One Piece TCG: My Thoughts on the Current Hot Topic in the Community, "Should RP Law be Banned?"
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 06. 2024
- Sup guys, Vv back with another video. Thanks for stopping by, please don't forget to Like and Subscribe.
Also guys, go check out my sponsor when you get a chance: moonlighttcg.com/
Any extra support is appreciated,
Patreon: / vvulfrik
PayPal: paypal.me/vvulfrik
00:00 Start/Intro
02:20 Results from the East
08:25 Overall Results
15:07 Issues I have with Game Balance
18:21 Promo Cards
19:50 Kid & Killer
21:33 Black Maria
27:21 Summarizing and Potential Fixes
30:10 Questions, What Do You Guys Think?
33:25 Magellan VS ST-14 Luffy
37:10 Magellan VS PB King
43:20 Deck List and Breakdown
47:30 Final Thoughts
Discord Link: / discord
Twitter/X: / thevvtheory
Instagram: / thevvtheory
TikTok: **Under Construction** - Hry
Saka Ban Vid 2: czcams.com/video/5y5womQosq8/video.htmlsi=HKWgTxK843K1895M
Saka Ban Vid 1: czcams.com/video/jiCPc1ZYt4c/video.htmlsi=NMTI2LqtpCVg0FTg
Small Hat Crew, Top-32* RY Sabo Video: czcams.com/video/9UVEkuNijGs/video.htmlsi=vSDogPBAZfokWrBr
Magellan List:
1xOP02-071
4xOP01-114
4xOP02-085
4xOP05-074
2xOP06-069
4xOP08-067
2xOP08-074
4xST04-002
2xST04-003
2xST04-004
4xST04-005
4xST04-012
4xST10-010
4xST10-011
3xST10-013
3xEB01-039
We are not worried about Law in 07, we are worried about him in 08.
Just make black maria specific to animal kingdom leaders
I think leader locking more card effects would be ideal.
But when stuff like this happens, I wish they would be more open to either erratas or restrictions (or both). I don't think leaders should be banned. But why not errata? Like you said, Saka could be one effect or the other and not both. Law could be -4 don instead or maybe removing a 1000 power instead of 3000 to force more resources. If not, you could look to restrict the most impactful cards. You made a great point that Gordon and Max effectively make it so you have 8 copies of a card instead of the intended 4, and a ban on promos could be great. With only 4 Maxs and losing the 4c -2k Law promo, maybe Law feels average now? With Saka, maybe a Hound Blaze and Moria restriction would bring him in line as is (Moria should be type locked IMO).
Anyway, great vid and great insight!
Even when im playing RP Law "counters" i hardly ever feel like im in advantage state vs this leader.
There is no advantage state against RP Law. Law is ALWAYS the one in control.
You have to either flood the board faster than him so you can maintain creature pressure through his leader ability - or you have to swing hard and swing big, but Law is pretttttyyyy good at racing when it needs to.
You can't play outright agro against it because leader ability + Sachi Penguin will remove your choppers, but you can't play soft against it because it will run you over.
Tough no matter what deck you're running.
Play green purple doflamingo. I'm actually focusing on that and in my local events it's about 75% win rate. Not just against law
@b-rad578 I've been messing with GP Doffy, I misworded my OP, He's one of the "counters" but im always still learning, sooo many Laws at my locals
@b-rad578 the only problem with G/P daffy is that, in OP08 when black Maria drops, both RP law and Purple Kaido get significantly better. And P Kaido had an insanely good MU into GP doffy, at least in my testing on Sim.
But at least during this OP07 meta, you're right
Locking more good cards to its archetype should be mandatory.
The same thing happens with Gecko Moria (the character), it should be closed to Thriller Bark. Black decks will always carry 4 copies of him and that's not good for the health of the game.
I dont think leaders should be able to bottom deck, thats crazy to me. Its rare that leaders can even KO and those leaders arent even good cuz the KO effect isnt that strong or it costs too much. Also why arent there cards that protect your characters from bottom decking? there needs to be a way to counter this type of play, like you would counter KO abilities.
