We start 2023 with a educational video expelling the rhetoric of the two new bootlickers who are rushing to defend their holy grail. #brohajji #salafi #khurooj
Great presentation… big respect, keep putting them to task for their newly innovated interpretations… their arguments are surface level, their positions are minority and their narrative is entirely state funded… Allahumma Barik
Mashallah bro hajji the way your educating the youth, from pseudo salafism and highlighting their distortions and manipulations is what really makes me watch your videos, btw I have nothing against Salafis
İmam Nawawi is the student of ibn Malik the master Arabic grammarian and linguist who wrote the alfiyyah from ibn Hijab's Kaafiyah. If İmam Nawawi didn't understand Arabic, then none of these peeps especially the current claimants know nothing of the language. Well done Hajji.
What is the greater evil? 1.A leader who opress the Muslim and the scholars. The Schools teaches the children immortality and liberalism. 2.Or to die by going against this ruler.
The Arabic term Tāghūt (الطَّاغُوت) can refer to idols, a tyrant, an oracle or an enemy of Muhammad sm The term Taghut occurs eight times in the Qur’an. Tāghūt means “one who has crossed the limits”, in plain language: a rebel. It is any power or being that rebels against Allah and demands loyalty and obedience. The Arabic word Taghut is derived from the root ط-غ-ت which denotes to cross the limits, overstep boundaries; to rebel. This explains the meaning of one who exceeds the limit. This notion is associated with the three stages of disbelief in the Islamic context: disobeying Allah, kufr (rejection of the idea that one should obey Allah) and - the last stage - which is: not only to rebel against Allah but also imposing their rebellion against the will of Allah upon others. People who reach this stage are considered a taghut. In a broader sense, it stands for everything that may direct a Muslim into evil things. In Arabic, it can be interpreted as singular or plural. Therefore, it is commonly translated as the powers of evil. This expression was used in Tunisia recently by Moncef Marzouki, a Tunisian politician who was the president of Tunisia from 2011 to 2014. He defamed his rival party Nidaa Tounes (نِداء تُونِس) by this term and caused a lot of criticism. The term is mentioned in the Qur’an, for example in sura 2 The Cow - in Arabic: al-Baqara (سُورة الْبَقَرة); or in sura 4 Women - in Arabic: al-Nisā’ (سُورة النِّساء) - verse 4:60: أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنزِلَ مِن قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَن يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَن يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا. Meaning: Do you [Prophet] not see those who claim to believe in what has been sent down to you, and in what was sent down before you, yet still want to turn to unjust tyrants for judgement, although they have been ordered to reject them? Satan wants to lead them far astray.
On top of all that the scholars when they say muslim rulers they mean actual Muslim rulers😂 not ones who are on kufr 24 hours of the day, puppets and robbing the peoples money and ones that can’t even read a verse of the Quran properly
I love the way they say that you should advise the ruler by meeting them and in private. So this would infer that today's rulers meet the ummah or hold court as they did in the past but that is not the case. So therefore this will never happen as they lock themselves away in their grand palaces away from the general public. Almost all of these rulers are in their position because they were enforced into position by kuffar rulers and they have alliances with the kuffar to subjugate the public and keep themselves in their positions and increase munkar within society. This in itself at the very least brings their rule to be illegitimate. By their own definition these rulers are kharijis themselves. For example look at how the Saud Family were installed into their position.
Imam bin Baz, lol. I only use title of Imam for the unparalleled Aimah (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them), not somone random in today's day and age. Also, impressed you're quoting Allamah al ayni (rahimahullah).
