I really enjoyed watching this analysis, Luke! You should do more of these type of videos! I also would like to see that three person pattern to understand it more. If you have two other friends you can do it with and record it would be awesome! :)
What I like to call a 4 ball Cascade (or any even number Cascade) is a 3 ball Cascade pattern but with 4 balls, but since you have one more ball, you throw a multiplex on the second throw. According to your explanation, that wouldn't appease the conditions of a Cascade, or would it?
It all depends on which "rule" of the three ball cascade you want to break so it works with four balls. I say no to multiplexes, but if you're happy with it, go for it :)
I agree that multiplexes would be breaking the rule, you did a really good job breaking down the cascade in your video! This is why I love following your vlogs! I think being a juggler is more about just being able to juggle, it's just as much having an overall comprehension and knowledge of the tricks on top of the ability to execute them! Kudos Luke!
And thanks a ton for the suggestion George! I've been learning how to do 5 ball cascade lately and I'm getting really close to being able to do it consistently! Juggling 5 balls with multiplexes in a 3 ball pattern i feel has actually helped me a bit in being confidant with 5 balls. I was able to pick up the pattern you suggested relatively easily and it's a lot of fun to do!
Having watched the WHOLE video till the end and finding it interesting, I'm just wondering: Does that make me already an advanced juggler or rather a juggling couch potato? Perhaps another topic for a detailed analysis? 😂
If a juggler were to juggle 6 balls in a form of 2 cascades like one using the arms and the other with hands does that count as a 6 ball double cascade?
Very nice - I am disappointed with the results, not the analysis, but will still try "a" four ball cascade. Thanks so much very entertaining and enlightening video.
I think the point of the challenge is to use only two manipulators. I liked one of the patterns you did that almost satisfied the criteria. Very entertaining skills though.
The rhyme would be wrong A three ball cascade goes: 1,2,3 A four ball fountain a-sync: 1,2,3,4 Five ball obviously being: 1,2,3,4,5 Five ball with only four ball is: 1,2,3,4,0 which leaves an odd beat
I like "cheating" with 5 or 6 balls.Like doing a cascade,throwing 1 ball at a time,and after 3 balls crossing the last two using the lower parts of palms.Or 4/5/6 balls shower,where all are thrown,but you "skip" and "boost" by doing 1s with several balls at the same time.It makes the shower much slower and easier.But it is multiplexing,because 1)a ball lands on top of another ball held in palm 2)more than one ball is held at the same time So,they use [22] It is like "golden mechanic rule".You bow the diagram,winning in one dimension,but losing in the other. The even number cascade is impossible because of assymmetry or antiparity of the time and ball spaces.You have to eather not change hands or do synch throws OR "cheat" by temporary holding more one ball or let them land on top of another to "win" some time.OR throw them different heights or put hands or different heights. The MAIN difference between 3 and 5 ball cascades is that the second one DOES NOT have balls crossing at their highest points.So it is a bit of guessing,aiming and counting.
When you say "No ball can have a unique role in the cascade", does that mean the siteswap must be a single number? If it wasn't a single number (or reducible to a single number), then you could have 2 different numbers, and thus 2 different balls doing different things. Applying the rule that average of all the digits of a siteswap is the number of balls in the pattern, any siteswap for a 4 ball cascade would have to be '4'. Now we need to prove whether or not such a siteswap is jugglable.
you can make your own easy czcams.com/video/SyfxIryiD8A/video.html the weight of a juggling ball is between 90-130g. You can even fill it with rice. After I made my own, my skills jumped rapidly compared to the tennis balls. Use easily inflatable balloons, because some are tight and will have a higher chance to break.
my personal definition was always: same height, asynchronous, two hands, inside crossing... so what about this pattern? czcams.com/video/r6NabbqzlDw/video.html yes, there are different hand movements and ist`s the sideswap 4, but I would say that this is a cascade
I'd say this is a mills mess variation that happens to look like a 4 ball cascade, not a cascade. It depends if you think "balls have to cross" means "cross to the other side of the pattern" or "cross to the other hand".
Fantastic video. Love the (exhaustively) comprehensive approach. However, 11:15 onwards for the impatient :-)
Screw basic geometry, I’m going to do a 4 ball cascade anyway!
Edit: it didn’t work...
Lmao
Pure nerdiness which I am looking for, wonderful! It is very detailed and it could even be an academic research paper
Nice! Such a deep analysis! Luke's juggling nerdiness is great (i'm talking in a good way!! :) )
I really enjoyed watching this analysis, Luke! You should do more of these type of videos! I also would like to see that three person pattern to understand it more. If you have two other friends you can do it with and record it would be awesome! :)
What I like to call a 4 ball Cascade (or any even number Cascade) is a 3 ball Cascade pattern but with 4 balls, but since you have one more ball, you throw a multiplex on the second throw. According to your explanation, that wouldn't appease the conditions of a Cascade, or would it?
