Russia vs NATO military power comparison 2022 | Data First
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 04. 2022
- Hi there, from this video we are going to have a look at the Russia vs NATO military power comparison in the ground, air, and naval forces. NATO is a military organization created by the collection of 30 countries in Europe and North America. Russia is a country located in Asia and Europe and a giant in military power.
Please Note: All the images in this video belong to their respectful owners.
Watch More
NATO Vs China Military Power Comparison 2022
• NATO Vs China Military...
Russia and China vs USA and NATO
• Russia and China vs US...
US and India vs china and Pakistan Military Power Comparison
• US and India vs china ...
Music Credits
The Great Battle by Alexander Nakarada | www.serpentsoundstudios.com
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
creativecommons.org/licenses/
Music promoted by www.chosic.com/free-music/all/
Hostiles Inbound by Miguel Johnson | / migueljohnsonm
Music promoted by www.chosic.com/free-music/all/
Creative Commons CC BY 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/
Thank you for watching, Subscribe and star with Data First.
The US military alone dwarfs Russia's military and you're talking all of NATO with 30 members. Putin invaded Ukraine to stop NATO expansion and Ukraine wasn't even going to join NATO and neither were Sweden and Finland until he invaded Ukraine. LOL. Hey Vlad, say hello to your newest NATO members/neighbors, Sweden and Finland.
Because usa was poking the bear, america is smart and got what it wanted,gas contract, west sanctions, new world order will fail, dollar and euro will fall!
Im from sweden and Sweden and Finland is litte country, rusia will easly beat them down with nuclear, which we cant defend for it!
Very true. Ukraine would have not joined NATO since at least Hungary would have opposed it. But that was not why Poo-tin attacked Ukraine anyway- that is just the lie he sold to the Russians. So he said NATO and they pooped their pants as usual.
Seems Putin's popularity has greatly declined due to he & his oli's theft . The people barely live . Yet every time he starts a war his popularity rises . Thereby ensuring his survival , both politically and otherwise .
Exactly, even without the US they would be fighting the combined armed forces of the other 29 nations
And at the top of that pile are several of the world's strongest armed forces and three all been practising how to fight as one for _decades_
The technological and training overmatch enjoyed by those top nations (let's choose UK, France, Germany, Italy and Poland) is enormous
Remember Desert Storm?
Their tanks and aircraft would be exploding and they wouldn't even have known we were there.
There are only 3 navies in the world that have true global power projection blue water navies and they're all in NATO (UK, France and the US)
We have the only supercarriers outside the US, the only nuclear carrier outside the US and the Italian Carvour although smaller carriers 10 F-35Bs
We have the most advanced tanks outside of the USA, the aircraft, the armaments, second only to the USA
Our advanced weapons systems, missiles and bombs, I would argue _are_ the very best in the world.
And all backed up by enormous populations and buckets of cash to throw at a war when we have to
War with Russia would look like trees being fed into a wood chipper
No comparison russia is Just the 2nd best Army in ukraine.
Hahaha, I see what you did there. It was very true and funny. Good one.
😂😂
Could of swore I thought 2007
Top comment 👌
Third best. You forgot the Ukrainian Farmers Auxiliary.
An amazing comparison of Russia's military strength against 31 countries 😂😂😂👍🏻
you think they alone? you got to be joking buddy
@@moelester391 Are they NATO? Or the Russians?
@@moelester391 I mean, it's more usual to see a comparison (for example) USA and Russia, or China. Comparison of two countries. And then the coalition)
@@monkeys7187 wet dreams
@@moelester391 What? Who made this video was who compared 1 contry vs 29 countries. Who is joking here?
You forgot about the fact that the NATO is not a country, but an alliance
true
You forgot about that fact, that russians "power" gets screwed right now by only one county😂
@@samcresh4730 Man, did you know that not the whole Russian army is involved in the conflict. The Russian power there is pretty equal to the other country's forces.
If he compares Alyan with Russia, then compare Alyan with the alliance.. Compare NATO with Russia+China+India+Iran 🫵☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
May i ask why Russia is risking herself to fight with NATO countries? Outcome is obvious.
I mean planes and soldiers are all quite neat, but if there really is gonna be a war between NATO and Russia which I highly doubt, everybody would die of nuclear bombs.
공감합니다. 핵 왜 안나올까요?
NATO it is a Alliance. You thinking 1 st**id country can win big Alliance? Haha.
Not necessarily.
@@erikcapozzi3425 yes necessarily
As it is for now - the count down has begun already.
Russian numbers, such as the amounts of main battle tanks, are hugely overestimated. They look great on paper, but in reality, it turns out that three quarters of those 12 thousand tanks are inoperable junk from storages. Not to mention the lack of skilled crews.
nato is no diffetent
Most of Russian weapons are rubbish and we can see that in Ukraine!Also their soldiers are amateurs and have no clue how to fight.The only advantage of Russia is nuclear weapons.In WW2 they were supported by USA that is why they looked so strong.Otherwise they are highly overestimated!
You have no clue what you're talking about.
"Inoperable junk" is a vast overstatement. Russia has been selling off and shipping out obsolete but perfectly functional T-55s, T-62s, and T-72s to Syria, Iraq, and many countries in Africa within the last 10 years. Their stocks of T-90, T-80, and T-72 are by most defense analysts perfectly operable, some with a requirement for refurbishment or upgrade packages, particularly the ones from the 80s and 90s, but that is already standard when taking tanks out of storage depots, even the tanks they end up selling usually get some degree of upgrading, barely minimum being some ERA and FCS upgrades.
For comparison the US has something like 4000 Abrams in storage, mostly M1A1 and some M1A2. M1A1 is from the mid-80s, so about as old if not older than a lot of the Russian tanks in storage. For any of these to enter American service, or even be sold off to allies, they would likely be upgraded to SEPv3 standard at least, for US service, if not the upcoming SEPv4, and for overseas export a standard similar to M1A2S sold to the Saudis, or M1A2-K sold to Kuwait.
