You guys can't cope, you're finally realising that your history is based on a lie, so you continue gaslighting. Look closely, some have negroid features. Cope. All the 3 Abrahamic religions are borrowed from black African religions. Go and do your homework.
@SteelerzReignSupremeII no. Only some factions from the army called abid Al Bukhari were black, and that’s recent. When Al Andalus existed there weren’t blacks in Morocco
Souther Africans? The term sub saharan is a racist, inaccurate and revisionist term. The black people who were Moors came from.the Sahel and North Africa. Based on the depictions or Moors in European artwork during their rule and afterwards, the Moors seem to be mostly made up of Black Africans. And all wither from Ethiopia and North African and the sahel. Negroes are native to ALL of Africa.they were their first before berbers migrated in and carved out their own space. Albiet with some a mixing too.
The word moor only means black man bruh anybody who is black is a moor At the time a lot of the Arabs were much darker in complexion. At that time before they started to have children with Caucasian female prostitutes lighting the complexion of a large percentage of their race. Still All black people were considered moors. The word Moor was synonymous with negro or dark skinned.
Not just Moors from Africa. Remember that local population also converted to Islam, and Africans did intermarry with local Europeans. So Al Andalus is a mixture and joint project of Arabs, Berbers, Goths, Hispano Romans, as well as Europeans from the north. Since Al Andalus did have slaves of European origin.
When did people in Iberia ever call themselves "Hispano"? But the people of Iberia do use the word "Moro" and have a very famous phrase: Hay Moros en la costa
they are modern painting, look and medieval spanish catholic painting, moor are not black negro/sub-saharan african hunter-gather with no writing script and speak bantu and niger-congo langauge, they are arab and berber people, and also native Iberian muslim. they speak arabic, writen in arabic, and mozarabic(latin writen in arabic script). they are not black negro, afrocentric love to steal others people credit and civilzation, same with ancient egypt, olmec and ever khmer/cambodian who build angkor wat.
Most of them Sicilians have Black dna, you just have to look at the Tate brothers who both could pass as Southern Italians to see where the Sicilians come from.
@@Meirstein 25 years..wtf? 😂...Sicily for example was under Islam for a grand total of 700 years apparently..not 700 years strait though I'm pretty sure. Sicily & Malta had basically the same history except Malta stayed more Arabic.
The blacks were hired warriors by Berbers Sultans ! They had nothing to do with all the achievements and intellectual advancements outside of what skills they provided in war.
@@adamqa1Really? How do you know that? So the blacks had nothing to do with the achievements? On what do you base your assumption ? I'm not black by the way.
@@adamqa1Not true. Africans taught Eurasians everything. Series DNA show the potential for Genius. The higher the number the greater the potential for Genius. Ex. Monkies DNA series is 5, Eurasians DNA series is 6 and some Melanated Africans And DIASPORA MELANATED AFRICANS IN AMERICA IS 9. This study was done by a Eurasian on a copyright research paper that's hidden and hard to access.😮
Oxford was modelled on the Univ of Paris and Theology and Law were 2 of the main subjects...Neither of which would have any reference to the Moors, theologically because the Moors were muslims and their laws were Quranic..
The Moors were basically a mix of Arab and Berber and only conquered the Spanish peninsular. As modern Spaniards have hardly any sub Saharan African in their DNA its bogus to infer as suggested here that black Africans developed or influenced Europe during this historic phase.
If you were as smart as you think you are you would know the word Berber means “non greek” or “foreigner” Berber isn’t a race. Berber ppl is simply anybody that isn’t from Greece …
@@davidmoftyou can't jus yell curse words and be right...berber cones from barbarians which is what Roman's called north Africans as well as all none Greeks and Romans...there is more than one berber tribe...the Amaiziah and the Tureg the most famous.
@ExLucifer-i3h Doing just what Lucifer does… stirring up trouble (where there is none)… lying… and tryna provoke anger. We see you Luciferrrrrr! 👀🤣😂😂 Perfect name btw…👌🏽
@@geki1344 Nope, the original Muslims were from Saudi Arabia. But the moors were actually the Amazigh, which are actually considered as tribes and not INDIGENOUS in modern Morocco.
the Moors were NOT black SubSaharan africans, they were mostly BERBER; they came from Morroco, Lybia, Tunisia, Algeria....but they had THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of Sub Saharan SLAVES.....SECOND; the Moors DID NOT bring ANYTHING significant to the Iberian Peninsula, especially "Mathematics" and "Astronomy"....what they did bring was SLAVERY....DECAPITATIONS...CASTRATIONS....MISERY...OPRESSION....just like they do TODAY in their own Countries....the MOORS were NOT Sub Saharan africans, STOP playing stupid games and get REAL !!
@@selmaferdjioui5873 ....they were SLAVES !....in REAL LIFE, the Arabs and Muslims ENSLAVED....CASTRATED....DECAPITATED....EXPLORED black africans for THOUSANDS of years before any European set foot in Sub Sahara africa....some 15 MILLION of them to be exact for the duration of 1600 YEARS straight....History is a BITCH, hum?
No one ever mentions the fact that there were Black Africans living in Europe who were Catholics under the Visigoths. Before Mohammedanism (There was no Quran yet that is why you never see one with the Moors) the North African Coast was dotted with Catholic Monasteries with Black African Monks. The Moors may have had alot of help already in Spain when they arrived.
@@harmanthind2147 Unfortunately you failed to bury the History and replace it with Fantasy. Also all of the Greek and Roman statues were reproductions made during the renaissance which makes them basically FAKE because the Greeks and Romans used to PAINT all of their sculptures yet yours are just White. Another FAIL. You Stay getting caught.
@@harmanthind2147 the fantasy is that after 1000 years of no advancement, europeans just magically exploded with technology and knowledge and spread it around the world, but only after the blks all "disappeared"
المور هم سكان موريطانيا الطنجية أو ما يسمى الآن المغرب و هم أمازيغ و لا علاقة لهم بسكان إفريقيا جنوب الصحراء. بعد دخول المور لإسبانيا تكونت بعد دلك إمبراطوريات كالمرابطين و الموحدين و المرينيين و السعديين في المغرب و إنظم لها سكان من الصحراء الكبرى كالطوارق و قليل من العرب القادمين من تونس الحالية فأصبح إسم المور يطلق على جميع هذه الإثنيات.
@@alpharius_nox لو ركزتم على تاريخكم كنتم ستجدون حظارات و ثقافات مثل مملكة سنغو و غيرها كانت ستغنيكم عن هذا الكذب السخيف و محاولة السطو الصبيانية على الحضارات الأخرى مثل الحظارة المورية الأمازيغية و الحظارة الفرعونية هههه. التاريخ مكتوب و الكل يعرفه و لن تغيره بفيديو بليد كله أكاذيب أو تعليق مستفز. تحياتي.
@@hamidalhaiane6536 So explain to me why prior to the 20th Century, every mention of Moors, and every depiction of Moors in European sources, was of a society of Arabs and black Africans? For 500 years, the Europeans got it wrong?
Amazing you’re finally admitting this factor of these known factors. The African people need to know that too the whole world need to know it need to be in the history books so they can study and learn the right way.
Nearly 800 years of Moorish rule did more than just imprint ideas into and onto Spain. Moors mixed their DNA with Iberians during that time and that remains as much as the ideas do.
@imperialstrategies6065 The Romans invaded and ruled Britain for over 300 years. The Anglo-Saxons invaded and ruled them for 600 years. They were also ruled for 100 years by the Vikings ... they know about, and have experienced, mixing many times. The Moors did have contact with the British Isles and even had settlements in Scotland and England, which is probably why certain flat plains in those areas are called "moors", because those were the areas where the African Moors settled/inhabited.
They also brought fashion to To the culture. The Moors loved fashion they help Europe expand fashion because they one wore one garment the whole year long. It should be movies made about them but we know how Hollywood operates and who controls it.
@SteelerzReignSupremeII and u can literally go see the paintings of the moors and u will see most of them were white, with only some black people, there were more ginger moors then black moors
@@1MarkKeller the moors never had settlements in England, and u have no idea what a moor is, the moors didnt even exhisted, thats what we portuguese and spanish called europeans who converted to islam, so only europeans could be moors, the north africans were called berbers, callin them moors is the most retarded thing ever, Marinid Dynasty, Almoravids, Almohavids, those were their names, so please dont talk about stuff u dont know, also north africans have more iberian blood then iberians have north african blood, in case u dont know it was Portugal who ruled Marroco after this
@@rogernewsomejr4634 lmao, u know that the moors adopted the typical iberian dressing style right? they literally started to use black and yellow "ponchos", wich was the traditional iberain wearing, before that the moors literally all used a "jubba thobe" wich is the same thing muslims wear today and nobody in iberia uses that, so that is just absolutely bullshi, i dont even know where u got that from but id like u to tell me ur sources pls
@@morosultanate692 they were dark theirs no such thing as”too dark” black people come in all shades it can b darkskin brownskin or lightskin we have all skin tones were dark chocolate to white chocolate
@@huncxo8566 so am i black? Im North African native, the best way i could describe my skin tone would be lightskin and even then they said i wasn’t black, so what am i?
The Moors were Arabs and Berbers having nothing to do with Blacks . Andalusia had an arabic culture known through its great poets like Abu Newas and its great scholars like Ibn Sinna , Ibn Roshd ,...writing in perfect arabic. Their works never mentioned Blacks. When the Moors fled to North Africa, they settled in old North African cities such as Fes, Tlemcen , Algiers , Tunis ...where their descendants still live today, they are known for their fair skin not showing the smallest hint of blackness.
moors were black african from the songhai empire, masamuta force convert his empire to muslim and utilize the arab language, its a religious conversion not conquest, thats what gave the arabs access to west africa and spain, there were no berber civilation, you were nomads , no library no mathematics, thats mali empire and songhai empire, the berbers were nomads traiters queen elizabeth 1 gave the berbers ships of gun powder and guns and the berbers attack the songhai empire destroyed it burn timbuc tu thats how the songhai empire fell if the berebrs were civilize you would still be civilize you were mercinaries with no history the songhai empire included mauritania and south algeria, stop your bullshit there is no berber civilization its black west african mali empire, songhai empire where books and knowledge was more valuable that money up to this day you berbers arabs still attacking black african you were never any civilization, you couldnt develop spain you were mercinaries then you are now
Moor Etymology = "From Mauritania" Arab has nothing to do with race, but go ahead and research the first Arabs. They look they were they look today due to the Barbary slave trade when Arabs bought so many White women that it changed the region within 200 years.
@@1SUPR3M3 lies you wouldnt attack and enslave the black population , mauritania still practice shattle slavery songhai empire didnt practice it, the arabs still do, they need to be freed
While north Africa is indeed on the African continent, is it accurate to call it African? Or is it more accurate to call it Mediterranean? I think its the case as mentioned below that the peoples and cultures of the Mediterranean basin have been in a multi millennial cultural and genetic exchange. The Anglo sphere’s ignorance of Africa as a monoethnic and genetic state represented by the peoples of West Africa is frankly bizarre and inexcusable.
Yes it’s more accurate to call it African. Like you just said it’s on THE CONTINENT OF AFRICA 🤷🏾♂️. Let me ask are you one of those people that call Egypt the Middle East???
@@clintonpeabody4833 Interesting point. Do Canadians consider themselves Americans. Do Mexicans consider themselves Americans. Or for that matter, do Hondurans, Chileans, Argentines, Brazilians consider themselves Americans. I don’t know the answer to that question. I don’;t know that peoples consider their continental identity first. But again, I don’t know. My initial question is based on cultural and genetics forged by 1000s of years of trade and history. But again, just a question.
Given that the greatest developements in Europe happened after the Moors were kicked out, and not even in the parts of Europe where most advances took place, it takes some mental gymnastics to think they developed it.
Europe has done way more destruction than great developments. Look at all the trash in the air and in the sea as a result of European “development”. Yeah, right… Don’t get me started on y’all.
Moro > Moreno > Black Man Mora > Morena > Black Woman Blackberry in Spanish = Mora If a North African person with stereotypical Arab facial features were to go to Spain and not tell anyone that he or she is from North Africa, most people would assume that person is a Middle Eastern. If a Black person goes to Spain, most likely the people there are going to call that person a Moreno or Morena.
No it's not! The Umayyad occupation of the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) was made by the Umayyad Caliphate (Arabs) that conquered all Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and North Africa in 7th Century. And then occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) from 8th to 13th Century in Portugal (1249). From 8th to 15th Century in Spain (1492). In terms of Kingdoms it was the Umayyad Caliphate, Fatimids, Almoravids, Almohads and Nasrids. In other words thousands of Arabs, Amazighs and also thousands of Persians and Syrians that the Ummayad Caliphate brought from Mesopotamia and Levante to North Africa. Amazighs (Berber) armies were used by everyone in North Africa. Phoenicians used them. Romans used them. Arabs used them. Pretending that all the Knowledge that Arabs brought to Iberian Peninsula didn't came from Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and Egypt is just being biased. In the end of the day the influences left in the Iberian Peninsula are Arabic. The algebra that we use is Indian-Arabic. Our languages (Portuguese and Spanish) have hundreds of Arabic words adaptions. And Nautical Science, Navigation, Astrolabe, Sextant none of that came from Africa. Iberians were sea people at least since presence of Phoenicians in 1100BC. Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) spread all around the Mediterranean Sea coming from Lebanon, Syria where they emerged in 3000BC. The fact that they used berber cavalry in the Maghreb 'cause they set the Capital of their Carthaginian Empire in Carthage, Tunisia built in 900BC, doesn't make them African. Portugal was born in 1143 (12th Century) and defeated the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers)) in 1249 (13th Century). That's before Mansa Musas's Mali "Empire" that only florished under the control of the Islamic World and as vassals of the Sultans of Mecca. Portuguese Navy, Nautical Science, Navigation, Boat construction is the result of several Schools the Kingdom implemented bringing Specialist from all the World. In 1415 Portugal started the Age of Discovery by conquering Ceuta (Muslim Moors City in North Africa) and started sailing to get to India around Africa in 1419. And did it with boats and skills that changed World's Nautical History forever. In 1500 Portuguese were already the first Global Empire of the World with territories in all Continents. From China to Brasil. What Portuguese found in Southern Regions of Africa were primitive tribes not even comparable to Egypt that by that time was already quite primitive when compared to European Empires! Stop propagating lies you're embarassing yourselves (Americans) and real Africans! Best Regards from Portugal, American Kangz! ❤🇯🇵🇨🇳🇲🇾🇮🇳🇪🇹🇲🇿🇦🇴🇬🇼🇸🇹🇨🇻🇲🇦🇵🇹🇧🇷🇨🇦
@@ericedwards1301no , North Africa has never been black , if it were the Blacks would be the majority today which is not the case. All of Africa was colonized by foreigners and wherever Blacks were a majority they still are.
The moors are the Amazigh people, the indigenous people of North Africa, we have our own gene pool. We ,the North African are NOT from Sub Sahara Africa. During Almohad and Almoravid dynasty, the Moors used the sub Saharan African to fight in Al Andalouse . Read the history before spreading wrong false history. Stop stealing other people's heritage. Ancient Egyptians, the Moors and the Carthaginian are North African. Moors are Moroccan of today, ancient Egyptians are the Egyptians of today, Carthaginian are the Tunisian of today. STOP SPREADING FALSE HISTORY.
Spain was muslim for 7 centuries, if you think that the moors of Spain were black, spain would look like colombia now 😂😂😂😂, but modern portuguese and Spanish share lot of similarities in look with north african amazigh and Arabs. I'm Moroccan and lot of families in Morocco they still have their ancestors houses keys in Spain after they were kicked out.
There were hardly any White people in Columbia compared to Indigenous and African. In parts of Iberia, people are very dark and have a high percentage of both Moorish and later African DNA. Depending on the social structure, it is quite possible to have a segregated population based on religion and caste. Which is pretty much what happened, at least after the formation of Spain and the banishment of the Moors and Jews. That said, I don't think the Moors were primarily "Black" as we consider it today.
