Economic ideology is the new binary in Indian politics as Modi swerves Right & Rahul Left
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 02. 2021
- #NationalInterest #LeftRightPolitics
In this week's National Interest, Shekhar Gupta explains why India's new era of clear debate on economic policies - PM Modi swerving Right with his unabashed pitch for the private sector, and Rahul Gandhi moving Left by accusing the government of crony capitalism - is a good thing.
Read this week's National Interest here:theprint.in/national-interest...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connect with ThePrint
» Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/subscribe/
» Subscribe to our CZcams Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
» Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
» Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
» Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
» Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
» Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintIndia
» Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
» Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8
High quality and fair journalism needs good people to pay just a little for it. Please subscribe to ThePrint here: theprint.in/subscribe/
modern avatar of swantrata party is Lok satta party sadly nobody talks much about it, Shekhar can you do an interview with lok satta's party chief Dr. JP, please.
Modi government need to empowered small & medium enterprises financially & regulatory to become competitive to Chinese in global market so the 1% rich own 70%indian wealth to somewhere 15%rich own 70%wealth
Today people in comment section clearly divided in ecommically right & left 😁😁
There are 2 major flaws in, or say arguments against, your well known position on privatization:
1) Ownership - it's not just Adani/Ambani who would be the problems. The moneybag financiers behind them would totally run with it. Nobody would know whether the money came from CCP, or Jews, or Sheikhs. Worse, would it come via electoral bond route or Hawala or some RSS facilitated mediation? Would there be a limit to such ownership? Wouldn't there be cartelization? What's the guarantee that CCP would not own every farm of India, that Jews would not own every business of India, that Sheikhs would not make our cities their brothels, that Indian Brahmin-Baniya class (not casteist, but the class who does that) would not be their enablers? Half of Paris apartments are owned/leased by Sheikhs where they keep their model "friends".
2) People becoming robots, just an ID - for example, America is not the tall skyscrappers. It's the vast majority of poor people who are mistreated so badly day-in and day-out, at work, outside work, on the streets, by the police, in the courts, and even at homes. Because the system itself is sold out and corrupt to the core. Only those who make compromises would flourish. There would be so many "laws" against even basic things like walking on the streets, that everyone would be in violation of something, and then would be forced to go through the corrupt system. Trying to avoid it means working FOR strengthening the system. So that the sucking gets harder the next day. It is an Ajgar like Kundli (python trap) that gets tighter and tighter around you with each passing moment until the sweet release of death, which too is heavily commercialized phenomena.
Taken together, these 2 tenets of crony capitalism take you towards the even worse "caste" system, where the powerful declare themselves as higher caste, and others' lives are there just to facilitate the so-called "elite". They'd write books, make religions etc. to support their superiority claims. And their wealth/connections would be passed on to their chosen heirs. However, the same so-called elite would never go fight a war that would inevitably be brought upon by their ineptitude and corruption and power-thirst. In fact, they would be the first one to ally or make arrangements with a foreign power. Because their idea is to enjoy power at the expense of others, make "laws" and "rules" that pay for the life of the elite and serve their corrupt lifestyle. It is already happening in America, where many whites think they are higher caste and mislead the poor; whereas equally corrupt rich liberals from the left exploit the poor. Only centrists fight to keep the country going.
I am at the Center - neither right, nor left, leaning towards none. I was writing all this even in the 90's. It's just that I have lived around, read, traveled, mingled, and seen all of this playing out in real life since then. I have said it before, and I would say it again - the purpose of career or politics shouldn't be to become the elite, join the elite, or at least be accepted by the elite. The purpose of career or politics should be to destroy the elite system and make the world equal for every newborn child.
Just see Rahul Gandhi's "Ralph Luren White Polo " which is for "Rs.12000 , and he can say poor are poor because of Ambani Adani .
But I am asking "Why he is rich " ," Why he can afford Ralph Lauren not me"
Rahul Gandhi came spouting Socialism wearing Ralph Lauren Shirt worth Rs. 12000/- in the parliament ... 🤣🤣🤣😂😂
Enough Said!
Omg 😱
Imagine if he wore a 14lakh suit with his own name printed on it.
@Aryan Godara because these reforms are only for those who are Privileged. What about those who didn't get chance of good education, Good Chances of doing business?
Bhai tu kya Dhobi hai uska jo tujhe uske Shirt k brand pata hai.🤣
@Aryan Godara Ease of Doing business kya jitna Mumbai aur Delhi me hai utna hi kisi Bihar ya UP k chote se City me bhi hai? Tum sirf apne aur apne aas paas k bare me soch rahe ho q ki tum line k us taraf ho jab Line k is taraf Rahoge to tumhari bhi soch badal jayegi. Aur hum kisi k fan nahi hai q ki fan hone ka mtlb uske galat neetiyon ka bhi support karna jo Humse to nahi ho payega.
