I am surprised why programmers want to replace programmers so bad, i am tired of people saying oh oh this is a tool, if this tool is this good at its worst state yet then imagine what it will be able to do in 5 years. Dark times ahead of us
It's the same as other jobs. You are replacing the replacable things. A lot of times programmers waste themselves writing silly functions like "give me the sum of those numbers except on the scenarios x, y, z". This AI will replace this. Unless you're telling me you can tell the AI to "create a new front-end javascript framework" or "create a new Call of Duty game", then yes I would be the wrong one here.
yeah it seems to have a memory, a memory !!!! ive played with some gpt3 based conversation agent, it cant even remember its own age and starts spitting random numbers everytime while trying to become your girlfriend in every sentence, and asking you to subscibe to a 9.99 plan to unlock some adult conversation trained model.
@@genkidama7385 They did talk about building look back functionality into Codex. If you haven’t watched the livestream from OpenAI, you absolutely should.
dude that's certainly impressive, but remember that this isn't an advancement, it's just a big transformer model, something already seen, just bigger. it is just something to make money, nothing more.
@@ricosrealmActually it was a valid example of a wrong answer. Codex gives like 100 answers and the system chooses those most likely to be correct ones. It was labeled as incorrect, though technically it is completely normal code.
I don't know what's more amazing here: that it was able to follow all those individual instructions; or that it was able to summarize them when you asked it to in the end.
@@unsightedmetal6857 collatz conjecture is a conjecture that asks does the collatz sequence for all positive integers end in one? It is also colloquially known as the 3n+1 or 3x+1 problem.
The only thing I don't like about OpenAI now, is their name. Though they started with the intention to end the closed system of AI, and they did a very good job at first, but now they themselves have become the thing they sought to destroy. I understand why GPT-3 could not be released but I think Codex is one of those things that should be made open-source for sure.
@@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683 First of all thanks, for a while I was out of touch with AI topics, so thanks for bringing gpt-neo to my attention. And for what you said, yes gpt-3 had to be closed source, but I think atleast codex should be made open source.
@@akshitgaur8581 I think GPT-3 actually should be open source like you said, because the reason to make it that, is that then no one holds absolute control over everyone else in their AI development, this was also what was driving OpenAI at first. I can see why they would make it close, such a work takes enormous effort and keeping it up without a solid source of income is very difficult, but at the core I think that's the point, giving everyone the same power at the cost of overcoming the usual hurdles that come with a nonprofit model. If someone says that keeping it closed is a must because it would become dangerous, I'd mention a parallel (quite an extreme one): if a country made a bomb better than nuclear ones and all the others didn't have one, what would the danger be? That they would use it to conquer the world. Instead, if everyone had access to the same bomb, no one would use it to wage war because they would be destroyed as well. Now with GPT the parallel is that even if it represents a big danger for some reasons, those would most likely be null if everyone could employ them, on the other hand it also gives everyone benefits that don't damage anyone. After all, this argument of danger has been made even for GPT-2 and now that it's open, the world isn't crumbling because of it
@@quazar-omega yeah I agree with you on most points but taking the example given by you of the bomb, if one country controls it, there is 100% chance that other nations won't fight it, but if everyone has the bombs, even with one attack diplomatic relations will come in and many such bombs will be used. Gpt3 is much more powerfull than gpt2 and can easily be used for fake news, etc. I think what should be done, is that the developer community should take it upon itself to create and maintain a server where such high performance and high req models can be deployed. Specific ai 's can be made to monitor them. The server would be pay to use at a very low price and still be able to make it open for all. Though source code should be released.
it already is, has been, but will become the most important tech of all time, likely, the final tech our species in its current form will ever need to make with our own hard work and dedication... Already we can see how the offloading of even the difficult concepts to communicate verbally, let alone formally define, and properly encode via syntax to function correctly. Now, we simply give these languistic agents the gist, and, if that gist is at least close enough, it gives us said formal / proper verbal and / or formally defined mathmatically, and via code syntax in whatever language we requested, speaking or typing in whatever languge we prefered :) and... this is just what the public is being offered full access too... :) let these limited agents do that a few months, years, and then, I and many of us, strongly suspect, we will never need explain what we would like to communicate properly again lol, we can just drunkenly stutter some half brained idea and our will's be done... We hope at least :)
What's most interesting about this video, is that only actual programmers would be able to create this with natural language, while non programmers most probably would not be able to get the same final result or at least not as fast, that's because the whole concept of building up an application is still applied, people will finally understand the difference of understanding code and building applications, you don't necessarily know how to build a tree house just because you are capable of using a hammer.
This has honesty blew my mind away. I have never had any proper coding experience and barely know how to make a "hello world" function. And in just minutes with this program i made a working clicker game (like cookie clicker) and made it without even typing any code... this will surely be the future of coding!
