Why 40,000 People Die for Every 1% Increase in Unemployment - The Big Short

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 07. 2020
  • the big short was a fantastic movie, for finance nerds and regular viewers alike. One of the lines that stood out the most, amongst many memorable lines, was the claim that for every 1% increase in unemployment 40,000 people die.
    This is an incredibly significant claim, that adds even more weight to the already significant societal issues that come along with people out of the job.
    So is this claim actually true?
    This video was made possible by our Patreon community! ❤️
    See new videos early, participate in exclusive Q&As, and more!
    ➡️ / economicsexplained
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    #bigshort #unemployment #economics
    Enjoyed the video? Comment below! 💬
    ⭑ Subscribe to Economics Explained 👉 bit.ly/sub2ee
    ⭑ Enjoyed? Hit the like button! 👍
    Q&A Streams on EEII (2nd channel) → / @economicsisepic
    ✉️ Business Enquiries → hello@economicsexplained.com
    Follow EE on social media:
    Twitter 🐦 → / economicsex
    Facebook → / economicsex
    Instagram → / economicsexplainedoffical
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    EE Fan Exclusive Offer:
    Sign-up for Acorns! 👉 www.acorns.com/ee (after registration, Acorns will deposit $5 in your account to help you get started with investing!)
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    ECONOMICS EXPLAINED IS MADE POSSIBLE BY OUR PATREON COMMUNITY 👊🙏
    Support EE by becoming a Patron today! 👉 / economicsexplained
    The video you’re watching right now would not exist without the monthly support provided by our generous Patrons:

Komentáře • 1,2K

  • @EconomicsExplained
    @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +154

    Thanks as always for watching :D This video was requested by the team over on Patreon. If you want to have your say on what video is produced next please consider supporting the channel.
    www.patreon.com/EconomicsExplained

    • @numanh8391
      @numanh8391 Před 3 lety +2

      He also said
      “ You said you wanted to be rich
      Now your rich “

    • @henrygustav7948
      @henrygustav7948 Před 3 lety +2

      When the federal reserve raises interest rates they are trying to keep inflation under control by increasing unemployment according to what they think is the natural rate of unemployment(Nairu). In essence, they are causing unemployment which results mass deaths to contain non existent inflation. We desperately need fiscal policy instead of monetary policy to just completely end involuntary unemployment via a Jobs guarantee program, a public option for jobs. Full employment is ultimately the responsibility of the federal govt as it is taxes that create unemployment, a condition in which you need to sell your labor or products in order to attain a currency that only the US issues. If there is unemployment then that is a sign that the US has not spent enough money into the economy to generate full employment. The private sector will never do it because labor is a cost and it doesn't make sense to hire someone unless they know it will result in overall profit. That is why it must be the federal govt's responsibility, because they tax us creating unemployment, and the private sector system is set up in such a way that they will never hire 100% of the people who want to work.

    • @thomasridley8675
      @thomasridley8675 Před 3 lety

      @@henrygustav7948
      While that is true. I'm not sure there is a better way.
      We haven't had another great depression. So that's good.
      I went disabled retirement 35 yrs ago. But everyone I know has a job. Some even have reasonably good paying jobs for my area.

    • @SxyRikku
      @SxyRikku Před 3 lety

      I was wondering how much government hand outs increase the number drug/substances abuse. I wonder how many people have died from suicide or drug overdoses compared to the covid 19.

    • @henrygustav7948
      @henrygustav7948 Před 3 lety +1

      @@thomasridley8675There is, the Federal jobs guarantee program proposed by MMT economists would replace monetary policy with fiscal policy. Its an automatic stabilizer the way it is set up to prevent long term unemployment, prevent people leaving the workforce involuntarily. It maximizes employment while also controlling for inflation because when the economy picks up, people leave the program for better private sector jobs. The Great depression is coming in a few months if not already here with 40 million people unemployed last I heard. Many of those jobs are not coming back. Everyone you know may have a job but look around you, restaurants and so many other businesses have closed up with no signs of help coming from the federal govt. We are going to be in deeper trouble.

  • @latvia1
    @latvia1 Před 3 lety +1927

    Liechtenstein: *hits 1% unemployment rate*
    All of Liechtenstein: Adios

    • @lightzpy8049
      @lightzpy8049 Před 3 lety +42

      median income AAA+

    • @RERM001
      @RERM001 Před 3 lety +9

      nichts ist für dich
      nichts war für dich
      nichts bleibt für dich
      ... für immer

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 Před 3 lety +7

      Isn't Lichtenstein a tax haven for rich Europeans?

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 Před 3 lety +22

      I checked and you're right: less than 39,000 persons.

    • @theemptylegend0
      @theemptylegend0 Před 3 lety +43

      So if 400 people lose their jobs everyone dies? That’s tough

  • @LucasDimoveo
    @LucasDimoveo Před 3 lety +558

    I got fired from a decent paying ($40K ish a year) job and my family didn't quite recover until 3 years later. Right after that my wife got pneumonia, which caused some hefty medical medical bills. We even lived in a van with our one year old for a few months, which eventually helped us start saving again. We moved into an apartment right before Covid hit.

    • @Re3iRtH
      @Re3iRtH Před 3 lety +109

      Best of luck to you my friend

    • @glendakillough6726
      @glendakillough6726 Před 3 lety +79

      Father, pour prosperity upon this man, give him supernatural intervention at every turn. In Jesus name I pray, Amen.

    • @Sagittarius-A-Star
      @Sagittarius-A-Star Před 3 lety +31

      Sounds like hel... - I mean US.
      I guess for that you can thank the jerks and their lawyers who sued every doctor for staining their shirt with blood for one gadzillion of compensation while saving their life through an emergency heart surgery.

    • @mcfrosty8739
      @mcfrosty8739 Před 3 lety +23

      @@glendakillough6726 Yes Jebus, rain golden coins from the sky using your fictional mystical powers!

    • @Lewis-ft6dl
      @Lewis-ft6dl Před 3 lety +3

      What you get fired for?

  • @duo496
    @duo496 Před 3 lety +604

    Economics of a hostage situation

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +301

      you are beginning to worry me bro.

    • @flavioaugustojose
      @flavioaugustojose Před 3 lety +38

      "Never split the difference" by Chris Voss gives a good idea of the economics of hostage situations

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 Před 3 lety +13

      @@EconomicsExplained *Just Do it! You can do it! We believe in you!*

    • @lorenzoeli2939
      @lorenzoeli2939 Před 3 lety +13

      @@EconomicsExplained please do private vs public ownership

    • @tyronemarchant2589
      @tyronemarchant2589 Před 3 lety

      It would turn into the trolley dilemma

  • @EconomicsExplained
    @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +738

    Last time I was this early, there was money to be made shorting housing bonds.

  • @pary8245
    @pary8245 Před 3 lety +797

    If the unemployment rate grows from 3.5% to 15% it is not an 11% increase but rather 428%

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +296

      haha well I suppose you are correct.

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 Před 3 lety +274

      oh god, dont even get started on that statistical quirk.
      i guess it would be more accurate to say it increased by 11 percentage points.