We are middle class. We are ambitious. We want only affordable healthcare and quality education. We shall create the rest.
Perfectly agreed with you, Socialist dont even believe people ability that they can do anything by them self. They feel Indian people are so uneducated and unskilled that they need govt support all the time...
Why should we pay too much tax to give MSP to rich farmers and Middle man Benefits? Middle man only wants Tax should be lowered nothing else. If govt make law on MSP it means Middle man going to pay more tax.
Dream On.
AAP promises this..
BJP just cut down education spending the very year they brought the new educational policy. Go figure.
Half of the congress party members were seen attending the Ambani wedding.
Ambani Supported Congress MP in 2019 general election.
There are no friends and foes in politics and business. Sab mile hue hain.
Ambani seeked support for South Mumbai Congress candidate milind deora before 2019 election.
You all are wrong ambani is right is at his place
Why all are u making him bjpwala and congresswla
I sincerely hope this particular divide continues. Political Economy needs divide to give voters more leverage on their future.
We need to know what macroeconomic policies we will be voting for!
@Malfunctioning Russian Troll Bot I simply said Indian voters will now have more clarity on Economic policy and it will be a great and valuable addition to the existing option of Personality of leaders and Social Policies.
@Malfunctioning Russian Troll Bot capitalism made America rich and gave every American the quality of life they have now
@@sarathkrishnak6238 don't fall for this troll. Just see his username
Word
@Malfunctioning Russian Troll Bot adjusting for purchasing power, an average american makes 8 times more than the average Indian. Poor americans how will they live in capitalism!!!
As a honest tax paying middle class citizen, I don’t want those wild ideas from Hoodas to tax us more. Happy for BJP to make their intentions very clear. Hoping they stay on course and steer the country in the right direction.
bro we need the people who back our private sector, any country is strong and prosperous because of strong private and effective private players we need 100s of Adanis and Ambanis
@@sudhanshusrivastava1969 Thank You we need more citizens like you. 💯
Yes we need 100s of Adanis and Ambanis from all parts of India not just one each from a single part of India. Capitalism works but not crony capitalism or monopoly capitalism.
@@dpashokk of course but in today time any one can get capital from banks and there is a mechanism to stop frauds.
Hooda was asking to tax more the persons who created thier wealth so far in pandemic indicating big rich houses specially Ambani's
I am sure he excluded Mid class families
If modi does Capitalism, I'll vote for modi and bjp for first time, libertarians are essentially unreported in India
@Varad I have never seen a single manifesto or party saying they will defend fundamental human rights as in freedom of speech, expression, public assembly and private property, I would be happy if atleast one party talks of it
Yes same here I am a neo liberal guy support free market, capitalism, less government intervention etc
@Varad ok one correction no political party with a significant number of MPs in parliament does 😅
@akshay pawar I really enjoy sham Sharma show, hope it rolls out into a full fledged political platform
@@shreyaskaranth8640 don't tell that to communists man, they think we are all corrupt, hence we support Capitalism
Strictly with respect to economy, we need to decide whether we want to reach China levels or Venezuela levels. Only on economic front.
Heard some repeating often we are growing faster than China, will reach 5 trillion soon, when ever asked why india is growing slow.
Not only do we need a China model of economic growth, we need to fight against the demonization of capitalism by leftists as if it'll hurt the poor. All purely socialist countries today are poor and will remain poor. All successful countries are capitalist with social safety nets.
Modi's Speech is something that I was waiting for Years
- Minimum Government, instead of Maximum Government
- Specialist Bureaucrats, instead of Generalist Bureaucrats
- Private Enterprises, instead of Government Enterprises
Would love it if india achieves Minarchist State.
@@gabbar51ngh I likes the Idea of Minarchism but I more of a fan of classical liberalism (Minarchism + basic public infrastructure like emergency services, roads, sewage & drainage systems), and in other things, Govt shouldn't poke it's nose!
@@jayg1996 neo Libralism
Both should work together bcz thr is a difference btw business n public service (eg: govt school n private school)
The 3rd point is no brainer.Disinvest but don’t disown.
Anyone noticed how Shekhar avoided saying that he is economically right in the video, as that will be now linked to BJP. Fearing that it will lead to a cancellation of him in left media gang.
He has been slammed as "Sanghi" for a quite a while in the left-liberal circles.
He said he is economically right in one of his videos recently
He supports both left and right
He has already been cancelled😂
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
He educated in western countries, he enjoys traveling extensively to abroad, he may be using branded products, but when it comes to common man in India, common man should remain poor so that common man can be subjugated for years and years.
@Redpoll result of fancy capitalist school which teaches you English at high price
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
@Redpoll maybe you Chinese should just stick only to mandarin and stop using English too 😏😏
@Sarthak Bhattacharjee Bhai English usage dekh.
Chinese hai saala ccp bot
@Redpoll yes ccp bots use English to troll other county users online to get 0.01 yuan as reward per trolling
Thanks for accepting this
I do support capitalism because it's only way to make our country economically stronger.