Crews are another issue entirely. Russian conscription leaves much to be desired but it is not exactly difficult to train crews to some modest level of performance. Tanks are not nearly as complicated nor difficult to use as planes, and even in NATO service tanker positions like driver and loader are trained within weeks, gunners take longer and tank commanders typically as long as a year.
Russian equipment isn't necessarily garbage. Most of their tanks may be old, but function perfectly fine. Their crews and tactics are garbage. The equipment being sent to Ukraine by the allies is doing exactly what it was designed to do. You think a javelin wouldn't smoke an M1A2 or a Leopard?
Russia's technical capability is excellent, but its army isn't well prepared for drone attacks, that's for sure.
The worst thing is that Russia is one country, while NATO is an alliance of 30 countries
And? I mean its a country against a coalition. Thats the point of NATO.
And nothing, I mean that in the event of any conflict, God forbid, Russia is one country, and a NATO alliance is an alliance, and looking at history (1939 invasion of Poland and help from England and France) one should not rely on such alliances@@igyboo
But where is the problem? The NATO was founded in 1949 because of Communism on Russian side. Russia controlled East-Germany after WW2 and Stalin could wanted to install the Sovietcommunism there, to prevent another charge of European countries on the Soviet-Union. And this is also the beginning of Cold-War. And don't forget that many NATO partners are very small like Baltic-States, Denmark, Netherland, Belgium, Greece, Montenegro and it also depends on the amount of money the government spends on its military.
@@ketrab5154 the thing is that there was no real treaty before Nato, WEU or Treaty of Brussels. The attack on poland officially started WW2 as invasion of poland was an ultimatum (no invasion or full on war) given to Nazi Germany. Now there are alliances that are used to protect europe from aggression. And I do believe that if an attack happens Nato coalition will form defensive/offensive countermeasures. (Source: My uncle (General In NATO (Now retired), and other useful sources)
And Russia is a federation of dozens of smaller, we could say occupied, states on 2 continents. It will fall apart if they lose in ukraine. Dissasembly of USSR was not enough, even nations living under today Russia should be free and have their own countries.
Только не будем забывать , что нато это союз стран , а Россия одна ❤
Пока что 😉
Скоро будет не одна, а ноль.
@@nickmakeitbetter ты это про НАТО говоришь, Россия вот будет больше иметь союзников и Японию и вообще в том видео не состыковка, там уже больше техники сделанно.
33:2 почти всухую НАТО выносит Россию. А Путинские пропагандоны говорят, что мир Россией будет
и в резерве более 250 тысяч
This comparison doesn’t take into amount training quality, logistics, morale, etc. if one is to compare war fighting ability.
Also, are these figures accurate and current? I’ve heard Russia has lost a few tanks and other assets lately. 😝
Slaughterhouse5 , correct. We need an update of later 😁😁😁😁
@Bandhu you do realize that some NATO Troops will literally put hot sauce in their eyes so they won't fall asleep right?
Where do you heard it?..😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 take it easy dude..😁
@Bandhu 😂😂🙌
@Bandhu sure!! . NATO is just going to sit there while Russia are bogged down lmao cos that makes sense. And at least 2 other idiots liked your comment. I suspect you probably you're number 3 and liked your own comment.
Finland would make a good addition to Nato with 1 million reservists and one of the best artillery systems in the world
Don't forget china,north Korea Iran and probably India would make a good addition to Russia's superpower as well 😂
@@muhdfazli7409 I mean India is the world's largest democracy aligned with dictators and authoritarianism isn't a good look for them.
@@muhdfazli7409
China and India will never lie in bed with this living dead Putin. "Superpower" only in insanity. Have you forgotten who has lost the cold war? The times of russian "superpower" are 30 years ago.
@@muhdfazli7409 lol, like India would ally with with Russia in a war with NATO! KEEP DREAMING. AND N KOREA doesn't even have an aircraft that can fly more than a hundred miles. Had to borrow the Chinese aircraft just to fly Kim to Singapore! So good luck with that!
@@muhdfazli7409 India would not align themselves with China in a world war.
That music is powerful, gave me goosebumps!
As someone from a NATO country, Im saying that you should upload a new video where you compare NATO with Russia and their allies like Belarus, Iran etc.
Para isso twrian que comparar os demais paises do lado da otan como Brasil Índia Argentina etc...
Isso realmente seria a terceira G mundial
Etc. meaning North Korea. 2 other Authoritarian Hellholes.
China would not ally with russia and the others are of no merit
yeah, and NATO with Finland and Sweden XD
Most of these numbers are many times larger than the Russians, which is exactly why the Russians fear NATO. We have been brainwashed for years thinking the Russians were ten feet tall; however, they cannot beat little Ukraine on their own, so I'd say they are only a foot tall. One item not shown on the video, which is the most powerful weapon of all is the shear professionalism of the western forces. Highly trained, with the high tech gear they should be able to handle Russia without breaking much of a swet. Given that the Ukraine soldiers are using mostly western weapons tells the story. With small western weapons system the Russians are being held, or defeated. If the Ukrainians had the full power of NATO systems, then this war would be done by now.
The longer the Ukraine war plays out, the more likely Russia will lose. Its already lost by most of their own metrics.
Sans nuclear
Lol Ukraine has a support of nato n their latest technology weapon but where in Russia is being caution to limit civilian casualties but cmg by ur logic then super power usa and nato was in Afgan for 20year still have to return defeated so can we conclude that Afghanistan has defeated NATO.
FAAAAAAAAAAACTS!!!!!!!!!
I agreed Russia is poor country
Russia has a lot less tanks now. The Ukrainians defense is legit.
russia lies when listing numbers also . they only had 2800 active tanks before the war ten thousand are in storage and most of them are scrap metal need to be replaced . they count 1930s tanks as reserves from world war 2 . same goes with many of their listed numbers they list 1950s jets to boast their numbers on paper .