    • @mrmeseeks8790
      @mrmeseeks8790 Před 3 lety +6

      😁

    • @mattbowdenuh
      @mattbowdenuh Před 3 lety +10

      gotta love statistics :P

    • @mrashford122
      @mrashford122 Před 3 lety +45

      👏🏼👏🏼 it’s not a proper economics channel. I also take upbridge with them implying that 600,000 “corona” deaths are causing the joblessness. It was definitely the government shutting the economy that caused the sharp increase in jobless claims. P R O P A G A N D A

  • @JFHWM
    @JFHWM Před 3 lety +854

    Shouldn't the big short just meet half way at The medium medium ?

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +284

      I hate you.

    • @swastickpaliwal6105
      @swastickpaliwal6105 Před 3 lety +11

      @@EconomicsExplained ROASTED lol

    • @cccspwn
      @cccspwn Před 3 lety +18

      Medium medium could be translated into A short straddle. An options strategy comprised of selling both a call option and a put option with the same strike price and expiration date. It is used when the trader believes the underlying asset will not move significantly higher or lower.
      If you tried this during the housing market crash you would be bankrupt, this is what most banks typically did.

    • @Lesterzen
      @Lesterzen Před 3 lety +2

      I found this really funny ... lol

    • @dhk7986
      @dhk7986 Před 3 lety +2

      @@EconomicsExplained You were my brother, @Economics Explained. I loved you.

  • @pushkarlakhe13
    @pushkarlakhe13 Před 3 lety +706

    " If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature but by our institutions , great is our sin ! " - Charles Darwin

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 Před 3 lety +13

      Charles of all people?

    • @emiliolocura2
      @emiliolocura2 Před 3 lety +94

      @@geradosolusyon511 To be fair, societal Darwinism is a terrible misunderstanding of his theories...

    • @julien344
      @julien344 Před 3 lety +1

      Do you know how high was the life expectancy in industrial areas at Darwin's time ?

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 Před 3 lety +5

      @@julien344 no, please tell us.

    • @bigboyman5743
      @bigboyman5743 Před 3 lety +18

      "There are people who believe in fake quotes"
      -Stephen Hawking

  • @themongolsarecoming_9437
    @themongolsarecoming_9437 Před 3 lety +289

    15 percent unemployment.
    "A'IGHT IM'MA HEAD OUT."
    -400,000 people,circa 2020

    • @theledal
      @theledal Před 3 lety +33

      *600,000

    • @johnl.7754
      @johnl.7754 Před 3 lety

      Well the increased unemployment & stimulus checks should counteract that

    • @georgechristiansen6785
      @georgechristiansen6785 Před 3 lety +9

      The finacial impact is only one small factor in why unemployment kills.

    • @ellengran6814
      @ellengran6814 Před 3 lety +2

      Today 80.000 a year opium. Add alcohol and health attack. If those 80.000 are related to the 2000 economic crash - the numbers next decade will be far worse because the unemployment numbers this time are far worse.

    • @thijsjong
      @thijsjong Před 3 lety

      Asuming it is linear and not exponential.

  • @masterofpureawesome
    @masterofpureawesome Před 3 lety +344

    Las time I was this early I was employed...

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +70

      :(

    • @varimatra2088
      @varimatra2088 Před 3 lety +4

      For the reason i whas never so early i feel you

    • @jayjay3013
      @jayjay3013 Před 3 lety

      masterofpureawesome lol

    • @CarFreeSegnitz
      @CarFreeSegnitz Před 3 lety +4

      Last time I was this early employment/unemployment was a foreign concept because everyone hunted or gathered.

    • @theYoutubeHandle
      @theYoutubeHandle Před 3 lety +1

      maybe that's why you got fired, watching youtube instead of working

  • @ALC0LITE
    @ALC0LITE Před 3 lety +718

    This video makes me glad I live in Australia.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +211

      yeyeye we'll be right mate.

    • @themongolsarecoming_9437
      @themongolsarecoming_9437 Před 3 lety +42

      One of the very few things that can make you want to Iive in Ailartsua.

    • @alisterfabian9991
      @alisterfabian9991 Před 3 lety +7

      @@themongolsarecoming_9437 Buggering upside down

    • @mustluvbears91
      @mustluvbears91 Před 3 lety +3

      Up the Knights!

    • @Marvin-ii7bh
      @Marvin-ii7bh Před 3 lety +46

      @Rajeev Vij laughs in germany. we still have less than 3 million people unemployed thanks to the good reaction of our government to the crisis

  • @johnlocke4695
    @johnlocke4695 Před 3 lety +35

    *me graduated in 2020*
    Interviewer: stay home stay safe

    • @alrizo1115
      @alrizo1115 Před 3 lety +4

      if you have school debt, then you are unlucky.

  • @InvestorCenter
    @InvestorCenter Před 3 lety +311

    *Unemployment rate is 15%
    Well this isn’t good...

    • @kairon156
      @kairon156 Před 3 lety +6

      That's pretty much the norm for Newfoundland. Although it was hanging around 12% for a few years which were okay for our island.

    • @davecullins1606
      @davecullins1606 Před 3 lety +4

      The undertaker's cash register goes *_BBBRRRRRRRRRR_*

    • @jameseasson4489
      @jameseasson4489 Před 3 lety +28

      Laughs in south african with unemployment rate of 29 percent before the recession

    • @InvestorCenter
      @InvestorCenter Před 3 lety +2

      James Easson man I didn’t know it was that bad there!

    • @correctionguy7632
      @correctionguy7632 Před 3 lety +4

      @@kairon156 smh norway should just colonize it already

  • @Krakondack
    @Krakondack Před 3 lety +47

    "Cheer up, you're not structurally unemployed. You're cyclically unemployed. We think jobs will eventually come back. One day."

  • @DoomTrooper90
    @DoomTrooper90 Před 3 lety +259

    Short answer - No.
    Long Answer - Yes and No. It's affected by economic conditions on the ground that are far more complex.
    For all that, it's still a terrible thing if people can't get back to work because there's not much work left to begin with, or the work that is available doesn't pay enough for even basic subsistence.
    Nice video!

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +41

      haha yeah the TLDR

    • @DKTrue
      @DKTrue Před 3 lety +1

      Economics Explained I guess this is a TLDW 😂

    • @quack3891
      @quack3891 Před 3 lety

      @@DKTrue TLDWOR
      too long, didn't watch or read ;)

  • @wahlex841
    @wahlex841 Před 3 lety +12

    As someone who was unemployed more than once in my life, I absolutely can imagine how widespread layoffs contributes to a heightened death toll.

  • @appleslover
    @appleslover Před 3 lety +145

    Bold of you to assume that I have a job.
    Wait..

  • @tshepangt88
    @tshepangt88 Před 3 lety +9

    South Africa has a total of 7.01 million people who are unemployment which is roughly 30.1% Q1 of the population. And this was before Corona hit the country. This is a very scary time for recent graduates.

  • @theYoutubeHandle
    @theYoutubeHandle Před 3 lety +94

    a country with 100 people, 1 guy loses job
    everyone else: intense sweating

    • @infidelheretic923
      @infidelheretic923 Před 3 lety +1

      What country would that be?
      The Vatican City?