@@singhhardeep6852 Capitalist countries:- USA, Germany, France, Japan, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Singapore, Switzerland, Netherlands and etc..
@@singhhardeep6852with this huge suar like population
Gov can never empower all people of India ....
Don't copy Russia
@@kishanchaudhari35 Germany has free education and health.
Does India give that?
France too..
Sweden,Norway,Finland,Denmark,Iceland all do.
New Zealand too has good social schemes.
UK has NHS.
@@KshitijBhambri1 you can do that once you are more developed. Or if you have a lot of money due to oil.
@@kishanchaudhari35 and china... China is economically capitalist
I had no reason to support BJP. I think now I got one.
Rapid Infrastructure development & quick elimination & surrender of big Insurgency of northeast & naxals you can add that too
Me too. I'm super progressive socially but I won't stand for this socialist bullshit on economics
When a private enterprise fails it close its shop when a govt enterprise fails it expands .
The present govt. have bankrupted LIC and other govt. organisations do that the Adani & Ambanis can take over.
Caution: Sharp Right Ahead.
Thank You Modi Ji.
@Abhi Raj Yes, beacuse I have already read his article.
@@NikhilKalra93 Is the only thing you can do is spam all the comments?
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
My vote for the economic right. India needs it. forget growth, we need it for mere survival. 15lakh cr to be borrowed this year. huge chunk of the budget is already being paid as interest. No time for money wastage.
True. It seems in India reforms only happen when its the only option left. But at least it happened.
I think all viewers of Print are mentally left and economically right...
@@sagnikdebsarkar169 I would say precisely mentally liberal and economically right
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
finally the Ronald Reagan that we had hoped for India
Ronald Reagan without Term Limit.
@King Lee never said it wasn't
@King Lee 1st India never had RR so that's a big change, while US had many like him india had none that were relevant , infact entire ecosystem in US revolves around capitalism sure there are some socialist policies too
2nd Rising inequality is not wrong if there is improvement in the lives of people at the lower end of the spectrum, you cannot give everyone 💯/💯 in a exam regardless of what he has written in the test , take Scandinavian countries for example look the the inequality there , take china , take US for example infact take any country with a significant population and economic size
@King Lee Economy isn't a Zero sum game. Your argument that one group getting richer will make another group poor by default poor has been debunked since Adam Smith.
Also there's no such thing as trickle down Economics but it's called supply side.
If supply side doesn't work then how come Ireland, Singapore or Hong Kong have high revenue despite low taxes? Laffer curve.
Plus Reagan got USA back on track from stagflation which Keynesian economists couldn't understand and finally dissolution of USSR happened.
Plus Liberalization of indian economy since 91 has lifted more people put of poverty than any government program. Market is the way.
Ronald Reagan was a disaster for Americans middle class... please read American history... His policies created a huge gap between poor and rich..
According to PIB:
Foodgrain production: 295.67 million tonnes --> 40% is 118.27 million tons
Fruits production: 98 million tons --> 40% is 39.2 million tons
Vegetables production: 185 million tons --> 40% is 74 million tons
Is it possible to have this much capacity for single organisation?
This is for people to think
When has politics been based on rationale reasoning in India? Irrespective of the parties, if people were voting on the basis of facts, numbers we should have achieved far more as a nation in the last 73 years. Did you really think the protest are related to farm laws? It’s an excuse. Keep your eyes opened and wait for many more such protests to keep taking place in India over the next 3/4 years. Till such time when we lose all the steam and get back to 4/5% of growth.
In 1950s & 60s , when whole of Asia (South Korea , Japan, Singapore) aligned with so called 'capitalist' America, India aligned itself with 'Socialist' USSR. All those countries who turned to socialist policies remained poor and look at where SK, Japan and Singapore stand today. To some extent, our alignment with Super Power aligns national economic policies too. Congress until 1991, made the wrong choices.
There are so many capitalist countries out there for decade but still dirty poor, you can be socialist country but become rich, the key issue here is the land ownership, in South Korea , Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, and China, gov't own the land. India needs to do a land reform. No land reform, no economy take off.
I think more than Congress extreme turn to the left, this marks the end of Congress Party.
Sincerely hope so, there nemis should come now.
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
The biggest challenge is to deal with union leaders now that Congress and global left have shown interest in throwing their weight behind them.
True ...and NGO too
as a rationalist, I want to say only one thing HAVE FAITH
have faith in the private sector sooner the better
Easy to miss the sarcasm in the first line.
