Marco Buonamassa - facts. And if he still did the circle glide like in Yokohama and Tokyo with that amazing moonwalk in ‘88, it would reign even more superior
Wembley he's more aggressive and calculated with his movements, he's feeling the groove differently that day. In Bucharest he's more loose, free-flowing and just enjoying himself, he's feeling the groove differently that day. Both great performances.
Dancing: Bucharest '92 (smoothest moves and moonwalk of all time + crazy energy) Singing: Wembley' 88 (his best live Billie Jean vocals ever, PERFECT executed)
While he was still at the top of his game dancing wise in 88 and many years prior, he didn’t reach his full “powers” and have that extra special touch until around the Dangerous era. 1992 wins for me.
This is 100 percent true he’s more free flowing and aggressive in wembly but in Bucharest he’s more calculated and perfect because he’s more experience and has finally reached his peak
The winner is doubtlessly Dangerous Tour 1992. Way better in everything, especially in dancing. You can clearly see that he's way smoother and energetic during the Dangerous Tour.
Steve Lecci u sure? Bad’s moonwalk is faster and the hee hoo dance also is faster and how do u come up with burcharest beig faster, bad even needed to go on slowmo for 4 sec’s for burcharst.
The dancing is slightly better at Bucharest but he still moved REALLY smooth in Wembley also he was experiencing at this time how to move and learn new moves even after 5 years from his first Billie jean but idk why the vocals got rough right after the dangerous tour
he’s more free flowing and aggressive in wembly but in Bucharest he’s more calculated and perfect because he’s more experience and has finally reached his peak
Should probably do another version with the bad world tour audio for a fair contest.. I personally believe Dangerous performance was better in dancing, energy and crowd reaction but the bad tour version is better in terms of vocals, also sounding like the studio version, the bad era swag and attitude was better to watch but dangerous was MJ in his prime in almost every category.. just noticeably over the years it became harder for him to dance and sing at the same time whilst maintaining vocals that sounded like the studio version. .. which is why HIStory was mainly playback and a lot slower.
At the bad tour michael is more energetic, he has a lot of moves, in 92 michael is more robotic, both moonwalk is so satisfying for me! But 1992 Mj wins for me
In my opinion he looked best in the bad era. Should have stopped plastic surgery there or in the 90's because it really affected what he looked like in the 2000's
@@commanderglitch1013 Michael did a lot of plastic surgeries in his nose to reconstruct, because it collapsed, and he didn't have a lot of new plastic surgeries in the 90s, he just changed his hair (wigs), his skin got clearer and he used to use a lot of makeup, he just did a lot of plastic surgeries in the 2000s to continue young and he modified his lips, but fortunately, he reconstructed his nose in 2003/2005 and it made his appearance better, but he was so better in bad era, he just had surgeries at his nose and his chin at this age.
David Dankey i heard both versions..of course in 1988 he was 4 years younger but i didnt found great difference in voice..u could say that in 1992 he had more help from his co-singers..but the overall show at 1992 live is much much greater than the 1988 one..smoother , with more dancing moves ,accurate timing of everything!
Es raro ver a Michael Jackson que todavía seguía siendo un hombre de color, cuando en la entrevista con Opra Winfrey, Jackson menciona que el problema del vitíligo comenzó un poco después de la época de "thriller"' y eso fue entre 1984 y 1985 durante el proyecto de "We are the world". Esto en cambio, es 1988, ya había pasado el álbum "Bad", que se realizó un año atrás, y ahí, Michael ya era de tez blanca. Yo más bien podría suponer que Michael fue totalmente blanco, apartir del cuarto álbum como solista, que es ese discazo "Dangerous". Si alguien sabe el dato lo agradeceré, pero yo supongo que ha deber sido como lo he redactado.
fernandototototote Te lo voy a resumir: en la era bad como las manchas cubrían menos del 50% de su cuerpo, ocultaba con maquillaje las manchas blancas. En cambio en la era dangerous donde las manchas superaban el 50% decidió ponerse maquillaje blanco en todo el cuerpo
En la era Bad y hasta antes de la era Dangerous no utilizaba un sólo tipo de color de maquillaje. Por ejemplo en los AMA's de 1989 se lo ve super palido pero en los Oscars de 1991 con Madonna se lo vuelve a ver un poco mas moreno. En la era Dangerous ya opto por el blanco definitivo. Ten en cuenta que la iluminación influye muchisimo.
