Piers Morgan Takes On Russell Brand, His Allegations And Cancellation
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 09. 2023
- This week Piers Morgan gives his hottest and unfiltered takes on Russell Brand and the allegations he is currently facing. Piers also dives into the cancellation of the celebrity before being found guilty in a court of law.
Piers questions whether the cancellation of Russell is justified given he hasn't been convicted and also condemns the letter sent by Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the House of Commons media committee to Rumble to question if they will demonetise the celebrity's videos amidst these allegations.
Russell Brand released the following statement on his channel:
"Now, this isn't the usual type of video we make on this channel where we critique, attack and undermine the news in all its corruption because in this story, I am the news. I've received two extremely disturbing letters or a letter and an email. One from a mainstream media TV company, one from a newspaper listing a litany of extremely egregious and aggressive attacks, as well as some pretty stupid stuff like community festival should be stopped, that I shouldn't be able to attack mainstream media narratives on this channel. But amidst this litany of astonishing rather baroque attacks, often very serious allegations that I absolutely refute.
"These allegations pertain to the time when I was working in the mainstream, when I was in the newspapers all the time, when I was in the movies. And as I've written about extensively in my books, I was very, very promiscuous. Now, during that time of promiscuity, the relationships I had were absolutely always consensual. I was always transparent about that.
"Then almost too transparent, and I'm being transparent about it now as well. And to see that transparency metastasized into something criminal that I absolutely deny makes me question, is there another agenda at play? Particularly when we've seen coordinated media attacks before, like with Joe Rogan, when he dared to take a medicine that the mainstream media didn't approve of, and we saw a spate of headlines from media outlets across the world using the same language. "
"I'm aware that you guys have been saying in the comments for a while, watch out, Russell. They're coming from you. You're getting too close to the truth. Russell Brand did not kill himself. I know that a year ago there was a spate of articles.
"Russell Brand’s a conspiracy theorist, Russell Brand’s right wing. I'm aware of news media making phone calls, sending letters to people I know for ages and ages. It's being clear to me, or at least it feels to me like there's a serious and concerted agenda to control these kind of spaces and these kind of voices. And I mean, my voice along with your voice. I don't mind them using my books and my standout to talk about my promiscuous consensual conduct in the past.
"What I seriously refute are these very, very serious criminal allegations. Also, it's worth mentioning that there are witnesses whose evidence directly contradicts the narrative that these two mainstream media outlets are trying to construct, apparently, in what seems to me to be a coordinated attack.
"Now, I don't wanna get into this any further because of the serious nature of the allegations, but I feel like I'm being attacked and plainly they're working very closely together. We are obviously going to look into this matter 'cause it's very, very serious. In the meantime, I want you to stay close, stay awake, but more important than any of that, if you can, please stay free."
Click here for more from TalkTV talk.tv
If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
#piersmorgan #russellbrand #debate #interview #talktv - Zábava
Sharon "I automatically go to the woman's side"
Right there. That's the issue. It's instinctual but dangerous.
.... what's MORE dangerous is the people that support RB automatically & blindly !!!
They don't need to wait for any evidence or investigation !!!
They know & trust their Idol ...
yep, shame on Piers for displaying celebrity emotion and using the cancel tactic himself
Can you blame her tho? Do you know who her father is? Don Arden considered the "Al Capone of pop". The most notorious, crooked and dangerous music manager in the business. Even more so than Suge Knight. Of course she's going to side with the women, she's probably seen some things especially with what we know now about the industry. Even her own husband tried to murder her.
See my comment at top, there are grifters everywhere, and women that are plain vengeful. Then there are gold diggers.
I believe Prince Andrew may be innocent, it was never tried by the courts, think she knew she would get paid to keep it out the courts, being the RF gets dragged into it. my opinion only.
Fact she was 17 leaves me scratching my jaw. I know 17 years olds know exactly what they are doing, I was one, and in UK legal age is 16, and being teenage, rarely do they anything they don't want to do. Again its about her making money then too.