@@nikhilkalra6232 do not know in what way you are taking this I want to one thing that we gave the chance to socialist strategies for too long and 91 liberalizations really boosted Indian economy now let it happen to next level and trust private players
and people like ambani and adani are prioritijed bcz medium or small players loose their guts easily and gave it away to foerign players like in flipkart
and if we can make our bezos and musk in form of ambani adani so atleast they are enough big that they can keep it under control of indians
what if someone lies Bansal get those airports and then their company majority is taken by any foreign company it could totally create security and sovereignty issues in long term
so my view is that privatization is good but regulation is must
@@bhartiyasena9189 capitalism exploits poor
@@shaileshagrawal7242 It does not mean we hate good and hard-working rich and please choor section of middle class
look brother giving name to ideologies and think things will run as the ideology says is like the experiments in science classes looks good in lab ideal condition but the real world is different
it is the same here as china for the case a communist country when things do not work the name communist china remains but everything is changed now and it works for them where America wants democracy in the USA but not really in another world bcz it challenges their superiority
for keep aside terms and try to do whatever works for India to become a modern country
no5 in GDP nominal
no3 in GDP PPP
but still no city to is clean we can see poor even outside our parliament so tiet up loose ends and make everybody under tax radar this should be the ultimate goal it will only make path for modern society
@@shaileshagrawal7242 I do not want to please those people who want a government job and do nothing
or do business and do not want to give taxes
no matter if anybody is poor or rich
farming is a business, not a charity if anybody does not make a profit out of it and should change profession
or private companies should come in to give a structure for farming like dairy structure which is growing and working fine
I am from Uttrakhand in my village everybody says they are farmers but no one even grows enough to feed themselves and get in lines for ration government shops for free grains so if private sector comes it will create structure and give a way to grow something profitable which creates jobs also the taxes at least people in villages add to the tax economy
Was trying to explain to my niece the difference between left and right in politics, as unlike west - in Indian democracy there was never a clear line. Now i have this video:-)
Centre forward is the ultimate solution to score a goal for the status : developed country.
😀
Every time we had country running with socialist/communist principle we have ended with disaster be it Russia or Cuba. Privatisation and Capitalism is the way to go. We just have to make laws to avoid crony capitalism and monopolies.
"As I grow older, I pay less attention to what men say. I just watch what they do " Andrew Carnegie
Political parties in kerala :- *We know only communism and socialism*
And beef
Even after 6.5 years of their fathers rule northies still blame nehru, socialism, leftists and pakistan for their shitty life
If India makes an embrace of the free market I have no doubt that double digit GDP growth is possible. The 2020s might be for india what the 2000s were for China
Indian don't even have the guts to embrace of the free market for Chinese app for games, how could you get double digit growth?
@ather zaidi European car companies are already in India and are doing well. BMW, Mercedes and Audi all are doing well. Europeans make shit middle class cars that's why they cannot beat Suzuki and other Japanese, Koreans. Why would free trade in automobile trouble Indian companies when European cars are already sold in India. In fact Europeans might build cars in India and export to Europe. They have more to worry than us
@@helensun2551 the whole asean trade treaty is scared of Indian software companies. Why should we allow their games if they don't want our software?
@@mumbai3008 Windows 10 very hard to use, crash from time to time, Boeing 737M crash twice, Indian Moon landing crash, who can trust Indian software?
@@mumbai3008 When India can bring some Moon rocks back to Earth we may consider Indian software.
Shekhar Sir should groom a young Journalist to continue his legacy for pure journalism . Cheers to The Print🙏
If you remember an episode where he introduced his reporters, they are all young and the icing on the cake is that most were women.
There are 3: DK, Neelam, and Snehesh each with their own expertise and a pragmatic approach to their journalism. I'd bet on Neelam. She seems to be a right-libertarian without any prejudice towards or contempt for other ideologies.
Hi Rohit. Do keep writing in.
not the richest person in the world has enough money to create monopoly in Indian agricultural market . that is a stupid argument by Rahul Gandhi .
Exactly!!!
This is the same thing that I've tried to explain to so many people. We're not Chile, scales are totally different, even if Ambani sold his entire stock and invested all the money in Farm Sector, it still won't be enough to even capture 50℅ of the market share, but people are too dumb to get it.
@@Prashant44082 some are really stupid believe everything . those who follow left ideology basically have a heard mentality like sheeps . nothing enters their brain .
You bhakts I think you are working in corporate companies
@CyberPunk Warrior i was talking about the scale of agricultural market in India . Usa 1)less than 5% dependent on agriculture it's easy to create monopoly if number of farmers is very less . 2)total population1/5 th of India.
Not comparable at all.
adding to it they are way more richer than India thanks to their free market capitalist economic system
@CyberPunk Warrior what's your definition of monopoly? A single entity ruling them all right? See the article you shared for yourself. It says monopoly of a multitude of companies. That's an oligopoly. And American agriculture has actually matured to that point where they need to inculcate a socialist idea of ensuring a minimum wage and the basic meal as their own incentives. We have been socialist since independence. There is where the difference lies.