@@GrahamNickerson I'm Moroccan, we still have the clothing traditions, the architecture, the knowledge, the music andalou Arab, medieval spain it's not hard to document, I can list all the muslim dynasties that ruled with names of governors starting from the omayades that has Damascus as capital then the abbaside then almoravide and alomoahade to independent Emirates in andalous, names of scientists : ibn rushed, ibn sina, ibn haitem, ibn tofail, khawarizmi....., all these are brown or white, majority. Of course Arabs and Amazigh used black in army but it's like France used senegalese in WW2.
@@easterworshipper730 majority not black, majority arabophones and majority of amazigh tribes and look up the amazigh in the pyrmaids they were never described as black people and look up Libyan pharaoh who was from a libyan amazigh tribe and he was never black...man these people are literally stealing our history and heritage in the most ridiculous ways ever, they don't even know how to lie bro, it's so stupid and embarrassing...Mauritania is an old amazigh kingdom that existed along with Numidia and Africa after the fall of Carthage and amazigh tribes are majority non blacks and the skin gets darker as you go south reaching the sahel desert like Tuareg and some modern Mauritanian tribes. it's like claiming that african americans are the indigenous people of america using the history of slaves in america as an evidence of existence...
The way you know the moors were black is because everytime they are mentioned in European writings they are almost always referring to someone black. There are very little European writings that describe an Arab as a Moor
@@cedricroney1475 “Moor” is an exonym used by Iberian Christians to refer to Iberian Muslims. They were people of Arab, Berber and Iberian origin. They were not black.
An expensive, but sure way to figure out who the Moors are ethnically, is to go visit Morocco or other countries in Northwest Africa. There are some minor differences between early Moors and current north Africa, but their ethnic composition remains largely intact. Two insights will occur: 1) You'll come to realize the word "Africa" isn't always a "black" place. 2) You'll come to realize the overwhelming majority of North Africans are caucasiod Berbers. The closest ethnic relations to North Africa is the eastern Mediterranean and Southern Europe.
Yep. It's just that sub-Saharan Africans love the idea that they 'black people' ruled over Europe at one time. Spoiler, they didn't. There were some black soldiers and slaves, but the Moors were primarily Arabs, Berbers and European Muslims. There is a new rewriting of history by black people where they basically ruled everything, invented everything and were everything. AI is making it even worse, because now they can generate fake AI photos depicting themselves as kings and so on, and people are unfortunately stupid enough to believe it.
Unfortunately those amazigh berbers, dont represent the natives, they are not even related anymore. they have more ashkenzai blood then they have north african dna. The morroccan government found a very old mummy in the desert and youll be shocked to see that the real inhabits looked like. Basically like the Twa/Batwa people. The berbers were targeted by islam for their pagan religion, today they embrace the islam.
So we should ignore all contemporary descriptions, all contemporary illustrations of the Moors by people who saw them, and how Moors described themselves, and we should just look at the modern population? Sounds very logical, Pffk.
@@alpharius_nox Mmodern genetics is empirical in nature, and history is more subjective as well. Genetics give us a clear understanding, on a mass statistical scale, of various ethnicities. We can identify genetic material in individuals from Arabia VS Israel VS Sudan Vs Congo VS Spaiin, etc. Of course there are people that exhibit multiple concentrations (i.e. mixed genetics), but we can still discern the various strains of genetics, even in those mixed individuals. Further, we can determine chronology of genetic material based on it's placement in sequencing, in analogy like a skyscraper (whose earliest constructions are closer to the ground). What is empirically seen in Berber countries is a majority of earliest genetics that is NOT the same as later West African, Arabic, or Southern European genetic migrants. This is the native Berber ethnicity that is the oldest in the gene code - uniquely found in this area of North Africa in the highest degree. It's is closest related to the Iberian genome (i.e. early native spaniards share the most similarities with these native berbers, and other peoples, such as subsaharans, are much less related, and when subsaharan DNA is detected in Berber individuals, it is most commonly a small amount that is chronologically at a later date in history, so not the native population at all). This genetic analysis also has a very important aspect to it - it shows that ethnicities, including the Berbers, rarely undergo a deep transition into a "melting pot" over the centuries - that is a false and racist postmodern narrative. Even within a "diverse society", we can still genetically determine who a majority group is, and who came when. History, in this context, is merely a secondary verification of genetics.
@@514Exc Did you flag my first comment to you, because it's not here anymore. Are you one of those fabled "we waz kangz" sophists? It's racist to blackwash African history. There could be dozens of mummies that bear genetic similarities to subsaharans, and that doesn't represent the actual parent ethnicity of most mummies or genetic analysis (or historical accounts). There's always been travelers from nearby countries in history, as well as a minority of relocating migrants, so that doesn't make genetics and history some subjective pot where we can trick people into historical revisionism. Further, let's see those sources for this outlying "black mummy". You are completely lying, in an anti-semetic tone, about ashkenazi DNA amongst Berbers. This same faulty reasoning about outlying mummies is used for Upper Egypt as well. The genetics don't lie. Even places like Spain, which was also a target for muslims, only bears a statistical minority of shared Arabic or Berber DNA, typically only seen in small portions in the deep south. In the central and North of Spain, that minor foreign DNA becomes even statistically smaller, oftentimes nonexistent.
The moors most definitely " civilized" Europe, the Moors were civilized by the Muslim Arabic people. The Arabic people enlighted and civilized the world.
North Africa and Spain have been long part of an european empire, the roman empire. During that time many european lived in Africa long before Arabs. Alger (Iconium) has been founded by Romans for example. Morocco and Spain were even part of the same roman district, the "diocesis Hispaniorum". After the fall of the roman empire, western Europe and north Africa has been invaded by germanic people such as Goths in Spain, Franks in Gaul and Vandals in Africa. Despite the fall of the empire, links have never really been broken between north Africa and Europe. They all shared the same christian religion and continued to have trade. In the 6th century north Africa was taken back by the eastern roman empire which controled Syria, Egypt and Palestine too. Then came Islam wich led to a profound ceasura between the islamic and the christian part of the mediterranean world. So North Africa had always had more relationship with Europe than with subsaharan Africa separated by a huge desert that was much more difficult to cross than the mediterranean sea. Africans doesnt mean black. Africa is a roman name, they gave it to Tunisia after they have invaded it and it was inhabited by phoenicians (Carthag) who came from Middle East. So first people named Africans in history were not black. Moors, like Numids were not black. Most of berbers are not black, they even have lighter skin than Arabs. It is true that you also have some black berbers but they live in the southern parts of North Africa like Mauritania. So, it has been during a very short period that some black muslims dominated Spain : the Almoravid dynasty which originated from Mauritania and lasted 50 years before being overthrowed by Almohad who were Arabs.
If there were no Blacks in Northern Africa how did Germany at one point before the genocide of Nazis had dark skinned Germans pictures of the Moors have pigments of black
Exactly! "Mouros" for us Portuguese or "Maurus/Mauri" for Roman/Italians didn't refer to the same people necessarily. That's a vague term. For Romans Maurus/Mauri were the Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) and their Amazigh (Berber) armies. For Portuguese and Spanish Mouros were the Umayyad Caliphate, Almoravids, Almohads, Nasrids that occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) in 8th-13th Century in Portugal and 8th-15th Century in Spain. In other words Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers). Portuguese culture since Medieval Times was influenced by a lot of people Celts, Visigoths, Romans, Phoenicians and also Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians, Amazighs). As was South Italy for example since the Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) 'cause they had territories/ports/cities all around the Mediterranean Sea since 1100BC. From their original Cities in Levante (Lebanon, Syria), to Egypt, Lybia, Tunisia where they built Carthage in 900BC (conquered by Romans in 146BC), Argelia, Morocco, South Iberian Peninsula, Malta, South Italy, South Greece. Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) used Amazigh (Berber) cavalry. So did Romans in their North African Provinces in Mauretanea (Morocco and Argelia). Not to be confused with nowadays Mauritania, the the Country. For us Portugal (Born in 1143) the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians, Amazighs) occupation only took 106 years till 1249, when the last Sultan of Algarve was defeated.
African had never been of any European rather invasion to steal. There was never any European religion in Africa before Andalus Islamic development which Europe carry herself high
Simple answer,...No. AN African Moor was a minority, as most were Arabian/Syrian in nature. Africans were very rarely seen in Europe before the beginnings of the slave trade. Historically, north Africa was not black. They were far paler in nature. Arabs are not black.
@@karlshaner2453 carbon - testing from the walls. See this is the problem with people like you , you’ve been falsely indoctrinated with misinformation for a long time that it instantly makes you repulsive towards common facts , due to acting self-centred and thinking you can gate-keep others history
@@audiovideando1592that’s literally what this video is about. There’s other countless videos on CZcams about the moors. How is this racist? This is history.
@@thirsty57 The "black" moors? Don't you think that's ignorant and racist? The best known moors nowadays are Zinadine Zidane and Karim Benzema. How black are they? This is the same bullshit as: the ancient Egyptians were black, the Jews were black, Jesus was black. All in the same false and stupid direction.
The Umayyad caliphate, whose ruling class were Arabs from Syria got Europe out of dark ages. 😂😂😂😂😂 Why do blacks want to take credit for what Arabs and morrocans did??
No,the first moors were africans,the word at first was used to speak about muslims from Africa,the first moors in Europe were africans,later the word was used to speak about any muslim.
The blacks were hired warriors! They had nothing to do with all the achievements and intellectual advancements outside of what skills they provided in war.
What ppl fail to understand is that Africa is extremely diverse gemetically...Ethiopians and somalians, and Nubians were and are closer related to Europeans than to West Africans/Bantu
I wouldn't say closer related, because West and East Africa are still Black people from the line of Ham. I would also argue that the only Europeans that are closely related to East Africans are the Greeks and the Romans, and then obviously the inter-mixing of the Arabs. Most Northern Europeans have Neanderthal dna, which majority of these Black African people do not have.
Did the African Moors develop Europe? Depends on what encompassed Europe at the time. And it depends on what you think 'Moors' are. moors simply means Muslim. Moors were not necessarily Sub Saharan Black. In the north of Africa is Egypt, Tunis, Libya and Morocco who are not black. There were Moors in Malta and Sardinia etc and they are not sub Saharan black.
sorry to inform you but the original songhai empire language where the moors originated from was not arabic, mansamuta on his trip to arabia force convert his empire to muslim and adopted the arabic language we still have the original songhai empire language and direct proof they translated it to arabic it was a religious conquest not military also the mali empire, and the songhai empire where knowlwdge was more valuable that money, thats not arabic or mercinary nomad berbers who destroyed the songhai empire, by queen elizabeth the 1 gave them ships of gun powder and guns and they attack the songhai empire burn timbuctu and end african renaisan it you were anything that tradition would have continuted, its beacause it was never you but the black african of the mali and songhai empire and their adaption of islam contributed to the slow deprogress of the empire
first of all the word black was invented by a racist caucasian man we are not black secondly word white was also invented if you tell me you look white then u must be sick in the head also moors are darkskin people not black actually
@@sulner9997You can't defend lies. Moors is what European Christians called black people, do a simple research, it's everywhere. The people in North Africa today are simply the descendants of invaders. That land doesn't belong to them just as Palestinian land doesn't belong to so called Jews people in Israel today. Stop lying to yourselves, the truth remains the truth
@@sulner9997 The moors didn't originate from songhai, that's idiotic nonsense. In actual fact the Sahel was ruled by Berbers (whites) who came from North Africa. They introduced civilization and islam and ruled the primitive blacks who had no civilization of their own.
@@EmperorWewuzIII let me educate you the moors were not arabs or berbers the moors accepted arabs and berbers because of their muslim religion, thats why you claim them but the muslim arabs were black slavers women couldnt do maths or science, the moors were tolerant of jews their university linked back to timbuctu not north africa you had non when the mercinary berbers which is what you are got gun powder along with morroco and attack the songhai empire all of the golden age of africa stopped, most of the maths and science and enginering from the moors the navigation equiptment was built in timbuctu, if you were the moors and you attacked the songhai empire and destroyed it, your moor golden age should have continued, what took over was radical islam and piracy, timbucktu was the centewr of learning anf knowledge from the mali empire to ghana to songhai and the arabs and berbers of north africa didnt build anything close to it, when songhai fell the progress stopped whether you like it or not. because the moors were not a monolithic group you claim them but when timbucktu fell their was no more progress, why didnt you build some university up in algeria and morocco if you were the moors only one civilization didi that in that area and its timbucktu
the Moors ruled europe for more than 800 years ? (16.min45) okay, not so much, it was majority of hispania, there were other Large empires at the time, Al-Andalus was big, strong and important for sure but one of a number of such important Empires. After 500 years (750-1250) central Iberia was back in christian rulers, only in the south the Emirate of granada lasted 300 more years. Also, if history is so wrong and Black Folks were involved all over, where have Black people in europe been then ? I love the Black African Nations and Cultures, Mali, Nigeria, Kongo, I love the walls of Benin and the stories about it. Black History does not need White Charity. i wish you all a great day ! Did the Moors civilize Europe ? nope, the influenced of course in many good ways, but they were not the only nor the strongest influence at the time. whats happening here?
So it would be great if the Moors from Africa develop Africa now. It's high time they did that.Then they can spread that knowledge to all the other impoverished countries. Africa and India need the Moors badly in the 21st century. So come on Moors, where are you when you are needed ?
Moor was a derogatory term used by Christians to describe Muslims in Spain. Moor did NOT mean black African. There were black soldiers as mercenaries in Muslim armies who were called “ black moors “ but they were never part of any ruling elite or native population anywhere outside of subsaharan Africa and Sahel region. Also moors did not civilized Europe. This is totally a LIE. In fact Europe was gradually recovering itself after 8-9th century and Islamic invasion of North Africa and Iberian peninsula stopped that progress
@@Mauri7782 west africans did take zimbabwe 1000 years before europeans came..and did develop trade routes to sell "meat " europeans did develop "the breadbasket" in less than 100 years ...what pattern do we recognize
@@dorianduka West Africans didn’t know the existence of wheel until 19th century when western civilization introduced it to them during colonial era. What’s your point?
The word Moreno literally comes from the word Moor, meaning dark or dark skinned, you people need to stop your racism corupting your ability to learn the truth.
Prior to the Arab conquest of North Africa, Jews lived all throughout the coast and also within the interiors of the Sudan & Western Africa. . The ethnic population of the Moorish Empire consisted of Arabs, Native African Berber Tribes & Jews. . There were also many Jews at this time who had adopted Islam within the coasts of Africa because of the Arab conquest Travels In Africa By Nahum Slouschz 1927 Page 365 However in 711AD, the conquest of Spain was again undertaken, this time by the Musselmans in concert WITH THE JEWS. The first one to set foot on the soil of Spain was General Tarif (“a Jew of the tribe of Simeon”), after whom the island of Tarifa, opposite Tangiers, was named. Another Israelite Berber chief, named Kaulan el Yehudi, followed the Arabs into Spain and, after the peninsula had been occupied by the Mussalmans, tried to raise a REBELLION AGAINST THEM. Among other Jews connected with the conquest of Spain were two sons of the Cahena, at the head of the army of Jerua.
When you say Jews be specific. Because these fake Ashkenazi Khazarian Jews will take credit for something they were not involved in. So when you say Jews pls define that you mean Arab Jews or Black Jews or both. But definitely not white Jews
Yes the moors picked up europa and brought civilization back to them ...thats why every secret society honors the Fez....most castles and cathedrals were created and built by moors....🙏🤚
@rogernewsomejr4634 🙏..the Koran, Torah, bagavagita...etc are science books ....these secret societies around the world can end many debates that plaques modern times but then power will be gone...sad..
