CLUTCHEST GOAL EVER? 🫨 | France vs. Sweden | Highlights | Men's EHF EURO 2024
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Enjoy the best moments of the Men's EHF EURO 2024! 🤩
The extended highlights are available at ehftv.com
Subscribe and don't miss the action: www.youtube.co...
Follow us on:
🔹 Instagram: / thehomeofhandball
🔹 TikTok: / homeofhandball
🔹 Facebook: / homeofhandball
🔹 Threads: www.threads.ne...
🔹 Twitter: / homeofhandball
🔹 Twitch: / homeofhandball
Its smelling the seum in the commentaires.
haha
@romavictor3 "la France" sale clown. Reste dans ton pays de consanguins et laisse gagner les grandes personnes.
@romavictor3 okay racist
@romavictor3 tes larmes sont délicieuses
Ton raisonnement est raciste, tu es raciste.
Two great teams that didn't deserve such a low standard of refereeing, which has been a constant throughout the tournament. This is killing the sport.
Every team got the same amount of +1 or -1. Both of tem. Then it's ok.
What other mistakes did the referees made in the game beside the last one? And why didn't swedes protest or delegates called the referee to see VAR?
I'm pretty sure one of the teams is happy about it.
@@x7zauman910never put any penalty 2 minutes for Sweden. That goal refused to Fabregas with a swede literally on his back is insane. A defender hurtin Porte by stepping on him without a foul and 2 minutes while breaking the huge momentum of Sweden as well. And the last two minutes of Karl konan , an exact similar play happened on remili 2 or 3 minutes before.
At the end the refereeing was a little bit lose on both sides.
So true.
Actually if you look closely to differents sports it's quite the same story, Football (of course), Rugby, Ice Skating, Ice Hockey (NHL), Handball, Boxing, Tour de France, F1...
This is why we need VAR rules like in tennis. The coach or team captain needs to be able to request a review. Three times per match, keep your veto if you’re correct.
I have been saying that for years!! Many games would have ended up different. Especially this one.
I m french i m agree with you hand should be doing like rugby for litigious actions according to me
Var in football, you mean
There is VAR in handball, the last 30 seconds. - makes the situation more grotesque, that the referees didn’t use that option.
@@zarkozimonjic5098 Or Hawk eye in tennis ! You'r right !
I totally agree that this goal was not scored according to the rules. But this throw was awesome!!!😵
WORD !
Slick shot in last second of the money time of the SF. The definition of Clutch.
if you Pause it at the right time you can see it was totally legal!
@@rotschwarzlebenslangand if you pause at a different right time you can see that he first lifts his right foot, puts it down, then lifts his left foot, then releases the ball. So essential he takes a step according to the rule book.
@@AndreasEnglund he lifts up his left foot after the throw.
He took a step. That's not legal.
Il conserve un pied au sol au moment du tir mais ça va vite et pour juger il faut décomposer les images et si on le fait pour chaque action le match dur 3h00 c’est plutôt le passage en force de dika qui pose problème
@@patrickmolina4177 he lifted his left leg before he took the shot, it's not that hard for EHF to correct this and send Sweden to the final.
@@patrickmolina4177nerd
AHAHAHA JEALOUS
Krađa decenije. Nije smio da pomjera stajnu nogu, a on je to učinio.
1. Goalkeeper was in motion while passing the ball to Mem
2. Mem made an offensive foul
3. The subsequent foul on Mem was at 12m, not 10m
4. Prandi lifted the standing foot
Sweden should appeal
5. Sweden goes home.
@ivanbilu7081 if Sweden is clever , they simply score before that , and then would lead by 2 goals and win the game. they have themselves to blame.
read the rules first, prandi didnt break any rule, only one foot has to touch the floor while throwing the ball
@@tk80mufa5 Except for they did and Gottfridsson took 3 steps CLEARLY in the replay. The refs are a disgrace...
But you can’t switch foot mid-throw which he does making the swedish wall position made from his original foot-stance useless.
These refs are a disgrace. The last second goal was clearly a fot fault and the refs don't even check the replay? Fine if they award the goal after reviewing the replay and somehow don't recognise it as a fot fault. But why can't they even try to check the replay?
And yes i'm Swede and a sore loser because we shouldn't have lost.
Is there VAR room in Handball also?
@@fraerot no room , just behind the timekeeping staff , refs have two go up a couple of rows , there is a guy with two (?) screens
they use it regulary, isnt that problematic like in football @@fraerot
It is really difucult to notice immidiatly. And I also noticed that noone from the swedish site have pointed out to thw refs to go and checked the regulariry of the goal. Once again we can now talk about iregularity but if we are honest enough its hard to notice immidiatly right on the spot.
I don't think that something big will happened (like give the victory to sweden) except maybe that the refs will be send home
Ref not even watching his feet. Great goal that never should have been allowed. Sport is brutal sometimes. But referees need to keep higher standards than in this tournament. Grats France from a Swede
There are many other actions where VAR is not used (like touching the zone before releasing the ball, especially for wingers that score and there are many goals that should have been disallowed if VAR were used in these cases, but this is well-know tolerance in this sport).
@@dommartin8814 there are so many times during a game where the players are on the verge of touching the zone before shooting that if would break this sport appart if you ask for the VAR each time. For 20 years all the rules are made to increase rythm of handball, It is better it stays this way even if it induces mistakes ; they should equalize in the long run anyway.
This is potentially the last shot of the game with no clock running and it decides who wins the game. It should have been checked. Simple.
No, as the referees never checked VAR for such actions (exactly like touching the zone, travelling) and they allow a certain tolerance.
If they would have checked this, they would have checked many other actions during the game, but the VAR is not used like this.
@@mattiasgamin3891
Yep, I totally agree with you.
It's known that there is a tolerance for many actions such as touching the zone before shooting, travelling, charges and other situations such as the Prandi's shot.
But obviously, many here don't know this fact...
@@vincentv.9729
Swede can be upset as they 99.9% chance of winning and frame by frame and not in real time, it was a controversial goal. But be aware that nobody complained against it.
But let's not pretend they did not have major break as well. First half a guy walked 6 steps scored a goal. Second half middle defender climbs on the back of Fabregas, not two minutes and disallowed goals for a penalty.
Defender stepping on porte, porte was hurt and no foul, no two minutes.
So many zone defense, it was uncountable and then only penalties.
Konan taking two minutes while 3 minutes earlier exact same thing happened on remili and nothing.
So yes Swedes can be disappointed but let's not pretend referees were one sided.
Prandi goal was so unexpected that everybody were stunned.
