2021 Ford Bronco Badlands - MPG Test [7MT, Badlands, 4-door]
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- The Ford Bronco comes in all sorts of configurations, but four doors and a manual is how to optimize both fun and practicality. What sort of fuel economy can you expect with that package?
Got a ticket? Use Off the Record to get your ticket dropped! Code "Daily Motor" to support the channel! off-the-record...
Become a DM Member and get access to special content including custom sound tests and vehicle requests!
/ @dailymotor
Sound-system test: • 2021 Ford Bronco - B&O...
Full review: • 2021 Ford Bronco Badla...
We use a Grizzl-E 240V charger for our home EV charging, and you should too! grizzl-e.com/p...
Please hit that subscribe button if you enjoy! If you have any questions on the car or any cars you'd like to see, let us know in the comments.
Check out our website for written reviews and content: thedailymotor.com
Intro music and graphics by Skyler Benn.
This video was filmed with in-ear, binaural microphones, so if you listen with headphones, it will sound like you're sitting in the driver's seat!
#bronco #mpg #fueleconomy
![2021 Ford Bronco Badlands [2.3L, 7MT, 4-Door] - DM Test Drive | Review](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5czgLzjBuMQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![2021 Ford Bronco Badlands [2.3L, 7MT, 4-Door] – DM Test Drive | Review](/img/tr.png)
The gas tank size on the 4 door is 20.8 gallons. The 2 door is 16.9 gallons
I love that the stock Badlands is perfect for most respectable off roading/overlanding most will ever do. 33s are like the ideal combo for off road and daily driver IMO
And 35's fit on a stock Badlands!
D.M. Let's hope FoMoCo shares the Bronco's manual transmission with other suitable platforms like the Ranger and F-150.
Ford and most others are going fully electric soon. By 2025 mid transition, by 2030 fully electric.
@@trucker_rob no they are not Ford just announced the will be building gas engines for a long time. And if all cars are evs it will destroy the car market. Like who's going to upgrade their electric car. It would be pointless.
Sure--a gearbox that is slower, used more fuel, and a pain to drive in traffic.....what a pick. The V-6 10 speed is quicker and actually gets BETTER gas mileage than this turd setup.
@@Jv19979 people upgrade / trade in their Teslas all the time because they want the newest one. So “ that would kill the market “ is wrong.
@@trucker_rob name one upgrade. Putting wheels or a tune on a electric vehicle is stupid
The 2 door badlands manual with 33s would be perfect for me!
not with this engine
@@chadhaire1711 is the 2.3 a dog?
@@carperdiem8754 It depends.....this is a light duty motor not made to spin large 33 inch tires, it has to work too hard to pull the heavy Bronco as it is with smaller tires.....the fuel economy of the 2.3 and larger 2.7 335 hp unit is the same at 19 mpg highway--in fact the larger 2.7 usually does better because it is less strained. Plus if you get the 7-speed manual it drinks even more gas. If you get the 2.3 you should get the 10-speed auto with more gears the 2.3 will need. Only reason to get the 2.3 with 7-speed manual is low purchase price, but if you are going to live with this truck for 4-6 years, why suffer lousy performance and gas mileage that is no better to save a few bucks? See my youtube video on the Bronco.
@@chadhaire1711 I guess my standards are low because my current offroader is a Suzuki Sidekick with no power on 29s
@@chadhaire1711 wrong. 2.3 makes plenty of power. Also, the manual gets better MPG then the 2.7
Thank you for this video, few people actually test vehicles like the bronco or jeep for highway use, my wrangler had 32in tires on it and I never took it off road, people should experience how meditative a day of driving with the top and doors off in great weather,
A tank out in any direction and a tank back.
So much better than the Wrangler
Perfect spec. The Sasquatch is too ridiculous for me and I hate super sized wheels and tires, they tend to really impact the drive negatively
False
No they do not--you have not driven one
Sasquatch comes with 35's. Not a ridiculous tire size and it actually drives smooth down the road.
Hmmm I’m curious how this would compare with a manual V6 Wrangler. I don’t doubt this has more low-end torque and a better feeling manual than the Wrangler, but personally I much prefer NA power delivery, especially in the case of an NA V6 vs. a turbo 4 cylinder.
The 2.3 has more power and the power kicks is a lot lower rpm. The jeeps V6 you have to have it basically reved out.
Ok. Not bad. Love the Bronco. But where are these gas prices going? Ouch.
If you voted Democrat you have no right to bitch
@@chadhaire1711 LMAO it has nothing to do with Democrats
Can you turn the adaptive cruise off, completely?
Yes
I'm surprised that a vehicle of this size in has a 16 gallon fuel tank 😳
Only 1.5 gallon more than my '12 Jetta! Lol. Bronco should probably have an 18-20 gal tank.
@@lukeheffernan my 2014 Honda Accord holds 17.2
@@gladdy02 Exactly…300 miles of HIGHWAY range isn’t great IMO. Means you’re probably only going to get 150-200 in city driving.
That’s only the 2 door, 4 door has a 20.8 gallon tank.
@@budapest1002 that's make more sense
I don’t know why, but it bothers me when people say it’s a 7 speed manual. It’s a 6 with a crawl gear. No one uses the crawl gear on the streets.
True, it's just fun to say
🤣🤣
These numbers car crap. I already have tested the Badlands with 35 inch tires and large V-6 ecoboost and 10-speed and got 19/20 mpg at 80 mph....same numbers here....and 70 mph would be even better. This 2,3 engine is too small for this SUV and offers NOTHING.
I'd bet everything I got you didn't get 19/20mpg in ANY bronco config with 35" tires going an average of 80mph.
@@sean9267 Bring your stuff Goober--I will take you for everything you got.....and I posted my results on youtube----better watch that video before you look even sillier.
@@chadhaire1711 not another soul has been able to replicate your claims. You must be going downhill.
@@sean9267 Unlike others who test drive for a few hours I drive an entire week Goober. The Bronco is still in the warehouse kid.....bring $4,000 cash and we will see who wins the bet.....I will film it all on you tube.
And next time use your REAL NAME...I dont deal with trolls who hide behind fake names.......which does not say much about you to start with....
@@chadhaire1711 You already uploaded a video showing it getting 18.5mpg going 75-80mph. Either way, your own video proves you wrong @ 10:00;
czcams.com/video/_TXd69aD5mI/video.html
I'll take that $4,000 via Paypal or Venmo.
330 miles is...uh..terrible.
Buy something else if you not happy with it.
it's...uh...comparable to a Wrangler...uh...
It’s more like 400. The fuel tank is actually 20.8 gallons not 16.9. The 2 door is 16.9 and the 4 door is 20.8
8:31 cringe
Why is that cringe?
Totally absurd video. Highway speed should be 75 mph, not 70. Also these tires are too big for this engine. The V-6 badlands with same large tires gets 18/19 mpg at 75 mph+. The Bronco Raptor gets 18 at 75 mph. Zero advantage to get the tiny 2.3 engine in a Bronco unless you get smaller tires. That manual gearbox gets worse mileage than the 10--speed too. Cheapskate should have gone with V-6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!