I think your approach was extremely well done, I just feel like the fact you had to give 3 cards that should be tuned or released differently in order to tiptoe around this Leader, just seem healthier to let it go in the long term.
As long as RP law exists, they can no longer make broadly strong cards in the colors. I’d like to see it re-released where you HAVE to actually tuck something in order to play out a card from hand
This 💯
New to the OPTCG and your vids help me out alot. Keep it up!
I feel black maria may be more the issue. It provides them so much advantage. Maybe ban her or like someone else said they should leader lock more cards.
Love your content man!
100% great video 🎉🎉
Cards are too expensive to be banning.
I wonder if its worth making a Reiju deck that focuses on don minus as well so that your getting card draw each turn? or if thats the focus is magellan just a better leader?
nailed it, mech unique promos shouldnt be legal. Considering the 7 blue luffy and where the wind blows are banned cause you cant get them. Also, you could have fixed kid and killer by making them 5 cost so the effect sticks to rg law and luffy, and is much harder for him to play.
Make him pay with Fist or Gamma knife instead of gordon and raise, the 2 cost made him way worse, see pre raise max and kid killer and reiju. Having to keep the 3 drop law on board, and stay under don to keep card adv was when this leader took any semblence of skill.
Like saka-lucci, the problem wasnt the leader, it was the cards they got unfettered access too.
neither of the cards you named are on the banlist. There is no card banned for scarcity.
It irks me how bandai isnt willing to try and (semi)limit cards more often. Its a way to test the waters and see if it can help balance the game by hitting problem cards after releasing new sets. Except black maria that card needs a quickban.
Also leader locking strong cards is such a great idea. I would love to see some more off meta decks get those privileges.
I think there needs to be retrictions in how many of certain cards you can have in the deck. Like maybe only 2 kid & killers in the deck or only 1 or 2 marias in the deck. stuff like that and of course ban promos
The problem with law is if they leave him they can never print good 4 cost red or purple cards again cause it just becomes support for him which is really bad... theyd have to leaderlock so many future cards to stop law using them which means other red and purple decks cant recieve generic support
Law only has so much space in his deck its not like hes gonna get better every set if they release 4 cost its rather that he has so many options to build his deck against everything just ban the actual problem in his deck (raisemax/Gordon) those 2 cards are only playable in this deck so theres no reason imo to ban those 2
Is the same argument agaisnt Nami, so now we should also ban Nami? Same with Rob Lucci, and we can still continue with that. Sorry bro, but One Piece needs to focus more in archetypes or the game bans a leader every year
@@MegaA245 what? Nami does not benefit from 95% of generic blue support she is a very specific leader and lucci is reliant on alot of the cipher pol support to help him be played over the main black archetype of navy i understand your point i guess but these are not good leader examples
@@CatBeanxx the only good generic cards in blue arent even related to what blue purpose is. That’s because Nami. If you even see the Impel Down cards, the effects of draw are pretty limitated to the archetype or arent that good, and even there, the deck that play more those cards are Nami decks. Un OP07, they would have so much Good Blue cards, that there would be 2 New versions of Nami. The Shirohige that are getting more eyes in it, doesnt play Edward Newgate and Izo.
The problem of the argument to ban Law, is that it can be the same agasint any good leader. The solution is not ban leaders again and again
Great video as always. What’s your opinion on if they errata’d leader effect by restricting playing a 4c or lower to only Heart Pirates type cards?
Or, what if they restricted leader effect and you can only play a card off leader effect if you first bottom deck/KO an opponents card? If you can’t bottom deck/Ko, the second part of the ability is not available.
So if I was trying to fix he problem and could only mess with the Leader a few things come to my mind (not all of them combined):
-Make it only able to cheat out a 3c or less Character
-Make it only able to hit a 2000 Power Character
-Make it only able to cheat out a 4c Purple Character (since that can offset the Don minus effect)
-Make it where they can only play out a Character if they have 2 or Less Characters on the Board
-Make it where they can only use the Effect if your opponent has the same amount of Characters or more than you
I like your idea as well, would have been interesting so that your opponent can't play into your board if it's gone. The crappy part is I really like the Leader's Effect as it is currently, but the cards it has access to I think push it over the top, like 8 Gordons, Kid&Killer, and now Black Maria. It's a tough question to answer, that's for sure.
