Nash Equilibrium in Hindi
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- This video is an extracted part of the original video, Game Theory. As the game theory is a long video, and a student wants to see the Nash Equilibrium only, he needs to watch the entire video. Keeping this issue in the mind I have extracted the portion of Nash equilibrium from the main video and make a separate video as Nash Equilibrium in Hindi.
𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 / 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 Contact 𝗮𝘁: mgtclasses2018@gmail.com
You can also visit us at:
www.management...
/ mgtclasses
/ managementclasses
/ managementclas1
/ mgtclass
Came here after biography of John Nash beautiful mind
Same here 🤘
Same here 🔥
Me to
Same Here boss
Smm here
That is really an awesome video ..He tried to explain Nash Equilibrium in some simple words it was really great
Thanks a lot 😊
came here after watching beautiful mind on Netflix which is based on Nash mathamatician
Thanks for explaining
Thank sir for making economics consepts easier
he was not mathematician, he was economicts but un ko nobal pfice mathes department na dya tha bcz maths waly equilibrium main phans gy tby un sa solve nahi ho raha tha then un ko nash k phd thesis ka pata chala k is bandy ka kam is topic pa they come to meet him and find the solution that's why they presented him nobal price. and sir nash is equilibrium ko find krty krtu mental ho gy thy
Great explanation ❤
Thanks sir
If both companies decide not to build the plant and assuming perfect information....why is 18|18 not nash equilibrium....are there two nash equilibrium?
If market has high demand obviously either company will want to maximise his profit. So if one company decides not to build automatically other will try to maximise profit and build new. So there is no question of not building a new plant.
Yes Sir!! This video is helpful!!!
Very excellent presentation.
Thanks for watching
Starts 1 :45, for Nash, watch or read beautiful mind
Badi tez ho betaaaa 😜😜
lol me science student hu management sikh rha hu
Thanks Jay 😊. I will be more than happy, if I could be of any help to you
Very good explanation sir
Great lecture.. bahut achhe se bataya n thanx
Thanks a lot 😊
میں پاکستان سے ہو اور میں نے بہت زیادہ ایکنامکس اپ سے سیکھ لیا ۔اللہ اپ کو کامیاب کریں۔
Ameen. Many thanks dear
Thank you so much. I'm really grateful.
Thanks shakil
Very informative
Sir thank you alottt apke lctr na hoty pta ni m kya krti 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺love you a lot sir ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Thank u so much savera. Mera kuch nhi he, ye apki apni mehnat he jo samajh men aaraha he.
great explaination sir
Happy 😊
Sir agar 3 or usse jyada company involved ho to Nash equilibrium se kaise best outcome mil sakta hain...??..and agar Nash equilibrium ko follow karke koi company built karte hai fir year by year uske loss ho jata hain to fir kiya Nash equilibrium Kam karega ??...sir kindly response..thank you
Is men hota ye he ek company jab decision leti he to wo aur ek ya ek se zyada company hoti hen unke decisions ko samne rakh kar apna best decision leti he. Wo aisa decision hota he ki usse best wo koj aur decision le hi nhi sakti
It was a nice video with the given examples. But it is still hard to understand what he is trying to deliver. But if you choose simple words and also an simple example it would be much better instead just giving an company example & you can also put a simpler example like how we create an equilibrium if you are in a situation to how to apply it. Then that kind of video would be very grateful. But the video is ok.
Thank you so much dear Malik. Surely i will take care of your valuable advice in my proceeding video.
Sir I have a question
If we follow the pay off matrix, equilibrium should be in the condition when both Honda and Toyota earns 18 million dollar profit as it is the first highest utility
Whereas in the grid of 16 million dollar profit is 2nd highest utility
So my question is how nash equilibrium is in the grid of 16 million dollars profit
I felt the same, may be wrote wrong values for 4th grid, both values should have been less than 15
Thank you sir
Sir I have a question kindly do reply,there is multiple choice question which state's.. In nash equilibrium a player (a)deivate form his strategy(b) does not deivate (c)none of these.. But I didn't found the answer form this video of yours, will you please help?
Sorry for late reply
In nash equilibrium producer do not find any incentives to deviate from his strategy.