@@BranMan10 haha 😂 the empire of Moroccans started from Morocco to Spain until Senegal no mali bro Mali was a kingdom back then and moors are Moroccans this is why Moroccans in Spain are called until now the moros which is moors in Spanish
I am from north Morocco and I got light skin dark hair .I did my DNA 99% north African ( Amazigh) In history also my great parent lived in Al Andalus . Like many Moroccan the percentage of Arab dna is less than 1% in Moroccan. We do have Arabic culture bc islam 🤍and north African culture 🤍bc we r the native people of north of Africa . Morocco got oldest sapien skull means all humans are all Moroccan. And we are diverse in how we look like . We admire all races and all cultures .Moroccan got mixte little with Iberian at Al Andalus time . Moroccan got also mixte with our brother from sub sahar african countries ( dark skin) . Moroccan are proud to be African and Amazigh and Arab ( culture ). Some Arab came to North Africa and brought islam but got married to Amazigh berber women so the Arab dna is very little in North of Africa . Dna studies prove it . We still admire Arabic culture bc the believes but we r not Arab
Amazighs are mixed at least since Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) that came from Levante (Lebanon, Syria) and Roman Era. That just is incorporated in a North African label. I'm from Algarve, Portugal. We're not different visually. Cristiano Ronaldo and Gonçalo Ramos are also Moorish-Portuguese as i am. Best Regards from Portugal. 🇵🇹❤🇲🇦
we know history and more of the truth is coming out when the berbers with help from queen elizabeth 1 attack the songhai empire and burn timbuctu african progress stopped timbuctu was the place of all the knowledge not nomads berbers or arabs, you should familarize yourself with theThe Songhai Empire at its zenith extended over the current territories of Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Mauritania, Senegal, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Gambia, Burkina Faso southern algeria all the sahel if you knew that there was no berber civilization they just used you to destroy the songhai empire and all those progress stoppped, you didnt continued it
It's critical to understand Hamilcar Barca the father of Hannibal Barca Is the founder of the city Barcelona. We have a book called The Royal African War Elephant and it is the first of its kind containing the sources of documents and images of the African use of the war elephant in sub-Saharan africa. Available on all online markets. The Royal African war elephant
Interesting you say this, it is only sub-Saharan Africa or Black Africa that would use Elephants in war. If Hannibal was not fully Black, which I personally think he was, he was definitely part Black African, it has been stated that his father was full Black African, and his mother was a concubine slave of White European origin.
The Barcids founding Barcelona is an urban legend. Under the Ebro Treaty with Rome, Carthaginian influence in Iberia was confined to lands south of the Ebro River, while Barcelona is north of it. The main Spanish city of note that was founded by the Carthaginians is Cartagena (Qart Hadasht), which was founded by Hannibal's brother-in-law, Hasdrubal.
Africans were the original inhabitors of what is today called Europe, The Aryan speaking tribes migrated to this area. H.G. Wells "Outline of History" is a very good book concerning world history if you are really interested in the truth.
you do know that there are places in what old "european" dna is even today in majority and that people we speak about are identical to indo europeans in appearance and for you ..from south to north ....from Hofmeyer scull to nazlet khater..we have been even south of Sahara long before you have been made
"aryans" as in romani from india ? it is true that these aryans migrated to europe but if you mean blonde hair blue eyed, didn't they originate from the scandinavian countries ?
@@kwanchan6745 blonde hair originated in ANE populations of Siberia most close to ancestors of Amerindians around 16 000 years ago ,Afontova Gora is the oldest fossil ( ANE are ancestors of countless populations ..from old pre Indo European population of Europe,to Indo Europeans and Amerindians...) blue eyed comes from Indo Europeans ..either from east Europe or from Anatolia 10 000 years ago And for Indo Europeans ...in essence for Europeans that are Anatolians ..they have been around in Europe for almost 20 000 years but they did start with "aggressive " expansion around 6 000 years ago that did end their cousins like western hunter gatherers
@ServantofKemet interesting name ..why is oldest fossil in Egypt ...nazlet khater ...similar to fossils south of Egypt of that time a European (well ANE but for you.... people... that is the same ) ?
@CanaryKin and @siminho10 Both of you are dead wrong. The muslim empire was centered around al-andalus and only with its decline did the center move to north africa. The first attempt was made by the almoravids who came from mauritania. They were succeeded by the almohads who were ruled by a family from Nedroma, an algerian city. Neither the almoravids nor the almohads were indigenous to the entity now called morocco. Both chose capitals in that entity for geopolitical reasons. As for the ethnicity of the Moors, they were Berbers. They were mostly brown-skinned people. They were in fact neither black nor white as some have made them to be. The europeans, in both art and literature, painted them as blacks in opposition to white europeans. The muslim armies also included blacks who converted to Islam. Slavery was an integral part of the Muslim empire and this very fact undermines the thesis that the moors were black-skinned people. As I have shown in a nutshell, this is the complex reality that the proponents of the opposite theses are unable of grasping.
@@ajgraves8016 exactly, why would the european painters paint them all dark shades of brown, I need yt ppl to make it make sense. This is why europeans do not like yt americans they know they try to rewrite history and cannot handle people of color were civilized earlier before them. Keep in mind if Noah had 3 sons they all must have looked alike starting off....Ihe american yt (not the european) looks so different from other european ethnicities and refuse to believe africa started off dark ( i do not say black as it is a crayon color)....maybe americans yt are trying to tell us they did not come from any of noahs 3 sons and are instead a created race or maybe they come from ESAU and we all know yahweh hated esau. This would make sense why they aboriginals /natives of any country so much
This is not true! The Umayyad occupation of the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) was made by the Umayyad Caliphate (Arabs) that conquered all Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and North Africa in 7th Century. And then occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) from 8th to 13th Century in Portugal (1249). From 8th to 15th Century in Spain (1492). In terms of Kingdoms it was the Umayyad Caliphate, Fatimids, Almoravids, Almohads and Nasrids. In other words thousands of Arabs, Amazighs and also thousands of Persians and Syrians that the Ummayad Caliphate brought from Mesopotamia and Levante to North Africa. Amazighs (Berber) armies were used by everyone in North Africa. Phoenicians used them. Romans used them. Arabs used them. Pretending that all the Knowledge that Arabs brought to Iberian Peninsula didn't came from Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and Egypt is just being biased. In the end of the day the influences left in the Iberian Peninsula are Arabic. The algebra that we use is Indian-Arabic. Our languages (Portuguese and Spanish) have hundreds of Arabic words adaptions. And Nautical Science, Navigation, Astrolabe, Sextant none of that came from Africa. Iberians were sea people at least since presence of Phoenicians in 1100BC. Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) spread all around the Mediterranean Sea coming from Lebanon, Syria where they emerged in 3000BC. The fact that they used berber cavalry in the Maghreb 'cause they set the Capital of their Carthaginian Empire in Carthage, Tunisia built in 900BC, doesn't make them African. Portugal was born in 1143 (12th Century) and defeated the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers)) in 1249 (13th Century). That's before Mansa Musas's Mali "Empire" that only florished under the control of the Islamic World and as vassals of the Sultans of Mecca. Portuguese Navy, Nautical Science, Navigation, Boat construction is the result of several Schools the Kingdom implemented bringing Specialist from all the World. In 1415 Portugal started the Age of Discovery by conquering Ceuta (Muslim Moors City in North Africa) and started sailing to get to India around Africa in 1419. And did it with boats and skills that changed World's Nautical History forever. In 1500 Portuguese were already the first Global Empire of the World with territories in all Continents. From China to Brasil. What Portuguese found in Southern Regions of Africa were primitive tribes not even comparable to Egypt that by that time was already quite primitive when compared to European Empires! Stop propagating lies you're embarassing yourselves (Americans) and real Africans! Best Regards from Portugal, American Kangz! ❤🇯🇵🇨🇳🇲🇾🇹🇭🇹🇱🇱🇰🇮🇳🇪🇹🇲🇿🇦🇴🇬🇼🇸🇹🇨🇻🇵🇹🇧🇷
@@shinebright2898 Fragility is not knowing your own ancestors history. Research Asante (Ghana), Dahomey and Kingdom of Benin (Nowadays Benin and Nigeria), Kingdom of Kongo and Queen Nzinga (Angola). Those are the responsibles for capturing and trading your ancestors just like gold or ivory. You've got nothing to do with Amazighs from the Maghreb Region. We know our History so do our dear Moroccan neighbours. We don't accept Americans trying to re-write History with their Netflix and Hollywood Fairy Tales. Your history is 247 years old, American. Embrace it!
Before anyone refers to the Roman Empire as the main influence of civilising of the European continent, do not forget all the other empires that existed before the Roman Empire. In fact if you look back in history beyond the Roman Empire, you will discover that many of those that preceded the Roman Empire originated from the East and South of the Mediterranean. Prior to those earlier empires, Europe was considered lands populated by barbarians. In fact, the Romans, you could say, were civilised by these earlier empire builders, and could only continue to spread the knowledge they learned from these earlier conquerors. I think it would be more realistic for us to admit to the fact that our collective knowledge has always been built on older knowledge throughout history and from peoples who came before us from other civilisations that were more advanced than ours at an earlier time.
Europe wasn't civilized by anyone, it developed its own civilizations. Greece and Rome were the most advanced civilizations of their time. Europeans already conquered half the known world with the Indo-European expansions in the Bronze Age, then they did it again with the Greeks and Romans, then they did it again in the modern era.
I stand corrected, as not all Europeans were considered barbarians by the ancients, mostly the Western and Northern Europeans. No doubt, the Romans acquired much of the learned knowledge from the Greeks and possibly also the Anatolians and made much further advancements and refinements. But let's not forget the Romans were not in existence when the Greeks were at their zenith, and were considered not much more than barbarians. The Greeks, in turn, were only able to develop their civilization on the backs of the Egyptians and Mesopotamians. Which if you well know, are not considered parts of Europe. And I'm sure, despite the little that is known today, for sure, where the Egyptians and Mesopotamians piggybacked their learning from, to think any civilization could actually magically become civilised without the help of earlier peoples is nothing short of naivete. Let me go a step further by pointing out that if it was not for the conquest and occupation of the Iberian Peninsula by the Umayyad Empire, Greek philosophy, mathematics and even medicine would have been lost forever because of the fall of Rome Empire and the ensuing dark ages. Just as no man is an island, so neither is any collective of people able to advance on their own steam alone.
@@hanifmartin7505 actually guys you know nothing about this empire but some of it people from the sub saharian were black , are you know how this empire burn ? In which place ? Whats it religion? …
Don't you consider people with even 2% black genes to be black? What's the problem now? Your just so mad that a darker group of people were able to do this. They were black! Accept the truth, they helped to build European society up, and the grudge in you try to tear theirs down. Only missing a horn and a tail, Devils!
mulattos are derivatives of the black race. just because they dont look like chris brown doesnt mean they dont come from the black race because there were variations of "black" before the mixing began to create subraces. i.e hispanics, north africans, arabs, etc. these black races mixed with neanderthal/denisovan women to create you.
first of all, read this the first, who mentioned the name of Maur the maur is recorded as the native name by Strabo in the early 1st century The Moors were also mentioned by Tacitus as having revolted against the Roman Empire in 24 Ad. the word "Moor" traced back to the Phoenician term Mahurin meaning "Westerners". and the name of the country now is Morocco meaning is the west too,The word "Moor" is of Phoenician origin. It's not Greek origin at all.the moor is an ethnic who lived in the actual place Morocco.our first knowing king is Baga 250bc to the great one bocchus the first.their land was ,from tingis in the north to do Essaouira city in the south and from Mulucha river in the est to anfa in west.and the capital was betwin Volubilis and tamuda and chala/and then bocchus the first took the half Nomidane land after the fall of Jugurtha. we are not black we are not white we are not arab we are not philippine we are the moor with brun skin or Olive color.....stope changing our history i know that France,Spain,greece,and more.... they did all the possible to hide our glory our nation. even France named a land far away from us mauritanian just To distract our history ,They are jealous from our history from our pure nation.arabs comes to our land 1000years ago but they will never be the moor the black people they came to our land in time of saadi dynaste and alawit dynaste as slaves and solgers but the will never be moor.sorry but this is the true history . the catty west world did you know that all the metologie of grrec comes from our land ,the king atlas is frome our holyland morocco [Atlas de Maurétanie],Hercules Fighting Antaeusin our land and the grave of antaeusin is in morocco too ,tinjis[the city] is the wife of antaeusin too the montans in morocco took the name from king Atlas de Maurétanie.........the west trie to hide our glory our history they even changed our name from the maur to amazigh, the france damned there are a lot of moroccan like me, they know thier glory we will protect our land our history our glory our ethnic.we will make books videos we will do everything to protect our moorish nation
The Moors enslaved the Mali, you forgot that part. Mansa Munsa spent all his money, told his mercenary army of Moors and North Africans, Egyptians and Persians, that he had another gold mine discovered, after a year of waiting, His Mercenary Army began grabing the people for Mansa Munsa's debts. This started the Mali slave trade.
No, the Moors did not enslave Mali. Mali is a West African country that was once part of the Mali Empire, a powerful and wealthy state that flourished from the 13th to the 16th century. The Mali Empire had trade and diplomatic relations with the Moors, who were mainly based in North Africa and Spain. The Moors did not conquer or enslave Mali, but they did influence its culture, religion and architecture.
@@eingoluq oh yes they did, the university of Timbuktu has 10 of thousands of scrolls and records of the enslavement. Mali had no army of it's own. Mansa Munsa tried but gave up and went with all mercenary.
@@constantinople777christens5 everybody enslaved people form everywhere else. But that doesn't mean the entire of Mali wad enslaved by the Moors. That is asinine. You're so full of shit you don't even know Mansa Musa was born into Islam already. The area was already converted to Islam. And it is illegal and haram to enslave another Muslim. In fact most of north Africa including Berber converted to Islam to prevent themselves from being enslaved. So wtf are you talking about? The moors and Mali fought a lot. But they didn't enslave the entire lot of them. Mali sold slaves local and forgeign including Berber slaves to the Moors. But to sit there and suggest they were enslaved by them means you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. One thing we do know is that after the reconquista the Barbary pirayes which included Black Africans, raided Europe and took white people as slaves. Some found their way to areas in and around Mali.
@@constantinople777christens5 Wait did you say Mali had no military of their own? now I know you pulling shit out of your arse... You, the ignorant dumb ass that you are just said, Mali, the country that was an Empire, that expanded and dominated Western Africa and held sway over large swats of territory, with the largest gold reserves in the world, who was so large that when they marched through Egypt with their king and damaged the Egyptian economy, had no army to protect him and his riches? You are either insane or a moron. The Mali empire army was famously large, and not to be trifled with. They even had names for their ranks of men. For instance, a Sangaran, was a commander with 10,000 men under him, while a Sere is a commander with 1,000. There were names for other sizes too. They even had terra cotta statues of their cavalry units. my god man you are a dumbass. 🤣🤣🤣
Please answer this. If The Mali Empire had no army how did they conquer so many other states? How did they defend their own independence for so many hundreds of years? With so much wealth someone would have long since invaded and taken control of the source of all that wealth.