As a French, thank you to be humble, referees were very bad with the two teams. You have an amazing goalkeeper 😅🙄🫨
Good luck against Germany !
Even when it was cheated (which it wasn’t as most neutral handball experts say) it was not like the cheat gave the opportunity for an easy goal. This throw lead probably only once in 100 tries to a goal with the same technique. Best handball goal ever at the euros
@@sehu1291 French trainer said more 1 to 1000 ;-)
@@Superfootix yeah in an match probably more like 1 to 1000. In training 1 to 100
@Superfootix you are listing and crying like a typical whiny French coward and bringing up some imagined wrongdoings against France.
But mention none for the other team.
Typical Franco-centric colonial power attitude.
And the French wonder why nobody likes them.
Ehf take your responsibility and show that you care about fair play. If you allow a rule error like this, trust in your association and how you act will hit rock bottom.
And here, as a referee, you can't even have the feeling to "take a look" at the situation when the player is lying straight up in the air. Your gut feeling should at least say that you should review this.
I think there's corruption in the EHF. There were two macedonians who took brides before on the tournament.
A rule error ? There's no error : his foot is sliding on the ground, so the rule is respected.
Espèce d abruti pleureuse qui ne connait rien
@@durandil Foot sliding on the ground is okay? So, he can just move away from the wall completely before taking his shot?
Cry more, loser.
The fact that they didnt check the VAR at the last second for the game that leads to the FINAL tells you everything you need to know,corrupt to the core,also until we get a timer that everyone can see for each team to attack and not rely on judges,handball will always be controversial
I mean they literally arent allowed to. The problem is in the rules, not the refs.
Goal completely valid. You don't know the rule.
@@pablo4871 I never said it was invalid?
The goal confirmed invalid by head of the federation today. VAR should have been used as well, crystal clear.
@@jonasjacobsson5696 it wasnt? Protest was pushed back and (at least in Germany) there were several news stories showing why it was a valid goal.
The IHF laws of the game and rule 15 could nevertheless prove the French right. "Before the execution of the throw, the thrower must stand in the regular position imposed by the throw. The ball must be in the hand of the thrower (15:6). During the execution, except in the case of a return (12:2) and throw from the faceoff zone (10:3b), the thrower must have part of the foot in constant contact with the ground until the ball is released (10:3b ).The other foot may be lifted and lowered several times (rule 7:6)." It is therefore the dropping of the ball which raises questions on the Swedish side. => there will be a doubt, the outcome won't be overturn
Won't be overturned, but there is no doubt that the goal was irregular. He lifted both feet before throwing the ball.
@@GoranAbraxasthere is a doubt , so...
@@papatango5085 if you know the rules, have working eyes, and access to this video, then no, there isn't any doubt.
Please, more salt, for my FRENCH FRIES@@GoranAbraxas
@@CamilleDeveveraux you mean African fries? Have you bought your congas already? 😘
How much cash did the refs get for the final 2 minutes what a disgrace! 1 ball clearly lost, and then they dont even go and check the final goal, that was clearly sketchy
its the same refs that stole swdens last goal aginst denmark too totally paid, how are they even refs?
Whinge whinge. Took 69 minutes for Sweden to get their first two minutes but the refs were against them? laughable.
And who paid them, the French??
Come on...
@@jesperbostrom5739 33-23 Norway-Sweden, don't forget, without "referees griefing". And the main highlights were Palika + the magic free throw from Prandi.
@@OphisRenne bringing in the pointless Norway game into your argument really makes no sense
here in Germany they are even talking about a much needed format change to the tournament to prevent these useless last main round games
Nice goal
It's normal to be disappointed. But asking that Prandi’s goal be invalidated is simply childish. The Swedish team thought they had won but no, they had to wait for the French shot. And then there was the overtime. The Swedes lost with a 4-goal margin. It's sport. You have to accept things. Congratulations to the French players, exceptional competitors. The endless discussions about the validity or otherwise of the position of Prandi's feet when he scored his goal are just ridiculous.
There were three crucial situations in the final moments where the referees could have used VAR, but not once did they use it.
Whats the point of rules in this sport, when the referees do as they wish
Agree
Ref was unfair to both teams anyway
@MultiDarkghost refs are not forced to review like in Football , they themselves have to go want to check with Video Review
but in essence , i agre with you, they should have calmed everyone down and checked multiple times the Video Replay 📺
Swedish frustrating here... VIVE LA FRANCE!!!
Huge fraud. Both feet of the shooter moved before the ball left his hand. Not a goal.
@@sandorrehak8923 And why do a stupid fault for their last attack instead of playing time ? And why when they had 15 sec to hold they did again a stupid fault that lead to this situation ?
Easy to blame the referee, if they were professionnals, this situation should have never happened !
France in the final, so great!!! Most awesome goal I have ever seen!
Too bad it's illegal.
@@ktom5262 it's a pity Poland could not beat Faroe Islands (who have 54k inhabitants) with more than 4 goals difference.
@@jeanbroquart7944 LOL dude, are you 12? What a childish reaction. My team could be Mauritius or Afghanistan for all I care, and I still could say a goal is illegal when it is.
@@ktom5262 🤣
@@jeanbroquart7944 when you have to go completely off topic to make the weakest arguement possible.
How pathetic
Scandal...it's not the first time VAR is not used when needed..congrats sweeden you should be in the final
🤪🇨🇵
Le but est totalement légale, la France 6 fois championne du monde, 3 fois médailles d'or olympique alors ferme ta bouche .
true
im from denmark and i was hoping that sweeden would win
Cry
In critical moments like this, especially at the end of a tight game, use the technology. Two great teams with France dominating in 1st half, then Sweden coming back in the 2nd half, and of course the ref clowns ruined it again. Palika beast mode a classic, Sweden should be in the final
1:51 Main highlights, and Desbonnet was only a "substitute" goalkeeper for this overtime. You could've scored more but you didn't. And honestly, I have mixed feelings considering that you got defeated by Norway before that (which isn't even the Norway women team) by 10 points. And don't throw the excuse of "We lost that one because it was our B team substitutes" lol. The refs weren't the best one but don't say you should deserve the spot in finals after what you showed against Norway...
@@OphisRenne what is your obsession with the Norway game?
that was completely pointless anyway and has nothing to do with this semifinal. absolutely no argument.
You´re a dork. Your logic doesnt make any sense what so ever@@OphisRenne
What a disgrace, it should be Sweden and Denmark in that final!
It should be. I've read Sweden put in a complaint and EHF is considering it. If they are, there's no way in hell they can spin this off to keep France going to the final.