@@Vvulfrik those are great takes also. I really like the leader and enjoy the strategy behind it. It was always tough making it work with his initial release in ST-10 because there was a cost with a small reward, plus card support was low.
But that was the fun part, managing Don and discerning what the best play was. Finding new combos.
I’ve jumped to BY Luffy and I’m starting to see just how strong bottom decking is lol.
It's annoying how few new cards (disregarding Egghead) Bandai makes leader-locked, while some obviously would make total sense. OP08 Black Maria for Animal Kingdom leaders, OP06 Gecko Moria for Thriller Bark leaders, Raise Max or Gordon for film-type leaders, etc.
Errata Black Maria to only be able to work with Animal Kingdom leader.
Agreed. It's too good for purple decks. Especially law.
Thanks for the video VV.
I'm pro-bans as a tool to help curate the correct power level and diversity of format you want in your game. Law, like Saka, does a really good job of gatekeeping a lot of tier 2 decks. And while I think Law was fine up to 08, these early results really push me over into ban territory. Sure, they could ban Black Maria and Pudding or whatever, but then what? A new Red or Purple card pushes law back up. Do they ban that?
At a certain point, leaders with strong enough abilities are always just waiting to get a few pieces of support to get over. In Laws case, the interplay against it doesn't have the support to viably hold a space in the meta. I like Law, but it's overtuned and provides too much generic value.
My take: Do the sake thing and ban it and print a new one. Make it require a bottom deck, make it cost 4, adjust the targets it can get. Something. As law exists now, banning around it won't solve the problem.
Speaking directly to your promo suggestion, I don't think that meaningful solves anything and adds a whole layer of confusion as to what is/isn't legal. Especially since there's only a few that are played. If anything, just ban Gordon.
More to my greater point, you suggest multiple changes to make RP Law fine, and that's why it's not. Why adjust multiple points of the game when 1 is the biggest issue?
Anyways, cheers VV. Thanks for rocking brother.
I think just a minor errata should be implemented like the bottom decking should be mandatory before playing a 4 or less makes the ability require the right pieces to work instead of a risk free summon especially when the game is on the line
I disagree with you on bottom decking. The game needs a form of "exile" (MTG term) but i do understand the sentiment. It could be more expensive.
Like many have said, and are saying in the comments below they just need to type lock cards man. If its film don't let non film leaders play it. If it's Thriller Bark then lock it to thriller bark pirates etc. Just try it at least. If it doesn't work then just undo it like they did the whitebeard ban, but I feel like that would make things more interesting. If Saka couldn't play CP, Dressarosa, or thriller bark stuff I'm sure it would be decent still but it would not be the menace it was.
You’re 100% right about Gordon and raise max. Every other deck only gets 4 of a card and Law literally gets 8 of the same card because the name is different
no law list is playing 8, in op08 5 is the number most ppl are on. Wrong logic to try and ban cards
@@vehicledestroyer “wrong” is your personal opinion my guy. We’re dealing with 07, not 08. Can you think of any other cards that are Meta and duplicates?
@@raphaelgarrett2615 there is no issue with law in 07 lol it's literally a triangle format where blue doffy and bonney lurk right below the best 3 decks. It's one of the most diverse formats in the games history 🤣
If there's an effect that counter "bottom deck" effetcs that will be better. Like you can't bottom deck this character then it will be fine. Thats my opinion only
Black Maria will be an absolute menace when she's released.
Give me more decks weak to Yamato!
On topic, RP Law is fine in 07, but 08 makes me worry for sure. Have to see how the next month or so turns out and to from there. He has issues and makes me worry about card design cause banfai clearly forgets leader locking busted cards is a thing, in surprised 10 mom was leader locked lol
Yes
I agree with a lot of your points! Especially about leader locking abilities
I think the leaders ability is poorly designed; it wouldn’t be busted if it was destroy; making him bottom is 100% the issue imo. I think cards should be restricted; Black Maria shouldn’t be in the meta, Moria should be at 1-2 etc; that’s how I’d solve stuff
They should make characters with effects that trigger when they leave the field, not just KO.
