect as probably as you or he did sinc e it just looked goofy to me personally.
Many WWII tankers carried pistols for that very reason.
@@Warhero1171 I thought they carried them for self defense ^^" plus I actually looked it up and a lot of late war variants of sherman tanks never burned like that since the ammo was stored in water :,D
Most painful death is drowning
“Ideals are peaceful, history is violent” I’ll never forget those words
Ebin Delgado love that quote
so deep! Survival and being able to tell the story
So true....freedom is not free. It is often soaked with Blood Sweat and pain
Very true
That's one of the most stupid quotes that can be said. It usually means the one saying it does not studied history and only learned through movies like this one (that was anything but accurate, it was like seeing a Vietnam bad flick with nazis on it) and/or Call of Duty. Most important historical moments has been decided in long, very long and very boring to read conferences about politics or religion (sometimes both). It has laws, treaties, economy, art, philosophy, teachings and studies. The rise of the modern economy, the mercantile treaties over seas of Holand, Barcelona and Venice, commerce leagues like Hansa...
Revolts, revolutions and wars are not the main focus on history. At all. History is not violent. it just is.
For those of you wondering, the sign at 1:52 reads "I did not want my children to fight", and the one at 2:24 reads "I am a coward who did not want to fight for the German people"
Daniel Houldsworth Now that's just fucked up. Proof that in war, no one's safe
I kinda confused at first because Pitt says in the first sign " I'm a coward " but then I see "kinder" which mean child. Now I know
1:31 all i see are dead bodies
How do you know there dead are you a doctor
Well some are in pieces and have their guts hanging id say there still alive
Oh look that guy he has no head he musts be alive.
D day in saving privet ryan is my response to that
@@kevinsorbi9744 like the soldier picking up his arm?
Micheal Cooper Yeap and guys screaming guts all out
Yes but the american had a big hatred toward the nazist. So they fired on the bodies so they should not rise again.
2:38
Tachanka when the whole squad moves in from one position in R6
This movie is mostly famous for its inaccuracies
+Michael Cooper
That's what makes it so fun! XD
You couldnt go anywhere in the comment section of this movie without a huge shitfit going on. Theres mild annoyance with some of the inaccuracies, and then there was category 5 autism storms about the tiger tank leaving its position or the germans taken turns shooting the good guys rather than in unison.
More like it's famous for triggering alt-right neo-Nazis who don't seem to realize that the krauts were really not that impressive.
They got their asses kicked on every front. And their overrated tanks got decimated by much cheaper Russian tanks.
The idea that the Nazis and the Germans as a whole were super advanced and well trained compared to everyone else is utterly false. They simply were stupid enough to waste money on technology that failed to have any strategic effect, and wasted their time building slow, massive tanks that ran out of fuel and broke down.
The only reason they were initially good is because they had spent years preparing for war while no one else had. But when everyone else got their shit together, the krauts revived an ass kicking. They failed miserably during the Battle of Britain despite having better planes.
Nazi Germany is the epitome of stupidity.
In this little microcosm we managed to start another WWII argument in another fury video.
but yea doesnt matter if its a parody or a historical video, you'll always get someone triggered in these kind of vids
I mean as tiger would not fight by itself It would have panzergrenadier support or with other tanks
Teacher:Today our topic is about WW2
Girls:Ew I hate guns
Boys: *FIREEEEEEEEE!!!!!*
Simple Boi why don’t we like guns, exactly? Not that anyone should, in general.
ON ONE!
Hanz get ze panzerfaust
ON THE WAY
HAIL THE FU- I mean, “this is a day which will Live in infamy”
3:59 hand movement of a destroyed tank
RainbowDestroyer535 damn they thought.
At 3:04-3:27 why is it only adding 3-4 deaths when a Sherman tank holds 5 crew members?
Andrei Garcia I thought that too
Because this movie is full of inaccuracies. Fury’s 76mm long barreled cannon was able to kill the tiger by the time the second Sherman died!
@@ForchinBrewer I agree with you and I really would like to put all the cast in a actual and accurate reenactment just to show them how it is really done
Andrei Garcia and if weren’t for plot armor Fury would have been the first to go in the ambush
@@ForchinBrewer well first would be the lead tank then the last then "fury" in my opinion
5:03 makes me laugh so hard
why?
k9bonehitter he straight up threw his gun at a guy
Lol Jeremy Renner and Brad both fought the same style
Same
How tf is that deadly enough
"Best job I ever had!"