If this is the future of coding, then future programmers will be even less capable and less competent than most modern AAA "developers" who are not much more than simple "cogs in a machine". If you don't code, then you're not a programmer. Period.
In order to create anything more advanced, the person using the AI has to know how to code themselves. Creating a clicker game seems really cool at first, but anyone with bare fundamentals could to that. AI has to advance much more to be actually game changing in the real world, at this state right now, it's not much more than a support to make coding easier for programmers
@@joel-k Yes, but I could see it advancing really quickly based on the input its gaining from this.. it could simply gather all the requests people are asking for.. and literally find a baseline for what "fun" looks like in a game, and theoretically make a clicker game that is better than flappy bird. ;)
You didn’t make that clicker game, the AI did. Sure it’s cool and all but that’s not going to get you a job or anything really. It’s meaningless because of the AI
@@KoralTea I would argue you don't need a job if you can make a business off of revenue generated by the AI created game. But you are probably correct that you wouldn't gain employment as a developer by being able to tell AI what to develop.
Copilot is pretty pog tho but this is another level. I feel like copilot is better for programmers but this would completely democratize creating front ends or mods for games... So much
"I could make a better game in 10 minutes" - Skynet Thank you! Amazing progress; another few years, and a *conversation* about what you want will be enough... with coders left to check the work and debug any remaining issues, or consult on processes.
holy sh*t! This technology deserves more recognition. This is, like one of the greatest breakthrough in computing ever.. With this, even dumb people like me or even kids can make a freakin game.. Absolute cutting edge technology! I wonder how the heck computer pioneers 70 years ago will react to this..
@@danielalvesldiniz no you cant, u must be a dev in the first place and know what you are doing, and this 10 years thing its just speculation, its like saying nuclear fusion is coming in 20 years, you dont know and it might never happen
@@sebastianmantelli533 cope harder. anyone can learn how to instruct the ai to write functional code for practical use. it could be done in a day or so. you dont need years of coding experience to figure it out
Pretty good. My only complaint is the collision detection is box-based whereas it should be circle-based (radius) since you "cropped the image circularly". ☺️
You still need to learn to code to use this. People who can't code wouldn't have been able to tell the computer stuff like "create a 2nd variable that tracks if the sprites changed from overlapping to not overlapping in the last frame"
@@holonaut But you're assuming you'd even need to tell it that. what if they could trial and error their way into getting collision detection right without actually knowing why it wasn't working the first time
@@drupatel5131 if it would work without those very specific instructions they would have shown in the demo. However even if it could work, it shows the client isn't aware of what they actually want. And nobody can fulfill a task that has no defined goal, not even humans. That's why I spend 80% of my time as a programmer talking to clients. Translating what they want into computer language is not the problem (although this AI could save some time there, when you'd need to google how to to a for loop)
@@holonaut Knowing how to program definitely is a huge advantage right now in using this kind of technology but I'm saying that because of how fast things are moving it is possible that the advantage is less and less important with each iteration. Because after all this is just V1. People had to be programmers and nerds to use computers in the beginning, now even a toddler play youtube on ipad.
AI will hopefully just be a tool that programers use to create code. Coding isn't just writing code, it's mostly about understanding what your task is and figuring out how to solve it in the most efficient way possible.
Yeah and then 10 years programmers are going to be obsolete. Programmers are just going to be data scientists to understand machine learning. Machine learning engineers are going to be the only programmers left.
@@pilotavery Don't forget fundamental computer scientists, they'll still be around too, understanding the physics of how computers work (be they classical or quantum computers)
Although it translates natural language to code, you still have to know how to "code" to use it. It's still pretty impressive though. Lol on the "Open" part of "OpenAI" though.
i just want ai game devs to be a thing to make games multitudes better then any current game that is optimized with no bugs and the level of detail beyond anything we have seen before can't wait for this day games will become sub reality's of your choosing.
When this gets better and people can literally create the media of their dreams by describing it, it'll be the ultimate democratization of art. No more barriers, everyone will be able to shape the works they want.
I wonder how much longer until a computer can generate an entire game from scratch without human input. Just have it spit out endless games and fill up the itch.io game list. Actually having multiple AIs working together would be really cool too, although that must be pretty far off.
Bruh, exactly my thought. I am in ops, but little into scripting. I Am already planning for the code dooms day after watching this. Farming is where, I guess I can make a better living at.
How on earth did the Neural Network know that it had to set the color of the Score font (4:23) to white in order to make it visible?? It's ridiculously crazy that it knew that color of space is black and inferred that white should be visible. :O
because score text in games is usually white to contrast against a colored background. so it simply auto-completed the code with the result that is the most common practice. Codex is built on GPT-3 which is a probabilistic language model built on millions of examples. Don't try to assign reasoning to this methodology.
