T-62 Main Battle Tank | SMOOTHBORE UPGRADE
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 04. 2020
- Development of the T-62 medium tank commenced in 1957. It was developed from the previous T-55. The first prototype of the T-62 was completed in 1959. It was tested and trialed through 1960 and 1961. In 1961 this tank was officially accepted to service with the Soviet Army. Its production commenced in 1961 and ceased in 1973. Around 20 000 of these tanks were produced in the Soviet Union. Between 1975 and 1978 this tank was license-produced in Czechoslovakia. More than 1 500 tanks were built for export. Until the 1980s it was also produced in North Korea. The T-62 was widely used and is still used during numerous military conflicts all around the world. The T-62 was the last medium tank, produced in the Soviet Union. It was replaced in production and frontline units by the newer T-72 main battle tank. Currently the T-62 is still in service with about 20 countries. Russia keeps these tanks in storage. Largest operators are Cuba, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Uzbekistan, Vietnam and Yemen. Some countries also keep these tanks in storage.
The T-62 follows the lines of the previous T-55. It has the same layout, but has improved firepower and protection. Some of the automotive components are compatible. However the T-62 has a newly-developed hull, turret and gun.
This tank has an all-welded hull and cast turret. Front armor plate is 100 mm thick and has a high inclination angle. Its protection level is equivalent to 200 mm of rolled homogenous armor. Hull sides are 45-80 mm thick. The turret is slightly larger than that of the T-55. Its armor is 105 to 114 mm thick. Protection level of this tank was respectable at the time. The T-62 was a tough nut for contemporary Western tanks. A standard NATO 105 mm gun, used on the French AMX-30, German Leopard 1, and American M60 Patton, could penetrate front armor of the T-62 at ranges of around 1 500 meters. However currently the T-62 is vulnerable to most anti-tank weapons. The tank is fitted with NBC protection and automatic fire suppression systems.
The T-62 is armed with a fully-stabilized semi-automatic 115 mm smoothbore gun. At the time it was the first tank in the world to use a smoothbore gun. It fires APFSDS, HEAT, and HE-FRAG rounds. The APFSDS round outperforms that, fired from the British L7 105 mm rifled gun, that was standard with NATO countries. Maximum rage of fire is up to 4 km at day and up to 800 m at night. The gun of the T-62 has a spent case ejection mechanism. Cases are ejected from a door in a turret rear. However its rate of fire is only 4 rounds per minute. The T-62 can fire accurately on the move. A total of 40 rounds are carried for the main gun.
There is also a 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun and 12.7 mm roof-mounted machine gun.This tank has a crew of four, including commander, gunner, loader and driver. The T-62 is powered by a V-55V diesel engine, developing 580 hp. The same engine is used on the T-55. Some T-62 tanks were fitted with improved V-55U (620 hp) and V-46-5M (690 hp) engines. Suspension of the T-62 has been revised. With auxiliary fuel tanks this machine has a range of 650 km. The tank can be fitted with a deep wading kit and ford water obstacles up to 5 m deep.
Numerous variants of the T-62 have been produced. Only some of them are listed below. Also a number of upgrade programs were available for this tank. Some countries still offer upgrade packages.
Hope you enjoy!!
💰 Want to support my channel? Check out my Patreon Donation page! www.patreon.co...
💰PayPal: paypal.me/Mats...
Matt’s DREAM: www.gofundme.c...
👕 Check out my Merch: teespring.com/...
📬Wanna send me something? My PO Box: Matthew James 210A - 12A Street N Suite
#135 Lethbridge Alberta Canada T1H2J
📸 My instagram: Matt_matsimus
🎮 Twitch: / matsimus_9033
👋DISCORD: / discord
📘 Facebook: www.facebook.c...
🐦Twitter: / matsimusgaming - Auta a dopravní prostředky
During the Iran - Iraq war, Iraqi T62's easily penetrated the front turret armor of Iranian Chieftains at normal combat ranges with APFSDS rounds. This was a shock to the British, which led to the Stillbrew armor upgrade for British Chieftain tanks.