Concuerdo con las 2 respuestas anteriores... Michael menciona que pudo haber sido durante Off the wall o Thriller cuando empezó el vitiligo... En la portada de Bad, es la edición de la imagen la razón por la que parece blanco. Sin embargo hay muchas fotos de 1986, 1987 y 1988 donde se lo ve bastante moreno. Utilizaba maquillaje, incluso durante Thriller y se notaba mucho en su cara... La iluminación y los flashes influían mucho en como se veía. Y como en la epoca de Bad la enfermedad aún no estaba tan avanzada, todavía utilizaba maquillaje oscuro para cubrir las zonas despigmentadas, sobre todo la cara. Lo que noto tambien es que en algun momento de 1988 comenzó a maquillarse las manos y parte de los dedos, ya que durante ese mismo año y el anterior todavía tenía las manos como en Thriller... Aunque tambien es cierto que tenía la tez un poco mas clara que en Thriller. Obviamente en Dangerous ya era totalmente blanco, tanto por el maquillaje que empezó a utilizar, como por el mayor avance del vitiligo... Saludos!
Mmmmmmm q pasada de vídeo me gusta muchísimo volverlo a ver y oírlo me encanta mucho cada vez que lo veo es como si lo tuviera delante bailando y cantando siempre te llevaré en lo más profundo de mi corazón ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I would say Bucharest 1992 would win. What's your choice? Bucharest 1992 -> czcams.com/video/DeVqllxhoe8/video.html ? OR Wembley (London) 1988 -> czcams.com/video/BMZogxtiTis/video.html ? Make your choice!
The only thing that I don’t like about dangerous tour is that the camera is moving like Michael Jackson so I prefer a bad tour but dangerous is the best
Something this did confirmed for me is that he does freestyle in BJ‼️ I have MJ HAT signed all my love MJ, ppl says it’s worth $800 I don’t believe that ‼️
Yo creo que gana wembley porque en la gira bad la cantaba completamente en vivo y billie jean es una de sus ultimas canciones hací que se imaginaran cantar y bailar en un concierto* al estilo Michael* Y hacerlo como lo hace en el concierto, de verdad en esa gira si que se desenvolvió de verdad aunque hay que recalcar en la gira Dangerous es muy buena pero ahí ya empezó a utilizar en PlayBack debido a los problemas con su voz y ya no tenia la misma edad que cuando empezó el bad tour que fue a los 29.
En realidad a partir de 1996 con history tour es donde se ve que el paso del tiempo ya le pasa factura y más con sus problemas de voz , hizo que history tour no tuviera el mismo impacto que bad y dangerous tour a nivel de artista, se puede concluir que como artista su maxima plenitud fue desde 1982 hasta 1995 en la MTV awards que podemos ver a Michael todavía ágil y con vitalidad pese a las denuncias de 1993. Y respecto al 30th anniversary esperaron mucho que envejeciera Michael para realizar su despedida de tal forma que solo vimos residuos de Michael y no el verdadero que nos tenía acostumbrados.
@@santiagolunapatino9224 No digo que el 30th aniversario fue malo, pero vi a Michael desmejorado, triste, sin ganas de dar su último y mejor espectáculo , ya entiendo que tenía 43 años pero creo que pudo haber realizado un espectáculo muy similar a sus años jóvenes.
@@santiagolunapatino9224 Curiosamente en this is it vi a un Michael más parecido como era antiguamente quizás muy delgado estaba que si hubiera estado con mejor peso, hubiera estado perfecto pero lamentablemente el destino fue egoísta y nos lo arrebato muy pronto.
Dancing:Bucharest
Singing:Wembley
Magic:Both!
ASAP Dancing:Wembley
Singing:Wembley
Marco Buonamassa tbh I prefer both,like they are both Michael Jackson idk people argue about it😒😒
@@Marco-ew4gd bucharest winner.
ASAP I prefer both as well
Marco Buonamassa - facts. And if he still did the circle glide like in Yokohama and Tokyo with that amazing moonwalk in ‘88, it would reign even more superior
Wembley he's more aggressive and calculated with his movements, he's feeling the groove differently that day. In Bucharest he's more loose, free-flowing and just enjoying himself, he's feeling the groove differently that day. Both great performances.
Dancing: Bucharest '92 (smoothest moves and moonwalk of all time + crazy energy)
Singing: Wembley' 88 (his best live Billie Jean vocals ever, PERFECT executed)
Eh no, there are performances with better dancing than Bucharest and better vocals than Wembley
Two of my all time favourite Billie Jean performances. It's like choosing between the sun and the moon
See you can't really can't compare Michael to Michael it's just Michael the greatest ever
-god as soon as m.j started his solo career
Both are great! But my favorite is wembley because he´s more happy and full of energy there! Also i like the instrumental in wembley more.