    • @theYoutubeHandle
      @theYoutubeHandle Před 3 lety +1

      @@infidelheretic923 I don't know. Why don't you google it?

    • @deanjordan6053
      @deanjordan6053 Před 3 lety +2

      @@infidelheretic923 The Vatican has a population of 1,000.

  • @MeHungy136
    @MeHungy136 Před 3 lety +40

    Please make a video on what would happen to the economy if everyone over 70 died! I threw out this what if at a new year party last year ... and now I want to know what kind of future I've doomed us to.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +20

      ooh, interesting I explored something similar in the video about what a thanos snap would do to the economy. I imagine a lot of the points there would still hold true in your hypothetical.

    • @jornoel7034
      @jornoel7034 Před 3 lety +6

      There would be a surplus in retiremnt funds which ould account to increase of pensions which could lead to retirement funds being exposed as pyramid schemes

    • @Croz89
      @Croz89 Před 3 lety

      So the economics of Logan's Run with a bit of an age bump.

    • @MeHungy136
      @MeHungy136 Před 3 lety

      Well I just want to explore the impacts of mass amounts of wealth shifting down a generation and the impacts on the aged care industry. Impacts on healthcare costs. It's a pretty interesting and complex picture. Would it be good in the long run?

    • @benishborogove2692
      @benishborogove2692 Před 3 lety

      @@MeHungy136 The mass amounts of wealth will be disappointingly small as much has already been concentrated at the top. Healthcare will continue to nibble away at what's left.

  • @hanzup4117
    @hanzup4117 Před 3 lety +401

    Ermm why are the auto-generated subtitles only available in Korean? Does YT have trouble understanding your accent, EE? Lol 😂

  • @Benben-sx6ei
    @Benben-sx6ei Před 3 lety +20

    I think you forgot to mention that healthcare is often tied to our employment, and we are in the middle of a booming pandemic. Tens of thousands of people are finding themselves high and dry with way to seek medical care when they get sick. This is resulting many more deaths than we would otherwise have.

    • @dragonx23123
      @dragonx23123 Před 3 lety +2

      2:36

    • @alexcarter8807
      @alexcarter8807 Před 3 lety +3

      Yep health care is nearly impossible to get if you're not employed in the US. If you're employed, *some* of the time, you get health care. You probably can't afford to use it, but there's a chance. And don't get seriously sick at all, or you'll lose your job, house, family, everything. Learn to build guillotines now and avoid the rush.

    • @HenryPaulThe3rd
      @HenryPaulThe3rd Před 3 lety

      You’ve probably never heard of EMTALA, Medicare, or Medicaid.

    • @benishborogove2692
      @benishborogove2692 Před 3 lety

      @@HenryPaulThe3rd I think you had to be on welfare to get medicaid and you had to not get any job offers (not even any without health ins) to stay on welfare. So it would be possible not to qualify.

    • @HenryPaulThe3rd
      @HenryPaulThe3rd Před 3 lety

      benish borogove Maybe so. I know with EMTALA anyone who comes to the emergency room must be treated regardless of ability to pay, and regardless of their insurance status

  • @adrianodangelo2188
    @adrianodangelo2188 Před 3 lety +11

    love this explanation! I think there's a couple of interesting additional points to take on board:
    1) Brad Pitt's character is a pessimistic and paranoid individual after years of working in the financial markets. While he's probably a really bright guy, that quote does as much to reinforce his "seeds are the new currency" mindset as much as it serves to ground the viewer in realizing it's not just about numbers.
    2) I think it would be interesting to at the worldwide economic effect of the crisis. I'm from Canada and people definitely felt the impact. I wonder if the figure he quotes would be more accurate if considered worldwide.

  • @Udenhoved
    @Udenhoved Před 3 lety +32

    Actually, the low structural unemployment in Denmark is a product of the danish flexicurity labour model, in which the labour market has flexibility (it is easy to dismiss and hire workers) and the workers get social security.

    • @dexzero
      @dexzero Před 3 lety +5

      flexicurity , i like this word.

    • @pwnmeisterage
      @pwnmeisterage Před 3 lety +4

      Canada nominally has something similar. But the reality is that "Employment Insurance" pays too little and too late to sustain the same lifestyle.

  • @notnothaze
    @notnothaze Před 3 lety +3

    Love the video! I was never interested in economics however I discovered your videos during quarantine and I've learned a lot and it has gotten me much more interested in economics. Keep up the great work!

  • @joaquincimas500
    @joaquincimas500 Před 3 lety +87

    Wait a minute. Spain have a 26% unemployment in 2013. That means I'm dead since 2013??🧐🤔🤔

  • @johnbrule7152
    @johnbrule7152 Před 3 lety +4

    I actually did my final paper for my Political Economy class on this (which was at the end of April, during the height of COVID here) but I used a different study to find the mortality rate which was done in Canada. I found the increased mortality rate significant enough to deter drastic actions which caused unemployment.

  • @nithinsingh2000
    @nithinsingh2000 Před 3 lety +59

    What a coincidence I was just watching this movie and thinking about the exact line 🍻

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +11

      haha it was meant to be! Great Flick for sure

    • @raajpatel9198
      @raajpatel9198 Před 3 lety

      Movie name?

    • @songsantov
      @songsantov Před 3 lety

      Yes. Google and CZcams know everything you do and everything you thinking about. 😈😅

    • @godlies9257
      @godlies9257 Před 3 lety

      ꧁꧂ (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞𝕤𝕒𝕞𝕖⚢𓃟✔︎☻︎❤︎(ง'̀-'́)ง(❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

    • @raajpatel9198
      @raajpatel9198 Před 3 lety

      @An Vode thanks

  • @barrybrevik9178
    @barrybrevik9178 Před 3 lety +1

    What a great channel!
    I just discovered it today, and I binge'd several videos. Now, I am subscribed.

  • @thedoruk6324
    @thedoruk6324 Před 3 lety +74

    This was a both *Terrifiying* and Somewhat *Depresing* One ! :s
    37.000 damn! :/

  • @knauz21
    @knauz21 Před 3 lety +17

    Good topic! Been thinking about this quote a lot, especially during the pandemic and seeing nations' different approaches to restrictions and the economic impact of those measures.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +2

      Hopefully I do the topic justice :)

    • @knauz21
      @knauz21 Před 3 lety +1

      @@EconomicsExplained I think you did! I've always taken the quote with a grain of salt obviously, because Hollywood, but never bothered to look into it.

  • @HalfJapMarine
    @HalfJapMarine Před 3 lety +9

    What about all the small businesses that will never open again?

    • @user-wr3vt8uq4s
      @user-wr3vt8uq4s Před 3 lety +1

      Yeah, that's the "death of a thousand cuts" that's not being talked about. Heard stats of 49% of small business in San Francisco have closed and are not likely to ever reopen. Of course places like Amazon and Walmart looooooovvvveee the "consolidation" and their profits are higher now. The Chinese were smart enough to not automate certain jobs simply because it was better for a person to work a job rather than have a robot do it.
      As for the social safety nets, the US is of the mind that we need to support arms mfg'ers and export war as a priority. Raytheon will get their check long before Joe Bloe who's been unemployed in W.VA

    • @HouseFromSmartCity
      @HouseFromSmartCity Před 3 lety +1

      Consolidated. Small biz was squeezed out, with many startup founders having to sell their babies for pennies on the dollar to companies that could afford it ..take a guess who that is. No one wants to talk about it though, among many other things:
      czcams.com/video/7GuhoZDWu-8/video.html

  • @oliverschubert8242
    @oliverschubert8242 Před 3 lety +3

    Yet another high quality video that feeds curiosity and thought in increasing humanities consciousness. Thank you!