@Ali Kareem Neamah Of course! Though a lot would depend on crew quality.
During Iraq - Iran war Soviets had T-80 as the main tank, so, not surprised :)
@Ali Kareem Neamah no
Any Armor with the word BREW is not a good name. Now add Still to it? Im only picking as I know nothing pertaining to this type of armor. But phrases like It will still brew upon being hit. Are what honestly came to mind upon reading this comment about this up grade. Stay Safe And Sanitized
@@STEVEN-STEELE Named after the two men who developed it. Colonel Still and John Brewer.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stillbrew_armour
T-62 was the special child that ended having to hold the door for far too long
*Hodor*
@@mikhailzavarov4958 i was thinking the same thing.
Lol
@Jose Raul Miguens Cruz Do you understand the joke
I mean it looked cool, eh I guess I can move on to the t80 because they look similar... what about you, like the t62?
A note about the Tiran; this name was given to several Israeli-captured and modified Russian tanks ranging from the T-54 to the T-62, the T-62 being designated "Tiran-6". The tank used in the movie "The Beast of War" for example is a Ti-67 Tiran which is a T-55 fitted with a western-designed 105mm gun in place of the Soviet 100mm gun and the Commander's DShK replaced with a Browning M2HB. When I first saw the movie, I mistook the tank for a T-62 because of the gun.
Good movie.
3cm of steel plates?
This is one T H I C C tank
This is for anti heat projectiles not for AP shells
@@Neonblue84 ArE yOU SUrE aBOuT tHAt ?
@@TheMadVulpen yeah if you mean the "eyebrows". Because the space between this plates was filled with polyurethan (or so^^) and that let sink the heat penetrating rate (for atmg of the 1. and 2. generation, today is that all little helpers of course obsolete)
@@Neonblue84 ik I was memeing
Just Some Guy without a Mustache isn’t that just 30mm? Sry I’m American
Not sure you are aware , but at 10:04, despite having a fume extractor, this is a T-54 type tank. Note the gap between the first and second road wheels, along with the mushroom shaped ventilator on top of the turret. You mention the layout of the road wheels in the video, and you may be purposely showing a T-54 in order to illustrate those differences, but I wasn't sure. Regardless, a quick internet search shows that this exact tank is a Chinese Type 59 being displayed at Tank Fest. This short video clip is a great example that really illustrates your point. If a person were to look at just the fume extractor, they would assume this is a T-62. Thanks for the great videos and keep up the good work!
You dont looking carefooly !
Its getting really confusing with tanks like the Typ69 IIA with the 100mmm smoothboregun
I like the type 59 or T54A
@John4566442... LOL, all the same, T54, 55, 62, etc., they were still all targets to us! We had MBT recognition card decks and as far as we were concerned, we spot em mostly via turret shapes, especially frontal turret silhouettes. If we could see and count their road wheels, they were dead meat already.
Judging by the western smoke launchers and presence of 105mm gun, type of font used for the numerals i think thats Israeli modernized T-55 (i dont remember its exact name rn)
That fact that upgraded Isreali Shermans were knocking these out in 73 with 105mm heat rounds is a testament to just how good the basic Sherman design was is
It's more a testament to how superior a HEAT round is, to a steel armor of any thickness. All it took to stop these is a little composite add-on, but during the late 60s-70s no tank was truly safe from chemical rounds.
The T54 and T62 were among my favorite tanks in World of Tanks.
I think they are,T55,T62, the ABSOLUTELY BEST LOOKING TRACKED ARMORED VEHICLES EVER!!!!
T-55 = AK-47
T-62 = AKM
T-72 = AK-74
T-90 = AK-74M
T-14 Armata = AK-12
Yep i can definitely see a pattern here, anyways great review of the Underrated Soviet Tank which is the T-62 never knew this awhile back also can't wait for your next review about what kind of military hardware btw. 😃
We don't talk about the T-80
@@wallachia4797 T-80 is more like an AKS-74 to me, as i imagined it.
Meanwhile T-64 be like :- Guess I will disappear.