NOTE: We all agree that we should not bring division among Muslims but can we with Munafiquns? >>Islam is a Complete way of Life - Wholistic approach to Human Life - affairs. Q: Why "Boycott" hurts particularl 'Group' of A'lims (Mathkhalis - Boot-Licking Approaches) as they never take any effective Step / Role to address Ongoing Muslim or Islamic Serious Issues but throwing Fatwa (Prohibition) if anyone anywhere take any action even though which is not clearly against Islam rather to favor.. Have anyone noticing any evidential Objection from "Mathkhalis" regarding "Hallowin" (100%) Pagam Ritual introducing in Saudi-Arabia and Obscene Women Music / Dance Concert?? Seems Mathkhalis also following 100% of Bible's Distorted Law: "Give the King / Ruler what is his due and Give God what is God's due (Separation of State and Religion) which Jewish scholars Rejects as God's Rule but corrupted one. Q: Why at this moment when the Whole World is affected by the atrocities in Palestine in order to Oppose the Oppressor many Muslims considering to "Boycott" as an Indirect Action? 1. Out of 57 Muslim Countries which or how many countries have True Muslim Governments7 (whom should we obey from 100% Islamic perspective} 2. Many many Millions of Muslims we live in Non-Muslim Countries across the World: Almost majority Non-Muslim countries are against Majority Muslim Countries including Saudi-Arab since they believe Muslims are below the level of Humans or so. If Muslims to get permission to decide to Boycott from Muslim Government how many decades to wait if at all possible? FYI: a) Is it not within Islam that to Speak (take stand} against Unjust Ruler is the Highest Level of Jihad? b) 'If you have power prevent Evil with your hand or with your words or hate it in your heart (this is the lowest level of Iman). -Prophet Mohammad (SAW) mentioned according to Hadith). In which Islamic Source has exactly mentioned about "Boycott" is Haram ? If is there any why this A'lim did not mentioned as Rock Solid Reference since he is very very Knowledgeable abbot Islam?
Sallam bro, appreciate the academic response. I think what would greatly benefit your channel and the viewers is to structure your videos better. Please accept this advice. Right now it can get a bit overwhelming and can feel like information overload. Maybe start with a clearer introduction, some dotted points on screen would be a massive help. Then split the video into different chapters, starting each with a summary of claim, refutation and evidences. Barak Allah feek.
barakaLlahoufik brother!! great distortion going on with Shahid Bolsen with his channel Middle Nation. I don't know if you know his channel but he's pushing forward normalization with Is(not)real, not caring about the khilafah, seeking power by the governments through means that contradict principles of the chariah. At some point I started doubting his intentions but now it becomes clearer. He's madkhali views even if he is wearing a suit
Thank you and alhamdullilah another person has noticed this. This Shahid Bolsen is dangerous and people should stay away from his channel. He is all about achieving Dunya by any means. Never heard him say that Muslim governments should stay away from Riba based economies.
Bro Hajji, the evidence you bring is enough to show their mistakes and lies. You don't have to name call (deragotory name) a muslim as that falls under clear prohibition. As your brother in faith, I remind you to fear Allah and to behave justly with those you disagree with (even though many madkhalis transgress and are unjust).
Serious questions: Is a ruler who is nominally Muslim-he publicly proclaims the 2 shahadas-but drops 10 atomic bombs for no reason on 10 cities of the Muslims that he rules, still a Muslim? Is not his invalidation of the laws against murder-essentially, proclaiming that they do not apply to him or his minions-a denial of a clear commandment of the religion and therefore “kufr bawaah”? Is it not clear indication that such a ruler doesn’t fear Allah because he doesn’t believe that any sort of punishment awaits him in the hereafter? Is he not the same as someone who nominally proclaims the 2 shahadas but then turns around and says that the Noble Qur’an is corrupted or that zakaat no longer needs to be paid because it’s not a binding pillar of religion? Does “kufr bawaah” have to be “kufr yakhrij min al millah” including uttering an overt kalima or shahada of kufr proclaiming a false deity? If scholars of Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah say that a person who abandons the fardh of salaat out of mere laziness (without that person disputing that salaat is indeed a fardh) is outside the fold of Islam, then isn’t a ruler who repeatedly commits or orders the committing of premeditated murder even more blameworthy than the person who abandons salaat out of laziness? Did the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) ever make Muslim rulers exempt from the prohibition against premeditated murder? If there are some authentic hadiths where the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) commanded the believers to be patient if and when unjust rulers demand their rights of rulership from their subjects, but in turn, the rulers don’t uphold the rights of their subjects, are there any authentic hadiths where the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) exempted rulers from upholding the rights of Allah, and commanded the believers to obey unjust rulers who don’t uphold the rights of Allah? Was Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in error when he said that bughaat against the ruler-given a proper taa’weel-can in fact be considered ahl-haqq if the unjust ruler (“hakim jaa’ir”) doesn’t satisfy their just grievances?
Killing a Muslim is a major sin…not disbelief. How do you not know that? It’s honestly scary how you ignorantly try to equate that with kufr billah. Someone persisting on a sin does NOT mean he deems it to be halal or as you said ‘essentially proclaiming that they don’t apply to him.’ This is absolute ignorance that could lead someone to begin labelling Muslims kuffar. There’s a difference between someone persistently committing a sin and someone deeming it to be halal, which you didn’t even make clear in your weird question. الله المستعان
Salam Alaykum akhi from my limited knowledge the difference between abandoning salah and mass murder is that Salah is what differentiates us from the kuffar as per the many narrations of the prophet (SAW). Murder though wrong is a sin which can be forgiven by repentance to Allah as per the Hadith of the man that killed 100 people.