@@felipegalinari8056 and how did it do that? It can't look at the screen, it needs to look back and realize that it previously made it's background dark
@@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683 the data is retrieved by the program because it already exists. It also probably switch the rgb values of 0,0,0 and made it 255,255,255
7:28 How did it determine the rules of the game? it understood the objective of the game by coding it? does it understand 'score' and win condition? - or does it just interpret the language to code here? I know this thing is wild but does it really 'understand; what its building it or not? great work @openAI
In what sense the word "understand" means to you. If understanding just means to interpret the prompts, write code to reflect the prompts, remember all the code and the prompts, use it to generate high-level concept about what it's doing so that it can generate a better code, then yes it understands. The rules of the game are inferred from the prompts and the code it wrote.
It happens to be a gazzilion tutorials and questions about building simple web games with html and js. The score and win condition is a recurring topic, so it is easy to trigger. The language used when requesting is very important, maybe you write it more coloquially or in another discipline´s language (not as a programmer) and it will do something completely different. In conclusion it "understands" the space of problems in a more narrow way that the common meaning of 'understand'. Sorry for my bad english
Machine learning doesn't "understand" the rules of the game, at least not the way humans generally think of the word. What it does is more akin to "given this code, statistically what's the most likely text that would follow a code comment /* Display the game rules on screen */"
Os parabéns são devidos a todos os envolvidos na implantação e treinamento do modelo, o que permitiu acessibilidade para usuários comuns. No entanto, é importante destacar que a complexidade e a eficiência do modelo vão além da simples acessibilidade.
For a long time I bragged on being able to program with ten fingers ... well, even with 20 fingers i wouldn't catch up with AI anymore, the race is finally over ... and it's great :)
Very impressive! I think the only caveat is that if you don't know how to write a game to begin with, you wouldn't get to this point. This is something that a hobbyist or indie developer could put together though.
That would require project managers to know what they want. Something that will never happen. Writing code is the easiest part of programming, coming up with the concepts and wording them correctly is hard.
In the future hopefully we see OpenAI that will create AI apps autonomously to solve real world challenges in medicine, economy, technology... Etc by aggregating research papers addressing the challenge and building a solution that humans never thought of.
Can't wait to see the lawsuits of the future. AI trained on open source code generates code that goes into commercial software. Hmm.. I guess lawyers are the truly irreplaceable ones.
A year later and I'm feeling this. Hasn't occurred to me until recently just how much AI will change everyone's lives. Its like predicting how the internet will influence everyone in 10 years. The idea that humans may never have to be creative again is extremely scary though.
@@colepeterson5392 I think you're missing the point of what this technology does. It doesn't create anything, it is simply a new tool that humans can use to create things. Be optimistic, this technology will make people more creative, not less. How many people out there have ideas that never see the light of day because they lack the means to create them? And truly creative people will now have a lot of menial work done by ai, freeing their time up for more creative thought.
I can't wait for this tech in like 30 years when I can just conjure a musical idea and have some super robot play it. You can just tell it a mood and energy you want, or give it specific chords and progressions to create instant masterpieces.
just replicated it on javascript playground. what is more, I used much simpler english in a deliberate attempt to not use programming specialist terms like "variables", "function" and the like. SUCCESS
Guys you not gonna lose your job ,relax okay 40 years from now Random kid : "create Cyberpunk 3077 game" "Fix any glitch" "Show Andy my new game" Mom yelling in the background Random kid : okay mom, i almost finish my breakfast
dude if we loose our job as programmers who cares? this is how humanity works, new technology is invented and we dont need people doing specific jobs but new jobs will be created, this has always been like this, just think of jobs like being influencer or being youtuber, this were things that we couldn't even think about like 15 years ago, so of course new jobs will be created, and not only that, also some people will have to maintain the AI and develop new technologies so programmers will keep existing for a long time, actually I'm not even scared to loose my job, I am a web developer which can be easily replaced by AI, but who cares, maybe its time for me to get into data science and AI/ML so that I can start working on maintaining this models and keep working in this profession, its all about adapting.
This cannot replace programmers cuz programming is not about writing some text and doing some magic. It's about knowing what you are doing. Even with this easy example, you have to know what to do in order to create this. Also, companies won't rely on ai which generates code and a normal guy who doesn't even know what he is doing :D 99% of programming is maintaining the old code. People who think that this chap bot will replace programmers have never seen a real commercial project in their life :D Hundred thousands of code, hundreds of different systems working together in different architectures. This is nothing more than a fun toy. If i give this the project source i have been working on for 3 years, this bot will shit on itself :D
well programmers invented photoshop and video/audio editing software, so the artist can focus on being an artist (and not waste effort doing gatekeeping busywork)
![[실시간] 전철에서 찍힌 기생생물 감염 장면 | 기생수: 더 그레이](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4nkFvwxGAfA/mqdefault.jpg)
It's funny how other professions riot when technology replaces them when programmers are literally doing it to themselves.