@@filips989Ive never heard of such a protest being succesfull, but what is more there were 2 clear attacking mistakes from france in last 2 minutes. I havent seen anything like this in a long time
@@filips989😢
Non la france c'est le plus grand pays du handball
Sore loser.
Si on revient sur la legitimité du but de Prandi à la fin du temps réglementaire, on peut revenir aussi sur le beau but, mais marché de Gottfridsson sur le but à 58:40 du match (permettant le +2 pour la Suede, pied gauche appui 0, il fait un gauche droite, puis gauche droite... il fait 4 pas)...
Comme d'autres l'ont deja évoqué, si on revient sur chaque action pour savoir si elle est legitime, on va avoir des matchs de 4h...
D'autant que le but de Prandi permet juste à la France d'arracher les prolongations, la Suede avait 10 minutes pour demontrer qu'elle meritait la victoire, mais finalement elle ne l'a pas fait, et la France a su être meilleure.
La France a montré plus de determination sur ce match, comme l'Afrique du Sud en quart du mondial de rugby contre la France.
Bien joué à la Suède, bien joué a la France et bien joué aux arbitres c'était un tres beau match.
Pause at 1:53 in 0.25 speed. Left foot clearly in the air
But the right is still on the ground
@@marcelmorlaas8371 haha wtf! 😄
It's in the air AFTER the ball left
@@ogamiitto8627no
@@marcelmorlaas8371he switched foots, so it is not legal
Everyone crying about Prandi's goal being supposedly illegal but nobody talks about the swedish wall moving which is also illegal or all the bad ref calls leadint to Sweden catching up with France
Biggest disgrace. There must be a investigation for corruption or matchfixing a against those referees. How can they choose, NOT to see video from the freethrow, when he is that far away from his start point, when the ball is released from his hands.
Sports corruption and matchfixing is everywhere now.
The refs were ok throughout the match , except the finale 2 minutes , as happens far too often in Handball , it turns into a complete mess 🙈
Forcément on aime pas perdre personne aime perdre on peut dire que la France a eu de la chance surtout Elohim prandi mais c'est le jeu du handball donc arrêté de toujours remettre la faute sur les arbitres même si ce sont de bons bouc-émissaire
@@handball_26 yes because taking a step which is prohibited in the rules is ok for france but you would prolly be screaming the sme if it was allowed for sweden you disfunctional speaker.
You're too angry🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🇨🇵🇨🇵
Monster goal. And yes, it was legal.
A bit confusing seeing the EHF calling this "a referee miss that unfortunately should not have happend" in todays press conference but at the same time calling it a "clutch move" for a click bait video title. Sad for the great sport of handball.
Rule 15.1: Except when executing a throw-off, the thrower must continuously touch the floor with part of one foot during the execution of the throw until the ball has left the hand. The other foot may be repeatedly lifted off the floor and put down again (see also 7:6).
The thrower must remain in this position until the throw has been executed (15:7, 2ndand 3rd paragraphs).
--> Prandis goal is disallowed!
The losers know the rules better than everyone. Everytime...
Regardez bien je ne suis pas si sûr que le pied ais décollé du sol j'ai regarder la vidéo a plusieurs reprises et au début cela me paraissait évident qu'il l'avait soulevé mais en regardant a nouveau on voit que le pied ne décolle pas
Du moins c'est ce que j'ai vu
Et de toute manière la régle de base du handball est que l'arbitre a TOUJOURS RAISON même si il a tort
Prandi wasn't knifed in the back enough times =_=
🇨🇵🇨🇵🤪🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🇨🇵
Its hard to believe they validated this goal. He changes the foot
No look again it s best goal that i ve never seen congrats france
parle français ducon@@christophegauducheau9027
Clearly lifts his left foot. That shot wouldn't have been possible otherwise
@@christophegauducheau9027 What are you talking about? But it was not a valid goal if they had looked at VAR.. Slow it down to 0.25 and look.. His left foot moves like 20-30 centimeters before the ball leaves his hand. so no goal.
@@thomasandersen1642 yess but c est la vie it was an amazing goal and well done France sorry suede one another time it was a good match between two good teams
Refs garage before match: Empty
Refs garage after Match. A mercedes is there with a note that says: "Merci for a job well done."
No, a bunch of French chocolates
AHAHAHAHA BE MAAAAD
hahaha, I don't think our federation can afford that kind of briberies, a basket full of fine food specialties is more realistic...
we'll send them a Dacia if anything
the entry-level model then 😂 @@St0rrrm
Illegal goal…he moved his standing foot
@vladimirmiovski9669 the goal itself according to neutral experienced professional refs is a regular goal ....................................... what is the actual problem is the scene leading up to it and the possible wrong distance ( too short )
@@tk80mufa5 And according to the literal rules of the IHF, it's an invalid goal. Stop making up these posts about "neutral experts" claiming it's a goal, because of it's just a straight up lie. Not a single "neutral expert" has made any such statements. Rule 15 in the IHF rule book, plain as day, time to read and stop making things up.
@@DisturbedNorwegian no , i am sorry , but are you a ref yourself ?
according to German sports media which can be neutral in this case , the interpretation of the rule allows for a foot switch as long as at least one foot is slightly touching the ground even if only with toes , it is a regular clean good goal
the rule doesn't specify that the foot contact has to be the same continuous foot
i would post the direct link shortened , but even that YT or admin seems to have deleted multiple tries of me yesterday posting the article ( which obviously you would need to translate )
apart from that , i agree that some changes need to be made , refs should have checked the Video Review , also because of the in my view problematic situation with the possible Mem offensive foul or if defensive foul - wrong distance for the free throw
there where multiple problems during the finale minute unfortunately
but let's not forget , that the Swedish team was also leading by two goals and managed to choke / bottle it .
I love how there is a rule that says they can review any goal in the last 10 minutes of play, and they decide that it wasnt necessary
The ending of the second half was really messy and i think the referees lost a bit the control of their match, some decisions were quite strange. I am not going to lie, as a French supporter, i celebrated Prandi's goal with passion . Also as a former goalkeeper i appreciated Palicka's match especially in the second half when he went full beast mode. I hope his ankle his allright and he will be able to play for bronze medal on sunday.
If there is any fairness in the world of handball and the @Ehf Home of Handball has any spine Andreas will be playing a final against Denmark
I don't think it will be the case. I understand the frustration of the Swedish fans and players, but in every sport(football, handball, rugby...) the requests post-match are never successful because the federations do not want to disavow their referees even though they made mistakes.