4:16 lol hes walking on fire he said
German : i do believe i’am on fire
Poor german soldier
It appears i hace burst into flames
vibin
The 5 members of the tank have done a great job.
Sadly at 3:04-3:27 according to the count the shermans held 3-4 crew members instead of 5
дошли до Берлина. И взяли Адольфа в плен. Шоубойз
4:16 ghost riders join this film...🤣
😂😂😂
3:02 that part will always give me chills I can’t imagine being in a Sherman tank and being shot at by a tiger in real life the tiger would have destroyed all the Sherman’s but in this movie it had stormtrooper aim
And it moved out of a concealed position, in fact it should have shot fury first because of it being the lead vehicle as well as having the bigger gun.
Apache helicopter yeah the 76 Sherman’s were such a valuable target to German tanks that they even tried to cover up the barrel
Tiger tanks did not fire on the move. The recoil would destroy the final drive.
Doug Abbott yeah and Sherman tanks shooting and driving they wouldn’t hit anything
@@dougabbott8261 not to mention the gun had no stabilisation, wouldn't have hit shit. Fury would've clapped the Tiger's cheeks in 1-2 shells in real life
Just realized the actor that plays The Punisher Series on Netflix was one of the tank crew with Brad Pitt.
Gabriel Johannson yes
Also Shane from The Walking Dead
Last battle scene was Hollywired at their best. Regiment around 200 men with Panzerfaust vs tank! War should have ended in 1944.
Yep, they could just hit it in the back where the engine was
That was the point in the film where i was unable to give its missteps a pass. It was just so absurd how a group of elite German troops just kept trying to push a tank from the front when they had all terrain flexibility to flank it from both sides after its initial surprise volley went off.
Its one thing is this was some crazy over the top action film that didn't take itself seriously, but considering how the film seemed to be constantly putting in a effort to be more serious and gritty that whole part just felt out of place and ridiculous.
Honestly scenes like that in generally serious films annoy me because undermined the point of a last stand if your enemies are so dumb its a miracle they aren't tripping over their own feet every other step how can you really feel like odds are stacked?
There was actual case in real wartime like this. Audie Murphy killed about 300 German soldiers with M2 Browning on his M10 Wolverine. In Korean War, Ernest Couma defeated 500 north korean soldiers by killing half of them for 9 hours.
Dude i was one of your first subscribers, and now look how big you have become. I’m kind of proud
Thanks Jarno!
Jarno Datema she isn’t a dude
Mr No HAHAHAHAHAHA
@@George-vg1me Since when in the hell a girl has a hobby for counting deaths in movies lol?
@@George-vg1me You're super smart dude, you should get a diploma in science.
I'm loving that your statistics are proving that movies based on real life have expediently more kills than horror movies...even if you were not out to prove that
expediently doesn't seem like a real word. I can't find it on dictionary.com therefore It's a bullshitword
@@ChrisPMuffin You are absolutely correct 😂 I was drunk while typing that last night 🌃
exponentially 😂 😂 😂 😂
Actual Wars had much higher kill counts so really it's not a surprise at all. And this war film was made specifically to disabuse you of the notion of War being glorious.
3:07 Imagine Getting shot in the Face from a Tank🤔😂
KTalksSkinzt BullsNshit I don’t think you’d be feeling anything😂
Death is so fast you won't even know what happend
Insta kill.. No pain
At least it wouldn't hurt.
There be no face or neck left.
-1000 sins for that epic scene where he ran outta ammo and threw his gun with the power of a god.
Shia Labeouf has done to us in Fury an awesome performance. Sadly we won't see him more😭
When hes not a ragin loon, he does put out great performances in his movies.
He made an appearance on Live PD and his true self was on display. He's a scumbag.
Why what happened to him
Who would win?
An entire elite Schutzstaffel battalion
Or
The lean mean freedom machine
your average Blood marine I answer your question with another question...
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE, BY THE DAWNS EARLY LIGHT?!!!
That is the appropriate name for a Sherman.
