“The China Convergence” (N. S. Lyons)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 10. 2023
  • Thoughts on the similarity, and dissimilarity, of managerial regimes in today's America and today's China, through the prism of the excellent N. S. Lyons.
    The written version of this review, first published in "The American Conservative," can be found here (www.theamericanconservative.c...) or here (theworthyhouse.com/2023/09/11...)
    We strongly encourage, in these days of censorship and deplatforming, all readers to bookmark our main site:
    www.theworthyhouse.com
    and to subscribe for email notifications of new posts. The Worthy House does not solicit donations or other support, or have ads. You can subscribe for email notifications here:
    theworthyhouse.com/subscribe-...
    Video podcasts identical to YT are also available at Odysee and at Rumble:
    odysee.com/@TheWorthyHouse
    rumble.com/c/c-1747695
    Other than at the main site, you can follow Charles here:
    / theworthyhouse
    gab.com/TheWorthyHouse
    This and all Worthy House narrations are offered with accurate closed captions (not auto-generated).
    "We Americans sense that we live in an empire of lies. We want to understand the people and systems which control our country and society. At a minimum, we want to know how and by whom we are ruled, and what that means for both the present and the future. But we can trust no source of information, because we know every channel of knowledge has been corrupted. Thus, inquiry usually ends in frustration, in obvious falsehoods peddled to us, or in esoteric conjectures which seem the more popular the more unlikely they are." . . .

Komentáře • 3

  • @gavinfoley103
    @gavinfoley103 Před 25 dny

    Excellent presentation. Thank you

  • @hg2.
    @hg2. Před 6 měsíci

    1984 2.0

  • @americameinyourmouth9964
    @americameinyourmouth9964 Před 9 měsíci

    The managerial revolution was exaggerated as the assumption was technocratic capitalism would lead to monopoly capital which has been hyperbole since the progressive era of the early 20th century. But I do fear we are moving towards bottlenecks in technological development as the relatively simpler technologies of the past that a single inventor could make in their lab or garage have been invented. Now the future break throughs in AI, Robotics, Fusion Energy ex cetera will require far more technical specialization meaning even larger teams of scientists meaning institutional domination of future breakthroughs.