  • @dosmastrify
    @dosmastrify Před 3 lety +42

    So 37k in 1981, wouldnt it stand to reason that with population inflation over 30 years the 40k number was accurate if not actually LOW?

    • @s.cookie1136
      @s.cookie1136 Před 3 lety +2

      dosmastrify
      got it :)

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +11

      Yes, if everything else was held true.

    • @dosmastrify
      @dosmastrify Před 3 lety

      @@EconomicsExplained this is true it would depend on everything else all the other assumptions cannot change

    • @evennot
      @evennot Před 3 lety

      There's a correlation between the number of flue deaths (I mean flue) and average winter temperature in warm countries, like Greece where you can't really even freeze to death. Basically, on a large enough sample, some people will go below the point of survival given a slight decrease in the standards of living.
      It's almost impossible to estimate death toll of a particular inconvenience, because society adapts, and consequences manifest themselves in non-straightforward ways. Same goes for viruses. Virus is rarely a sole reason. Combination of health problems (which in turn can be caused by individual/policies) does this thing
      Sadly there are no studies that even try to measure effects of different tactics. They always take only one or two factors, not an aggregate

    • @evennot
      @evennot Před 3 lety

      PS. Regarding studies. The method can go like this:
      1. Take a dozen of societal/individual factors, policy factors and environmental (without naming them).
      2. Take average timestamps with percentages of people affected by policy/environmental factor (i.e virus spread, air quality, etc)/societal factors (unemployment, media and alcohol consumption, etc) during this timestamp + a variable tail to account for delayed effects.
      3. Make simple equations (like perceptron equations) that attributes each factor to death number number using timestamped data.
      4. Run some clustering and orthogonalization algorithms to remove high-entropy factors (which can't be really correlated) and check if the correlations in the source data aren't accidental.
      5. Remove bad data from step 2 based on this analysis.
      6. Run training algorithm until equations from step 3 are producing historically accurate numbers of deaths
      7. Explore attribution of these adjusted equations to find out what's the main culprit. Now you can name factors from step 1, by checking how much weight is assigned in their equation to different events.
      8. Test: run this model for a similar country. Try to train after removing each of the factors (one at a time) to check answer's correctness probability
      It's just a basic Big Data analysis. Someone will do it sooner or later

  • @jegtugado3743
    @jegtugado3743 Před 3 lety +8

    This channel is so educational and informative. I would love to join your patreon once I'm able to do so. Keep up the great content 👍

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety

      Thanks mate, you are always welcome to the content we make, of course Patrons are always appreciated but nobody should ever give anything they cannot!

  • @ItsSam
    @ItsSam Před 3 lety

    Swear that I’ll be thinking about an economic claim or concept and later that week the exact vid is in my recommended.
    Great content, keep it up.

  • @yourewrong264
    @yourewrong264 Před 3 lety +6

    The big short is honestly one of my favorite movies of all time.

  • @seansingh8862
    @seansingh8862 Před 3 lety +3

    I've got simple tastes and I'm pretty sure that I'm in the 1%, which together mean that I genuinely struggle to spend more than about 10% of my income. One of the main reasons why I don't just pack it all in and live out the next four or five decades in leisure is the fact that not working is associated with much higher rates of morbidity. I'd love to be able to get a bit more granularity on some of these statistics so that I can make better informed life-choices.

  • @rikstan15
    @rikstan15 Před 3 lety +5

    The amount of times EE used the "Well yes, but actually no" meme in this video deserves its own statistic

  • @ariavachier-lagravech.6910
    @ariavachier-lagravech.6910 Před 3 lety +41

    Me being a NEET for the past 3 months:"Interesting"

  •  Před 3 lety +6

    Outstanding video!!! I love watching your content. It holds as true for my reality here in Brazil as for yours in Australia. Thank you.

  • @ethribin4188
    @ethribin4188 Před 3 lety +52

    I other words:
    "Every 1% unemployment means 40k people die"
    True, but very inaccurate.

    • @pwnmeisterage
      @pwnmeisterage Před 3 lety

      The "truth" (or "Truth") in these sorts of statements really depends on who pays for the books and studies and figures, and for what purpose.

    • @georgeholloway3981
      @georgeholloway3981 Před 3 lety +6

      I actually think the thrust of this video is that it's a misleadingly simplistic claim, wouldn't you say?

    • @pwnmeisterage
      @pwnmeisterage Před 3 lety +1

      @@georgeholloway3981 It's a generalization based on dubious facts presented in a (biased) study of dated economies. It's also a sensationalist and alarming claim without citing any substance. Bold statements require bold proofs to be taken seriously, anything else is just advertising.

    • @dixonpinfold2582
      @dixonpinfold2582 Před 3 lety +4

      @@georgeholloway3981 I don't know. My takeaway was that it's murky but there appears to be a certain validity to a claim of that nature. So actually it's perhaps your comment that's misleadingly simplistic.

  • @jas2018
    @jas2018 Před 3 lety +8

    I never realized how bad it was here until now. But like everything with Covid, it took what was already terrible and made it a million times worst. Now you have to be under a rock to not be aware of how bad everything is. I just hope our government can restructure and reform fast. If not, the US is going to be an uglier dystopia than it already is.

  • @AA-gl1dr
    @AA-gl1dr Před 3 lety +1

    “please don’t shout at me” is so going in my presentations from now on. excellent video

  • @robotinthebrain
    @robotinthebrain Před 3 lety

    We need more videos like that ! Glad uou raised the topic !

  • @thedavidj1996
    @thedavidj1996 Před 3 lety +16

    You know if the United States had a guaranteed coverage healthcare system and better unemployment benefits then these affects can be pretty much eliminated. When trump says “more people are dying from suicide than from the coronavirus“ well if that’s so then those deaths are also preventable because if these people have access to mental health services, healthcare, and unemployment benefits, then their needs are met and their life doesn’t change much. And in the end it’s not really that we’re talking about unemployment being the cause of death for these people, but really it’s a lack of money to meet their basic needs, be it healthcare, housing, food, etc.

    • @ec8107
      @ec8107 Před 3 lety +4

      Keeping universal benefits to a minimum here in the US keeps people quiet. Shut up and go to work or risk losing everything. The French yellow vest thing doesn't happen here for that reason. It stops being effective when there isn't work to be had (see COVID and "George Floyd" protests).

    • @darthhodges
      @darthhodges Před 3 lety

      The healthcare thing might be relevant but the unemployment is NOT a factor in the U.S. Until the end of July all people receiving unemployment in the U.S. were getting an extra $600 a week on top of what the state they should already be getting. I collected twice as much on unemployment as I got when I was working. I got a new job at the end of July and now that Trump has instituted a $400 unemployment boost (assuming it actually goes into effect) I wish I hadn't. Even though my new employer has a "mandatory overtime" policy (crazy busy online retailer) I still make considerably less working 45 hours a week than the government would be paying me to stay home. The current system is INCENTIVIZING high unemployment.

    • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
      @ThatsMrPencilneck2U Před 3 lety

      @@darthhodges If I had a job that paid that badly and was receiving good unemployment, I'd keep my mouth shut. I couldn't pay my mortgage on this unemployment scheme. Fortunately, I work in pharmaceuticals, and an epidemic just means more product to push.

    • @darthhodges
      @darthhodges Před 3 lety

      @@ThatsMrPencilneck2U People (especially the government) don't realize that $15/hr (full time) is a middle class income (just below the national average) and upper class (assuming you divide into thirds) starts around $45,000/yr. Trying to force such conditions through government spending is how you trash your economy and bankrupt the government (Greece).

    • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
      @ThatsMrPencilneck2U Před 3 lety

      @@darthhodges Nonsense! The minimum wage is whatever your society deems is the least amount a person needs to live on. If you think that living in cardboard box in an alley is just fine, then $7.25/hr is good. In the 1930's, when the Minimum wage was created, the People of the United States decided that a man, working 40/week should be able to buy a house and support a family. The figure $15/hr comes from a relatively simple inflation calculation that compares the Minimum Wage, at it's height in 1968, compared to today and rounded.
      The way you bankrupt your country is make sure every banker gets paid in full. Bankers do not actually produce anything, and, unlike any entity that really does make things, their income growth is exponential. That means, there will never be enough money to pay the banks. This is what happened to Greece. If they owed all their debts in their own money, they could have hosed the bankers, but the EU does what's good for Germany.

  • @zacdillon4311
    @zacdillon4311 Před 3 lety +9

    You are legitimately the only youtuber I have clicked the bell icon for 🤣🤣 as soon as your vids go live or as soon as I wake up in the morning I watch your vids as soon as I can, you have taught me so much and just like Neil de grass Tyson says, you have taught me how to think more scientifically and logically, not mentioning all the crazy fucked up things about how the world economy works that really I don't think I would have known otherwise and the way you put that information into such a well made interesting video should be commended and I really wish you had 10 million more subs and viewers per vid, as the ceo of the US Central bank said if I remember correctly even thought I'm paraphrasing "if more people knew how the world economy works there would be a revolution within a day" keep it up if you can bro and I just hope you can coast off this for the rest of your life. Much luv

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +6

      Thanks mate, that's amazing to here, your comment made my night :)

  • @topsander
    @topsander Před 3 lety +2

    Hmm... felt like I missed something in here... staying at home alse saves lives, doesn't it? I mean... less traffic means less air polution means less people dying from lung diseases. Also there should be less traffic incidents which kill people. I've also read that criminals are more likely to stay at home, which means reduced crime rates (which probably also adds to fewer people dying).. I felt that this was kind of important to talk about as well when discussing this, especially looking at the current situation...

    • @michaelhunsinger8351
      @michaelhunsinger8351 Před 3 lety

      All that life saving stuff means fuckall when you can't afford to eat. Famine has a way higher death rate than the commie cough.

  • @PCDestroyer31
    @PCDestroyer31 Před 3 lety +1

    I love your videos! Keep up the good work.

  • @kalleguld
    @kalleguld Před 3 lety +28

    Shouldn't it be "per year" or something? Or is it just a one-time thing?

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +19

      its over a non specific time period, it's definitely worth reading the book because it details how it all breaks down pretty well.

    • @eoghan.5003
      @eoghan.5003 Před 3 lety +2

      No, that doesn't matter. If 1% become unemployed, a certain number die. It doesn't matter when they die as long as it was a result of the unemployment. The 1% increase is a single event.

    • @CarFreeSegnitz
      @CarFreeSegnitz Před 3 lety +3

      It's a completely stupid concept. People are dying all the time for every reason under the sun. To say with certainty that a death was due to unemployment is magical thinking.
      A motorist is travelling down a freeway with windows open. A wasp flies in and in a panic stings the driver. The driver is severely distracted and winds up striking and killing a motorcyclist. Did the motorcyclist die due to motorcycling? Traffic accident? Wasp sting? Or by unemployment because he lost his job a few hours earlier? Maybe he wouldn't have been there at all had he instead been at his job.

    • @benjaminchen8857
      @benjaminchen8857 Před 3 lety +2

      Lenard Segnitz Assuming there are the same number of motorists who die the same way every year, that is accounted for by subtracting the previous years' death toll. There are more sophisticated ways of doing it, but that's not a bad one

    • @petegromov9037
      @petegromov9037 Před 3 lety

      @@eoghan.5003 And even if those newly unemployed would not die quickly, one can assume year or two is shaved off their life expectancy.

  • @phizzhead53
    @phizzhead53 Před 3 lety +33

    When the person who was in jail for dealing crack gets the job instead of you because he has more sales experience

  • @icebox1954
    @icebox1954 Před 3 lety +1

    Have you done an economic look at Denmark yet? I've seen your video titled 'Is Norway the perfect economy' or something, and i really liked it.
    Maybe you could tackle the bank money laundering or how its covid-19 response will affect its economy in the long term compared to Sweden.
    I'd also especially like to know Denmark's economic shortcomings. As a dane myself it feels weird that my country gets so much praise, when one of our favorite passtimes is complaining about our country.
    I'm a big fan of your channel. You have cleared away some of the mist on macro economics, and I've begun thinking about the economy in ways that I wouldn't have before.
    -A proud patron

  • @tobir693
    @tobir693 Před 3 lety +2

    Assuming that since the unemployment isn't "as structural" in the case of COVID, and therefore should lead to as many deaths is faulty. Because on top of not having a job, most people (if they follow the rules in the many places) can't go to church, social groups, or even see their family. But they can still go to casinos, and liquor stores, which makes everything way way worse.

  • @SemGabelko
    @SemGabelko Před 3 lety +15

    Which one is correct? "'Both of them"". A typical economist answer 😂😂

    • @Kenionatus
      @Kenionatus Před 3 lety

      A typical scholar's answer :)

  • @joaofelipecastro8232
    @joaofelipecastro8232 Před 3 lety +4

    This study does not take into consideration the amount of people that will have their health situation worsened due to the loss of their job. I believe that it is unquestionable that unemployed people will eat less or will not eat at all and, because of this, will become more vulnerable to other diseases and end up dying because of this. It not just about stress issues. The death toll because of job loss is much higher than this figure. It's just that there is no study on it.

    • @daniel_960_
      @daniel_960_ Před 3 lety

      I guess for most Americans having to stop eating is a good thing.

  • @victorespino5650
    @victorespino5650 Před 2 lety

    I tried looking this up couldn't find it... you earned yourself a sub!!

  • @shadmansudipto7287
    @shadmansudipto7287 Před 3 lety

    I was always interested in this, thanks for the video.

  • @tsundereninja519
    @tsundereninja519 Před 3 lety +15

    @Economics Explained
    Will there be an episode about the economy of Vietnam ?