Nice explanation
great method of delivering and explaining
Thanks a lot dear
zbardst Sir
Thanks for liking
👍👍
Informative ❤️❤️
Lot of thanks 😊
What an explanation !!! (y)
Sir plz make some videos on public finance for +3 economic plz sir
Okay soon
Nice video 🙏
Great 👌
sir 18 18 vaala nash equilibrium ku nhi h sirf 16 16 vaala hi ku
Sir plz make the video of natural monopoly
Ok
Sir ek video nudge theory pr v banaye.. thanx again
Sure
Good job sir ...keep it up
Thanks, Sir!
Woow just woow♥️
superb theory...thank u. sir...
Lot of Thanks Dear.
czcams.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos
Nice sir
Thanks sir✨
Sir what about 18/18
sir i have just one doubt in the last portion where there is non-nash equilibrium where honda is sure that toyata wont make the plant, so honda decides to make it in order to gain 20millon, but toyota after seeing honda making bigger profit and his own 15 million (less profit) chooses to make plant as well.. You said honda will come in worst situation but.. i am not understanding where is the loss of honda, even if toyota changes its decision later they still will land on 16-16 million profit..
Bcoz Honda was getting 20 where Toyota wasn't making the plant
So h = 20 , t = 15
But now Toyota decides to make and Honda was also building it ..
So h = 16 , t = 16
So if u see Honda had a loss of 4 m and Toyota gained 1 m..
H = 20 T = 15
H = 16 T = 16
So this is why .. if u have doubt u can ask me
Thank you sir. 🙏
Well explained
osm
pasand ayi sir , thanks
Thank you Hemant
Bhai saab agar plant bana kr dono 16 mn le rhe hai or nhi bana kr 18 mn ka profit h....to plant banana hi kyu hai?
dosra nahi banaye ka risk hai na, risk liya to 15 tak kam bhi ho sakta hai
naaash equilibruin ;)
sir please upload video mixed strategy nash equilibrium with 2 players...........
Player 2
Rock Paper Scissors
player 1 Rock 0,0 -1,1 1,-1
Paper 1,-1 0,0 -1,1
Scissors 1,-1 1,-1 0,0
any pure strategy Nash equilibrium in this game ? Find out the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
Ok soon
Thank you so much
Thanks
#
Anyone from movie??
Good job sir
Thanks
Why no explanation regarding 18,18 🤷
Thanks sir mai yah Nahi samajh pa rahi thi
most welcome
Sir can you please make a video on mixed strarety please 🥺😭
Will try Amber
@@DrNavedClasses thankyou soo mch sir...your videos makes my life so easy...It helps me to understand the concept in the most easiest manner...
Very clear and nice explanation sir
Lot of thanks 😊
Es theory se aadmi ko kya benefits hua?
👍
Sir kise ques mey doubt hoo to kha se puche
Write me on mgtclasses2018@gmail.com
@@DrNavedClasses thanku sir
Greetings sir🙏🙏Would collusion work in this case??
Collusion is different, where all the firms act like monopolist
@@DrNavedClassesThanks for reply sir😊😊 Can Honda and Toyota perform collusion in above example?? What happens if they perform collusion?? Plz reply sir🙏🙏
Confusing
Confuse e kr diya sir aapne to
Sorry dear Maninder. Is there any way I can clear your confusion? I will be more than happy. 😊
Why don't you explain nash equilibrium by its original prisoners example than apply to this example...
It will surely help students to get the idea behind
Don't mention
sir I saw all videos. please uploaded stackelberg model.
sure will try to make soon Kamal
I don't understand how profit is 18 million when plant is not built. And profit is only 16 when plant is built. Something is wrong in the question.
Yes , if any single one deviates both parties get loss ( equill...) ..which doesn't happens in example ..
I guess , example taken is not right , as...if any player deviates from nash equilibrium , then both of the playes suffer loss ....which is not the case of ur example
I will recheck it dear. thanks for the information
Sir ...aapka naam kya h?
Chemical equilibrium lean to be me so lean to be Nash equilibrium is that important
16-16 and 18-18 must be inverted.
Work on sound
😀 mic already changed
Confused explaination
18, 18 kyu nhi huyi?
sir agar apka video pehle dekh leti toh main pass ho jati.. pity meh!
I am sorry Priya. But dont loose hope. start study again I am sure you will get success.
Thank you sir
Most welcome