I have been saying this for years that men are socialized to not like women. We live in a modern day Greco Roman society. We know what kind of relationships were rampant in those societies and how women were perceived. No need to get into details about it. Men are raised to see men in high regard, to equally value men, to be intellectually stimulated by men, and to have their most mentally and emotionally fulfilling relationships with men. They are taught that women are less than logically, intellectually, and emotionally immature. To not equally value women. To view them as people to get things out of. That's that Eurocentric/Central Asiatic mindset. It's a lot if mental reorganizing that a man has to do in ordee to break free from that conditioning. Men consciously have to learn to like women as human beings and love feminine energy.
Yep. If you examine the rise of patriarchy and the progression of societies throughout human history, it becomes obvious that we are currently living in a globalized society steeped in Greco-Roman philosophy transmogrified via monotheism. The idea that men are superior or somehow more human than women is just that - an idea - with little to no basis in reality. Biologically, there is tons of evidence that female is the default version of all mammalian life forms. We've been fed an intricate web of lies to create a self-reinforcing psychological prison that only benefits those in power.
Public i love seeing those moments with u and ur son. He even does some of ur facial expressions and its beautiful how kind and patient you are with him. 😊
2:09:00 Hold on. Public is up here telling women that we are delusional when we say we would like multiple boyfriends.. if only dudes could be mature enough. No, we're not delusional. Public says dudes are boring and that's why we don't want several. No like, dudes are boring, so you need several to fill in anything interesting enough to make one whole dude. It goes both ways on this one. Men want excitement and variety, so do women. So why the hell does patriarchy exist making us play monogamy? Some people would want to be monogamous anyway, but not the majority. In the context the patriarchy, yes monogamy is the safest route in general. For women. It's not dangerous for men to be poly like it is for us. And therein lies the difference. But to say that women don't want to be with multiple men doesn't really make sense. We got to be careful not to fall into that stupid hogamous higamous poem bs. All of this male nonsense stems from the simple fact that men want to know exactly what children "belong to them". Ostensibly because they want to protect the success of their own dna. But even that is a lie, as a man's sister's children has more in common with him genetically than any children he has fathered. Generally, what women want is to have the freedom to be with different men. Many of us also want to have children. These things are perfectly compatible until some dude gets all emotional and violent about the fact that he can't tell exactly where his sperm went. When his sperm is irrelevant. Because again, it's his sister's children who carry more of his genetics. So he can go hang out with her and raise those children with her. That is completely normal and natural and healthy. That's what we do organically without a system such as patriarchy in place.
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 why would you want to be bothered with _multiple_ dudes? I have enough trouble making myself want to be bothered with just one.
@@KiraBKADestroyerOfWorlds it's like i said above: it's in the context of patriarchy where dudes suck so much. where one might wonder whether she could have several dudes from whom she takes the best and leaves the rest. but ofc, dudes are too dangerous and vindictive and manipulative for that. we do feel the pull of "what if several dudes" also because something inside us knows the organic way of things. outside the rulershytt.. outside of patriarchy, where most men are actual people, most women would indeed have multiple male friends, many of whom a gal would have physically intimate times with. woman AND men would pay close attention to women's calendars to be careful about reproduction. no one really pair-bonds with anyone unless they really want to, and there is zero social penalty for not doing so. and it would all be gravy. no one trippin. everyone friends, generally.
I mean… two men that are also bi wouldn’t be off the table. But then it’s two guys imma most likely have to take care of. They’d have to be well adjusted adults.
*They want all the benefits of marriage* without being married or having to be responsible like a husband should.
This.
So you’re telling me men will want everything and yet give nothing in return?
Men are the pinnacle of can’t have your cake and eat it too.
they want a harem with kids they don't have to take care of.
Gross
That is exactly what Nick Cannon has. A harem and kids he doesn’t interact with regularly.
Nor do they want to take care of the harem.
I have been saying this for years that men are socialized to not like women. We live in a modern day Greco Roman society. We know what kind of relationships were rampant in those societies and how women were perceived. No need to get into details about it. Men are raised to see men in high regard, to equally value men, to be intellectually stimulated by men, and to have their most mentally and emotionally fulfilling relationships with men. They are taught that women are less than logically, intellectually, and emotionally immature. To not equally value women. To view them as people to get things out of. That's that Eurocentric/Central Asiatic mindset. It's a lot if mental reorganizing that a man has to do in ordee to break free from that conditioning. Men consciously have to learn to like women as human beings and love feminine energy.