@@apollo-eu4fk 💯
Thanks in part from the US and UK in getting those Javelins. Those weapons are lit.
@@bhattiji433 you mean the fact the Russian Army couldnt capture a single city until now. Ukraine will get it back with ease.
Less Tanks yes, the Oldies from the '60 and '70 😂.
Че за бред? Сравнивать одну страну (какая бы она не была) с целым блоком стран. Давайте сравним тогда уж НАТО с СССР. Ну а че?
И БРИКС еще припишем, хотя это уже торгово-дипломатическая организация 👀
5:31 This photo shows a helicopter with Polish markings - Polish red and white aviation checkerboard. This mistake should be explained in the description of the video.
Dokładnie
It’s no wonder Putin is playing the nuclear threat this early in the game. It’s his only card.
No it isnt, he have more. Putin have sent only 10% of His Army against all Ukraine and this is a big Deal. Russia have made and make more damage with this 10% Army against Ukraine then Ukraine to Russians Invasion with 10% thickness of Army
Exactly!
I'd be surprise if they work as they should.
@Marhild Ordo who said it the fullshited west
@@jonathonblacker299 😂😂
After seeing two semi modern militaries going at it. Now we need to ask the question as to how many of the indicated numbers of vehicles and equipment are serviced and maintained for actual operational use versus how many are just in cold storage and if they are taken out of storage what is the country's financial capacity to bring them all to fighting performance. Its no longer about which side has the most vehicles/equipment but which has the most ready to go vehicles/equipment as well as an economy to finance that war effort.
this is a direct hit to russia i see but out of russia 150billion yearly budget almost half of it goes to maintain the old tech which is why russia is using it in the war with ukraine to get rid of it and also shows us why they dont really care if they lose it or gets destroyed
@@NahIdWin995 half of it goes into general's and politician's pockets. The other half is spent on vodka.
@@CH-pv2rz mhm sure
@@NahIdWin995 So you're basically saying they're using this war to get rid of their old equipment lose men and resources just to get new equipment in the end?
Wouldn't you think that recycling these tanks and using it for their "modern" vehicles would be a better choice?
and the other half of the budget is for vodka and bribes.@@NahIdWin995
Make video nato vs russia+china+iran+korea pls
Great: Include Thailand, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, Tawain, South Korea etc. please.
NATO countries have 78% of the world budget, and they can increase their military power 9 times within 3 months. Imagine a NATO 9 times stronger, all the more so that within a year it can increase its military power 32 times. You don't know the power of NATO, what it can do. Imagine if other alliances like Japan, South Korea, Australia, etc. were taken.
@@biglebowski5737 Why?) They don't look like suicides. Japan did not dare to attack the USSR even in a direct alliance with Hitler.
They (unlike you) understand how quickly they will be destroyed in this case.
Australia lost to the ostriches and, in principle, will not participate in a war on another continent.
Don't overestimate yourself. Even England and France will run away from you at the first opportunity. Everyone is already tired of you ;)
@@user-yz9ko1yj2e I’m sorry, did you say something? I was too busy being awesome
Yes
Всю технику НАТО нужно разделить на 8, тогда будет точное сопоставление сил, а пехоту на 10, т.к. у нас и один в поле воин. Учите историю ВОВ натовцы хреновы.
Технику НАТО толкько умножить на 8 можно тк она новее и лучше . Один в поле воин во второй мировой войне при лендлизе США и при поддержки Великобритании и США в Африке Азии и западной Европе
Просто твоей самке нужна белая лада
Russia better hope that Ukraine doesn’t invade them.
@@clarkdavis3588 Massive collection of good condition Russian vehicles, the farmers just wanna collect equipment ! :3
That's true. But Russians are absolute honey badgers if anyone invades their Motherland. They are incompetent militarily but defending their homeland is a different war.
I don't know why they haven't already. They have been handed all the top of the range fire power from other countries - just go and use it!
@@Patracat
USA will not allow them.
Ukraine should. Taking the war home to Russia
And Nato will become even more powerful with Finland and Sweden joining
Who said Sweden is joining? Sweden does not need to, it's been independent since last decades and will stay out of any alliances I "guess".
@@elfillari Sweden is considering on joining. That's all. We'll probably get a response soon from their government.
@@ajcyrilldy Where did you hear from? Your Alaskan neighbors? Maybe it's better to be in Sweden to know why them keep going independent in so many "international crisis"? Because they don't have to involve in those chrisis.
@@elfillari Where did I hear it from? *The Swedish Government.* The responses they gave is not the same as the responses they gave last month when they were keen on not joining at all. They're considering on joining. But they still have to make the final decision on whether they should apply or not.
@@ajcyrilldy All the countries around the Sweden will apply or being already members. Why should Sweden joining and paying four percentage of its turn over to Nato? They will get the same protection thru the borders for free. If Russians want to invade Sweden, they have to cross the border of the Nato country first. Either from east, south, or north side! Such a great geographic situation for this Swedish territory they having!
E quanti missili ipersonici per entrambe?
И это правильный вопрос.
И надо принять во внимание союз России с Китаем и Северной Кореей.
can you do nato vs russia+china
China couldn't care less 😂
China only care about China.
What is the point of that video? Russia cannot conquer a single country that was devastated by previous war, uses mostly their own equipment (Russian, which apparently they can`t counter) and has limited if none air power. Tactics used by Russia appear to be medieval and their "state of the art" (as said by Putin himself a few days ago) equipment made Ukrainian farmers billionaires from scrap. I wonder how they dare to hold nukes when their machinery quality is so mediocre and personnel has no idea of what they`re doing.
I bet 90% of their nukes don’t work. This war has really exposed Russia as a retard state.
The point is most likely. That we all can pray that Nato and Russia will never go to war. Because nukes will be used for sure.
Yes. Russia has no hope whatsoever in a straight up conventional fight. Any force of any size would be vanquished in short order. That’s why they can never be challenged because those crazy (and proud) asshokes wouldn’t hesitate to use nuclear weapons to save themselves or even worse, to save face.
