I was in merchant navy n told stories about sbs training drills. SAS are ones in the newspapers. SBS are ones you rarely hear about.. all uk SF are elite but SBS are unparalleled.
The UK special forces go through the same training and selection process (the hardest in the world), then if out of about 200 individuals who start the only around 8-10% pass. Then, they are branched off into different regiments such as SAS, SBS.... also the UK has the The Royal Gurkha Rifles, not to be tangled with at any cost! Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw ("Sam the brave") chief of staff of the Indian army once said "If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or he is a Gurkha." ...
@@chalky89sbs has boat troop, is all about who operates where. World is split into areas of responsibility. Also SRR and Sfsg, please educate yourself before talking.
Just listened to the full podcast. Seems there was a LOT cut out, maybe an hour or more? Also, there were some bits where you could hear John not answering Chris because didn't want to one-up him even more. Like when Chris mentions how SAS is working with maps from the 1940s while the Americans have 12 satellite maps, 24 hrs maps if you wanted analysis. Meanwhile, John is thinking, "Dude, 10-15 years ago, we could live ISR assets that could resolve license plates undetected until the moment we raid the compound. Now, our infantry platoons don't roll outside the wire without assets to provide top cover."
I simply have to disagree. The fact of the matter is that American Special Forces have shown that they are the best in the world. American SF have killed more high value targets than the British, New Zealanders, and the Australians combined. Also, take into account that the Americans have rescued more hostages than the aforementioned countries combined. The fact of the matter is that American SF are the best in the world. FACT.
@@markfullbrighton5070 its not what ive been shown when I’ve searched. Where did you look? Everywhere i look it shows sas one of the best if not the best. And they’ve been around since ww2 and have much more experience
@@giannister No disrespect but please tell me that you don't get paid for your input because you would have starved to death. Secondly, your research has been piss poor. The fact of the matter is that the internet is a terribly unreliable source for information. Lastly, sure the SAS have been around longer than American SF, but that is simply not an objection to anything that I have said. The fact of the matter is that American SF have killed more HVT's and rescued more hostages than many countries combined. In my view, this classifies American SF as the best in the world.
Americans are the best special forces to Americans. SAS and SBS are the best SF unit on the planet and are unbeaten. 50% if not more countries base their training on the SAS. Including Seals and Delta. Fact.
Imagine thinking these stupid pissing matches prove anything. Each unit is setup for their own specific purposes - no one is "competing" against each other.
Absolute nonsense. There is essentially no difference between these dudes except American SOF have higher budgets and therefore better equipment. American SOF have the highest number of HVTs killed/captured, and for the past 20 years it has been American SOF units that have taken down the nr 1 terrorist HVTs in the world, not British ones.
Your tiny island nation has less money, a smaller and less diverse recruiting pool, and less combat experience. Shut up, American SOF blows UKSF out of the water everyday of the week
@@johanlassen6448 bless, I know yanks think they are the best at everything but the truth is most NATO forces think Yanks are a joke. My Aussie mate got back from deployment and couldn't slag off the yanks enough for how dumb and useless they were. Aussies kept telling them to put out their cigerettes and the yanks refused " because they were Americans" and of course they constantly gave their positions away. My brother was a Para and he couldn't stand being deployed near yanks. He said there was far more chance of being killed by yank friendly fire than by the enemy. SAS and SBS look down on Yank "special" forces because they are 'special alright' Truth is, if NATO or the Yank military want an impossible mission doing, they don't send Delta. They ask for the SAS.
As far as I'm aware the SAS & SBS do the same selection at the beginning but then specialising in their own skills. I mean it can't be fun being in the water in say the North sea, wind rain extreme cold 😮 Extreme conditions not like a swimming pool 😂 Definitely not for the faint of heart. SBS & SBS are both good at their jobs. Don't think one is better than the other
Back in the day they were separate units, but now they've been amalgamated into a single entity Now you all do selection as a whole, then choose to specialise after acceptance
@@theophrastusbombastus1359 Yeah it makes sense to have both specialists in their own right. Both doing the initial selection stops the " we're better" nonsense. Had a Sgt in my Battery who was ex 29 Commando & he told me his brother was SBS. Was a good bloke.
The main selection itself (6 months) is done together. After that the SAS get badged and join their units whilst the SBS do another 2-3 months of amphibious, diving training.