@@patriotenfield3276 t-64 and t-80: the ugly stepchild
Not as good as some other tanks... but they had TWENTY THOUSAND of them!
@IS 2 mod.1944 NATO came to the same conclusion hence the entire doctrine was to mount a fighting retreat and the use of nukes, intill helicopters and other technologies made it possible to potentially mount a proper stand. from what i have read anyway.
@IS 2 mod.1944 yep, that is a lot!
Lord Solar Matthius- after the nukes what would be left to mount a response to?? Cockroaches..
@IS 2 mod.1944 thats a lot of tanks holy shit
Quantity is a quality on its own
In the 80. Slovakia was one of the countries who producting many tanks. We first build 34,85 in the40. and 50. Than some bmp1 and t72 tanks and of course modernized tanks such as t55am2. And in the past we were in the third place behind the USA and Soviet Union who producting so many armored wehicles. And in the past we have actualy more tanks than USA but not for long time. I mean for country small Like this it was nice. But is shame now we dont have many of this tanks today. We have just fiew of them. Over all nice vid mate.
I've always been astounded by how much military equipment Slovakia produced for it's size.
In 80s, Slovakia did not exist. It was part of Czechoslovakia, and it was far from small country.
@@jiridrapal7512 Well yeah but that doesnt change the fact that many wehicles stilll produce in the Slovakia not in czech cuz we got a lot stuff and dont need to many help from other counties and allmoust all parts are made in Slovakia soooooo y know. After brake up with czech many our factories change and this nice wehicles was stop producing in that many numbers. We still have some Great new ideas how to modernizate our and others guns but everythign cost Money.
@@eikbolha5883 it was industry built on Slovakia by United country not by Slovakia itself.
Great video, Matsimus! Old Soviet era tanks definitely have a special place in my heart
Loving the music, Matt! So happy to see an alternative to the 'stuff' on every other channel. Very sick of current events on endless loop, and over-analysis. I'd much rather watch your detailed analysis of the T62. Keep doing it.
I was actually in one before, the turret was SO cramped and low! Wow, I couldn't imagine operating and living in one that way as a Soviet tank crew! Inside the turret was like being cramped inside a compact car with the rest of the tank crew.
Some might say that commander and Gunner are GAY...good close for romance.but the sheer number of these will make some impact though.auto eject for the fired cases are nice
Matsimus, thank you for this gift! T-62! Woo!
I am currently participating in a restoration of a Syrian T62 (it's on my CZcams channel), in many ways this tank is very smart in its simplicity. Great content, thank you!
Dmitriy T. Wanna say, congrats on the first drive!
@@ethanleslie8329 thank you! there is still so much to do
"We make tank to replace T-55, so here is T-62... No, too expensive, we wait for next tank"... Then you have T-64 which was even more expensive... And had to wait until T-72... lol Then a disaster with T-80 only to get a good T-90 after that...
Russian tanks seem to be like Microsoft Windows; every other seems to be working as intended.
T-14 bylat Ivan our economy can't handle it too expensive.
Ivan Stepanovic like windows Vista...
@@redsorgum Let's make Win 95... People hate it, but we see what's wrong, so we make functional 98... Next, win 2k... Everybody hates it, full of bugs, but xp follows and it's fine... Then Vista and people are desperate... So, they make Win 7 which is rather good! Then we got Win 8 and people were like "WTF is this"... And so on...
@@danbu92 Not saying it is anything out of the ordinary, pretty much any major army in the world had the same issues. They make one thing, it fails, so they improve or make something based on good characteristics of the failed one. For example, have you watched the movie "Pentagon Wars"? Or some things Mat also mentioned in his previous vids (for example, that US AA vehicle). Just saying it here...
@@danbu92 wouldn't it be possible to create a modular platform which I think based on the info the armata does much better.
Kind of like our car Companies in the us, many are sharing axles, Transmissions, engines, frames, and much more.
Seems like the Russians are having the same problem as the Germans in WW2 which was too many manufacturers making to many different variants increasing cost dramatically and reducing production.
The manufacturers should adopt a platform to work with but have packages they can add to their own version.
I watched that movie “The Beast” that you told us about.