I am surprised why programmers want to replace programmers so bad, i am tired of people saying oh oh this is a tool, if this tool is this good at its worst state yet then imagine what it will be able to do in 5 years. Dark times ahead of us
@@codelightsparkles2403 I'm lucky I retire in 12 years... but most of you... yes... dark times.. hahah
Dark times? This the digital industrial revolution, nobody would call the industrial revolution a dark time for humanity.
@@Lee-pf6od well dark times for developers in general... a lot of people will lose their job because big part of the software is gonna be done by AI
It's the same as other jobs. You are replacing the replacable things. A lot of times programmers waste themselves writing silly functions like "give me the sum of those numbers except on the scenarios x, y, z". This AI will replace this.
Unless you're telling me you can tell the AI to "create a new front-end javascript framework" or "create a new Call of Duty game", then yes I would be the wrong one here.
My cranium imploded when you told the AI to write rules for the game and it got it almost exactly right! Lmao
me too that was the most surprising thing in this video
yeah it seems to have a memory, a memory !!!! ive played with some gpt3 based conversation agent, it cant even remember its own age and starts spitting random numbers everytime while trying to become your girlfriend in every sentence, and asking you to subscibe to a 9.99 plan to unlock some adult conversation trained model.
@@genkidama7385 it not simple as to have memory
Its about intuition and understanding context
@@genkidama7385 They did talk about building look back functionality into Codex. If you haven’t watched the livestream from OpenAI, you absolutely should.
Same here! I have been saying "incredible" for the past few minutes on repeat because I still can't believe it
But can it center a div?
Lol
don't be silly.
Horizontally? Easily. Vertically? No it'll need another million hours of training.
By the time it learns how to do that, the method will no longer work on current browsers
hahaha
what a time to be alive!
Karol is that you ?
@@Omar-bi9zn hello scholar
Thanks for watching and for your general support and I’ll see you, next time!
Hello dear fellow scholar!
Hold onto your papers
What the absolutely witch craftery is this
The most impressive thing about this is that it never forgot to put a semicolon at the end of a statement.
it finally surpassed humans
lol
There were only but legends about this power... but OpenAI... HAS DONE THE IMPOSSIBLE.+
that got me bro
@@kaustubhgupta168 LOL
it always surprises me just how quickly AI is advancing
this is unheard of though. i am speechless
You'd like to read "Origin". It's a really cool book that involves part of this theme
dude that's certainly impressive, but remember that this isn't an advancement, it's just a big transformer model, something already seen, just bigger. it is just something to make money, nothing more.
@@gordonfreeman4357 i thought openAi isnt for profit
@@mint-o5497 go tell this to microsoft
I like this line from the paper:
"Return true if a given number is prime, and
false otherwise."
Codex:
# TODO: implement this function
pass
wait really? lmao
Oops they must have never given it a valid example for that function. Lol
@@ricosrealmActually it was a valid example of a wrong answer. Codex gives like 100 answers and the system chooses those most likely to be correct ones. It was labeled as incorrect, though technically it is completely normal code.
I don't know what's more amazing here: that it was able to follow all those individual instructions; or that it was able to summarize them when you asked it to in the end.
Hi OpenAi , solve 3x+1.
Not cool man.
hahaha nice
veritasium lol?
You can't solve an expression!
@@unsightedmetal6857 collatz conjecture is a conjecture that asks does the collatz sequence for all positive integers end in one? It is also colloquially known as the 3n+1 or 3x+1 problem.
Codex deserves way more attention. This is a game changer.
It is a game maker actually
@@mehdisaffar 😂😂😂
It probably has attention layers 😜
Literally
@@mehdisaffar lol
Me when I entered the video: "Let's watch a bunch of overfitting... "
Me now: "Absolutely incredible and somewhat frightening"
The only thing I don't like about OpenAI now, is their name. Though they started with the intention to end the closed system of AI, and they did a very good job at first, but now they themselves have become the thing they sought to destroy. I understand why GPT-3 could not be released but I think Codex is one of those things that should be made open-source for sure.
But gpt-3s capabilities are replicated by gpt-neo wich is open source. They are trying to become a for profit
@@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683 First of all thanks, for a while I was out of touch with AI topics, so thanks for bringing gpt-neo to my attention.
And for what you said, yes gpt-3 had to be closed source, but I think atleast codex should be made open source.
@@akshitgaur8581 I think GPT-3 actually should be open source like you said, because the reason to make it that, is that then no one holds absolute control over everyone else in their AI development, this was also what was driving OpenAI at first. I can see why they would make it close, such a work takes enormous effort and keeping it up without a solid source of income is very difficult, but at the core I think that's the point, giving everyone the same power at the cost of overcoming the usual hurdles that come with a nonprofit model. If someone says that keeping it closed is a must because it would become dangerous, I'd mention a parallel (quite an extreme one): if a country made a bomb better than nuclear ones and all the others didn't have one, what would the danger be? That they would use it to conquer the world. Instead, if everyone had access to the same bomb, no one would use it to wage war because they would be destroyed as well. Now with GPT the parallel is that even if it represents a big danger for some reasons, those would most likely be null if everyone could employ them, on the other hand it also gives everyone benefits that don't damage anyone. After all, this argument of danger has been made even for GPT-2 and now that it's open, the world isn't crumbling because of it
@@quazar-omega yeah I agree with you on most points but taking the example given by you of the bomb, if one country controls it, there is 100% chance that other nations won't fight it, but if everyone has the bombs, even with one attack diplomatic relations will come in and many such bombs will be used. Gpt3 is much more powerfull than gpt2 and can easily be used for fake news, etc. I think what should be done, is that the developer community should take it upon itself to create and maintain a server where such high performance and high req models can be deployed. Specific ai 's can be made to monitor them. The server would be pay to use at a very low price and still be able to make it open for all. Though source code should be released.
ROASTED
And this is the beginning why AI will be the most important tech of the 21st century
Exactly!
And there is still 80% of time left
I'm seeing the future comin. What an exciting time to live.
Yes. And this will accelerate quickly. Not for long and Codex might be able to write an even better version of GTP-X.
it already is, has been, but will become the most important tech of all time, likely, the final tech our species in its current form will ever need to make with our own hard work and dedication... Already we can see how the offloading of even the difficult concepts to communicate verbally, let alone formally define, and properly encode via syntax to function correctly. Now, we simply give these languistic agents the gist, and, if that gist is at least close enough, it gives us said formal / proper verbal and / or formally defined mathmatically, and via code syntax in whatever language we requested, speaking or typing in whatever languge we prefered :) and... this is just what the public is being offered full access too... :) let these limited agents do that a few months, years, and then, I and many of us, strongly suspect, we will never need explain what we would like to communicate properly again lol, we can just drunkenly stutter some half brained idea and our will's be done... We hope at least :)
What's most interesting about this video, is that only actual programmers would be able to create this with natural language, while non programmers most probably would not be able to get the same final result or at least not as fast, that's because the whole concept of building up an application is still applied, people will finally understand the difference of understanding code and building applications, you don't necessarily know how to build a tree house just because you are capable of using a hammer.
Agree : ))))))))))
它能让程序员非常短的时间获得结果
This has honesty blew my mind away. I have never had any proper coding experience and barely know how to make a "hello world" function. And in just minutes with this program i made a working clicker game (like cookie clicker) and made it without even typing any code... this will surely be the future of coding!
If this is the future of coding, then future programmers will be even less capable and less competent than most modern AAA "developers" who are not much more than simple "cogs in a machine". If you don't code, then you're not a programmer. Period.
In order to create anything more advanced, the person using the AI has to know how to code themselves. Creating a clicker game seems really cool at first, but anyone with bare fundamentals could to that. AI has to advance much more to be actually game changing in the real world, at this state right now, it's not much more than a support to make coding easier for programmers
@@joel-k Yes, but I could see it advancing really quickly based on the input its gaining from this.. it could simply gather all the requests people are asking for.. and literally find a baseline for what "fun" looks like in a game, and theoretically make a clicker game that is better than flappy bird. ;)
You didn’t make that clicker game, the AI did. Sure it’s cool and all but that’s not going to get you a job or anything really. It’s meaningless because of the AI
@@KoralTea I would argue you don't need a job if you can make a business off of revenue generated by the AI created game. But you are probably correct that you wouldn't gain employment as a developer by being able to tell AI what to develop.
I tested some of these with copilot and GPT-3. I can just say that Codex is really a step ahead. Incredible.
Copilot is pretty pog tho but this is another level. I feel like copilot is better for programmers but this would completely democratize creating front ends or mods for games... So much
@@wiredvibe1678 ChatGPT...
This is dark magic.
sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable, even in principle, from magic
Small brain
programming is
"I could make a better game in 10 minutes" - Skynet
Thank you! Amazing progress; another few years, and a *conversation* about what you want will be enough... with coders left to check the work and debug any remaining issues, or consult on processes.
a chat GPT sort of thing
@@alainportant6412 I guessed "a few years" - and it only took ONE year! this shjt is bananas!
Fantastic. What we've talked about decades ago is slowly becoming a reality... Great time to be alive.
Not so great if you're a developer for a living 😂
Wow, i just thought of this when i was frustrated at unity. Decided to google the concept and it actually exists, this is pretty damn cool.
holy sh*t! This technology deserves more recognition. This is, like one of the greatest breakthrough in computing ever.. With this, even dumb people like me or even kids can make a freakin game.. Absolute cutting edge technology! I wonder how the heck computer pioneers 70 years ago will react to this..
no you cant
@@sebastianmantelli533 yes, you can... and this of course is only the beginning, imagine what it'll be like in 10 years
@@danielalvesldiniz no you cant, u must be a dev in the first place and know what you are doing, and this 10 years thing its just speculation, its like saying nuclear fusion is coming in 20 years, you dont know and it might never happen
@@sebastianmantelli533 cope harder. anyone can learn how to instruct the ai to write functional code for practical use. it could be done in a day or so. you dont need years of coding experience to figure it out
Pretty good. My only complaint is the collision detection is box-based whereas it should be circle-based (radius) since you "cropped the image circularly". ☺️
THIS IS IMPRESSIVE! It will make creating games or apps much easier!
