I am soooo grateful to you for doing this comparison test, it is exactly what I needed! Wanted to let you know, the pieces fell in from the side with the navigator. YOU ROCK!!!
Those expensive ones have one advantage and thatâs build quality. Those machines will probably last 15-20 years easily. Most likely even longer. But these vacuum still work amazingly well at a good price and will still last you a good long while. Sharks are great!
Awesome! All 3 of these vacuums are amazing and my personal pick in the vertex since it cleans a little better and has a few more bells and whistles. But the apex is an amazing choice that I still use all the time
How do you compare the Apex to the Stratos? I find the apex appealing for easy access to the brush rolls but Stratos seems to be cheaper right now than Apex.
The stratos is better than the vertex when it comes to cleaning. The apex was truthfully never that great at carpets, but the stratos is much much better. It also has a much better bin system, as well as anti tangle brush roll. Not having access to the brushroll has not been a problem for me personally, and I havenât seen complaints online. I personally prefer the vertex over both because I think itâs balanced better and is the easiest to maneuver. But it is extremely similar to the stratos. Overall, itâs better than the apex in just about every way. Other than the little light on the handle, I do miss that.
Great video I was wondering your opinion on other reviews Iâve seen which bash shark vacuums claiming theyâre false advertising. I wanted to purchase of one their vacuums but I was looking for other reviews
A lot of people do like to bash shark and say their stuff is terrible and false advertising. The 100% truth is they are great machines that work really well for their price. The people that say they are horrible own $800 vacuums. Not everyone can afford that. And in my tests, sharks have done better than the expensive machines. So for the price they are great. And as long as you wash the filter and do maintenance on them. They will last a decent amount of time. Average life of a shark is about 7 years. But I own one that Iâve had for 10 years and itâs still going strong.
@@DillonCleans thanks your your reply, I was in doubt because I recently came across this YT channel named âPerformance Reviewsâ that seems to have a strong dislike for Sharkâs products. He showed its performance as being very lackluster, leaving behind large amounts of debris compared to bagged vacuums which he claims are significantly better. His tests all demonstrated the sharks with minimal suction power, although they did come off as biased and unfair. This is why I questioned the authenticity of Sharks which I hoped to order.
@@imaginemyshocko1455 performance reviews is a channel run by someone who has a strong hatred for anything bagless and not Miele, sebo, or central vac. The truth is not everyone can afford them. And his âbudget picksâ in my opinion arenât good. His tests are very flawed and I have spoken to many other CZcamsrs about them. He makes sharks and Dysons and really anything bagless seem like a piece of garbage. He isnât very nice as a person himself. He is an adult who has sort of been known to throw little fits when people donât agree with him. And he even told me ( a minor ) to kill myself. And this isnât my opinion on him. These are facts on him. These are things heâs actually done and said. I donât associate myself with him in any way shape or form. I congratulate him on his knowledge, expertise, and dedication to his work as well as his videos. However, he doesnât like to admit the truth. And thatâs what some people have realized about him. And why he has a poor reputation with other collectors. Now as for shark vacuums, they are probably the best thing you can get for you buck. They work well. Have great features. Clean well. And for a good price. Wonât last 20 years like a sebo. But will work a lot better in the time that it is around.
@iMaGiNeMyShOcK /o\ I used to watch that channel and recently unsubscribed because of his bias. I debated bagged vs. Bagless, and he kept telling me basically that I was wrong. He's convincing, I'll give him that, but as a so-called professional, he doesn't have an open mind at all and pushes expensive, bagged every time. Dillon is awesome and check out Vacuum Wars also. He doesn't seem to have any bias
Shark just came out with a new upright it call the Shark Stratos upright with a new mechanism for emptying the bin and it has odor reduction technology.
Iâve heard of it and I know I would love it. I do plan on getting it however itâs nearly identical to the vertex, so unless you need that odor eliminator, the vertex would be just about as good. But I do plan on getting it in the coming months
@@DillonCleans the stratos has bristles where the the vertex has flaps . so i think shark came to the conclusion that the flaps might not agitate or hold up as long as bristles do . thats what i like about the old navigator good old school bristles and no front roller to get filthy.
@@DillonCleans as of right now if you donât have it yet and want it, the stratos is on sale for 299 instead of 429 and the current vertex is 400 instead of 499. 20% discount on apex, 30% on stratos. Putting a vaccum on my wedding registry is why Iâm looking into it now.
@@sebastiankerizzle9013 I say the vertex because itâs basically the exact same vacuum but cheaper. But if you got it 40% off then thatâs great!! No reason for buyers remorse all youâre gonna love it!
Well. Depends on the application. For a lot of carpets and a lot of dirt, a Dyson upright would be best. For a smaller home that wants cordless, a Dyson is best. For a home with a lot of combination of flooring, a lot of furniture and needs a good cleaning no matter what it is, Shark will be much better. And shark is more affordable. I personally prefer shark. But I certainly do love Dyson. I do have a lot after all
I am soooo grateful to you for doing this comparison test, it is exactly what I needed! Wanted to let you know, the pieces fell in from the side with the navigator. YOU ROCK!!!
loved all the materials u used to showcase this, it was a great comparison!!!
YESSS!!! Iâve been waiting for this!
Loved this comparison! đđŻđđđđđđ
This is the type of video I was looking for. Lot's of people talking too and showing no function of the vacuums. Thanks for this.
Amazing !!
Love the vertex!
I just came from your expensive vacuum video and wow, thank you I don't not feel bad for not having those ones anymore.
Those expensive ones have one advantage and thatâs build quality. Those machines will probably last 15-20 years easily. Most likely even longer. But these vacuum still work amazingly well at a good price and will still last you a good long while. Sharks are great!
hey that riccar in that video has a bag and is so much cleaner hygenic machine than a shark with no cyclone.
You should do the NV352 vs the riccar. I want to see the actual agitation that both of them have.
The vertex and Nv352 both have great airflow and agitation so I see them cleaning carpets very well.
I thought so too before I deepclean tested my vertex
@@pepperpaws5276how much did you get with the vertex?
Good test
Nice comparison
Thank you! We are buying an Apex.
Awesome! All 3 of these vacuums are amazing and my personal pick in the vertex since it cleans a little better and has a few more bells and whistles. But the apex is an amazing choice that I still use all the time
They all did better then Kirby haha I think the nv352 had the best agitation đź
How do you compare the Apex to the Stratos? I find the apex appealing for easy access to the brush rolls but Stratos seems to be cheaper right now than Apex.
The stratos is better than the vertex when it comes to cleaning. The apex was truthfully never that great at carpets, but the stratos is much much better. It also has a much better bin system, as well as anti tangle brush roll. Not having access to the brushroll has not been a problem for me personally, and I havenât seen complaints online. I personally prefer the vertex over both because I think itâs balanced better and is the easiest to maneuver. But it is extremely similar to the stratos. Overall, itâs better than the apex in just about every way. Other than the little light on the handle, I do miss that.
Great video I was wondering your opinion on other reviews Iâve seen which bash shark vacuums claiming theyâre false advertising. I wanted to purchase of one their vacuums but I was looking for other reviews
A lot of people do like to bash shark and say their stuff is terrible and false advertising. The 100% truth is they are great machines that work really well for their price. The people that say they are horrible own $800 vacuums. Not everyone can afford that. And in my tests, sharks have done better than the expensive machines. So for the price they are great. And as long as you wash the filter and do maintenance on them. They will last a decent amount of time. Average life of a shark is about 7 years. But I own one that Iâve had for 10 years and itâs still going strong.
@@DillonCleans thanks your your reply, I was in doubt because I recently came across this YT channel named âPerformance Reviewsâ that seems to have a strong dislike for Sharkâs products. He showed its performance as being very lackluster, leaving behind large amounts of debris compared to bagged vacuums which he claims are significantly better. His tests all demonstrated the sharks with minimal suction power, although they did come off as biased and unfair. This is why I questioned the authenticity of Sharks which I hoped to order.