I think the Sanji is going to be a problem soon too. 3c 6k blocker that also is a 2k is a ridiculous card
Without bottom dekcing, how would you work around black's graveyard plays?
Mindfulness?
Taking care to not remove something that they can recur.
More cards like 6 cost brook but in other colors lol. Bandai loves giving the counter to a color to the same color 😭
Bandai did act quickly to overwhelming winning numbers from a deck in Dragonball Fusion world. Look up what topku has done in Fusion world and Laws number are looking similar.
There's more topku numbers than law
They couldn't figure out have the choose one be activate main while the other was while attacking
Banning Leaders is not the way, Errata with testing behind it is the way to go. Having Gordon and Raise Max together also is completely unbalanced, 8 of the same type of card shouldn’t be a thing. Type locking is needed for decks like Law imo. The thing is when a leader becomes the most played it gets boring to watch, especially when it’s a mirror match. From a spectators perspective watching RP Law vs RP Law constantly wouldn’t be fun
Imho the bottom deck effect should be exclusive for blue cards, so Law is kinda broken. It should be at MAXIMUM a KO;
Promo cards should be AA of already existing ones, it's not healthy for the game the way it is now;
Kid & Killer could work better if the effect is "...2 or more life...";
Black Maria shouldn't exist;
Sometimes I think (especially with more collections/cards being available) that the Type should be more important at the game, like you could have 4 copies of a card in your deck only if it has the same types as your leader. Otherwise should have a limit of 2/3.
So like what is law was a “when attacking” effect instead of an activate main effect
Edit: and make it KO instead of bottom deck
I feel like they should just leader lock some of the core cards that make it a problem for the meta, like let’s be real: Reiju, Maria, pudding, killer (maybe), even Moria as it pains me to say as someone who plays a lot of black, should most likely be leader lock cards. And I like the idea of banning promo cards, it makes sense in tourneys. But overall, Law in o8, just get too much value from being able to cheat out strong combo cards, and they get so much value that’s it’s hard to keep up. And going vs a law that opens perfect, yikes.
Tbh I think the reduction aspect into bottom decking is whats so strong, mono blue leaders cant reduce so there bottom decking at least has some limit to it, red roc being the exception but I dont think law should be banned at the same time
Bandai should stop just outright banning cards, semi limit to limit to 1 is good enough since all you have to is remove it off the board and they can't spam it again next tuen.
Ban law
There are way to beat all decks even R/P law....😊
Yeah, I hate the promo cards being new functional cards instead of just reprints with new art.
And I also dont like banning cards, I wish there was more erratas and leader-locked effects.
You can't ban promos! I won't be able to play the new Sakazuki leader! 😂. In seriousness though, its never been as advantageous to run promos in a deck as it is in law. For the most part, they are tech only.
Black maria... spot on leader locking to animal kingdom and a simple errata to solve.
Yet another well thought out video... you need to be hired by that card development company.
I cant wait till blue gets some love sigh
Law being able to bottom deck is crazy. I think that should stay in blue's territory. If they wanted to still be on flavor with Law's devil fruit ability, it should be that he can shambles an ally character back to hand to cheat out a 4 cost or less. It could play a lot like RG Law in that way.
The real problem is Black Maria
RP Law in op07 is strong, but not broken
In OP08 Black Maria makes the deck ridiculous
You can use the ability for free
Just limit to Animal Kingdom Pirates and it’s ok
But I agree with the Promo point, promos should not be legal
It’s not fair
Generally I am on your side, however, I think Law has hit a point (especially in op08) where he is so strong that Bandai has to balance cards around him, and that in itself is unhealthy for the game. Does he win every matchup? no. Does he completely dominate by top decking while not having a searcher or consistency? yes. Bandai won't errata him and will probably have a choice of crippling multiple decks by banning certain cards or just get rid of the leader itself
If this is what we're going to do every time a new king rises, this TCG probably should adopt some form of Living Legend. 🤷♂️
Without bottom decking how do we deal with decks that play from trash? If you can't bottom deck against black they just run you over.