Yet men of those cultures never had multiple wives or harems. Unfortunately, women are second class almost everywhere.
Yep. If you examine the rise of patriarchy and the progression of societies throughout human history, it becomes obvious that we are currently living in a globalized society steeped in Greco-Roman philosophy transmogrified via monotheism. The idea that men are superior or somehow more human than women is just that - an idea - with little to no basis in reality. Biologically, there is tons of evidence that female is the default version of all mammalian life forms. We've been fed an intricate web of lies to create a self-reinforcing psychological prison that only benefits those in power.
Yea men have always been gay
Damnnnnnnn no wonder I stopped dating!
Checked out 7 yrs ago
Ponigamy toke me TF out🤣
1:01:47 lmao this is literally their argument for women ‘fixing’ them😂
Quiet as kept, there's a third option these "modern" dudes are preferring that's not up there. 😏
This needs to be a prompt..
The most popular one of all, at that.
Word. Just switch out the two women in the "that" with other.
Public i love seeing those moments with u and ur son. He even does some of ur facial expressions and its beautiful how kind and patient you are with him. 😊
It’s not boredom it’s definitely tired of being mistreated.
That’s Chief Keef in that picture? Where the hell they dragged him up from?! 🧐
2:09:27 XY’s do whatever tf I tell them to do just to get close enough to smell me. Y’all better recognize your power.
Love this!💕
Tripling down on gaslighting is what most men do.🤷🏽♀🤷🏽♀🤷🏽♀
2:09:00
Hold on. Public is up here telling women that we are delusional when we say we would like multiple boyfriends.. if only dudes could be mature enough. No, we're not delusional.
Public says dudes are boring and that's why we don't want several. No like, dudes are boring, so you need several to fill in anything interesting enough to make one whole dude.
It goes both ways on this one. Men want excitement and variety, so do women. So why the hell does patriarchy exist making us play monogamy? Some people would want to be monogamous anyway, but not the majority.
In the context the patriarchy, yes monogamy is the safest route in general. For women. It's not dangerous for men to be poly like it is for us. And therein lies the difference.
But to say that women don't want to be with multiple men doesn't really make sense.
We got to be careful not to fall into that stupid hogamous higamous poem bs.
All of this male nonsense stems from the simple fact that men want to know exactly what children "belong to them". Ostensibly because they want to protect the success of their own dna. But even that is a lie, as a man's sister's children has more in common with him genetically than any children he has fathered.
Generally, what women want is to have the freedom to be with different men. Many of us also want to have children. These things are perfectly compatible until some dude gets all emotional and violent about the fact that he can't tell exactly where his sperm went. When his sperm is irrelevant. Because again, it's his sister's children who carry more of his genetics. So he can go hang out with her and raise those children with her. That is completely normal and natural and healthy. That's what we do organically without a system such as patriarchy in place.
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 why would you want to be bothered with _multiple_ dudes? I have enough trouble making myself want to be bothered with just one.
@@KiraBKADestroyerOfWorlds it's like i said above: it's in the context of patriarchy where dudes suck so much. where one might wonder whether she could have several dudes from whom she takes the best and leaves the rest. but ofc, dudes are too dangerous and vindictive and manipulative for that. we do feel the pull of "what if several dudes" also because something inside us knows the organic way of things. outside the rulershytt..
outside of patriarchy, where most men are actual people, most women would indeed have multiple male friends, many of whom a gal would have physically intimate times with. woman AND men would pay close attention to women's calendars to be careful about reproduction. no one really pair-bonds with anyone unless they really want to, and there is zero social penalty for not doing so.
and it would all be gravy. no one trippin. everyone friends, generally.
I mean… two men that are also bi wouldn’t be off the table.
But then it’s two guys imma most likely have to take care of. They’d have to be well adjusted adults.
“ You on the other hand “……… 😂😂😂😂
2:29:14 that’s on Period Kay! Jeff is the homie!!!
Sir!!!! You are NOT 42!!!!!
What is ponigamy? Serious question.