  • @williamcastillo3743
    @williamcastillo3743 Před 3 lety +6

    This time , in my 21 years of age is the most depressing period I’ve ever been in . I’ve been unemployed since February of 2020, and have been unable to find any employment ever since . This is extremely depressing .

  • @josephdestaubin7426
    @josephdestaubin7426 Před 3 lety +2

    Um, I am in construction and have been since 1998. I can tell you with absolutely zero doubt that a lot of people in the industry definitely saw it coming. Shea, for instance, reseeded an entire development project in late 2006 after they cleared the land for 600 houses. The speck homes I was working on for another builder saw a winding down of inventory in mid-2006 to early 2007. Why, because everyone knew that people were buying way too much house for their own good.

  • @severinbechtold1873
    @severinbechtold1873 Před 3 lety

    Thanks mate!
    Good content as always,
    just seemed to me that the "densitiy" wasn't so high as in previous videos. I felt you could have packed the video in half the time

  • @priyansubhagabati8157
    @priyansubhagabati8157 Před 3 lety +22

    😁seems like economics explained working hard to not be fired by us

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +10

      Yes please, I WANNA LIVE!

    • @ulurag
      @ulurag Před 3 lety

      @@EconomicsExplained How about basic income, for a society to be civil - it should help everyone meet their most basic needs as humans, a home and food at minimum.

    • @chrono-glitchwaterlily8776
      @chrono-glitchwaterlily8776 Před 3 lety +1

      @@ulurag inflation would drag prices up since some people wouldn't know how to save money and waste everything. Some also wouldn't have the incentive to work thus damaging the economy : )
      Try Kurzgesagt for a video on Universal Basic Income or UBI

    • @ulurag
      @ulurag Před 3 lety

      @@chrono-glitchwaterlily8776 Last time I checked Kurtzegast argued for UBI. Most people will still want to afford more than the absolute minimum, like food and rent that the UBI would cover, therefore the insentive to work would still be strong.

  • @leonardobrito4829
    @leonardobrito4829 Před 3 lety +33

    EE: "Almost no one saw the fallout of the housing market collapse comming"
    Austriacs: "Am I a joke to you?"

    • @Eric-zl1kn
      @Eric-zl1kn Před 3 lety +6

      To be fair both the Marxian and Austrian schools always point to the business cycle as if everyone else is oblivious to it; as if it were a rhetorical device. Of course, economists (not every) expected an economic downturn after a peak that's a given I would be careful not to give too much credit to one school over another just because we're unfamiliar with the contributions of another. Either way, the metric of when an economic downturn will happen is largely speculative and most experts that do pride themselves on these predictions often give themselves a large enough wedge of deniability that it doesn't even matter.

    • @12vscience
      @12vscience Před 3 lety +4

      The crisis was practically guaranteed to happen when the government forced private institutions to provide loans to unqualified applicants. It was called a NINJA (No Income No Job Application) loan.

    • @knh5954
      @knh5954 Před 3 lety

      @@12vscience en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_policies_and_the_subprime_mortgage_crisis

  • @samueljrichardson2499
    @samueljrichardson2499 Před 3 lety +2

    great video as always, thank you

  • @aaronbono4688
    @aaronbono4688 Před 3 lety +2

    You say that it's unfair to compare the US to underdeveloped countries but I think it's an interesting question because it tells us in the US how bad we could make it if we start to destroy our social programs which a number of people in government are trying to do. Just how bad could we make it from where we are now if we start cutting social security, food stamps, unemployment checks, Medicaid and other programs like that?

  • @hblaub
    @hblaub Před 3 lety +34

    Middle income guy: The poor people are dying!
    Rich guy: Don't care. I have to catch my plane to Swiss to hide my cash.
    Poor guy #1: I am not poor!
    Poor guy #2: I just have to work more...
    Poor guy #3: I soon will become a millionaire!

    • @abinodattil6422
      @abinodattil6422 Před 3 lety +1

      hblaub work smart and hard, u will be a millionaire

    • @user-lr4bo
      @user-lr4bo Před 3 lety +3

      Ok leftist

    • @hblaub
      @hblaub Před 3 lety +8

      @@user-lr4bo Ok right-wing.

    • @darthhodges
      @darthhodges Před 3 lety +2

      You operate under a false premise. None of the middle income families I know believe they are middle income, they all think they are poor (myself included since I qualify for food stamps and my kids for medicaid despite being middle income). And almost none of the rich families I know (relatives and people I go to church with) believe they are actually rich, they think they are middle class. The federal poverty line is above the threshold for being middle class in this country and what most people consider acceptable is above average (and every federal politician is in the 1% from their salary alone). And we are one of the richest countries in the world. 25% of Occupy Wall Street protesters were themselves in the 1%. Our perceptions are skewed and the government has made it worse.
      I suggest the following is more realistic:
      Middle income guy: We poor people are dying!
      Rich guy: This poor person is dying! (But you can't have my money to fix it)
      Child of rich guy: Socialism will correct the evils I have suffered under capitalism!
      Actual poor guy #1: Passed out on drugs
      Actual poor guy #2: I just have to work harder
      Actual poor guy #3: Poor? Getting a job would be a pay cut compared to what I get from the government.

    • @margaretmukasa5152
      @margaretmukasa5152 Před 3 lety +1

      Don't blame a drug dealers for making a quick income times are tuff. A drug dealer never runs out of customers. This country has joined the shithole list.

  • @benjamino.7475
    @benjamino.7475 Před 3 lety +25

    EE: “All countries with no form of social security are either underdeveloped or developing.” United States: “Allow us to introduce ourselves.”

    • @altrag
      @altrag Před 3 lety +7

      The US has a form of social security.
      Its (rather intentionally) terrible and ineffective, but they have one.

    • @altrag
      @altrag Před 3 lety +2

      @fane babanu Pretty much every country has great social security for their elite. Its a toss-up in some cases whether government officials are considered "elite" but there's almost always a class of rich untouchables that are given privilege during (and usually even profit off) even the most horrid civil wars, famines and other disasters.

    • @altrag
      @altrag Před 3 lety +1

      @WHATS YOURSOC Its funny how the misogyny that triggers you to whine about "OLD Wemen" sucking off the system is the same misogyny that forced them to do nothing with their lives beyond raise babies for the "man of the house." Most of them would have loved it if the society of the 1920s and 1930s (and even up to the 60s, 70s and beyond) would have allowed them the choice of going out and finding meaningful employment. You know how you've been going crazy being semi-stuck inside for a few months because of covid? For a lot of women in "the old days," that was their entire lives.
      But leaving history aside, you never suggested a solution. Are you going to go snuff out _your_ grandmother? Are you going to voluntarily take your own life when you're no longer useful to society? Because unless you're suggesting mass murder of the elderly, there isn't a whole lot of options. There's a lot of things in this world that suck and the only thing that sucks more is all of the alternatives. We can't magically make old people be not old, nor can we go back to 1920 and tell them that women need to get into the workforce ASAP because 100 years later we're going to decide that dollars are worth more than lives.
      Your only options are support the elderly or kill them off. Take your pick, but be ready and willing to start with your own family if you choose the latter.

