Jon Stewart & David E. Sanger On New Cold Wars | HasanAbi reacts
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 06. 2024
- Original video: • David E. Sanger - “New...
I'm NOT HasanAbi. This is a FAN-MADE channel.
Edited By: HasanAbi Reacts To
Follow Hasan's Socials:
Main Channel ► / hasanabi
Watch live EVERYDAY ► / hasanabi
/ hasanthehun
/ hasandpiker
If you own the copyright of the content shown in this video and would like it to be removed please contact me at: HasanAbiCapital@gmail.com
#hasanabi reacts #hasanabi #hasanpiker - Zábava
being mad at china for saying “we’re gonna build up our nuclear weapons to match the size of amarica’s and russia’s” requires you to directly point out that america has also done this but somehow it’s okay when we do it????
bc we're Christians damnit.
Cuz ppl don’t get that now nuclear plants are “better/safer” than coal so when they here there’s gonna be more of them they freak out
China bad okay 😊
China is dictatorship. I take it that is not important to you.
People like you have to realize this is literally just countries shit talking each other......... Sure these shit talks can have huge consequences, but people have to stop treating them like they ought to be moral or principled and shouldn't have double-standards........ Don't even bother arguing against their rationale, cos whether you like it or not, under the context of the current world order, to shit talk is rational, just not ideal.........
The faster you accept this, the less time you waste on trying to find every meaningless hypocrisy in everything.......
Damn Prigozhin was really too dangerous to be left al*ve. That man was on his sigma grindset
From a lvl 1 Chef to a lvl 99 PMC head, what a boss
You really could reduce the amount of ads to the second highest setting you know
I wonder if John Stewart knows about hasan and if he’d come on the broadcast . That’d be f^ckin AWESOME IMO🤩😤👌🏾
More likely Hasan would be a guest on Stewart's show
@@porsche911sbs True. Either or. 🤷🏽
I think he’s aware of who Hasan is. Hasan has had big names on and made national news with his controversy
@@Dontdoit_Plural.
Controversies. 😂
My roommate this year in college was an international student from Beijing and had no idea what Uyghur Muslims were
Makes sense
Westerners projection of their own heinous actions towards the ppl they know nothing about is truly pathetic beyond words.
Your dying settler colonial society and your fake moral superiority couldn’t collapse soon enough.
So they had never looked at a Chinese banknote and wondered what the Arabic script was?
Probably doesnt understand the world uyghur cuz the chinese pronunciation is way different. try asking them " wei wu er zu". that's the chinese word for the uyghur ethnic group.
Ask an average white American to name 5 native American tribes.
Jon is fine in this interview
"Someday china will be able to produce their own semiconductors and that's a threat"... a threat to who? Not to me, cheaper tech is good.
It's not even a threat to the US leadership or military. It's a threat to our ability to remain economically superior.
The US dollar is the standard global currency. Of course, China and Russia have aligned themselves to American capitalism and imperialism. All superpowers do the same thing. Who would have thought fascist hegemony is globally apealling to the oligarchs despite nationality and their respective presumed inherent political stances.It's the oldest story in human history: greedy men are greedy.
Hasan would fucking love IQ2 debates!
ffs, you can literally fly to Xinjiang, go there and use your own eyes to fact check.
I like how John Stewart says are we lying to them. I don't know if I'm giving him too much credit, but I hope he notices the truth.
I think John Stewart is one of those people with good founding principles and good moral character, but he's not immune to the mainstream narratives any more than any of us, and he has the added difficulty of the limited knowledge paradox one of my professors in university explained, where no matter how smart you get, even if you're an expert in your field, in the end, the generation that follows you will know more than you have ever known and yet still know the same because they had more access to knowledge and we're constantly improving the mechanisms through which we cram that knowledge into people's heads, but human knowledge on the whole is constantly expanding, so their slice of the knowledge pie won't be much different than yours. And Jon isn't a total expert, he's a general politics guy. So when we're his age, a younger person in a certain field will be waving their fist at the screen going "c'mon, what!" at somebody like us
Bush and Putin on a yacht footage is on CZcams. Kinda weird.
Here's the thing though....... he talks about how his analysis always treats nations as rational actors...... but he doesn't realize that the elements of imperialism, expansionism and hegemony is the rational course of action for countries that are just stronger than other countries........
This is why his whole NATO-bad, America-bad argument is meaningless when analyzing geopolitical rivalry, because the rational end state to this whole rivalry will be that both sides will have force projection at each other's backyard, instead of both sides pulling out.......