Russians just seem wholly incompetent on every level of life. I’d worry their nukes are degrading as we speak. Nobody over there knows what they’re doing.
Entertainment purposes
Russia can't even stage an invasion from their own border without getting their arse handed to them. No wonder why Putin can't sleep at night hahaha.
they would beat up ukraine if putin could spell tactics lol
Putin ran away after the attack in belgorod, he has been hanging out in the East of Russia. looks like he is dying
They culd but the are fighting Nato alrady by proxy
@@militaristaustrian you think they're fighting NATO by proxy because they said so on Russian TV. Um, no. You better hope you never trigger article 5 or you'll see that what you're facing today has zero resemblance to what would come. Feeding Ukraine tidbits is crushing the Russian army. I'd actually feel sorry for the Russian military if NATO launched an attack. It would be Russia's last war. Ever.
@@alainlefebvre9860 RT IS BLOCKT IN EU, I ONELY GET GERMAN, UKRAINEN AND AMERICAN NEWS
Если Блок НАТО зайдёт в Россию, то будут эшалон с танками аж до самой Камчатки тянуть аж.
Пришло время обновить эти цифры. It's time to update these figures.
Also remember when it says "1 tank", it's just a digit, the vast difference between a 1970s tank and a 2020 tank is a lot different
The vast difference between clowns with fragile toys and veterans in steel monsters is a lot different
5:38 this is a helicopter belonging to poland with polish painting not russian // pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siły_Powietrzne
@@alainstrzyga3474 Yes, but this model of helicopters was created in Russia (more precisely, in the Soviet Union (USSR)) - Mi-24 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-24
Quality is as important as quantity. An old and (not sure if 100% operable) wapon cannot be compared with a new well functionig one
Russian tanks better than western tanks. Historical fact.
Basically Russia is outclassed in EVERY department.
Except false pride and the ability to suffer greatly.
@@socaljarhead7670😭😭. You didn't have to do them that dirty 😂
Actually, I'm afraid they may have more small tactical nukes than NATO
BRILLIANT! HOW ABOUT RUSSIAS STOCKPILE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON'S???
DOES NATO OR THE U.S. OUTCLASS THEM IN THAT DEPT. TOO???
ARE YOU SERIOUS??
Do you have any clue how quickly a "military ground war could escalate between U.S./NATO VS RUSSIA, before RUSSIA unleashes it's highly advanced, Nuclear Missiles, that can evade U.S./NATO defence systems.. Missles aptly dubbed: "SATAN 2 Nuclear Missiles"...?? How does that vast number of military ground troops.. i.e. soldiers from U.S. and NATO, with their state of the art weaponry fight a "Global Thermonuclear War" against RUSSIA and their sophisticated, Missile Technology???
How could they even hope to stop RUSSIA, given the likelihood of that scenario! Where is the common sense???
czcams.com/video/j9kbiXVjeMc/video.html
Don't trust appearances, they can deceive a war is decided by several factors
Мне нравится этот ролик... Реально опозорили весь блок НАТО 💪
Сравнить вторую по мощности державу мира с блоком, в который входит так называемая первая по мощности держава... Это просто шик!!! Лучше и не придумаешь... Ладно бы 🇺🇸 vs 🇷🇺... Но это... 🎉😂😂😂
Quantity does not mean quality. History is the best teacher))
La qualité d’europe et américaine est 100 x supérieur à celle des russes
Ahhh nevermind all that, NATO just needs a fleet of tractors to beat Russia.
hahaha VeRy FuNnY🤤
Comedy Gold Medalist 🏅 🎖 🤣
Finland just sent some tractors to the boarder.
@@fairybeliver180 "armored tractors"
@@nikosmosxos5856 now that's something I'd pay to see
Russia has a superior force of trolls on US social media and no Americans faking being Russians on Russian social media.
*Cuz there isn't Russian social media.
EDGE: Still America, Babe. We see you, Boris.
It's like Empire Strikes Back right? Or perhaps the revival of Anglo-Saxons Empire again?
*The Great Reset*
Are you a NATO or America troll? Just because someone likes Russia does not mean that they are a troll!!
NATO all they way. BTW, I have nothing against normal, kind, loving Russians. It's the brainwashed ones I have a problem with. Would like a world where NATO is not necessary.
i would like to know, maybe you tell us about how safe you feel, how safe is your family, are you worried about them coming after you or your family and friends, the way you tell it about Putin, i bet he will not be happy with you, what happened to your houses in Russia, did they confiscate them. All this would make an interesting video, just as was your video about fleeing Russia. Keep safe. love from UK
And why didn't they show the nuclear warheads? You can also compare the army of the BRICS countries with the army of Lithuania, for example.
These comparison videos are made all the time and it's refreshing to see people come to their senses about them.
NATO: "Peace through superior Firepower" Amen to that.
The comparison is legit whatever opinion u may have about Russia or nato
Yeah your insane if you think Italy alone could take them Ukraine was the strongest country on the continent if they can’t beat them no 1 country can except china or usa
Доказательство, что НАТО это агрессор . Ливия, Ирак, югославия
@@Trill-Is-Real Без поддержки НАТО - война в украине давно бы уже закончилась
They put the numbers in material matters, but forgot to mention that battle is fought with spirit.
Exactly. Also not to mention the proper level of training needed for a well functioning force. These things make the bigger differences
@@arjenhuytker this is not ww1,no matter how big spirit you are, with a scream of uraaa!! or whatever, will be ez grind with excalibur, avenger, stingray, or reaper drone, because they can be driven while drinking coffee from the base
You mean Russians drink spirit?
No, he means the cocaine spirit of the little dictator who sold his country to NATO. If you know what I mean ;)
Missing the ultrasonic missiles...
BRAVO.
Russia got lucky ukraine barely has an air force. The us air force would've had demolished all their tanks
Just imagine what a squadron of A-10s could have done to that miles long, stopped or slowly moving, convoy. Can you say, "Highway of Death II!"