quick glance through of the character break down for the tournament results is
6 R/P law
3 Y/B luffy
3 lucci
1 boa
1 doflamingo
1 bonny
1 perona
2nd event is
11 R/P law
2 B/Y luffy
2 lucci
1 boa
As a RP Law player all the way from OP04 I think that Black Maria is the main problem! Ban it, please. Everything else? Perfect balanced and good leader, as many other leaders have weakness and strengths! But Black Maria makes the deck so easy and dumb to play... RP Law is fun because is one of the hardest decks to play (the only deck you can be mana screwed!).
So, for me, ban Black Maria, that would make the deck hard but rewarding and a fair deck!
I’ve played law enough now to say I don’t think banning Gordon/Max will have the impact ppl think it will. I’m honestly open to it since it just frees up more slots for something else and I don’t even run the max 8. Now limiting Black Maria to 1 or banning it from Law would be the best fix imo(maybe pudding too). Taking away the thought process behind managing law’s ability is just way to broken but she’s useless in the mirror match so there’s a chance she self regulates over the next few weeks of op08
Why would you hit a new op08 card which helps purple with ramping. Purple is arguably the worst color in the game. Just address the problematic leader.
Or just say that Black Maria can’t be used in law decks (someone said they did this with digimon ). Just do that and it’s gg
I said to ban or limit it in Law not all together, Maria removes the thought process behind using Law’s ability or setting up for its use and I’ll have to disagree on purple being weakest. It’s not as broken as yellow and black but definitely better than blue and green in their current overall states besides a few decks performing well in those colors.
Yes! Say it louder for the ones in the back! Bans are not the answer.
Say what you want but the truth is rp law has been out for some time and pudding/black maria both release in a new set with OP08. This means since Bandai wants money they will not touch cards within a new set. The worst case scenario I see without banning the leader would be to ban gordon and raise max and limit black maria. This is unlikely since black maria is a new set card.
@@kevinflack7036 I think the better option would be to make it so Gordon and raise Max can’t be in the same deck. There are problems for sure. But banning is not the fix.
Do you have a twitter Vv?
I do, twitter.com/TheVvTheory but I'm not on it much
Players should be given a choice between Gordon and Raise Max. IF you have Gordon use it and keep Raise Max out and if you don't have Gordon use Raise Max as a good replacement
i don't think law himself should be banned. im very much against banning leaders unless they happen to warp card design in an unfortunate way. there are a few ways to address Law, and that is to limit his resources. aggro decks should struggle to keep up after a certain point, but he has a ton of card draw with reiju, so banning reiju may be in order. the other option is to ban the card that he uses to keep his don high. but that card is too new to consider.
black maria broke the balance on the deck
Sakasuki is losing to RP Law in OP06 but at that time Law isn’t as strong as OP08. I do agree that banning Sakasuki is not entirely correct. But now Law is just too strong, mostly I will win only against if they draw bad, I draw good, because their 2nd turn is just too strong, how do you deal with black maria+Sanji or Pudding+Penguin, then more and more to come, is there is even an answer to this 2nd turn play with 4,5 dons.
G/P Doffy does work against Law but it’s still very annoying and not fun to go up against
I wouldn’t say banning leaders is the best move, personally I believe that some cards should be limited or in some cases leader locked that way you can still use said leader but they won’t be as powerful going forward that’s just my take🤷🏾♂️
I was VERY against banning Sakazuki, but Law feels MUCH worse IMHO and I honestly do not believe that card should stay in the game as is... I'm sorry. I've NEVER before been for any bans, but this time genuinely feels very different to me...
Also, I DO NOT like the idea of banning a handful of other cards that only feel broken because of Law. If several cards (i.e. Black Maria, Pudding, Gordon, Raise Max, etc) all share a single common denominator, than it makes the MOST sense to ban the single thread that binds them rather then messing up however many other decks that NEED cards like Black Maria to function at a viable level...