Such a Scandal! Biggest steal of a victory that referees have ever made! And on top of the false freethrow Swedens last goal should have been allowed! The standard of the referees is so low. Each game should have an independent supervisor that have the right to say when VAR should be used.
This is absurd! Make this right! Sweden to the final!
So..We don't need next Olympic tournament in Paris..France is next Olympic Winner. Ask EHF and referees..
Ta gueule !! On est la plus grande nation du handball
@@brunolebris6264 Karabatić is almost out. Then like Croatia..First in Africa
Sorry, Egypt
Le "ta gueule" est superfétatoire, mais je suis assez d'accord avec le reste@@brunolebris6264
Seum en approche
😅😅😅😅
I don't understand why Sweden just not keeping the ball til the end?😢
Anyway refs are nighmare here...
Mouhahaha... VIVE LA FRANCE!!!
@@eliphaslevi7154Vive la Cheater
Yeah big mistake from Sweden here, this is worst than the referee ! This situation min 60 should have never happened, they trolled the game alone
🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡
1 thing: this team is still young and unexperienced and thought it was game over. They won't make that mistake again.
I didn’t route for Sweden or France, but that step is scandal and a disgrace
what's even more questionable is the DISTANCE , it probably should have been further back from the goal
stop cryin losers 😭😭
Vous êtes aigris.
Even when it was cheated (which it wasn’t as most neutral handball experts say) it was not like the cheat gave the opportunity for an easy goal. This throw lead probably only once in 100 tries to a goal with the same technique. Best handball goal ever at the euros
@@sehu1291even ehf themselves said that it was an unlawful goal and that it should have not been allowed
Funny that Sweden protests against this. We didn't hear any protest when they got extra time against Denmark. lol
@lonelyspirit25 well in that game , it could be argued the refs failed to call passive play correctly , therefore delaying the game
the ending of that game was a giant mess as well and was also mentioned as one of three occasions during the tournament where refs weren't right
the third one i can only speculate to be the Germany-Iceland game and Köster's goal doing a clear steps fault
Le but de Prandi est complètement dingue mais effectivement après visionnage du ralenti son pied d'appui décolle bien du sol avant que le ballon ne soit lâché. À vitesse réelle c'est quasiment impossible à voir pour un arbitre. C'est comme pour les innombrables potentiels appuis zone des ailliers très difficiles à juger. Les arbitres auraient pu consulter le VAR mais ils ne l'ont pas fait, c'est comme ça.
Ceci étant dit je ne vais pas pleurer les suédois qui nous ont éliminé en demie de l'euro 2022 sur une fin de match plus que litigieuse avec cette faute ant-ijeu sur LENNE qui aurait dû nous donner un jet de 7m et nous offrir une potentielle prolongation. Les arbitres là aussi n'avaient pas consulter le VAR, c'est comme ça.
1-1 balle au centre.
Vision au ralenti plus arrêt sur image il a toujours le pied droit en contact avec le sol lorsque le ballon quitte sa main, tout se joue sur l'interprétation de la règle.
@@marcelmorlaas8371 Mais c'est le pied gauche qu'il faut regarder car c'est celui qu'il choisit comme pied d'appui étant donné qu'il lève d'abord son pied droit. Et changer de pied d'appui en plein mouvement c'est interdit, c'est compté comme un pas. À partir du moment où il lève son pied droit son pied gauche est de facto son pied d'appui et celui-ci ne doit pas quitter le sol avant que le ballon ne soit parti.
C'est bizarre j'ai fait la même chose pour couper l'action image par image sur mon logiciel de montage très précis là-dessus (il me permet entre autre de calculer mes chronos sur circuits au 100e de seconde près) et je constate TOTALEMENT l'opposé de ce que tu dis : JE CONFIRME DONC même si ça va très vite, c'est là l'exploit de ce coup-franc, que son pied est bien encore en contact avec le sol lorsque le ballon part de sa main, le BUT EST VALABLE et INCROYABLE en tout, vitesse, angle trouvé et force de bras !
Du coup c'est quoi le but de poster ton mensonge ? Ta vie est triste et solitaire et tu cherches de amis en espérant beaucoup de "J'aime" sur cette vidéo "internationale" de tous les fans des équipes adverses de la France qui en ont marre de voir leur équipe nationale se faire régulièrement laminer par les Bleus depuis presque 30 ans ? Ou/et tout simplement vu ton pseudo de comique passéiste, tu es juste un "bon" héritier de ces traitres perfides et vendus aux rosbifs durant toute la Guerre de 100 ans (ou presque) ?
@@clio2rsminicup Ton message est rempli de haine et d'agressivité et tu me parles de vie triste...
Tu me parles de mensonge mais il est clair que t'es juste un mec malhonnête. Sur les images de la réalisation et en activant la lecture lente CZcams on voit clairement que le pied quitte le sol (désolé je n'ai pas utilisé de logiciel de montage). Ensuite tu me parles en gros de vendre mon pays pour des likes d'européens ou étrangers mais j'ai rédigé mon message en français, pas sûr que ça soit l'idéal pour récolter des likes d'européens non francophones. De plus je dis clairement en deuxième partie de message que je n'ai aucune compassion pour les suédois étant donné qu'ils nous ont baisé il y a 2 ans en demie de l'Euro 2022 sur une action litigieuse là aussi.
Et puis si tu étais parti faire un tour 2 minutes sur ma chaîne voir le contenu auquel je suis abonné et que je consomme tu verrais que vendre mon pays aux étrangers ce n'est pas le genre de la maison et que je suis un fier nationaliste patriote. Et pour le tacle sur la Bourgogne t'es bien gentil mais me parle de passéisme quand tu fais des références à la Guerre de Cent Ans.
@@clio2rsminicup Intéressant ta photo de Paris sur ton profil. Osé de se la jouer Patriote écervelé quand on fait référence à une ville de gaucho-progressiste de merde qui haït par-dessus tout tout ce que la France du terroir et authentique représente. À ce que je sache les baltringues de journalistes des plateaux TV et des politiciens qui vendent ce pays à l'UE, elles ne viennent pas de Bourgogne mais de ta ville de merde.
Swedish people complain about the foot when the referee wistled at 59:58. We should have had 2 sec to take a regular shot
One of the greatest robberies I have ever seen in a handball game. Utterly disgraceful from the referees to a degree where you start wondering if they were paid for match fixing.