Would be so saddisfying
czcams.com/video/1g9EXIaKAIE/video.html
@@tfp0052 Target rich environment.
russia also was lucky that ukraine was the poorest country in europe 🤣 if the poorest european country is doing what it's doing to such top military power and right next to the closest border of the developed russian zone... i cant imagine what a rich ukraine could have done lmao (in both cases with western's help)
More than in the numbers of vehicles and men, the difference lies in the war material, and its reliability in the first place ........ After the training of the military, both technical and operational. But last but not least, the logistic support, very important for the well-being of the personnel on the battlefield. A greeting
it is very honest to compare a number of countries with one Russia.The correct solution would be to compare NATO and the Warsaw Pact
1 vs 31 countries.. amazing
usa > russia 1vs1
honestly im amazed how big russia military is. its virtually half the size of nato in certain category. but theres no way in hell it can take on an empire if they cant handle 1 country
Only on paper, most of it is not operational.
@@mr.t993 and they really can’t fix or buy anything because of sanctions
Because no one wants to completely destroy Ukraine. A huge number of mass weapons are not used (and this is not about nuclear weapons) The purpose of this war is to capture Ukraine with a minimum number of victims from both sides. And also try to preserve the infrastructure as much as possible
Вам напомнить как мы гоняли вас в Сирии? Россия могла за 2 дня просто разбомбить Украины как вы это сделали с Югославией , но мы страна миротворец и до вашего уровня падать не будем , это не война , а спецоперация , было послано 1\10 армии , цель защита граждан Донбаса
they took more then 30% of ukraine only with 100k troops
It's nice to see that one "poor" country, Russia, is compared in power with a whole bloc of 30 countries. And Russia's potential is not so much losing.
hahahah, it's literally losing to 1 country Ukraine, your country is pathetic
Russia and Nato peace 4 ever❤❤
We already saw this potential in Ukraine
Надеюсь, Россия станет страной побогаче, как минимум, что бы не уступала остальным в производстве микроэлектроники. Когда изобретут российский литограф? Надеюсь, в ближайшие 10 лет
@@egarinka typicl russian excuses🤣🤣 Kiev for 3 days🤣
Damn comparison of 1 country against two whole continents 😅
Well too be fair Russia is the same size.......
@@biglebowski5737 nato more than 800,000,000 people, rusia 145,000,000 people, 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@UniversalVideosAll ....so?
А смысл подсчëтов? Если реально столкнутся две армии, то и так понятно кого уничтожат под Москвой.
В спойлерах не смысла)
Не кого не уничтожат , нато просто перестанет существовать , ведь стоит только дернутся нато начнется ядерная война , и не одно пво нато не в силах уничтожить ядерные России
Рашку естественно.
@@user-rm7gt4ne2d Врятли Сербия присоединится к этому конфликту.
А Сербия тут причём, или ты про украпарашку изгоев что ли ну да наверное@@user-rm7gt4ne2d
Because of war in Ukraine NATO boosting military spending. Number of equipment might double up over the next few years.
In first, it's even not possible to survive without cheap Russian gas and Oil for the Whole EU and America, so it will be a miracle if NATO survives a Apocalypse, let's pray for those NATO countries
Yeah they have disturbed the hornet's nest.
@@brucetaylor4118 not true. The USA was importing only 5% from Russia. That is now zero. The alliance will get to the point of using zero fossil fuels from Russia ASAP. Dependent ATM, yes, but they have learned their lesson. Considering America is the lion's share of the alliance's military power, it will be capable of getting the job done by itself if necessary. Remove Putin and maybe the world can live in peace for a change. But if you really want to test our resolve, then go for it. There is NO winning scenario for Russia. And before you threaten it, nuclear is not the answer either. Like I said, there is no winning scenario for Russia.
@@brucetaylor4118 Wrong the US can become oil independent in 6 months.
And it's all for politics and to kill incident people in another banker war
The Russians would have a little more cash if they weren't buying 300 million-dollar yachts
Your right they are all corrupt. The poor soldiers get wiped out the fat cats got big boats .
they are very important . escorts,yachts and football teams . all important stuff to have around
Haha. All those yachts are in USA's hands along with over $100/billion seized. Ha ha. F Russia
Yes but it is domestic affair of Russia (corruption etc)
США самая коррумпированная страна в мире.
Also missing the comparison on the number of bottles of vodka.
We are talking about 30country vs one country🎉
No comparison. NATO takes it easily
Lol Solo vs squad 🤣🤣😂 no fear
Yes… NATO is really good at “Military Exercises”?????
@@CHAMUNGER only 1 vs 1 don't gang up 😂😂😂
lol China will Back Russia then it will be interesting
@@michaelgibbons6273 lmao China wont enter the war. They would had incredibile losses from war.
Even if, they would still lost 😂
And China aint that dumb as russia, They atleast think.
You can't compare a country against an alliance, but if you do, you need to know that Russia is not alone😉😏
Who want to team up wit a country that soon will collapse?.
Точняк. Забыли копья Эритреи посчитать 😄
NATO isn't alone either south Korea, Taiwan, Australia,New Zealand, Austria, Vietnam, Mexico, Egypt, Ireland, Moldova, Sweden, Mongolia and many others will back up NAtO
@@DeltasquadformingupMongólia, vietname = 🇷🇺
@@Olgarina_do_rosario17 no they won't they have no reason to support Russia and have constant disputes with China
The fact that we compare one country vs half of the world union is a total win for Russia
@@pneuma2260 and NATO is only supplying few things hahaahahahaha is funny to see these comments now
Así le va en Ucrania jajaja y es Ucrania, imagínate con el resto jajaja.... Lo que hace la ignorancia
@@pneuma2260 Ирак, Вьетнам
Yea the Russian army works like a charm these days
not really...We all know Russian troops are poorly trained and the up keep of weapons for the Russians are subpar. The U.S. alone would crush them after being exposed by Ukraine.