As for gordon and raise max, well there are many functional copies out there. Aka all vanillas. Youre gona have many functional copies down the pipe as more sets are released. Gordon isnt the issue. Its maria
Would it be the worse if R/P Law was choose one? Either bottom deck a 3k or less OR play a 4 drop. That way you’re not playing 8 Don worth of bodies starting turn 2
That doesn't seem like a bad idea at all to me.
Picking one is nice too, however, the biggest issue right now is in the official ruling it say he can choose not to bottom deck and still be able to play a 4 cost for free simply by -3 don.
If they change this to it being the requirements he need to meet or he cannot play a free 4 cost it would make it so much better. Since law don’t got any searchers, he need to draw into the cards. So this will make him less consistent. Since he can’t just -don and play reiju and get 2 free draw to search for his Gordon or max.
@@llshadowghostll I’m not sure I like making it a requirement, might make the deck just dead in the water if you starve them out and start dropping 7-9k’s they’re gonna need two Gordon/ raise max per card they wanna get rid of. The only form of removal they play is through leader ability.
Dont ban the leader, just ban some support like shachi and penguin or gordon. The deck isn't as consistent as sakazuki. It bricks pretty hard and runs out of resources.
Ama no murakumo sword should be banned over hound blaze if you’re going to hit one of them, bottoming 2 cards is insane into decks like law/moria that spam board.
Vv i think youre thinking too much about the top tier of the game, sure maybe hes not stomping like white beard but for most of us in locals having most players run it forces casual players to either spend 200 on on of the other top 5 decks or just lose, one of my favourite things about the game is how lower tier leaders can do well causally, and i think law stomps B> decks alot more easily then the other s teir decks which is why the community feels so negatively to it
Disagree with the kid and killer opinion. Red needs it. I don't agree on banning all promos either but maybe just ban gordon or make it in film decks only.
Honestly there are a lot of ways for them to fix law, but there should not be any doubt that he will continue to power creep if nothing is done. I don't think it's healthy.
the only problem card is black maria. Laws results were not this good before it was released. was it a good deck? absolutely, there will always be good decks. Banning them because you dont like them because they're good is not the right approach.
Sakazuki was not really banned. It was errata’ed. Black blue saka still exists , its ability was significantly tuned down. People keep saying its banned. Its not, still there.. but different
I know this is semantics, but actually those two are not the same sakazuki. As in, the art is sakazuki at different point in time. The promo leader Is Admiral sakazuki with his marineford outfit, the banned leader is Fleet Admiral sakazuki with the white outfit and the cigar.
Im down with the promo card ban lol
your on point 👉 , i concur 👌
But removing Gordon would not stop law
20:20 Kid mentioned!! I love this leader and agree with the sentiment that errata of leader locking the out of control synergies like Black Maria will help level out the meta without banning another leader.
Which leader was banned? Because blue black sakazuki is still available. Hes just different…
@@therealrabbithole9088 it’s going to be banned in a few weeks in June alongside reject once op07 drops - edit that the new sakazuki is nothing like the current one getting banned
@@wesleypollek4637its the same sakazuki with a huge nerf ability. Why is it the same? Because its the SAME two colors. With access to hound blaze, blue borsalino and more. The ONLY ability it doesnt have is the cycle ability. (That one got removed) . Its not another leader. Another leader would mean DIFFERENT color. I doubt youve tried playing the other version of saka. Its not that weak
@@therealrabbithole9088 it’s not the same at all lol that’s like saying sanji and zoro are the same as sanji. Being that nerfed it’s worse off than mono black sakazuki
black maria needs to be banned and reprinted to leader lock to animal kingdom pirates only
Play gp Doflamingo against rp law with birdcage and you will win instantly 😂
W/o Kid n Killer, Law currently has no boss card tho. Agree with the Black Maria leader locking tho.
In OP08 there are builds that run Rayleigh and allows him to board clear with both Rayleigh's and Law leader's ability
just ban black maria is that simple!!!!
please bandai do it
Sakazuki, law and luffy yb dominating would NOT be fun... It's better when you have at least 5 decks competing for t1 and another 5 rogue decks around like doffy, boa, nami etc
Law was really op but managable in op7... In op8 with Black maria, pudding etc is too much and the problem is that in future they will keep printing cards that will just be better in Law.