Unfortunately Rahul doesn’t seem to have any ideology.. I’m a centrist (not a bhakt).. but I somehow feel that Modi at least has an agenda or a vision or an ideology as to how he wants to see India(right or wrong)..on the other side, I see a very reactive approach from the congress and Rahul Gandhi.. they don’t seem to have any ideology that they actually believe in.. their only agenda seems to be to dislodge Modi from the seat of power
Now you can be unabashed bhakt. India is capitalist now...and it took 6 years of you to find the great agenda. Why, nothing much yeilded personally after selling hatred, hindutva and majoritarianism? Now it's the turn of capitalism and you believe the feku. Then you say you are not a bhakt. Lol
@@sujithkumar2041 see.. this is what I hate about the extreme left or extreme right.. you brains don’t seem to have the capacity to understand the meaning of objective/dispassionate/unbiased analysis.. I really don’t understand how you really appreciate SG’s style of journalism without understanding this.. I love SG because he objectively analyses and gives his opinions based on strong arguments and data.. he has been critical of Modi more often than not.. there may be times when I even disagree with what he says but I have huge respect for him because he’s not like you who hates something only because Modi said it... now look at what Modi has done.. in my opinion, he’s the only prime minister who has taken his own poll manifesto seriously.. whether it is CAA, 370, Ram mandir or farm bills(doubling of farmer’s income by 2024 was his poll promise).. now you may or may not agree with the way he’s going about achieving these things.. you may not even agree to the goals that he has set for himself in his manifesto.. but he has set his goals with the manager(people who have voted him to power) and he’s working towards achieving THOSE goals.. and he’s doing a good job at that
CAPITALISM FTW boys!
Right is always Right
Proud to be a right libertarian.
Centre forward is the ultimate solution to score a goal of developed country.
😀
@@k.govardhansingh1278 being centrist is a hard thing because everyone has some bias.
@@k.govardhansingh1278 there is nothing called centre in economics . are you referring welfare+capitalism
There is nothing like opposite of right is always wrong.
SG always surprise me with his perfect analogies!
This is one good topic that you have taken today, I wish I could have seen this 20 years back.
I asked my father when I was 15 years, old that why am I always compared with a better scoring person in the class? and why in financial situations we always compare our selves with the poor? with that logic, should we not compare ourselves with the rich? This is truly a doubt in my mind at that age. My father never replied to it. My doubts surrounding this grew, I saw poverty and poor people glorified in movies and the rich always cunning and corrupt. we were middle class and I truly believed thats how rich people would behave. But why do we pray to God saraswati for money? In my late 20's when I was old enough to understand I understood
The hypocrisy of people around me.
The glorification of the poor,
Bashing of the rich and
Secretly we all desire to be the rich.
This opened my eyes, I was never a materialist person, luckily god has placed me in a good position. Even though I am not one, I admire and respect all the people who wants to earn more money and hence uplift others. Even our religion teaches us to excel in everything including wealth.
Meanwhile Some ppl in kerala : Proud Hindu Communist.
I met a proud Christian Communist from Kerala like 3 hours back. According to him, Kerala's communism has gone through reforms and includes religion now. He also asked to go read Lenin and Marx. When I said religion is opium to masses, I became an andhbhakt for him :')
@@supratikroy6369 😂😂😂 that's the problem with lavdu people
Kerala Christian secularist nationalist capitalist here 🙋🏽
@@arunjkz Gulag is waiting for you, bro! 😂😂
@UCW3m93RxdU1CVMC8lC3tgBw Having fun poking a lot of eyes. Be assured that the economic right is rising in Kerala. May not reflect on electoral politics any time soon, but there are clears signs that Keralites are growing weary of socialism.
Pappu thinks that it's his birth right to rule this country. Sadly those days are over he can rule from Bangkok if he wants.
Bhakt you have already destroyed this country in last 6 years , ask your feku to rule china , so that it becomes weak
@@sureshharinathbabu9717 chamchas of papu as u will say so
@@sureshharinathbabu9717 Using the word 'Bhakt' for everyone who opposes your 'Pappu' ideas is so passe, its not even funny.
See...name calling goes both ways and it does not solve ANY issues.
If going with Modi is 'bhakt'.....what does that make you?....a 'Pappu bhakt' or a 'Liberal bhakt'?
This name calling did not work then and it surely will not work now.
Come up with some other 'logical' points if you and your 'gang' want be be taken seriously.
At least get some one who can speak coherently at the top of the Congress management, if you 'Pappu Bhakts' want to remain relevant.
@@sureshharinathbabu9717 Modi showed your dad Xi who is the boss. Xi had to.withdraw from Pangong Tso with his tail between his legs 😂
Haven't we had enough of left already
China, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam Indonesia, and even Bangladesh developing
Meanwhile me to India: Tera khoon kab kholega😂😂😂
all these countries adopted capitalism .
@@sarathkrishnak6238 Oh yeah? So why is Real estate only going down since 2016 Demonetisation?