It was awesome😎
Feel free to suggest any others
One thing the Soviets were good at was spitting out serviceable tanks.
White Tiger
T-34 Russian movie
@@reu8867 Не смотри этот мусор!
Where can I find the beast on internet
Mark Acosta Jr.
amazon prime video
T-55 and T-62 and very noticeably different, even in M form. ALL T-62’s have a stretched area behind the turret. The T-55 has a much more centric turret position where as the T-62’s turret is biased forward of center. Also I’m not sure about the T-62 being a stop gap design. The development project was underway before the T-64’s. I think the continued production of the T-62 was a stop gap measure but actual design and development was it’s own project which ended up be overshadowed by the T-64 which was the HMS dreadnaught of the MBT world. The T-62 was designed and developed by Ural whereas the T-64 was designed and developed by KMDB. Additional, the Soviet Military allowed Ural access to the T-64’a tech. Ural then took the T-64’s advantages and applied them to the T-62 chassis and developed the T-72. Also to my knowledge the T-64 was never exported. KMDB was based in Ukraine and this is why Ukraine has the T-64 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
"Ilyich's eyebrows" basically means "Brezhnev's eyebrows".
That guy scared the shit out of me when I was a kid. He looked like he'd have no problem pushing the button and Carter was a wimp. Those were scary times
@@josephkool8411 scary
If it would be produced in Poland, there would be polish modernized versions just like T-55AM Merida or T-72M Wilk
The main battle tanks of Russia were designed simply just like old Soviet designs. Simple designs that produce big numbers. The Cold War tactics of the Soviet Union was to produce a basic tank in great numbers to over come N.A.T.O. In a quick lightning attack. Unfortunately the Russian main battle tank kept the rounded turret that had an advantage of deflecting shell hits but limited crew response to firing. The turret limited its fire rate. Don’t get me wrong it is a deadly tank but that’s why Russia came up with the T-14 Armata. Basically put the T models are to old to survive on the modern battlefield. This was proven many times in various conflicts with western tanks.
Good to hear another fine commentary produced by Matsimus!
Matsimus: Thank You for another thought provoking video.
T-62 illustrates the Russian problem - especially in these days. Russia has incredible problems financing their armoured forces. It seem like - at the moment - that the T-14 Armata is going nowhere. Provided they get the kinks sorted out, the introduction of the Armata has at least been postponed.
This refers back to another video with Matsimus: The one discussing the merits/flaws of updating existing western tanks. It is allways a consideration if an update - with its inherent drawbacks is sufficient to do the job. In case of the T-62 it clearly wasn't in so far, as they got creamed meeting Israeli Centurions.
I believe the Soviet Union then stood in the same problem as Russia does with the Armata today. The Armata is clearly a better tank than the T-72 (even in its updated version); but the main problem is there: With the falling oil prices it is extreemly unlikely that Russia will be able to afford the Armata in anything but token numbers.
It is like the proverbial Tiger tank that had the allies worried no end. It was simply to expensive to build - let alone transport around.
The next illustration is the T-64/T-65 where the T-62 should hold the fort untill the T-64/T-65 was build in sufficient numbers. Problem was that sufficients numbers of a to expensive tank - and the Sovjet economy was all the time similarly strained - was to heavy a burden on the budget. The solution was the T-72 tank.
The T-72 is a "budget-freindly" tank, but it demanded hoardes of them to get the job done.
Besides: I saw that the canadian (with F-18) are involved in an exercise with the A-10 Warthog, ostenciably against the fast patrol boats of the Iranians.
Thomas Borgsmidt T-64/65? I only know T-64 but there is no T-65
"Russia has incredible problems financing their armoured forces. " there is no such problem.
"falling oil prices " has nothing to do with that, all russian tanks are completely produced in Russia from russian steel and parts made on russian factories and payed in russian rubels.
Stop this "Sovjet economy" propaganda bullshit.
T-14 is still on trials and evaluation, it is 100% new tank. All previous tanks done the same way. First trials, after that serial production.