To add Imam nawawi in his explanation of the story of the man that killed 100 said that if one kills intentionally and believes it is permissible to do so then that is when they are out of the fold of Islam but if they know it is impermissible then they are an evil-doer
Have you noticed many people resemble each other from the Muslim groups due to being regimented to look like their leadership and peers Inclusion is a hell of a drug Remember the above statement you’re gonna hear it a lot
Assalamualaikum jazakullahuhyr haven't listened to all of your vids but loved everything I have gone through thus far allahumabarik, editing could do with a bit more professional tuning inshaAllah. Ustadh is regards to your comments about Abu Taymiyyah maybe you are going on his apparent phone call and you have hopes for him and that's good from your part. I'm guessing he contacted you most likely after the fitnah he caused for ustadh Daniel. We hope that tammy returns to the truth but at the moment Abu Taymiyyah (tammy) works like a snake from the shadows. He will travel distance to privately warn people of mufti muneer and others that may threaten Tammy's popularity or from the shadows he will make it look like he is in dialogue and when he sits with others he will say what they want to hear. if he suspects you to be having jihadi tendencies he will find a tammy friendly person in your circle to spy on you. Most likely he is terrified that you will make a vid on him and that will be the downfall of his popularity
@@BroHajji I would assume it was a phew of relief lol, because you have dismantled his argument very effectively, The problem is Haqqan is taking "Eeenda" and making it absolute which he has no basis to do so. It says (أفضل الجهاد) it became the best form of Jihad because the inkaar was done in the presence of ruler and that's a huge risk since the ruler can imprison you, kill you or harm you in anyway (why not, we are talking about a tyrant ruler for God's sake). Whosoever does the inkaar despite of these dangers has real guts and strong Eemaan. That's why it became the best form of Jihad. That's the reality of "Eeenda" in this hadeeth as many other shurraah has stated. Haqqan's interpretation is very much farfetched. Even if for the sake of argument if we allow his interpretation, even then that is not set in stone, it's a matter of Ijthihaad and should not be made a basis upon which deviancy is measured against.
According to the hanbali madhab, a face on its own is not considered an animate image as it would not be living on its own, an animate image is considered a face along with a torso wallahu allam
kalaam from scholars is ishtihaad they make it could be wrong it could be good but hadith and kalaam of the companians go first not kalaam of scholars the salaf
you should not learn ilm from books without a scholar then your making your own fatawas and refute brothers who follow ilm from scholars i think your very wrong akhi
Your thumbnail is misleading, Why are you making fun of brother Muhammad James Sutton akhi he is NOT a bootlicker. he is one who loves Allah swt and his messenger
@Abu Sayid Miah so does referring him as a bootlicker make him any better ??? Fear Allah swt remember he is not our enemy, also he was just making points to a serious matter, you know brother people will just look at the thumbnail and make there judgement without context
Great presentation… big respect, keep putting them to task for their newly innovated interpretations… their arguments are surface level, their positions are minority and their narrative is entirely state funded… Allahumma Barik
Mashaa Allah, Allahumma barik bro hajji. This video presented an perfect evidence on itself, Salam from Philippines 🇵🇭.
Mashallah bro hajji the way your educating the youth, from pseudo salafism and highlighting their distortions and manipulations is what really makes me watch your videos, btw I have nothing against Salafis
İmam Nawawi is the student of ibn Malik the master Arabic grammarian and linguist who wrote the alfiyyah from ibn Hijab's Kaafiyah. If İmam Nawawi didn't understand Arabic, then none of these peeps especially the current claimants know nothing of the language.
Well done Hajji.
What is the greater evil?
1.A leader who opress the Muslim and the scholars. The Schools teaches the children immortality and liberalism.
2.Or to die by going against this ruler.
I have nothing to add or ask, other than to say, I love your Green Thobe Brother! Also Jazakallahir!
Masha Allah excellent response.
Excellent video
The Arabic term Tāghūt (الطَّاغُوت) can refer to idols, a tyrant, an oracle or an enemy of Muhammad sm The term Taghut occurs eight times in the Qur’an.