Lets just say that the top SF in the world are all within shouting distance of each other, They cross train with other countries, about the only thing that really separates them is equipment...be it weapon systems, intel gathering systems etc.
@@TomGodson95 no Royal Marines are like equal to US Marine Recon and Royal Marine Commandos are like US MARSOC, even the standard Navy Seals are far above that but still not as good as SAS or SBS, Navy Seals are only the 3rd best in the US and the SAS and SBS havent proven to be better than US Delta Force and US DEVGRU
Btw the delta child like tribalism is probably the greatest weakness they have. It’s the reason the rangers are now elite standalone CQB stallions. General mccrystal wanted to make an example out of why you don’t hoard time sensitive targets and not be a team player. - but It turns out SAS went for 2 weeks then went home. The legit reasoning was: THE COMMANDER OF 22 SAS WANTED TO SAVE THEM for IRAQ #2 in THE event UK WAS ATTACKED. BECAUSE SAS operate in the uk. The job of a tier one team is hostage rescue. Normally you use 82nd/10th mountain/ 101st/ Green Berets/ Tier 2 Units. Let’s face it. Tier 1 units can’t survive with out CAS. So it’s a weakness of small units. I don’t think the commander’s decision was wrong. He needed to keep a HR capability for the Uk in the event osama or somebody attacked somewhere and took hostages.
There would be no delta force without the sas . Delta was built on what it's founder had seen from the SAS.. unlike the yanks us brits didn't shoot anything that moved or bomb anything that wasn't already bombed
I love all the butt-hurt comments even though none of them have any skin in the game. It's like arguing about who's dad can beat up another guys dad. They all talk crap but fight next to each other in the end. Chill out!
It's so damn annoying, randos wanting to ride coattails of their country's special forces, as if these units are all competing against each other like a sports league or something.
@@UserName-om6ft they most certainly are. The whole SF ideal is built from the SAS and SBS. Ask 90% of US SF that served with UKSF and they’ll tell you how good they are.
@@Danaddison1 not even close, your own SAS commanders admit that the US Delta Force is better, SAS and SBS has never proven to be better than Delta or DEVGRU
@@UserName-om6ft There can never be a direct comparison, but UKSF selection is known to be tougher then the American. I mean, US seal selection/training is equivalent to British Marine basic training etc. And I’d like to see where SBS and SAS commanders said Delta are better.
@@Danaddison1 how is seal training equal to British marine training? i havent heard something so brainIess in my entire life, even US MARSOC and US Marine Recon has longer and harder trainings than Royal Marines, let alone the Seals even your own SAS commander Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams prefers the Delta over his own SAS soldiers, and i quote directly "A common thread runs throughout Task Force Black that makes it difficult not to come away with the impression that the units’ relationship has since evolved. Today they seem to exist almost like siblings, with Delta - backed by the enormous might and budget of the United States military machine (and JSOC in particular) - playing big brother to the SAS’s little brother. Besides merely wanting in on some of Delta’s action, the SAS’s commanding officer at the time, Lt. Col. Richard Williams, openly admired General McChrystal and was described as an unabashed Americanophile, SAS Commander Lt. Col. Richard Williams stated he would have preferred to have commanded Delta than his own men. He constantly challenged Task Force Black (mockingly referred to as “Task Force Slack” prior to their JSOC integration) to match the pace and intensity of the Americans. And when the SAS was at its most lethal, Urban described it as “operating in the style of Delta.” The units’ assaulters even began to look more and more alike. The SAS is described as transitioning to the practice of wearing their sidearms on the front of their body armor in a similar fashion to the Americans rather than in leg holsters as they typically had previously while also adopting the same Crye Precision MultiCam camouflage gear that was popular with Delta operators - some even complete with Stars and Stripes-adorned ‘Fuck al-Qaeda’ patches even SAS admits that Delta is better "we the SAS have been surpassed by the Delta as the best special forces on the planet" even your own British journalist Mark Urban covers the entire subject
Duncan Falconer explained it well. Pre GWOT, SBS was always looked down upon by SAS. They didn’t have a chance to prove themselves, they didn’t receive nearly the same amount of funding. Now however that doesn’t matter, the SBS are as good at the SAS and even better at maritime ops
The main difference I see, is that when the SAS go in; EVERY terrorist dies and EVERY hostage lives. When I hear about Yank special forces, it always seems to be: mostly everyone dies.
Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.
thats hilarious, in 2015 the Delta Force conducted the biggest hostage rescue near Hawija in Iraq where the Delta Force rescued 70 hostages, where is the SAS with these kinds of numbers? in operation Abalone in 2003 the US Delta Force and British SAS were sent to four compounds in Ramadi to search for a Sudanese jihadist, the Delta Force effectively cleared their two compounds without any issues, however the SAS failed in their last building as they suffered several casualties in which the US Delta Force had to come in and clear the compounds themselves due to SAS failures
@@UserName-om6ft US: joke. They label a force AFTER they've made the acronym up, SWAT, DELTA FORCE. And our forces ALWAYS know where Yanks are; behind, and a bigger risk than the enemy in front. Standing joke. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
we was nicked named sandbag company as we had a captain that was 23y and volunteered us for everything if you wanted a shit sandwich with egg we made it loool was 6 of us sent out with 50 afgan army to find the forward line of enemy forces 2 weeks before panthers claw was told yer there only 200 Taliban in there was 550 Taliban killed in the first day of the op loool was more like 3000 in there lairs pmsfl we was dropping two motor lines fire 3 rounds drop 50 meters fire 3 rounds drop 50 meters until we got out was the fastest iv ran in my life loool
Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.
@@markfullbrighton5070yeah right 😂 the SAS have been actively involved in every war to date. Every USSF will tell you that the brits SF are better, Wether they like to admit it or not!
@@markfullbrighton5070and i would like to just remind you that the SBS had osama bin laden in there sights and could have taken him out but high command wouldn’t allow it because the Americans wanted to be the one’s who took him out 😂😂 crying like big baby’s they are lol American military has got nothing on UK military man for man, just more money but money doesn’t buy experience something that the US lacks 😂😂😂😂
@@robocop3961 No disrespect, but you are not very informed on the matter, are you? Firstly, I acknowledge that the British SAS and SBS have been around longer, but in my view, they have been surpassed by American Special Forces. In the recent decades, American Special Forces have taken out more high value targets and hostage rescues than the British and Australians combined. Secondly, even some of your own soldiers have acknowledged that the SAS has been surpassed by Delta Force. Lastly, there was a British officer that worked with American Special Forces, and he said the Americans were so good that he wished he was in command of them rather than his own British unit.
Love to hear these Special Mission Unit Vets reminisce. 👍🏻
Never been in the Army in my life but I grew up on Chris Ryans book. The absolute greatest.
Chris, love these interviews/ podcasts! You should put the full videos on CZcams. They would be v popular.
Its probably better to put the full podcast here on youtube fascial expressions make a story much better.
Don't disrespect sbs
@@paulda4615 This is advice abut a podcast...not sure what you're talking about.
@@snakeeyes007 lmfao ikr
dont disrespect the pizza parlah
I was in merchant navy n told stories about sbs training drills. SAS are ones in the newspapers. SBS are ones you rarely hear about.. all uk SF are elite but SBS are unparalleled.
Exactly the same selection both do same Ops , one does diving (SBS) they both parachute.
The UK special forces go through the same training and selection process (the hardest in the world), then if out of about 200 individuals who start the only around 8-10% pass. Then, they are branched off into different regiments such as SAS, SBS.... also the UK has the The Royal Gurkha Rifles, not to be tangled with at any cost! Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw ("Sam the brave") chief of staff of the Indian army once said "If a man says he is not afraid of dying, he is either lying or he is a Gurkha." ...
@@chalky89sbs has boat troop, is all about who operates where. World is split into areas of responsibility. Also SRR and Sfsg, please educate yourself before talking.
Just listened to the full podcast. Seems there was a LOT cut out, maybe an hour or more?
Also, there were some bits where you could hear John not answering Chris because didn't want to one-up him even more. Like when Chris mentions how SAS is working with maps from the 1940s while the Americans have 12 satellite maps, 24 hrs maps if you wanted analysis. Meanwhile, John is thinking, "Dude, 10-15 years ago, we could live ISR assets that could resolve license plates undetected until the moment we raid the compound. Now, our infantry platoons don't roll outside the wire without assets to provide top cover."
Yeah….now watch McPhee in his own fucking video on Tora Bora and why you don’t rely on technology. UKSF train that way for a reason you muppet.
Love Shrek. He’s stories are the best🇺🇸🇺🇸🤘🏻🤘🏻
Is the full video online somewhere? Apart from these short clips all I can find is audio versions.