You mean India is not developing? India has actually a faster development rate than Indonesia.
And Bangladesh has not crossed our per capita, it was earlier prediction when our GDP was supposed to drop 10.3% by IMF. Now it's revised to 8%
@Aryan Godara Black money is still the same. This is the ground reality.
@Aryan Godara Adani has many thousands of crores of other benefit from Modi, why would he complain?
Finally India shifting towards capitalism. Hope to see a lot of industries moving to india soon.
I had read somewhere, "The rich gets richer because the poor thinks that every opportunity is a scam".
Read rich dad poor dad book.
@@santhoshkumar1000 already read
@@ronitdey6613 Then don't blame rich. Money works like that only.
Deep hain bhai !!
I have seen so many people bashing each other in the comment section, and it seems that some people don't even have a good understanding of how the economy works based on their claims. So as an econ student, I would like to a give my best to make you people understand how an economy grows and what are the advantages and disadvantages of capitalism and socialism.
So what causes economy to grow?
Economic growth if there is no debt or foreign inflows/outflows of money is involved, entirely depends on productivity growth, how much the productive output grows of an economy, that much overall growth will occur. How does so? Let me make you understand with a simple example, suppose in a country 100rs of goods is produced for 100rs of demand, now let's say if the production grows to 200rs worth of current value, then what will happen? It will cause prices to go down by 50% (demand and supply), so you may ask where is the growth? Where is more money? Now see as the cost of things have halved, people's spending power has doubled with the same money so with increasing the money supply by printing more money to accommodate for it, we will see incomes rise. Now it's obviously not as simple as that, if there will be no debt or foreign involvement, no one will have the resources to invest to increase production by that much at the first place, so this "Natural growth" would be VERY slow, expect growth rate of around 0.5% to 1% on the most optimistic side. So, as we can conclude, we need some sort of money FIRST to stimulate growth, it can either be foreign inflows (investments, exports, etc) or debt(loan). And with the money we can increase output either with a "pull" or a "push", now with a pull, we are pulling businesses to increase production by increasing the demand directly by putting this money on the hands of the consumer. Now let's say a person takes a loan to buy a new laptop, so now this money will go into the economy and create demand for more goods to be produced hence increasing output and grow. It's positive is that it is very easy to execute at any given time but it has it's negatives too,as using debt creates cycles, it means current boosted growth comes at a cost of reduced spending somewhere in the future that's why you see most domestic demand lead economies like US or the Europe getting themselves in a recession every 10 year or so. Another drawback is the if too much debt is taken, the market may not be able to keep up with this surge in demand causing prices to shot up(demand and supply). The other method is "push", here we are pushing businesses to take loans to invest and expand there businesses.(now it's great as here the debt isn't being used just for consumption but to build productive assets that will enable businesses to produce more long after the loan is paid back) It's draw back is that it takes sometime for the money in the economy to circulate to create consumer demand so here we can use the increased output to export our products to rapidly bring in money in the economy to grow it in miraculous speeds.
Now as socialism is more focused on making sure "Whatever we have is distributed equally amongst everyone", they often fail to make more money and increase outout hence is typically slower for growth while capitalism because of it's competitive nature pretty is pretty much about "who can produce and fulfill consumers demands most efficiently gets it all". So is capitalism superior? At least according to me it is but again without proper competition in capitalism and without transparency in socialism, both ideology tends to produce the exact opposite results as intended. It is natural to have high inequality in capitalism but it's only a big problem when is managed poorly and in our "IT IS MANAGED POORLY".
I hope you are now clear about it.😊
Hum Do Humare Do = Mataji, Pappuji, Didiji and Land mafia Damaadji.
Don't forget Visionary leader Nehruji
If one wants to stay poor vote for the socialists, I want to be rich I'll be voting for the BJP.
You are being misled
@@user-ke4xg8kf6i no.u r.
Who want to earn more if he constantly feeded by subsidized food(obviously of bad quality), free education(obviously average to below average), constant glorification of poverty and free housing(slums).
I voted for bjpee in 2014 and 2019 but real estate went down. I want real estate to go up. I want FD interest to go up. I want employment to go up not 45 years high unemployment.
@@hemanshubangera5121 Lol..India already has the highest Interest Rates among its peers. For high economic growth In India, the first precondition is to have a low-moderate interest rates. You can either have a fast growing economy & Real estate or have higher interest rates. Choose wisely, you can not have both. Interest Rates in India have to come even further down for Real estate to take off along with the broader economy.
Socialism vs socialism was stagnation. We need capitalism with conscience and care.
I love how eclectic SG's views are. Really shows the sincerity with which he has done journalism. Really like 'National Interest', keep going SG sir.
If BJP stands firm on its new economic right agenda i am willing to forget about their social policies and vote for them at 2024.
