Spin Orbit Coupling

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
  • How spin orbit coupling affects the nuclear potential

Komentáře • 50

  • @ashleighnaysmith361
    @ashleighnaysmith361 Před 8 lety +14

    I love how you sound a little bit like a kids tv presenter - much more engaging than regular tutorials! Even for undergrads! :D

  • @JenniferHL3
    @JenniferHL3 Před 10 lety +15

    This is great stuff. Would have been very useful during my degree.

  • @LadyShaydex
    @LadyShaydex Před 5 lety +2

    Thanks man real easy to follow and clear, helped a lot to work it out in my head

  • @sarahkanawati4071
    @sarahkanawati4071 Před 7 lety +4

    I really should thank you sir, you helped me to pass my exam.

  • @uhgar4327
    @uhgar4327 Před 7 lety +3

    Sir you are awesome, please keep making videos... ur knowledge is much needed, thanks alot :)

  • @drdeveshprasadbhatt3213
    @drdeveshprasadbhatt3213 Před 8 lety +2

    Thanks for this nicely presented lecturer.

  • @robinashaheen1713
    @robinashaheen1713 Před 8 lety +3

    great explanation, thanks

  • @alibachir6779
    @alibachir6779 Před 9 lety +2

    Brilliant explination!

  • @animeshmondal1208
    @animeshmondal1208 Před 8 lety +6

    What a beauty!

  • @getachewsolomon7579
    @getachewsolomon7579 Před 6 lety +2

    at 19:05, i think, the anti-parallel alignment(l-1/2) is more “favourable”, has a lower energy. That is why l+1/2(maximum J) appears at higher binding energy in photoemission spectrum (XPS).

  • @hannah2843
    @hannah2843 Před rokem

    thank you for this great video!

  • @baharasingh3840
    @baharasingh3840 Před 5 lety

    Best ever explanation

  • @chowonjang2220
    @chowonjang2220 Před 4 lety

    hey , finaly i understand what spin-orbit-coupling is . thanks

  • @faizahussein6326
    @faizahussein6326 Před 5 lety +1

    really wonderfull thank you so much

  • @howardhall2300
    @howardhall2300 Před 9 lety +3

    Thank you very much for these excellent videos. At about 18.08 you explain how the positive LS term depresses the energy level. I,m confused why the positive LS term reacts this way with the negative values of the Potential Well . Again, many thanks.

    • @thenorup
      @thenorup Před 7 lety +2

      When LS is positive there is some energy "trapped inside" the coupling, and when it is negative it has "released the energy".
      In other words, when LS is positive it takes more energy to rip off the electron.

  • @ankushyerawar2848
    @ankushyerawar2848 Před 7 lety +2

    thanks for the video

  • @crystalpeng4485
    @crystalpeng4485 Před 8 lety +7

    Thank you for the lecture. It helps me a lot!
    But I still have some questions, hope that someone could answer me, please.
    1. Why does the j term have only one value when L=0? Don't we take account to the other j value when s=-1/2?
    2. I don't quite understand how does the LS term work on the binding energy of the levels. What does the the value in LS term mean? And why the negative term means less contribution to the potential well?
    I have watched another video (shell model video) mentioned in this video, but still can't find these answers. Please answer my questions if you could. Thank you very much for your kindness!

    • @debajyotisg
      @debajyotisg Před 7 lety +3

      Actually, S has only one value (1/2); it's ms(components of s) which takes positive or negative values and make +1/2,-1/2.
      So j would still have only one value if l is zero.

    • @brendawilliams8062
      @brendawilliams8062 Před 2 lety

      It’s harder to locate the math on one side as a crystal.

  • @baharasingh3840
    @baharasingh3840 Před 5 lety

    I always watch your videos

  • @benmenanaazdine2782
    @benmenanaazdine2782 Před rokem

    Thank you very much

  • @ramysaad1047
    @ramysaad1047 Před 3 lety

    your always the best

  • @PiranhaFlip
    @PiranhaFlip Před 7 lety +4

    im a little confused, why have you said that s(s+1) is always 3/4? when s could be +/- 1/2?

  • @EvaPev
    @EvaPev Před 9 lety +2

    Your voice resembles that of Richard Dawkins. (in my ears at least)
    Good lecture.

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 Před 2 lety

    Thankyou

  • @igorantoniazzi
    @igorantoniazzi Před 5 lety

    Awesome!!!
    thanks!