Stirling's men all the way
Delta force just has the better toys, sas still said to be the best with greatest success rate in their missions.
Robert Nairac disagrees with you
@@apintofbeer1667 it’s what it says when I look it up
I simply have to disagree. The fact of the matter is that American Special Forces have shown that they are the best in the world. American SF have killed more high value targets than the British, New Zealanders, and the Australians combined. Also, take into account that the Americans have rescued more hostages than the aforementioned countries combined. The fact of the matter is that American SF are the best in the world. FACT.
@@markfullbrighton5070 its not what ive been shown when I’ve searched. Where did you look? Everywhere i look it shows sas one of the best if not the best.
And they’ve been around since ww2 and have much more experience
@@giannister No disrespect but please tell me that you don't get paid for your input because you would have starved to death. Secondly, your research has been piss poor. The fact of the matter is that the internet is a terribly unreliable source for information. Lastly, sure the SAS have been around longer than American SF, but that is simply not an objection to anything that I have said. The fact of the matter is that American SF have killed more HVT's and rescued more hostages than many countries combined. In my view, this classifies American SF as the best in the world.
Americans are the best special forces to Americans. SAS and SBS are the best SF unit on the planet and are unbeaten. 50% if not more countries base their training on the SAS. Including Seals and Delta. Fact.
Imagine thinking these stupid pissing matches prove anything. Each unit is setup for their own specific purposes - no one is "competing" against each other.
Absolute nonsense.
There is essentially no difference between these dudes except American SOF have higher budgets and therefore better equipment. American SOF have the highest number of HVTs killed/captured, and for the past 20 years it has been American SOF units that have taken down the nr 1 terrorist HVTs in the world, not British ones.
Your tiny island nation has less money, a smaller and less diverse recruiting pool, and less combat experience. Shut up, American SOF blows UKSF out of the water everyday of the week
😆US has far more talent to pick from
SBS the shakey boat service 🤪.
It’s actually Special Bus Service
Bell end
I dont think SAS or SBS think themseleves as Tier one units....their just cut above the rest.
They KNOW they are
How do I find the whole video to this or podcast? I'd love to listen or watch them
SBS are Dev Group equivalent, ! SAS are equivalent to Delta the Unit
No. The SAS are far above Delta and the SBS are way about Dev Group.
@@CMOT101 LOL, no.
@@johanlassen6448 bless, I know yanks think they are the best at everything but the truth is most NATO forces think Yanks are a joke. My Aussie mate got back from deployment and couldn't slag off the yanks enough for how dumb and useless they were. Aussies kept telling them to put out their cigerettes and the yanks refused " because they were Americans" and of course they constantly gave their positions away.
My brother was a Para and he couldn't stand being deployed near yanks. He said there was far more chance of being killed by yank friendly fire than by the enemy.
SAS and SBS look down on Yank "special" forces because they are 'special alright'
Truth is, if NATO or the Yank military want an impossible mission doing, they don't send Delta. They ask for the SAS.
@@CMOT101 Except that literally never happened.
@@johanlassen6448 it all did. Yanks are utter shit. You've only got numbers going for you.
The fact that he didn't know who the SBS was say's a lot.
There are a few things that are certain in life: Death, taxes, and Shrek shitting on the SEALS whenever given the opportunity.
Agreed sbs tier 1 from an ex para reg
" ex para reg " ...who cares knobber
As far as I'm aware the SAS & SBS do the same selection at the beginning but then specialising in their own skills.
I mean it can't be fun being in the water in say the North sea, wind rain extreme cold 😮
Extreme conditions not like a swimming pool 😂
Definitely not for the faint of heart.
SBS & SBS are both good at their jobs.
Don't think one is better than the other
Back in the day they were separate units, but now they've been amalgamated into a single entity
Now you all do selection as a whole, then choose to specialise after acceptance
@@theophrastusbombastus1359
Yeah it makes sense to have both specialists in their own right.
Both doing the initial selection stops the " we're better" nonsense.
Had a Sgt in my Battery who was ex 29 Commando & he told me his brother was SBS. Was a good bloke.
The main selection itself (6 months) is done together. After that the SAS get badged and join their units whilst the SBS do another 2-3 months of amphibious, diving training.
SAS and SBS are way above the Seals and Delta… every decorated US vet will agree.