Can we say swatantra party re-emerges in BJP
They were less say religious
Wish it were true, but socialism still creeps in BJP, which is arguably needed for politics. Reforms are needed urgently, otherwise this middle income trap hangs loosely...
BJP barely had any semblance with the actual Swantantra Party economically. They used to bat around ideologies like "Gandhian Socialism", "Swadeshi" "Swaraj" in their foundation days by Vajpayee. Then became full-on hindutva under Advani. They never had any economic approach. Hope that changes.
@@parklinkin6624 I think both congress and BJP are on same page, they're just showing difference for the sake of politics.
@@luckygarg9315 usually a ruling govt tries to proclaim itself as socialist as possible. and the main opposition tries to portray the ruling govt as capitalist as possible.
But this was different. Let's see. Maybe Modi is finally to the economic right via populism.
It's a positive shift now that we are talking economics rather than caste, region, language in political disocurse.
The Right way is to go right , if u go left u wl be left...
finally BJP becoming a right wing party!!.
i have never voted before, might vote for BJP, this time.
Best national interest episode in its history. Shekarji, well done!
Hi Sriram! Do keep writing in.
Sir you are making a mistake by comparing between capitalism and socialism . The comparison should be between human excellence and human endeavour on one hand and socialism an euphemism for public loot and corruption on the other hand
Before this bernie sanders's kind of logic common ppl need money for daily expenditure. Per capital income is too low for a common indian to talk about Human excellence & endeavour.
Finally the right course set by BJP... We have had enough of these congress Politicians stabbing all of indians irrespective confusing all classes of people and not doing anything worthwhile for the country except just amassing wealth for themselves !
They people who say that we should tax the rich more if their shares have risen in value during the pandemic are the same people who ask why don't we just print more money and give it to the poor. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
So finally we have neo liberal Right Wing in India.
Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, Ronald Reagan and Margret Thacher can stop rolling in their grave.
Modi is nowhere near Reagan and Thatcher conservative. Just because he privatized a few companies doesnt make him a fiscal conservative. 😂
@@saptarshisengupta8235 Modi follows welfare capitalist politics
FYI: Some countries achieved unimaginable growth and development with Democratic Socialism…
what an analysis..! impressive Shekhar ji - no screaming, no big panel of discussion - pure informative video. Thanks again. God bless.
Please my Indian brothers please support modi new bold reform agenda because Congress left communist they are strongly condem this process so our duty is to support modi new reform model jai hind
BJP is only partially right wing on economic issues. Its allies in RSS are against privatization and the current NDA government has been the most protectionist - raising tariffs, import duties and staying away from RCEP, all of which are measures against free markets
Rcep is not benefitial for india
RCEP only benefits china we have independent free trade deals with all the other countries in RCEP
Protectionism is bad but read up rcep. There's lot of disadvantages for india there.
In 2024, Indian voters will have a clear choice. The best thing that can happen is if BJP drops their communal rhetoric and delivers on these reforms. I hope and pray they do that and voters reward them. However, I fear that the farm protest might just derail all further reforms. Or further reforms such as bank privatisation will cause the protests into snowballing into a nationwide protest movement. That will indeed be tragic. Hope better sense prevails and India seizes it's moment. We finally have Modi doing things most of India voted him for. We are at the crossroads of history and the choice is clear.
Very glad development. Was tired of the government focusing excessively on social conservatism. It was expected of BJP to embrace economic right wing, which finally seems to be happening.
A country that has been capitalist for over 2000 years, is re-learning capitalism. Fascinating.
I think if he keeps doing what he is doing, I am gonna be modi bhakt soon.
😀
Finally he gets to apply Gujarat model we dreamt of.
What exactly is Gujarat model.."
@@sahil_a6584 making the state industry friendly . Gujarath have the lowest unemployment rate for years . credits to modi .
@@sarathkrishnak6238 the rates were always low ..credit to proximity to sea and export/port business ..any data points on how the rates were reduced in Modi regime
I come from UP where to get higher paying jobs people move to Gujarat, that's Gujarat model.
Higher paying jobs, better education and quality of life, it would be foolish to say it doesn't work.
@@sahil_a6584 there are many states in India that has costal region . some of which has very high unemployment rate
Government should only focus on affordable health and education because many people can't afford it.
Very Handsomely said shekhar ji.... 🤝
17 minutes is too short. I wish it becomes 25+ minutes. Sir you are doing a great job
Bhai padh bhi liya karo itna der 😁😁
In the year 1991 per capita income was Rs 6270 and in 2019 it was 1.34 lacs. This is mainly because of liberalization plus IT BT. We are in right direction only tuning is necessary
After wasting six precious years, Modi finally took the steps to reform the economy.
This is a great development IMO. This will make the real left ideological animal of the INC rear it's head quite out in the open. No more bs. It's either this or that. People can make their choice
"Driving with indian characteristics" lmao
Hi , I saw Tejaswi Surya speech. He did not say giving money from honest rich to dishonest poor...He said putting good taxpayers' money into bad govt businesses..and that is true.
