It's Finale time on MasterChef, and judges Andy Allen and Poh Ling Yeow tell us why they love Nat and Pezza so much! #MasterChefAU #AndyAllen #PohLingYeow
I felt throughout the season, Andy was biased and wanted Sav to do better until her attitude got the best of her when she spoke back to him during the semiz, and that was her downfall,that and the curries could only get her so far. So happy Nat won, tho i wished Pezza had.
Sav should have been voted out a long time ago…BUT THE JUDGES DRAGGED HER ALONG BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT…that is also why Nat won.
JUdges are so biased this season...nat cooked overcooked rice,sha didn't come in pressure test..she put raw fish, she didn't get eliminated...In semifinals her tart was very hard..but judges selected her over sav...In finale scotch eggs...such a basic dish..& pezza in pressure test he got only one element bad, all other dish is perfect but nat has so many flaws but they selected her....mimi was so creative than her...Po & other female judges , this time andy also so biased this seson...JUst like austarilian brekdancing...
For Finale, it is not fair to have dessert pressure test. Instead you should allow contestants the freedom to cook 3 dishes (entre, main & dessert ) like in the semifinal.
Poor judgement from the judges.. Nat was all over the place the whole competition, she is a good cooker that's all, instead Pezza was outstanding in all his diches along the competition.. judges should've take that in the finale .. disappointing
Nat has been front-runner since her 1st in the show and then struggling in top4 cuz its tight while Pezza is james doe from start no ones reckon him + got himself through pressure tast a lot and then just improving after back from Hong Kong in the time that crunch. Even him improved, his idea of ribeye n veg final doesn't scream winning material. I'm fine that you stick to basic dish but didn't put creativity touch on it? or even perhaps nailed everything on it?. Both didn't do impressive and tied in round 2 so is came down to signature dish each made in round 1....and Nat won because of that🎉
Pezza was brilliant, so much better than Nat….everyone could see how biased the judges was, because they wanted to be political correct and make a person of colour the winner. PEZZA WAS BY FAR THE BEST.
PEZZA should won last night because they love his desert but it was not all there but taste good they didn’t like Nat desert because the chocolate thing she did to hard
I totally agree with you, sav should never have left, the judges thought her desert was the best then they sent her home, picked Nat and threw Tassie in to make themselves look good, well it doesn't wash with me, totally gone to the pack without jock end of story......won't ever be watching again
If he didn't MISSED the big thing which is Malt teaser that Claire mentioned all along, Pezza would get declared as winner which is didn't. He finishes just half of dish how come he gonna get 10? 9? Or even8? Cuz he gets himself to had half of score in beginning served. Both had flaws so that still tied in round 2 but his unimaginative round 1 dish cause him to be runner up when he can comeback at round 2.
We are so proud of Pezza, being Tasmanian
Tasmanian butcher should not overshadow the Tasmanian Devil.
PEZZA WON MY HEARTTT
Mine, too. I think he was the winner 🏆.
i loves all the judges this season
So happy for Nat! Well done!
She is more versatile than Pezza. Australians should acknowledge her as an Australian. Else she should move to Thailand to set up her restaurant.
@@cac1504do people not acknowledge her as Australian?
dude.. i cried when pezza lost. just why? just 3 points. 3 points pezz, if you see this, i believe in you, you got this. good job nat.
Congratulations Nat🎉 Pezza for me you are winner 🥳
I agree
I felt throughout the season, Andy was biased and wanted Sav to do better until her attitude got the best of her when she spoke back to him during the semiz, and that was her downfall,that and the curries could only get her so far. So happy Nat won, tho i wished Pezza had.
♥️🇹🇭♥️🙏 love you ❤
Sav should have been voted out a long time ago…BUT THE JUDGES DRAGGED HER ALONG BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT…that is also why Nat won.
Pizza I am sad I had my hopes high and really the grand prize was going to u the judges were unfair 1st prize Pezza 2nd Sav
Sev was not in the final.
spoilt by music and jumping camera
Andy is my favourite.l love his sense of humour.
THE JUDGES WAS SO UNFAIR WITH PEZZA….he would have gone so far…nobody will remember Nat in a year’s time….THIS WAS SO UNFAIR.
JUdges are so biased this season...nat cooked overcooked rice,sha didn't come in pressure test..she put raw fish, she didn't get eliminated...In semifinals her tart was very hard..but judges selected her over sav...In finale scotch eggs...such a basic dish..& pezza in pressure test he got only one element bad, all other dish is perfect but nat has so many flaws but they selected her....mimi was so creative than her...Po & other female judges , this time andy also so biased this seson...JUst like austarilian brekdancing...
I'd love to see who is the best without the judges hearing what the other judges say.
For Finale, it is not fair to have dessert pressure test. Instead you should allow contestants the freedom to cook 3 dishes (entre, main & dessert ) like in the semifinal.
Like from Larissa's season?
@@nktyronshi9245yes, at least you will not be penalised by just one mistake.
Poor Pezza...
Yeah well his second place again.
Did Poh suffer from her 2nd place?
@@MetteC5he was a bit overconfident from the way he describes his cooking in the final.
@@cac1504 true, that rubbed me the wrong way too
@@MetteC5if only he can be as humble as Harry
Poor judgement from the judges.. Nat was all over the place the whole competition, she is a good cooker that's all, instead Pezza was outstanding in all his diches along the competition.. judges should've take that in the finale .. disappointing
Nat has been front-runner since her 1st in the show and then struggling in top4 cuz its tight while Pezza is james doe from start no ones reckon him + got himself through pressure tast a lot and then just improving after back from Hong Kong in the time that crunch. Even him improved, his idea of ribeye n veg final doesn't scream winning material. I'm fine that you stick to basic dish but didn't put creativity touch on it? or even perhaps nailed everything on it?.
Both didn't do impressive and tied in round 2 so is came down to signature dish each made in round 1....and Nat won because of that🎉
When you cook steak, then a better competition is in MasterChef USA.
Pezza was brilliant, so much better than Nat….everyone could see how biased the judges was, because they wanted to be political correct and make a person of colour the winner. PEZZA WAS BY FAR THE BEST.
PEZZA should won last night because they love his desert but it was not all there but taste good they didn’t like Nat desert because the chocolate thing she did to hard
I totally agree with you, sav should never have left, the judges thought her desert was the best then they sent her home, picked Nat and threw Tassie in to make themselves look good, well it doesn't wash with me, totally gone to the pack without jock end of story......won't ever be watching again
If he didn't MISSED the big thing which is Malt teaser that Claire mentioned all along, Pezza would get declared as winner which is didn't. He finishes just half of dish how come he gonna get 10? 9? Or even8? Cuz he gets himself to had half of score in beginning served. Both had flaws so that still tied in round 2 but his unimaginative round 1 dish cause him to be runner up when he can comeback at round 2.
@@judycripps2606Sav is one dimensional - Sri Lanka food. This is not MasterChef Sri Lanka. If only Sav used kangaroo for her dish.
@@Ryan.D21Andy warned Pezza about the Brussels Sprout at the beginning of the cook but he didn't listen to the advice. That costs him 3 points.
Pezza was lucky to get 7 when half of the dessert was not presented. Remember how Mimi was eliminated.
Pizza should have won