Tāghūt means “one who has crossed the limits”, in plain language: a rebel. It is any power or being that rebels against Allah and demands loyalty and obedience.
The Arabic word Taghut is derived from the root ط-غ-ت which denotes to cross the limits, overstep boundaries; to rebel.
This explains the meaning of one who exceeds the limit. This notion is associated with the three stages of disbelief in the Islamic context: disobeying Allah, kufr (rejection of the idea that one should obey Allah) and - the last stage - which is: not only to rebel against Allah but also imposing their rebellion against the will of Allah upon others. People who reach this stage are considered a taghut.
In a broader sense, it stands for everything that may direct a Muslim into evil things. In Arabic, it can be interpreted as singular or plural.
Therefore, it is commonly translated as the powers of evil.
This expression was used in Tunisia recently by Moncef Marzouki, a Tunisian politician who was the president of Tunisia from 2011 to 2014.
He defamed his rival party Nidaa Tounes (نِداء تُونِس) by this term and caused a lot of criticism.
The term is mentioned in the Qur’an, for example in sura 2 The Cow - in Arabic: al-Baqara (سُورة الْبَقَرة); or in sura 4 Women - in Arabic: al-Nisā’ (سُورة النِّساء) - verse 4:60:
أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا بِمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَا أُنزِلَ مِن قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوا أَن يَكْفُرُوا بِهِ وَيُرِيدُ الشَّيْطَانُ أَن يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَالًا بَعِيدًا.
Meaning: Do you [Prophet] not see those who claim to believe in what has been sent down to you, and in what was sent down before you, yet still want to turn to unjust tyrants for judgement, although they have been ordered to reject them? Satan wants to lead them far astray.
On top of all that the scholars when they say muslim rulers they mean actual Muslim rulers😂 not ones who are on kufr 24 hours of the day, puppets and robbing the peoples money and ones that can’t even read a verse of the Quran properly
I love the way they say that you should advise the ruler by meeting them and in private. So this would infer that today's rulers meet the ummah or hold court as they did in the past but that is not the case. So therefore this will never happen as they lock themselves away in their grand palaces away from the general public. Almost all of these rulers are in their position because they were enforced into position by kuffar rulers and they have alliances with the kuffar to subjugate the public and keep themselves in their positions and increase munkar within society. This in itself at the very least brings their rule to be illegitimate. By their own definition these rulers are kharijis themselves. For example look at how the Saud Family were installed into their position.
Imam bin Baz, lol. I only use title of Imam for the unparalleled Aimah (may Allah ta'ala be pleased with them), not somone random in today's day and age.
Also, impressed you're quoting Allamah al ayni (rahimahullah).
Shaykh Bin Bāz is not a "Random". He was a contemporary giant and was even praised by Deobandi Ulama
بارك الله في الأخ حجي بارك الله تابع كشف هؤلاء أحبار السوء.
Can I get the translation of the nasheed at the beginning please 😊
NOTE: We all agree that we should not bring division among Muslims but can we with Munafiquns?
>>Islam is a Complete way of Life - Wholistic approach to Human Life - affairs.
Q: Why "Boycott" hurts particularl 'Group' of A'lims (Mathkhalis - Boot-Licking Approaches) as they never take any effective Step / Role to address Ongoing Muslim or Islamic Serious Issues but throwing Fatwa (Prohibition) if anyone anywhere take any action even though which is not clearly against Islam rather to favor..
Have anyone noticing any evidential Objection from "Mathkhalis" regarding "Hallowin" (100%) Pagam Ritual introducing in Saudi-Arabia
and Obscene Women Music / Dance Concert??
Seems Mathkhalis also following 100% of Bible's Distorted Law: "Give the King / Ruler what is his due and Give God what is God's due (Separation of State and Religion) which Jewish scholars Rejects as God's Rule but corrupted one.
Q: Why at this moment when the Whole World is affected by the atrocities in Palestine
in order to Oppose the Oppressor many Muslims considering to "Boycott" as an Indirect Action?
1. Out of 57 Muslim Countries which or how many countries have True Muslim Governments7 (whom should we obey from 100% Islamic perspective}
2. Many many Millions of Muslims we live in Non-Muslim Countries across the World: Almost majority Non-Muslim countries are against Majority Muslim Countries including Saudi-Arab since they believe Muslims are below the level of Humans or so.
If Muslims to get permission to decide to Boycott from Muslim Government how many decades to wait if at all possible?