And this is just talking about rivalry between two great powers, when you take the US out of the equation the whole scenario still stands...... China is significantly stronger than almost every other country in this world, do people seriously think, for a country that relies so heavily on global trade, that if the US didn't exist, they wouldn't be sending their navy and armed forces overseas to protect their trading routes and to respond to emergency situations when they can? Do people seriously think that the only reason that China has a base in Djibouti is solely because the US and US alone might threaten them? No. It's the rational course of action to protect their interests when those interests are offshore...... So then what happens when China sails into the backyard of India or the Philippines? Does India get to cry about “Chinese imperialism”????? They probably do, but you should also understand how meaningless it is.........
I am not saying that any of this combative geopolitical rivalry to become the one hegemony is "ideal", I am saying that singling out the West as the only "evil" party practicing what would be and is practiced by every other powerful nation is itself unfaithful to the ideology of eliminating such hegemonies........
And tragically, the same thing goes for nuclear proliferation....... You are right to believe that a more peaceful world order should be the end goal, but bitching about how it doesn't exist yet because one side is "more evil" than the other is denying the root cause of the problem......
lmao this is the same argument as israel’s “defensive genocide” - pure projection. and are you seriously comparing China building infrastructure in Africa to the centuries of resource extraction by the U.S./Euros from the era of slavery ongoing to this day? just another flaccid case of whataboutism but your false equivalence falls flat
There is a difference between sending warships to protect trade routes and invading other countries and trying to do regime change by dragging out a civil war. The US has a choice of establishing good relations with Russia and avoiding cold war 2 with Russia and China. Also, what is the purpose of antagonising North Korea and keeping the embargo against Cuba?
There is also the military industrial complex and politicians being bought out by them.
better the devil you know than the devil you don't
Hasaan's arguments defending China could be used to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine
Putin literally stood in the German parliament and asked to join nato and the eu. But we needed an enemy so bad
The Soviet Union asked to join NATO back when it was founded too
@@porsche911sbs Well, they were created as a anti-soviet alliance. To defend wealthy capitalist interests and corporate world dominance.
Putin asked to join, so long as Russia didn't have to "wait in line with countries that don't matter."
One can accept that much of the rank-and-file members of NATO do imperialism and other bad things as well as Putin being a fascist, revanchist piece of shit at the same time.
@@porsche911sbsNATO itself created all the tension in itself. Win a war with someone and then set up an exclusive screw you group.
I love all the headlines about "Why China building up its military in the south China sea is bad." It's literally called the south CHINA sea, yet there's never anything about the US building up its military right on chinese borders.
“Jon Stewart ends it with a couple of jokes to neutralize the whole thing…”
What? On a comedy show? What in the world is Jon Stewart thinking?
Also, Hasan completely missed the point when the guest talked about power vacuums. The justification is the exact same as any argument against unilateral disarmament: “if we choose to disarm, we’ll be at the whim of those who don’t.” Only in this case it’s “if there is going to be a king, wouldn’t you rather it be us? We at least talk a good game about being fair and just, we only occasionally (YMMV) do tyrannical shit. But those other guys, you know they are tyrants, we can’t let them be king!” It’s a self-serving rationalization, but it is rational. Hasan acts like the dude contradicted himself one line to the next.
man look at times bosnia chechnia was a way diffrent world we did not like to beat time close to russia ya its 2024 and biden is more like iran contra but bosnia at time we were kinnda trying to belive the cold war was over oooh wait another one were you wereny alive yet and i was 19 or 21
Hasan "at least the high-speed rail is on time" Piker, I wonder who else uses that excuse lol
Saying that China did "residential schools but on steroids" is probably the wildest thing Hasan has ever said. Bro watches too much Johnny Harris lol
They just did regular residential schools
americans, even the intelligence wing, cannot grasp that putin values things other than the line going up. americans be like "obviously they love only money like us" when many people around the world value other things, like land, hegemony, religion, etc and will take financial hits to achieve those goals.
Did you know double clicking a comment gives it a like?
I disliked this comment ❤️
@@chriswp50 ikr lmao that’s so valid I just wanted to see how well this would work
265 million people visited xinjiang in 2023, no pics of camps or oppression
Because the reeducation was done in buildings and students went home everyday. Seemed mostly like job training. It had a timetable, targeted terrorists, and ended 2 years ago.
Maybe it was a translation thing.
They were literally just vocational colleges, and the people saying China was oppressing Muslims are all the people now supporting Israel.
No, there very much was mass imprisonment directed at people in that region for their religious identity. Even Bad Empanada did a video on it & he’s no brainless China hater.
You’re not vindicated on Russia not invading Ukraine. The amount of men, truck and armor amassing on the border was a clear sign of an invasion.
i think most of the world, despite knowing Russia’s ambitions, were surprised by the direction they took, and that they would go that far. it’s been 3 years, get a new talking point
@@whodis5438 I’m not saying most people got it right but there were some who absolutely called it. He brought it up
Get over it
@@Heartless365 I’m not upset about it.
Sanger is a damn liar.