    • @meganlukes6679
      @meganlukes6679 Před 3 lety +1

      If the US didn’t have any form of social security there wouldn’t be any jokes/complaints about welfare fraud or the fundamentally insolvent social security system for the elderly. Entire books have been written on how the US welfare state incentivizes people not to work and leads to generational poverty. You can’t compare the US to any other country because no other country is as massive and culturally heterogeneous. Culture is what allows the children of poor East Asians to succeed while the children of poor whites fail.

    • @MatthewStinar
      @MatthewStinar Před 3 lety

      The US is a deliberately underdeveloped nation trampled by an oligarchy.

  • @Typhy7
    @Typhy7 Před 3 lety +2

    The Big Short was an excellent movie. It was what got me interested in economics.

  • @AvoidTheCadaver
    @AvoidTheCadaver Před 2 lety +1

    I've had the fun privilege of experiencing both cyclical unemployment, because of the tech crash back in 2001, and structural unemployment, when the company closed down the entire subsidiary I worked in. Both cases I was made redundant along with everyone else. Luckily no major impacts in the long run. I got a masters afte the tech crash and I was only out of work for a week the second time.
    However, some of my colleague sin the second company really struggled to get new jobs

  • @tomlxyz
    @tomlxyz Před 3 lety +36

    "Almost no one even saw it coming"
    Seriously? The people most involved in it were very aware of it and just went along

    • @theparagonal
      @theparagonal Před 3 lety +6

      Congresspeople had a meeting about what stocks to sell instead of how to keep us alive :^)

    • @CarFreeSegnitz
      @CarFreeSegnitz Před 3 lety +6

      The movie, The Big Short, highlighted a bunch of real-life people who knew full well that the real estate market pre-2008 was BS. John Paulson had connections inside Goldman-Sachs with whom he invented a bunch of financial instruments that skyrocketed with the real estate collapse. In 2007 Paulson drew nearly $4 BILLION in personal compensation.
      The financial industry the world over is terrible. It draws in very clever people to invent schemes which do nothing other than to transfer money from the bigger fools. Finance has been tasked with robbing governments of needed tax revenue which by extension is to rob labour of its surplus value.
      John Paulson's contribution to humanity was to spot a fallacy in the market, a real estate bubble, and hasten its collapse. But instead of using his talents to lessen the impact he chose to take obscene personal compensation. Millions lost their jobs and homes. The blow-back from 2008 was probably the root cause of the rise of Trump.

    • @Inquiring
      @Inquiring Před 3 lety +1

      Lenard Segnitz Capitalism is great. Financial world is amazing. Fiat money is responsible for the amazing and beautiful world we live in today.

    • @XDbored1
      @XDbored1 Před 3 lety +1

      ​@@CarFreeSegnitz but a economic bubble is Pandoras box its only a matter of time before enough people with enough money find out and take advantage of it
      what could John Paulson do to lessen the crash? even if you had absurd levels of money to throw away if you tried to slowly smooth out the bubble the entire rest of the stock market will still pull out as soon as stocks start going down instead of up and if someone else with lots of money tried to profit from bursting the bubble all that effort would be for nothing anyway
      the only 2 ways to fix a bubble is to pop it
      or somehow blow up the rest of the economy extremely quickly but not the bubble in such away that relative values would be corrected causing mass inflation which is extremely difficult and risky to the point only a nation state could consider trying to pull it off and most wouldn't be stupid enough to go ahead with it
      the financial industry is terrible but there's nothing individuals like John Paulson could do about it if we abolished the FED and reduced barriers to market a free economy without a inevitable debt cycle and with more competition and less crony capitalism in the corporate sector would not allow such a huge bubble to form in the first place
      the problem is systematic so it calls for a systematic solution

    • @TheBaldr
      @TheBaldr Před 3 lety +3

      @@Inquiring Because of Capitalism less than 25% of the world live in extreme poverty, before capitalism 99%+ lived in extreme poverty. Before Capitalism a famine could kill millions, now only famine happens in places with corrupt governments.

  • @sabriath
    @sabriath Před 3 lety +3

    Well the movie was in the context of people losing their homes and jobs through a "depression"....so the figures were actually undercutting the full impact of the crisis at hand. Had the government not "helped" in some way, we would have seen far more deaths due to unemployment because those jobs wouldn't have come back, they would have gone bankrupt.....but they were bailed out. Context is important.

  • @matttaylor9471
    @matttaylor9471 Před 3 lety +1

    Great vid as always!

  • @nonyabeeznuss304
    @nonyabeeznuss304 Před 3 lety +1

    I can tell you right now, I make JUST enough to cover living expenses. If anything goes wrong at all, car break down, somebody gets sick or injured, unexpected expense.... Thats it. Theres nothing to cover it. If the car breaks it stays broke. If one of us gets sick, we're eating food bank donations for the next month. The rise in cost of living over the last year has completely eaten up our ability to save or plan ahead. Unless we are dumping all efforts into just maintaining our position, it all goes away.

  • @petrvorlicek466
    @petrvorlicek466 Před 3 lety +4

    7:21 : starts playing
    Me, a random Czech dude : Hey, czech it out!

  • @lasoul3562
    @lasoul3562 Před 3 lety +15

    being broke should be illegal 😭

    • @Okuni_
      @Okuni_ Před 3 lety +5

      if people doesnt go broke who would be willing to work part time jobs with no health insurance at Amazon Storehouses

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 Před 3 lety +2

      So when you become broke you get arrested? doesn't sound good to me.

    • @dhgfhhhghhj
      @dhgfhhhghhj Před 3 lety +4

      @@geradosolusyon511 yea but the cops will shoot you while aresting you. Bc you only cost money if your in jail

    • @joshuadyer6983
      @joshuadyer6983 Před 3 lety +1

      Move to the U.S. my guy - being broke already is illegal. Look up "criminalization of poverty".

    • @geradosolusyon511
      @geradosolusyon511 Před 3 lety +1

      @@joshuadyer6983 well, if you live there, I advice to move as soon as possible.

  • @nickhoover685
    @nickhoover685 Před 3 lety

    This channel is absolutely fantastic.

  • @Sunny198325
    @Sunny198325 Před 3 lety +1

    Another classic line from the movie when Steve Carell challanges Fitch on AAA for sub prime mortgages . What are you 4(years), still remember the line

  • @ethribin4188
    @ethribin4188 Před 3 lety +3

    Why is switzerland always left out when making comparisons?
    Its right up there together with sweden, norway and denmark.
    Just curious why its always Norway or Sweden thats mentioned, but never Switzerland.

  • @richdobbs6595
    @richdobbs6595 Před 3 lety +3

    It sort of depends on how Civil War/Revolution/Police State scenario plays out. In this particular episode, the people that die from American and other Western economy unemployment will be in developing countries through impacts on child mortality, etc. But those folks might be the walking dead anyway, depending on how the collapse of global trade plays out.

  • @djayjp
    @djayjp Před 3 lety +1

    2:08 No, it's not a rounding error, it's just stated to a lower degree of accuracy (the degree to which we round and what is correct is totally arbitrary, but depends on the number of significant figures, in terms of achievable/real accuracy, in the data). Some numbers can be merely mathematical artifacts, not tied to meaningful empirical data.