FYI:
a) Is it not within Islam that to Speak (take stand} against Unjust Ruler is the Highest Level of Jihad?
b) 'If you have power prevent Evil with your hand or with your words or hate it in your heart (this is the lowest level of Iman). -Prophet Mohammad (SAW) mentioned according to Hadith).
In which Islamic Source has exactly mentioned about "Boycott" is Haram ?
If is there any why this A'lim did not mentioned as Rock Solid Reference since he is very very Knowledgeable abbot Islam?
So you all here this boy is your imam ???? He is your guide to the religion ????? subhanAllah !!!
Sallam bro, appreciate the academic response. I think what would greatly benefit your channel and the viewers is to structure your videos better. Please accept this advice. Right now it can get a bit overwhelming and can feel like information overload. Maybe start with a clearer introduction, some dotted points on screen would be a massive help. Then split the video into different chapters, starting each with a summary of claim, refutation and evidences. Barak Allah feek.
barakaLlahoufik brother!! great distortion going on with Shahid Bolsen with his channel Middle Nation. I don't know if you know his channel but he's pushing forward normalization with Is(not)real, not caring about the khilafah, seeking power by the governments through means that contradict principles of the chariah. At some point I started doubting his intentions but now it becomes clearer. He's madkhali views even if he is wearing a suit
Thank you and alhamdullilah another person has noticed this. This Shahid Bolsen is dangerous and people should stay away from his channel. He is all about achieving Dunya by any means. Never heard him say that Muslim governments should stay away from Riba based economies.
Bro Hajji, the evidence you bring is enough to show their mistakes and lies. You don't have to name call (deragotory name) a muslim as that falls under clear prohibition. As your brother in faith, I remind you to fear Allah and to behave justly with those you disagree with (even though many madkhalis transgress and are unjust).
Serious questions:
Is a ruler who is nominally Muslim-he publicly proclaims the 2 shahadas-but drops 10 atomic bombs for no reason on 10 cities of the Muslims that he rules, still a Muslim?
Is not his invalidation of the laws against murder-essentially, proclaiming that they do not apply to him or his minions-a denial of a clear commandment of the religion and therefore “kufr bawaah”?
Is it not clear indication that such a ruler doesn’t fear Allah because he doesn’t believe that any sort of punishment awaits him in the hereafter?
Is he not the same as someone who nominally proclaims the 2 shahadas but then turns around and says that the Noble Qur’an is corrupted or that zakaat no longer needs to be paid because it’s not a binding pillar of religion?
Does “kufr bawaah” have to be “kufr yakhrij min al millah” including uttering an overt kalima or shahada of kufr proclaiming a false deity?
If scholars of Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah say that a person who abandons the fardh of salaat out of mere laziness (without that person disputing that salaat is indeed a fardh) is outside the fold of Islam, then isn’t a ruler who repeatedly commits or orders the committing of premeditated murder even more blameworthy than the person who abandons salaat out of laziness?
Did the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) ever make Muslim rulers exempt from the prohibition against premeditated murder?
If there are some authentic hadiths where the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) commanded the believers to be patient if and when unjust rulers demand their rights of rulership from their subjects, but in turn, the rulers don’t uphold the rights of their subjects, are there any authentic hadiths where the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) exempted rulers from upholding the rights of Allah, and commanded the believers to obey unjust rulers who don’t uphold the rights of Allah?
Was Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani in error when he said that bughaat against the ruler-given a proper taa’weel-can in fact be considered ahl-haqq if the unjust ruler (“hakim jaa’ir”) doesn’t satisfy their just grievances?
Exactly...
Killing a Muslim is a major sin…not disbelief. How do you not know that? It’s honestly scary how you ignorantly try to equate that with kufr billah.
Someone persisting on a sin does NOT mean he deems it to be halal or as you said ‘essentially proclaiming that they don’t apply to him.’ This is absolute ignorance that could lead someone to begin labelling Muslims kuffar. There’s a difference between someone persistently committing a sin and someone deeming it to be halal, which you didn’t even make clear in your weird question. الله المستعان
Salam Alaykum akhi from my limited knowledge the difference between abandoning salah and mass murder is that Salah is what differentiates us from the kuffar as per the many narrations of the prophet (SAW). Murder though wrong is a sin which can be forgiven by repentance to Allah as per the Hadith of the man that killed 100 people.