@Wiserhuman1 Your comment shows that you have a superficial grasp of history and a proclivity to exaggerate the role that Morocco had played in al-Andalus and in North Africa. Morocco is the only country in North Africa where indigenous elites played a minor role in state-formation. Indeed, the Idrissids (Saudi Arabia), the Zirids (Algeria) the Almoravids (Mauritania-Western Sahara), the Almohads (the rulers were from Nedroma, Algeria), the Merinids/Wattasids (Algeria), had their origins outside of al-maghreb al-aqsa, the true name of Morocco. All history books attest to this fact (see my bibliography) and to the fact that al maghreb el aqsa played a minor role in the history of al-Andalus and in North Africa. I have emphasized this point in a previous commentary. I also provide a list of books that support this viewpoint. As I have underscored in a previous commentary, the non-moroccan dynasties of the Almoravids, of the Almohads and the Mernids had intervened in Al-Andalus at the time of the reconquista. They were unable to turn the tide of warfare in the Iberian Peninsula. These dynasties had built capitals in al maghreb el aqsa for strategic reasons: to be close to Spain in order to wage the Jihad, which was the raison d'être of these dynasties. It is disingeneous on your part to claim these dynasties which have conquered al maghreb el aqsa (and other territories in North Africa) as Moroccan ones. The Huns had conquered a huge territory in Eastern Europe. But none of the peoples inhabiting that territory has claimed the Huns as their own dynasties. In short, you are the product of the Makhzen's propaganda and its folie des grandeurs. "Greater Morocco" has existed only in Allal el Fassi's sick mind. I advise you to read the following books, they will help you free yourself from the Makhzen's propaganda: Pierre Guichard, Al Andalus, 711-1492: une histoire de l'espagne musulmane; André Clot, L'espagne musulmane, VIII-XVe siècle, Philip Conrad, Histoire de la reconquista; Pierre Guichard et Bruna Siravia, Les royaumes des taifas
The “Makhzen” propaganda.. are you serious dude? For some reason you seem to absolutely want to de-Moroccanize Morocco from its own history. This is an absurd, unrealistic goal and demonstrates how pointless it is to debate with a person like you. Let's talk about dynasties and their origins. The Almoravids were founded by Abdallah ibn Yasin, a Moroccan who was born in the Moroccan Western Sahara. Some historians suggest that he was born in the Moroccan Sousse. The Almohads were founded by Ibn Tumert who was born in the Moroccan High Atlas. The Merinids were founded by Abu Yahya Abu Bakr ibn Abi Yusuf who's birthplace is estimated to be in morocco due to the fact that he was from the Zenata tribe, more politically active in Morocco. The Wattasids were founded by Abu Abd Allah al-Shaykh Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Wattasi who was also from the zenata tribes .The Saadians were founded by Muhammad al-Mahdi al-Qaim who was born in Sousse. The Alawite dynasty was founded by Moulay Charif who was born in the Tafilalt region. Moroccans have always played a key role in the founding and development of each of these dynasties. To think otherwise is synonymous with total absurdity and profound irrationality. Morocco has always had an influential role in the Maghreb and has always been an important kingdom in the region. The Moroccans were renowned for their military strength, which is why the Ottomans decided to maintain good relations with Morocco at a time when the Turks were annexing the rest of the Maghreb. It's not the French who are going to teach us our Moroccan history. We do not depend on foreign historians to come and teach us what happened on our lands.
@@Wiserhuman1You are a lost cause, spinning tales about al maghreb al aqsa whose history was fashioned by foreigners. If you read the books I mentioned in my previous commentary (which I doubt you will do), everything you have said in your lame response to my commentary would have been for naught. Unlike you, I always make sure to rely on credible sources to buttress my arguments on every subject I analyze. I will not waste my time with you anymore since you proved to me once again that you are a lost cause.
Thanks some Light skinned North Africans are trying to revise history by spewing lies about Moors not being of South Saharan Africans are there not Black Libyans Moroccans and Mauritanians
@@nisigate There is nothing negro about historic Berbers or Moors. They are a Northwest African desert coastal people. When black racists with an agenda cherry pick images of Moors, they will always choose the image of a Moor/sub-Saharan negro bastard offspring from the slave trade days. It’s unfortunate, but desperate people will hijack other cultures and claim it as their own. No caucasians or asians ever claimed to be Greek, Babylonian, Egyptian, or Berber.
Stop pohtoshoping images!! MOORS ARE NOT BLACK!! Yes they are Africans but not blacks the were the Berbers of north Morocco and they were absolutely not black
Any civilization is described through leadership not through soldiers and labours. Caliphates were exclusively Arabs and North Africans leaders only showed up when the civilization was dying. So not something to be so proud of😅
@babyboy562 uncivilised how? You realise the Greek and roman empire both far pre date the moors' rule over Spain and the also boast far more impressive contributions to Europe than the moors ever did. .
If the Moor's ruled for 700 years then it was Moor's that founded California & Florida were African that why California name after a black woman 😅 Just something to think about
Europe was already civilized hundreds of years earlier. The Roman Empire? The Greeks? Sure, the Moors invaded during the dark ages but there was still civilization in Europe at the time. The Byzantine Empire existed, for one. And the Moors only took over Spain, not all of Europe. I can concede that some advances may have spread over Europe from Moorish Spain, but overstating their influence this much is just crazy.
it was not overstated they brought ship building mathermatics university 17 university they made you what you were lionardo divenchi who you celebrate, a moor did a fix wing flight hundered of years before it work but didnt landed well the moors built europe it was the most significant development in histore just read your history where britain france traslate the more maths and scientific method to their language
@@sulner9997 You can barely spell, I don't trust a word you type. The Moors had a massive population and invaded a weal europe (ineffectively). Look at Africa today. They've still not built or innovated a damn thing. An embarrassment.
@@sulner9997 I think their influence is big but overstated. Renaissance didn't start from Spain where moors were mainly located and they didn't built Europe. Spain wasn't as influential as other european countries (where moors never ruled). Moreover, their rule wasn't always as peaceful and beneficial for native population of tha land they colonized.
@@alwa4735 oxford university was built from Spain through the Jews, also the french plus they translate their science books and rewritten it in their local language, the Renaissance couldn't happen in a vacuum you need a develop country to piggy back off and now we know it was moorish Spain, like the united states' rebuilt Europe Japan , Taiwan , south Korea
@@sulner9997 Oxford wasn't built from Spain. This doesn't make any sense. Why moors would build universities in a far away countries? Why reaissance didn't originate from Spain? United States borrowed money for some european countries after WWII and it wasn't done without their own interest in it. Some countries used those money in a better way and that's why there were different outcomes in creating successful economies. US can't take credit for achievments of Germany, Japan and the rest. You are right that renaissance could't happen in a vacuum. It started in Florence, Italy. There was an increased inerest in achievments and art od ancient Greece and Rome. Muslims, to their credit, copied and preserved knowlegde from many ancient manuscripts from those civilisations.
Already these are not Arabic numerals the real meaning but the FÉS numerals in reference to the oldest universities in the world where the origin of these numerals comes from. the Arabs simply erased them to make people believe that their origin is in the Middle East
I don’t understand what do moors in Spain and Portugal have to do with black Africans. There was never any black civilization anywhere outside of subsaharan Africa.
@@st3019 They had black slaves, that's about it. They often castrated the males and used the females as sex slaves. Now blacks idolize the people who enslaved, castrated and raped them.
Eventhough there's an argument that suggest Moors to be those of Mediterranean and Turkish Ottoman kelt, not in the slightest to be considered African, according to sources, Black Moors were said to be relatively wealthy decorated military commanders and highly sophisticated academics.
@@thedebunker1777 Btw, tere's no such thing as a Black Berber, It's either your Berber or of Moorish origin or you aren't, there really isn't no in between. It's no different for a modern day Egyptian claiming to be an "Ancient Egyptian", the logic on both instances are flawed eitherway.
Moors were not Black. Just because they came from Africa doesn't mean they were Black. They were Arabs who came to Europe through Algeria and Morocco. The Arabs conquered Algeria and Morocco then they went on to conquer the Iberian Peninsula. Learn some damn history.
Moors were NOT Sub Saharan Black as pictured in the video ad. They were arabic, Nor African, much like Egyptians. Some developments were made, certainly. But Northern Europe was highly developed in its own right.
@@andersonbin265why do y’all think there’s some invisible line in Africa that keeps dark skinned ppl below it? Mansa musa was a black African that was a moor. Also the richest man to ever live. You think with all the riches he had he never traveled to North Africa with his men? there’s no such thing as “sub Sahara” that was created by racist
It’s important to delve into history through reading, as images alone cannot provide a comprehensive understanding. It’s noteworthy that the Moroccan Sultans employed African soldiers in their armies. Some of these soldiers’ leaders were handsomely compensated by the Sultan, enjoying luxuries such as opulent houses, fine clothing, and companionship. However, their roles were confined to their military duties and they were not involved in the dynastic rule, the Moorish people in general, or the intellectual advancements of the time. These African individuals were hired warriors, their contributions primarily limited to their skills in warfare. Their lifestyle and compensation should not be misconstrued as having a broader influence on the achievements of the dynasties they served.
@@govinasimpson170 What they refer to as “black Moors” are "Abid Al Boukhari" or " The black guard of the Sultan", they are not ethnically Moors; they are African soldiers hired to fight for the Moors. Europeans who saw them on the battlefield with the real Moors called them “black Moors”. The Moorish movement in America originated from these African soldiers who went to america in slavery trades..
But what does this have to do with who the Moors were?, like I said, the people of Morocco back then, do not look like the Moroccans now, and Mansa Musa was the richest man in the World and has links to family members that were Moors in Spain, so are you saying that these Moroccan sultans had more power than the richest man in the World?.
@@treycampbell3533 It seems you have some issues with the historical timeline. Andalusia was conquered by the Arabs in 700. After them, it was the Moroccan dynasties of the Almoravids and Almohads who took over the governance of Andalusia in 1080, following the fall of the Umayyad Arabs. The Mali Empire and Mansa Musa, whom you mentioned, were in the 1300s, which is 600 years after the Arab conquest and 300 years after the Moorish conquest. Do you see that you do not have a good grasp of the subject? Please learn history from reliable sources, not from propaganda channels.
Europe will always denies that Moors bring civilization to Europe!
Because they didn't.
@@TTNL2442they did but they weren’t black they were like nowadays Moroccans
You guys can't cope, you're finally realising that your history is based on a lie, so you continue gaslighting. Look closely, some have negroid features. Cope. All the 3 Abrahamic religions are borrowed from black African religions. Go and do your homework.
@SteelerzReignSupremeII no. Only some factions from the army called abid Al Bukhari were black, and that’s recent. When Al Andalus existed there weren’t blacks in Morocco
@SteelerzReignSupremeIIMoroccans aren’t black
Moors were a conglomeration of Amazigh (Berbers), Arabs and South of the Sahara Africans such as Malinke, Soninke, Hausa and Fulani.
Souther Africans? The term sub saharan is a racist, inaccurate and revisionist term. The black people who were Moors came from.the Sahel and North Africa.
Based on the depictions or Moors in European artwork during their rule and afterwards, the Moors seem to be mostly made up of Black Africans.
And all wither from Ethiopia and North African and the sahel. Negroes are native to ALL of Africa.they were their first before berbers migrated in and carved out their own space. Albiet with some a mixing too.
*North African.
Moors and North Africans aren't black
The word moor only means black man bruh anybody who is black is a moor
At the time a lot of the Arabs were much darker in complexion. At that time before they started to have children with Caucasian female prostitutes lighting the complexion of a large percentage of their race.
Still All black people were considered moors. The word Moor was synonymous with negro or dark skinned.
@@Barak144 if this were the case, they would test positive for subsaharan dna. They don’t.
Don't they go Black face with red lips during the expulsion of the moors parade every year? The Spanish know who they were dealing with
Yes, a darker Arab people in comparison to the much lighter Spanish complexion.
Darker Moroccan white berber*
@@blackhawk7r221Oh, so now they are dark Arabs?? 😂😂😂😂😂 you can't make this shit up. Stop forcing yourselves to be what you will never be
@@blackhawk7r221lol yea ok
@@Ace-sb4il Research the parade before you respond.
Not just Moors from Africa. Remember that local population also converted to Islam, and Africans did intermarry with local Europeans. So Al Andalus is a mixture and joint project of Arabs, Berbers, Goths, Hispano Romans, as well as Europeans from the north. Since Al Andalus did have slaves of European origin.
Well told...
When did people in Iberia ever call themselves "Hispano"? But the people of Iberia do use the word "Moro" and have a very famous phrase: Hay Moros en la costa
Amazing...so Africans brought civilization to Europe and brought Europe out of the dark ages. Thanks for sharing history.
WE WUZ CIVILIZERS N SHEIT. LOL
@@easterworshipper730 sorry can’t understand your words.
@@CanaryKin yes you did.
@@easterworshipper730 sorry buddy. Can’t help you.
@@CanaryKin you cant help yourself, kang. LOL
WE WUZ MOORZ N SHEIT.
How many of you went into the islamic world as slaves ?
The paintings are gorgeous!
they are modern painting, look and medieval spanish catholic painting, moor are not black negro/sub-saharan african hunter-gather with no writing script and speak bantu and niger-congo langauge, they are arab and berber people, and also native Iberian muslim. they speak arabic, writen in arabic, and mozarabic(latin writen in arabic script). they are not black negro, afrocentric love to steal others people credit and civilzation, same with ancient egypt, olmec and ever khmer/cambodian who build angkor wat.
But they are fake pics . Most of them are imaginary pictures of 20th century. Not a single one of them is from Islamic Spain era .
Then Europe vanished them then went to Africa and enslaved them
it was africans who enslaved them, and sold them to europeans, asians, everybody.
why wasn’t southern Italy brought into this?
moor rule was there too
Most of them Sicilians have Black dna, you just have to look at the Tate brothers who both could pass as Southern Italians to see where the Sicilians come from.
Islamic rule in southern Italy lasted less than 25 years.
Still happened
@@kellenjohnson615 But it wasn't long enough to influence the area, unlike the centuries of Islamic rule in Iberia.
@@Meirstein 25 years..wtf? 😂...Sicily for example was under Islam for a grand total of 700 years apparently..not 700 years strait though I'm pretty sure. Sicily & Malta had basically the same history except Malta stayed more Arabic.
Black ppl are such giving ppl 😊
causian monkey we are not black we are dark skin people with different ethnicity and language and culture mf
They are Moroccan not black
The Moors were North Africans. Present day Morocco and Algeria. They were not black.
The word "Moor" means black and there are statues and artwork that shows the Moors as black. Lot of lies in the comments.
Nope it means Morocco none of that exist of them being black
@@the3zoooz1 liar
@@the3zoooz1people there now are invaders. They're not indigenous to Africa.
@@the3zoooz1 uhm in Spain I've seen so many black moors statues than the Arabs.🤔
Provide this proof of black statues in Spain. Lol
Oxford University and Cambridge University was founded by books and knowledge by the Moors of Spain.
True fact
The blacks were hired warriors by Berbers Sultans ! They had nothing to do with all the achievements and intellectual advancements outside of what skills they provided in war.
@@adamqa1Really? How do you know that? So the blacks had nothing to do with the achievements? On what do you base your assumption ? I'm not black by the way.
@@adamqa1Not true. Africans taught Eurasians everything. Series DNA show the potential for Genius. The higher the number the greater the potential for Genius. Ex. Monkies DNA series is 5, Eurasians DNA series is 6 and some Melanated Africans And DIASPORA MELANATED AFRICANS IN AMERICA IS 9. This study was done by a Eurasian on a copyright research paper that's hidden and hard to access.😮
Oxford was modelled on the Univ of Paris and Theology and Law were 2 of the main subjects...Neither of which would have any reference to the Moors, theologically because the Moors were muslims and their laws were Quranic..
@@michaelabbott9080 read the works of Bettany Hughes. Get over the 19th century colonial propaganda
The Moors were basically a mix of Arab and Berber and only conquered the Spanish peninsular. As modern Spaniards have hardly any sub Saharan African in their DNA its bogus to infer as suggested here that black Africans developed or influenced Europe during this historic phase.
If you were as smart as you think you are you would know the word Berber means “non greek” or “foreigner” Berber isn’t a race. Berber ppl is simply anybody that isn’t from Greece …
@@thirsty57 Its not my sayso the Berbers /Amazigh are recognised as the indigenous
ethnic group of North West Africa. And they are not black.
@@thirsty57what the fuck are you on ??? The bereber is one of the tribes present in north Africa 😂😂😂😂
Why is it bogus to believe when the Northern Europeans didn't even bath, and had no civilisation when the Moors was ruling Spain.
@@davidmoftyou can't jus yell curse words and be right...berber cones from barbarians which is what Roman's called north Africans as well as all none Greeks and Romans...there is more than one berber tribe...the Amaiziah and the Tureg the most famous.
The original people were Amazigh people. There are also many other tribes, Tebu, Tuareg, Mauri, Garamentes, etc. The phenotypes were various.
Yes, very diverse… first honest comment.
@ExLucifer-i3h Hi Lucifer! 😜
@ExLucifer-i3h Doing just what Lucifer does… stirring up trouble (where there is none)… lying… and tryna provoke anger. We see you Luciferrrrrr! 👀🤣😂😂 Perfect name btw…👌🏽
@ExLucifer-i3h “Lucifer” never admits to a lie, 🤥 so why get involved in circular arguments with a fool… plus I only take directives from TMH God.
Africa civilized Europe twice, from the Greeks and then again thru the Moors!
So European colonizers not ok, african colonizers ok?😂
the Greek were no black .
@@mansour9790yes
That's why Al-Andalus history is written in Arabic, because it's not Arab history but black history 😂😂😂😂😂
Exactly, but it all originated from Black Africa.
Sorry to say it, but there's lack of details in the Muslim conquest of Spain in this video. This is obviously biased.
Moors were literally the original Muslims? There are statutes of moors in Europe and they are all black. The pope even prays to a black woman
@@geki1344 Nope, the original Muslims were from Saudi Arabia. But the moors were actually the Amazigh, which are actually considered as tribes and not INDIGENOUS in modern Morocco.
Moors also ruled over Portugal, too as well
Lies 😂 why u make everyone everything black the moors are morrocans
one doesn’t necessarily exclude the other. there are black moroccans and they’ve always existed.
the Moors were NOT black SubSaharan africans, they were mostly BERBER; they came from Morroco, Lybia, Tunisia, Algeria....but they had THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of Sub Saharan SLAVES.....SECOND; the Moors DID NOT bring ANYTHING significant to the Iberian Peninsula, especially "Mathematics" and "Astronomy"....what they did bring was SLAVERY....DECAPITATIONS...CASTRATIONS....MISERY...OPRESSION....just like they do TODAY in their own Countries....the MOORS were NOT Sub Saharan africans, STOP playing stupid games and get REAL !!
@@selmaferdjioui5873 ....they were SLAVES !....in REAL LIFE, the Arabs and Muslims ENSLAVED....CASTRATED....DECAPITATED....EXPLORED black africans for THOUSANDS of years before any European set foot in Sub Sahara africa....some 15 MILLION of them to be exact for the duration of 1600 YEARS straight....History is a BITCH, hum?
@@selmaferdjioui5873 Those come from the saharan slave trade. There is no such thing as a black moroccan unless by migration or slavery.
@@canelo1728
Exactly these People are clueless of history
No one ever mentions the fact that there were Black Africans living in Europe who were Catholics under the Visigoths. Before Mohammedanism (There was no Quran yet that is why you never see one with the Moors) the North African Coast was dotted with Catholic Monasteries with Black African Monks. The Moors may have had alot of help already in Spain when they arrived.
The Visigoths were Barbaric people
@ExLucifer-i3h I used Spain for lack of a better world. The Fact remains. Blacks were already there.
this is a great fantasy 😂
@@harmanthind2147 Unfortunately you failed to bury the History and replace it with Fantasy. Also all of the Greek and Roman statues were reproductions made during the renaissance which makes them basically FAKE because the Greeks and Romans used to PAINT all of their sculptures yet yours are just White. Another FAIL. You Stay getting caught.
@@harmanthind2147 the fantasy is that after 1000 years of no advancement, europeans just magically exploded with technology and knowledge and spread it around the world, but only after the blks all "disappeared"
Again, who denys history written in stones????
المور هم سكان موريطانيا الطنجية أو ما يسمى الآن المغرب و هم أمازيغ و لا علاقة لهم بسكان إفريقيا جنوب الصحراء. بعد دخول المور لإسبانيا تكونت بعد دلك إمبراطوريات كالمرابطين و الموحدين و المرينيين و السعديين في المغرب و إنظم لها سكان من الصحراء الكبرى كالطوارق و قليل من العرب القادمين من تونس الحالية فأصبح إسم المور يطلق على جميع هذه الإثنيات.
الوجود العربي كبير اترك عنك الكذب يا امازيغي
Please take your lies to someone who cares.
@@alpharius_nox لو ركزتم على تاريخكم كنتم ستجدون حظارات و ثقافات مثل مملكة سنغو و غيرها كانت ستغنيكم عن هذا الكذب السخيف و محاولة السطو الصبيانية على الحضارات الأخرى مثل الحظارة المورية الأمازيغية و الحظارة الفرعونية هههه. التاريخ مكتوب و الكل يعرفه و لن تغيره بفيديو بليد كله أكاذيب أو تعليق مستفز. تحياتي.
@@hamidalhaiane6536 So explain to me why prior to the 20th Century, every mention of Moors, and every depiction of Moors in European sources, was of a society of Arabs and black Africans? For 500 years, the Europeans got it wrong?
@@hamidalhaiane6536 Please explain why the Europeans who created the numerous paintings in this video used black Africans to represent Moors.
Amazing you’re finally admitting this factor of these known factors. The African people need to know that too the whole world need to know it need to be in the history books so they can study and learn the right way.
“ Africans “ are not one people. The history of the moors had nothing to do with history of black African people.
Nearly 800 years of Moorish rule did more than just imprint ideas into and onto Spain. Moors mixed their DNA with Iberians during that time and that remains as much as the ideas do.
@imperialstrategies6065 The Romans invaded and ruled Britain for over 300 years. The Anglo-Saxons invaded and ruled them for 600 years. They were also ruled for 100 years by the Vikings ... they know about, and have experienced, mixing many times. The Moors did have contact with the British Isles and even had settlements in Scotland and England, which is probably why certain flat plains in those areas are called "moors", because those were the areas where the African Moors settled/inhabited.
They also brought fashion to To the culture. The Moors loved fashion they help Europe expand fashion because they one wore one garment the whole year long. It should be movies made about them but we know how Hollywood operates and who controls it.
@SteelerzReignSupremeII and u can literally go see the paintings of the moors and u will see most of them were white, with only some black people, there were more ginger moors then black moors
@@1MarkKeller the moors never had settlements in England, and u have no idea what a moor is, the moors didnt even exhisted, thats what we portuguese and spanish called europeans who converted to islam, so only europeans could be moors, the north africans were called berbers, callin them moors is the most retarded thing ever, Marinid Dynasty, Almoravids, Almohavids, those were their names, so please dont talk about stuff u dont know, also north africans have more iberian blood then iberians have north african blood, in case u dont know it was Portugal who ruled Marroco after this
@@rogernewsomejr4634 lmao, u know that the moors adopted the typical iberian dressing style right? they literally started to use black and yellow "ponchos", wich was the traditional iberain wearing, before that the moors literally all used a "jubba thobe" wich is the same thing muslims wear today and nobody in iberia uses that, so that is just absolutely bullshi, i dont even know where u got that from but id like u to tell me ur sources pls
This is yet another proof that African greatness didn't start today. Africans have always been great. Thanks for the heads up on this fact.
It’s only by ignoring or being mislead about history so we come to believe that every people have no beauty or genius of their own.
Moors weren’t too dark
@@morosultanate692 they were dark theirs no such thing as”too dark” black people come in all shades it can b darkskin brownskin or lightskin we have all skin tones were dark chocolate to white chocolate
Being a coloniser is greatness ? OK.. Europe is the greatest then.
@@huncxo8566 so am i black? Im North African native, the best way i could describe my skin tone would be lightskin and even then they said i wasn’t black, so what am i?
Moor simply mean,: black or dark skinned.
No, it referenced Muslims. Revision history much?
@@stevenbeebe35 - That's what they do. I think the REAL history is too difficult for them to process. :/
No it means Muslim
@@الوزير-د9ص😂😂😂😂😂😂
The Moors were from Mauritania and parts of Algeria, Western Sahara, Tunisia, Morocco, Niger, and Mali.
They were Arabs
@@الوزير-د9ص Africa too
@@الوزير-د9صNo they were Caucasian
The Moors were Arabs and Berbers having nothing to do with Blacks . Andalusia had an arabic culture known through its great poets like Abu Newas and its great scholars like Ibn Sinna , Ibn Roshd ,...writing in perfect arabic.
Their works never mentioned Blacks. When the Moors fled to North Africa, they settled in old North African cities such as Fes, Tlemcen , Algiers , Tunis ...where their descendants still live today, they are known for their fair skin not showing the smallest hint of blackness.
moors were black african from the songhai empire, masamuta force convert his empire to muslim and utilize the arab language, its a religious conversion not conquest, thats what gave the arabs access to west africa and spain, there were no berber civilation, you were nomads , no library no mathematics, thats mali empire and songhai empire, the berbers were nomads traiters queen elizabeth 1 gave the berbers ships of gun powder and guns and the berbers attack the songhai empire destroyed it burn timbuc tu thats how the songhai empire fell if the berebrs were civilize you would still be civilize you were mercinaries with no history the songhai empire included mauritania and south algeria, stop your bullshit there is no berber civilization its black west african mali empire, songhai empire where books and knowledge was more valuable that money up to this day you berbers arabs still attacking black african you were never any civilization, you couldnt develop spain you were mercinaries then you are now
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Moor Etymology = "From Mauritania"
Arab has nothing to do with race, but go ahead and research the first Arabs. They look they were they look today due to the Barbary slave trade when Arabs bought so many White women that it changed the region within 200 years.
@@1SUPR3M3 lies you wouldnt attack and enslave the black population , mauritania still practice shattle slavery songhai empire didnt practice it, the arabs still do, they need to be freed
Blacks want everyone from history that did anything to be black. It is sad and the mainstream is perpetuating it.
While north Africa is indeed on the African continent, is it accurate to call it African? Or is it more accurate to call it Mediterranean? I think its the case as mentioned below that the peoples and cultures of the Mediterranean basin have been in a multi millennial cultural and genetic exchange. The Anglo sphere’s ignorance of Africa as a monoethnic and genetic state represented by the peoples of West Africa is frankly bizarre and inexcusable.
Yes it’s more accurate to call it African. Like you just said it’s on THE CONTINENT OF AFRICA 🤷🏾♂️. Let me ask are you one of those people that call Egypt the Middle East???
Dumb question
You are correct, it is African. Why are people so pressed to make it something else?
This is an odd question …. Would you not consider Northern America , Americans ?
@@clintonpeabody4833 Interesting point. Do Canadians consider themselves Americans. Do Mexicans consider themselves Americans. Or for that matter, do Hondurans, Chileans, Argentines, Brazilians consider themselves Americans. I don’t know the answer to that question. I don’;t know that peoples consider their continental identity first. But again, I don’t know. My initial question is based on cultural and genetics forged by 1000s of years of trade and history. But again, just a question.
Given that the greatest developements in Europe happened after the Moors were kicked out, and not even in the parts of Europe where most advances took place, it takes some mental gymnastics to think they developed it.
It's just idiotic nonsense.
Well they influenced and kickstarted it
Europe has done way more destruction than great developments. Look at all the trash in the air and in the sea as a result of European “development”. Yeah, right… Don’t get me started on y’all.
@@CamElRodriguezSnrJnrIII the only thing that they influenced is pedophillia
What is your primary source for that statement?
Moro > Moreno > Black Man
Mora > Morena > Black Woman
Blackberry in Spanish = Mora
If a North African person with stereotypical Arab facial features were to go to Spain and not tell anyone that he or she is from North Africa, most people would assume that person is a Middle Eastern.
If a Black person goes to Spain, most likely the people there are going to call that person a Moreno or Morena.
CZcams IS A WHOLE UNIVERSITY .. I LOVE ❤ IT .
19:35
It’s a website filled with truth and lies be careful
No it's not. Anyone can post anything and a lot of information is oversimplified, omitted, and exaggerated.
This video is complete hogwash. Good luck with that edumacation.
No it's not! The Umayyad occupation of the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) was made by the Umayyad Caliphate (Arabs) that conquered all Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and North Africa in 7th Century. And then occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) from 8th to 13th Century in Portugal (1249). From 8th to 15th Century in Spain (1492). In terms of Kingdoms it was the Umayyad Caliphate, Fatimids, Almoravids, Almohads and Nasrids. In other words thousands of Arabs, Amazighs and also thousands of Persians and Syrians that the Ummayad Caliphate brought from Mesopotamia and Levante to North Africa. Amazighs (Berber) armies were used by everyone in North Africa. Phoenicians used them. Romans used them. Arabs used them. Pretending that all the Knowledge that Arabs brought to Iberian Peninsula didn't came from Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and Egypt is just being biased. In the end of the day the influences left in the Iberian Peninsula are Arabic. The algebra that we use is Indian-Arabic. Our languages (Portuguese and Spanish) have hundreds of Arabic words adaptions. And Nautical Science, Navigation, Astrolabe, Sextant none of that came from Africa. Iberians were sea people at least since presence of Phoenicians in 1100BC. Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) spread all around the Mediterranean Sea coming from Lebanon, Syria where they emerged in 3000BC. The fact that they used berber cavalry in the Maghreb 'cause they set the Capital of their Carthaginian Empire in Carthage, Tunisia built in 900BC, doesn't make them African.
Portugal was born in 1143 (12th Century) and defeated the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers)) in 1249 (13th Century). That's before Mansa Musas's Mali "Empire" that only florished under the control of the Islamic World and as vassals of the Sultans of Mecca. Portuguese Navy, Nautical Science, Navigation, Boat construction is the result of several Schools the Kingdom implemented bringing Specialist from all the World. In 1415 Portugal started the Age of Discovery by conquering Ceuta (Muslim Moors City in North Africa) and started sailing to get to India around Africa in 1419. And did it with boats and skills that changed World's Nautical History forever. In 1500 Portuguese were already the first Global Empire of the World with territories in all Continents. From China to Brasil. What Portuguese found in Southern Regions of Africa were primitive tribes not even comparable to Egypt that by that time was already quite primitive when compared to European Empires! Stop propagating lies you're embarassing yourselves (Americans) and real Africans! Best Regards from Portugal, American Kangz!
❤🇯🇵🇨🇳🇲🇾🇮🇳🇪🇹🇲🇿🇦🇴🇬🇼🇸🇹🇨🇻🇲🇦🇵🇹🇧🇷🇨🇦
Blackwashing history. Moors were arabic, not sub-saharian black. Just look at actual paintings in sevilla for example, not fakes form internet
We all know the moors were black also at that time Africa was a black mans world
@@ericedwards1301no , North Africa has never been black , if it were the Blacks would be the majority today which is not the case. All of Africa was colonized by foreigners and wherever Blacks were a majority they still are.
No, Moors were Amazigh.
@@ericedwards1301Stop that idiotic Afrocentric claims, Amazigh are there from the beginnig, Moors are Modern day Moroccans.
@Handrix-hf3zj Andalusia had an arabic culture, the Moors were Arabs and Berbers, and couldn't have an arabic culture without Arabs .
The moors are the Amazigh people, the indigenous people of North Africa, we have our own gene pool. We ,the North African are NOT from Sub Sahara Africa. During Almohad and Almoravid dynasty, the Moors used the sub Saharan African to fight in Al Andalouse . Read the history before spreading wrong false history. Stop stealing other people's heritage. Ancient Egyptians, the Moors and the Carthaginian are North African. Moors are Moroccan of today, ancient Egyptians are the Egyptians of today, Carthaginian are the Tunisian of today. STOP SPREADING FALSE HISTORY.
What about the Arabs
Spain was muslim for 7 centuries, if you think that the moors of Spain were black, spain would look like colombia now 😂😂😂😂, but modern portuguese and Spanish share lot of similarities in look with north african amazigh and Arabs.
I'm Moroccan and lot of families in Morocco they still have their ancestors houses keys in Spain after they were kicked out.
There were hardly any White people in Columbia compared to Indigenous and African. In parts of Iberia, people are very dark and have a high percentage of both Moorish and later African DNA. Depending on the social structure, it is quite possible to have a segregated population based on religion and caste. Which is pretty much what happened, at least after the formation of Spain and the banishment of the Moors and Jews.
That said, I don't think the Moors were primarily "Black" as we consider it today.
@@GrahamNickerson I'm Moroccan, we still have the clothing traditions, the architecture, the knowledge, the music andalou Arab, medieval spain it's not hard to document, I can list all the muslim dynasties that ruled with names of governors starting from the omayades that has Damascus as capital then the abbaside then almoravide and alomoahade to independent Emirates in andalous, names of scientists : ibn rushed, ibn sina, ibn haitem, ibn tofail, khawarizmi....., all these are brown or white, majority. Of course Arabs and Amazigh used black in army but it's like France used senegalese in WW2.
And morrocans today are not black.
@@easterworshipper730 most are brown, the more you go north the skin get lighter and the opposite if you go south.