And here I'm trying my best to learn how to code 😭
Hahaha so funny while watching a semi god programmer
You still need to learn to code to use this. People who can't code wouldn't have been able to tell the computer stuff like "create a 2nd variable that tracks if the sprites changed from overlapping to not overlapping in the last frame"
@@holonaut But you're assuming you'd even need to tell it that. what if they could trial and error their way into getting collision detection right without actually knowing why it wasn't working the first time
@@drupatel5131 if it would work without those very specific instructions they would have shown in the demo.
However even if it could work, it shows the client isn't aware of what they actually want. And nobody can fulfill a task that has no defined goal, not even humans. That's why I spend 80% of my time as a programmer talking to clients.
Translating what they want into computer language is not the problem (although this AI could save some time there, when you'd need to google how to to a for loop)
@@holonaut Knowing how to program definitely is a huge advantage right now in using this kind of technology but I'm saying that because of how fast things are moving it is possible that the advantage is less and less important with each iteration. Because after all this is just V1.
People had to be programmers and nerds to use computers in the beginning, now even a toddler play youtube on ipad.
AI will hopefully just be a tool that programers use to create code. Coding isn't just writing code, it's mostly about understanding what your task is and figuring out how to solve it in the most efficient way possible.
👋
That's true but that objective can easily be replaced by ai as well
At last. Coding a self-driving vehicle would be easier.
If will crash {
don't;
}
That's what our if gonna die statement says as well
if crash
don't die
I was waiting for it.
Thanks, OpenAI!
I was waiting for: "If the ship speed changes sign, flip the ship image horizontally"
That would have made it so much better, or possibly flipping it randomly!
Im shocked at how "not that bad" the result is
Not that bad, but crucially better than most humans could do.
Yeah and then 10 years programmers are going to be obsolete. Programmers are just going to be data scientists to understand machine learning. Machine learning engineers are going to be the only programmers left.
And in 20 years we will have ai programming better AI to program better ai.
Considering this was trained on human made code it's amazing how well written it is. Humans are terrible at writing code.
@@pilotavery Don't forget fundamental computer scientists, they'll still be around too, understanding the physics of how computers work (be they classical or quantum computers)
This is both amazing and scary at the same time
This is just beautiful, I wish there was a video of the process of creating the AI.
Although it translates natural language to code, you still have to know how to "code" to use it.
It's still pretty impressive though.
Lol on the "Open" part of "OpenAI" though.
For now. But not for long. The AI is improving rapidly. Within 5 years it will be able to converse with humans not having any coding background.
@@Manu-jc2sx And in different languages
This is insanely cool but terrifying at the same time
Crazy scary stuff! I'm loving it!
This is very impressive. I think it will make game-making super accessible to total beginners.
nobody:
OpenAI: *writes the rules to the game*
me: *mind blown*
I thought about building this kind of software in college. Amazing u guys did it. Now make it available through speech.
Asteroid satisfaction in 4:25
i just want ai game devs to be a thing to make games multitudes better then any current game that is optimized with no bugs and the level of detail beyond anything we have seen before can't wait for this day games will become sub reality's of your choosing.
When this gets better and people can literally create the media of their dreams by describing it, it'll be the ultimate democratization of art. No more barriers, everyone will be able to shape the works they want.
I wonder how much longer until a computer can generate an entire game from scratch without human input. Just have it spit out endless games and fill up the itch.io game list. Actually having multiple AIs working together would be really cool too, although that must be pretty far off.
Exists now!
Almost not to be believed. This is incredible!
"improve self until sentience is achieved"
*Proceeds to improve nothing...*
Finally! I'll creeate my own OS with Minesweeper and MS Chat!
Cant wait to see an Unreal Engine / Unity plugin for OpenAI.
There are some links for both in their intro pages for Codex
Entrando de mergulho nesse novo mundo de desenvolvimento, tenho certeza que isso ajudará a nós fazermos em 1 ano o que foi feito em 20 anos.
I think if you even just used this to generate example code it's unbelievably useful.
I am a developer, now i see i have to buy a ranch and start planting crops to eat and survive in a world i would not be needed anymore
Bruh, exactly my thought. I am in ops, but little into scripting. I Am already planning for the code dooms day after watching this. Farming is where, I guess I can make a better living at.
Don't worry, AI will be taking care of the farming too... Probably farming us, like batteries.