Actually the SS could have destroyed em in no more than 7 minutes
its stupid that ppl watch these movies with "based on history" and they believe 99% that this shit happened. good job hollywood u make history to fit ur narrative and ppl believe it. one more reason to not bellieve the interneyt and media but what can u dp when the generation anfter generation are raised by the internet via phones what parents buy to their kids when they are fking 9 years old
The Wehrtmact had pretty decent weapons i had a couple distant Realtives in The Werhtmact in WW2
For all those ripping the historical accuracy of the Tiger combat and then the SS batt battle you all need to remember this about the movie. Fury is set in April of 45 near the end of the War in Europe. By this time the Russians had surrounded Berlin and most German units had next to ZERO ammo left left alone getting resupplied. Single tank on tank combat did occur in Europe near the end of the war in the area where the US Army was attacking normally it was units of German armor that had been cut off when they were bypassed and trying to get back to their lines. Also the majority of the Panzerfausts where ordered to Berlin in an effort to hold the city at all costs. Along with all armor anti tank guns most of the regular army units and pretty much anything that they could scrape up went to Berlin before it was surrounded. Now as to how one tank could hold off a Battalion of SS troops. The MG42 can only pen 1 inch of armor the M4E8 has over 40MM or over 1 inch at its weakest point on the hull. So shooting machine guns at it would do next to nothing to really hurt the tank the Germans did not really have a good Anti armor gun that was issued to the infantry like the M2 we did. Next the blown shot in the city beyond a 45 degree angle a tank stands any tank stands a good chance of bouncing the shot. Why do you think we do not use HEAT rounds in our M1A2 tanks instead going for APDS are not angle driven and are harder to ricochet. Lastly while the Fury tank and crew itself was fiction all 7 of the battles where based off of REAL WW2 interactions that happened with M4 Sherman tanks and German troops and or tanks during the War. That's right everything here was based off of official US War Debriefings taken from the troops that fought the battles.
Sure. Then Hollywood comes along takes all of what you've just said, line it up near a ditch and shoots it in the head. Then goes along and makes this movie.
@@sirmoke9646 Ok whatever you say big man
Is it just me or does anybody else hear YEEEEET at 3:02
Everybody gangster till Tiger I goes yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet😂😂😂
Nein
Ya
I just got back from over lord it was the most bloodyst movie I have ever seen
Do you recommend watching it?
HapitokP yah it’s a good zombie movie just too much blood that’s all yah I recommend it
Good to know, I should also recommend going to see the Rambo(2008) movie or at least the Carnage Count . That movie is quite bloody and well, just watch it.
HapitokP ok I’ll try it
HapitokP lmao wtf😂
When the Sherman took a shot at the Tiger’s turret who did it kill exactly? I was confused because I thought it ricocheted off
Probably the loader on account of it's slow fire rate shortly after and the fact that only three crew members were seen running from the tank. Just my theory
@@sdslofi1107 I think it was the driver due to it pretty much halting all together, but the gunner,commander, and at least either the driver or loader survived with the latter being killed by the piercing shot/fire
@@thecrtf4953 i know this movie is pretty inaccurate but a sherman shell would never penetrate the turret face of a tiger you have a better chance penetrating the upper glacias
damiansback i think Fury was an E8 model, these Sherman’s where produced to face the German Cats like Tigers and Panthers. While it is impossible for the gun to penetrate the turret at around 500meters, it ain’t on around 50-100 meters
@@vajer3312 yeah its a E8
In April 1945, the Allies are making their final push in the European theater. A battle-hardened Army sergeant named Collier (Pitt), leading a Sherman tank and a five-man crew, undertakes a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Hopelessly outnumbered, outgunned, and saddled with an inexperienced soldier Norman (Lerman) in their midst, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds as they move to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
2:49 fatality
More like 3:09
@@vekuboi good one that was brutal ;)
@@theamazingheavy9004 yeah
Wow, this new star wars movie looks awsomeeeeee!!!
.....there tracer rounds
Thats the joke, it's a joke pointing out the unrealistic use of tracers.
@@aceofspades2923 there used to know were your hitting when sights arent enough
@@crkt9971 And it's obvious you didn't understand what I meant. Tracers weren't used EVERY SINGLE ROUND...that's where the star wars joke comes in since every damn round fired is a tracer. Henceforth this is a joke pointing out the unrealistic use of tracers in this movie.
@@aceofspades2923 thank you for giving me a better understanding of your comment
Also not to be annoying but at 3:02 The Tiger Most likely would of Aimed at fury For 2 Reasons: 1 It had a 76 mm high velocity cannon, and 2. it was german strategy to target the 1st tank in a column and then the last tank. This is a Good movie though and I do like it
I felt like you watched “the problems with fury”.Cause I’m pretty sure you did not know that unless u did some deep research
Even if they shot fury first there was still the m4a1 76 that has the same gun
The director actually mentions this but didn't have it happen because that would mean that the fury would be destroyed and the film would end before it actually does.