SEATO was an alliance of USA, UK, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, Taiwan and others it now has been upgraded to a new alliance. South East Asian Treaty Organisation.
If this was football, Nato would be Liverpool Football Club and Russia would be Accrington Stanley.
Why would you want to insult Accrington Stanley ?
@@ejcm55 : Agree, I think that's rude right?
Hey whats wrong with Accrington Stanley !!!!!
@@fisherking1863 Nothing. Their motto is "Who are they".
Accrington whatever they be didn't invaded no one...
Also it will be a football team against a ping pong double team.
Correction : Russian number of naval vessels minus one !
Correction Russian number one Submarine plus 🤣
It's more than one taken out of action
Do Serbia vs Nato
Misiles hipersonicos?
This video is seriously dated. Russia's reserves of tanks, armored vehicles, attack helicopters and soldiers are precipitously dropping every day in Ukraine. Time to revise your data for Russia downward.
@K D'Arcy not to mention they have no parts to fix these days🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Russia only has 2500/3500 tanks ( working ) The rest is scrap metal lol.
@K D'Arcy Well it could be used. There using junk now. Maybe they would have to tow there tanks into battle with farm tractors.
Old tanks from 12.000 only 2000 are functionally.
Split this to another zones of Russia ....
So many aircrafts and still no air superiority.
Admiral ship taken down with lower rackets technology.
Only "useless" nuclear weapons are real threat but I guess many also are only on paper in order to justify the stealing money hidden under name of " military buget".
EU paid for that heavy arms lost
Numbers are not everything. Qualify of the equipment and training are a key factor.
way to kick Russia while their down...
@@dylanmahanets6603 😂🤣😂 *most underrated comment wow
@@roddy6924 it gets even worse when u relise it doesn't taker into account fuel or food supply... imagine having to fight a war and live of rations that exspired in 2015...
@@dylanmahanets6603 unfortunately I didn't see tactical nukes compared, maybe i missed it though
Yes wich russia do not have
Does everyone remember the downed stealth bomber in Yugoslavia? Moreover, the ancient system of which was 30 years old. You can recall the sold f-35s that started to rust in a year.Or the cool Patriots who missed the attacks of homemade rockets
The Chinese spy ballons.....🎈🎈🎈🗽🤣😭
And rocket cruiser "Moscow", and Leopards...
Ναι και μάλιστα ζήτησαν συγνώμη που το κατέρριψαν γιατί δεν ήξεραν ότι είναι αόρατο 😂😂😂😂 Ζήτω ο μεγάλος ηγέτης Πούτιν και η μεγάλη Ρωσία
bro you are comparing a country with a military organization, if you are going to do that then include china,belarus,iran and other allied countries with russia
I think the average Russian citizen would be surprised to learn that there military doesn't even come close to nato
The nukes do
@@ssww3 do russias nukes even work- lol
@@joemama-kl1xm idk and I don't to find out
@@joemama-kl1xm Say that to the TSAR BOMBA
Lmao
@@johnwick6831 only one made
After watching Russian military in action. No Russian can tell me they're the most powerful. Nato would absolutely destroy Russia.
Maybe so, but u think China is just gonna look on with its arms folded?
@@tonyrodd6348 china wouldn't go to war with Europe or US. We buy alot of goods from them.
@@DANNY-bv7od Hahah lol China has already banned the supply to most NATO countries
Ahahaha lol you compared 30 countries and 1 country, the Russian army is on the 2nd place in the world and Russia would have captured Ukraine long ago if the Ukrainian military had not captured civilians in Ukraine
@@tonyrodd6348
jepp the chinese troops would conquer Siberia.
It's mostly about the quality, not the quantity.
Do a new video of now and see what the difference is
Байден сказал что у НАТО кончились артиллерийские боеприпасы поэтому они дадут Украине кластерные снаряды
Secretary general Jens Stoltenberg* is not NATO's "leader" as he has almost no power over the organisation. He is basically only its official civil representative. And there is no such thing as "aircrafts" since the plural of aircraft is also "aircraft".
Some figures are wrong … NATO doesn’t have just 96 special mission aircrafts… the USA alone has 772 lol
the most of data is wrong
most of the stuff in this video either complitely wrong or partially false information
i was worrying about that thx
@@scootjeboschwi5352 no just no
Das wichtigste in der Aufzählung sind die Atomraketen und die atom uboote und da haben beide genug sich hundertfach auszulöschen
"strategic bombers" Shows a euro typhoon
which is a jet not a bomber
Might need a recount of the russian inventory.
True say!
Why? Nato lost more they don’t even have ammunition. 😂😂😂
@@Mcorpmike yeah and russia lost the war
@@Michael-mk6sm did they? as far as i know they keep moving at Kiev.
@@Mcorpmike where did you get this information? even Kremlin news isn't saying this? besides that, call me a traitor all you want, but im all for Легион Свобода России in Белгородская Область...
Russia puts fashion over form.
NATO puts form over fashion.
And somehow NATO still wins in the fashion department
Please schoe me Bricks vs Nato. Please
Не надо забывать про Китай, Белорусь и Северную Корею
Everytime Pootler lost a barehanded fighting, he brought up a knife to threat people! That tactic won 't work anymore .
May there be peace among all countries. War only leads to suffering of the people.🙏
a like on the wisest comment in this entire selection
Well said, that is my point too.
Yes but if you dont protect your nation how will you stop agression. War is a must. If only russians learn that they are not compatible for world dominnce. I mean russians themselves dont buy putins shit
They only want all people suffer
@@cap9719 Who?
I know this is one year old, but that one country called Russia seems to be spanking all the other ones,
А можно теперь страны СНГ vs НАТО
Nato has quality and quantity 👌
De semmit se ér. NATO hadsereg katonáit csak a pénz motiválja.
A NATO gépek is =0.
Мы вас всех убьем
@@-lismore-9122Russians didn't defeat them either.