@@easterworshipper730 majority not black, majority arabophones and majority of amazigh tribes and look up the amazigh in the pyrmaids they were never described as black people and look up Libyan pharaoh who was from a libyan amazigh tribe and he was never black...man these people are literally stealing our history and heritage in the most ridiculous ways ever, they don't even know how to lie bro, it's so stupid and embarrassing...Mauritania is an old amazigh kingdom that existed along with Numidia and Africa after the fall of Carthage and amazigh tribes are majority non blacks and the skin gets darker as you go south reaching the sahel desert like Tuareg and some modern Mauritanian tribes.
it's like claiming that african americans are the indigenous people of america using the history of slaves in america as an evidence of existence...
The way you know the moors were black is because everytime they are mentioned in European writings they are almost always referring to someone black. There are very little European writings that describe an Arab as a Moor
plus they’d say the word “swarthy” which means dark skinned
@@andreharris144 dark skinned yes but not black
They use bitter tones 😂
@La Pie blanche Swarthy is another way to say dark-skinned. Alot of blacks in America today could be called swarthy.
@@cedricroney1475 “Moor” is an exonym used by Iberian Christians to refer to Iberian Muslims. They were people of Arab, Berber and Iberian origin. They were not black.
An expensive, but sure way to figure out who the Moors are ethnically, is to go visit Morocco or other countries in Northwest Africa. There are some minor differences between early Moors and current north Africa, but their ethnic composition remains largely intact. Two insights will occur: 1) You'll come to realize the word "Africa" isn't always a "black" place. 2) You'll come to realize the overwhelming majority of North Africans are caucasiod Berbers. The closest ethnic relations to North Africa is the eastern Mediterranean and Southern Europe.
Yep. It's just that sub-Saharan Africans love the idea that they 'black people' ruled over Europe at one time. Spoiler, they didn't. There were some black soldiers and slaves, but the Moors were primarily Arabs, Berbers and European Muslims. There is a new rewriting of history by black people where they basically ruled everything, invented everything and were everything. AI is making it even worse, because now they can generate fake AI photos depicting themselves as kings and so on, and people are unfortunately stupid enough to believe it.
Unfortunately those amazigh berbers, dont represent the natives, they are not even related anymore. they have more ashkenzai blood then they have north african dna. The morroccan government found a very old mummy in the desert and youll be shocked to see that the real inhabits looked like. Basically like the Twa/Batwa people. The berbers were targeted by islam for their pagan religion, today they embrace the islam.
So we should ignore all contemporary descriptions, all contemporary illustrations of the Moors by people who saw them, and how Moors described themselves, and we should just look at the modern population? Sounds very logical, Pffk.
@@alpharius_nox Mmodern genetics is empirical in nature, and history is more subjective as well. Genetics give us a clear understanding, on a mass statistical scale, of various ethnicities. We can identify genetic material in individuals from Arabia VS Israel VS Sudan Vs Congo VS Spaiin, etc. Of course there are people that exhibit multiple concentrations (i.e. mixed genetics), but we can still discern the various strains of genetics, even in those mixed individuals. Further, we can determine chronology of genetic material based on it's placement in sequencing, in analogy like a skyscraper (whose earliest constructions are closer to the ground). What is empirically seen in Berber countries is a majority of earliest genetics that is NOT the same as later West African, Arabic, or Southern European genetic migrants. This is the native Berber ethnicity that is the oldest in the gene code - uniquely found in this area of North Africa in the highest degree. It's is closest related to the Iberian genome (i.e. early native spaniards share the most similarities with these native berbers, and other peoples, such as subsaharans, are much less related, and when subsaharan DNA is detected in Berber individuals, it is most commonly a small amount that is chronologically at a later date in history, so not the native population at all). This genetic analysis also has a very important aspect to it - it shows that ethnicities, including the Berbers, rarely undergo a deep transition into a "melting pot" over the centuries - that is a false and racist postmodern narrative. Even within a "diverse society", we can still genetically determine who a majority group is, and who came when. History, in this context, is merely a secondary verification of genetics.
@@514Exc Did you flag my first comment to you, because it's not here anymore. Are you one of those fabled "we waz kangz" sophists? It's racist to blackwash African history. There could be dozens of mummies that bear genetic similarities to subsaharans, and that doesn't represent the actual parent ethnicity of most mummies or genetic analysis (or historical accounts). There's always been travelers from nearby countries in history, as well as a minority of relocating migrants, so that doesn't make genetics and history some subjective pot where we can trick people into historical revisionism. Further, let's see those sources for this outlying "black mummy". You are completely lying, in an anti-semetic tone, about ashkenazi DNA amongst Berbers. This same faulty reasoning about outlying mummies is used for Upper Egypt as well. The genetics don't lie. Even places like Spain, which was also a target for muslims, only bears a statistical minority of shared Arabic or Berber DNA, typically only seen in small portions in the deep south. In the central and North of Spain, that minor foreign DNA becomes even statistically smaller, oftentimes nonexistent.
The moors most definitely " civilized" Europe, the Moors were civilized by the Muslim Arabic people. The Arabic people enlighted and civilized the world.
We can see how civilized are Afghanistan and Morocco (ironic mode)
North Africa and Spain have been long part of an european empire, the roman empire. During that time many european lived in Africa long before Arabs. Alger (Iconium) has been founded by Romans for example. Morocco and Spain were even part of the same roman district, the "diocesis Hispaniorum". After the fall of the roman empire, western Europe and north Africa has been invaded by germanic people such as Goths in Spain, Franks in Gaul and Vandals in Africa. Despite the fall of the empire, links have never really been broken between north Africa and Europe. They all shared the same christian religion and continued to have trade. In the 6th century north Africa was taken back by the eastern roman empire which controled Syria, Egypt and Palestine too. Then came Islam wich led to a profound ceasura between the islamic and the christian part of the mediterranean world. So North Africa had always had more relationship with Europe than with subsaharan Africa separated by a huge desert that was much more difficult to cross than the mediterranean sea.
Africans doesnt mean black. Africa is a roman name, they gave it to Tunisia after they have invaded it and it was inhabited by phoenicians (Carthag) who came from Middle East. So first people named Africans in history were not black. Moors, like Numids were not black. Most of berbers are not black, they even have lighter skin than Arabs. It is true that you also have some black berbers but they live in the southern parts of North Africa like Mauritania. So, it has been during a very short period that some black muslims dominated Spain : the Almoravid dynasty which originated from Mauritania and lasted 50 years before being overthrowed by Almohad who were Arabs.
If there were no Blacks in Northern Africa how did Germany at one point before the genocide of Nazis had dark skinned Germans pictures of the Moors have pigments of black
Aucun noirs n a dirigé l Europe et les almoravides n étaient pas noirs !!!!!!
Good breakdown thanks.
Exactly! "Mouros" for us Portuguese or "Maurus/Mauri" for Roman/Italians didn't refer to the same people necessarily. That's a vague term. For Romans Maurus/Mauri were the Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) and their Amazigh (Berber) armies. For Portuguese and Spanish Mouros were the Umayyad Caliphate, Almoravids, Almohads, Nasrids that occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) in 8th-13th Century in Portugal and 8th-15th Century in Spain. In other words Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers).
Portuguese culture since Medieval Times was influenced by a lot of people Celts, Visigoths, Romans, Phoenicians and also Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians, Amazighs). As was South Italy for example since the Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) 'cause they had territories/ports/cities all around the Mediterranean Sea since 1100BC. From their original Cities in Levante (Lebanon, Syria), to Egypt, Lybia, Tunisia where they built Carthage in 900BC (conquered by Romans in 146BC), Argelia, Morocco, South Iberian Peninsula, Malta, South Italy, South Greece.
Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) used Amazigh (Berber) cavalry. So did Romans in their North African Provinces in Mauretanea (Morocco and Argelia). Not to be confused with nowadays Mauritania, the the Country.
For us Portugal (Born in 1143) the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians, Amazighs) occupation only took 106 years till 1249, when the last Sultan of Algarve was defeated.
African had never been of any European rather invasion to steal. There was never any European religion in Africa before Andalus Islamic development which Europe carry herself high
Simple answer,...No. AN African Moor was a minority, as most were Arabian/Syrian in nature. Africans were very rarely seen in Europe before the beginnings of the slave trade. Historically, north Africa was not black. They were far paler in nature. Arabs are not black.
Your last sentence is flawed there are paintings around the Sahara walls which date from than 10.000 years ago of black / brown peoples
@@Incog80 That is very funny. And who told you that? No human being was on the planet that long ago.
@@karlshaner2453 carbon - testing from the walls. See this is the problem with people like you , you’ve been falsely indoctrinated with misinformation for a long time that it instantly makes you repulsive towards common facts , due to acting self-centred and thinking you can gate-keep others history
That how Europe got out of the dark ages.. It was the Black Moors (Africans) from west Africa and the North east Africa
I'm getting worried about the levels of ignorance and racism in some comments. You guys think History is a children tale you wanna believe in.
@@audiovideando1592that’s literally what this video is about. There’s other countless videos on CZcams about the moors. How is this racist? This is history.
@@thirsty57 The "black" moors? Don't you think that's ignorant and racist? The best known moors nowadays are Zinadine Zidane and Karim Benzema. How black are they? This is the same bullshit as: the ancient Egyptians were black, the Jews were black, Jesus was black. All in the same false and stupid direction.
Because it's fake we are tired of getting our identity stolen by black west Africans and black Americans please get a life man .@@thirsty57
The Umayyad caliphate, whose ruling class were Arabs from Syria got Europe out of dark ages. 😂😂😂😂😂 Why do blacks want to take credit for what Arabs and morrocans did??
Moors has nothing to do with black west Africans..they were arabs,amazighs and Spaniards who converted to Islam
No,the first moors were africans,the word at first was used to speak about muslims from Africa,the first moors in Europe were africans,later the word was used to speak about any muslim.
@@dhsf5937not bantu African they were from north Africa not black.. you know nothing about them not even their names
0:32-0:37 I love how you say Renaissance😊
The moors is moroccans
How do you know?
The blacks were hired warriors! They had nothing to do with all the achievements and intellectual advancements outside of what skills they provided in war.
Official history is false. Everything is false, the winners tell the story.
What ppl fail to understand is that Africa is extremely diverse gemetically...Ethiopians and somalians, and Nubians were and are closer related to Europeans than to West Africans/Bantu
I wouldn't say closer related, because West and East Africa are still Black people from the line of Ham. I would also argue that the only Europeans that are closely related to East Africans are the Greeks and the Romans, and then obviously the inter-mixing of the Arabs. Most Northern Europeans have Neanderthal dna, which majority of these Black African people do not have.
Most Ethiopians that have taken the DNA test are proven to be 100 percent African! can't deny science.
Did the African Moors develop Europe? Depends on what encompassed Europe at the time. And it depends on what you think 'Moors' are. moors simply means Muslim. Moors were not necessarily Sub Saharan Black. In the north of Africa is Egypt, Tunis, Libya and Morocco who are not black. There were Moors in Malta and Sardinia etc and they are not sub Saharan black.
sorry to inform you but the original songhai empire language where the moors originated from was not arabic, mansamuta on his trip to arabia force convert his empire to muslim and adopted the arabic language we still have the original songhai empire language and direct proof they translated it to arabic it was a religious conquest not military also the mali empire, and the songhai empire where knowlwdge was more valuable that money, thats not arabic or mercinary nomad berbers who destroyed the songhai empire, by queen elizabeth the 1 gave them ships of gun powder and guns and they attack the songhai empire burn timbuctu and end african renaisan it you were anything that tradition would have continuted, its beacause it was never you but the black african of the mali and songhai empire and their adaption of islam contributed to the slow deprogress of the empire
first of all the word black was invented by a racist caucasian man we are not black secondly word white was also invented if you tell me you look white then u must be sick in the head also moors are darkskin people not black actually
@@sulner9997You can't defend lies. Moors is what European Christians called black people, do a simple research, it's everywhere. The people in North Africa today are simply the descendants of invaders. That land doesn't belong to them just as Palestinian land doesn't belong to so called Jews people in Israel today. Stop lying to yourselves, the truth remains the truth
@@sulner9997 The moors didn't originate from songhai, that's idiotic nonsense. In actual fact the Sahel was ruled by Berbers (whites) who came from North Africa. They introduced civilization and islam and ruled the primitive blacks who had no civilization of their own.
@@EmperorWewuzIII let me educate you the moors were not arabs or berbers the moors accepted arabs and berbers because of their muslim religion, thats why you claim them but the muslim arabs were black slavers women couldnt do maths or science, the moors were tolerant of jews their university linked back to timbuctu not north africa you had non when the mercinary berbers which is what you are got gun powder along with morroco and attack the songhai empire all of the golden age of africa stopped, most of the maths and science and enginering from the moors the navigation equiptment was built in timbuctu, if you were the moors and you attacked the songhai empire and destroyed it, your moor golden age should have continued, what took over was radical islam and piracy, timbucktu was the centewr of learning anf knowledge from the mali empire to ghana to songhai and the arabs and berbers of north africa didnt build anything close to it, when songhai fell the progress stopped whether you like it or not. because the moors were not a monolithic group you claim them but when timbucktu fell their was no more progress, why didnt you build some university up in algeria and morocco if you were the moors only one civilization didi that in that area and its timbucktu
The moors weren’t all black only some of them were. moors are not a ethnicity they are just muslims native from africa.
Find the definition of black before commenting
You are right and the first army to march to Spain where mostly Moors who are barber not blacks (Sudans).
@@Crypto-News.Arabic barber? Or Berber? They were great in cut and shave😂
the Moors ruled europe for more than 800 years ? (16.min45) okay, not so much, it was majority of hispania, there were other Large empires at the time, Al-Andalus was big, strong and important for sure but one of a number of such important Empires.
After 500 years (750-1250) central Iberia was back in christian rulers, only in the south the Emirate of granada lasted 300 more years.
Also, if history is so wrong and Black Folks were involved all over, where have Black people in europe been then ?
I love the Black African Nations and Cultures, Mali, Nigeria, Kongo, I love the walls of Benin and the stories about it. Black History does not need White Charity. i wish you all a great day !
Did the Moors civilize Europe ? nope, the influenced of course in many good ways, but they were not the only nor the strongest influence at the time. whats happening here?
Moorse were also black
So it would be great if the Moors from Africa develop Africa now. It's high time they did that.Then they can spread that knowledge to all the other impoverished countries. Africa and India need the Moors badly in the 21st century. So come on Moors, where are you when you are needed ?
Moor was a derogatory term used by Christians to describe Muslims in Spain. Moor did NOT mean black African. There were black soldiers as mercenaries in Muslim armies who were called “ black moors “ but they were never part of any ruling elite or native population anywhere outside of subsaharan Africa and Sahel region.
Also moors did not civilized Europe. This is totally a LIE. In fact Europe was gradually recovering itself after 8-9th century and Islamic invasion of North Africa and Iberian peninsula stopped that progress
Yes they civilized your ancestors otherwise you wouldnt enjoying the privilege to use the internet
@@Mauri7782 west africans did take zimbabwe 1000 years before europeans came..and did develop trade routes to sell "meat "
europeans did develop "the breadbasket" in less than 100 years ...what pattern do we recognize
Lol there were tropical Africans in ruling elite positions in Arab territories so why wouldn’t there have been in Europe?
@@dorianduka West Africans didn’t know the existence of wheel until 19th century when western civilization introduced it to them during colonial era. What’s your point?
The word Moreno literally comes from the word Moor, meaning dark or dark skinned, you people need to stop your racism corupting your ability to learn the truth.
The bible and history must be put back into their rightful places.....
