Before commenting things like "that particular song or sound was not on a Pro One", read this: The shining moments refers to the synth being showcased whether visually or audibly. If you look at all my other shining moments videos for other synths, you'll see that a lot of times, they're just props, but appear publicly in a cool spot and get shown off thereby giving it a shining moment. I put the song names just to let people know what is playing during the clip because in my first few videos, I purposely left the song titles out. However, people kept asking "what song is that clip at so and so timecode"? So now, I just include it. It seems this is worse though. This synth is still there either being used or being showcased by that artist visually, and studio utilization has no bearing on whether that clip would make it in the video. For some of my videos like the Jupiter-8, Yamaha DX7, Roland D-50, and Emulator II, I included actual studio audio because it was specifically used and audible in the sessions. TV appearances whether it's prop'd or not, do count because it is a "shining moment" for this synth. It is being displayed in a cool environment by usually cool artists. This video doesn't claim that those exact songs were used with it in studio sessions exactly. I just put the song titles on there to avert a million questions about what song it is by curious new listeners not familiar with these artists. Also, how do you know 100% it wasn't used? This particular synth is a chameleon. Brian May of Queen would use 2-3 different guitars with several pedals such as Harmonix or Big Muff with Marshall or Peavey amps... for just on one single riff of one song. If you mixed and matched them all together in a mix, even the makers of that gear wouldn't know 100% what was or wasn't being used. Even if you've read something from a band member, that's not 100% reliable either. They may have left the studio and the producer peppered something in there. It happens. Not only that, but it's been a long time for exampled bandmember or producer or intern, many recordings, concerts, life in general, and most of the time, drugs and/or alcohol. Also, others on here claim models of other synths that were used on a specific song in this video. That's just one sound. If you believe only one synth was used in all these songs, you have never done involved professional studio sessions. Layered with other synths, tweaked, by the end, you don't know for sure. Sometimes, bands would lie about what they used because they were embarrassed to be thought of as users of commercially available gear or didn't want to divulge their secret weapon. Too many variables you don't know about to make confident comments. For the record, I have a mint Pro One and I've actually used it on real recordings in mixes. If you want to hear my real hardware Pro One synthesizer in my 80s act, just search "Jason Mysteria" on all music streaming services and here on CZcams. Thank you for watching.
En general diría q para q un mix set suene a los 80,s tienen q estar los Thompson twins son mi fetiche❤ en esos dos otres álbumes de esa epoca ya entiendo por que me gustan tanto 😉.....Depeche mode también y como no Yazoo.....Skinny puppis me sigue pareciendo muy superior y más underground que NN, me refiero a un comentario q habia en un video anterior tuyo sobre estos dos grupos y como explotaron el uso de los synth
Before commenting things like "that particular song or sound was not on a Pro One", read this:
The shining moments refers to the synth being showcased whether visually or audibly. If you look at all my other shining moments videos for other synths, you'll see that a lot of times, they're just props, but appear publicly in a cool spot and get shown off thereby giving it a shining moment. I put the song names just to let people know what is playing during the clip because in my first few videos, I purposely left the song titles out. However, people kept asking "what song is that clip at so and so timecode"? So now, I just include it. It seems this is worse though. This synth is still there either being used or being showcased by that artist visually, and studio utilization has no bearing on whether that clip would make it in the video. For some of my videos like the Jupiter-8, Yamaha DX7, Roland D-50, and Emulator II, I included actual studio audio because it was specifically used and audible in the sessions.
TV appearances whether it's prop'd or not, do count because it is a "shining moment" for this synth. It is being displayed in a cool environment by usually cool artists. This video doesn't claim that those exact songs were used with it in studio sessions exactly. I just put the song titles on there to avert a million questions about what song it is by curious new listeners not familiar with these artists.
Also, how do you know 100% it wasn't used? This particular synth is a chameleon. Brian May of Queen would use 2-3 different guitars with several pedals such as Harmonix or Big Muff with Marshall or Peavey amps... for just on one single riff of one song. If you mixed and matched them all together in a mix, even the makers of that gear wouldn't know 100% what was or wasn't being used. Even if you've read something from a band member, that's not 100% reliable either. They may have left the studio and the producer peppered something in there. It happens. Not only that, but it's been a long time for exampled bandmember or producer or intern, many recordings, concerts, life in general, and most of the time, drugs and/or alcohol.
Also, others on here claim models of other synths that were used on a specific song in this video. That's just one sound. If you believe only one synth was used in all these songs, you have never done involved professional studio sessions. Layered with other synths, tweaked, by the end, you don't know for sure. Sometimes, bands would lie about what they used because they were embarrassed to be thought of as users of commercially available gear or didn't want to divulge their secret weapon. Too many variables you don't know about to make confident comments. For the record, I have a mint Pro One and I've actually used it on real recordings in mixes.
If you want to hear my real hardware Pro One synthesizer in my 80s act, just search "Jason Mysteria" on all music streaming services and here on CZcams. Thank you for watching.
Hell yeah. My favorite mono synth... skinny puppy 👌
🤘
hype
They don't make them like they used too as the saying goes . But i still have my Pro One !
The Pro-One is a tremendous synthesizer 🎚🎹🎚, it just reminds me of how great the eighties and nineties were 💜
I always wanted a Pro One! I think having the word 'Pro' on the back of a synth would make me look l was a good keyboard player in my late teens! Lol!
Love the mix! Ur always so creative. ❤
I am very happy to found your channel, this concept is excellent!!! Highly enjoyed!
Thank you very much. I appreciate that!
En general diría q para q un mix set suene a los 80,s tienen q estar los Thompson twins son mi fetiche❤ en esos dos otres álbumes de esa epoca ya entiendo por que me gustan tanto 😉.....Depeche mode también y como no Yazoo.....Skinny puppis me sigue pareciendo muy superior y más underground que NN, me refiero a un comentario q habia en un video anterior tuyo sobre estos dos grupos y como explotaron el uso de los synth
Estoy de acuerdo con todo. Thompson Twins fue mi primer contacto con el Pro One y desde entonces quería uno. ¡Gracias por mirar y comentar! ¡Salud!
No Howard Jones?
Yes he did have a Pro One but it was always hidden at the bottom of his synth rack and very rarely seen .