This was the only informative video I could find. All others kept repeating asymmetric encryption part of PGP, without actually telling how I could use it using GPG
At 12:15 you mentioned "not knowing why VMs" take longer to generate entropy on mouse movements. It's because the "mouse updates" are far less than with actual mouse hardware connected direct to a machine. To save on I/O, VMs push mouse control data at a lower rate, therefore generating less entropy when using mouse movements inside a VM.
Thank you for this! I think there's a typo In the slide from 1st minute: it says public keys are to decrypt, and private to encrypt. It's the other way around (as diagrams later show).
Very nice video. Really well done. Thank You for this great video. One request. Where is the second part of the video ? This video seems to end quite suddenly.
Is there a chance to generate the same unique key in two different computers since these keys are not compared anywhere, and would be the fingerprint the same (I'm just curious) ?
To put that in perspective, there are about a trillion (10^13) galaxies in the observable universe with, let's say a billion (10^10) stars each. Let's say that each star has a planet that has a billion computers on it, and each computer is generating a billion keys a second (that's about 10^14 keys per computer per year), and each computer ir running for the age of the universe (about 10^11 years)... that only gets us up to 10^68, so we would have about a 0.0000000001 % chance of a collision.
This was the only informative video I could find. All others kept repeating asymmetric encryption part of PGP, without actually telling how I could use it using GPG
At 12:15 you mentioned "not knowing why VMs" take longer to generate entropy on mouse movements. It's because the "mouse updates" are far less than with actual mouse hardware connected direct to a machine. To save on I/O, VMs push mouse control data at a lower rate, therefore generating less entropy when using mouse movements inside a VM.
Filling in the gaps like a pro
Thank you for this video. The training video i first followed was extremely convoluted, and didn't explain everything well. You're the man!
Outstanding Pedagogy!
Thanks for this tutorial! Simply the best tutorial on YT :)
Great video professor, really helpful.
I loved it!!
Thanks for your great explanation!!
Thank you for this!
I think there's a typo In the slide from 1st minute: it says public keys are to decrypt, and private to encrypt. It's the other way around (as diagrams later show).
Well spotted. Private key does encrypt when signing a message but I doubt that is what he intended to say.
Well done
I love you
THANK YOU !!!
amazing video!!! I can surely recommend!!!
Very nice video. Really well done. Thank You for this great video.
One request. Where is the second part of the video ? This video seems to end quite suddenly.
Thank you so much..it's very usefull
Very clear. Thank you !
Thank you!
You sound like a less comicalised version of Kermit the frog! But great video helpd out loads, thanks
cannot unhear
thanks!
Can I publish in my website the public keys?
Amazing content !!
$ man gpg
bash: man :command not found
i can't acces my gpg it can't open the port plz can u help
Can you post a video on how to encrypt using a public key?
I think the publi key is only for decryption
most any encryption will use the public key
Is there a chance to generate the same unique key in two different computers since these keys are not compared anywhere, and would be the fingerprint the same (I'm just curious) ?
Yes, but the chances of that happening are astronomically low ( < 1/10^80 iirc)
To put that in perspective, there are about a trillion (10^13) galaxies in the observable universe with, let's say a billion (10^10) stars each. Let's say that each star has a planet that has a billion computers on it, and each computer is generating a billion keys a second (that's about 10^14 keys per computer per year), and each computer ir running for the age of the universe (about 10^11 years)... that only gets us up to 10^68, so we would have about a 0.0000000001 % chance of a collision.
@@federicocergol3597 The actual odds are FAR lower. The number you quote exceeds the entropy of a PC
12:35 i guess the mouse movements weren't working jlkfjlkf
رايع يدا و الر