In actuality, Russia probably had no more than 6,000 serviceable tanks before the war began in Ukraine - the other 6000 that exist are irreparable, hell, Russia still has some WW2 T-34 tanks in its reserve.
Those are old, and unusable.
Actually , closer to 2500 before the invasion.
Probably just like all their equipment, I'd cut all the numbers given here for USABLE Russian assets by at least a third
Honestly even 2,500 is optimistic judging by their maintenance standards. With more than 500 confirmed losses their total operational tank force is most certainly well below the 2,000 mark now.
I also wonder if those personnel numbers are pre-war as well, because they've got no less than 15-20,000 KIA at this point and 2-3x that wounded so total losses have to be well past 50,000 now.By May 9th their KIA count might actually exceed US KIA's in the Korean War (Which would put the Ruso-Ukrainian War in the Top 5 Most KIAs on the US list, behind only the World Wars, the Civil War, and Vietnam).
Its probably around 3k operable tanks but thats still a lot... Uk and Germany have combined 500-550 tanks so its still very impresive...
Before or after the russia-ukraine war. Makes a big difference
The difference is not big, because in 2-3 years Russia will be able to restore all its losses with newer equipment
@@MeikZoo stay in your sweet dream, whatever happen
@@vanessalucie8443 It’s you who stay in your dreams if you think that Russia is suffering incomparable losses in Ukraine, even now Russia produces 1500-1600 tanks a year, which allows it to cover losses in Ukraine in 2-3 years
Und woher kommt das Geld für die Teile und woher kommen die Teile und woher kommen die Leute die die Panzer bauen etc. ? Und lass dir deine Zahlen mal von einem Militärexperten bestätigen.
@Meikzoo they dont produce 1000 tanks pero year. The only thing they do is refurbish old Soviet-era tanks that they have in storage. 🤣
In Russia, in addition to weapons, there are Pushkin, Tchaikovsky, Dostoevsky. The world's first artificial heart was made in Russia. Russia is Mendeleev, Tsiolkovsky, Kurchatov, Repin, ballet, cosmos, and Veliky Novgorod is 1159 years old. Russia is a self-sufficient independent state with a centuries-old culture honoring nobility and honesty.
Mhm, and we had Nykäsen Matti, Lordi and Nokia. You know, that artificial heart was made because of calls made with Nokia phones. And what comes to honesty and all that culture? Well, the current dictator of Russia is taking crap on all of it, throwing the whole country into madness. And how is Russia self-sufficient when you need to order dishwashers to be disassembled to harvest the parts?? :D Self-sufficiency is a matter of perspective, sure you can wipe your ass with your hand and call yourself self-sufficient, doesn't make it that glamorous tho. Pushkin and the rest are ashamed of what Russia is doing at the moment, screwing up their legacy.
@@Al-hx6pc строчки Пушкина -Куда отдвинем строй твердынь?
За Буг, до Ворсклы, до Лимана?
За кем останется Волынь?
За кем наследие Богдана?
Признав мятежные права,
От нас отторгнется ль Литва?
Наш Киев дряхлый, златоглавый,
Сей пращур русских городов,
Сроднит ли с буйною Варшавой
Святыню всех своих гробов?
Ваш бурный шум и хриплый крик
Смутили ль русского владыку?
Скажите, кто главой поник?
Кому венец: мечу иль крику?
Сильна ли Русь? Война, и мор,
И бунт, и внешних бурь напор
Ее, беснуясь, потрясали -
Смотрите ж: всё стоит она!
А вкруг ее волненья пали -
И Польши участь решена…
@@Al-hx6pc Александр Пушкин
Бородинская годовщина
Russia is an aggressor that must get out of the territory of Ukraine. Russia is a barbarian who brings death and destruction
Russia is nothing special compared to other countries. Other countries have poets and musicians as well. And other countries have invented things too. The first car was made in Germany, computers and the Internet where invented in the United Staates.... Russia is nothing compared to that.
They work hard to look relevant. I reality Russia have the second best army in Ukraine.... China is the other superpower. Still a long shot away from dominance though. Russia could still give China a run for their money if they would like to try.
2nd best army in Ukraine... and we ( NATO) aren't even in the fight yet ..
Putin knows he cant match us..
Imagine if China went for land grabs in Russia.
China’s power is all propaganda.
Research has been done and shows that there military is a lot worse off.
Even compared to Russia’s failure in Ukraine.
China is a lot worse then that.
China just knows how to lie, steal and talk very loud.
But they have absolutely no substance to back any of it up.
Why else would China need the politicaly over exaggerated Coronavirus (given to them by Angel of Death Anthony Fauci) to overthrow the
United States of America Federal Government.
Democrats are part of the CCP after all, and look how those treasonous bozos are doing.
They fit perfectly with China, there owners.
Don’t be afraid of these paper threats (China and Russia) and any who work for them.
Democrats in America, Macron in France and the Labor part in Britain.
There all hot air with no substance.
Let’s free the world of all these Globalist crap heads.
Death to the Left.
@@Fred-eg9sx resources…nothing the Russians could do about it.
Sorry, but with all their Made in China military equipment....I think China's military would be broken after 48hrs in the field lol
There's no way you could compare Russia with NATO, Russia should be compared to African countries because Russia's fighting is very primitive, it's 2022 but still using 70's riffles, still running out of fuel.
War is not how many soldiers, but knowledge.
Please don’t insult African counties like that.
@@jamesb95 I'm in Uganda, east Africa)
@@aileronhelicopters you could beat russia too🤣😂🤭
@@BeardedBavarianBiker. agree, incase there's a war between him, after being defeated will show strength by using Nukes
@@aileronhelicopters I think one of his generals (or cooks) would pop him on the temple before he got that far. 🤞
a country vs the unification of countries, somehow wrong, can at least CSTO vs NATO or RF vs USA?
Россию сравнивают с коалицией стран.) запомните, воевать против нато будет не только одна Россия. В такой масштабной войне обязательно будут образовываться коалиции.