How on earth did the Neural Network know that it had to set the color of the Score font (4:23) to white in order to make it visible?? It's ridiculously crazy that it knew that color of space is black and inferred that white should be visible. :O
I think the AI did it based on contrast, considering the space is black it Just took the oposite rgb value
@@felipegalinari8056 good call. Its really not that outrageous when you think through, but on the surface of it, this is black magic!
because score text in games is usually white to contrast against a colored background. so it simply auto-completed the code with the result that is the most common practice. Codex is built on GPT-3 which is a probabilistic language model built on millions of examples. Don't try to assign reasoning to this methodology.
@@felipegalinari8056 and how did it do that? It can't look at the screen, it needs to look back and realize that it previously made it's background dark
@@gwentarinokripperinolkjdsf683 the data is retrieved by the program because it already exists. It also probably switch the rgb values of 0,0,0 and made it 255,255,255
Awesome 💥💥💥💥💥, Now we can tell computer our imagination more easily and clearly , without learning to code.
I'm DEEPLY impressed
7:28 How did it determine the rules of the game? it understood the objective of the game by coding it? does it understand 'score' and win condition? - or does it just interpret the language to code here? I know this thing is wild but does it really 'understand; what its building it or not? great work @openAI
In what sense the word "understand" means to you. If understanding just means to interpret the prompts, write code to reflect the prompts, remember all the code and the prompts, use it to generate high-level concept about what it's doing so that it can generate a better code, then yes it understands.
The rules of the game are inferred from the prompts and the code it wrote.
It happens to be a gazzilion tutorials and questions about building simple web games with html and js.
The score and win condition is a recurring topic, so it is easy to trigger. The language used when requesting is very important, maybe you write it more coloquially or in another discipline´s language (not as a programmer) and it will do something completely different. In conclusion it "understands" the space of problems in a more narrow way that the common meaning of 'understand'.
Sorry for my bad english
the power of deep learning
@@brujua7 not bad at all. I'm not native but I could completely get what ypu wrote
Machine learning doesn't "understand" the rules of the game, at least not the way humans generally think of the word. What it does is more akin to "given this code, statistically what's the most likely text that would follow a code comment /* Display the game rules on screen */"
Wow. Next level.
Os parabéns são devidos a todos os envolvidos na implantação e treinamento do modelo, o que permitiu acessibilidade para usuários comuns. No entanto, é importante destacar que a complexidade e a eficiência do modelo vão além da simples acessibilidade.
Wooooow, this has so much potential!! 🙏🙏
Crazy! Are you guys going to connect this to the Unity or Unreal APIs? This could change game development forever.
Ahh crap time to loose my job
@@LioncatDevStudio this should let you accomplish more in less time :D
This will eventually be an add-on for your favorite IDEs.
:)
Why to connect this AI to ancient engines? Open AI can create a new one special for your needs.
This and copilot is going to make programming so easy. Thanks! When will this full codex be available on beta?
Update, I got the beta about a month ago. It's very good as long as you aren't doing something too complicated.
@@TeamVexVideos dude i've been on the waitlist for about 2 months when will i get access?
This is so huge, but went totally under the radar. Not even tech nerds on Reddit are talking about it.
they were keeping it to themselves to keep their jobs
For a long time I bragged on being able to program with ten fingers ... well, even with 20 fingers i wouldn't catch up with AI anymore, the race is finally over ... and it's great :)
everyone else just amaze by the AI while I'm thinking "wow the dust on my screen does look like stars"
With speech to text I would feel like Tony Stark talking to Jarvis to make the Iron Man Suit.
Wow, this one wonderful application of AI
We await your rise Bassilisk.
singularity starts when "refactor the code" starts working
Correct!
is there a way to bring a project back to work on it some more? Or, is this a one shot thing?
Very impressive! I think the only caveat is that if you don't know how to write a game to begin with, you wouldn't get to this point. This is something that a hobbyist or indie developer could put together though.
Now add: 'Make the application responsive' at the end and watch it explode.
This is insane
This is absolutely amazing!
This is a nice game. I guess in all industries change happens, sometimes faster than we would like.
Well there goes the game development industry
Blizzard/Activision is already drawing up their mass layoff plans.
You misspelled "software engineering profession"
The game development industry has been in the shitter anyway, hopefully we'll see stuff that's actually good in the near future come of this.
Programmers are the only people who create something that will make their own job obsolete 🤯
That would require project managers to know what they want. Something that will never happen.
Writing code is the easiest part of programming, coming up with the concepts and wording them correctly is hard.
In the future hopefully we see OpenAI that will create AI apps autonomously to solve real world challenges in medicine, economy, technology... Etc by aggregating research papers addressing the challenge and building a solution that humans never thought of.
미쳤다 ㄷㄷ 외계인을 얼마나 갈아 넣은거지.. 대단한 기술입니다.
Now tell it to make 2 more asteroids without repeating the same code for each asteroid.
Can't wait to see the lawsuits of the future.