I hope we see the UH-1 Huey and its upgraded versions in the next video. :D
As do I, but I'd love to see one on the AMX 13 and its variants
@Ami du Canada You mean AH-1, which is a Cobra variant. Unless you mean the UH-1Y Venom, which is just as cool as the original Huey. :D
Many sources claim Vietnam had T-62 or T-72 but I haven't seen picture of any in internet, book or magazine. Only T-55 and news of recently acquired T-90. Only the T-55/54 and the Type 63 amphibious tank or PT-76 used in the third Indo-China war in Cambodia by vietnam. They had to deploy it if they possess some. BTW, I've trained eyes to distinguish the models of soviet tanks.
There was the T62A with the older 100mm gun, but it (the gun) had reached it's limit so the 115 smoothbore came to being
Awesome video!! As an American, just LOVE Soviet armored vehicles from WWII to present.
I was actually really wanted a video on the t-62, thanks Matsimus
I have been waiting for something about the T-62 for quite a while. Very few youtube videos about this one. So Tanks a lot ;)
I wouldn't say that it wasn't necessarily horrible for tank on tank fighting. More of it wasn't employed properly to its strengths. We know that most Russian tanks were designed with limited gun elevation and depression, making this tough to fight an uphill battle. This is partly the reason why the Israelis cause such high losses at the Battle of Golan Heights. But on a relatively flat terrain, I am sure it was a force to be reckon with at its time.
Horsepower doesn't have mutch say in top speed unless you change the transmission as well. The engine can only go as fast as the transmission allows it to. Lets say you have an old VW Golf with a top speed of 120kmh. you can add a turbo to the engine, it will make the car accelerate faster because of more horsepower, but if you go faster than 120kmh the engine will blow up because the transmission is what allowed it to go just 120kmh.
2:30 - Yes, in Czechoslovakia we never made T-62, but in that time still versions of T-54/55 and later export versions of T-72. There was an idea to use T-62 in our army, but it was rejected, when even soviet experts said that T-62 wasn't so good in many aspects like T-55. But, in which book you find that Steven Zaloga wrote T-62 was manufacutred in Czechoslovakia? He has many books, but I looked immediately into T-62 Main Battle Tank 1965-2005 and he wrote only that US intelligence believed that Czechoslovakia manufactured T-62 tanks and it appears to have been a mistake according on Czech and Slovak informations. 3:20 - This tank had also Bulgaria, but in small numbers. 13:15 Well, I never read/heard about that, but maybe...Yet Israelis found out the gun can't be loading when gun elevation is +3,5° (and for loader was whole process difficult - cramped space, ammo must be loading into gun with great force, and at the end, loader must affirm loaded gun with button).
both Poland and Chechoslovakia evaluated T-62, in the mid-60s it was indeed improvment over T-55, but too costly in the end; also Soviets said that new tank (I mean T-72 or other predicted T-64 alternative back then) will be available few years later, and in the 1978-1979 both countries aquired first T-72s
Awesome vid with great info! At some point, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the T-10M tank.
Thicc boi
Fact that Centurion 2's are still in active combat right now speaks some shit.
ive always understood the T-62 to be classed as a medium tank by the soviets, with their first true MBT being the T-64. also, you can tell the difference between a T-55 and T-62 by looking a the turrets as well as the hull, the T-55 has a slightly taller, narrower turret (not quite a circle), and the roof has what looks like 2 angled welded plates , wheras the T-62 has pretty much a circular turret with a lower profile other than the commanders hatch, in one single cast. admittedly it would be hard to tell the difference from a distance.
Yah but they were decently armoured mediums tanks for their time at least.
Just got this tank in war thunder! reking all the britsh tanks because I finally have a stabilized gun lol
Should have waited for victory day sales dude
Dang I’m still working on the t34 85 and zis-5 kv1
now they have a really sweet taste of their own medicine. )))))
but hell the stock round even feels great to use
i still need to unlock it, but that shouldn't be a problem comrad
On my way to the T-64 and T-62 -M1 the grind stills feels very painful
@@PeenileCansir Nice. May take me a couple weeks to get the 64
Interesting fact, t62KN came with TNA-2 navigation system and 9M14 AT-3 Sagger ATGM launcher. My favorite. Good video!