Lets just say that the top SF in the world are all within shouting distance of each other, They cross train with other countries, about the only thing that really separates them is equipment...be it weapon systems, intel gathering systems etc.
The SBS where probably thinking who the fcuk arebthese guys.Are these this unit that was based off of usbin one way or another.
Think it’s more like navy seals like sbs
Not at all. Completely different lineages. Converging evolution, Shrek didn't mispeak.
Nope, the SB are way above your Seals. Tier one units.
Seals probably on the same level as royal marines
US Navy Seals are only the 3rd best in the US, the SBS and SAS has never proven to be better than the US Delta Force and US DEVGRU
@@TomGodson95 no Royal Marines are like equal to US Marine Recon and Royal Marine Commandos are like US MARSOC, even the standard Navy Seals are far above that but still not as good as SAS or SBS, Navy Seals are only the 3rd best in the US and the SAS and SBS havent proven to be better than US Delta Force and US DEVGRU
@@UserName-om6ft you all sound like a 14 year old in a " my dad is tougher then your dad fight".. it's pathetic.
@@RANDO4743 try crying more kid
Nothing and nobody is above our SAS and SBS. They teach others how to fight.😊
Btw the delta child like tribalism is probably the greatest weakness they have. It’s the reason the rangers are now elite standalone CQB stallions. General mccrystal wanted to make an example out of why you don’t hoard time sensitive targets and not be a team player. - but It turns out SAS went for 2 weeks then went home. The legit reasoning was: THE COMMANDER OF 22 SAS WANTED TO SAVE THEM for IRAQ #2 in THE event UK WAS ATTACKED. BECAUSE SAS operate in the uk. The job of a tier one team is hostage rescue. Normally you use 82nd/10th mountain/ 101st/ Green Berets/ Tier 2 Units. Let’s face it. Tier 1 units can’t survive with out CAS. So it’s a weakness of small units. I don’t think the commander’s decision was wrong. He needed to keep a HR capability for the Uk in the event osama or somebody attacked somewhere and took hostages.
There would be no delta force without the sas . Delta was built on what it's founder had seen from the SAS.. unlike the yanks us brits didn't shoot anything that moved or bomb anything that wasn't already bombed
I love all the butt-hurt comments even though none of them have any skin in the game. It's like arguing about who's dad can beat up another guys dad. They all talk crap but fight next to each other in the end. Chill out!
It's so damn annoying, randos wanting to ride coattails of their country's special forces, as if these units are all competing against each other like a sports league or something.
SBS Better looking taller and more humorous
LOL!
Don't forget the SAS and SBS taught the delta force and green team how to get the job done.
never happened, and SAS and SBS arent better than Delta or DEVGRU
@@UserName-om6ft they most certainly are. The whole SF ideal is built from the SAS and SBS. Ask 90% of US SF that served with UKSF and they’ll tell you how good they are.
@@Danaddison1 not even close, your own SAS commanders admit that the US Delta Force is better, SAS and SBS has never proven to be better than Delta or DEVGRU
@@UserName-om6ft There can never be a direct comparison, but UKSF selection is known to be tougher then the American. I mean, US seal selection/training is equivalent to British Marine basic training etc. And I’d like to see where SBS and SAS commanders said Delta are better.
@@Danaddison1 how is seal training equal to British marine training? i havent heard something so brainIess in my entire life, even US MARSOC and US Marine Recon has longer and harder trainings than Royal Marines, let alone the Seals
even your own SAS commander Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams prefers the Delta over his own SAS soldiers, and i quote directly "A common thread runs throughout Task Force Black that makes it difficult not to come away with the impression that the units’ relationship has since evolved. Today they seem to exist almost like siblings, with Delta - backed by the enormous might and budget of the United States military machine (and JSOC in particular) - playing big brother to the SAS’s little brother.
Besides merely wanting in on some of Delta’s action, the SAS’s commanding officer at the time, Lt. Col. Richard Williams, openly admired General McChrystal and was described as an unabashed Americanophile, SAS Commander Lt. Col. Richard Williams stated he would have preferred to have commanded Delta than his own men. He constantly challenged Task Force Black (mockingly referred to as “Task Force Slack” prior to their JSOC integration) to match the pace and intensity of the Americans. And when the SAS was at its most lethal, Urban described it as “operating in the style of Delta.”