It all depends on which "rule" of the three ball cascade you want to break so it works with four balls. I say no to multiplexes, but if you're happy with it, go for it :)
I agree that multiplexes would be breaking the rule, you did a really good job breaking down the cascade in your video! This is why I love following your vlogs! I think being a juggler is more about just being able to juggle, it's just as much having an overall comprehension and knowledge of the tricks on top of the ability to execute them! Kudos Luke!
And thanks a ton for the suggestion George! I've been learning how to do 5 ball cascade lately and I'm getting really close to being able to do it consistently! Juggling 5 balls with multiplexes in a 3 ball pattern i feel has actually helped me a bit in being confidant with 5 balls. I was able to pick up the pattern you suggested relatively easily and it's a lot of fun to do!
Lovely stuff. My initial answer was just "Yeah, 53." really interesting seeing just how many things *aren't* a four ball cascade.
Having watched the WHOLE video till the end and finding it interesting, I'm just wondering: Does that make me already an advanced juggler or rather a juggling couch potato? Perhaps another topic for a detailed analysis? 😂
Amazing amigo, really entertained and funny video. I was super curious why wasn't possible a 4 balls cascade and this video explain it all!
Wittgenstein would be proud.
Excellent, in-depth.
If a juggler were to juggle 6 balls in a form of 2 cascades like one using the arms and the other with hands does that count as a 6 ball double cascade?
Very nice - I am disappointed with the results, not the analysis, but will still try "a" four ball cascade. Thanks so much very entertaining and enlightening video.
amazing analysis
I think the point of the challenge is to use only two manipulators. I liked one of the patterns you did that almost satisfied the criteria. Very entertaining skills though.
14:26 He said four but held five in his hand
Yea XDDD
What about throwing it lower though?
Very interesting, we clearly feel the research you did there. Great job!
This is gonna sound stupid but can’t you just do the hand motions for a 5 ball cascade but take out a ball and it would be a 4 ball cascade?
The rhyme would be wrong
A three ball cascade goes:
1,2,3
A four ball fountain a-sync:
1,2,3,4
Five ball obviously being:
1,2,3,4,5
Five ball with only four ball is:
1,2,3,4,0 which leaves an odd beat
I love this type of video 👍
I like "cheating" with 5 or 6 balls.Like doing a cascade,throwing 1 ball at a time,and after 3 balls crossing the last two using the lower parts of palms.Or 4/5/6 balls shower,where all are thrown,but you "skip" and "boost" by doing 1s with several balls at the same time.It makes the shower much slower and easier.But it is multiplexing,because 1)a ball lands on top of another ball held in palm 2)more than one ball is held at the same time
So,they use [22]
It is like "golden mechanic rule".You bow the diagram,winning in one dimension,but losing in the other.
The even number cascade is impossible because of assymmetry or antiparity of the time and ball spaces.You have to eather not change hands or do synch throws OR "cheat" by temporary holding more one ball or let them land on top of another to "win" some time.OR throw them different heights or put hands or different heights.
The MAIN difference between 3 and 5 ball cascades is that the second one DOES NOT have balls crossing at their highest points.So it is a bit of guessing,aiming and counting.
When you say "No ball can have a unique role in the cascade", does that mean the siteswap must be a single number?
If it wasn't a single number (or reducible to a single number), then you could have 2 different numbers, and thus 2 different balls doing different things.
Applying the rule that average of all the digits of a siteswap is the number of balls in the pattern, any siteswap for a 4 ball cascade would have to be '4'.
Now we need to prove whether or not such a siteswap is jugglable.
Mind blown 🤯
Fascinating!
Does anyone know where I can buy some of those balls, he juggles?
I'm a beginner and looks easier to juggle with that type of balls.
Thanks you!!
you can make your own easy
czcams.com/video/SyfxIryiD8A/video.html
the weight of a juggling ball is between 90-130g.
You can even fill it with rice. After I made my own, my skills jumped rapidly compared to the tennis balls. Use easily inflatable balloons, because some are tight and will have a higher chance to break.
If someone asked me to do a 4 ball cascade I'd just do asynchronous crosses
What about a sprung cascade
15:02 What is this app? Anybody?
Short answer:
No
thumb up for busting out the dsss
Dizzier than my math classes
my personal definition was always: same height, asynchronous, two hands, inside crossing... so what about this pattern? czcams.com/video/r6NabbqzlDw/video.html
yes, there are different hand movements and ist`s the sideswap 4, but I would say that this is a cascade
I'd say this is a mills mess variation that happens to look like a 4 ball cascade, not a cascade. It depends if you think "balls have to cross" means "cross to the other side of the pattern" or "cross to the other hand".
Yes and I would call this more a cascade than adding a third hand.
The siteswap that video is 4.
amazing research that shows that there is a lot of research in the juggling world!
where do you get those balls
@Choko The Great noice
When will be a four balls CASCADE TUTORIAL ????
Can't be!
@@aquario3563 ... I didnt understand You
@@user-lu7ib8ce7d idk anymore what I wanted to say, I don't understand past me either
You are so hyper active, why? slow blood, Mr.