1. Not using the VAR on the last throw
2. Not giving the offensive foul by the french player right before the last free throw
3. Giving a very questionable foot fault to Gottfridsson on the disallowed goal before the last free throw
4. Giving France the throw-in which is clearly out by a french foot with no swedish player in close proximity where Sweden is 2 goals up a minute before the game ends.
Thousands of people at home could see the obvious faults but the referees could not.
France played a great game but this match should've gone to Swedens favor without any doubt. I seriously hope they take this as an example to look over the rules and also investigate the referees who will be the same ones in charge of the final game as well.
Robbed? You are not talking about the fact that the Swedes did not take a 2min penalty during 59min of the match (not even when a player shoots the ball in the goalkeeper's face) ,
The Germans and the Skandins have been too accustomed to being favored by decisions,
Mauvais perdants les vikings 👎
@@cedricmatos2329 what type of "I cannot score higher than 90 points on standardized Wechsler test"-type of response is this? Read the comment again. If you can not formulate some type of actual solid response then do not comment. The majority of the handball community clearly agrees with most if not all of the points made in the first post.
Boy is this stupid.
Oui mais alors fallait le mettre ce but, même si les arbitres sont "PAYÉS"
Tomorrow lunch time Sweden will be in the final! If u put this video in slowmotion u see clearly he's left foot is up in the air and the ball is still in the hand
Ewerybody Knows..Now you know, why balkan teams want to change the rules. It can't be in the final only Germany, Danmark, France and referees! War is only for Germany, Denmark and France!
@@vladolorbek5234 is Long since Denmark, France and Germany went to war.
Lol never. Cry more.
Stop crying ladeis
Not legal, and Gottfridson´s goal was... go figure
🤣
4 steps, I know
@@SpaceCadet44 🤣👍
Cry more, loser.
Cope
Nadao sam se Skandinavskom finalu. Šteta.. Šveđani su zaslužili prolaz dalje.
C’est SeumLand des scandinaves ici ma parole
Va voir les commentaires du quart de finale de rugby contre les sudAfs…..
Another ref. with a bag of cash… what a disgrace!!
Cry more sore loser
Did any of the Swedish players complain?
OUI ILS DEPOSENT RECOURS
@@RENTLAU1982 sur le moment personne proteste, ils essaient juste de gratter maintenant qu'ils voient la polémique. Sur une prise de vue de la fédé européenne, on voit même le coach suédois hausser les épaules en mode "bien joué, c'est comme ça".
well the swedish team officially filed a complaint against the result of the game.
But the rulebook says that the decision made by the refs is final, so the complaint won't change anything.
Anyway it's still the most cheated semifinal win since Qatar in their worldcup 2015.
Well, Qatar bought the refs in every single game on their way there, too.
They did. They complained and asked for a VAR check before the start of the extension of the match. The referees did not want to VAR check and the players were afraid of getting a penalty for complaining further and so chose not to and later filed a complaint. But yes, they did.
Once again France in finals.
With a huge help of EHF,during whole tournament.
Discrase for the sport.
Oh now it's " during whole tournament". next step will be "during 20 last years" i guess.
@marko.b3214 they basically played a fairly flawless tournament right up to the second half of the semifinal. and even the last minute decision is not so simple pro-France as you think.
@@tk80mufa5 And now, France is beating Danish team .I do not have problem with you guys but it is obviously that EHF is pushing your team.Ok , it is only sport.
✌🏻
@@tk80mufa5 congrats
@@marko.b3214 iam neutral , not French , but German . Yeah France has won , don't know how they did it tbh .
how the hell are you guys so loud about prandis goal when it was illegal ? This was a disgraceful non call
@user-gg4ep9qv9f the goal itself according to neutral experienced professional refs is a regular goal ....................................... what is the actual problem is the scene leading up to it and the possible wrong distance ( too short )
One of the biggest scandals in sport history ive ever seen. The refs should NEVER referee another game ever again and there is no coincidence they have been accused of matchfixing before
1. France CLEARLY pass the ball on his own foot and they get the ball and score.
2. Gottfridsson did 3 steps on the goal and should have counted. The replay is CLEARLY 3 steps.
3. Before the last free throw the france player did the most obvious offensive foul EVER.
4. The free throw should not have counted
Disgrace to the sport.
U’re so mad, just accept the defeat
@@martinschloesser3476 Yes im mad that matchfixing is destroying the sport and you know damn well that the referees wanted FRA to win...
@@martinschloesser3476u soundt like u are 10 even my dead granny can see goal shouldnt be counted
Nous allons rester humble malgré ta tristesse évidente , l’équipe de suède a très bien jouer , le gardien incroyable , dans chaque match dans chaque sport des erreurs d’arbitre sont commise et parfois sur les équipes que tu supportes mais c’est le sport , j’ai frissonné tout le match tellement que c’était incroyable , nous avons gagné mais vous avez perdus avec classe et du bon jeu c’est un honneur d’avoir pu admirer nos nations se combattre bravo 🇫🇷♥️🇸🇪
im from sweden but france deserved the win.
His left leg was in the air before he took the shot, Sweden robbed
The regulation says: "Part of the foot must touch the ground, as on a penalty : the right foot is on the ground, valid goal".
Cope
Robbed? You are not talking about the fact that the Swedes did not take a 2min penalty during 59min of the match (not even when a player shoots the ball in the goalkeeper's face) ,
The Germans and the Skandins have been too accustomed to being favored by decisions,
@@cedricmatos2329 you French? how have the Germans and Swedes been favored recently , both have won very little last five years , you don't make any sense
@@tk80mufa5 Yes I am French,
First, You play almost all the time at home (Germany and Skandinavia):
WC 2007: Germany
EURO 2008: Norway
WC 2009: Croatia
EURO 2010: Austria
WC 2011: Sweden
EURO 2012: Serbia
WC 2013: Spain
EURO 2014: Denmark
WC 2015: Qatar
EURO 2016: Poland
WC 2017: France
EURO 2018: Croatia
WC 2019: Denmark Germany
Euro 2020: Sweden Norway Austria
WC 2021: Egypt
Euro 2022: Honrie Slovakia
WC 2023: Poland Sweden
Euro 2024: Germany
WC 2025: Croatia Denmark Norway
Euro 2026: Denmark Sweden Norway
WC 2027: Germany
And when I said that referees were corrupt in Croatia-France game, every one attacked me. We simplay can not go forward with this people at ehf and ihf at helm.