Ikr they were taught in training by destroying the leading vehicle stopping the convoy and then destroy the rear vehicle so the enemy can't move back and then destroy what's left. But I guess they wanted to keep the movie going
Thanos lmao ikr
Time to the Band Of Brothers killcount ^^
Hmm. Maybe. Next time we do war films for sure
Hehe boii
Around 60 millions.
The Pacific was made by the same crews but would have way more bodies
How are they firing lasers?
Those are actually tracer rounds. There meant to make it easier for the shooter to know where there shots of going. I believe every fourth bullet is a tracer, and it just looks like they all are because they are firing so fast.
Noah Masi every fifth
Underrated Song Covers Ah. Thank you
Noah Masi Thanks so much. I kept seeing them in these films but I couldn’t figure out what they actually were. Thank you, good friend.
The Poly Gamer No problem!
At 3:19 it sounds like he is saying "What are you waiting for jar jar binks"
The movie that set the internet forums ablaze from every WWII tiger tank enthusiest out there. Good film, but some action scenes I do agree come off contrived
I agree especially the tiger v Sherman scene the easy eight had a HV 76mm and the tiger should not have advance (sorry I am really a nerd when it comes to tank tactics)
Yea I remember how much people lost their shit about it, even videos dedicated to it. It was pretty entertaining to watch the arguments about scenes like that
@DragonMage5255 the first part where they were backing up it gave a clear shot for fury to shoot the flat front armor which will pen
Yeah they were but if you read the journals of the Germans and British on vehicular combat this is about as accurate as we can get. Also the anti tank guns were very inaccurate with them having to fire at least 10 shots before landing a perfect shot. (This is for moving targets)
I was gonna say how realistic it was that the guy on fire shot himself and how cool that was Bc it never happens, but then I realized wouldn’t the gun either have like idk exploded from the heat, or at the very least been too hot to hold and operate
I imagine when 92% of your body is on fire, very little registers as too hot to hold.
the unrealitisc thing is that they gave in to the "tommy cooker" myth.... either the tank exploded instantly and killed everyone, or it burnt and they had more time to escape, possibly with burn wounds, but not like shown.... the tiger tank was much worse when it came to escape routes from fire
2:29 Pak 38 /40 not penetrating the Sherman. Wonder how often that happened ?
Again, I thought this said Furry.
Best comment
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say there were quite a few more. But this was an awesome video!
2:28 is a darn Lucky miss, I cant exactly tell where the Anti tank gun hit But It probably should of gone through Fury
I know especially at that range and who would miss a TANK
shell hit the upper right of the turret, skinned across to the right of the commanders cupola
It hit the sloped hull so it would bounce and it had heavy armor but yea I'm with you that Sherman should be destroyed
@@Soarin-Ancient The sight is not perfectly aligned with the cannon you know, his sight was probably aiming for the gun mantlet.
It would have were it not a bullshit unrealistic movie.
Ive seen this 5x the MOST intense realistic war of WWII I could imagine! great film!
There’s nothing fun about war, if you lived to tell your story then God bless you.
@ CoolP19 , Then you don’t know what real good war is,
Times the movie would have ended:
1:16
2:02 (there goes our A-Lister)
2:27
3:02 (don't bother shooting the lead of the column)
4:20 (Waffen-SS doesn't have a single anti-tank weapon)
None of this really matters, it's just a film
I just Googled about tank sherman. You counted 4 crew actually there’s 5 crew in sherman tank
3:02 just a normal day as a tank driver
I heard: YeeeeEEETT BAM
Only good things about the movie was that it was Shia's last good movie, the girl was very pretty, and they used the only real Tiger
Fucking cool tbh
Yep tiger 131 the only tiger in the world that can still drive
As far as the girl goes, that's a fairly effective form of birth control.
CREDITS:
TM & © Columbia Pictures (2014)
Cast: Brad Pitt, Shia LaBeouf, Logan Lerman, Michael Peña
Director: David Ayer
Screenwriter: David Ayer
Can you do a carnage count for Starship Troopers: The Roughneck Chronicles?