Yes I've been waiting for this video for so long!!!! The T-62 is one of my favorite MBTs ever made I have a 1/32 scale model of it in my room and plan to build a steel 1/16th gasoline model
I think it would be cool to delve into some of the prototype tanks that were built but not mass produced. Eg obj 279e, t95e6, pa65 mutz, hwk series of tanks just to name a few.
Become immobile become a pill box.
Out of ammo become a bunker.
Out of time, become heroes..
Yes thx for the upload matt
T-62's the tank of its time
Coaxially mountain machine gun was of little use in Afgjanistan. Could never elevate enough to take on mujjajadin in the mountainous terrain. Great vid.
Russia: let's do an upgrade to our proud T62 tank
T-72: he~yyy
People that play steel armor: blaze of war should find this vehicle very familiar. I do believe the radio is on the left side of the turret, in between the commander and Gunner.
Glad you made a video about this vehicle
but hey, it's the best Rank VI Grinder in War Thunder :D
because the tank can literally do anything, but one small problem in War Thunder's post war Soviet Vehicles. that is that there always is an Ammo Rack beside the driver and behind an Fuel tank.
but nevertheless it feels like a great vehicle to drive, even when you don't have anything upgraded
Unlike the USMC tank video this actually had substance.....10/10
Czechoslovakian T-62 a myth? I believe there is one in Fort Benning, Georgia and one in Bovington, UK. Whether these were only assembled in Czechoslovakia or fully made I cannot say for certain, but all the parts are labeled in Latin letters as well as Cyrillic. I find it very strange for Russians to be so helpful. Most Russian equipment in my country, notably helicopters and planes, has Cyrillic labels and younger soldiers who do not read the Cyrillic script use stickers to mark the gauges. That's why I think it is quite possible that these tanks were made in Czechoslovakia
Thank you thank you thank you thank you!!!!! I’ve been dying for you to make a video on this tank
Mat, First, thank you for another very informative video. Second, please forgive the formatting - YT hates my Surface tablet and removes all the paragraph breaks., That said, the more powerful engine not increasing the top speed isn't too uncommon. Speed is based in part on the power of the engine, but also on gearing of the transmission final drive/transfer case/rear axle. For example, if the original engine has a maximum RPM of 2500rpm (assuming diesel, but any substitution works) and the new motor has the same redline, then the maximum speed won't change. What changes is how long it takes to achieve maximum speed in any given gear and improved torque for low-speed operation. Maximum speed only changes when the replacement engine has a different maximum RPM. Whether higher or lower, the maximum speed will change with the max engine revs. This is assuming that the vehicles' gearing is such that it can achieve max RPM in top gear. Ideally, what you see with an engine upgrade is increased performance in rough terrain and low speed maneuvering. The catch is that if the new engine has more available power than the rest of the power train was designed for, then you're going to see increased breakage / poorer reliability in the rest of the power train.
does FCS really matter when you can shoot APFSDS which go like a laser, compare to western side relying on HEAT-FS
HEAT maintains pen over any distance.
@@surferofthesynthwaves4710 you don't get my point.
hitting with HEAT-FS is difficult at long range, it is not just slow but also flying terribly at long range, so it require FCS but, APFSDS is not.
@@rhino1207 but apfsds loses pen over long distances
@@surferofthesynthwaves4710 ? does it matter to what I saying? is less penetration at long range related to importance of FCS?
I dont care about western tanks
T-62 wasn't licence made in Czechoslovakia. But Czechoslovakian peoples army (from now ČSLA) rumor said that ČSLA has 8 T-62 or T-64 nobody really know for comanding other tanks (T-54/55 and all types that ČSLA have) because of better radios. But really nobody knows what happened to them after '89 or '93 .