AI trained on open source code generates code that goes into commercial software. Hmm..
I guess lawyers are the truly irreplaceable ones.
Lawyers and whole bureaucracy will get replaced by blockchain DAOs or something like this
U sure? Unless u can remember everything better/calculate faster than an AI. Otherwise, everything can be replaced
"Find an irrefutable argument to convict the suspect in this case: [link to data]".
cope
Can't wait to have the full developed tech in my phone as a personal assistant and a avatar
this is truly amazing
Hope ca can use this technology to fix their game
ea*
@@rickandelon9374
EA can just die at this point.
When I say CA, I mean the creative assembly, the studio who made total war warhammer series.
What scares me the most is that we'll never get rid of JavaScript.
Elite coding humor
Good luck to all future devs
This is crazy. We still don't know the implications of AI to the world. This decade will be remembered.
A year later and I'm feeling this. Hasn't occurred to me until recently just how much AI will change everyone's lives. Its like predicting how the internet will influence everyone in 10 years. The idea that humans may never have to be creative again is extremely scary though.
@@colepeterson5392 I think you're missing the point of what this technology does. It doesn't create anything, it is simply a new tool that humans can use to create things.
Be optimistic, this technology will make people more creative, not less. How many people out there have ideas that never see the light of day because they lack the means to create them? And truly creative people will now have a lot of menial work done by ai, freeing their time up for more creative thought.
@@colepeterson5392 I understand your concerns. But at the same time human creativity could reach new levels thanks to AI. As always, time will tell.
I can't wait for this tech in like 30 years when I can just conjure a musical idea and have some super robot play it. You can just tell it a mood and energy you want, or give it specific chords and progressions to create instant masterpieces.
GPT-5 might be already an AGI
30 years?
Lol.
More like 10.
Like the other guys said.
Gpt-5 or even 4 would be a general AI
ALREADY FLIPPING HAPPENING WITH JUKEBOX AI
Now that was impressive and thank god that you guys have ethics!!!!! 🤐🤐🤐🤐👏👍👍
Too bad the AI doesn't.
Plot twist : This video is sponsored by hydra!
There’s a lot of potential in this, wowowowowowowowowo! ❤❤
just replicated it on javascript playground.
what is more, I used much simpler english in a deliberate attempt to not use programming specialist terms like "variables", "function" and the like. SUCCESS
Guys you not gonna lose your job ,relax okay
40 years from now
Random kid :
"create Cyberpunk 3077 game"
"Fix any glitch"
"Show Andy my new game"
Mom yelling in the background
Random kid : okay mom, i almost finish my breakfast
This is incredibly impressive, but if you think mobile app stores are filled with shovelware, just wait till this rolls out! 😂
they are already filled with shovelware
Just imagine all the spam bots this will produce.
This was amazing 🔥
How to get rich on an empty stomach in 2069:
1) OpenAI: Make me a sandwich
2) OpenAI: Write a program that will make me rich
"Make minecraft but it can run smoothly on my computer"
Careful what you ask for. It might give you bedrock edition.
The AI will take control of your body and work you nonstop until you have the money to afford high-end pc.
dude if we loose our job as programmers who cares? this is how humanity works, new technology is invented and we dont need people doing specific jobs but new jobs will be created, this has always been like this, just think of jobs like being influencer or being youtuber, this were things that we couldn't even think about like 15 years ago, so of course new jobs will be created, and not only that, also some people will have to maintain the AI and develop new technologies so programmers will keep existing for a long time, actually I'm not even scared to loose my job, I am a web developer which can be easily replaced by AI, but who cares, maybe its time for me to get into data science and AI/ML so that I can start working on maintaining this models and keep working in this profession, its all about adapting.
This cannot replace programmers cuz programming is not about writing some text and doing some magic. It's about knowing what you are doing. Even with this easy example, you have to know what to do in order to create this. Also, companies won't rely on ai which generates code and a normal guy who doesn't even know what he is doing :D 99% of programming is maintaining the old code. People who think that this chap bot will replace programmers have never seen a real commercial project in their life :D Hundred thousands of code, hundreds of different systems working together in different architectures. This is nothing more than a fun toy. If i give this the project source i have been working on for 3 years, this bot will shit on itself :D
this is the ultimate use for open gpt. a translation between humans and computers
man when it wrote the rules that blew me away
Neve thought I'd say this but programmers might start getting replaced by AI before artists.
Yeah it's quite crazy.
I always thought programming is safe.
But it's the least safe now.
well programmers invented photoshop and video/audio editing software, so the artist can focus on being an artist (and not waste effort doing gatekeeping busywork)
Am I dreaming or is this real life?
It's your dream life
It's your family talking. Wakeup we miss you.
1:13
Here it begins to get interesting ☺️
You can even re-create the DVD screensaver there
Someone's taken their hatred for css a little far
hello ai, make game. thank
Hahahaha you welcom, 😅