С нами походу только Беларусь и Сирия будут
@@smachnaya_bebra2006🇨🇳 🇹🇲 🇰🇬 🇺🇿 🇹🇯 🇲🇳 korea n 🇻🇳 🇱🇦 🇸🇾 ira 🇻🇪 🇨🇺 And countries in africa
Как клеить "можем повторить" и "на Берлин" на свои машины, как надрачивать в патриотическом экстазе на Вашингтон в радиоактивном пепле, как ставить НАТО ультиматумы и требовать изменений их статута - так это пожалуйста.
А как сравнивать по существу - так это нечестно. Бедная россиюшка одна, а их много.
А воевать с вами против НАТО пойдёт в самом лучшем случае Иран, Сирия, КНДР, Беларусь и Эритрея. Тот еще клуб кривых и убогих.
Никарагуа впишеться полюбасу
Are we seriously comparing the strength of combined 30 countries vis-à-vis one country?🤔
Putin needs to learn and understand Russia is not a superpower.
We can compare USA and russia
@@sk4klp727 sorry, one very important nuance. the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If there is a direct clash between Russia and NATO, I think China and India, and other countries dissatisfied with the United States, will take part against the West. After all, they understand that if Russia loses, they will be next, and already in that ratio the chances will be less than before. So, your statistics don't give the real picture. and these are completely different figures and no longer in the direction of the west.
@@sk4klp727 Yea, this would be fairer. If we were to compare NATO to something we would need to compare it to China+Russia+India
It would seem so..
It’s still impressively scary. This is a whole alliance VS russia alone.
Yes, but this comparison doesn't take into account the training, morale, experience, logistics, tactics, etc that the Russian troops have compared to the west. Some of the numbers may even be counting irreparable Russian utilities, meaning that their amount of any number shown in the video could be significantly higher.
If they cant capture a country anymore, I doubt they can go against NATO.
We'll see who's who... CZcams Compilations Don't Win the Fighting. Good video...
most of the nato countries have tiny land armies of a couple thousand troops . most of natos power is from usa uk france and germany
@@apollo-eu4fkNumbers don’t mean much in this age.
The Famous Leader "Jens Stogltenberg"
😂
5:36 dlaczego na helikopterze sił rosyjskich jest logo polskich sił powietrznych?
bo twórca tego materiału jest mocno pierdolnięty i wyciągnął dane z dupy i zdjęcia też
At the end of the day, if NATO feels threatened, it's always welcome to become a member of UKRAINE.
You made my day with a smile
Stop see TV
Yes. Ukrainians are proven warriors. Russia rolled into a hornets nest.
if it wasint for nato ukraine would already be steamrolled
@@Justintdot Yep, True. And NATO hasn't really done that much. Well trained the Ukrainians and gave them a few Javelins and NLAW. Putin maybe able to BS his citizens but he can't BS the troops and officers. They know how good there equipment and troops are compared to the opposition. And you can bet the news will get out.
The speed of movement of mechanized divisions of the Wehrmacht and the Red Army across the enemy territory during World War 2 is 20-30 km per day, in the zone of active hostilities 1-2 km per day.
which were helped by us 5-tons. especially during the battle of kirsk
@@raymacleod6370 Red Army Mechanized Corps 1943: 3 rifle brigades, 1 tank brigade, 2 regiments of self-propelled artillery units(SAU), etc. Red Army Tank Brigade, 53 tanks: 20 tanks - a T-60 tank (5 tons) and a T-70 tank (9 tons), etc. 2 Regiments of SAU(hard,medium or light regiments): 12(152mm), 16(122mm), 20(76mm) SAUs+1 command tank.
In WW2 the both sides of the fronts has +- 10.000.000 troops. In Ukraine +- 500.000
NATO IS IN MATRIX I WILL DESTROY NATO
NATO IS TOO OBESE LIKE 10 PERCENT FIT FOR SERVICE RUSSIA HAS 44 PERCENT FIT FOR SERVICE
Air defense systems were not included. :/
For all the military experts in the comments, conquering a country comes with COMPLETELY different Problems than an all out war. The US should know that since Vietnam
@@PaPyRene Exactly my point
@@CptUhudini Putin hat ein großen Fehler gemacht.
@@user-fp5wz3hl1u Definitiv. Ich glaube zwar immernoch, dass Russland diesen Krieg gewinnen wird aber das wird ihn EINIGES kosten
@@PaPyRene what problems russia have there? took more then 30% of ukraine with only 100k troops, not bad
Vietnam was half a world away. Ukraine literally borders Russia. You think the logistic of invading vietnam is even remotely as easy as Ukraine?
Это все с учетом потерь за полотора последних года?
А в чем потери? В том что крейсер взорвали? 😁
@@stanislavsss1363 Смешной однако
So you're saying they're hopelessly outgunned
Можно было просто сравнить ядерное оружие, после него ни одной, ни другой стороны уже не будет :)
Not actually true. Russia would be gone but many nato countries would not be hit. No radiation would reach a large area of the southern hemisphere.
Армия России уступает армии НАТО но не так сильно как военный бюджет 😂
@@tclanjtopsom4846 Why do we need such a world if there will be no Russia?
@@dzelat5849 World without russia = dream world 🌍🌎
Well said brother, the fools think it is a game, but winter is coming and we shall see what surprises it will bring them. Mother Russia will prevail, you have the whole normal world with you. 🇷🇺🇲🇰🇷🇺
Think the main difference is the modernity (in general) of NATO army compared with russian...
only thing modern is uk and usa :D
And constant training
@@rustama.h1913 I think Canada's finally going to start replacing our old fighter jets with F-35's. 👍
@@rustama.h1913 try to never mesestime your ennemy, its the safer way to win a war....
Bastian
@@felixluisocasio8948 you are completely right, 4 ex. the flying's hours of the pilots are essentials for real the goal, and russian's pilots have less than a third (in the better situation) than us.....not mentionned the advance of fighters tech.
But its important not to underestime their capabilities....its safer, at least.