Good luck for Denmark in final
Je vois qu'il y'a bcp de commentaires non fondés et avec une incompréhension des règles du handball. Quand on a un tir à effectué, que ce soit 7 mètres ou derrière les 7 mètres, on a le droit d'avoir UN SEUL pied d'appui et le même. Avant le tir les 2 pieds sont sur le sol, jusque là tout va bien. Ensuite son pied droit se lève et va vers la droite, ça veut dire que son pied d'appui est désormais le pied gauche. Au moment de tiré le pied droit est posé à terre et le gauche se lève. C'est un but NON VALIDE
Ps: Translate for explanation.
On sait très bien qu'un tir comme ça, ils ne siffleront jamais rien si il le met. Non le vrai problème, c'est juste le passage en force de Dika Mem
Comme l'a écrit un arbitre en commentaire, il y a une tolérance sur ce genre de situation.
Sinon, il n'arrêteraient pas d'aller à la VAR pendant tout le match et d'annuler une pléthore de buts et ce serait injouable.
"le lanceur doit avoir une partie du pied constamment en contact avec le sol
jusqu’à ce que le ballon soit libéré (voir, toutefois, 10:3b). L’autre pied peut être levé et reposé
plusieurs fois (voir également la règle 7:6)." A aucun moment le reglement parle de changement d'appuis. Du moment que le joueur garde l'un de ses pieds en appui au sol
@romavictor3 Jean Marie Lepen sort de ce corps!
Everybody that plays handball knows that you are not allowed to take a step when doing the free throw, even beginners of the sport knows that. How can the judges allow it when there's video footage to review? That is the biggest scandal I can remember.
Me I remember 2007 (because I'm French) More seriously, when the ball leaves his hand the right foot is still on the ground.
@@marcelmorlaas8371 en vrai on sait tous qu'un tir comme ça, réglementaire ou non, il n'est jamais sifflé. Le show avant tout, les appuis zones, les marchés etc ils ne sont presque jamais sifflés car le show avant tout. Non moi ce qui me pose question, c'est le passage en force de Dika Mem, pour moi la balle doit être rendu aux suedois
he starts on his left left with his right up you ain´t allowed to change, clear misstake and allready been pointed out by several other judges.@@marcelmorlaas8371
@@marcelmorlaas8371yes but the second before that his left foot is planted and the right foot is lifted so he needs to keep that position until the ball releases his hand
How many times do you think he will do it in his career ? Once ? If Swedish had put their wall on their left, never he could put a goal. and palicka does his only mistake of the 2nd period
I did not see sweedish players saying or showing something, after the goal, it means for me that it was fair goal, stop crying!
How these referees even can be involved in a game like this given the history is beyond me. This is an absolute scandal and if EHF even care a little bit they should accept the protest and give the win to Sweden.
Exactly. Those refs have f*ed up big time before and this is a new low even for them. Utterly poor performance combined with an abundance of arrogance to not check a very obvious error. I still can't wrap my head around how this could happen. It's unbelievable.
Pffffff....and the ball in the face of the gaol : nothing.
2 minutes for Coman for the same foul just before on Fabregas (no foul)...................seriously, referee's mitsakes are on the both sides
They allow Swedish team to come back and the make them lose at the end. But what a f****g goal from Prandi
It was illegal but i would give goal to france because if 5 players and goalkeeper cant defend 10m shot you dont deserve win, great shot and beautiful goal
Cry more.
That's sport. VIVE LA FRANCE!!!
Allez la France 🇨🇵
It s funny to read all these comments after the RWC quarter when French complaining about the ref were mocked and called bad losers. Refs are just human beings, Sweds (and especially Palicka) showed impressive mental skills in 2nd half and the tie goal was one of the best handball moment I have seen...
PS: I am a handball referee and believe me, there s not a single ref in handball who d have cancelled this goal for a foot slightly above ground. Same when wingers touch the floor, there s a tolerance when you re not balanced...
As a referee, why not check VAR especially on such an impossible shot? And deciding goal?
I somewhat trust you know better than me but from what I know the wall positioning is chosen through looking at foot-stance (if he has feet planted to be able to bend over to other foot or not). And when illegally changing stance mid-shot makes wall significantly worse and allows for the goal it seems unfair. (Am swedish so forgive bias)
@shivakenvil i agree ............................. France doesn't have much to celebrate outside of sports , so we let you enjoy this one , it's not like your political reality in the present or future is gonna be very exciting to say the least ahahahahaha
@@DanskeGuldfisk Frankly, I have mixed feelings about VAR. The hawk eye to check if the ball entered is super useful and on certain fouls (eg ball in the face), it s good to have images. But in other instances, and that s true in all sports, it just seems to add to the tension and anger. So I think I d prefer the immediate ref call. When we teach handball to kids, respecting the ref (even if they whistle like crap 😂) is paramount. I believe that s what makes our sport free of violence against refs. I am very concerned if handball fans start getting too angry. We ve seem too many refs resigning in rugby recently, in great part due to the VAR. I don't want this to happen to the sport I love most.
France better but lack of effort in 2nd HT. Incredible last second goal. Then more concentrated and easy win.
That is the thing. Talent in the French team is clearly there but I blame the coach by not keeping the players in line. It is like the US basket ball team that sometimes forget it is a collective sport. France should have won by 10 goals if they would have been more composed and collective. their 2nd HT is a disgrace.
@@clementhuge8932 agreed. finally two great comments !
Disgusting last minute of the ref ! Sweden to final corupted ehf sicking me
Bad refereeing overall and especially at the end which is detrimental to Sweden and I'm french. My main grievance is about the ball out from Remili it's so obvious that at first I tought they decided it was a foul so gave the ball back to France but no.
After there is traveling from the swedish player he shot between his fourth and fifth step so I'm not bothered with that decision and then the shot from Prandi which is debatable at best probably shouldn't have been allowed after many replays but difficult decision nonetheless.
On the other hand no 2min against Sweden until the 69th min in a game of that intensity really?
So again I feel for the swedes on this one because it may leaves a bitter taste in the mouth , France were robbed in 2007 in this very arena against Germany in a much more obvious way. A game of fine margins and luck sometimes.
But what a shot I mean since Anquetil with Montpellier more than 20 years ago in Champions League never seen anything like that.
Cope
@@jean-christophefouquet9553 The goal was sick they should change the rules so we get more upredictable free throw goals like that i want more i love the way he stood up facing his teammates with his back to the swedish team;).
@@jean-christophefouquet9553 robbed in 2007 ahahaha -- there was a SINGLE bad ref decision that was pro-Germany and unfortunately made it easier for Germany to go through.
However you weren't robbed as the French team in that tournament also lost in the main round to Germany fair and square by three goals difference. And if that one obvious bad ref decision doesn't happen , it doesn't automatically mean that France wins the game.