WAIT DO I HAVE TO DO EVERYONES THINKING? The overuse of TRACER BULLETS made this a much MORE VISUALLY EXCITING movie. It can be easy explained that the supply of regular ammunition was low (due to bad supply lines) so that both sides had to overuse their tracers. PLUS YOU GOT AN AUDIENCE THAT GREW UP WITH STAR WARS AS THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES. Big difference here is that both enemies (Allies and Axis) can shoot without missing unlike STAR WARS. STAR WARS is basically a KIDDIE MOVIE masquerading as an ADULT MOVIE.
3:10 head GONE left the room
For those of you saying bullets look like star wars blasts: 1 in 5 rounds shot out of the M1919's are tracers that light up to see where you are shooting
German soldiers :
oh yeah. lets never stop running infront of the tank and never ambush it from the side and back. ohhhh and dont forget to fire at it with mg´s and k98.
it was such a good ww2 movie. the last part made it one of the worst
As I watched this I was reminded of those old Sgt Rock comics from the 60s. Ultraviolent! While certainly not technically precise, this movie captures the "effect" of war and close combat. Valor bordering on psychopathy; laser beam focus in the midst of utter confusion... and of course, the bonding of men facing and overcoming the fear of death together. Superb!
Its so funny seeing these self proclaimed "historians" throw a tantrum over the inaccuracies of an action movie
Regardless of the people bitching about the starwars looking bullets and shells, and the ones bitching about it being crap, i actually have this movie in my top 5 favorite wwii movies -_-
6:00 when guy sacrifices himself with the frag that was disturbing
Nom nom
the rhatigans good lord
1:11 me and the boys on GTA when we see "destroy all target"
Not the best war movie, but he’s pretty good, one of the best tank movies
Sadly inaccy
At least this movie had an actual tiger tank.
I actually thought it's the other way around. This movie shows the war in a dark violent tone, where it's often a killed or be killed situation without any room for thought. It shows that the war is fucked up and you're going to see atrocities no matter which side you're on. On the other hand, this movie was notorious amongst historians for its many inacuraccies in portraying tank-to-tank combat during WW2.
Pretty much the only thing that bugged me about this movie was during the Tiger 1 fight. Not that it was alone or did weird stuff, but that when the Fury tank with a 76mm high velocity didn’t penetrate the Tiger’s front armor. It was more than capable of doing so with either solid shot or filler rounds, especially at the point blank range that it was dishing out hits
5:04 Here You want Strumgewher
Wait plz no!
the tiger ambush scene is always irritating for a couple of reasons... 1. to stop a convoy you first target the lead vehicle then the back and box them in. the tiger doesnt do this and at this point of the war german tank commanders would be very experienced that said fury wouldve been the tank targeted first. 2. fury was a 105mm m4 Sherman, this meant it was realistically the biggest threat to the tiger compared to the other 3 75mm shermans in the scene giving it more reason to be targeted 1st. 3. the tiger had no reason to leave its concealed position and close the distance, the shermans didnt know where it was, it had the drop on them, and the commander would know this, plus fury the only real threat to the tiger would be the first tank destroyed realistically in this scenario, the tiger would out range the remaining 75 mm shermans and destroy them without them even knowing what hit them.
1:32 gets me everytime
This was such an awesome and intense film. Love Brad Pitt in this film. The German Tiger tank was a real one from World War 2 and the German historical society did not want that tank damaged. Good thing it did not get damaged.
Fine Brad Pitt performance.
2:00 Idk why but this death hurts me
Is this a Star Wars Crossover 😂
Did my People had Green Lasers
And yes I know my English is Bad and yes I'm German☺️
And I know there were no Lasers 😂
Tracers mate
Yet not as much as they show in the movie. Every 5 bullets should be 1 tracer.
Wasn't about to watch a movie of the level I hate in every ww2 game. Thanks for the short version.
3:16 That wasn't a kill, the commander just went back inside, also you counted wrong as every tank shown in the movie contains 5 Crewmembers where you only counted 4, in the Tiger battle, a total of 25 men were killed.
I've been waiting for this video for as long as I have been subscribed to you, which is over a year at this point
This movie has more lasers than star wars
Tracer rounds 1 in 5. To know what you are shooting at
That German lifted that hatch and Percy Jackson was like top of the morning to ya
The tally of the Tank Kills are off. I see them going form 6 to 3 for a Sherman. When they should all be 5.
You mean southeast
Another film has has taught me everything I need to know about the human race.