If Sakazuki was not banned he would fight Law exactly like Lucci does, Lucci already fights Law, you don't need Sakazuki, Sakazuki was insanely bad designed and extremely overpowered in probably the best combination of colors in the entire game.
Rather than the leader, black Maria feels more problematic for OP08, but as a Law player (still a begginer though) I feel that other meta relevant decks like Enel, Moria or BY Luffy are really solid counterplays, plus another means that another leader is going to take Law's place, there's always going to be a deck on top and makes no sense to ban every leader that starts to be dominant, it would be better for certain cards to be locked to certain leader or leaders
It’s been 4 tournaments now and Law mirror match was the final of all 4. Hundreds of participants each. You don’t ban, you leader limit Maria and maybe Moria I think. Most extreme is alter law to what characters it can play for free or only play if it bottom decks something.
I wish they would limit Black maria to Kaido tbh...
I don’t think law should be banned I think some of the cards he was given should either be leader locked or banned/changed
But that means every set, they have to keep R/P Law in mind. That is already grounds for a ban because that will just limit Bandai's creativity with trying to power up other decks.
@@AnimeALX with this logic do we ban nami?
@@wetpotato205 no one even brought her up. Lmao
@@AnimeALX ik but im saying with your logic they have to keep law in mind making cards its better to ban him. its the same logic with nami they do keep her in mind making blue cards so should they just ban her?
@@wetpotato205 no because she isn't topping tournaments. Law is. This was a terrible analogy lol
so ban gordon
Leader bans are not the way
The meta being Saka vs rp law x by luffy sounds awful and very unfun. Im glad saka was banned, i think law was ok until 08. Black maria should never have been printed and some cards shouldve been leader locked like reiju
problem with making Saka only able to do one of his 2 abilities is that it misses the point of why saka is powerful. Saka was powerful because of cycling and being able to craft your hand every turn. If they wanted to keep his identity as that, they should have taken away the -1 when attacking, and locking his ability to only discard a navy card
I think "errataing" a card to the point it's effect is completely different is something that should never happen. Reading the card should explain the cars, especially in a relatively new game that is trying to attract new players.
just limit BlackMaria to "Animal Kingdom Leader" only! Bandai only needs to lay out the rule for it, so in deck checks we can see if decks are legal or not.
Also ban Gordon. That way RP Law loses bottomdecking and don recovery abilities, but would still be good. Like the Gordon will be replaced by Firefist, but that would still be a 2Don instead of a 1Don play.
I hate banning Leaders if we could just fix stuff by laying out the rules for it. As you said i think leaderlocking is the goto!
Limit / restrict Black Maria to 1 or 2. She bypasses the downside to Law. I love the deck, been playing RP Law since I started OPTCG. But she seems to be the core problem.
The fact they printed her with 2k counter is ridiculous.
Other purple leaders NEEDED a card like her though in order to even be relevant. They shouldn't have to be punished just because this leader exists...
Actually, i think banning Gordon is the right move. 8 of the same card is ridiculous
Leave kid and killer out of this. Red needed that card and it's not that powerful compared to Moria or bigmom. Kid and Killer leader lock hurts decks like RY Sabo and he shouldn't get nerfed for RP Laws sins
same. they shouldn't banned sakazuki.
First of all bro, not just japan official tournaments even singapore cs and gao both top 4 also got rekt by rp law. Design a red and purple leader with blue specialty mechanism bottom deck is just straight a joke move from the very beginning kek. Bandai has been really careful on designing blue cards after releasing nami as leader because they dont fucking want to have their own version of exodia deck in opcg and it is very unfair for the blue gang. Because from there onwards , blue is just straight up the weakest color by its own and probably can compete with multi color blue. Fuck bandai and make blue great again!
Not even worth arguing, Law will be 100% banned.
The effect is really just a mistake, red/purple with a blue effect is just dumb.