Billie Jean live in bucharest is absolutely insane! He looks like a real robot there!
Wembley is Way better but the Dance and the Instruments are Nearer to the Mowtown Version
@@thekingofpopproductions4877 tbh I like both but bucharest seems more hyped and Wembley calm both are good I can't chose
The real robot dance goes to HIStory. HIStory Tour did better Robot than Dangerous.
While he was still at the top of his game dancing wise in 88 and many years prior, he didn’t reach his full “powers” and have that extra special touch until around the Dangerous era. 1992 wins for me.
This is 100 percent true he’s more free flowing and aggressive in wembly but in Bucharest he’s more calculated and perfect because he’s more experience and has finally reached his peak
Bucharest 92
Looks more...iconic to me
And his energy was 😳
The winner is doubtlessly Dangerous Tour 1992. Way better in everything, especially in dancing. You can clearly see that he's way smoother and energetic during the Dangerous Tour.
MJ was energetic in Bad tour and smoother in dangerous tour
Steve Lecci u sure? Bad’s moonwalk is faster and the hee hoo dance also is faster and how do u come up with burcharest beig faster, bad even needed to go on slowmo for 4 sec’s for burcharst.
He had problems with his vocal cord
The dancing is slightly better at Bucharest but he still moved REALLY smooth in Wembley also he was experiencing at this time how to move and learn new moves even after 5 years from his first Billie jean but idk why the vocals got rough right after the dangerous tour
Witch concert is Better
WEMBLEY:LIKE
BUCHAREST:COMMENT
Bucharest
Bucharest
Both
1992
Greatest of all times then and now! MJ FOREVER THE KING!!!!❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
he’s more free flowing and aggressive in wembly but in Bucharest he’s more calculated and perfect because he’s more experience and has finally reached his peak
Should probably do another version with the bad world tour audio for a fair contest.. I personally believe Dangerous performance was better in dancing, energy and crowd reaction but the bad tour version is better in terms of vocals, also sounding like the studio version, the bad era swag and attitude was better to watch but dangerous was MJ in his prime in almost every category.. just noticeably over the years it became harder for him to dance and sing at the same time whilst maintaining vocals that sounded like the studio version. .. which is why HIStory was mainly playback and a lot slower.
True
Moonwalk minute 3:32
bad tour bille jean he looks magical and amazing
At the bad tour michael is more energetic, he has a lot of moves, in 92 michael is more robotic, both moonwalk is so satisfying for me! But 1992 Mj wins for me
I Mean, At The end of the day, THEY'RE BOTH MICHAEL JACKSON.
He looked more into it in 1992
I Think not
Bruh he was a bit more relaxed than bad and HIStory tours
mick3y n. Lazy*
The winner is....... The Bad Tour 1988
Marco Buonamassa Dangerous Tour 1992 is way better
MJJackson HD No,I prefer the Bad Tour Wembley 1988
@@stefanoleccisotto2183 opinions my opinion is Bad Tour 1988
@@Marco-ew4gd same
That are opinions guys. Mamma mia!
That was really really fun & entertaining!! Thanks so much! 😆😆
His face was more natural and he looked more healthy and animated in 1988...
In my opinion he looked best in the bad era. Should have stopped plastic surgery there or in the 90's because it really affected what he looked like in the 2000's
@@commanderglitch1013 Michael did a lot of plastic surgeries in his nose to reconstruct, because it collapsed, and he didn't have a lot of new plastic surgeries in the 90s, he just changed his hair (wigs), his skin got clearer and he used to use a lot of makeup, he just did a lot of plastic surgeries in the 2000s to continue young and he modified his lips, but fortunately, he reconstructed his nose in 2003/2005 and it made his appearance better, but he was so better in bad era, he just had surgeries at his nose and his chin at this age.
@@BrenoDesign and he still looked like the Michael Jackson that people knew but a different skin colour
Always wembley and Bad tour i love this era wembley wins ans have the better moonwalk and thats my favourite mj concert
Mr. Jackson MJ during 1987-1989 was the best, my favourite era. At his peak.
Bucharest has the best moonwalk, followed by Munich 1992 and Wembley 1988
@@mohammadsufian7890 dont forget royal Concert moonwalk
Clearly the Dangerous version is much better...although around that time it begins the personal decline of MJ
Geo K Don't want to be rude or something but in dangerous he fighted with them high ass notes he couldn't reach them
David Dankey i heard both versions..of course in 1988 he was 4 years younger but i didnt found great difference in voice..u could say that in 1992 he had more help from his co-singers..but the overall show at 1992 live is much much greater than the 1988 one..smoother , with more dancing moves ,accurate timing of everything!