Awesome thanks for the great work Sir
Hey Matt during your time down south in country did you happen to see any burnt out remnants of tanks or a PC’s? During my time north and east of Jalalabad there wasn’t a day I didn’t see a burnt out hull. Asalabad’s western perimeter was littered with bmp’s and T series tanks. A sight to behold for sure. I didn’t see my original comment post so if it did and this is in duplicate I am sorry M8
The T62 have a variant that uses the 100mm rifle instead of the 115mm smoothbore called the T62A.
You mentioned that the T-62 has NBC protection, but how can that be? There is a rear hatch in the turret that automatically opens to eject spent casings, which would expose the crew in the case of an NBC attack. Was this feature removed from the tank or something?
Thanks for the vid sir.👍🏼👍🏼
There are no tall Russian tankers.
Mike 1958 Yep. Possibly the most famous of tankers Mikhail Kalashnikov was 5ft 3in.
well, in Austria I met one Afghanistan man 185 cm or more, he was a tanker in T 55 tank.. he said, no problem, just hush down or sit a little..so far about hight and tanks.
Conscripts over a certain height were usually segregated away from tank units. Some fell through though :D
The fact that the canadians are exercising in team with the A-10 brings back memories of the A-10 that ALLWAYs had an anti invasion role. When the A-10 was new - yes I am that old - I saw it in an anti- invasion exercise in Denmark.
Now I also saw the USMarines training invasion in Lithuania - the coastline is comparable - very long shoaling beach with sand. I cringed: One A-10 would have massakred the marines swimming ashore. That is one objective of an exercise: To see if the enemy has that option?
They have the SU25, so yes, they did have that option.
Great info. Much enjoyed.
THe part where you say that it's not an anti-tank tank but an infantry support tank literally encompasses the Soviet CONOPS for tanks. To Soviets tank v tank warfare isn't primary role for the tanks. That was the role of the artillery and aircraft. And they are right to say that since from WW2 and all the way through to now, tank losses are at least 80% due to enemy CAS planes and attack helicopters.
Служил в Чехословакии на Т-62, танк - воин.
North Koreans have made versions with Kontakt-5 ERA, 125mm gun, Atgm and Manpads!!!....also T-62Ms seem to be doing alright in Syria after Russia sent war stocks
Are you just doing overviews on vehicles in squad? Because if you are I like it.
9:56 thats not a T-62 but a chinese Type 59.
Pretty much a T-55 with a knockoff L7 105 gun
To easily identify a T-54 from a T-62 it to look at the turret shape.
The T-62 has a complete round turret while the T-54 has more of a droplet shape.
..... I thing the upgrades were called "Brejnev eyebrows " , I believe his middle name was Ilich .... that is why "Ilich eyebrows" ...
One would believe the author would put more emphasis on the T-62’s claim to fame. It was the first smoothbore ffs.
Im curious as to the H.P. upgrade? The top speed remained the same probably due to the transmission and final drive gearing not being changed. However Im thinking the ability to maneuver may have improved. Top speed being good. But im betting the crews would really like being able to go from 0 to even 10 Mph faster would be well liked. Imagine setting static at road side and hearing the dreaded sound of a jet or I would think even more dreaded womp womp womp of rotor blades Being able to get to cover faster or traversing the hull faster to maneuver to engage an enemy tank quicker is what that H.P. increase afforded the tank. Yes turret traverse speed is very important in a engagement, but getting your hull into cover is mabe more important as to staying alive to shoot is a good thing. There is also this may have been an upgrade for future weight increases from module additions. At any rate I always liked the T62 and T55 I also liked the British Crusader. At the age of 8. My Dad was an E5 8th Infantry Chemical Corps HQ Co. He had taught basic at Ft Jackson S.C. But we were then stationed to Aberdeen Proving Grounds. Edgewood Arsenal in Md. Aberdeen P.G.? OMG Tank Heaven to a 8 year old boy. Who Breathed eat and slept anything Army. I slept in my little Olive Drab BDUs and combat boots. That Dad taught me to spit shine. I probably had some of the best mirror bright Boot Tips on post lol. As I polished those puppies like my life depended on it. Im sure my arm thought. This boy has hit puberty early and with clock work. But the Armor that post had. All U.S. Armor as it was developed And all enemy and even peace time Armor the U.S. captured bought or five finger discounted came there to be tested.I climbed on and played on everything from T34s 34/85s All the WWII German Pzs Models III IV I even have a scar on my right shin from missing the tooth on a Panthers drive sprocket. You have no idea the size of some of these things till next to one. The IS series? HUGE!!! The little French Renault FT17 looks like a VW Bug next to some. They were Americas !st MBT And What got General George C SCott ummm Patton lol cut his teeth on. He commanded Americas 1st Armor assault on mass in WWI With a number of these IDK the numbers anymore but more than 10 I think. Love the videos Sir Please keepem rolling our way. ARMOR VIDEO UP!!!!!