  • @baharasingh3840
    @baharasingh3840 Před 5 lety

    Please keep it up

  • @dipanshueminem
    @dipanshueminem Před 9 lety +3

    Brilliant video. I wanted to ask, for l=2, what are the possible values of j?

    • @kaiserdostuff
      @kaiserdostuff Před 9 lety

      Dipanshu Gupta 5/2

    • @TheImpressionable
      @TheImpressionable Před 8 lety

      +aknelkaiser Could it b 3/2 as well?

    • @kaiserdostuff
      @kaiserdostuff Před 8 lety

      +Stefan Epler - Snow Yes.

    • @kaiserdostuff
      @kaiserdostuff Před 8 lety +1

      +Stefan Epler - Snow however OP didnt said anything if n=3 or not. So i assume, he knew that much. If n=3, l = 2,1,0 and each j is equal l+s. so, there is 3/2.

  • @verumINscientia
    @verumINscientia Před 9 lety +2

    for the operators on these vectors wouldnt it be more proper (or more easily destinguished from other values) for those tems to have a "hat" or ( ^ ) above them?

    • @kaiserdostuff
      @kaiserdostuff Před 9 lety +1

      verumINscientia A lot of book don't even bother about putting those '^' above the operator, as people assume once you able to reach to this video, you already well known about operator.

  • @ganquan1990
    @ganquan1990 Před 5 lety

    when s=1/2 the term of -s(s+1)=-3/4 and when s=-1/2 the term of -s(s+1)=+1/4,then you calculate LS term in l=0 will give you both 0. then when calculate l=1 LS term should be l*(h bar sqr/2) and -l*(h bar sqr/2). That should be right answer. I think professor make a small mistake here.

  • @dpcon1994
    @dpcon1994 Před 8 lety +3

    Wait, if s = +- 1/2, why is s(s+1) = 3/4? s(s+1) = 3/4 is only the case for when s = 1/2, what about s = -1/2??

    • @Richard-rx8uo
      @Richard-rx8uo Před 8 lety +6

      s is always 1/2, there is a point where he says that s=+1/2 or -1/2 in explaining why j can be l+s or l-s, but this is because j can take values from modulus(l-s) up to l+s in integer steps. As l=1 and s=1/2, j can be either 1/2 or 3/2. Hope that helps :)

    • @djangogeek
      @djangogeek Před 7 lety

      quantum number s for the electron is always a half. But the z component projection m_s may be plus or minus a half. the s^2 operator only acts on the quantum number s and has eigenvalue s(s+1), the s^2 operator does not act on m_s which is why we do not consider the case for m_s equal to minus a half.

  • @fuzzylumpkin8030
    @fuzzylumpkin8030 Před 4 lety

    What happens if you raise an electron and fill it’s previous energy level with a new electron

  • @savosia499
    @savosia499 Před 7 lety

    What about the jj coupling? why it occurs? and in wich way is it different from the LS one?

  • @GlodChip
    @GlodChip Před 3 lety

    Are you sure +1/2 decreases the energy level and -1/2 increases it? Because everywhere else I look it is the other way round. Or maybe I get mixed up with notations? Does j-j coupling and LS coupling lead to different energy directions?

    • @AlirezaNabavian-eu6fz
      @AlirezaNabavian-eu6fz Před 9 měsíci

      I feel the same way..when it's positive it should reduce the energy level since it's negative therefore less energy is needed to release the electrons not more

  • @AbhishekMahajan
    @AbhishekMahajan Před 7 lety

    19.47 spin is -1/2 so there should be 1/4

  • @arpitchoudhary6475
    @arpitchoudhary6475 Před 4 lety +1

    Sometimes you sound like Kane Williamson!

  • @muntazerahmed5261
    @muntazerahmed5261 Před rokem

    I need someone who know how to use it CCFULL programe for the japanese scientists [ K. Hagino , N. Rowley and A. T. Kruppa ] called :
    A FORTRAN77 program for coupled-channels calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions .

  • @haniefsofi
    @haniefsofi Před 4 lety

    Not a neat lecture. I think there is a mix up.

  • @henryjackson7050
    @henryjackson7050 Před 9 lety

    Why call the video spin orbit coupling then go through really basic physics at the beginning that anyone who's watching this video will already know?
    and you don't even explain the physics of spin orbit coupling. what a waste of my time