I now i sound like a douch but when the germans were cheking the tank and they all fought i dont see why they didint go for the explosive wepons they had
Also I think it’s best if you increase every Death tank one more to it. Because a Sherman consist of a commander, driver, gunner, loader and a machine gunner
Sonic ring sound Again?
Carnage Counts, Do Shovel Knight kill Count, is a Good game,
A standard battalion (the ss unit the fury is meant to stop) consists of between 300-800 men.
Final tally of confirmed kills of that battalion by the fury 81 just on screen
So that's a casualty score between 27%-10% for the fury
Anyone else notice how the bad guys have green tracers and the good guys have red tracers just like in the original Star Wars trilogy like how the Empire starfighters shot green bolts and the Rebel starfighters shot red bolts?
Not only because I love tanks but because I love anything that has to deal with war
my favourite tank movie
That last stand where the guys were in the tank took “over my dead body to the next level this movie was so damn good
Yep! It’s worked for ya,but I like this one of the full scenes of this movie! It’s my dad birthday today but I give it a hug and kiss a cheek and I love this video but probably thanksgiving week! *FIRE!* 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 😚 ❤️ 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
You guys should do a carnage count for The Revenant! Such a brutal film.
I haven't seen it yet! Planning on probably doing it in January
If the tank of front of fury didnt die they should have an advantage of killing the tiger and the platoon
Who agrees
👇🏼
Fury could lolpen tigers front plate from a 1000meters
That last battle just seemes so grossly unreal, like hundreds of German soldiers just running around (often slowly) in the sightlines of the tank, 50m or less away...
So unrealistic....that last stand is so impossible due to the fact that germans weren't incompetent.
They still lost and they were the enemy.... Who gives a shit
@@yourevilhalf1413 They lost yeah, I can't deny that but people who likes history back here in the philippines gives a shit about realism
@@notspectre1051 then watch a documentary not a movie from Hollywood. Where entertainment is valued alot more than realism
Let me put it like this, the Germans had a high amount of fanaticism or at least the SS did, but they did not have the time to train them. U.s. bombers were going almost entirely uncontested except for like a measly five German aircraft showing at the luftwaffe couldn't even muster up the massive of Air Force to defend their own country like they did at the start of The Siege. Without that training, is it of any wonder that the SS that was at that time were Beyond incompetent for SS?
Sorry you came here for an accurate historical movie about tanks from Hollywood? You’re quite the genius
Man, the number of bounces that one Sherman takes might be pretty improbable, and the final fight doesn't make any sense, but besides that this is a pretty cool war movie.
1:11
Why did this become Star Wars?? Go back to World War 2!!
Gary King those are Tracer rounds
DatGuy7575, it was supposed to be a joke
@@garyking3389 that's also a fighting formation they do to minimize casualties
gary, king of the humans?
I was wondering about that 😂😂
I know this movie isn’t realistic but god dang man did you really have to kill a surrendering soldier! 1:43
Kædëñ Kœwæłßkï u dumb? The Americans actually did that in ww2
Thomas Stanger yeah still a war crime
3:16 nobody died here...the shot just bounced on the tiger armour...
Perhaps injuring
@@fortress2270 she actually counts only actual deaths
@@ilragazzodicitta1452 Maybe the gunner got hit
@@ilragazzodicitta1452 my bad, just saw the hit ricocheted
@@fortress2270 lol don't worry...what do you think about this movie?
Three Sherman's taking out a tiger was the funniest part about this movie. The Sherman tank strat was we can make 10 for every 1 they make and a tiger will only kill 9 out of 10
Fury had a 76 mm gun and could have killed the tiger from far distance and the tiger would have shot him first
What’s fury about?
Big tank go boom
Well said buddy😂
My theory for Fury and Inglorious Basterds, when the Inglorious Basterds event ended, Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) changed his name, and found a new crew. Leading why Brad Pitts role in Fury has an interest in killing Nazis (he has the same attitude in Inglorious Basterds) , and also leading to his death and his new crew.
Quietest tank interior in history.
I think the counter forgot 2 kills 1 being the girl in the red dress when they where in town which CLEARLY died also. The counter only got the blue dressed one that Norman went to at the collapsed building (required to watch movie to understand my meaning), and the other one being when wardaddy threw his ak47 at the Nazi climbing the tank near the end witch clearly killed him due to the sound of a head being crushed. Just my Theory, if wrong reply.
Dragongamer 5257 the gun he threw was the STG44. This was used later for the design of the ak47.
I don't know my guns, I just assumed.