Prior to the Arab conquest of North Africa, Jews lived all throughout the coast and also within the interiors of the Sudan & Western Africa. . The ethnic population of the Moorish Empire consisted of Arabs, Native African Berber Tribes & Jews. . There were also many Jews at this time who had adopted Islam within the coasts of Africa because of the Arab conquest
Travels In Africa By Nahum Slouschz 1927 Page 365
However in 711AD, the conquest of Spain was again undertaken, this time by the Musselmans in concert WITH THE JEWS. The first one to set foot on the soil of Spain was General Tarif (“a Jew of the tribe of Simeon”), after whom the island of Tarifa, opposite Tangiers, was named. Another Israelite Berber chief, named Kaulan el Yehudi, followed the Arabs into Spain and, after the peninsula had been occupied by the Mussalmans, tried to raise a REBELLION AGAINST THEM. Among other Jews connected with the conquest of Spain were two sons of the Cahena, at the head of the army of Jerua.
stay down ,clown
Jews still live happily in North Africa especially Morocco (Maur-oc = maur land) where they are still most welcome today
💯💯
When you say Jews be specific. Because these fake Ashkenazi Khazarian Jews will take credit for something they were not involved in. So when you say Jews pls define that you mean Arab Jews or Black Jews or both. But definitely not white Jews
thanks for using real artwork vs goofy ai generated images….only if the moors woulda went south how the history would have turned for the better
Yes the moors picked up europa and brought civilization back to them ...thats why every secret society honors the Fez....most castles and cathedrals were created and built by moors....🙏🤚
Moors were mainly in Spain, most castles and cathedrals aren't there.
@alwa4735 sure..and a biological man can get pregnant 👍
Right on
Great comment alot of people don't know about the Fez in those secret society. They also honors the Koran
@rogernewsomejr4634 🙏..the Koran, Torah, bagavagita...etc are science books ....these secret societies around the world can end many debates that plaques modern times but then power will be gone...sad..
Moors are Moroccans
Results of white sex concubines are not moroccans
And Malian
@@BranMan10 haha 😂 the empire of Moroccans started from Morocco to Spain until Senegal no mali bro Mali was a kingdom back then and moors are Moroccans this is why Moroccans in Spain are called until now the moros which is moors in Spanish
Bro these sons of white spanish concubines are tiring
Bruh they still walking with baskets on there heads
Still better than a Walmart bag😂
Short answer: NO.
I am from north Morocco and I got light skin dark hair .I did my DNA 99% north African ( Amazigh) In history also my great parent lived in Al Andalus . Like many Moroccan the percentage of Arab dna is less than 1% in Moroccan. We do have Arabic culture bc islam 🤍and north African culture 🤍bc we r the native people of north of Africa . Morocco got oldest sapien skull means all humans are all Moroccan. And we are diverse in how we look like . We admire all races and all cultures .Moroccan got mixte little with Iberian at Al Andalus time . Moroccan got also mixte with our brother from sub sahar african countries ( dark skin) . Moroccan are proud to be African and Amazigh and Arab ( culture ). Some Arab came to North Africa and brought islam but got married to Amazigh berber women so the Arab dna is very little in North of Africa . Dna studies prove it . We still admire Arabic culture bc the believes but we r not Arab
Amazighs are mixed at least since Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) that came from Levante (Lebanon, Syria) and Roman Era. That just is incorporated in a North African label. I'm from Algarve, Portugal. We're not different visually. Cristiano Ronaldo and Gonçalo Ramos are also Moorish-Portuguese as i am. Best Regards from Portugal.
🇵🇹❤🇲🇦
we know history and more of the truth is coming out when the berbers with help from queen elizabeth 1 attack the songhai empire and burn timbuctu african progress stopped timbuctu was the place of all the knowledge not nomads berbers or arabs, you should familarize yourself with theThe Songhai Empire at its zenith extended over the current territories of Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Mauritania, Senegal, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Gambia, Burkina Faso southern algeria all the sahel if you knew that there was no berber civilization they just used you to destroy the songhai empire and all those progress stoppped, you didnt continued it
Cwmraeg Welsh people hello! We're descended from amazigh 🙋♀️
it has no meaning
@@Novikedocumentaryexactly. This post was pretty irrelevant
The Moors had some blacks, yes, but they were mostly white/Arab-looking Berbers.
It's critical to understand Hamilcar Barca the father of Hannibal Barca Is the founder of the city Barcelona.
We have a book called The Royal African War Elephant and it is the first of its kind containing the sources of documents and images of the African use of the war elephant in sub-Saharan africa. Available on all online markets.
The Royal African war elephant
Interesting you say this, it is only sub-Saharan Africa or Black Africa that would use Elephants in war. If Hannibal was not fully Black, which I personally think he was, he was definitely part Black African, it has been stated that his father was full Black African, and his mother was a concubine slave of White European origin.
@@treycampbell3533 quite possible.
The Barcids founding Barcelona is an urban legend. Under the Ebro Treaty with Rome, Carthaginian influence in Iberia was confined to lands south of the Ebro River, while Barcelona is north of it. The main Spanish city of note that was founded by the Carthaginians is Cartagena (Qart Hadasht), which was founded by Hannibal's brother-in-law, Hasdrubal.
Who denys history written in stones?????
Africans were the original inhabitors of what is today called Europe, The Aryan speaking tribes migrated to this area. H.G. Wells "Outline of History" is a very good book concerning world history if you are really interested in the truth.
you do know that there are places in what old "european" dna is even today in majority and that people we speak about are identical to indo europeans in appearance
and for you ..from south to north ....from Hofmeyer scull to nazlet khater..we have been even south of Sahara long before you have been made
"aryans" as in romani from india ? it is true that these aryans migrated to europe
but if you mean blonde hair blue eyed, didn't they originate from the scandinavian countries ?
@@kwanchan6745
blonde hair originated in ANE populations of Siberia most close to ancestors of Amerindians around 16 000 years ago ,Afontova Gora is the oldest fossil ( ANE are ancestors of countless populations ..from old pre Indo European population of Europe,to Indo Europeans and Amerindians...)
blue eyed comes from Indo Europeans ..either from east Europe or from Anatolia 10 000 years ago
And for Indo Europeans ...in essence for Europeans that are Anatolians ..they have been around in Europe for almost 20 000 years but they did start with "aggressive " expansion around 6 000 years ago that did end their cousins like western hunter gatherers
@ServantofKemet interesting name ..why is oldest fossil in Egypt ...nazlet khater ...similar to fossils south of Egypt of that time a European (well ANE but for you.... people... that is the same ) ?
false. You people are hilarious.
@CanaryKin and @siminho10 Both of you are dead wrong. The muslim empire was centered around al-andalus and only with its decline did the center move to north africa. The first attempt was made by the almoravids who came from mauritania. They were succeeded by the almohads who were ruled by a family from Nedroma, an algerian city. Neither the almoravids nor the almohads were indigenous to the entity now called morocco. Both chose capitals in that entity for geopolitical reasons. As for the ethnicity of the Moors, they were Berbers. They were mostly brown-skinned people. They were in fact neither black nor white as some have made them to be. The europeans, in both art and literature, painted them as blacks in opposition to white europeans. The muslim armies also included blacks who converted to Islam. Slavery was an integral part of the Muslim empire and this very fact undermines the thesis that the moors were black-skinned people. As I have shown in a nutshell, this is the complex reality that the proponents of the opposite theses are unable of grasping.
African Moors were not black as portrayed in this video they were North African and they looked like Middle Easterners
They were black Africans are black the North Africans u see today are invaders from the Middle East their not native to africa
Why would the European artists who were very prejudice at the time portray them that way then?
Please leave as you are a distraction that we no longer need. Moors were BLACK!!!!
@@ajgraves8016 exactly, why would the european painters paint them all dark shades of brown, I need yt ppl to make it make sense.
This is why europeans do not like yt americans they know they try to rewrite history and cannot handle people of color were civilized earlier before them.
Keep in mind if Noah had 3 sons they all must have looked alike starting off....Ihe american yt (not the european) looks so different from other european ethnicities and refuse to believe africa started off dark ( i do not say black as it is a crayon color)....maybe americans yt are trying to tell us they did not come from any of noahs 3 sons and are instead a created race or maybe they come from ESAU and we all know yahweh hated esau. This would make sense why they aboriginals /natives of any country so much
The moors are not really a ethnic group or not even really a group theses are just muslims native from africa.
Moors i juste Amazighs from Morocco.
And arabs from arabia
Both together
This is not true! The Umayyad occupation of the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) was made by the Umayyad Caliphate (Arabs) that conquered all Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and North Africa in 7th Century. And then occupied the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) from 8th to 13th Century in Portugal (1249). From 8th to 15th Century in Spain (1492). In terms of Kingdoms it was the Umayyad Caliphate, Fatimids, Almoravids, Almohads and Nasrids. In other words thousands of Arabs, Amazighs and also thousands of Persians and Syrians that the Ummayad Caliphate brought from Mesopotamia and Levante to North Africa. Amazighs (Berber) armies were used by everyone in North Africa. Phoenicians used them. Romans used them. Arabs used them. Pretending that all the Knowledge that Arabs brought to Iberian Peninsula didn't came from Arabia, Mesopotamia, Levante and Egypt is just being biased. In the end of the day the influences left in the Iberian Peninsula are Arabic. The algebra that we use is Indian-Arabic. Our languages (Portuguese and Spanish) have hundreds of Arabic words adaptions. And Nautical Science, Navigation, Astrolabe, Sextant none of that came from Africa. Iberians were sea people at least since presence of Phoenicians in 1100BC. Phoenicians (Carthaginian Empire) spread all around the Mediterranean Sea coming from Lebanon, Syria where they emerged in 3000BC. The fact that they used berber cavalry in the Maghreb 'cause they set the Capital of their Carthaginian Empire in Carthage, Tunisia built in 900BC, doesn't make them African.
Portugal was born in 1143 (12th Century) and defeated the Muslim Moors (Arabs, Persians, Syrians and Amazighs (Berbers)) in 1249 (13th Century). That's before Mansa Musas's Mali "Empire" that only florished under the control of the Islamic World and as vassals of the Sultans of Mecca. Portuguese Navy, Nautical Science, Navigation, Boat construction is the result of several Schools the Kingdom implemented bringing Specialist from all the World. In 1415 Portugal started the Age of Discovery by conquering Ceuta (Muslim Moors City in North Africa) and started sailing to get to India around Africa in 1419. And did it with boats and skills that changed World's Nautical History forever. In 1500 Portuguese were already the first Global Empire of the World with territories in all Continents. From China to Brasil. What Portuguese found in Southern Regions of Africa were primitive tribes not even comparable to Egypt that by that time was already quite primitive when compared to European Empires! Stop propagating lies you're embarassing yourselves (Americans) and real Africans! Best Regards from Portugal, American Kangz!
❤🇯🇵🇨🇳🇲🇾🇹🇭🇹🇱🇱🇰🇮🇳🇪🇹🇲🇿🇦🇴🇬🇼🇸🇹🇨🇻🇵🇹🇧🇷
All of that for nothing. Fragility.
@@shinebright2898he wrote a whole book novel for nothing smh
@@explodev2550lol for real
Waste of ink
@@shinebright2898 Fragility is not knowing your own ancestors history. Research Asante (Ghana), Dahomey and Kingdom of Benin (Nowadays Benin and Nigeria), Kingdom of Kongo and Queen Nzinga (Angola). Those are the responsibles for capturing and trading your ancestors just like gold or ivory. You've got nothing to do with Amazighs from the Maghreb Region. We know our History so do our dear Moroccan neighbours. We don't accept Americans trying to re-write History with their Netflix and Hollywood Fairy Tales. Your history is 247 years old, American. Embrace it!
I had Iberian Peninsula on my DNA report. I didn't know what or where it came from at the time.
Before anyone refers to the Roman Empire as the main influence of civilising of the European continent, do not forget all the other empires that existed before the Roman Empire.
In fact if you look back in history beyond the Roman Empire, you will discover that many of those that preceded the Roman Empire originated from the East and South of the Mediterranean.
Prior to those earlier empires, Europe was considered lands populated by barbarians. In fact, the Romans, you could say, were civilised by these earlier empire builders, and could only continue to spread the knowledge they learned from these earlier conquerors.
I think it would be more realistic for us to admit to the fact that our collective knowledge has always been built on older knowledge throughout history and from peoples who came before us from other civilisations that were more advanced than ours at an earlier time.
Europe wasn't civilized by anyone, it developed its own civilizations. Greece and Rome were the most advanced civilizations of their time. Europeans already conquered half the known world with the Indo-European expansions in the Bronze Age, then they did it again with the Greeks and Romans, then they did it again in the modern era.
I stand corrected, as not all Europeans were considered barbarians by the ancients, mostly the Western and Northern Europeans.
No doubt, the Romans acquired much of the learned knowledge from the Greeks and possibly also the Anatolians and made much further advancements and refinements. But let's not forget the Romans were not in existence when the Greeks were at their zenith, and were considered not much more than barbarians.
The Greeks, in turn, were only able to develop their civilization on the backs of the Egyptians and Mesopotamians. Which if you well know, are not considered parts of Europe.
And I'm sure, despite the little that is known today, for sure, where the Egyptians and Mesopotamians piggybacked their learning from, to think any civilization could actually magically become civilised without the help of earlier peoples is nothing short of naivete.
Let me go a step further by pointing out that if it was not for the conquest and occupation of the Iberian Peninsula by the Umayyad Empire, Greek philosophy, mathematics and even medicine would have been lost forever because of the fall of Rome Empire and the ensuing dark ages.
Just as no man is an island, so neither is any collective of people able to advance on their own steam alone.
Answer: No
Lol , The owner of the video has colored the characters in black, and they are Moroccan images from historical sources. Stop lying
😆🤣 you sound mad the thruth don't care about your feelings
@@hanifmartin7505 actually guys you know nothing about this empire but some of it people from the sub saharian were black , are you know how this empire burn ? In which place ? Whats it religion? …
Don't you consider people with even 2% black genes to be black? What's the problem now? Your just so mad that a darker group of people were able to do this. They were black! Accept the truth, they helped to build European society up, and the grudge in you try to tear theirs down. Only missing a horn and a tail, Devils!
@@morosultanate692 start using logic brother ... you're coloring your thinking with emotions
mulattos are derivatives of the black race. just because they dont look like chris brown doesnt mean they dont come from the black race because there were variations of "black" before the mixing began to create subraces. i.e hispanics, north africans, arabs, etc. these black races mixed with neanderthal/denisovan women to create you.
first of all, read this the first, who mentioned the name of Maur
the maur is recorded as the native name by Strabo in the early 1st century
The Moors were also mentioned by Tacitus as having revolted against the Roman Empire in 24 Ad.
the word "Moor" traced back to the Phoenician term Mahurin
meaning "Westerners". and the name of the country now is Morocco meaning is the west too,The word "Moor" is of Phoenician origin. It's not Greek origin at all.the moor is an ethnic who lived in the actual place Morocco.our first knowing king is Baga 250bc to the great one bocchus the first.their land was ,from tingis in the north to do Essaouira city in the south and from Mulucha river in the est to anfa in west.and the capital was betwin Volubilis and tamuda and chala/and then bocchus the first took the half Nomidane land after the fall of Jugurtha.
we are not black we are not white we are not arab we are not philippine we are the moor with brun skin or Olive color.....stope changing our history i know that France,Spain,greece,and more.... they did all the possible to hide our glory our nation. even France named a land far away from us mauritanian just To distract our history ,They are jealous from our history from our pure nation.arabs comes to our land 1000years ago but they will never be the moor the black people they came to our land in time of saadi dynaste and alawit dynaste as slaves and solgers but the will never be moor.sorry but this is the true history .
the catty west world did you know that all the metologie of grrec comes from our land ,the king atlas is frome our holyland morocco [Atlas de Maurétanie],Hercules Fighting Antaeusin our land and the grave of antaeusin is in morocco too ,tinjis[the city] is the wife of antaeusin too the montans in morocco took the name from king Atlas de Maurétanie.........the west trie to hide our glory our history they even changed our name from the maur to amazigh, the france damned
there are a lot of moroccan like me, they know thier glory we will protect our land our history our glory our ethnic.we will make books videos we will do everything to protect our moorish nation
WE WUZ KANGZ N SHEIT.
They wuze Kings and Sheit 🤣
@SteelerzReignSupremeII
Yes we were my slave
Thy spoke Arabic,wrote in Arabic and practiced Islam...Not spoke Swahili wrote in ,, "" there is no Negroid writing system"",,,and practiced voodu 😅..