Geo K but 1988 is faster tho like look at the moonwalk he does the bowling move like 2x faster than burcharest and the spin also is faster.
4:15 OMG SAME!!!!
Dangerous tour
Maravilhoso de qualquer jeito.
Obrigada
Obrigada
Wembley 1988
The only video on this channel without an excessive amount of “Dwayne The Rock Johnson” comments
Amazing MJ FOREVER THE KING!!!❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Es raro ver a Michael Jackson que todavía seguía siendo un hombre de color, cuando en la entrevista con Opra Winfrey, Jackson menciona que el problema del vitíligo comenzó un poco después de la época de "thriller"' y eso fue entre 1984 y 1985 durante el proyecto de "We are the world". Esto en cambio, es 1988, ya había pasado el álbum "Bad", que se realizó un año atrás, y ahí, Michael ya era de tez blanca. Yo más bien podría suponer que Michael fue totalmente blanco, apartir del cuarto álbum como solista, que es ese discazo "Dangerous". Si alguien sabe el dato lo agradeceré, pero yo supongo que ha deber sido como lo he redactado.
fernandototototote Te lo voy a resumir:
en la era bad como las manchas cubrían menos del 50% de su cuerpo, ocultaba con maquillaje las manchas blancas. En cambio en la era dangerous donde las manchas superaban el 50% decidió ponerse maquillaje blanco en todo el cuerpo
En la era Bad y hasta antes de la era Dangerous no utilizaba un sólo tipo de color de maquillaje. Por ejemplo en los AMA's de 1989 se lo ve super palido pero en los Oscars de 1991 con Madonna se lo vuelve a ver un poco mas moreno. En la era Dangerous ya opto por el blanco definitivo. Ten en cuenta que la iluminación influye muchisimo.
Concuerdo con las 2 respuestas anteriores...
Michael menciona que pudo haber sido durante Off the wall o Thriller cuando empezó el vitiligo... En la portada de Bad, es la edición de la imagen la razón por la que parece blanco. Sin embargo hay muchas fotos de 1986, 1987 y 1988 donde se lo ve bastante moreno. Utilizaba maquillaje, incluso durante Thriller y se notaba mucho en su cara... La iluminación y los flashes influían mucho en como se veía. Y como en la epoca de Bad la enfermedad aún no estaba tan avanzada, todavía utilizaba maquillaje oscuro para cubrir las zonas despigmentadas, sobre todo la cara. Lo que noto tambien es que en algun momento de 1988 comenzó a maquillarse las manos y parte de los dedos, ya que durante ese mismo año y el anterior todavía tenía las manos como en Thriller... Aunque tambien es cierto que tenía la tez un poco mas clara que en Thriller.
Obviamente en Dangerous ya era totalmente blanco, tanto por el maquillaje que empezó a utilizar, como por el mayor avance del vitiligo...
Saludos!
El mejor es Bucharest porque el baile era mejor y habían nuevos pasos
Bucharest was better ......
I know that Michael 's moonwalk is and will forever unique...
Wembley is always better
Moonwalker Jackson no
Bucharest has the longest moonwalk here
The winner is...
Oh who am I kidding! There is no winner. Michael wins.
He pretty much also looked the same
Nathan Lopez just a different skin color and a different hairstyle
@@robertgee9361 it's literally the same hair. Just the Dangerous Tour hair was Longer
MJKING new wig I think
@@aramiyunstaley9514 MICHAEL DIDN'T WORE WIGS UNTIL 1995
@Ñ that's not true silly. Google michael jackson in 1986 vs 1987 and you'll see obviously he has a wig on. No shame in it, it's not his fault
Bad tour
I vote 1988 cause in some moves he missed up like the shuffle he did in the end he did a step instead of sliding like normal
I love this,Michael and you MJJF are a miths very good video!!!
Mmmmmmm q pasada de vídeo me gusta muchísimo volverlo a ver y oírlo me encanta mucho cada vez que lo veo es como si lo tuviera delante bailando y cantando siempre te llevaré en lo más profundo de mi corazón ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Now we add in HIStory tours in here,and we got us a true m.j concert vs. m.j concert
Wembley won
1992 let me clear anything he does I loves 💚💚👍🏽
i like wembley best
Great job!