To add Imam nawawi in his explanation of the story of the man that killed 100 said that if one kills intentionally and believes it is permissible to do so then that is when they are out of the fold of Islam but if they know it is impermissible then they are an evil-doer
@@user-gj1ru9oe7h
Today's leaders do it in service of Western alliences
Madkhalis , They believe in some of the Scripture and disbelieve in others
Bro hajji keep going with these videos, these madkhalis and of similar groups are misguiding the Muslims
Why do all the neo salafis look the same?
Have you noticed many people resemble each other from the Muslim groups due to being regimented to look like their leadership and peers
Inclusion is a hell of a drug
Remember the above statement you’re gonna hear it a lot
Did Sheik Shuraim retire from being imam of haram since Sheik Shuraim agrees with Bro Hajji?
Assalamualaikum jazakullahuhyr haven't listened to all of your vids but loved everything I have gone through thus far allahumabarik, editing could do with a bit more professional tuning inshaAllah.
Ustadh is regards to your comments about Abu Taymiyyah maybe you are going on his apparent phone call and you have hopes for him and that's good from your part.
I'm guessing he contacted you most likely after the fitnah he caused for ustadh Daniel.
We hope that tammy returns to the truth but at the moment Abu Taymiyyah (tammy) works like a snake from the shadows.
He will travel distance to privately warn people of mufti muneer and others that may threaten Tammy's popularity or from the shadows he will make it look like he is in dialogue and when he sits with others he will say what they want to hear.
if he suspects you to be having jihadi tendencies he will find a tammy friendly person in your circle to spy on you.
Most likely he is terrified that you will make a vid on him and that will be the downfall of his popularity
may Allah guide all the misguided khawarij
Ustadh Muhammed James Sutton is definitely a knowledgable brother their May be differences
But he is definitely knowledgeable
bro jajji we want to donate to your channel to finance ads and advocate you beautifull chanel.
Finance ads? I don’t understand what you mean. Send me an email @ brohajji123@gmail.com
Eeennda! Means being close for none Arabic speakers. Bro hajji jokes aside I'm not in your camp but the arguments you put forward phew!!
Does that mean phew as in you are not content?
@@BroHajji I would assume it was a phew of relief lol, because you have dismantled his argument very effectively,
The problem is Haqqan is taking "Eeenda" and making it absolute which he has no basis to do so. It says (أفضل الجهاد) it became the best form of Jihad because the inkaar was done in the presence of ruler and that's a huge risk since the ruler can imprison you, kill you or harm you in anyway (why not, we are talking about a tyrant ruler for God's sake). Whosoever does the inkaar despite of these dangers has real guts and strong Eemaan. That's why it became the best form of Jihad. That's the reality of "Eeenda" in this hadeeth as many other shurraah has stated. Haqqan's interpretation is very much farfetched.
Even if for the sake of argument if we allow his interpretation, even then that is not set in stone, it's a matter of Ijthihaad and should not be made a basis upon which deviancy is measured against.
what is khaakham?
Hakhaam means a Rabbi in Arabic
@@MUSLIMSCORNER-xc1eu fitting description
just to clarify, is your youtube icon picture a drawing of your face brother? I hope not...but if that's the case, isn't it haram?
I think its a rendition of a picture instead of an original drawing if I'm not mistaken
Salaam brother haji about time you drop a video you have had man's waiting a month
Everything is haram to some people 🤦♂️
That hadith has a neo salafi fatwah, the true meaning of the hadith is more towards 3d images like sculputes Slas sheikh Kamali explained.
According to the hanbali madhab, a face on its own is not considered an animate image as it would not be living on its own, an animate image is considered a face along with a torso wallahu allam
kalaam from scholars is ishtihaad they make it could be wrong it could be good but hadith and kalaam of the companians go first not kalaam of scholars the salaf
you should not learn ilm from books without a scholar then your making your own fatawas and refute brothers who follow ilm from scholars i think your very wrong akhi
Your thumbnail is misleading, Why are you making fun of brother Muhammad James Sutton akhi he is NOT a bootlicker. he is one who loves Allah swt and his messenger
@Abu Sayid Miah so does referring him as a bootlicker make him any better ??? Fear Allah swt remember he is not our enemy, also he was just making points to a serious matter, you know brother people will just look at the thumbnail and make there judgement without context
Brother can anyone clarify if I'm allowed to dye my beard I have a lot off white hairs am I allowed or not
I heard you can't do black , but can use dark brown,
I have heard that if you have a young wife you can do it.
Ask a scholar. Every here is saying "I heard..."
You can apply mehndi
Yes but not black