@@TOM-TOM-TOM WOW - your name would fit the content of your head, if you had been a dane...
Any value I may have attributed to Andrew Neil has completely dissipated.
And well said Esther. Sadly the government does think a person can be hung, drawn and quartered.
People started to listen to Russell more than a politician and he now gets silenced it’s clear what’s happening here
what is cclear
Well...Russell Brand is a paid Kremlin asset. Did you not watch his Russia Today interviews or him with Alex "KGB" Jones talking about overthrowing the UK & US governments?
do some research@@judeflynn9223
Seriously!!! Hang on where's my tin foil hat?! 🙄🤦🏼♀️
He was always very open about his bad behaviors but he did change his habits.
Are we now judging him.on behaviour from 15 years ago. What on earth is this, who are the Osbournes to judge anything?
Do you not like freedom of speech?
I'm pretty sure it was 15yrs 20yrs ago that the allegations were dated back too!!!🙄🤦🏼♀️
Ozzy doesn;t really look in a fit state to judge much....
Yes because he got away with it 15 years ago. It was socially acceptable back then, now women are saying those men should be held accountable.
@@G13RS I love freedom of speech
Andrew Neil, Robert Peston and the family who are drug addicts? 😂 Got no interest in any of their opinions. Embarrassing
well said, Piers is pathetic, most of his stuff is, it just keeps coming up in the feed and I need to find a way to cancel that
Does this mean that if someone turns his life around with addictions, can we not cut him some slack.
Two wrongs do not make a right. Stop media trials and the government calling for the ending of a citizens ability to earn a living.
I do always go straight to ‘what do the Osbournes?’ think when there are contentious issues. So glad this program cleared it up for us.
🤣
The Husband of Caroline Dinenage worked for the 77th brigade 2018-2020 ? who spied on us the UK People Russell would have been in their sights
Bore off.
Totally I agree.
@@firekind1980interesting .
Claims of untrue conquests while reprehensible isn't the same as rape.
really?
@@judeflynn9223 Yes of course
He has yet to be proved what he's being accused of.
I'm unsure exactly what he's being accused of...
A truly stunning observation, well done !
Its not about him RB, its about government over-reach writing letters to Platforms asking them to drop him from their Platforms, wake up !
Innocent or guilty he's got more intelligence never mind talent than the entire Osborn family put together. Look in your own clauset folks.
To be fair, when Ozzy was young, he probably achieved more culturally than Russell's ever done. But I take you point.
Ha!!! Brand is a waffling muppet with next to no intelligence. He's all gob and no wit. Mind, you're right about the Osborn tribe. Prats are all over the place. Pick an idiot, right?
As a working class Briton my respect for Ozzy has gone, he's lost the plot.
You had respect for Ozzy??
He ever had the plot?
He's a mumbler
Innocent until proven Guilty... ❤
If we brought back, no sex outside marriage; all these problems would go away.
Yes but that only applied to women so hypocritical
@@yvonnehayton6753 It should apply to both Sexes.
@@yvonnehayton6753
It applied to both sexes.
divorce lawyers gonna get even richer
Bruh people are literally going on shooting rampages because they can't get laid. You seriously think forcing celibacy on the entire population is going to create a better world? Back in the celibate times the world was massively more violent.
The Sun newspaper that Piers worked for gave Russell Brand an a award for the shagger of the year, FFS!!!
He built his act and reputation on it. When think of his career, i thought it was womaniser lol, but loved what he's done in recent years with his YT channel, love it.
Those in gov and big business owners, and others, would not like the things he says, that most of us think anyway.
Poor Ozzy Looks Knackerd.
What do they mean by "no talent"? The guy´s a genius.
I remember seeing him on some panels when Russel Brand was younger. I remember him actually positively contributing to those discussions so I can't agree with the opinion that he's talentless. In fact, many of his co-panelistws couldn't adequately retort to the points that he made at the time...
A key test of the right to free speech is whether the powers-that-be give that right to people they don't like, or disagree with.
It's a no-brainer to support freedom to say stuff you agree with.
I was never much of a fan of RB and he still claims to be an anarchist, but he raised questions that deserve answers, not cancellation.
It's all too obvious to sane people why the establishment has suddenly decided 20 years on that he's the pariah.
Obvious to me, I agree
How was dispatches thorough, when they were saying the text prove him that he raped her, when it was a text and a apology about not wearing a condom, plus the woman kept on seeing him, why the hell would someone who had been raped go back to the person who raped them!
Spot on 👏🏻
These women never take any responsibility for anything they do. Its always some external , evil force making them do it.
Correct
Sharon stayed with Ozzy after he literally tried to stab her to death and prosecutors even refused her request to drop the charges. So it happens.
It is only in a MeToo bizarre world that an accused can be judged guilty before proven innocent. All reasonably normal, fair-minded people should of course say no to that kind of lunacy.
Also why didn't anyone say anything about Russell at the height of the Me Too movement! It stinks! Imo
Rose McGowan has spoken that it should be innocent until proven guilty
I find it strange that the women came out at the same after so many years. Until he is tried in court his career should not be affected.
Because courts aren't the be all end all of something being true or not. There are tons of people in prisons who are innocent and tons of people not in prisons who are guilty. He's literally admitted to a lot of the claims in his own book. There's literally videos of him sexually assaulting people like that Austalian news reporter. So what if there's no court verdict? People have eyes.
@@Fireglo
Why did they all come out of the woodwork at the same time after so many years. Very suspicious.
Remember Cliffe Richards, all concerned so sure of his guilt Ched Evans footballer served time, career severely damaged by false allegations. We have a legal system with all its faults or not. We can't pick and choose.
Cliffe Richards
Is that Cliff Richard's brother?
Game of the Throne in "democracy". It is not about women, it is about right of speak.
Andrew Neil describing himself perfectly.
The BBC has refused to say whether it received historical complaints about Russell Brand as the broadcaster is expected to face scrutiny over allegations about the comedian’s alleged conduct.
The BBC and Channel 4 actively encouraged his outrageous behaviour as it helped ratings at the time
@@andieporter7104very true
Yes but this is an area where it is impossible to prove what happened. This is the core difficulty that people ignore when coming down on one or the other side of these arguments.
I mean there are literally videos online of him groping and sexually assaulting women like that Australian news reporter.
@@Fireglo 1. - is she acusing him of anything? 2. - 80-90% of all comunication is non verbal.. Who are you or anyone else to judge the comunication between him and the acusers, when things went on - IF they went on?
@@CONEHEADDK she doesn't have to. It's pretty clear he's doing it in the video.
@@Fireglo I haven't seen it. And I don't care, how you see the situation. It's all about how they saw the situation. Maybe looking into the statistics on how many % of women SELF REPORT to have said no, while thinking yes, and hoping the man would push on, would be interesting and educational for you.
Just trying to silence him because he speaks the truth
Unwatchable due to the childish emotion and the inability to debate calmly and rationally.
@danswhite8544 What a strange remark.
Narcissists never believe they've done anything wrong.
Who is the narcissist
Couldn't agree more!!!
You know who else never believes they've done anything wrong?
People who haven't done anything wrong.
@@andieporter7104 The blond in the middle.
@@andieporter7104Pierce Morgan
Andrew Neil dismisses Brand just because he personally finds him talentless.
That Ava is awful. Esther talks total sense.
Totally. I don't know wht Piers keeps inviting her on
There was nearly a pillow fight there for a second...
Esther is brilliant and should be invited more. As for Ava........
that the blond?
Thank you Esther. Women need to be more vocal about the decent way to report SA, men are hamstrung.
Very persistence and sensitive on this issue today, Piers. Impressive.
Jeese why automatically go to the woman's side I'm a female have known some nasty women and bloody nice blokes
Bottom line he is innocent until proven guilty! If we don’t protect this principle then each one of us can be eliminated by any allegation from friend or foe!!!
He got the pass because he was a far left celebrity...
Well people who judge other people without evidence should experience this for themselves before they can change their opinions.
I can absolutely guarantee non of your guests here have ever watched his channel = stupid BIGOTS - I hated RB back in the day I like most thought he was a W anker At best - but after watching his input last few years found it quite compelling - mr Neil would be slam dunked in a debate against him but that would only happen if the Neil bigotry and self importance was removed. Self righteousness is rife here - glad to know who’s gonna eat their words later ( or cowardly keep silent probably? ) DUE PROCESS - NOT HAPPENING.
Couldn't agree more, I hated the BBS/Channel four stooge that they created. Have since watched his transformation and although I don't agree with everything he says, I dont find him offensive
neither has Piers nor any of the media, they only pick out one or two dodgy guests he interviewed and boom they throw out the baby with the bathwater - Piers tries to hide his ignorance by trying to get rid of an important point as to what actually was Russell doing that may upset the powers that be including the Times and ch4...also green eyed monster, PM will never get as many subscribers as RB, we can see his shallowness and lack of integrity, uncensored my ass
Same, love where he's taken his purpose, better than womanising for a career haha but in a very tongue in cheek way. I hope its proved he's innocent for him, his family and to stick it up the establishment trying to silence him. We all agree with him, because we already think it. Well I do anyway. Haven't voted because I believe we have given govs too much power, and thats why they are corrupt, and why they do what the hell they like, left or right, or middle. Whats the point. How govs are run needs changing, putting more policies to a referandum.
The Right wouldn't defend him if Brand was on the left. The left would defend if Brand was still liberal. This has become a right said, left said
"Im a model, you know what I mean
And I do my little turn on the catwalk"
Wrong Fred?
Brand is still on the left. Just because he talks openly about some issues the corporate elite faction of the left calls “misinformation” he’s labelled right wing but if you listen to what he espouses from his own beliefs and convictions he’s a social democrat. I’m pretty sure he debated from a pro socialist standpoint with Candace Owens who is a conservative and they clashed.
You are missing the point. We don't care if he is guilty in a court of law & is sentenced. My problem is the free speech situation.
Love Esther K. Go girl.
Great coverage, Piers. You have done a good job steering the craft through the treacherous waters between Scylla and Charybdis.
Andrew Neil saying everyone hung on to is every word, but now there trying to hang him on the word he spoke! Ffs!
Andrew Neil is a prat!!
Everyone already knew he was a womanizer
Social media creators should be brought into the same regulations as TV and News Papers.
Journalist go thru some formal education to get journalistic credentials.
Investigative journalists have a proven track record of well researched facts, presented neutrally for the public to make judgement on....
Any person can be a youtuber....
CZcams and platforms do have standards/rules to follow
From what i can see, brand hasnt breached any of these....
Imho
@@irenedemarco1354 blah
Are there any allegations abroad? Or just the UK.
Sharon looks like she's wearing a mask lol
Regardless of his lurid and perhaps criminal behavior, Brand has more talent in his little finger than half the people who appear on television, including Andrew Neil.
Neil said something similar about Jimmy Savile having zero talent and becoming a household name, I think what Neil is really saying is - don't let the riff raff on the telly,
But here's the thing, Prince Andrew has no talent, neither does Ghislaine Maxwell, neither does Donald Trump - but would Neil apply the same yardstick to them?
And talent and charisma are different things, it's possible to have no real talent but to have tons of charisma. Savile and Brand both had charisma.
And why is talent some watchword against abuse? And what does he mean about redeeming qualities? Is he saying, that if you have redeeming qualities and talent then abuse is okay?
I mean Gary Glitter and Rolf Harris were talented - Ched Evans has redeeming qualities, he can play football - but so what???
What Neil really means is, if you're posh that means you have redeeming qualities. Like many posh people calling for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell or claiming Prince Andrew has been punished enough.
What it is in the UK, whenever there's a threat to the ruling establishment, working class celebrities are always exposed to placate the mob, while the upper classes get off.
It's like the line in From Hell, when the head of Scotland Yard hears that Jack the Ripper might be a surgeon - at which he replies 'better he were a butcher'.
Gary Glitter didn't last long after he was released earlier this year, he was up to his old tricks in a matter of weeks and banged to rights. From all accounts the material they found on his device was exceptionally worse than before. So much for his talent!!!
@@julezpanda14 There's no denying he had talent though. that he sold millions of records. But that's immaterial, he's a horrible pervert. I'm just trying to work out what Andrew Neil is talking about - that Brand and Savile had 'no talent or 'redeeming' qualities' yet became household names.
Like if you have talent and redeeming qualities then it's alright to be a pedophile??
And besides, Brand and Savile both had talent and you could argue both had redeeming qualities - as in they did a lot for charity.
So I don't really understand where Neil is coming from. I suppose being some old Tory and friend of Rupert Murdoch he's ran in to a lot of perverts who he thinks have redeeming qualities and bags of talent.
But this is how this country works, the working class perverts will be exposed while upper class ones will remain accusation free, I mean Maxwell and Prince Andrew would never have been exposed in this country if not for them coming under investigation in the US.
Good friend of ours ..."whats her name?"
Well.. Brand can sue if he dares..
Was Andrew Neil talking about himself
Why didn't Peston call it out if there was rumours?
Russell is very different to Saville
Responsibility and accountability is a womans kryptonite.
What is wrong with the woman on the right?????
Sharon "I automatically go to the woman's side"
Okay so you're not an objective thinker. Got it.
What has the Foreign Secretary, Downing Street and now the Department for Culture Media and Sport got to do with the Russell Brand allegations? It appears that the government and mainstream media are targetting Brand regardless of his guilt or innocent until proven guilty. Doesn’t their statements and the investigation and potential subsequent trial, surely not prejudice all these allegations coming from the government? This all sounds like a personal and political hit job by the establishment. Btw I have never liked Brand or his politics and views, but now he is critical of lockdowns, Ukraine and big pharma, he is being pursued by the far left media such as the BBC, Channel Four, LBC and the Guardian.
A gentleman never tells.
Women are perfect. I found this when my mom left my Dad with nothing at 50. She minted now and he’s on his arse.
So why is Google demonetising Russell Brand and not United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres???
I accuse Brand of the worst crime of all: being a HACK COMEDIAN. Evidence of that is available on his DVDs.
Russel Brands controversy sounds little different than the litany of scandals over 50 years tied to the man on the end of the couch. No angel either...
The difference in women. You just got to pray you marry the right one!
How cowardly and irresponsible of these accusers for not going to the police when they claim to have been raped, leaving them free to carry on doing it. Ha.
Really?! And do you have any idea how they're treated when they go to the police, especially back then, even though it's not that much better now?! On top of that, the fact that he's a celebrity, it's bad enough just trying to bring an every day man to court!!! 🙄🤦🏼♀️
Is Sharon and Kelly on Ozempic? Too skinny, yikes! and Ozzy is falling asleep as he pets the dog... hilarious!
Piers morgan, a bastion of truth and honesty, i wonder how you sleep at night ?
Innocent till proven guilty. Move to silence him for all his expose'.
Piers Morgan should work for the tabloid called the National Enquirer. His whole career is going in the direction of Hollywood drool and the latest gossip.
When you know someone in Scientology and they go to prison for life, what happens??
"Your opinion sucks on this." So frikken what, bring on the facts snd the court case.
Names, due process.
Well said neil Andrews
What s wrong with Sharon?
Brands lucky he never got laid out , saying that sort of thing about people's daughters 😮
The women in the industry ( Comedy circuit and TV/Radio ) don't want Russell Brand arrested. Or even for him to be unfairly cancelled. Just for it to be front and centre in the general publics combined mindset...that he is a relentless and remorseless predator. A beguiling, charismatic, dark-triad narcissist. It was treated as a joke before... now it might be taken seriously. That's a huge change in awareness. Which is welcomed by women who are supposed to be his equals in the entertainment industry, that they both inhabit.
*That politicians and media executives are jumping on the 'righteous' bandwagon... has nothing to do with women's real fears around Russell Brand.
Legal process only
I hope Russell sues Morgan as well as the MSM
Well said Andrew Neil. He is absolutely CORRECT. Too much attention and power is given to worthless scumbags. TIME FOR POSITIVE CHANGE!!!
Who Russell Brand was decades ago is not who he is today. Any respect that Russell Brand has acquired he has done solely through genuinely speaking the truth about things that affect us all. Nobody respects the man he used to be, not even he does. And he would agree with the principle of your comment too.
Can you prove any of this? And the answer is... NO@@natjackson4880
Sorry Piers but if you think the Dispatches programme was ‘good journalism’ you need to seriously need to go to specsavers. A 4 yr investigation culminated in that!! 🙈
where do the osborne's come into this? Experts in nothing!!
How many % of assault of men leeds to convictions? Most guys I know, would have to have been really badly hurt, and with no prior history with the other guy, to go to the cops.
@danswhite8544 I don't knowcwhat a DV is, or understand, what your point is.
wow - the cmnts vanish faster than (insert joke here=
@danswhite8544 True. "Fun" fact -lesbian relationships are (as I recall) the most violent.. And women hit men kore than the oposite - that one I'm sure of.. Some places in the world, if a guy can't get married, he can R a girl, and then she will have to marry him, bcz noone else will have her. And I'm also pretty sure, that boys are victims of R more than girls.. Look my claims up though - I might be a liar or just wrong.
Why now tho?
Jack Osborne looks great, the other three are looking dreadful
The tubby little chap has grown up good. The others have all had a bit too much botox etc. Ozzy probably thought it was Heroin and consented
I reveal some truth about Russell Brand..
What on earth did i just watch?
Piers is right
Sharon has some allegations about herself that aren't so good......
Andrew Sach's granddaughter! Clearly still has issues, doesnt know which way is up. I'd rather have no support than hers, back to rehab, Russell get a refund!!
He's guilty of being a lowlife. As for crimes, that's up to the court.
Is that the Addams family ?
But women aren't always respected when they complain
Wow all of the sudden. Right when he says stuff you dont like....now its an issue....hmmmm
if you don't go to the police you just create more victims
Pearl on Pierce Morgan 🤨
Russel got the the ugly truth out...got em by the balll...thts why 'the hand' try to shut him down . ...
But if you were to connect Jimmy Saville to a certain royal ud be a conspiracy theorists
So if this is untrue then Russel could sure them for slander.but the bbc did know about one of his s harrassment towards a lady working in the radio station and she told bbc about it and all they said was yes we know he is talking about it on live radio so he basically said he pulled his thing out and was saying rude words to the lady that shouldn’t be allowed and will not help him at all.i am not a fan of the man he is just very word to me always has been but if this is untrue what will happen to the ones accusing him of this.and why would they come out and say these things also
What were the Osborne's doing there, character assassination by Piers...nothing factual, no evidence, ...Piers is a gob, just talk talk talk and this played into his own agendas
She says she automatically sides with the women, no Sharon, people should let the law thoroughly investigate and side with the truth.
A court of law verdict is very often not the truth. There are tons of innocent people in prison and tons of guilty people walking the streets.
It’s a PITY piers you didn’t fight for peoples right to FULLY INFORM CONSENT on experimental medication.