No love for Victory Tour Billie Jean performance?
I love that performance
It's terrible compared to dangerous tour tbh
@@ramiqudimat its still a good performance tour tho
@@ramiqudimat what are u talking about?, yeah, maybe in dancing was not like Wembley or Bucharest, but still good, and the vocals were amazing.
Wassap Brothers No.
I would say Bucharest 1992 would win.
What's your choice?
Bucharest 1992 -> czcams.com/video/DeVqllxhoe8/video.html ?
OR
Wembley (London) 1988 -> czcams.com/video/BMZogxtiTis/video.html ?
Make your choice!
Team wembley
winner bad tour wembley
The only thing that I don’t like about dangerous tour is that the camera is moving like Michael Jackson so I prefer a bad tour but dangerous is the best
en estilo gana bucharest pero en voz wembley y en baile también
Michael Jackson knew Bucharest was being Aired live which why he had to rock the house and it has better energy.
Billie jean in bucharest dangerous tour 1992 winner
Cute R.I.P. Mj 1958-2009
Bad Wembley is the best
Never noticed that MJ has no glove during Dangerous Tour :o
he had it on before removing it midway through the song.
He throws it off
3:24 The Moonwalk Sequence
the longest moonwalks
Dwayne the rock Johnson 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
Something this did confirmed for me is that he does freestyle in BJ‼️
I have MJ HAT signed all my love MJ, ppl says it’s worth $800 I don’t believe that ‼️
1988
3:19
0:10 different entrance
The winner is bucharest beacuse the moonwalk was more longer than wembley 1988
Its not important
The winer is bad tour 1988😍
Yo creo que gana wembley porque en la gira bad la cantaba completamente en vivo y billie jean es una de sus ultimas canciones hací que se imaginaran cantar y bailar en un concierto* al estilo Michael* Y hacerlo como lo hace en el concierto, de verdad en esa gira si que se desenvolvió de verdad aunque hay que recalcar en la gira Dangerous es muy buena pero ahí ya empezó a utilizar en PlayBack debido a los problemas con su voz y ya no tenia la misma edad que cuando empezó el bad tour que fue a los 29.
En realidad a partir de 1996 con history tour es donde se ve que el paso del tiempo ya le pasa factura y más con sus problemas de voz , hizo que history tour no tuviera el mismo impacto que bad y dangerous tour a nivel de artista, se puede concluir que como artista su maxima plenitud fue desde 1982 hasta 1995 en la MTV awards que podemos ver a Michael todavía ágil y con vitalidad pese a las denuncias de 1993. Y respecto al 30th anniversary esperaron mucho que envejeciera Michael para realizar su despedida de tal forma que solo vimos residuos de Michael y no el verdadero que nos tenía acostumbrados.
@@diegofenix2012 no concuerdo, el 30 aniversario fue increíble, y el history tour causo mucho impacto, es mi opinion
@@santiagolunapatino9224 No digo que el 30th aniversario fue malo, pero vi a Michael desmejorado, triste, sin ganas de dar su último y mejor espectáculo , ya entiendo que tenía 43 años pero creo que pudo haber realizado un espectáculo muy similar a sus años jóvenes.
@@diegofenix2012 pero en THIS IS IT se lo veía increíble
@@santiagolunapatino9224 Curiosamente en this is it vi a un Michael más parecido como era antiguamente quizás muy delgado estaba que si hubiera estado con mejor peso, hubiera estado perfecto pero lamentablemente el destino fue egoísta y nos lo arrebato muy pronto.
Wish hbo did a tapping of the Bad Tour
can you give me link to both concerts ??
Or Publish Them on www.dailymotion.com/fr Please
Gueddouh Islam You can download both concerts in this pagin: www.giancarlovelazco.com
go to mjhideout and you will find them.
Eh if i was you i would have use the REAL unedited version of bucharest to make it fair xd
Quem não conhece acha que são dois cantores diferentes
Douglas Santos vdd
Michael em 1988 estava moreno,em 1992 totalmente branco
I dont like his neck bend when moonwalking, why he do like that??
To make moonwalk Illusion.
Dangerous Tour.
is one is a live vocal or lip synch?
They're both live history tour is playback
@@nathanlopez5667 None of them are even HIStory tour
No, both live but we can only listen to Bucharest in this video
Bucharest wins
1992
Бедные шляпы
Sounds weird
Yeh ones black and the others white
shit i didnt know thanks for informing me
El king of pop👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎵🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
Wembley 1988
1988
Dwayne the rock Johnson 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