Yes that's it. Wow, I see the difference now. These deeper thoughts make me so enthusiastic about math again. I want to study it all and hoop you will be our guide for a long time and for many subjects. Than you.
Is it correct to say that the left hand side of the expression is a noun (collection of vectors) while the right hand side is an adjective (mathematical expression which is a description of the null space)?
Wouldn't it be more correct - or at least less ambiguous - to put curly braces around the right side of the equation, denoting it as a set rather than an equality?
Yes, that would be more correct and I used to do that with my class. But then I realized that it would also be unnecessarily more formal so I started using the less formal notation. (Also, you can think of both alpha and beta as sets: each one stands for the set of all real numbers.)
Go to LEM.MA/LA for videos, exercises, and to ask us questions directly.
Yes that's it. Wow, I see the difference now. These deeper thoughts make me so enthusiastic about math again. I want to study it all and hoop you will be our guide for a long time and for many subjects. Than you.
Is it correct to say that the left hand side of the expression is a noun (collection of vectors) while the right hand side is an adjective (mathematical expression which is a description of the null space)?
I believe that's accurate.
so wouldn't it be more accurate to wright the expression of the null space as the null set........ { N : a[x] +b[y] } ?
lol i didnt read below
Wouldn't it be more correct - or at least less ambiguous - to put curly braces around the right side of the equation, denoting it as a set rather than an equality?
Yes, that would be more correct and I used to do that with my class. But then I realized that it would also be unnecessarily more formal so I started using the less formal notation. (Also, you can think of both alpha and beta as sets: each one stands for the set of all real numbers.)