Thing to note is how Modi Ji has very successfully made Hindu Nationalism a default in the Indian Politics..None can say anything against it now, and differences can only be along these economic ideologies, where too BJP will rightfully emerge as the real & only Right Wing!
Socialist in india be like: Hippity hoppity everything is my property
At last India is moving in some direction 😁
Expect Roti,Kapda,Makan, Swasthya aur Shiksha everything should be out of government control
For Indira most probably it's her insecurity that started the purge of private enterprises or nationalization may she worried more about her hold over power, rather than being open minded to problems
Shekhar Sir, it's been years now
Please use a better quality mic
We need both right and left right( for creation of wealth) and left( to check the distribution of wealth)
As long as you try to fix problems, doesn't matter whether you are to the right or left of it! The real problem begins when you try to fix what's not broken! Think about it!
That's why I love Modi
Capitalism will bring development and growth in our nation.
Capatalism is very good for development but not in healthcare and education sector.....
India need 80% Capitalism and 20% socialism.
“India has had poverty as State policy “👍🏾
“Weapon of mass destruction, what about the poor”👍🏾
He made 3 crucial points driving from libertarian ideology:
1. Tyranny of status quo
2. Deflated the myth of inefficient, unproductive IAS
3. Endorsing wealth creators
This is exactly why in future we need a presidential 2-party system rather than parliamentry.
Presidential 2 party system has problems too. Smaller parties wouldn't get much voice.
@@gabbar51ngh smaller parties are unneeded in a battle between left and right, you have to side with any one ideology, which will technically remove parties made by and for certain religions or ethnicities.
A good presentation… My two bit
The whole matter is “Elementary Mr. Watson!”
Wealth has to be created before it can be distributed. Government can’t create wealth for distribution. E.g. In Pakistan wealth is “created” mostly by the Army. We know how it is there. China gave up socialism to embrace capitalism and privatization. Russia too has embraced privatization.
Cuba (have you heard of this country?) of course follows total socialism.
Only an efficient and free private sector can create wealth which can be “distributed” to others if necessary. Only private sector can create the required number of jobs.
OK. Areas like space and nuclear can’t yet be privatized in India, though these sectors also have been privatized in some other countries.
Just imagine…If the IT sector in India were to be with the Public sector!!!!!
India should move ahead on this path till become a number 1 economy in the world
please anybody stop modi ji .he will burn his own hand by doing this. As a nationalist I support these reforms but reform's aren't popular to do. this all is a trap .
Thanks for hearing my suggestion, SG. I really appreciate it. 👍🏻
I was eagerly waiting for your take on this issue. Anyways, it's great to see that Indian politics is now heading towards a true left and right divide.
Hi Aman. Thank you for being a loyal viewer of ThePrint.
Best commentary I listened to in a long time, perhaps because SG explained it so well.
Socialist in social policy
Right in economic policy
I just stopped midway in splits to write this..
"You are hit by the weapon of mass destruction.. But what about the poor? And you shut up"-SG
Pretty much sums up many political debates in my college life.
The Rajya sabha debates are probably the best ones I have seen so far. Hats off to both sides on articulating their ideas clearly. Lok Sabha on the other hand ..
Rahul gandhi moved towards left ideology is only because of the international support , it seems evident from the recent events.....
Rajaji, an unabashed right winger, must now be smiling in his grave.
The reform will be successful if media plays constructive role than trashing it.
We are not rich enough for socialism , we need entrepreneurs 👍👍
modern avatar of swantrata party is Lok satta party sadly nobody talks much about it, Shekhar can you do an interview with lok satta's party chief Dr JP, please.
Sorry for my ignorance. Which is the party from? I would like to read more about their policies
Yes. Dr. JP is an honest politician. Always thinks about good for the people and country. Speaks in his senses and not swing with the mob. He is absolute liberal patriot. Has strong belief in culture, quality over quantity, merit over loud noises. Not casteist, communist, communalist, conservationalist, regionalist, oppurtunist. Believer in creation of wealth.
@@shreyamehta3619 buddy i think a word is missing from your questions so I can't understand what you are asking but I think you are asking the state from where this party is, I think it's from Andhra Pradesh or Telangana.
@@vg6548 exactly, i was very disturbed that we don't have any liberal parties in the country, and the few who present themselves as liberals are totally anti-development, but then I got to know about him and for the first time in my life a politician whom I would love to vote
@@flyingspaghettimonster3791 Yes I checked it out and I liked his Centre to Right approach and especially his policies regarding Police and Judicial reforms which is a must. Unfortunately I could not find much press coverage except in Telegu press. Wish more English or Hindi media cover him. I am sure a larger chunk of young voter would be his demographic.
There is no nobility in poverty
I wanna be rich my vote for modi
Thank god bjp is now starting to act like a right wing party now 😊😊