  • @LeviMarshall
    @LeviMarshall Před 3 lety

    Just finished watching all of your videos! Could you do an economic analysis on CANZUK in a future video?

  • @alphacause
    @alphacause Před 3 lety +3

    The video makes a distinction between structural unemployment and cyclical unemployment. The former leads to permanent job loss, while the latter manifests itself as a transient loss of jobs, and these jobs, given enough time, will return. While most of the jobs that are lost as a result of the COVID-19 lock down can be considered cyclical, is it possible that, given the gravity of this cyclical loss, that companies will be compelled to accelerate their investment into automation? Hence, what started out as cyclical unemployment could hasten the structural unemployment that automation was supposed to bring about, but now it will do so sooner. In other words, COVID-19 may expedite the very permanent unemployment dystopia that we thought was a few decades down the road.

  • @Charlesaltendorf
    @Charlesaltendorf Před 3 lety +3

    Really love your work and how you break things down. I wish more of my friends here in Kentucky took the time to understand how economics work. I guess I'll just keep posting your videos.

  • @unknowninfinium4353
    @unknowninfinium4353 Před 3 lety +2

    Funny thing I am reading wealth of nations and when I started the labour part in book 1. It still stands out today even if it was written in 1778.

  • @chasefitch2245
    @chasefitch2245 Před 3 lety

    Can you do a video on the long term affects of Covid? Like what industries/businesses will go up or down? What industries will arise and what industries will go away? What are the other effects? How will this affect labor, employment, economic policy (UBI, etc) and daily life?

  • @schroederscurrentevents3844

    Next time people tell you that caring about the economy is caring about money instead of lives, prove them wrong. The economy is lives.

  • @irenee800
    @irenee800 Před 3 lety +4

    is there a link to the study?

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +2

      it's a book, you can find it on amazon pretty easily, but unfortunately it's not available as a download online anywhere I was able to find.

  • @debbest8546
    @debbest8546 Před 3 lety +1

    Love the videos. I make my girlfriend watch them as your explanations are clear, concise, and simple.

  • @jason2mate
    @jason2mate Před 3 lety +1

    I'd be curious on your thoughts as to if these figures would be closer to accurate (obviously not counting Covid deaths) if we assume that there is a long term chance that we don't get back into the swing of things.
    Being a victorian myself, i'm not super confident, and while i understand that the number would likely have to be scaled down (due to less population being talked about i believe) i feel like Victoria might be in this place for longer then we would like.

  • @rahultherash
    @rahultherash Před 3 lety +4

    Make a video on "Future job market economic changes due to AI , Data Science and Automation"

    • @wajnerw
      @wajnerw Před 3 lety +1

      There will be a bunch of videos on that topic and here's the tip - nobody knows. They will all get it wrong. Happens all the time through history.

    • @rahultherash
      @rahultherash Před 3 lety

      @@wajnerw i know that nobody knows exact future , all I wanted to know is the view point of an experienced economist and his way of thinking. 🙂

    • @wajnerw
      @wajnerw Před 3 lety +1

      @@rahultherash You want bullshit? Read Thomas Malthus predictions. Karl Marx also. They were highly educated and experienced, and they got it all wrong.

    • @rahultherash
      @rahultherash Před 3 lety

      @@wajnerw I wanted to learn how good economists think and what factors they consider while analysing. I wanted to learn the process and then use that myself to come to my own conclusions. 🙂

    • @wajnerw
      @wajnerw Před 3 lety +1

      @@rahultherash F.A. Hayek, Ludwig von Mises... Knock yourself out!

  • @masterofpureawesome
    @masterofpureawesome Před 3 lety +10

    Now I know the vids are posted at 5:30am PST

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +5

      Actually just posted this one a little early. They are normally half an hour later than this.

    • @benmcfarlane2959
      @benmcfarlane2959 Před 3 lety +1

      So you post at 11pm AEST?

    • @sambros2
      @sambros2 Před 3 lety

      Why can’t you upload at a good time for Australians

  • @miroslavkutak9430
    @miroslavkutak9430 Před 3 lety

    I love how many of the accompanying shots are from Prague!

  • @haaasful
    @haaasful Před 3 lety +2

    This is worse than the GFC in 2008 folks. I'm glad I'm not graduate and entering the workforce in this times. I have scars from the GFC which have not healed. Get ready for scarring young folks.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +1

      Imagine graduating in 2008, and getting your 10 years industry experience going into this mess.

  • @kingofrivia1248
    @kingofrivia1248 Před 3 lety +41

    Well than there are less people unemployed😂

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +42

      Modern problems require modern solutions.

    • @adityadupare1532
      @adityadupare1532 Před 3 lety +17

      The Kim Jong-un method

    • @wipmegrandma8780
      @wipmegrandma8780 Před 3 lety +11

      @@EconomicsExplained That's gotta be the most dystopian use of that phrase I've ever heard hahaha

    • @CarFreeSegnitz
      @CarFreeSegnitz Před 3 lety +1

      Economics Explained modern problems require the guillotining of the upper 0.01%.

    • @jerryhall5709
      @jerryhall5709 Před 3 lety

      Society doesn't want 0% unemployment. If nobody is unemployed then the workers can start demanding higher wages and cherry-pick the jobs. Instead of 1000 applicants for a job there will be only one who set the terms. Companies don't want that.

  • @robhingston
    @robhingston Před 3 lety +3

    I lost my job and I’m much poorer but more healthy physically and mentally and emotionally

    • @s0so328
      @s0so328 Před 3 lety

      How so?

    • @hassanbeydoun2460
      @hassanbeydoun2460 Před 3 lety

      @@s0so328 My best guess is his job was too stressful, so when he lost his job it became stress _relief_

  • @ChocolateMilkCultLeader

    Great vid as always

  • @effegretzel9165
    @effegretzel9165 Před 3 lety +2

    11:20 Plenty of people saw it coming. The only people who didn't see it coming had no business being in the market or were blinded by the bubble. It was an 'emperor has no clothes' situation. Market experts saw this coming including Greenspan himself years before.

  • @AlessioPunzi
    @AlessioPunzi Před 3 lety +9

    So many comments in too short a time to have watched the whole video...

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +3

      ahh some people just like to be heard you know? let them have their fun :)

    • @denniss3980
      @denniss3980 Před 3 lety

      Back when MSN allowed for comments on news stories people would post 100+ word essays just minutes after a story was posted suggesting a select group of people were given the article in advance of its public release,

  • @singhrajat
    @singhrajat Před 3 lety +4

    Any other movie recommendation for finance nerds!?

    • @sethwilliams8625
      @sethwilliams8625 Před 3 lety +2

      it’s not really technical, but Margin Call was pretty good.

    • @singhrajat
      @singhrajat Před 3 lety

      @@sethwilliams8625 ohkk I'll have look👍tq

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  Před 3 lety +2

      margin call and the OG wall street are pretty good IMO, not quiet as detail oriented as this but definitely fun for finance nerds.

    • @Drknnja
      @Drknnja Před 3 lety +1

      Boiler Room

  • @KalamariFromTheParty
    @KalamariFromTheParty Před 3 lety

    Can you do a video about the economics behind the resell industry (like yeezys, and other hypebeast items). This could also include general retail arbitrage buying and selling