(plus there is no certainty the French team would have won the final against Poland)
Illegal shot 2:00
Being half swedish half french, I am happy by the game delivered. I don't usually care much about handball but I can see talent and damn the Swedish goalkeeper was amazing. And that goal on free kick, just appreciate it and don't let your frustration get the best of you..
Prandi's foot is 0,1cm above the ground, not OK !!!!!
The whole swedish wall is moving 1m to block Prandi's shot, but hey, it's OK.
Ok then. 😅
This is blatant corruption on the highest level, and we should have seen it coming. For almost 20 years now the IHF and EHF has made it their mission to carry the French team to championship contention. Not reviewing this with VAR is the biggest middle finger they have given to international handball since Qatar 2015, and it's freaking sad to watch.
The referee, Gjorgji Nachevski, was accused of match-fixing as late as last year. He is also connected to criminal organizations and known match-fixers. His father, Dragan Nachevski, who worked at the EHF referee commission was fired a year ago due to meeting a Chinese businessman to discuss match-fixing. Guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
lol
If you ask me, Putin is behind all of this...
Oh i found it sooner than i though, now we dont deserve any title we won. That level of dishonest is huge.
Too much salt in your diet bro.
@DisturbedNorwegian should be top comment -- however i am not a 100 % convinced , the logical question arises -- if the match was fixed, why did they allow Sweden to make such a great comeback in the second half? surely the refs would have disrupted the Swedish hot streak waaay way before the final minute???
In the final he throw again an freethrow at 60:00 minutes to avoid the overtime. But today he doesn’t scored 😂 but he was again the matchwinner with 3 important actions I’m the last 3 minute of the overtime
it's a it's a goal that you had to have the balls to attempt....the French did it, just bravo
Not a goal
Guys you complain a lot and I understand that it's frustrating, but that goal didn't win it for France, it got them into extra time. We're not counting the other refereeing errors that could have changed the game before that. It's still an incredible goal and refereeing errors happen. It was a great game and a lot of emotions.
France will always remain the best team 😚
Bien sur. That's why they are world champions?
Well not anymore, we lack a great GK for example. Our team is good and his bench is incredible but we dont have an extraordinary "7", like many team got.
Incroyable ❤
France well done 👏 👏 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 incredible comeback in the second half
Even when it was cheated (which it wasn’t as most neutral handball experts say) it was not like the cheat gave the opportunity for an easy goal. This throw lead probably only once in 100 tries to a goal with the same technique. Best handball goal ever at the euros
Stop making up these posts about "neutral experts" claiming it's a goal, because of it's just a straight up lie. Not a single "neutral expert" has made any such statements. Rule 15 in the IHF rule book, plain as day, time to read and stop making things up.
You obviously don’t know handball rules. The lifting of the foot is not allowed and the goal is not valid. Period
SCANDAL!!!
No just sport beautiful goal you re upset maybe next year in olympic games but it s at home allez les bleus
Rules are rules. The goal was totaly against the rulses but France use to have aan helping hand by the refs. France robbed Swedens place in the final.
lol was shooting with leg in the air
It is obvious that this goal shouldn’t be allowed. Use 0.25x speed in HD and see for yourself. First he lifts right leg and then he lifts also left one during shooting, so it means no goal, booth legs moved, which is ilegal.
Do you know even the rules.... he can lift one of his legs
i saw many goals in 0.25x spped that should be disallowed tbh.
That last goal was such a scandal, how can the refs not even look at it again when there’s clear footage of it. So disepointing
The best goal that i ve never seen and now we can win fhe final it was a beautiful match but france deserves his victory
Cause that's sport dumbass, go play your playstation if you want AI's
@yes-ty4de the goal itself according to neutral experienced professional refs is a regular goal ....................................... what is the actual problem is the scene leading up to it and the possible wrong distance ( too short )
but i agree they should have reviewed the whole ending 📺
Sweden 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪 👏👏👏👏
Prandi 🇫🇷😍😍
What a steal of victory for Sweden!?
Why? I beieve you ain't know da rules
Everyone want final France-Danmark!?Goal or not!?Luck
Rule 15.1 : "During the execution, except in the case of the goalkeeper throw, *the thrower must have one part of a foot in constant contact with the floor until the ball is released. The other foot may be lifted and put down repeatedly* "
Firstable, Prandi is keeping his right foot on the floor until he realease the ball, so, sorry dear swedish fans, but the goal is actually valid.
Secondly, Prandi did not take a step, he's just smart enough to begin on his 2 feet, even after the referees whistle. Using his left foot is just the choice of his support foot, that's not a step. It would be a step if he choose his left foot as support to begin and if he switch on the right. But he was on his 2 feet, with the liberty to choose his support foot. Here again, that's not a fault, it is valid.
It is the most incredible shot I've seen in my life. MERCI PRANDI 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵
No. None of his feet was in constant contact with the floor until the ball was released. First it was the left foot (with the right foot in the air), then he took a step and then the left foot was in the air when the ball left his hand. No goal.
@@gudagaava Wooooaw you have a good imagination man, you are inventing a situation here. He never used his left leg with the right one lifted, what you are talking about is the moment he chose to go on his right foot as support for his shoot, it is totally allowed. And so what ? The rule is simple man, you have to keep a PART of a foot, whatever the foot you use, on the ground before releasing the ball, and actually, a part of his right foot is remaining on the ground before releasing the ball, you just have to see it in slowmotion.
@@Bien_se_passer_tkt_pas I know his right foot was on the floor when Prandi released the ball. But since he moved his right foot, the left foot must remain on the floor, so that "one part of a foot remain in CONSTANT contact with the floor until the ball is released". But the left foot was in the air when the ball was released. So none of Prandi's feet was in CONSTANT contact with the floor after the ref's whistle until the ball was released.
One foot has to be constantly in contact with the floor.
It doesn’t say that it has to be the same foot. The latter is wishful thinking and interprets something into the rules that isn’t there.
Goal was legit.
@@henrykaspar3634 Laisse tomber ils ne comprennent absolument rien
Low/no chance of success for the protest. As others have observed, the final free throw should not have counted (left leg leaves the floor before ball is thrown, but probably impossible to see in real time). HOWEVER, once the game restarts, the goal is a "fait accompli" and cannot be overturned, even with video evidence after the game. I know it sucks, especially if you are Swedish, but otherwise we'd spend deciding every game in the courtroom, not on the field.
Please don't @ me - those are the rules --> protest will be declined.
