Gravity-1 rocket explained
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 01. 2024
- The Gravity-1 rocket (引力-1号, Yinli-1, YL-1) is a large solid-fuelled orbital launch vehicle, designed by OrienSpace (东方空间, Oriental Space) to launch payloads of up to 6.5 tons to low-Earth orbit (LEO), up to 4.2 tons to a 500km Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) or up to 3.7 tons to a 700km SSO.
Credit: China Central Television (CCTV)/China Global Television Network (CGTN)/OrienSpace - Věda a technologie
Tis very Kerbal, the response time is impressive
this is now my favorite rocket, its so cute, especially the mini boosters
That's one fat sexy rocket. Good job China!
Impressive! Only 5 hours of preparation, and the launch cost can be reduced to 5000-7000 dollars per kilo.👍
I like how Gaming company MiHoYo also funded this.
yes,mihoyo have them1.83%
@@bilibili833 how much does the entire thing cost?
mihoyo also found a neurolink company that makes brain machine. Sword Art Online could be true in life.😊
Da Wei is building star rail in secret
lol
The best technology from China 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
It’s a simple rocket using only solid boosters. You can’t turn it off once it starts unlike liquid engines that you can throttle. In the world of rockets this is very primitive, it’s just a big bottle rocket like a firework.
Chubby rocket is cute rocket, we should build more cute rockets.
Chubby is much harder than thin for solid rocket
Thank you for the explanations!
interesting Rocket 🤔👍
KSP rockets do work.
An all-solid propellant medium to heavy lift launcher is metal as anything.
Congratulations 👏👏👏👏🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Gravity 1 is cuter and fatter than LM5
Space race 2.0 continues!
Space Recovery Missions.
Solid Boosters are underrated by general public.
This approach solves one of the biggest objections to using only solids for orbital launches, of controlling the terminal speed. Here, they can account for variable air density and other variables by delaying the center core ignition until the desired velocity will result. Neat.
@@jamesrosar3823 Controlling an SRBs terminal speed is something NASA has been able to do for decades. They can nullify an SRB's thrust midflight.
And on a sidenote, I think JAXA has some purely SRB-based rockets as well. I think there's one in the stack that has no internal guidance and entirely relies on a self-induced gravity turn to reach the desired orbit.
It's nice that a chinese commercial rocket company is offering rocket launches that (in contrast to the chinese rocket programm) don't shower towns in Machuria with rocket debris, but lets not get ahead of ourselves here.
You don't want those SRB's dropping anywhere near your neighborhood.
@@redpillcoach1855 The chinese government has shown mutliple times that they don't care about that at all. Spent tanks and boosters drop on villages all across china regularly. IIRC one caused a large fire in a small village, but the extent of the damage and loss of life was swept under the rug by chinese officials.
Private companies for the win!
万有引力号 前进四！
What is the state of that ship carrier after the rocket launch? The launch looked very explosive and there were too many debris on the video.
The ship has flame trenches to deal with the high thrust.
If the launch pad can somehow survive the blast, Elon Musk should contact OrienSpace. lol
使用船发射好几年了，没问题
@@duyataksis5210 People desperately try to dispute the fact that there is clearly visible *_DEBRIS_* going all over the place and it's slowly getting on my nerves.
Starbase had a flame diverter and it did it no good at Starship's maiden flight. Why not point out the obvious here in the same manner? The diverter was most likely not up to snuff and took damage. Big deal, change the design a little, improve it, get back to launching rockets. No need to sugarcoat the truth, when you can just embrace it.
@@h.a.9880idk man, Chinese user there says they've been doing this all the time and the ship's fine
Basically it's a Long March right?
Long March 11 is the only solid-propellant launch vehicle in the family and it looks like this www.youtube.com/@SciNewsRo/search?query=March-11
No. Long March rockets are made by chinese state owed space company(like NASA), but this one is made by a commercial space company. I don't want describe it as SPACEX, because there are at least 10 similar commercial companies in China.
❤️❤️❤️🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💪💪💪🤙🤙🤙
a men’s clothing brand
and a game company
Should be called ‘No-Gravity Rocket’
It seems that the launch load capacity and cost are not as good as SpaceX. The only advantage may be that the early preparation is quick (solid rockets usually require less maintenance and can be stocked up).
I think the 5000$/kg here is to SSO, vs. SpaceX's 2700$/kg to LEO. Also short prep time and less weather dependency save overall cost of ops
Well, solid rockets are also much easier to produce because their engines are so simple and reliable. Remember how the two Starships exploded?
Well, You have no idea how cheap these SRB can be when mass produced in China. The cz-11 production plant can reportedly put out 100 launch vehicles a year
I think that with the effect of scale, the costs are quickly brought down.
short and stubby, what are the specs - acceleration etc? zero important info here
curban spades progrant
Doooo
Это не возможно
Как такое грузоподъёмная твердотопливная ракета может взлететь с каробля или ....
it just did, and your RT channel also report that.
By the way, this ship is not the first time to launch a rocket on sea. This is it's third time already.
It looks like a male body part