Numbers count but tanks like this are vunerable to late designs but that depends on the Countries defense budget1
Matsimus just takes stock footage and reads an article out of Jane's Fighting Vehicles. It would be nice if someone whose analysis and understanding of this stuff extended beyond saying "beautiful" 9 times for each video. Where does he get this stock footage?
Can you do a video on the difference from rifled guns and smoothbore guns?
Ah the tanks it’s amazing
To bad it had pretty much no gun depression and the hull armor was relatively thin compared to the turret.
Crickey. What a terrible suspension. Those Russians have hard heads.
good tank , thanks mr matsimus
Thanks mate yeah I was in Iraq and most of the T62a I saw fell victim to the high speed penetrator on the Abrams also I play world of tanks blitz and the 62a is really good medium 😊
The most beautiful tank
Add on reactive etc armour make quick recognition more difficult
was the t62 more or less cramped than the t72? for note this is my favourite second gen mbt.
I bet the two T-62s smacked one another at9:51. At one point the bumped fenders and it looked like they were going to collide. Then the scene changed like nothing happened at 9:52.
The soviet tank program was the opposite of their political stance. The soviet block opted for continues production with evolution of their tanks where as the Western counterparts opted for revolution, with big changes per generation.
Why do some tanks use charges and some tanks don't? And what do they do?
Makes reloading easier you wouldn't carry an entire shell of 152mm gun
Variants of the T'62 are made new in North Korea to this day, various upgrades continue.
Northern Alliance or NA still have numbers of these Soviet Era Main Battle Tank or MBT the T62 on there Arsenal in the Panjshir Valley
Great and informative video man keep it up
People think it sucks but it compares favorably against its contemporaries(M60/Chieftain).
Do you have any proof that the turret could not be traversed while reloading?
The Western tanks can shoot faster, though their shots are lighter, and are more accurate and can acquire targets faster and more efficiently. These factors, along with excellent training,
outclasses a larger gun or a tougher tank.
I would LOVE to have one of these in my garage if I had the resources.
Can this tank fire sideways wo fear of getting toppled over because of strong firepower?
F-35 Vid soon? I would love to see it be reviewed:D
Also T-62 isn't considered as mbt in Russia
Interesting.
The French AMX-30 used a different 105mm cannon than its NATO allies it was developed shortly after the war and cannot use the same shells at the British L7 105mm.
Interesting fact, The Arjun would loose in a fight with a T-62
may our M60 raytheon upgrades,and your T 62 smoothbores.,,,,.meet on a faraway battlefield ,,,,only for some tea and food on a tablecloth
Tom Kelly I think I’d want to invite a Challenger or some other British AFV with the onboard cooking vessel for a proper bit of tea or coffee, depending on what tickles your fancy.
Hey Mat can you talk about the Brazilian Osório? Greetings from Brazil. Love you channel.
I use to be the first Sargent of this tank t62m the best tanks even better Thant the sudafrican and american tank I spend 2 years fighting every single day , my tank was the clear mine 6 tones off wheels in front
Matsimus? I have forgotten!
What is a stopgap vehicle?
a stopgap vehicle is like a vehicle not meant to become the main tank, it's kinda like to temporarily fulfill the needs of new vehicle until the real main one was issued
@@Kalashnikov413 thx comrade
Matsimus make a video about southkorean FA50 fighter jet I would like to hear abound it and how reliable it is in dogfight with nortkorean airforce mig29 etc..