The units’ assaulters even began to look more and more alike. The SAS is described as transitioning to the practice of wearing their sidearms on the front of their body armor in a similar fashion to the Americans rather than in leg holsters as they typically had previously while also adopting the same Crye Precision MultiCam camouflage gear that was popular with Delta operators - some even complete with Stars and Stripes-adorned ‘Fuck al-Qaeda’ patches
even SAS admits that Delta is better "we the SAS have been surpassed by the Delta as the best special forces on the planet" even your own British journalist Mark Urban covers the entire subject
Chris looks down on the SBS
Duncan Falconer explained it well. Pre GWOT, SBS was always looked down upon by SAS. They didn’t have a chance to prove themselves, they didn’t receive nearly the same amount of funding. Now however that doesn’t matter, the SBS are as good at the SAS and even better at maritime ops
@@rp4712 SAS has its own amphibious squadron which is great but SBS will win in that department.
@@boxerwayne6660 I know, boat troop
God there's something wrong with the Americans on these CZcams comment sections regarding SF, they're deluded and so fucked up 😂
Id put money on he doesn't 😉
The main difference I see, is that when the SAS go in; EVERY terrorist dies and EVERY hostage lives. When I hear about Yank special forces, it always seems to be: mostly everyone dies.
LOL American JSOC has rescued more more hostages in the past 2 decades then Uk, Aussie, NZ and
Canada SF (combined)
Thats Russian special forces.
Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.
thats hilarious, in 2015 the Delta Force conducted the biggest hostage rescue near Hawija in Iraq where the Delta Force rescued 70 hostages, where is the SAS with these kinds of numbers? in operation Abalone in 2003 the US Delta Force and British SAS were sent to four compounds in Ramadi to search for a Sudanese jihadist, the Delta Force effectively cleared their two compounds without any issues, however the SAS failed in their last building as they suffered several casualties in which the US Delta Force had to come in and clear the compounds themselves due to SAS failures
@@UserName-om6ft US: joke. They label a force AFTER they've made the acronym up, SWAT, DELTA FORCE. And our forces ALWAYS know where Yanks are; behind, and a bigger risk than the enemy in front. Standing joke. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not like "navy seals" better....
Kah3...i hate seals...
Did they steal your 🐟
we was nicked named sandbag company as we had a captain that was 23y and volunteered us for everything if you wanted a shit sandwich with egg we made it loool was 6 of us sent out with 50 afgan army to find the forward line of enemy forces 2 weeks before panthers claw was told yer there only 200 Taliban in there was 550 Taliban killed in the first day of the op loool was more like 3000 in there lairs pmsfl we was dropping two motor lines fire 3 rounds drop 50 meters fire 3 rounds drop 50 meters until we got out was the fastest iv ran in my life loool
Dude is a hater of seals and everyone else
LIke navy seals LOL
Lol yanks have no idea.
The Seals and Delta are girl scouts in comparison to the SAS
Please don't embarrass yourself again. I would actually say Delta Force and ST6 are superior to the SAS. If you look at which units have taken out more high value targets in the last couple of decades, Delta Force and ST6 are miles ahead. In fact, it was either Delta or ST6 that rescued a bunch of British hostages and David Cameron actually thanked them, so stay in your lane boys.
@@markfullbrighton5070yeah right 😂 the SAS have been actively involved in every war to date. Every USSF will tell you that the brits SF are better, Wether they like to admit it or not!
@@markfullbrighton5070and i would like to just remind you that the SBS had osama bin laden in there sights and could have taken him out but high command wouldn’t allow it because the Americans wanted to be the one’s who took him out 😂😂 crying like big baby’s they are lol American military has got nothing on UK military man for man, just more money but money doesn’t buy experience something that the US lacks 😂😂😂😂
@@robocop3961 No disrespect, but you are not very informed on the matter, are you? Firstly, I acknowledge that the British SAS and SBS have been around longer, but in my view, they have been surpassed by American Special Forces. In the recent decades, American Special Forces have taken out more high value targets and hostage rescues than the British and Australians combined. Secondly, even some of your own soldiers have acknowledged that the SAS has been surpassed by Delta Force. Lastly, there was a British officer that worked with American Special Forces, and he said the Americans were so good that he wished he was in command of them rather than his own British unit.
@@markfullbrighton5070 as you say ‘in your view’ 😁👍🏼
Sbs more like delta
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANG