Cannot express my gratitude for your wonderfull work you give to the world. It is uplifting humanity from its unawareness and pooring light into God's Being in us, who is only Light, but hides to discover that Happiness. Thank you Alan, thank you Rupert, you must be free living souls and wanting to share your Light. .. 💎☀️💞
THANKYOU GURUJI🙏🌹 IT'S MORE CLEAR NOW, THAT WE ARE ONLY DIFFERENT BY THINKING THROUGH OUR MIND'S. BUT WHEN WE COME TO THAT RECOGNITION OF THAT BLANKNESS WITHIN US, WE CAN LIVE WITH THAT THOUGHT THAT WE ALL ARE "ONE". AND AFTER THIS RECOGNITION WE CAN MAKE OURSELVES REMEMBER THROUGHOUT OUR EXPERIENCES TILL WE COMPLETELY ABIDE IN KNOWING.
What we feel as awareness is life it is awareness with centre but there is another empty absolute eternal undivided without centre awareness which is my being and nobody can ever feel it.life is awareness in action which at last will become being aware of awareness.
All these videos and all the comments beneath every video and all these seemingly different body-minds who made the videos and gave the comments and yet one awareness in which all of it appears. And I am that 💞
Rupert says that the awareness we essentially are is unlimited, but that is not my experience. There are people now walking in central London that I am not aware of. I am only aware of what appears in the field of ‘my’ awareness, which I could agree includes my body, thoughts etc. But, if I stay close to my experience, the only things that exist are what I currently know. If I phoned someone walking in London now and they described the street and their experience I would then be aware of them in some capacity. So, either awareness is limited to the current known experience or nothing else exists outside of it, in which case, there is no one walking the streets of London right now, they are only walking the streets at the moment it enters my awareness. So, at the moment I phone them, but right now there is no one. Either that, or awareness is limited to me here, and other awarenesses are operating elsewhere independently. If there is one homogeneous awareness, then it does not seem to know itself in its entirety. I suppose you could say that the one awareness knows itself completely, but the separate subjects (us individuals) only know a limited viewpoint, which would again mean its limited (at least from the viewpoint of the ‘i’). it’s very confusing, even trying to conceptualise it into a coherent theory, let alone living it.
You're right, we can only ever know, what seems to be our awareness. There is no way to know if anyone else has awareness. But we feel it is dangerous to say ,"my awareness is all there is and everyone else is merely a perception" because we know mind is limited. Mind in Rupert's definition is just an activity so it seems acceptable to presume there are other activities of mind. All activities of mind are of course, made only of the one reality, awareness. Love is the hint that there are other activities of mind.
This is right, it seems that we have a limited viewpoint but also,somehow ,the one reality of so called diferent minds is confirmed so many times in your lives when we connect at a deeper level with other subjects and thought comes in and interpret it afterwards, yet the knowing was there all along. It happens to me all the time in relation to people and situations but is hard to be explained ,the only thing is the undeniable existence of one reality, ever present which kind of connects all the pieces.
Awareness is not limited, your perceptions, sensations, thoughts and feelings are limited. If awareness is limited, where are its supposed limits? Where does it end? Where is it located? Not in space, not in time. It is here, now, infinitely, eternally. The knowing itself has no limits. Equating awareness to the limitations of the body’s perceptions is like the character in the movie saying it is not a part of the unlimited screen because it’s separate self feels limited. It’s only reality is, in this analogy, the unlimited screen.
Alan, it's when others are thrown into the mix that the teaching starts to feel more like a "teaching" rather than direct experience. Awareness or knowing isn't limited by the body-mind, e.g., I don't see through eyes or think through a mind. It's not "my" knowing; it's just knowing, unlimited. If this seeming body-mind doesn't perceive, then why assume that other seeming body-minds do? I don't want to deny what others express as their experience. As you said in reply to another comment here, that feels dangerous or wrong. But at the same time, if I don't know of something, then why assume that it exists? I feel that if I give in to that assumption, then the entire direct experience-based model crumbles and any assumption can be taken for granted.
I don't agree that any assumption can be taken for granted as an outcome of taking apparent others-other viewpoints,same knowing-as being a possibility. We're not adding a new category-not assuming something not experienced-we are simply saying that there may be more mind activities like mine. The five senses (mind activity) are what knowing looks like from a 'second viewpoint' perspective. Don't forget the seeing of apparent others is not seeing independent discreet entities, it is allowing for the possibility that there may be more than one viewpoint of the one. In saying this, as long as the single knowing is not thought of as Steve's knowing (which I know you don't) then the result is the same :).
@@alanneachell9092 "The five senses (mind activity) are what knowing looks like from a 'second viewpoint' perspective." Could you explain this a bit more? Not sure I understand what you mean. Thanks Al :)
@@stevenl.5490 There is a reality which we could describe as a field of potentiality (nothing has happened yet). Mind activity-the five senses-extract from potentiality, an apparent world which coincides with seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling and touching. In other words the five senses are the world. Imagine you are tasting a piece of chocolate while a doctor is measuring your brains response to that taste. The doctor experiences a second person viewpoint that looks like a graph on a monitor. Your direct experience is the taste of chocolate. The apparent world of things is like the graph on the monitor. Direct experience is like the taste of chocolate. All of this is only applicable if we are allowing for multiple viewpoints. Im not comfortable with limiting God to a single viewpoint. Its true that we can have the experience of absolute aloneness-it can be overwhelming sometimes in meditation- but that aloneness would be experienced by all view points because all view points are viewpoints of the one. Great questions Steve. You are making me go deeper.
I will be uploading every two weeks for a short time, while I collect new material
Cannot express my gratitude for your wonderfull work you give to the world. It is uplifting humanity from its unawareness and pooring light into God's Being in us, who is only Light, but hides to discover that Happiness. Thank you Alan, thank you Rupert, you must be free living souls and wanting to share your Light. .. 💎☀️💞
Thanks 💕
Thank you 😊
Your work it's amazing, the time you need it is the "perfect time"! ...thank you!
I repeat, like many others, anxiously waiting for your wonderful work. Thanks also from Italy and I'm sorry if there's any mistake in writing
Wonderful stuff Alan. I have listened to every one of your compilations multiple times and never get tired of them. Thank you for this.
Thanks for your comment James 💕🙏
Thank you.
Appreciation. Appreciation. Appreciation.
I reside and abide in the pure, unfiltered, everlasting self
Thank you so much for this gifts. May peace be with u always
Absolutely beautiful.
Your another contribution to the humanity. No words I find, to thank you. But still thank you
Thank you! 🙏
I have no words to express my gratitude for such profound & wonderful teachings. Thanks alot
🙏
Just marvelous 🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷
Thank you Raj 🙏
Thank you soo much, again and again, for sharing 🙏
So beautiful and so simple to just know we are pure peace and joy
Thank you Alan !!! Namaste beautiful soul
Namaste 🙏
Alan, thank you so much once again for taking the time o prepare this and bringing it to your audience, I am very grateful! 🙏🙏
💕
(again ) I can only say: fantàstic compilation ... ♡ it ! And - again - thank you só much for your beautiful 'collections' !!
Thanks 💕
such blessings you so lovingly present
pure food for the soul Thankyou and Rupert so much 💗🙏💗
Thank you for these wonderful collections. Deeply appreciate your work
🙏💕
Alan, thank you from the bottom of my heart for this ! This is so great !
💕
THANKYOU GURUJI🙏🌹
IT'S MORE CLEAR NOW, THAT WE ARE ONLY DIFFERENT BY THINKING THROUGH OUR MIND'S. BUT WHEN WE COME TO THAT RECOGNITION OF THAT BLANKNESS WITHIN US, WE CAN LIVE WITH THAT THOUGHT THAT WE ALL ARE "ONE". AND AFTER THIS RECOGNITION WE CAN MAKE OURSELVES REMEMBER THROUGHOUT OUR EXPERIENCES TILL WE COMPLETELY ABIDE IN KNOWING.
Bless you Alan. 😊
Thank you 😊
Thanks, Alan. 💚💚💚
💕
“The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” H. D. Thoreau
A very telling quote.
i have always felt the same not matter what has occured. I have never changed
What we feel as awareness is life it is awareness with centre but there is another empty absolute eternal undivided without centre awareness which is my being and nobody can ever feel it.life is awareness in action which at last will become being aware of awareness.
Being aware of being aware is a non phenomenal experience but it IS known.
Cheers Alan. Rupert is the best one.
He's very clear, yes 🙏
Much love Alan from Ireland ❣❣
Thank you
Thank you Alan.