@peavy11 agreed, except the goal is a good regular goal, as explained by neutral professional experienced refs. the rule is different to what you claim.
for me the problem doesn not lie with the goal, but with the distance of the throw in the situation right before leading up to the goal.
as for the rest, completely agree.
@@tk80mufa5 Thank you - I need to revisit the rule. Last time I checked (a long time ago :)), you were not allowed to lift your foot once put down. But like I said: it’s impossible to see in real time and if we start video analyzing every scene, 30-40% of goals get overturned :)
Fully agree on the other point: foul was 1-2 meters behind where they spotted him!
@@peavy11 in German sports media they explained only a foot needs to touch the ground , but doesn't have to be the continous same foot , so what he did is allowed as at all times at least one foot was slightly touching the ground , which seems to be enough
i would actually say it was more like a 3 to 5 m difference. if THAT decision is correctly made , Prandi probably does not score.
@@tk80mufa5 the more you know - thanks. And yeah, I was being generous. That being said: if you are up +2 and have the ball with 60 seconds left and you lose, the first person to blame is in the mirror…
@@peavy11 agreed ! 👍
Biggest robbery"
You're too angry🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🇨🇵🇨🇵
@@kilianpriour565You have no explanation
Unregular goal! From left to right leg!!!🤐
Ha ha ha, there are plenty of irregular goals during a handball match (also this match). Always but there is a tolerance. If the VAR was used for every action, many goals would be disallowed.
@@dommartin8814 Game was over..And they can't see moving with two legs? And then No VAR? Why not?
My favorite 🤩 game
wtf is this? this is irregular hit..Sweden got robbed
Cope
@BULA933 the goal itself according to neutral experienced professional refs is a regular goal ....................................... what is the actual problem is the scene leading up to it and the possible wrong distance ( too short )
Refs are humans... For that reason there has to be a standard and make sure to use what's at disposal especially during ctitical moments. There's as much reasons to trust human awareness as distrusting it. Human error is so common we should be better at assisting for that by now and not let anything but the players constantly decide the game. At the same time Sweden should've done a better job recovering from it and saved the feelings on the issue for after the game as there was still a game to play... But lost all momentum and spirit in overtime.
Highest resolution, slow motion 0.25 and zoomed in. I can see he made a step before the ball left his hand.
Watch it normal speed and you you can see it xD
Poor refeering is fine if it's on both sides, but the referring has been weird to say the least. The last goal in Iceland Germany was very illegal.
Which is often the case in this sport, look at other actions in slow motion, it's the same. I can't believe no one sees that most of the time they touch the ground before the balls leaves the hand, which is why this sport is somewhat of a fraud.
If you zoom even further, you can see the size of this shoe
The defensive wall shouldn’t be moving at all, it is also a fault from Sweden. Ig both cancel out
What a goal !!! This is INSANE !
Incredible goal ... a new area around Prandi is coming ... lol
France and being benefited by refereeing mistakes, name a better duo
Cry 😘
@@hibou4828 great argument, about what I'd expect. Go steal something or bribe someone now
@@heIIbIazer you insult us and question the talent of our players, what do you want me to say? I'm glad to see that it upsets you
@@hibou4828 no, i don't insult you or the talent of your players. I just point out you got a few extra players with whistles playing for you. And you should say "yeah, that call was absolutely wrong and it cost Sweden the final, but mby it's just refs being incompetent and not corrupt" for example. I'm glad to see that corruption and favoritism of refs in sports upsets me too. It not upseting you tells me a lot about you as a person
@@heIIbIazer 1/ no one criticizes when it is in their favor, including you
2/ no fault here
3/ cry
4/ tired of this discussion, have a good day
Tbh the end feel like match fixing...I dont like saying somethibg like this but just too many obvious wrongs at the end from the judges.
Kradja decenije.
There are a good 5 steps after the Swede's dribble. So he walked well (The maximum number of steps is 3 between each dribble).
As for the two feet, he has both feet touching the ground at the same time so he is free to choose his supporting foot while he is already leaning and therefore inevitably the left foot will rise but the right is on the ground.. It's as if he had waited for the referees' signal already leaning at 45° with both feet touching the ground in fact, so it's valid.
@romavictor3this shabby cheap shot shows how bitter you are buddy. Cope
no, the refere blows the whistle which means he allready have his starting position, he then lift his right foot which indicates that he will stand on his left but then he place his right foot on the ground and lift his left foot, so he have moves both his feet after the whistle. the rule is after the whistle only one foot is allowed to move from the start position
If they dont fix this I will not watch a handballmatch again. A competition in corruption is not my thing.
Because of what ? please, give some details
You know that the referees have been accused for matchfixing before? This is not sport.@@Olivezon
I'm sure they care deeply about you not watching anymore
😅@@Maximilian1990
@@emanuel82 can we talk about the goal that fabregas scored they didnt accept and they put penalty without 2min suspension???
I don't really understand what the fuss is all about. The dude has his right foot touching the ground when he's throwing the ball, and he only starts sliding after the ball has left his hand. Seems pretty legitimate goal, even though all of this happened so fast.
Well first of no, his foot was of the ground before he let go of the ball. And secondly he switched foot which is also a no no. Do you really think if it was legal to throw yourself to the side like that that no one has ever thought of it before? You've never seen ti before because it's not legal to do that. It's completely absurd that they allowed it.
@@basquat76 I believe the spirit is avoiding a player to jump not to throw sideline. The Swedes could follow the guy going on the side. Look at other sports like soccer, they even put effect on the ball to go around the defensers. Comment is completely stupid here.
@@clementhuge8932 Oh well you believe, which as we all know bigger then the actual rules of the game. Did i just run into the center of the universe here. Amazing
@@basquat76 I just read the IHF rules and at no time it says you are not allowed to switch. It just says "the thrower must have one part of a foot in constant contact with the floor
until the ball is released (see, however, 10:3b). The other foot may be lifted and put down repeatedly
(see also Rule 7:6)."
@@silverfox97480 Well keep reading cause i think you might have read it wrong. You are not allowed to switch feet. To push this through is f*cking pathetic, especially since none of it matter cause he had no ffet on the ground when he threw the ball.
Honestly making excuses for cheating and bad referees has to be the epitome of pathetic.
We will see u cheats in the final
You're too angry🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🤪🇨🇵🤪🇨🇵🇨🇵
Hello loser😂
It was not legal (though Legendary)... As much as Gottfridsson ultimate goal (the 27th for Sweden, at 1.45-1.59 in the vid) wasn't (5 steps), ans Fabregas' one which was canceled without any reasons.... And probably many others during the game for both team...