There are several negro writing systems smh...many that predate Arabic
Moors are not black Africans they are people from North Africa
But they are BLACK
The Moors enslaved the Mali, you forgot that part. Mansa Munsa spent all his money, told his mercenary army of Moors and North Africans, Egyptians and Persians, that he had another gold mine discovered, after a year of waiting, His Mercenary Army began grabing the people for Mansa Munsa's debts. This started the Mali slave trade.
No, the Moors did not enslave Mali. Mali is a West African country that was once part of the Mali Empire, a powerful and wealthy state that flourished from the 13th to the 16th century. The Mali Empire had trade and diplomatic relations with the Moors, who were mainly based in North Africa and Spain. The Moors did not conquer or enslave Mali, but they did influence its culture, religion and architecture.
@@eingoluq oh yes they did, the university of Timbuktu has 10 of thousands of scrolls and records of the enslavement. Mali had no army of it's own. Mansa Munsa tried but gave up and went with all mercenary.
@@constantinople777christens5 everybody enslaved people form everywhere else. But that doesn't mean the entire of Mali wad enslaved by the Moors. That is asinine.
You're so full of shit you don't even know Mansa Musa was born into Islam already. The area was already converted to Islam. And it is illegal and haram to enslave another Muslim. In fact most of north Africa including Berber converted to Islam to prevent themselves from being enslaved.
So wtf are you talking about? The moors and Mali fought a lot. But they didn't enslave the entire lot of them. Mali sold slaves local and forgeign including Berber slaves to the Moors.
But to sit there and suggest they were enslaved by them means you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
One thing we do know is that after the reconquista the Barbary pirayes which included Black Africans, raided Europe and took white people as slaves. Some found their way to areas in and around Mali.
@@constantinople777christens5 Wait did you say Mali had no military of their own? now I know you pulling shit out of your arse...
You, the ignorant dumb ass that you are just said, Mali, the country that was an Empire, that expanded and dominated Western Africa and held sway over large swats of territory, with the largest gold reserves in the world, who was so large that when they marched through Egypt with their king and damaged the Egyptian economy, had no army to protect him and his riches?
You are either insane or a moron. The Mali empire army was famously large, and not to be trifled with. They even had names for their ranks of men. For instance, a Sangaran, was a commander with 10,000 men under him, while a Sere is a commander with 1,000. There were names for other sizes too. They even had terra cotta statues of their cavalry units. my god man you are a dumbass.
🤣🤣🤣
Please answer this. If The Mali Empire had no army how did they conquer so many other states? How did they defend their own independence for so many hundreds of years? With so much wealth someone would have long since invaded and taken control of the source of all that wealth.
@Wiserhuman1 Your comment shows that you have a superficial grasp of history and a proclivity to exaggerate the role that Morocco had played in al-Andalus and in North Africa.
Morocco is the only country in North Africa where indigenous elites played a minor role in state-formation. Indeed, the Idrissids (Saudi Arabia), the Zirids (Algeria) the Almoravids (Mauritania-Western Sahara), the Almohads (the rulers were from Nedroma, Algeria), the Merinids/Wattasids (Algeria), had their origins outside of al-maghreb al-aqsa, the true name of Morocco.
All history books attest to this fact (see my bibliography) and to the fact that al maghreb el aqsa played a minor role in the history of al-Andalus and in North Africa.
I have emphasized this point in a previous commentary. I also provide a list of books that support this viewpoint.
As I have underscored in a previous commentary, the non-moroccan dynasties of the Almoravids, of the Almohads and the Mernids had intervened in Al-Andalus at the time of the reconquista. They were unable to turn the tide of warfare in the Iberian Peninsula. These dynasties had built capitals in al maghreb el aqsa for strategic reasons: to be close to Spain in order to wage the Jihad, which was the raison d'être of these dynasties.
It is disingeneous on your part to claim these dynasties which have conquered al maghreb el aqsa (and other territories in North Africa) as Moroccan ones. The Huns had conquered a huge territory in Eastern Europe. But none of the peoples inhabiting that territory has claimed the Huns as their own dynasties.
In short, you are the product of the Makhzen's propaganda and its folie des grandeurs. "Greater Morocco" has existed only in Allal el Fassi's sick mind.
I advise you to read the following books, they will help you free yourself from the Makhzen's propaganda:
Pierre Guichard, Al Andalus, 711-1492: une histoire de l'espagne musulmane;
André Clot, L'espagne musulmane, VIII-XVe siècle,
Philip Conrad, Histoire de la reconquista;
Pierre Guichard et Bruna Siravia, Les royaumes des taifas
The “Makhzen” propaganda.. are you serious dude? For some reason you seem to absolutely want to de-Moroccanize Morocco from its own history. This is an absurd, unrealistic goal and demonstrates how pointless it is to debate with a person like you.
Let's talk about dynasties and their origins. The Almoravids were founded by Abdallah ibn Yasin, a Moroccan who was born in the Moroccan Western Sahara. Some historians suggest that he was born in the Moroccan Sousse. The Almohads were founded by Ibn Tumert who was born in the Moroccan High Atlas. The Merinids were founded by Abu Yahya Abu Bakr ibn Abi Yusuf who's birthplace is estimated to be in morocco due to the fact that he was from the Zenata tribe, more politically active in Morocco. The Wattasids were founded by Abu Abd Allah al-Shaykh Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Wattasi who was also from the zenata tribes .The Saadians were founded by Muhammad al-Mahdi al-Qaim who was born in Sousse. The Alawite dynasty was founded by Moulay Charif who was born in the Tafilalt region.
Moroccans have always played a key role in the founding and development of each of these dynasties. To think otherwise is synonymous with total absurdity and profound irrationality. Morocco has always had an influential role in the Maghreb and has always been an important kingdom in the region. The Moroccans were renowned for their military strength, which is why the Ottomans decided to maintain good relations with Morocco at a time when the Turks were annexing the rest of the Maghreb.
It's not the French who are going to teach us our Moroccan history. We do not depend on foreign historians to come and teach us what happened on our lands.
@@Wiserhuman1You are a lost cause, spinning tales about al maghreb al aqsa whose history was fashioned by foreigners.
If you read the books I mentioned in my previous commentary (which I doubt you will do), everything you have said in your lame response to my commentary would have been for naught.
Unlike you, I always make sure to rely on credible sources to buttress my arguments on every subject I analyze.
I will not waste my time with you anymore since you proved to me once again that you are a lost cause.
Europe is thankful to moorish Spain
And they were rule by black which was moonish black
First university in the world was in Timbuktu! So the influence definitely came from Africa not Arabic people
No it was in Tunis
Moors are not Arabs but people of Mali, Somali, Sudan, Mauritania, Tuareg, Niger and fulani race. Painting with Arab colours won't help you.
Thanks some Light skinned North Africans are trying to revise history by spewing lies about Moors not being of South Saharan Africans are there not Black Libyans Moroccans and Mauritanians
@@nisigate There is nothing negro about historic Berbers or Moors. They are a Northwest African desert coastal people. When black racists with an agenda cherry pick images of Moors, they will always choose the image of a Moor/sub-Saharan negro bastard offspring from the slave trade days. It’s unfortunate, but desperate people will hijack other cultures and claim it as their own. No caucasians
or asians ever claimed to be Greek, Babylonian, Egyptian, or Berber.
Moors are Almoravids. They were berbers from Lemtuna (Sanhaja tribe). Writing such misleading comment wont help you either because we are not black
@SteelerzReignSupremeII
Do it yourself. Or do you need yet another government handout?
@SteelerzReignSupremeIIdo you want source??? Start by reading the Arab chronicles. They explain the conquest of Al-Andalus by the Arabs
Stop pohtoshoping images!! MOORS ARE NOT BLACK!! Yes they are Africans but not blacks the were the Berbers of north Morocco and they were absolutely not black
All music, poetry, prose, novel writing, dancing, musical structure in European civilisation is from Moorish Spain.
Any civilization is described through leadership not through soldiers and labours. Caliphates were exclusively Arabs and North Africans leaders only showed up when the civilization was dying. So not something to be so proud of😅
So we're black the first vikings .is everything backwards😮
Why did you wipe out my comment before I could have posted it?
Probably because you understand that this video is ahistorical.
I think Europeans developed Europe.
Wrong! They can’t even survive without Africa in modern day.
No Caucasians we’re uncivilized until the Africa Moors came….do your research and get over your emotions Albion
@@babyboy562troll
@@babyboy562that's why the caliphate was arab😂😂😂😂 because of black people
@babyboy562 uncivilised how? You realise the Greek and roman empire both far pre date the moors' rule over Spain and the also boast far more impressive contributions to Europe than the moors ever did. .
If the Moor's ruled for 700 years then it was Moor's that founded California & Florida were African that why California name after a black woman 😅 Just something to think about
Europe was already civilized hundreds of years earlier. The Roman Empire? The Greeks? Sure, the Moors invaded during the dark ages but there was still civilization in Europe at the time. The Byzantine Empire existed, for one. And the Moors only took over Spain, not all of Europe. I can concede that some advances may have spread over Europe from Moorish Spain, but overstating their influence this much is just crazy.
it was not overstated they brought ship building mathermatics university 17 university they made you what you were lionardo divenchi who you celebrate, a moor did a fix wing flight hundered of years before it work but didnt landed well the moors built europe it was the most significant development in histore just read your history where britain france traslate the more maths and scientific method to their language
@@sulner9997 You can barely spell, I don't trust a word you type. The Moors had a massive population and invaded a weal europe (ineffectively). Look at Africa today. They've still not built or innovated a damn thing. An embarrassment.
@@sulner9997 I think their influence is big but overstated. Renaissance didn't start from Spain where moors were mainly located and they didn't built Europe. Spain wasn't as influential as other european countries (where moors never ruled). Moreover, their rule wasn't always as peaceful and beneficial for native population of tha land they colonized.
@@alwa4735 oxford university was built from Spain through the Jews, also the french plus they translate their science books and rewritten it in their local language, the Renaissance couldn't happen in a vacuum you need a develop country to piggy back off and now we know it was moorish Spain, like the united states' rebuilt Europe Japan , Taiwan , south Korea
@@sulner9997 Oxford wasn't built from Spain. This doesn't make any sense. Why moors would build universities in a far away countries? Why reaissance didn't originate from Spain?
United States borrowed money for some european countries after WWII and it wasn't done without their own interest in it. Some countries used those money in a better way and that's why there were different outcomes in creating successful economies. US can't take credit for achievments of Germany, Japan and the rest.
You are right that renaissance could't happen in a vacuum. It started in Florence, Italy. There was an increased inerest in achievments and art od ancient Greece and Rome. Muslims, to their credit, copied and preserved knowlegde from many ancient manuscripts from those civilisations.
Truth.
I think we should teach Arabic numerals in our schools.
Why
I think we ought to bin all these foreign extremist ideologies and concentrate our focus on reality.
Lol we do😂
This is an underrated comment
Already these are not Arabic numerals the real meaning but the FÉS numerals in reference to the oldest universities in the world where the origin of these numerals comes from. the Arabs simply erased them to make people believe that their origin is in the Middle East
Morocco is the Capital of the moorish peoples 🇲🇦
And they left a gorgeous architecture legacy, plus cuisine influence. Alhambra is one of the best examples.
I don’t understand what do moors in Spain and Portugal have to do with black Africans. There was never any black civilization anywhere outside of subsaharan Africa.
@@st3019 The Moorish empire (blacks) we're in control of a large portion of Europe (Large parts of Spain and Portugal included) for around 400 years.
Alhambra is build by christians and paid by jews.
Ask in Granada
Alhambra was built in 13th Century by Nasrids! Arabs!
@@st3019 They had black slaves, that's about it. They often castrated the males and used the females as sex slaves. Now blacks idolize the people who enslaved, castrated and raped them.
The moors had an arabic, anazigh and islamic culture, they were not black. Their descendants are still alive today in north Africa
The Moors were black fool 😂 I know you can't stand the truth but it is what it is😂😂
Eventhough there's an argument that suggest Moors to be those of Mediterranean and Turkish Ottoman kelt, not in the slightest to be considered African, according to sources, Black Moors were said to be relatively wealthy decorated military commanders and highly sophisticated academics.
The Moors were the original black Berbers who lived in North West Africa. Migrations and race mixing lightened them up through the years.
@@thedebunker1777
Not really, Berber as well as the Moor' culture are actually post Maghreb.
As in, these are modern African ethnicities.
@@thedebunker1777
Btw, tere's no such thing as a Black Berber, It's either your Berber or of Moorish origin or you aren't, there really isn't no in between. It's no different for a modern day Egyptian claiming to be an "Ancient Egyptian", the logic on both instances are flawed eitherway.
@@adeamujale A Black Berber is a Berber who has black or dark skin
@@adeamujale the moors were black people
Moors were not Black. Just because they came from Africa doesn't mean they were Black. They were Arabs who came to Europe through Algeria and Morocco. The Arabs conquered Algeria and Morocco then they went on to conquer the Iberian Peninsula. Learn some damn history.
They also came from Mali, which was a Muslim empire in in West Africa. The people of the Mali Empire were black Africans. Not Arab, not Berber.
They were mostly berbers and arab. A small minority was black.
Moors were NOT Sub Saharan Black as pictured in the video ad. They were arabic, Nor African, much like Egyptians. Some developments were made, certainly. But Northern Europe was highly developed in its own right.
But moor means black
Prove it buddy.. No term term or location as sub-Saharan .. Provide your sources of Moors werent black . Bring them and I will debunk ur lies
@@andersonbin265why do y’all think there’s some invisible line in Africa that keeps dark skinned ppl below it? Mansa musa was a black African that was a moor. Also the richest man to ever live. You think with all the riches he had he never traveled to North Africa with his men? there’s no such thing as “sub Sahara” that was created by racist
@@thirsty57 bro! Im On your Side
@@andersonbin265 lmao my bad bro I thought I was replying to the main comment
❤️ your channel
Thank you.
They came from ancient Americans Phoenicians and more I just seen a book from the 1700s about it kurimeo ahau did a good video about this
🙏🤚...
another L for the America educational system
Kurimeo Ahau .🤣🤣🤣
If I've seen his videos, the guy is really funny, his investigations are more fanciful than the Lord of the Rings. Lol 💀😆
@@EvwienureEjowokeoghene-uh5iq Another L for Africans who don't know their own history to they have to steal the white man's history.
only in fanatasy land does southern spain mean all of europe so when greeks and romans conquered egypt they civilized all of north africa.
It’s important to delve into history through reading, as images alone cannot provide a comprehensive understanding. It’s noteworthy that the Moroccan Sultans employed African soldiers in their armies. Some of these soldiers’ leaders were handsomely compensated by the Sultan, enjoying luxuries such as opulent houses, fine clothing, and companionship. However, their roles were confined to their military duties and they were not involved in the dynastic rule, the Moorish people in general, or the intellectual advancements of the time. These African individuals were hired warriors, their contributions primarily limited to their skills in warfare. Their lifestyle and compensation should not be misconstrued as having a broader influence on the achievements of the dynasties they served.
Why dont you cry more, that should help.
He was Black..
@@govinasimpson170 What they refer to as “black Moors” are "Abid Al Boukhari" or " The black guard of the Sultan", they are not ethnically Moors; they are African soldiers hired to fight for the Moors. Europeans who saw them on the battlefield with the real Moors called them “black Moors”. The Moorish movement in America originated from these African soldiers who went to america in slavery trades..
But what does this have to do with who the Moors were?, like I said, the people of Morocco back then, do not look like the Moroccans now, and Mansa Musa was the richest man in the World and has links to family members that were Moors in Spain, so are you saying that these Moroccan sultans had more power than the richest man in the World?.
@@treycampbell3533 It seems you have some issues with the historical timeline. Andalusia was conquered by the Arabs in 700. After them, it was the Moroccan dynasties of the Almoravids and Almohads who took over the governance of Andalusia in 1080, following the fall of the Umayyad Arabs. The Mali Empire and Mansa Musa, whom you mentioned, were in the 1300s, which is 600 years after the Arab conquest and 300 years after the Moorish conquest. Do you see that you do not have a good grasp of the subject? Please learn history from reliable sources, not from propaganda channels.
Good thing we have DNA nowadays and it debunks all these lies