Very welcome 🙏
“Perfect “ 🙏
Thank you so much Alan 🙏
🙏
All these videos and all the comments beneath every video and all these seemingly different body-minds who made the videos and gave the comments and yet one awareness in which all of it appears. And I am that 💞
💕
This is the best, alan. Hahaa, thank you. 🌹
Thank you 💕
Just great💥🎉✊✨✨✨
🙏
❤❤
All subbed now
Rupert says that the awareness we essentially are is unlimited, but that is not my experience. There are people now walking in central London that I am not aware of. I am only aware of what appears in the field of ‘my’ awareness, which I could agree includes my body, thoughts etc. But, if I stay close to my experience, the only things that exist are what I currently know. If I phoned someone walking in London now and they described the street and their experience I would then be aware of them in some capacity. So, either awareness is limited to the current known experience or nothing else exists outside of it, in which case, there is no one walking the streets of London right now, they are only walking the streets at the moment it enters my awareness. So, at the moment I phone them, but right now there is no one. Either that, or awareness is limited to me here, and other awarenesses are operating elsewhere independently. If there is one homogeneous awareness, then it does not seem to know itself in its entirety. I suppose you could say that the one awareness knows itself completely, but the separate subjects (us individuals) only know a limited viewpoint, which would again mean its limited (at least from the viewpoint of the ‘i’). it’s very confusing, even trying to conceptualise it into a coherent theory, let alone living it.
You're right, we can only ever know, what seems to be our awareness. There is no way to know if anyone else has awareness. But we feel it is dangerous to say ,"my awareness is all there is and everyone else is merely a perception" because we know mind is limited. Mind in Rupert's definition is just an activity so it seems acceptable to presume there are other activities of mind.
All activities of mind are of course, made only of the one reality, awareness. Love is the hint that there are other activities of mind.
This is right, it seems that we have a limited viewpoint but also,somehow ,the one reality of so called diferent minds is confirmed so many times in your lives when we connect at a deeper level with other subjects and thought comes in and interpret it afterwards, yet the knowing was there all along. It happens to me all the time in relation to people and situations but is hard to be explained ,the only thing is the undeniable existence of one reality, ever present which kind of connects all the pieces.
Awareness is not limited, your perceptions, sensations, thoughts and feelings are limited. If awareness is limited, where are its supposed limits? Where does it end? Where is it located? Not in space, not in time. It is here, now, infinitely, eternally. The knowing itself has no limits. Equating awareness to the limitations of the body’s perceptions is like the character in the movie saying it is not a part of the unlimited screen because it’s separate self feels limited. It’s only reality is, in this analogy, the unlimited screen.
👍🇩🇪
Thanks Alan and Rupert, you are both so helpfull
16:30 yes
I've got to remember to question my thoughts, not to readily believe them.
@@bethanienaylor the Byron Katie stuff is great for that
@@alanneachell9092 thanks I will check them out
@@alanneachell9092 I like her. Thanks for sharing!
The guy at 27.00 is the host of Occult of Personality podcast. I'm fairly certain...
Oh! I don't know
Alan, it's when others are thrown into the mix that the teaching starts to feel more like a "teaching" rather than direct experience.
Awareness or knowing isn't limited by the body-mind, e.g., I don't see through eyes or think through a mind. It's not "my" knowing; it's just knowing, unlimited. If this seeming body-mind doesn't perceive, then why assume that other seeming body-minds do?
I don't want to deny what others express as their experience. As you said in reply to another comment here, that feels dangerous or wrong. But at the same time, if I don't know of something, then why assume that it exists? I feel that if I give in to that assumption, then the entire direct experience-based model crumbles and any assumption can be taken for granted.
I don't agree that any assumption can be taken for granted as an outcome of taking apparent others-other viewpoints,same knowing-as being a possibility.
We're not adding a new category-not assuming something not experienced-we are simply saying that there may be more mind activities like mine. The five senses (mind activity) are what knowing looks like from a 'second viewpoint' perspective.
Don't forget the seeing of apparent others is not seeing independent discreet entities, it is allowing for the possibility that there may be more than one viewpoint of the one.
In saying this, as long as the single knowing is not thought of as Steve's knowing (which I know you don't) then the result is the same :).
@@alanneachell9092 "The five senses (mind activity) are what knowing looks like from a 'second viewpoint' perspective." Could you explain this a bit more? Not sure I understand what you mean. Thanks Al :)
@@stevenl.5490 There is a reality which we could describe as a field of potentiality (nothing has happened yet).
Mind activity-the five senses-extract from potentiality, an apparent world which coincides with seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling and touching.
In other words the five senses are the world.
Imagine you are tasting a piece of chocolate while a doctor is measuring your brains response to that taste.
The doctor experiences a second person viewpoint that looks like a graph on a monitor. Your direct experience is the taste of chocolate.
The apparent world of things is like the graph on the monitor. Direct experience is like the taste of chocolate.
All of this is only applicable if we are allowing for multiple viewpoints.
Im not comfortable with limiting God to a single viewpoint.
Its true that we can have the experience of absolute aloneness-it can be overwhelming sometimes in meditation- but that aloneness would be experienced by all view points because all view points are viewpoints of the one.
Great questions Steve. You are making me go deeper.