@@imaginemyshocko1455 performance reviews is a channel run by someone who has a strong hatred for anything bagless and not Miele, sebo, or central vac. The truth is not everyone can afford them. And his âbudget picksâ in my opinion arenât good. His tests are very flawed and I have spoken to many other CZcamsrs about them. He makes sharks and Dysons and really anything bagless seem like a piece of garbage. He isnât very nice as a person himself. He is an adult who has sort of been known to throw little fits when people donât agree with him. And he even told me ( a minor ) to kill myself. And this isnât my opinion on him. These are facts on him. These are things heâs actually done and said. I donât associate myself with him in any way shape or form. I congratulate him on his knowledge, expertise, and dedication to his work as well as his videos. However, he doesnât like to admit the truth. And thatâs what some people have realized about him. And why he has a poor reputation with other collectors. Now as for shark vacuums, they are probably the best thing you can get for you buck. They work well. Have great features. Clean well. And for a good price. Wonât last 20 years like a sebo. But will work a lot better in the time that it is around.
@iMaGiNeMyShOcK /o\ I used to watch that channel and recently unsubscribed because of his bias. I debated bagged vs. Bagless, and he kept telling me basically that I was wrong. He's convincing, I'll give him that, but as a so-called professional, he doesn't have an open mind at all and pushes expensive, bagged every time. Dillon is awesome and check out Vacuum Wars also. He doesn't seem to have any bias
Shark just came out with a new upright it call the Shark Stratos upright with a new mechanism for emptying the bin and it has odor reduction technology.
Iâve heard of it and I know I would love it. I do plan on getting it however itâs nearly identical to the vertex, so unless you need that odor eliminator, the vertex would be just about as good. But I do plan on getting it in the coming months
@@DillonCleans the stratos has bristles where the the vertex has flaps . so i think shark came to the conclusion that the flaps might not agitate or hold up as long as bristles do . thats what i like about the old navigator good old school bristles and no front roller to get filthy.
@@DillonCleans as of right now if you donât have it yet and want it, the stratos is on sale for 299 instead of 429 and the current vertex is 400 instead of 499. 20% discount on apex, 30% on stratos. Putting a vaccum on my wedding registry is why Iâm looking into it now.
@@MHSMagicLuver Thank you for that info & congratulations! đŸ
@Lisa yes! It's such an awesome price! I want it soooooo badly, but I have to get rid of my Sirena first or hubby will have a fit with me đ€Ł
The NV352 for being way cheaper than the other 2 performed on Par if not better than the most expensive Vertex.
7:04 I spot the sebo
@@ajf2005 good eye đ
will you be getting a shark Stratos
Eventually yes
Which one sholud i get the vertex or the stratos?
Iâd personally go for the vertex
@@DillonCleans Could I ask why? I recently got the Stratos 40% off on Amazon for black friday. I don't want buyers remorse lol
@@sebastiankerizzle9013 I say the vertex because itâs basically the exact same vacuum but cheaper. But if you got it 40% off then thatâs great!! No reason for buyers remorse all youâre gonna love it!
@@DillonCleans awesome thanks so much for the help and videos!
My guess is the navigator would do better on carpet.
Would love to see this same test on hard floor
@@nikkibasmr this is definitely a test I will redo on hard floors!
Wow, tough to tell on video but maybe the Apex in my opinion. They all did great!
I am also super jealous u have a three. đ€Ł
@@nikkibasmr oh I got more than 3 lol! I have 10
Shark or Dyson? Which one is better?
Well. Depends on the application. For a lot of carpets and a lot of dirt, a Dyson upright would be best. For a smaller home that wants cordless, a Dyson is best. For a home with a lot of combination of flooring, a lot of furniture and needs a good cleaning no matter what it is, Shark will be much better. And shark is more affordable. I personally prefer shark. But I certainly do love Dyson. I do have a lot after all
@@DillonCleans I gotcha. I just recently got a Dyson V7 and absolutely love it.
@@porschepal7932 the v7 is definitely one of Dysons best! They are very good for being so small. I love them
@@DillonCleans Yeah I got the V7 Animal on sale for $299.
@@DillonCleans Eventually I would like to upgrade to the V15.